| 2006 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.371 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UP FRONT MATTERS |
,
,
,
*Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium;
Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany;
Néphrologie, Hôpital Conception and INSERM U608, Université Aix-Marseille, France;
Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and ||Charité, Medizinische Klinik IV, Berlin, Germany
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raymond.vanholder{at}ugent.be.
| Abstract |
|---|
Reviewing the current picture of uremic toxicity reveals its complexity. Focusing on cardiovascular damage as a model of uremic effects resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality, most molecules with potential to affect the function of a variety of cell types within the vascular system are difficult to remove by dialysis. Examples are the larger middle molecular weight molecules and protein-bound molecules. Recent clinical studies suggest that enhancing the removal of these compounds is beneficial for survival. Future therapeutic options are discussed, including improved removal of toxins and the search for pharmacologic strategies blocking responsible pathophysiologic pathways.
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673