Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on September 17, 2009
J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 2449-2458, 2009
© 2009 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008111166

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Press Release
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2008111166v1
20/11/2449    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luan, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojo, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luan, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojo, A.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Six-Month Prophylaxis Is Cost Effective in Transplant Patients at High Risk for Cytomegalovirus Infection

Fu L. Luan*, Linda J. Stuckey{dagger}, Jeong M. Park{dagger}, Daniel Kaul{ddagger}, Diane Cibrik* and Akinlolu Ojo*

*Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology;
{dagger}College of Pharmacy and Department of Pharmacy Service; and
{ddagger}Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Correspondence: Dr. Fu L. Luan, 3914 Taubman Center, Box 0364, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0364. Phone: 734-763-0990; Fax: 734-936-9621; E-mail: fluan{at}med.umich.edu

Received for publication November 13, 2008. Accepted for publication July 6, 2009.

The risk of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a concern in seronegative kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients of seropositive organs despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis. The optimal duration of prophylaxis is unknown. We studied the cost effectiveness of 6- versus 3-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir. A total of 222 seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants received valganciclovir prophylaxis for either 3 or 6 mo during two consecutive time periods. We assessed the incidence of CMV infection and disease 12 mo after completion of prophylaxis and performed cost-effectiveness analyses. The overall incidence of CMV infection and disease was 26.7% and 24.4% in the 3-mo group and 20.9% and 12.1% in the 6-mo group, respectively. Six-month prophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk for CMV disease (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.72), but not infection (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.14). Cost-effectiveness analyses showed that 6-mo prophylaxis combined with a one-time viremia determination at the end of the prophylaxis period incurred an incremental cost of $34,362 and $16,215 per case of infection and disease avoided, respectively, and $8,304 per one quality adjusted life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses supported the cost effectiveness of 6-mo prophylaxis over a wide range of valganciclovir and hospital costs, as well as variation in the incidence of CMV disease. In summary, 6-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir combined with a one-time determination of viremia is cost effective in reducing CMV infection and disease in seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP