| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 1, Issue 12 1284-1288, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Nephrology
REGULAR ARTICLES |
JL Holley, CJ Foulks and AH Moss
Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
A nationwide survey of nephrologists was performed to learn which patient factors and characteristics of nephrology fellowship training they reported as influencing their decisions to start or stop dialysis. One hundred seventy-four of 482 responses were received. Most respondents were men in private practice living in large communities (41% in communities over 1,000,000 population). Most had completed a 2- yr fellowship (88%) at a medical school hospital (75%). Few (9%) received formal instruction in medical ethics during fellowship training, and only one quarter had informally discussed life-sustaining treatments during training. Neurological status was the most, and age the least, important patient factor reported to influence decisions to start or stop dialysis. No respondent demographic factors correlated with ranking of patient factors in decisions to initiate or forego dialysis. Family wishes and preexisting medical conditions were significantly more important considerations in initiating than in stopping dialysis. Insights about the factors practicing nephrologists reportedly weigh most heavily in making the difficult decisions to withhold or withdraw dialysis are provided by this study. Additional study of the actual practices of nephrologists in decisions to initiate or withdraw dialysis and the factors influencing those decisions are needed. Formal instruction in these and other ethical problems confronting nephrologists should perhaps be included in fellowship programs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Holley, S. N. Davison, and A. H. Moss Nephrologists' Changing Practices in Reported End-of-Life Decision-Making Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 2(1): 107 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Clement, P. Chevalet, O. Rodat, V. Ould-Aoudia, and M. Berger Withholding or withdrawing dialysis in the elderly: the perspective of a western region of France Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 2446 - 2452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Cohen, M. J. Germain, and D. M. Poppel Practical Considerations in Dialysis Withdrawal: "To Have That Option Is a Blessing" JAMA, April 23, 2003; 289(16): 2113 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Munshi, N. Vijayakumar, N. A. Taub, H. Bhullar, T. C. N. Lo, and G. Warwick Outcome of renal replacement therapy in the very elderly Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 128 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Kee, C. C. Patterson, E. A. Wilson, J. M. McConnell, S. M. Wheeler, and J. D. Watson Stewardship or clinical freedom? Variations in dialysis decision making Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2000; 15(10): 1647 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673