Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Termorshuizen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krediet, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Termorshuizen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krediet, R. T.
J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2851-2860, 2003
© 2003 American Society of Nephrology


CLINICAL SCIENCE

Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: Comparison of Adjusted Mortality Rates According to the Duration of Dialysis: Analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2

Fabian Termorshuizen*, Johanna C. Korevaar*, Friedo W. Dekker{dagger}, Jeannette G. van Manen{dagger}, Elisabeth W. Boeschoten{ddagger},§ and Raymond T. Krediet{ddagger} for the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis Study Group{ddagger}

Departments of *Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and {ddagger}Nephrology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; {dagger}Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and §Dianet Dialysis Centers, Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr. Fabian Termorshuizen, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: +31-20-5663607; Fax: +31-20-6912683;

ABSTRACT. Various studies indicate that fair comparisons of mortality rates between hemodialysis (HD) patients and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are difficult because of differences in patient characteristics, because of nonconstant relative risks of death (RR), and because the survival times of patients who switch treatment modalities can be censored in different ways. The differences in mortality rates between HD and PD patients were investigated in an analysis in which these potential sources of bias were taken into account. The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis is a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study in which new patients with ESRD are monitored until transplantation or death. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the mortality data according to treatment modality (HD, n = 742; PD, n = 480). No statistically significant differences in adjusted mortality rates between HD and PD patients were observed during the first 2 yr of dialysis. In the years thereafter, increases in mortality rates for PD patients and resulting decreases in RR in favor of HD were observed (e.g., months 24 to 36, adjusted RR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.91). This tendency was observed especially among patients >=60 yr of age and was not influenced by the censoring strategy. These results suggest that long-term use of PD, especially among elderly patients, is associated with increases in mortality rates. Further analyses are required to determine the potential role of dialysis adequacy in the observed long-term differences in mortality rates between HD and PD patients and to establish the possible survival benefits for PD patients who switch to HD in time. E-mail: FTermorshuizen@cs.com




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
R. van den Berg, T. T. Cnossen, C. J. A. M. Konings, J. P. Kooman, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Different treatment options in peritoneal dialysis
NDT Plus, October 1, 2008; 1(suppl_4): iv14 - iv17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Parikova, W. Smit, M. M. Zweers, D. G. Struijk, and R. T. Krediet
Free water transport, small pore transport and the osmotic pressure gradient
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2350 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. M. Just, F. Th. de Charro, E. A. Tschosik, L. L. Noe, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and M. C. Riella
Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2365 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Alloatti, G. Cabiddu, R. Cocchi, A. Limido, G. Marinangeli, R. Russo, U. Teatini, and F. P. Schena
Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3601 - 3605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Couchoud, O. Moranne, L. Frimat, M. Labeeuw, V. Allot, and B. Stengel
Associations between comorbidities, treatment choice and outcome in the elderly with end-stage renal disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3246 - 3254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
O. Khawar, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, W. K. Lo, D. Johnson, and R. Mehrotra
Is the Declining Use of Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Justified by Outcome Data?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1317 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. J. Wiggins, S. P. McDonald, F. G. Brown, J. B. Rosman, and D. W. Johnson
High membrane transport status on peritoneal dialysis is not associated with reduced survival following transfer to haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 3005 - 3012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Van Biesen, F. Verbeke, and R. Vanholder
Cardiovascular disease in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: arguments pro peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 53 - 58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. Saxena and C. West
Peritoneal dialysis: a primary care perspective.
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 380 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. K. Inrig, J. L. Sun, Q. Yang, L. P. Briley, and L. A. Szczech
Mortality by Dialysis Modality among Patients Who Have End-Stage Renal Disease and Are Awaiting Renal Transplantation
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2006; 1(4): 774 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
B. G. Jaar, J. Coresh, L. C. Plantinga, N. E. Fink, M. J. Klag, A. S. Levey, N. W. Levin, J. H. Sadler, A. Kliger, and N. R. Powe
Comparing the Risk for Death with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in a National Cohort of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 174 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Tonelli, B. Hemmelgarn, B. Manns, S. Davison, C. Bohm, S. Gourishankar, G. Pylypchuk, K. Yeates, and J. S. Gill
Use and Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis among Aboriginal People in Canada
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2005; 16(2): 482 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP