2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505	HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP
advanced	CURRENT ISSUE	ARCHIVES	JASN Express	ONLINE SUBMISSION

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ASN.2005070772v1 17/2/556    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoy, W. E. Articles by Bertram, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hoy, W. E. Articles by Bertram, J. F.

How Many Glomerular Profiles Must Be Measured to Obtain Reliable Estimates of Mean Glomerular Areas in Human Renal Biopsies?

Wendy E. Hoy^*, Terence Samuel, Michael D. Hughson, Jennifer L. Nicol^* and John F. Bertram

^* Centre for Chronic Disease, Discipline of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Address correspondence to: Dr. Wendy Hoy, Centre for Chronic Disease, Discipline of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia 4029. Phone: +617-3346-4809; Fax: +617-3346-4812; w.hoy{at}uq.edu.au

Received for publication July 26, 2005. Accepted for publication November 23, 2005.

The objective of this study was to investigate the number of glomerular profiles that are required for accurate estimates of mean profile area in a renal biopsy series. Slides from 384 renal biopsies from one center were reviewed. They contained a median of seven glomerular profiles or of four profiles without sclerosis. Profile areas were measured using stereologic point counting. The "true individual mean" for each biopsy was calculated and the "true population mean" for groups of biopsies derived. Individual and population "random sample means" then were calculated from a random sampling of profiles in each biopsy and were compared with true means for the same biopsies. The effect on the true population means of the entire group of biopsies was also assessed, as the minimum number of glomerular profiles that were required for inclusion was changed. In a single biopsy, random sampling of 10 profiles without exclusions and of eight profiles or more without sclerosis reliably estimated the true mean areas. In a group of 30 biopsies, random sampling of five or more glomeruli per biopsy reliably estimated the true population mean. In the aggregate series, inclusion of all 384 biopsies produced the most robust true population mean; the reliability of the estimates decreased as the numbers of eligible biopsies diminished with increasing requisite minimum numbers of profiles per biopsy. We conclude that, while 10 profiles might be needed for reliable area estimates in a single biopsy, far fewer profiles per biopsy can suffice when groups of biopsies are studied. In analyses of groups of biopsies, all available biopsies should be used without consideration of the number of glomerular profiles in each. Stipulation of a specific minimum number of glomeruli in each biopsy for inclusion reduces the power of analyses because fewer biopsies are available for evaluation.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673