| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 7, 2689-2693, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Nephrology
REGULAR ARTICLES |
F Gaspari, E Guerini, N Perico, L Mosconi, P Ruggenenti and G Remuzzi
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy.
The iohexol injection plasma clearance method is a good alternative to the inulin clearance method for determination of GFR, but requires multiple blood samples. To avoid this, methods have been developed which derive GFR from a formula that uses a single plasma concentration of the tracer and anthropometric data. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single plasma sample taken after iohexol injection allows reliable estimation of GFR. In this study, results of single- point determination were compared with those obtained by multiple-point plasma clearance. The GFR of 686 outpatients with different degrees of renal function were recalculated by use of the Jacobsson formula. The optimum time for sampling was found at 10 h after injection of the marker for clearances < 40 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 4 h for clearances between 40 and 99 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and 3 h for clearances > 100 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Results documented that for 75% of the patients, the simplified technique gave an error between -5% to +5% in the evaluation of GFR; for the remaining 25% of the patients, prediction error ranged from -22% to +40%. Furthermore, despite a highly significant correlation between multiple-point iohexol clearance (six plasma samples) and the single-point method (Y = 0.968X + 1.704, r2 = 0.988), the regression intercept was statistically different from 0 and the standard error of the slope estimate established that 95% confidence interval did not include 1.0 (the line of identity), thus indicating that the model can be rejected by the data at a significance level of 0.05. Thus the single-plasma-sample method to determine GFR after radiocontrast injection does not represent a real advantage over the multiple-point method and may lead to unacceptable errors in GFR calculation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Bird, C. Peters, A. R. Michell, and A. M. Peters Effect of extracellular fluid volume on single-sample measurement of glomerular filtration rate Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 19, 2008; (2008) gfn437v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Caramori, P. Fioretto, and M. Mauer Enhancing the Predictive Value of Urinary Albumin for Diabetic Nephropathy J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 339 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Bostom, F. Kronenberg, and E. Ritz Predictive Performance of Renal Function Equations for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Normal Serum Creatinine Levels J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 2140 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673