| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |


,
,
*
Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville,
Kentucky
Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich,
Munich
Kuratorium fuer Dialyse und Nierentransplantation, Neuried,
Germany.
Correspondence to Dr. Richard A. Ward, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, 615 South Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Phone: 502-852-5757; Fax: 502-852-7643; E-mail: richard.ward{at}louisville.edu
Abstract. Some of the morbidity associated with chronic hemodialysis is thought to result from retention of large molecular weight solutes that are poorly removed by diffusion in conventional hemodialysis. Hemodiafiltration combines convective and diffusive solute removal in a single therapy. The hypothesis that hemodiafiltration provides better solute removal than high-flux hemodialysis was tested in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to either on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration or high-flux hemodialysis. The groups did not differ in body size, treatment time, blood flow rate, or net fluid removal. The filtration volume in hemodiafiltration was 21 ± 1 L. Therapy prescriptions were unchanged for a 12-mo study period. Removal of both small (urea and creatinine) and large (ß2-microglobulin and complement factor D) solutes was significantly greater for hemodiafiltration than for high-flux hemodialysis. The increased urea and creatinine removal did not result in lower pretreatment serum concentrations in the hemodiafiltration group. Pretreatment plasma ß2-microglobulin concentrations decreased with time (P < 0 0.001); however, the decrease was similar for both therapies (P = 0.317). Pretreatment plasma complement factor D concentrations also decreased with time (P < 0.001), and the decrease was significantly greater with hemodiafiltration than with high-flux hemodialysis (P = 0.010). The conclusion is that on-line hemodiafiltration provides superior solute removal to high-flux hemodialysis over a wide molecular weight range. The improved removal may not result in lower pretreatment plasma concentrations, however, possibly because of limitations in mass transfer rates within the body.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Meert, S. Eloot, M.-A. Waterloos, M. Van Landschoot, A. Dhondt, G. Glorieux, I. Ledebo, and R. Vanholder Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 6, 2008; (2008) gfn522v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. van der Weerd, E. L. Penne, M. A. van den Dorpel, M. P.C. Grooteman, M. J. Nube, M. L. Bots, P. M. ter Wee, and P. J. Blankestijn Haemodiafiltration: promise for the future? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 438 - 443. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Smet, A. Dhondt, S. Eloot, F. Galli, M. A. Waterloos, and R. Vanholder Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2006 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Carracedo, A. Merino, S. Nogueras, D. Carretero, I. Berdud, R. Ramirez, C. Tetta, M. Rodriguez, A. Martin-Malo, and P. Aljama On-Line Hemodiafiltration Reduces the Proinflammatory CD14+CD16+ Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells: A Prospective, Crossover Study J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 2315 - 2321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Cheung, M. V. Rocco, G. Yan, J. K. Leypoldt, N. W. Levin, T. Greene, L. Agodoa, J. Bailey, G. J. Beck, W. Clark, et al. Serum beta-2 Microglobulin Levels Predict Mortality in Dialysis Patients: Results of the HEMO Study J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 546 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Ward Protein-Leaking Membranes for Hemodialysis: A New Class of Membranes in Search of an Application? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 2421 - 2430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Beerenhout, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, O. Bekers, P. Menheere, L. Hover, L. Klaassen, F. M. van der Sande, E. C. Cheriex, N. Meert, et al. Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1155 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Locatelli, A. Covic, C. Chazot, K. Leunissen, J. Luno, and M. Yaqoob Optimal composition of the dialysate, with emphasis on its influence on blood pressure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 785 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bonomini, E. Ballone, S. Di Stante, T. Bucciarelli, S. Dottori, A. Arduini, A. Urbani, and V. Sirolli Removal of uraemic plasma factor(s) using different dialysis modalities reduces phosphatidylserine exposure in red blood cells Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Locatelli Dose of dialysis, convection and haemodialysis patients outcome--what the HEMO study doesn't tell us: the European viewpoint Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1061 - 1065. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Eknoyan, G. J. Beck, A. K. Cheung, J. T. Daugirdas, T. Greene, J. W. Kusek, M. Allon, J. Bailey, J. A. Delmez, T. A. Depner, et al. Effect of Dialysis Dose and Membrane Flux in Maintenance Hemodialysis N. Engl. J. Med., December 19, 2002; 347(25): 2010 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Beerenhout, J. P. Kooman, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen Optimizing renal replacement therapy--a case for online filtration therapies? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 2065 - 2070. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Locatelli, L. D. Vecchio, and S. Andrulli The modality of dialysis treatment: does it influence the response to erythropoietin treatment? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 1971 - 1974. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673