Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on October 19, 2005
J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 3763-3770, 2005
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050512

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2005050512v1
16/12/3763    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, C.
Right arrow Articles by Knoll, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, C.
Right arrow Articles by Knoll, G. A.

Clinical Transplantation

Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplantation: A Comparison between Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C–Based Methods

Christine White*, Ayub Akbari*,{dagger}, Naser Hussain*, Laurent Dinh{ddagger}, Guido Filler§, Nathalie Lepage|| and Greg A. Knoll*,{dagger}

Divisions of* Nephrology; and {ddagger} Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; {dagger} Kidney Research Centre; and Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Health Research Institute; § Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics; and || Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence to: Dr. Greg A. Knoll, Division of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital, Riverside Campus, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 7W9. Phone: 613-738-8400; Fax: 613-738-8337; gknoll{at}ottawahospital.on.ca

Received for publication May 16, 2005. Accepted for publication September 2, 2005.

Accurate measurement of GFR is critical for the evaluation of new therapies and the care of renal transplant recipients. Although not accurate in renal transplantation, GFR is often estimated using creatinine-based equations. Cystatin C is a marker of GFR that seems to be more accurate than creatinine. Equations to predict GFR based on the serum cystatin C concentration have been developed, but their accuracy in transplantation is unknown. GFR was estimated using four equations (Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, and Hoek) that are based on serum cystatin C and seven equations that are based on serum creatinine in 117 adult renal transplant recipients. GFR was measured using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), and the bias, precision, and accuracy of each equation were determined. The mean 99mTc-DTPA GFR was 58 ± 23 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The cystatin C–based equations of Filler and Le Bricon had the lowest bias (–1.7 and –3.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), greatest precision (11.4 and 11.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and highest accuracy (87 and 89% within 30% of measured GFR, respectively). The cystatin C equations remained accurate even when the measured GFR was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The creatinine-based equations were not as accurate, with only 53 to 80% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR. Cystatin C–based equations are more accurate at predicting GFR in renal transplant recipients than traditional creatinine-based equations. Further prospective studies with repetitive measurement of cystatin C are needed to determine whether cystatin C–based estimates of GFR will be sufficiently accurate to monitor long-term allograft function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
C. P. Reinhardt, M. J. Germain, E. V. Groman, J. G. Mulhern, R. Kumar, and D. E. Vaccaro
Functional immunoassay technology (FIT), a new approach for measuring physiological functions: application of FIT to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1583 - F1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
U. Poge, T. Gerhardt, and R. P. Woitas
Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate by Use of Beta-Trace Protein
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1403 - 1405.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Mariat, N. Maillard, M. Phayphet, L. Thibaudin, S. Laporte, E. Alamartine, and F. Berthoux
Estimated glomerular filtration rate as an end point in kidney transplant trial: where do we stand?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 33 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
N. Kasitanon, D.M. Fine, M. Haas, L.S. Magder, and M. Petri
Estimating renal function in lupus nephritis: comparison of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft Gault equations
Lupus, November 1, 2007; 16(11): 887 - 895.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. A. White, A. Akbari, S. Doucette, D. Fergusson, N. Hussain, L. Dinh, G. Filler, N. Lepage, and G. A. Knoll
A Novel Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Beta-Trace Protein
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1965 - 1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. White, A. Akbari, N. Hussain, L. Dinh, G. Filler, N. Lepage, and G. A. Knoll
Chronic kidney disease stage in renal transplantation classification using cystatin C and creatinine-based equations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 3013 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP