Abstract. Insofar as neutral endopeptidase inhibition has afforded
evidencefor a tubular luminal action of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP),the
present study was undertaken to investigate a possible effectof the peptide
on chloride reabsorption (JCl) in thick ascendinglimb (TAL). Luminal addition
of ANP to in vitro microperfusedcortical TAL (CTAL) significantly
decreased JCl with a thresholdand a maximum concentration of 10-12
M and 10-9 M, respectively.A similar effect of 10-9 M
ANP was observed in medullary TAL(MTAL). The effect of luminal ANP was
significantly reducedby HS-142-1, a specific inhibitor of guanylyl cyclase
receptor,and by H-8, a protein kinase G inhibitor, but was not affectedby
the protein kinase C inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I. Unexpectedly,the effect
of ANP was not additive with that of endothelin (ET),a peptide that was
previously shown to decrease JCl in TAL througha calcium-independent, protein
kinase Cmediated pathway.Indeed, ET-1 (10-8 M in the lumen)
significantly decreased JCland prevented a further effect of ANP on the same
tubule. Similarly,the decrease of JCl induced by simultaneous addition of ET
andANP was not higher than that obtained with each agent alone.Conversely,
the inhibitory effect of ANP was enhanced in thepresence of cyclic guanosine
monophosphate (cGMP; 10-6 M inthe lumen). ET-1 significantly
attenuated the ANP-stimulatedgeneration of cGMP in microdissected CTAL and
failed to preventa further decrease of JCl promoted by a permeant cGMP
analogue.It is concluded that luminal ANP decreased Cl reabsorption inmouse
CTAL and MTAL. This effect was abrogated by ET-1 as aresult of the inhibition
of ANP-stimulated cGMP generation.
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) participates in the regulationof
extracellular fluid volume, partly through inhibition ofrenal sodium
reabsorption (1). Although
cortical (2) and inner
medullary
(3,4)
collectingtubules represent the main renal sites of ANP action, two studies
indicatethat the medullary part (M) of the thick ascending limb of Henle's
loop(TAL) contributes to ANP-elicited natriuretic effect
(5,6).
Inthese latter studies
(5,6),
ANP was tested at the basolateralface of the tubular segments. Nevertheless,
the recent developmentof inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase has afforded
some linesof evidence for a luminal action of the peptide
(7,8,9).
Neutralendopeptidase, an ectoenzyme located in the brush border membraneof
the proximal tubule, serves as a major route for the degradationof filtered
peptides, including ANP (10).
Administration ofneutral endopeptidase inhibitors increases urinary excretion
ofANP, of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and of sodiumand decreases
plasma renin activity. Such effects might resultin part from an inhibitory
effect of luminal ANP on NaCl reabsorptionin TAL, leading to increased sodium
delivery to downstream sitesof the nephron, especially to the macula
densa.
The present work was undertaken to investigate a possible actionof luminal
ANP on chloride reabsorption (JCl) in mouse TAL,mainly in its cortical part
(CTAL). This work also evaluatedthe possible interaction between ANP and
endothelin 1 (ET) because(1) luminal and basolateral ET inhibit JCl
in the mouse TALthrough a protein kinase C- dependent, calcium-independent
pathway(11), and (2)
neutral endopeptidase also degrades ET
(12). Finally,it was verified
that luminal cGMP decreased JCl in CTAL as previouslyreported in the
medullary TAL (MTAL), through a pathway thatdid not involve activation of
protein kinase G (6).
The main results indicated that luminal ANP decreased chloridereabsorption
along the whole TAL, an effect prevented by ETbut not by cGMP. The action of
ET was related to an inhibitionof the ANP-stimulated cGMP accumulation.
Microperfusion Experiments
CTAL and MTAL were microperfused in vitro following the technique
routinelyused in our laboratory
(6). Briefly, male Swiss mice
that weighed18 to 20 g were killed by cervical dislocation and exsanguinated.
Coronalslices were cut from both kidneys and immediately immersed ina cold
perfusion solution (for composition, see below) with0.1% bovine serum albumin
added. CTAL (1 = 495 ± 16 µm,n = 67) and MTAL (1 = 607
± 104 µm, n = 5) weredissected from the medullary rays of
the cortex and from theinner stripe of the outer medulla, respectively. Each
tubulewas then transferred to a Lucite chamber thermostatically maintainedat
36.0 ± 0.1°C, with a flow rate of approximately5 ml/min.
Each perfused tubule was allowed to equilibrate for 1 h (CTAL)or 30 min
(MTAL). During the experiment, the luminal fluid wascollected every 10 min.
After a 30-min control period, the requiredagent was added to the lumen
followed by one or two 30-min experimentalperiods, as mentioned in the text.
The luminal fluid was manuallychanged with a syringe, under microscopic
observation, with2 ml of a solution delivered for approximately 4 min and
followedby an equilibration period so that the entire maneuver lastedmore
than 10 min. It has been previously shown
(6) and verifiedin this work
(see Results section) that this protocol only slightlyalters JCl in
time-control tubules.
The composition of the perfusion solution was as follows: 140mM NaCl, 4 mM
KCl, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 0.44 mM NaH2PO4, 0.33 mM
Na2HPO4,1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2,
10 mM N-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N1-ethanesulfonic
acid,and 10 mM urea. Glucose (5mM) was added to the bathing solution.
Solutionswere devoid of bicarbonate because it is not required for NaCl
reabsorptionin the mouse CTAL
(13). All solutions were
adjusted to pH 7.38to 7.41.
Chloride concentrations in collected fluid (Cc) and perfusate(Cp) were
determined by microelectrometric titration. The tubularflow rate (V) was
calculated from the volume of the collectedsample, assuming that water
reabsorption was negligible in TAL.The length (L) of the perfused tubule was
measured with an eyepiecemicrometer at 160 x magnification. The net
chloride flux wascalculated as JCl = (Cc - Cp) x V/L and expressed in
pmoles/minper mm tubular length.
Fifteen groups of tubules were studied (one tubule per mouse):
Two-phase experiments performed on CTAL
Group 1: Time-controltubules for which the luminal fluid waschanged after
the controlperiod for a solution of identicalcomposition.
Groups 2 to5: After the control period, theluminal fluid waschanged for
asolution containing ANP at therespective concentrationsof
10-12,10-11, 10-9, and 10-7
M.
Group 6: After the control period,ANP was added to the bathat the
concentration of 10-9 M.
Group7: BisindolylmaleimideI, a protein kinase C inhibitor,waspresent
in the lumen atthe concentration of 10-7 M sincethecontrol
period onward.ANP (10-9 M) was added to the lumenduringthe
experimentalperiod.
Group 8: H-8, an inhibitor more specificfor cGMP-dependentthan for
cAMP-dependent protein kinases,was present in thebath at the concentration
of 10-6 M sincethe control periodonward. ANP (10-9 M)
was added to the lumenduring the experimentalperiod.
Group 9: HS-142-1, a specificantagonist of guanylatecyclasereceptors A
and B (14), wasadded to the
lumen at theconcentrationof 10-8 M simultaneouslywith ANP during
the experimentalperiod.
Group 10: After thecontrol period, ANP (10-9 M) wasadded to
thelumen simultaneouslywith cGMP (10-6 M).
Group11: After the control period, ANP(10-9 M) was added to
thelumen simultaneously with ET-1 (10-8M).
Three-phase experiments performed on CTAL
Group 12:After the control period, cGMP (10-6 M) was addedto
the lumen,followed by another luminal addition of ANP (10-9
M).
Group13: After the control period, ET-1 (10-8 M) was addedto
thelumen, followed by another luminal addition of ANP (10-9
M).
Group 14: After the control period, ET-1 (10-8 M) was addedto
the lumen, followed by another luminal addition of the permeantanalogue 8
bromo cGMP (10-4 M).
Two-phase experiments performedon MTAL
Group 15: After the control period, ANP was addedto the lumenat the
concentration of 10-9 M.
For each period, data from the 10-min collections at equilibriumwere
pooled and considered as a single point. Values are expressedas means
± SEM. Statistical significance was evaluatedbetween two periods
within each series by the paired t test.For comparing the different
series, results were expressed asthe percentage of JCl inhibition
versus the control period ofeach tubule. Statistical treatment was
the one-way analysisof variance followed by Fisher's Least Significant
Differencetest, using as parameter the difference of log (JCl) betweenthe
control and experimental periods. The criterion for statisticalsignificance
was P < 0.05.
cGMP Content
cGMP content was determined by RIA Kit NEN (Life Science Products,Inc.,
Boston, MA) in tubules microdissected after collagenasedissociation of kidney
tissue. Nine male Swiss mice were anesthetizedwith sodium pentobarbital (0.1
mg/10 g body wt). The left kidneywas perfused in situ via the
abdominal aorta with 5 ml of incubationsolution containing 140 mM NaCl, 4 mM
KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mMMgSO4, 0.44 mM
NaH2PO4, 0.33 mM Na2HPO4, 4 mM
NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose,10 mM CH3COONa, and 20 mM HEPES.
Collagenase (151 U/mg) 0.3%wt/vol and BSA 0.1% wt/vol were added. Thin
pyramids were excisedalong the corticopapillary axis of the kidney and were
incubatedfor 10 to 15 min at 35°C in the incubation solution containing
0.1%collagenase.
For cGMP determinations, the tubular segments were transferredto a slide
and photographed for subsequent determination oftheir length. Tubular
segments (approximately 70 mm total length)were pooled onto a slide
containing 2 µl of incubationsolution added with phosphodiesterase
inhibitors, namely IBMX(10-3 M), an unspecific phosphodiesterase
inhibitor; 8-methoxymethylIBMX (10-4 M), an inhibitor specific for
the phosphodiesterasedegrading both cAMP and cGMP (type I); and zaprinast
(10-4 M),an inhibitor specific for the cGMP phosphodiesterase
(type Vand IX). Each sample was preincubated for 10 min at 30°Cand then
incubated for 4 min at 35°C in the presence of2 µ1 of either the
solution alone (baseline), or ANP (10-7M) or ANP plus ET-1
(10-6 M). The reaction was stopped by transferringthe sample into
a tube containing 25 µl of a 5% (vol/vol)mixture of formic acid and
absolute ethanol. After evaporation,acetate buffer was added and cGMP was
determined by radioimmunoassayafter acetylation. The limit of detection was
1.5 fmole of cGMPper tube.
In each experiment, comparison between two conditions was evaluatedby
paired t test. In six experiments, baseline, ANP, and ANPplus ET
were tested on the same animal.
Endothelin, ANP, H-89, and H-8 were purchased from Calbiochem(La Jolla,
CA). Bisindolylmaleimide was purchased from ResearchBiochemicals
International (Natick, MA). HS-142-1 was a giftfrom Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co, Ltd
(Japan). All other products werefrom Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Inhibitory Effect of Luminal ANP on JCl
In CTAL, luminal ANP 10-9 M significantly decreased JCl from
170.8± 26.8 to 101.6 ± 14.0 pmoles/min per mm (P <
0.01,Figure 1, middle
columns), an effect associated with a significantdecrease of the chloride
concentration difference between theperfusate and collected fluid from 17.4
± 3.8 to 10.8± 2.2 mM (P < 0.02). This inhibitory
effect of luminalANP was significantly higher than the slight decrease
observedin time-control tubules, in which the luminal fluid was changedwith
the same solution devoid of hormone (7.6 ± 1.9%versus 39.6
± 2.0%, P < 0.001,
Figure 1, left columns).When
added to the bath at the concentration of 10-9 M, ANP induceda
similar effect (30.7 ± 3.5%, Figure
1, right columns).Finally, the inhibitory effect of luminal ANP
was also observedin MTAL (Table
1).
Figure 1. Effect of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) on chloride reabsorption (JCl)
in cortical thick ascending limb (CTAL). (N), number of tubules. In two groups
(left and middle columns), the luminal fluid was changed after the control
period (C) with a solution either of identical composition (C') or
containing ANP at the concentration of 10-9 M (ANP1). In
the third group (right columns), 10-9 M ANP was added to the bath
(ANPbl). *, significantly different from the preceding
period.
Table 1. Effect of luminal ANP on chloride reabsorption in
MTALa
When different concentrations of ANP were tested on separategroups of
CTAL, a dose-dependent effect was observed from 10-12M to
10-9 M, a concentration for which the maximal effect wasreached
(Figure 2). This latter
concentration has been usedin the following experiments.
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of different concentrations of ANP on JCl in CTAL. The
ordinate (in percentage) represents the decrease of JCl between the control
and experimental periods in the same tubule. *, significantly
different from the preceding value, by analysis of variance (ANOVA; see
Materials and Methods section for statistical analysis).
The luminal effect of ANP was largely blocked by HS-142 to 1and by H-8, at
the respective concentrations of 10-8 and 10-6M
(Figure 3). Indeed, the
inhibition of JCl observed betweencontrol and experimental periods in the
presence of these agentswas not substantially different from that observed in
the time-controltubules described above (10.8 ± 3.8% and 11.1 ±
3.4%versus 7.6 ± 1.9%, for HS-142 to 1, H-8, and control
groups,respectively). Conversely, the effect of ANP was virtually unaffected
bybisindolylmaleimide I (38.0 ± 3.4% compared with 39.6± 2.0%,
the ANP-exposed tubules presented above). Thisagent was added to the lumen at
the concentration of 10-7 Msince the control period onward as far
as we have previouslyshown that this protocol completely blocked the luminal
effectof ET in mouse TAL
(11).
Figure 3. Effect of ANP on JCl in CTAL, in the presence of inhibitors of protein
kinase C, protein kinase G, and guanylyl cyclase-coupled ANP receptor. The
ordinate (in percentage) represents the decrease of JCl between the control
and experimental periods in the same tubule. ANP (10-9 M) was added
to the lumen during the experimental period; bisindolylmaleimide I (Bis,
10-7 M) was present in the lumen since the control period onward;
H-8 (10-6 M) was present in the bath since the control period
onward; HS-142-1 (10-8 M) was added to the lumen simultaneously
with ANP. *, significantly different from the group Bis, by ANOVA
(see Materials and Methods section for statistical analysis).
Absence of Additivity of Luminal ANP and Luminal ET Effects
Two protocols were used. In the first one, the agents were added
sequentiallyto the same tubules during two consecutive experimental periods;
inthe second one, both agents were simultaneously added to thelumen during
the experimental period. The results indicatedthat ET-1, at the maximum
concentration of 10-8 M, significantlydecreased JCl from 190.4
± 24.4 to 110.5 ± 14.9pmoles/min per mm (P < 0.05)
and fully abolished a furthereffect of ANP on the same tubule (110.5 ±
15.0 pmoles/minper mm, Figure
4). Because both ANP and ET exert quantitativelysimilar effects
on JCl, one can question whether the absenceof the effect of ANP may result
from the inability of JCl tobe lowered below a baseline value. However,
addition of 10-6M cGMP to the lumen significantly lowered JCl from
216.5 ±23.6 to 122.5 ± 16.7 pmoles/min per mm (P <
0.01)and did not prevent a further ANP-induced decrease of JCl to76.7
± 13.3 pmoles/min per mm (P < 0.001,
Figure 4).
Figure 4. Effect of sequential addition to the lumen of either endothelin and ANP or
cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and ANP on JCl in CTAL. Experiments were
performed on two groups of five tubules. Left columns: after the control
period (C), endothelin 1 (ET) and ANP were added sequentially to the lumen at
the concentration of 10-8 M and 10-9 M, respectively.
Right columns: after the control period (C), cGMP, at the concentration of
10-6 M, and ANP were added sequentially to the lumen. *,
significantly different from the preceding value.
Similar results were obtained with the second protocol: Simultaneous
additionof ANP and ET decreased JCl from 231.6 ± 52.5 to 145.8
±34.7 pmoles/min per mm (Figure
5), a 37.9 ± 3.3% inhibitionsimilar to that obtained with
ANP alone (39.6 ± 2.0%,presented above). In contrast, concomitant
addition of ANP andcGMP decreased JCl from 185.6 ± 33.8 to 70.7
±12.3 pmoles/min per mm, representing a 60.1 ± 3.6% inhibition
significantlyhigher than that obtained with ET + ANP alone (P <
0.01,Figure 5).
Figure 5. Effect of simultaneous addition to the lumen of ANP and either ET or cGMP
on JCl in CTAL. Experiments were performed on two groups of five tubules.
After the control period (C), ANP was added to the lumen at the concentration
of 10-9 M in the presence of either ET at the concentration of
10-8 M (left columns) or cGMP at the concentration of
10-6 M (right columns). *, significantly different from
the preceding value (paired t test); §, significantly different
from the other value.
Two hypotheses might account for the nonadditivity between theeffects of
ANP and ET. First, these two agonists might sharea common signaling pathway
at a step beyond the activation oftheir respective protein kinase. Indeed, we
have previouslyshown that ET-1 inhibits JCl in the mouse CTAL via a protein
kinaseC-dependent, calcium-independent pathway
(11), and we verifiedin the
present study that this inhibitory effect was not significantlymodified by
H-8 (33.4 ± 4.7% inhibition of JCl, n = 4).Second, ANP and ET
might interact negatively with each other.This hypothesis was tested by
investigating a possible effectof ET on ANP-stimulated cGMP production
(Figure 6). The increasein
cGMP accumulation observed in the presence of 10-7 M ANP(0.068
± 0.010 versus 0.029 ± 0.010 fmole/mm,P <
0.01, for ANP and control, respectively) was significantlyattenuated by
10-6 M ET-1 (0.042 ± 0.007 fmole/mm, P< 0.02),
although reaching a value still higher than thebaseline (P <
0.05). The concentrations of ANP used herecorresponded to the maximum effect
reported by others on cGMPproduction
(15). Indeed, as is discussed
below, it must be notedthat the cGMP accumulation was very low. However, this
cannotbe accounted for by a technical pitfall because in the same
experiments,ANP increased cGMP accumulation in glomeruli from 2.9 ±
0.7to 22.8 ± 1.5 fmole/glomerulus (n = 10).
Figure 6. Inhibitory effect of ET on ANP-stimulated cGMP production in CTAL. (N):
number of animals from which CTAL were obtained. On six animals, cGMP
accumulation was determined under the three conditions in the same experiment.
The effect of ANP (10-7 M) was compared either with the basal value
or with ANP added with ET (10-6 M), determined in the same
experiment. *, significantly different from the basal value;
§, significantly different from ANP.
That ET inhibited ANP action at a step proximal to cGMP accumulationwas
further verified by evaluating the additivity of the effectsof ET and the
permeant cGMP analogue 8-bromo cGMP. In the presenceof 10-8 M
luminal ET-1, JCl was decreased significantly by 40.3± 4.2% (from
146.7 ± 19.2 to 92.9 ± 7.5pmoles/min per mm, P <
0.05), a value similar to that obtainedin the ET + ANP group (41.8 ±
4.4%). In contrast to ANP,however, 8-bromo cGMP, added to the bath at the
concentrationof 10-4 M, further decreased JCl by 34.4 ±
3.6% (to 58.0± 10.1 pmoles/min per mm, P < 0.01,
Figure 7). Thisinhibitory
factor was similar to the effect of 8-bromo cGMPalready reported in our
laboratory
(6,16).
Figure 7. Time dependence of JCl in the presence of ET and ANP or ET and 8-bromo cGMP
in CTAL. Ordinate represents JCl expressed as the percentage of the second
value obtained during the control period, which, in most cases, corresponded
to the steady state. JCl corresponding to 100% was 153.8 ± 22.3
(n = 5) and 201.4 ± 24.3 (n = 5) pmoles/min per mm
(not significant), for 8-bromo cGMP and ANP groups, respectively. At times
indicated by the arrows, ET (10-8 M) was added to the lumen
followed by either ANP in the lumen (10-9 M, [UNK]) or the permeant
cGMP analogue 8-bromo cGMP in the bath (10-4 M, )
*, significantly different from 8Br-cGMP (see Materials and Methods
section for statistical analysis).
The main results of the present study indicate that luminalANP decreased
JCl in CTAL and MTAL. In CTAL, this effect wasimpaired by ET through an
inhibition of ANP-stimulated cGMPproduction.
The presence of luminal guanylyl cyclase-coupled ANP receptorsalong the
nephron has been strongly suggested by the effectsof in vivo
administration of neutral endopeptidase inhibitors
(7,8,9).
Furthermore,ANP receptors have been detected in the apical membrane of the
thinlimbs of Henle's loop and the cortical collecting tubule ofthe rat
(17). Despite this, only one
study has reported an inhibitoryeffect of luminal ANP on sodium transport in
microcatheterizedinner medullary collecting duct in the rat
(4). Thus, takentogether, this
study (4) and the present one
represent the demonstrationof a functional action of luminal ANP in tubular
segments ofthe nephron.
The luminal effect of ANP observed here may be of physiologicrelevance
because it was obtained at the concentration of 10-12M. Indeed,
assuming that ANP found in urine is provided onlyby the filtered hormone,
this concentration is of the same orderas the one calculated in TAL from the
urinary excretion rateunder basal conditions and three orders of magnitude
lower thanthe one reached after administration of neutral endopeptidase
inhibitors(8). Taken together,
present and previous results from our laboratoryin the mouse
(6) as well as a work from
Nonoguchi et al. (5)
inthe rat provide compelling evidence for an inhibitory effectof luminal and
basolateral ANP on chloride reabsorption alongthe whole TAL. Moreover,
because urodilatin shares the samereceptors as ANP and exerts a similar
effect as ANP on JCl inMTAL
(6), similar results would have
been obtained with therenal endogenous peptide.
The present data indicated that the effects of ANP and ET werenot
additive, although these two agents triggered differentsignaling pathways. It
has been previously shown that luminaland basolateral ET-1 inhibit chloride
reabsorption in the mouseTAL through a protein kinase C activation,
independent of anyincrease in intracellular calcium
(11). It has been further
verifiedin the present work that the effect of ANP on JCl was not mediatedby
protein kinase C or that of ET by protein kinase G (see Resultssection). That
the ET effect on JCl was not altered by a proteinkinase G inhibitor may argue
against a stimulation of nitricoxide generation by this hormone, in contrast
to what has beenreported in the rat
(18). Species differences may
be responsiblefor these discrepancies. The lack of additivity of ANP and ET
effectsis accounted for in part by the inhibition by ET of ANP-generatedcGMP
accumulation because (1) ET failed to prevent a furtherinhibitory
effect on JCl of a permeant cGMP analogue and (2)this effect was
directly observed by determining cGMP content.That the action of ANP may be
negatively controlled by ET througha protein kinase C-mediated inhibition of
guanylyl cyclase activityhas already been established on vascular smooth
muscle cellsand endothelial cells
(19,20).
It must be noted that when cGMPcontent was determined in tubular samples, the
agonists werepresent in the incubation medium. Nevertheless, it may be
assumedthat the luminal surface was also accessible to these agentsinasmuch
as, first, microscopic observation revealed that mostmicrodissected tubules
displayed a fairly open lumen and, second,numerous studies report that
electrolyte transport through theapical Na+ -K+
-2Cl- cotransporter in MTAL suspensions is inhibitedby incubation
with selective blockers such as furosemide orbumetanide. This point
notwithstanding, ANP (6);
present data)exerts the same effect on JCl via similar signaling pathwayson
both sides of the epithelium, a pattern also observed forET
(11).
That ET inhibited ANP-induced cGMP accumulation in the presenceof
phosphodiesterase inhibitors argues for an inhibition ofcGMP synthesis.
Nevertheless, this conclusion must be mitigatedgiven the very low levels of
cGMP accumulation determined inCTAL by us and others
(5,15,16),
suggesting the presence ofremaining phosphodiesterase activity. It is
noteworthy thataddition of zaprinast, an inhibitor specific for the
cGMP-dependentphosphodiesterase (types 5 and 6) barely improved the
accumulationrate of nucleotide, as compared with the studies in which IBMX
alonewas used
(5,15).
Among the nine phosphodiesterase families asyet described
(21), some of them turned out
to be unexpectedlyinsensitive to IBMX, an inhibitor considered to be
unspecificfor these enzymes. Therefore, a possible stimulation by ET ofa yet
unknown cGMP-dependent phosphodiesterase, insensitiveto both IBMX and
zaprinast, cannot be precluded with certainty.
This work reported an inhibitory effect of luminal ANP in TAL.Compelling
evidence is thus afforded that both ANP and ET, fromeither apical or
basolateral membranes, and cGMP from the lumendecrease JCl in TAL
(6,11).
However, because the presence ofthe nucleotide enhanced the inhibitory effect
of ANP, ET impairedit at a step proximal to cGMP accumulation. The
physiologicrelevance of such a negative regulation is not obvious because
bothhormones exhibit similar effects on JCl. Some evidence, however,suggests
that these two agents promote opposite effects on renin
secretioninhibitionfor ANP
(10) and activation for ET
(22)which is inversely
relatedto the chloride delivery to the macula densa. Although thisissue was
not addressed in the present study, one can speculatethat an ET-induced
regulating process could prevent the decreasein renin secretion that might be
expected from the action ofANP on JCl.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Center National dela Recherche
Scientifique and from the Commissariat à
l'EnergieAtomique. The technical assistance of Huguette Moysan is gratefully
acknowledged.The author is indebted to Jean-Baptiste Michel for fruitful
discussion.
Maack T: Role of atrial natriuretic factor in volume control.
Kidney Int 49:1732
-1737, 1996[Medline]
Nonoguchi H, Sands JM, Knepper MA: ANF inhibits NaCl and fluid
absorption in cortical collecting duct of rat kidney. Am J
Physiol 256:F179
-F186, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Rocha AS, Kudo LH: Atrial peptide and cGMP effects on NaCl
transport in inner medullary collecting duct. Am J
Physiol 259:F258
-F268, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sonnenberg H, Honrath U, Wilson DR: In vivo microperfusion of inner
medullary collecting duct in rats: Effect of amiloride and ANF. Am
J Physiol 259:F222
-F226, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nonoguchi H, Tomita K, Marumo F: Effects of atrial natriuretic
peptide and vasopressin on chloride transport in long- and short-looped
medullary thick ascending limbs. J Clin Invest90
: 349-357,1992
Néant F, Bailly C: Luminal and
intracellular cGMP inhibits the mTAL reabsorptive capacity through different
pathways. Kidney Int 44:741
-746, 1993[Medline]
Pham I, Gonzalez W, El Amrani AIK,
Fournié-Zaluski MC, Philippe M, Laboulandine
I, Roques BP, Michel JB: Effects of converting enzyme inhibitor and neutral
endopeptidase inhibitor on blood pressure and renal function in experimental
hypertension. J Pharmacol Exp Ther265
: 1339-1347,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wilkins MR, Settle SL, Stockmann PT, Needleman P: Maximizing the
natriuretic effect of endogenous atriopeptin in a rat model of heart failure.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6465
-6469, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brenner BM, Ballermann BJ, Gunning ME, Zeidel ML: Diverse
biological actions of atrial natriuretic peptide. Physiol
Rev 70: 665-699,1990[Free Full Text]
de Jesus Ferreira MC, Bailly C: Luminal and basolateral endothelin
inhibit chloride reabsorption in the mouse thick ascending limb via a
Ca-independent pathway. J Physiol (London)505
: 749-758,1997[Medline]
Sokolovsky M, Galron R, Kloog Y, Bdolah A, Indig FE, Blumberg S,
Fleminger G: Endothelins are more sensitive than sarafotoxins to neutral
endopeptidase: Possible physiological significance. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 87:4702
-4706, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Di Stefano A, Greger R, de Rouffignac C, Wittner M: Active NaCl
transport in the cortical thick ascending limb of Henle's loop of the mouse
does not require the presence of bicarbonate.
Pflügers Arch420
: 290-296,1992[Medline]
Matsuda Y, Morishita Y: HS-142-1: A novel nonpeptide atrial
natriuretic peptide antagonist of microbial origin. Cardiovasc Drug
Rev 11: 45-59,1993
Nonoguchi H, Knepper MA, Manganiello VC: Effects of atrial
natriuretic factor on cyclic guanosine monophosphate and cyclic adenosine
monophosphate accumulation in microdissected nephron segments from rats.
J Clin Invest 79:500
-507, 1987
Néant F, Imbert-Teboul M, Bailly C:
Cyclic guanosine monophosphate is the mediator of platelet-activating factor
inhibition on transport by the mouse kidney thick ascending limb. J
Clin Invest 94:1156
-1162, 1994
Ritter D, Dean AD, Gluck SL, Greenwald JE: Natriuretic peptide
receptors A and B have different cellular distributions in rat kidney.
Kidney Int 48:1758
-1766, 1995
Plato CF, Garvin JL: Endothelin inhibits thick ascending limb
(THAL) chloride flux via production of NO [Abstract]. J Am Soc
Nephrol 9: 42A,1998
Jaiswal RK: Endothelin inhibits the atrial natriuretic factor
stimulated cGMP production by activating the protein kinase C in rat aortic
smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm182
: 395-402,1992[Medline]
Marala RB, Duda T, Sharma RK: Interaction of atrial natriuretic
factor and endothelin-1 signals through receptor guanylate cyclase in
pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem120
: 69-80,1993[Medline]
Dousa TP: Cyclic-3',5'-nucleotide phosphodiesterase
isozymes in cell biology and pathophysiology of the kidney. Kidney
Int 55: 29-62,1998
Received for publication July 30, 1999.
Accepted for publication March 17, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:
G. R. Ares, P. Caceres, F. J. Alvarez-Leefmans, and P. A. Ortiz cGMP decreases surface NKCC2 levels in the thick ascending limb: role of phosphodiesterase 2 (PDE2)
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2008;
295(4):
F877 - F887.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M. Wendel, L. Knels, W. Kummer, and T. Koch Distribution of Endothelin Receptor Subtypes ETA and ETB in the Rat Kidney
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
November 1, 2006;
54(11):
1193 - 1203.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]