Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderstam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrom, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderstam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrom, J.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 7, 2453-2460, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Nephrology


REGULAR ARTICLES

Middle-sized molecule fractions isolated from uremic ultrafiltrate and normal urine inhibit ingestive behavior in the rat

B Anderstam, AH Mamoun, P Sodersten and J Bergstrom
Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Uremic patients with suppressed food intake may regain appetite soon after starting dialysis, presumably because of the removal of one or more toxic factors that suppress appetite. To investigate this matter, this study used a new experimental model in free-moving, unstressed male Wistar rats (300 to 350 g) with feeding catheters channeled from the top of the skull to the oral cavity. When the rats recovered from surgery, they were tested under standardized conditions by being given an intraoral infusion (1 mL/min) of a 1 M sucrose solution or a 97 g/L protein solution or a mixed solution of carbohydrate, protein, and fat (Fortimel (Nutricia Nordica AB, Stockholm, Sweden)) while the time (volume) of ingestion was recorded. Solutions to be tested for their ability to inhibit ingestion were injected intraperitoneally (lp) and the intraoral infusion was started 20 min later. Plasma ultrafiltrate was collected from end-stage renal failure patients by isolated ultrafiltration at the beginning of their first hemodialysis and pooled. Ultrafiltrate was also obtained by filtering pooled plasma from healthy volunteers in vitro, using the same type of dialyzer and cellulose acetate membranes as those used in the uremic patients. Morning urine samples from healthy volunteers were pooled and subjected to the same in vitro filtration procedure as the normal plasma. Intraperitoneal injection of 20 mL normal ultrafiltrate had no effect on sucrose ingestion, whereas injection of 20 mL uremic ultrafiltrate reduced the ingestion of sucrose solution by 23% and the ingestion of Fortimel by 17%. Ten mL of ultrafiltrate from normal urine reduced the sucrose intake by 42%. The pooled ultrafiltrates from normal and uremic plasma and normal urine were subjected to molecular filtrations using a series of membranes with known cut-off points. The filtrations yielded four concentrated fractions with molecular weight ranges of 0.1 to 0.5 kilodaltons (kd), 0.5 to 1 kd, 1 to 5 kd, and 5 to 10 kd, respectively; the plasma fractions were concentrated a factor of about 25:1 and the urine fractions by about 15:1. After an ip injection of 2 mL of each concentrated plasma fraction, only the 1 to 5 kd fraction from the uremic ultrafiltrate inhibited sucrose intake, whereas the corresponding fraction from the normal ultrafiltrate had no effect. After injection of 1, 3, and 5 mL of the concentrated fractions of uremic ultrafiltrate, a dose-dependent inhibition of sucrose intake was achieved with the 1 to 5 kd fraction and, to a lesser extent, with the 5 to 10 kd fraction. Intraperitoneal injection of 0.5, 1.0, and 2 mL of the concentrated 1 to 5 kd fraction, but not of the other fractions from normal urine, also resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of sucrose intake. The 1 to 5 kd fractions from the uremic ultrafiltrate and the normal urine ultrafiltrate also inhibited protein intake in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that one or more toxic compounds in the middle-molecule weight range, which are normally excreted in the urine, accumulate in uremia and suppress food intake.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. W, Y. PX, L. BM, C. RD, M. DL, M. RH, I. H, O. MH, W. K, B.-J. K, et al.
Anorexia and Cachexia in Renal Failure--Is Leptin the Culprit?: Role of Leptin and Melanocortin Signaling in Uremia-Associated Cachexia. J Clin Invest 115: 1659-1665, 2005
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 2245 - 2250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. H. Beerenhout, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, O. Bekers, P. Menheere, L. Hover, L. Klaassen, F. M. van der Sande, E. C. Cheriex, N. Meert, et al.
Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1155 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Wright, G. Woodrow, S. O'Brien, E. Armstrong, N. King, L. Dye, J. Blundell, A. Brownjohn, and J. Turney
Cholecystokinin and leptin: their influence upon the eating behaviour and nutrient intake of dialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. K. Cheung, N. W. Levin, T. Greene, L. Agodoa, J. Bailey, G. Beck, W. Clark, A. S. Levey, J. K. Leypoldt, D. B. Ornt, et al.
Effects of High-Flux Hemodialysis on Clinical Outcomes: Results of the HEMO Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3251 - 3263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Bellizzi, B. R. Di Iorio, V. Terracciano, R. Minutolo, C. Iodice, L. De Nicola, and G. Conte
Daily nutrient intake represents a modifiable determinant of nutritional status in chronic haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1874 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. H. Beerenhout, J. P. Kooman, A. J. Luik, S. G. J. Jeuken-Mertens, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Optimizing renal replacement therapy--a case for online filtration therapies?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 2065 - 2070.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. E. Mitch
Insights into the Abnormalities of Chronic Renal Disease Attributed to Malnutrition
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2002; 13(90001): S22 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. J. Wright, G. Woodrow, S. O'Brien, N. A. King, L. Dye, J. E. Blundell, A. M. Brownjohn, and J. H. Turney
A novel technique to demonstrate disturbed appetite profiles in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1424 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. L. MEIRELES, S. R. PRICE, A. M. L. PEREIRA, J. T. A. CARVALHAES, and W. E. MITCH
Nutrition and Chronic Renal Failure in Rats: What Is an OptimalDietary Protein?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 1999; 10(11): 2367 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. VANHOLDER and R. DE SMET
Pathophysiologic Effects of Uremic Retention Solutes
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 1999; 10(8): 1815 - 1823.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A.-H. MAMOUN, P. SÖDERSTEN, B. ANDERSTAM, and J. BERGSTRÖM
Evidence of Splanchnic-Brain Signaling in Inhibition of Ingestive Behavior by Middle Molecules
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 1999; 10(2): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP