Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canzanello, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krom, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canzanello, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Krom, R. A.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 5, 1910-1917, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Nephrology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Renal sodium handling with cyclosporin A and FK506 after orthotopic liver transplantation

VJ Canzanello, SC Textor, SJ Taler, DJ Wilson, L Schwartz, RH Wiesner, MK Porayko and RA Krom
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Hypertension is common after orthotopic liver transplantation and may be due, in part, to cyclosporin A-induced renal dysfunction and/or enhanced proximal tubular sodium reabsorption. To determine whether enhanced proximal tubular sodium reabsorption is central to the development of posttransplant hypertension, measurements of renal hemodynamics and fractional clearances of lithium and sodium were compared 1 month after orthotopic liver transplantation in previously normotensive patients receiving either cyclosporin A (N = 24) or FK506 (N = 18), an immunosuppressive agent that is structurally unlike cyclosporin A and that has a lower reported incidence of hypertension. Median prednisone doses were 20 and 13 mg/day in the cyclosporin A and FK506 groups, respectively (P < 0.05). At 1 month, mean arterial blood pressure was higher in the cyclosporin A versus the FK506 group: 108 +/- 2 versus 95 +/- 3 mm Hg (P < 0.05). GFR, RBF, and renal vascular resistance were not different between the two groups: 59 +/- 4 and 53 +/- 5 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 439 +/- 28 and 440 +/- 41 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and 22,429 +/- 1,822 and 22,977 +/- 3,506 dyne s/cm5 per 1.73 m2, respectively. Fractional lithium excretion was similar in the cyclosporin A and FK506 groups: 19.9 +/- 2.2 and 19.4 +/- 2.0% (P = not significant) although both values were lower than those of normal controls (25.5 +/- 1.1%) (P < 0.05). Fractional sodium excretion was 2.7 +/- 0.3 and 2.3 +/- 0.4% in the cyclosporin A and FK506 groups, respectively (P = not significant).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. LIGTENBERG, R. J. HENÉ, P. J. BLANKESTIJN, and H. A. KOOMANS
Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Patients: Cyclosporin A Versus Tacrolimus
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2001; 12(2): 368 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Takeda, I. Miyamori, K. Furukawa, S. Inaba, and H. Mabuchi
Mechanisms of FK 506–Induced Hypertension in the Rat
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 130 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP