| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |




*
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Clinical Research
Center for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele
Daccò" Villa Camozzi, Ranica,
Italy
Unit of Nephrology, Ospedali Riuniti, Azienda Ospedaliera, Bergamo,
Italy
Unit of Nephrology, Center of Clinical Physiology of the "Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche," Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Correspondence to Dr. Piero Ruggenenti, Clinical Research Center "Aldo e Cele Daccò" Villa Camozzi, "Mario Negri" Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Gavazzeni 11, 24125, Bergamo, Italy. Phone: + 39 35 319 888; Fax: + 39 35 319 331; E-mail: ruggenenti{at}irfmn.mnegri.it
Abstract. In the Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy study, ramipril
decreased the rate of GFR decline (
GFR) and progression to end-stage
renal disease (ESRD) in 352 patients with proteinuric chronic nephropathies.
This study investigated whether in these patients disease outcome and response
to treatment were affected by gender or insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism
of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene.
GFR (0.43 ±
0.05 versus 0.48 ± 0.08 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and
incidence of ESRD (23 and 22%, respectively) were comparable in male and
female patients. However, compared to conventional treatment, ramipril
decreased
GFR (-52% versus -19%) and progression to ESRD (-74%
versus -40%) more effectively in women than in men. Thus, the
relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of events (ESRD) between
conventional and ramipril treatment was 5.52 (1.59 to 19.17, P =
0.003) in women, but only 1.80 (1.08 to 2.97, P = 0.02) in men. This
gender-related effect of ramipril was associated with more reduction in
proteinuria (-7.8 ± 4.2% versus -21.9 ± 5.7%,
P = 0.05) and was still evident even after correction for potentially
confounding factors such as baseline GFR, daily sodium intake, ramipril dose,
BP control, and concomitant treatment with diuretics or dihydropyridinic
calcium channel blockers (adjusted RR [95% CI]: women, 5.07 [1.26 to 20.38],
P = 0.02; men, 1.44 [0.85 to 2.44], P = 0.17). Ramipril
uniformly decreased
GFR and incidence of ESRD in women with either DD
(-39% and -100%) or II + ID (-71% and -82%) genotype, and in men (-25% and
-50%) with the DD genotype, but had no beneficial effect in men with the II +
ID genotype (+18% and +34%). Thus, the relative risk of events (ESRD) between
conventional and ramipril-treated men was higher in subjects with the DD
genotype (1.85; 0.69 to 4.94) and lower in those with the II ± ID
genotype (0.71; 0.28 to 1.80). Again, in parallel with
GFR and events,
proteinuria decreased in women with DD (-23.3 ± 8.0%) or II + ID (-16.0
± 9.5%) genotype and in men with the DD genotype (-14.8 ± 7.0%),
but did not change in men with II + ID genotype (+1.0 ± 7.8%). Of note,
the ACE genotype-related effect of ramipril was still evident even after
correction for the above potentially confounding factors (adjusted RR [95%
CI]: DD, 2.52 [0.83 to 7.63], P = 0.10; II + ID, 0.35 [0.12 to 1.01],
P = 0.05). Thus, among patients with chronic proteinuric
nephropathies, men are at increased risk of progression due to their lower
response to ACE inhibitor treatment. ACE inhibition is uniformly
renoprotective in women regardless of the ACE polymorphism, and in men with
the DD genotype, but is virtually devoid of beneficial effects in men with the
II or ID genotype. This information may help to guide therapeutic
interventions in clinical practice and to interpret the results of prospective
trials in chronic renal disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Ruggenenti, P. Bettinaglio, F. Pinares, and G. Remuzzi Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and Renoprotection in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Nephropathies Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1511 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Parving, D. de Zeeuw, M. E. Cooper, G. Remuzzi, N. Liu, J. Lunceford, S. Shahinfar, P. H. Wong, P. A. Lyle, P. Rossing, et al. ACE Gene Polymorphism and Losartan Treatment in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Sullivan Sex and the renin-angiotensin system: inequality between the sexes in response to RAS stimulation and inhibition Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1220 - R1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Lely, F. G.H. van der Kleij, T. J. Kistemaker, A. J. Apperloo, P. E. de Jong, D. de Zeeuw, and G. Navis Impact of the Preintervention Rate of Renal Function Decline on Outcome of Renoprotective Intervention Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Coppo, L. Peruzzi, A. Amore, A. Piccoli, P. Cochat, R. Stone, M. Kirschstein, T. Linne, and on behalf of the EC Biomed Concerted Action Projec IgACE: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Children and Young People with IgA Nephropathy and Moderate Proteinuria J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1880 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ruggenenti and G. Remuzzi Kidney Failure Stabilizes after a Two-Decade Increase: Impact on Global (Renal and Cardiovascular) Health Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 2(1): 146 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Miller, D. Z. Cherney, J. A. Duncan, V. Lai, K. D. Burns, C. R.J. Kennedy, J. Zimpelmann, W. Gao, D. C. Cattran, and J. W. Scholey Gender Differences in the Renal Response to Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2554 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kanno, T. Takenaka, T. Nakamura, and H. Suzuki Add-On Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in Patients Who Have Proteinuric Chronic Kidney Diseases and Are Treated with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2006; 1(4): 730 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chiurchiu, G. Remuzzi, and P. Ruggenenti Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Renal Protection in Nondiabetic Patients: The Data of the Meta-Analyses J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2005; 16(3_suppl_1): S58 - S63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mori and A. W. Cowley Jr. Role of Pressure in Angiotensin II-Induced Renal Injury: Chronic Servo-Control of Renal Perfusion Pressure in Rats Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 752 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Wilmer, B. H. Rovin, C. J. Hebert, S. V. Rao, K. Kumor, and L. A. Hebert Management of Glomerular Proteinuria: A Commentary J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3217 - 3232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Jafar, C. H. Schmid, P. C. Stark, R. Toto, G. Remuzzi, P. Ruggenenti, C. Marcantoni, G. Becker, S. Shahinfar, P. E. de Jong, et al. The rate of progression of renal disease may not be slower in women compared with men: a patient-level meta-analysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2047 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D Laverman, D. de Zeeuw, and G. Navis Between-patient differences in the renal response to renin-angiotensin system intervention: clue to optimising renoprotective therapy? Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2002; 3(4): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ruggenenti, A. Perna, and G. Remuzzi ACE Inhibitors to Prevent End-Stage Renal Disease: When to Start and Why Possibly Never to Stop: A Post Hoc Analysis of the REIN Trial Results J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2832 - 2837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673