2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505	HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP
advanced	CURRENT ISSUE	ARCHIVES	JASN Express	ONLINE SUBMISSION

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Varela, I. D. Articles by Cañedo, F. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Varela, I. D. Articles by Cañedo, F. V.

Cross-Reactivity between Swine Leukocyte Antigen and Human Anti–HLA-Specific Antibodies in Sensitized Patients Awaiting Renal Transplantation

Inmaculada Díaz Varela^*, Pilar Sánchez Mozo, Alberto Centeno Cortés, Clara Alonso Blanco and Francisco Valdés Cañedo

*Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain; and Departments of Immunology, Experimental Surgery, and Nephrology, Juan Canalejo Hospital, A Coruña, Spain

Correspondence to Dr. Inmaculada Díaz Varela, Laboratorio de Fisiología Renal y Psicobiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Campus de Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. Phone: +34-981-167000 ext. 1709; Fax: +34-981-167153;

ABSTRACT. Xenotransplantation is increasingly viewed as a promising way to alleviate the problem of patients who have alloreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies and therefore tend to accumulate on the waiting list for renal transplantation. One barrier to xenotransplantation in these patients could be the hyperacute or acute vascular rejection as a result of preexisting anti-HLA antibodies that recognize swine leukocyte antigens. The cross-reactivity of sera from 98 patients with pig lymphocytes was studied by flow cytometry. After absorption of xenoreactive natural antibodies (XNA), isotype, class, and antibody specificity causing a positive cross-match (XM) were determined. For nonsensitized patients, all of the antibody binding to pig lymphocytes was due to XNA, which were removed by pig red blood cells absorption. In contrast, in sensitized patients, after removal of XNA, pig lymphocyte XM remained positive. There was no correlation between antibody binding to pig lymphocytes and Ig isotype (IgG or IgM) or HLA class-specific antibodies. For testing evidence that class II–specific antibodies were responsible for antibody binding to pig lymphocytes, HLA class I–specific antibodies were absorbed with pooled human platelets. It was confirmed that HLA class II–specific antibodies were responsible for the positive pig XM, but the strength of the positive XM was weaker than the strength caused by HLA class I–specific antibodies. Sera with multiple specificities (plurispecific sera) displayed a greater frequency of cross-reactivity with swine leukocyte antigens (P < 0.05). Seven of 11 highly immunized patients without cross-reactivity IgG with porcine lymphocytes showed positive XM before an IgM was used. The results demonstrate the cross-reactive nature of HLA antibodies and therefore point out the need to perform a prospective XM after absorption of XNA in presensitized individuals. E-mail: idv@udc.es

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673