Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on April 27, 2005
J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1824-1831, 2005
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004080655

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2004080655v1
16/6/1824    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Sande, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Sande, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, N. W.

Clinical Dialysis

Effect of Ultrafiltration on Thermal Variables, Skin Temperature, Skin Blood Flow, and Energy Expenditure during Ultrapure Hemodialysis

Frank M. van der Sande*, Laura M. Rosales{dagger}, Zohar Brener{dagger}, Jeroen P. Kooman*, Martin Kuhlmann{dagger}, Garry Handelman{ddagger}, Roger N. Greenwood{dagger}, Mary Carter{dagger}, Daniel Schneditz§, Karel M. Leunissen* and Nathan W. Levin{dagger}

* Division of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; {dagger} Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Beth Israel Medical Center, Renal Research Institute, New York, New York; {ddagger} Division of Nutrition, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts; and § Institute of Physiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria

Address correspondence to: Dr. Frank M. van der Sande, Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, P. Debeyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, Limburg 6202AZ, The Netherlands. Phone: +31-43-3875007; Fax: +31-43-3875006; E-mail: fvs{at}groupwise.azm.nl

Received for publication August 10, 2004. Accepted for publication March 16, 2005.

The cause of the increase in core temperature (CT) during hemodialysis (HD) is still under debate. It has been suggested that peripheral vasoconstriction as a result of hypovolemia, leading to a reduced dissipation of heat from the skin, is the main cause of this increase in CT. If so, then it would be expected that extracorporeal heat flow (Jex) needed to maintain a stable CT (isothermic; T-control = 0, no change in CT) is largely different between body temperature control HD combined with ultrafiltration (UF) and body temperature control HD without UF (isovolemic). Consequently, significant differences in {Delta}CT would be expected between isovolemic HD and HD combined with UF at zero Jex (thermoneutral; E-control = 0, no supply or removal of thermal energy to and from the extracorporeal circulation). During the latter treatment, the CT is expected to increase. In this study, changes in thermal variables (CT and Jex), skin blood flow, energy expenditure, and cytokines (TNF-{alpha}, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and IL-6) were compared in 13 patients, each undergoing body temperature control (T-control = 0) HD without and with UF and energy-neutral (E-control = 0) HD without and with UF. CT increased equally during energy-neutral treatments, with (0.32 ± 0.16°C; P = 0.000) and without (0.27 ± 0.29°C; P = 0.006) UF. In body temperature control treatments, the relationship between Jex and UF tended to be significant (r = –0.51; P = 0.07); however, there was no significant difference in cooling requirements regardless of whether treatments were done without (–17.9 ± 9.3W) or with UF (–17.8 ± 13.27W). Changes in energy expenditure did not differ among the four treatment modes. There were no significant differences in pre- and postdialysis levels of cytokines within or between treatments. Although fluid removal has an effect on thermal variables, no single mechanism seems to be responsible for the increased heat accumulation during HD.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Horacek, S. D. Sulkova, M. Fortova, F. Lopot, M. Kalousova, L. Sobotka, J. Chaloupka, V. Tesar, A. Zak, and T. Zima
Resting energy expenditure and thermal balance during isothermic and thermoneutral haemodialysis heat production does not explain increased body temperature during haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3553 - 3560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Pizzarelli
From cold dialysis to isothermic dialysis: a twenty-five year voyage
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1007 - 1012.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. M. Selby and C. W. McIntyre
A systematic review of the clinical effects of reducing dialysate fluid temperature
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1883 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. M. van der Sande, J. P. Kooman, and K. M. Leunissen
Haemodialysis and thermoregulation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1450 - 1451.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP