Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maschio, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rugiu, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maschio, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rugiu, C.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 2, 832-840, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Nephrology

EDITORIALS

Is there a "point of no return" in progressive renal disease?

G Maschio, L Oldrizzi and C Rugiu

The pathogenesis of progressive renal damage is most probably multifactorial. Whatever the mechanisms involved in renal disease progression, the existence of a "point of no return" has been hypothesized, that is, a stage of structural and functional damage beyond which progression of renal disease occurs independently of dietary measures and/or pharmacological treatment. In experimental animals, dietary protein and phosphate restriction is not fully successful in ameliorating the progression of functional deterioration if administered when renal injury is severe and long standing. Similarly, late treatment with various pharmacological agents (mainly antihypertensive drugs) is less effective than early administration of the same substances. A serum creatinine of 176 mumol/L seems a critical point discriminating the results of either dietary protein and phosphate restriction or antihypertensive treatment in patients with chronic renal disease. The protective effects of both dietary and nondietary intervention seem to be most effective when at least 50% of the residual renal mass is still functioning. The extent to which glomerular sclerosis, vascular hyalinosis, and interstitial fibrosis have already developed can probably blunt or avert the expected results of treatment. Some clinical tests may identify those patients who would benefit from measures such as the reduction in glomerular hemodynamic stress, the long-term inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, and the aggressive treatment of systemic hypertension. The continuous search for a rational preventive treatment before the disease process has reached the "point of no return" will undoubtedly constitute a formidable task for the modern nephrologist.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Duncan, J. Heathcote, O. Djurdjev, and A. Levin
Screening for renal disease using serum creatinine: who are we missing?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 1042 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673