Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WARD, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by SAMTLEBEN, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WARD, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by SAMTLEBEN, W.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:2344-2350, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

A Comparison of On-Line Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Prospective Clinical Study

RICHARD A. WARD*, BÄRBEL SCHMIDT{dagger}, JEANNINE HULLIN{dagger}, GÜNTHER F. HILLEBRAND{dagger},{ddagger} and WALTER SAMTLEBEN{dagger},{ddagger}

* Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
{dagger} Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Munich
{ddagger} Kuratorium fuer Dialyse und Nierentransplantation, Neuried, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr. Richard A. Ward, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, 615 South Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Phone: 502-852-5757; Fax: 502-852-7643; E-mail: richard.ward{at}louisville.edu

Abstract. Some of the morbidity associated with chronic hemodialysis is thought to result from retention of large molecular weight solutes that are poorly removed by diffusion in conventional hemodialysis. Hemodiafiltration combines convective and diffusive solute removal in a single therapy. The hypothesis that hemodiafiltration provides better solute removal than high-flux hemodialysis was tested in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to either on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration or high-flux hemodialysis. The groups did not differ in body size, treatment time, blood flow rate, or net fluid removal. The filtration volume in hemodiafiltration was 21 ± 1 L. Therapy prescriptions were unchanged for a 12-mo study period. Removal of both small (urea and creatinine) and large (ß2-microglobulin and complement factor D) solutes was significantly greater for hemodiafiltration than for high-flux hemodialysis. The increased urea and creatinine removal did not result in lower pretreatment serum concentrations in the hemodiafiltration group. Pretreatment plasma ß2-microglobulin concentrations decreased with time (P < 0 0.001); however, the decrease was similar for both therapies (P = 0.317). Pretreatment plasma complement factor D concentrations also decreased with time (P < 0.001), and the decrease was significantly greater with hemodiafiltration than with high-flux hemodialysis (P = 0.010). The conclusion is that on-line hemodiafiltration provides superior solute removal to high-flux hemodialysis over a wide molecular weight range. The improved removal may not result in lower pretreatment plasma concentrations, however, possibly because of limitations in mass transfer rates within the body.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Meert, S. Eloot, M.-A. Waterloos, M. Van Landschoot, A. Dhondt, G. Glorieux, I. Ledebo, and R. Vanholder
Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 6, 2008; (2008) gfn522v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. C. van der Weerd, E. L. Penne, M. A. van den Dorpel, M. P.C. Grooteman, M. J. Nube, M. L. Bots, P. M. ter Wee, and P. J. Blankestijn
Haemodiafiltration: promise for the future?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 438 - 443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. De Smet, A. Dhondt, S. Eloot, F. Galli, M. A. Waterloos, and R. Vanholder
Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2006 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. Carracedo, A. Merino, S. Nogueras, D. Carretero, I. Berdud, R. Ramirez, C. Tetta, M. Rodriguez, A. Martin-Malo, and P. Aljama
On-Line Hemodiafiltration Reduces the Proinflammatory CD14+CD16+ Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells: A Prospective, Crossover Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 2315 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. K. Cheung, M. V. Rocco, G. Yan, J. K. Leypoldt, N. W. Levin, T. Greene, L. Agodoa, J. Bailey, G. J. Beck, W. Clark, et al.
Serum beta-2 Microglobulin Levels Predict Mortality in Dialysis Patients: Results of the HEMO Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 546 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. A. Ward
Protein-Leaking Membranes for Hemodialysis: A New Class of Membranes in Search of an Application?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 2421 - 2430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. H. Beerenhout, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, O. Bekers, P. Menheere, L. Hover, L. Klaassen, F. M. van der Sande, E. C. Cheriex, N. Meert, et al.
Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1155 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Locatelli, A. Covic, C. Chazot, K. Leunissen, J. Luno, and M. Yaqoob
Optimal composition of the dialysate, with emphasis on its influence on blood pressure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 785 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Bonomini, E. Ballone, S. Di Stante, T. Bucciarelli, S. Dottori, A. Arduini, A. Urbani, and V. Sirolli
Removal of uraemic plasma factor(s) using different dialysis modalities reduces phosphatidylserine exposure in red blood cells
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 68 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Locatelli
Dose of dialysis, convection and haemodialysis patients outcome--what the HEMO study doesn't tell us: the European viewpoint
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1061 - 1065.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Eknoyan, G. J. Beck, A. K. Cheung, J. T. Daugirdas, T. Greene, J. W. Kusek, M. Allon, J. Bailey, J. A. Delmez, T. A. Depner, et al.
Effect of Dialysis Dose and Membrane Flux in Maintenance Hemodialysis
N. Engl. J. Med., December 19, 2002; 347(25): 2010 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. H. Beerenhout, J. P. Kooman, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Optimizing renal replacement therapy--a case for online filtration therapies?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 2065 - 2070.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Locatelli, L. D. Vecchio, and S. Andrulli
The modality of dialysis treatment: does it influence the response to erythropoietin treatment?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 1971 - 1974.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP