Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoenich, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldfinch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoenich, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldfinch, M.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol 7, 871-876, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Nephrology

REGULAR ARTICLES

A comparison of three brands of polysulfone membranes

NA Hoenich, C Woffindin, A Brennan, PJ Cox, JN Matthews and M Goldfinch
Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.

A prospective clinical crossover study comparing the functional performance and biocompatibility of three brands of polysulfone membranes (Fresenius Polysultone (Fresenius Ag, Bad Homburg, Germany), Polyphen (Minntech Corp., Minneapolis, MN), and Biosulfane (WR Grace Inc., Danvers, MA)) incorporated in ethylene oxide-sterilized dialyzers of comparable surface area (1.3 to 1.35 m2) was undertaken. The clearance of small molecules by each membrane was comparable. Plasma levels of beta 2 microglobulin fell to 49.9% of pretreatment values by 210 min when using the Fresenius Polysulfone membrane, 60.2% with the Polyphen membrane, and 63.1% with the Biosulfane membrane. The reduction achieved by the Fresenius Polysulfone membrane was superior (P = 0.003). The plasma reductions were associated with the recovery of 195 mg beta 2 microglobulin from the dialysate for the Fresenius Polysulfone membrane and 158 mg for the Polyphen membrane, but no beta 2 microglobulin was recovered from the dialysate with the Biosulfane membrane. The dialysate collected with the Fresenius Polysulfone membrane also contained a mean of 6853 mg of total protein, compared with 5490 mg with the Polyphen membrane and 8422 mg with the Biosulfane (P = 0.04) membrane. The neutropenia was slight and independent of membrane brand, as were the changes in C3a des arg and SC5b-9 complement components. The reduction in platelet counts was higher for the Biosulfane membrane than for the other brands (P = 0.003). This study indicates that whereas the polymer base of the membrane is the same, its production and subsequent handling during dialyzer production induce changes that attain statistical significance, most notably in the way that the membrane removes beta 2 microglobulin and interacts with proteins. The differences observed are a consequence of the different alloying polymers used during manufacture and, consequently, the membranes cannot be considered equivalent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Lesaffer, R. De Smet, N. Lameire, A. Dhondt, P. Duym, and R. Vanholder
Intradialytic removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins: role of solute characteristics and of dialyser membrane
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673