Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on October 15, 2009
J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 2305-2313, 2009
© 2009 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009020171

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2009020171v1
20/11/2305    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levey, A. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Levey, A. S.

Brief Reviews

Measured GFR as a Confirmatory Test for Estimated GFR

Lesley A. Stevens and Andrew S. Levey

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: Dr. Lesley A. Stevens, 800 Washington Street, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111. Phone: 617-636-2569; Fax: 617-636-5740; E-mail: Lstevens1{at}tuftsmedicalcenter.org

Clinical assessment of kidney function is central to the practice of medicine. GFR is widely accepted as the best index of kidney function in health and disease, and accurate values are required for optimal decision making. Estimated GFR based on serum creatinine is now widely reported by clinical laboratories, and in most circumstances, estimated GFR is sufficient for clinical decision making. GFR estimates may be inaccurate in the non–steady state and in people in whom non-GFR determinants differ greatly from those in whom the estimating equation was developed. If GFR estimates are likely inaccurate or if decisions based on inaccurate estimates may have adverse consequences, a measured GFR is an important confirmatory test. Endogenous creatinine clearance is the most common method used to measure GFR in clinical practice but may be difficult to obtain or fraught with error. We review methods for GFR measurement using urinary and plasma clearance of exogenous filtration markers and focus on urinary clearance of iothalamate and plasma clearance of iohexol compared with inulin clearance. We suggest plasma clearance of nonradioactive markers be more widely implemented in clinical settings. Further research is necessary on the impact of the use of measured GFR as a confirmatory test.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP