| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 1, Issue 6 923-926, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Nephrology
REGULAR ARTICLES |
Sr Hootkins R, MJ Lerman and JR Thompson
Nephrology/Metabolism Division, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246.
Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion have been evaluated, and both are effective in removing theophylline. We report two consecutive cases of theophylline intoxication in which the sequential treatment of charcoal hemoperfusion and hemodialysis is contrasted to the simultaneous "in series" treatment of hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion. Analysis of the two methodologies shows that the combined in series technique offers several advantages, including increased extraction efficiency, decreased time of hemoperfusion cartridge saturation, and rapid correction of electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities, and that it is well tolerated clinically. Simultaneous hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion should be considered in cases of extreme theophylline intoxication.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S L Greene, P I Dargan, and A L Jones Acute poisoning: understanding 90% of cases in a nutshell Postgrad. Med. J., April 1, 2005; 81(954): 204 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mokhlesi, J. B. Leikin, P. Murray, and T. C. Corbridge Adult Toxicology in Critical Care: Part II: Specific Poisonings Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 897 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673