Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLLIDAY, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLLIDAY, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, A. J.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:1857-1864, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

1,25-Dihydroxy-19-nor-vitamin D2, a Vitamin D Analog with Reduced Bone Resorbing Activity In Vitro

L. SHANNON HOLLIDAY*, STEPHEN L. GLUCK*, EDUARDO SLATOPOLSKY{dagger} and ALEX J. BROWN{dagger}

* Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, and Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
{dagger} Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Correspondence to Dr. Alex J. Brown, Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Division, 660 South Euclid, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: 314-362-8232; Fax: 314-362-8237; E-mail: abrown{at}imgate.wustl.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. 1,25-Dihydroxy-19-nor-vitamin D2 (19-norD2), a new analog of 1,25(OH)2D3, suppresses parathyroid hormone in renal failure patients and in uremic rats but has less calcemic activity than 1,25(OH)2D3. Although 19-norD2 has high affinity for the vitamin D receptor and similar pharmacokinetics to those of 1,25(OH)2D3, it has much less bone resorbing activity in vivo. The intrinsic activity of 19-norD2 on osteoclastogenesis and activation of bone resorption in mouse bone marrow cultures was examined to determine the mechanism involved. 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 (10 nM) were equivalent in stimulating the formation and maintenance of large multinucleated, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cells. However, the amount of bone resorbed by osteoclasts stimulated by 10 nM 19-norD2, as measured by pit-forming assays, was reduced 62% compared with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3-stimulated osteoclasts (P < 0.05). This difference could not be attributed to enhanced catabolism or to downregulated vitamin D receptor. The rate of degradation of 19-norD2 in cultures was approximately 20% greater than 1,25(OH)2D3, not enough to account for the different effects on bone resorption. The VDR levels were identical in cultures that were treated with 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3. In summary, 19-norD2 is less effective than 1,25(OH)2D3 in stimulating mouse marrow osteoclasts to resorb bone. The reason for this difference is not clear but seems to involve the late maturation and/or activation of osteoclasts as the number of pits produced by each tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cell is reduced under stimulation by 19-norD2 compared with 1,25(OH)2D3.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Development of secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common occurrence in patients with chronic renal failure. The pathogenesis of the hyperparathyroidism has been attributed to phosphate retention and the low levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 in these patients, both of which produce a tendency toward hypocalcemia. The parathyroid glands respond initially to the low calcium by increasing parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion and synthesis, but with chronic hypocalcemia the parathyroid glands become hyperplastic (1). 1,25(OH)2D3 can also suppress PTH gene transcription (2), and therefore the low levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 also lead to overexpression of the PTH gene, further exacerbating the hyperparathyroidism.

Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism involves correction of the hyperphosphatemia, usually with calcium-based phosphate binders that retard intestinal absorption of dietary phosphate, and restoration of the 1,25(OH)2D3 levels by replacement therapy. However, as a result of its potent calcemic actions in the intestine and bone, 1,25(OH)2D3 often produces hypercalcemia in renal patients, especially in those who are receiving oral calcium. This limitation of 1,25(OH)2D3 therapy has led to the development of vitamin D analogs that retain the direct action of 1,25(OH)2D3 to suppress PTH gene expression but with less calcemic activity. Several analogs have been developed for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. These include 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D2 (19-norD2) (3,4), 22-oxacalcitriol (OCT) (5,6), and 1 {alpha}(OH)D2 (7). 19-norD2 and OCT have been shown to exert a selective action on PTH in animal models of renal failure, e.g., suppression of PTH levels with less hypercalcemia (3,5).

The mechanisms by which these analogs exert this selectivity on the parathyroid glands are under investigation. The selective action of OCT on PTH seems to be due to its altered pharmacokinetics (8,9). Its low affinity for the serum vitamin D binding protein (DBP) leads to rapid clearance but greater tissue accessibility. The transient appearance of OCT in target tissues after injection elicits only short-lived effects on intestinal calcium absorption and bone mobilization but a prolonged suppression of PTH gene expression (10).

The mechanism for the selectivity of 19-norD2 is less clear but is not due to altered pharmacokinetics (11). Furthermore, the decreased intestinal calcium absorption and bone mobilization activities measured in vivo are due to an acquired resistance that is observed only after several days of chronic treatment (12). These observations led us to determine whether the low bone mobilizing activity of 19-norD2 observed in vivo could be reproduced in the mouse bone marrow culture system (13). We report that 19-norD2 is equipotent to 1,25(OH)2D3 in differentiating osteoclast precursors to a mature phenotype but has a decreased capacity to induce the mature osteoclasts to resorb bone.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
Reagents were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless noted otherwise. 1,25-(OH)2D3 was a generous gift from Dr. Milan R. Uskokovic (Hoffman-LaRoche, Nutley, NJ). 1,25(OH)2-19-nor-D2 (19-norD2) was provided by Abbott Laboratories (Chicago, IL). 1,25(OH)2D2 and 1,25(OH)2-19-nor-D3 were generously provided by Dr. Satya Reddy (Brown University, Providence, RI). Sperm whale teeth for the in vitro bone mobilization assay were obtained from the U.S. Department of Fisheries (San Diego, CA).

Mouse Marrow Cultures
Mouse marrow osteoclasts were generated as described previously (13,14). Briefly, 8- to 20-g Swiss-Webster mice were killed by cervical dislocation. This protocol was approved by the Animal Studies Committee of the Washington University School of Medicine. Femur and tibia were dissected free from adherent tissue; marrow was removed by cutting both bone ends, inserting a syringe with a 25-gauge needle, and flushing the marrow using {alpha}MEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum ({alpha}MEM D10). The marrow was washed twice with {alpha}MEM D10 and plated at a density of 1 x 106 cells/cm2 in tissue culture plates in {alpha}MEM D10 containing various concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2. Cultures were fed every other day by replacing half the media per plate and adding fresh vitamin D compounds. After 5 d in culture, osteoclasts appeared. These were detected by staining for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity using a kit from Sigma. TRAP-positive (TRAP+) cells were segregated into two groups: multinuclear (2 to 10 nuclei) and giant (>10 nuclei), as described previously (15).

In Vitro Bone Resorption Assay
Resorption assays were performed as described previously (14) using sperm whale teeth sliced into 100-µm thick specimens with a surface area of 1 cm (2). The slices were washed by agitation in 50 ml of sterile PBS, transferred to 24-well plates, and soaked overnight in {alpha}MEM D10 before exposure to mouse marrow cultures. Mouse marrow was cultured for 5 d on tissue culture plates in the presence of various concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2. The medium was replenished on day 3 with fresh compound at the indicated concentration. Cells were then scraped free from the tissue culture plates using a disposable plastic cell scraper (Costar, Cambridge, MA), washed with {alpha}MEM D10 three times, and plated onto dentine slices in 24-well plates at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells per well. The indicated concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 in {alpha}MEM D10 were added, and the cells were incubated on dentine wafers for 5 d with no change of medium. After 5 d, cells and debris were removed from the dentine slices by washing with 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate. The slices were dehydrated through an ethanol series, air dried, sputter coated with gold, and examined using a Hitachi H-400 scanning electron microscope (Nissei Sangyo America, Ltd., Rolling Meadows, IL) operated at 15 kV. Photos of the bone slices were taken at 100 x with no tilt angle. Overlays that divided the micrographs into grid spaces of 50 µm were placed over the photos, and the percentage of grid intersections falling over a pit was determined. The total area analyzed was 680,000 µm (2). Thus, the percentage of grid intersections over pits gave an estimation of the percentage of the total area of the slice that was resorbed. For quantification, a single pit was counted as any contiguous area of bone resorption, even if it contained more than one scalloped area. Area and pit number were determine in three randomly selected fields from each separate dentine slice. Between three and six dentine slices were assayed per experimental condition.

Vitamin D Receptor Content
The vitamin D receptor (VDR) content in the bone marrow cell cultures was determined by an intact cell assay previously described in detail (16). Briefly, mouse bone marrow cells were incubated as described above with radioinert 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 for 5 d. The cells were washed three times with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to remove the radioinert vitamin D compounds, and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C in serum-free medium containing 1 nM 1,25(OH)2-[26,27-3H]D3 with or without 250 nM radioinert 1,25(OH)2D3. Under these conditions, vitamin D compounds bound to the VDR at the end of the 5-d incubation period were competed away by the excess of tritiated ligand. At the end of the incubation, the medium was aspirated and the cells were placed on ice. After the monolayers were washed once with cold PBS containing 1% BSA and twice with cold PBS, they were sonicated into TEDKI buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 300 mM KCl, and 300 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Aliquots of the sonicate were removed for protein analysis, and the remainder was mixed the charcoal-coated dextran. After 15 min on ice, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 x g. Tritium in the supernatant was determined by scintillation counting. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total binding (tritiated 1,25(OH)2D3 only) and nonspecific binding (tritiated 1,25(OH)2D3 plus radioinert 1,25(OH)2D3). VDR content is expressed as specific binding (fmol) per milligram of cell protein.

Catabolism of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2
The rates of catabolism of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 by mouse bone marrow cultures were determined by plating the freshly isolated bone marrow cells in culture dishes in {alpha}MEM D10 medium containing 10 nM 1,25(OH)2-[26,27-3H]D3 or 19-nor-[11-3H]D2 at a specific activity of 0.05 µCi/pmol. Medium containing the tritiated vitamin D compounds was replaced after 48 h. Samples of the medium (100 µl) were taken on day 3 (immediately after the medium change), day 4, and day 5 to determine the amount of tritiated compound remaining. The medium aliquots were mixed with 100 µl of acetonitrile containing 500 ng of radioinert compound to act as carrier and to allow assessment of recovery. Two milliliters of acetonitrile:water (1:1) was added, and the samples were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min. The supernatants were applied to C18-silica cartridges. The cartridges were washed with 5 ml of water, and the vitamin D compounds were eluted with 4 ml of acetonitrile and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The amount of the tritiated vitamin D compound remaining was determined by resolving the samples on normal phase HPLC using methylene chloride:isopropanol (97:3) as the running solvent. Fractions eluting near the 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 peaks were collected, dried, and quantified by scintillation counting. Recovery was assessed by measuring the UV absorbance of the peak of the carrier vitamin D compound.

Statistical Analyses
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Samples were compared by ANOVA using the program SigmaStat (Jandel, San Rafael, CA). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of 19-norD2 on Osteoclast Differentiation
The ability of 19-norD2 to differentiate osteoclast precursor cells to mature osteoclasts was assessed in primary cultures of mouse bone marrow grown on plastic dishes. Cultures were treated with 10 nM 1,25-(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 on days 1, 3, and 6 of culture. On day 7, the cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and stained for TRAP activity. TRAP+ multinuclear (2 to 10 nuclei/cell) and giant cells (> 10 nuclei/cell) were counted. The numbers of TRAP+ cells from cultures stimulated with 19-norD2 were not significantly different from cultures stimulated with 1,25(OH)2D3, and both stimulators generated many more TRAP+ cells than if no stimulation occurred (Figure 1).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Generation of multinucleated tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase—positive (TRAP+) cells by 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D2 (19-norD2). Mouse marrow cultures were treated with 10 nM vehicle ({square}), 1,25(OH)2D3 ({blacksquare}), or 19-norD2 ([UNK]) for 7 d with culture media changes and re-addition of hormone on days 3 and 6. On day 7, the cultures were fixed and stained for TRAP activity, and the TRAP+ multinucleated (2 to 10 nuclei) and giant (> 10 nuclei) cells were determined. n = 8 per condition. *P < 0.05 versus control, #P < 0.05 versus 1,25(OH)2D3.

 

The relative potencies of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 to induce osteoclast maturation were determined by treating mouse bone marrow cultures for 5 d with various concentrations of the two compounds. The concentration-dependence curves for the formation of multinucleated TRAP+ cells (Figure 2A) and TRAP+ giant cells (Figure 2B) were biphasic and peaked at 10 nM with both vitamin D compounds. There was no significant difference in the responses to 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 at 1, 10, and 100 nM, indicating that the two compounds had similar potencies in stimulating osteoclastogenesis.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Concentration dependence for survival of mature TRAP+ cells. Mouse marrow cultures were grown in the presence of the specified concentration of 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 ({blacksquare}) or 19-norD2 ([UNK]) for 5 d in tissue culture dishes. On day 6, the cells were scraped and plated into tissue culture wells and incubated for an additional 5 d in the same concentration of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 and then fixed and stained to identify TRAP+ multinucleated (A) and giant cells (B). n = 3 for each determination. *P < 0.05 versus the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group.

 

Effect of 19-norD2 on Osteoclastic Bone Resorption
Having found little difference in the ability of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 to stimulate the formation of TRAP+ cells, we next tested whether there were differences in the capacity of the two compounds to stimulate bone resorption. Mouse marrow in tissue culture plates was stimulated for 5 d with 10 nM 19-norD2. On day 6, the cells were scraped and loaded onto dentine slices and then incubated in the absence or presence of 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2. After 5 d, the dentine slices were stripped of cells and the number of resorption pits, the size of the pits, and the total area resorbed were determined by scanning electron microscopy as described in the Materials and Methods section (Figure 3). In the absence of either vitamin D compound during the incubation with dentine slices, no pits were observed despite that cultures placed on the dentine slices initially contained mature osteoclasts. Conversely, substantial resorption was observed when either vitamin D compound was present during the resorption phase. However, the amount of total area resorbed was 63% less in the 19-norD2-treated cultures than in those treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 during the resorption phase. This seemed to be due to a fewer number of pits formed in the presence of 19-norD2 (Figure 3).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. In vitro bone resorption in response to 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2. Mouse marrow cultures were treated for 5 d in culture dishes with 10 nM 19-norD2. The cultures were scraped, plated onto dentine slices, and treated with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 ({blacksquare}) or 10 nM 19-norD2 ([UNK]) for 5 d. The dentine slices were then prepared for scanning electron microscopy, and the total area resorbed, the number of pits, and the area resorbed per pit were determined. The data are expressed as a percentage of the value for each parameter obtained by treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3. n = 4 per group. *P < 0.05 versus 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group.

 

These findings suggest that 19-norD2 may be unable to activate mature osteoclasts to resorb bone. Therefore, mouse bone marrow cultures were differentiated by treatment with either 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3 and then treated with 19-norD2 during the resorption phase. The results, shown in Figure 4, indicate that osteoclasts that formed in response to 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment during the differentiation phase were able to resorb bone in response to 19-norD2 added during the resorption phase. The amount of resorption under these conditions was not significantly different from that produced by treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 during both phases. However, when 19-norD2 was present during both the differentiation and resorption phases, the amount of resorption was significantly less (Figure 4). Furthermore, osteoclasts that formed in response to 19-norD2 treatment during the differentiation phase resorbed bone at a high rate when treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 during the resorption phase. Thus, the reduced bone resorption was observed only when the cultures were treated with 19-norD2 during both the differentiation and resorption phases.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Reduced bone resorption by 19-norD2 is dependent on time of exposure. Mouse marrow cultures were incubated on tissue culture dishes for 5 d with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 or 10 nM 19-norD2. On day 6, the cells were scraped and loaded onto dentine slices. Cultures from each group were incubated with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 or 10 nM 19-norD2 for 5 d. The dentine slices were then examined for resorption by scanning electron microscopy. The data are expressed as a percentage of the value for each parameter obtained by treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3. n = 4 to 5 per group. *P < 0.05 versus the group treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 in both the differentiation and activation phases.

 

Concentration-dependence curves for activation of resorption were determined by first differentiating the osteoclast precursor by treatment with various amounts of 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3 and then incubating the differentiated cultures on dentine slices in the presence of the same concentrations of the same compound for 5 additional days. The highest resorption was obtained at 10 nM of both compounds, but the maximum amount achieved with 19-norD2 was approximately 30% of that achieved with 1,25(OH)2D3 (Figure 5A). The lower resorption by 19-norD2 was reflected in the reduced number of pits (Figure 5B); the area per pit was not different for the two compounds (Figure 5C).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Effects of various concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 on in vitro bone resorption. Mouse marrow cultures were differentiated in culture dishes for 5 d with various concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 ({blacksquare}) or 19-norD2 ([UNK]). The cells were scraped and plated onto dentine slices for an additional 5 d in the presence of the same concentration of compound used in the differentiation phase. Resorption of the dentine slices was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The data are expressed as total area resorbed (A), number of pits (B), and area per pit (C). The data are expressed as a percentage of the value for each parameter obtained by treatment with 10-8 M 1,25(OH)2D3. n = 3. *P < 0.05 versus the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated group.

 

To test possible mechanisms that may be responsible for the lower bone resorbing activity of 19-norD2, we measured the rates of catabolism of 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2 in the mouse marrow cultures. Relatively little degradation of either molecule was detected during the first 3 d of culture (data not shown). Fresh medium containing tritiated 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3 was added on day 3, and the amount of each compound remaining was determined by HPLC analysis as described in the Materials and Methods section. Significant catabolism of both 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 occurred between days 3 and 5 (Figure 6). After 5 d, 78% of the 19-norD2 and 63% of the 1,25(OH)2D3 had been degraded. The slightly higher rate of degradation of 19-norD2 may contribute to its lower bone resorbing activity but is unlikely to be the primary factor responsible for the disparate effects of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 on bone resorption.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Catabolism of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 by mouse marrow cultures. Mouse marrow cultures were grown for 5 d in the presence of 10 nM [3H]1,25(OH)2D3 or [3H]19-norD2. After 3, 4, or 5 d, the incubations were stopped by the addition of 1 vol of acetonitrile containing 500 ng of radioinert compound to assess recovery. The media plus cells were extracted and resolved by normal phase HPLC as described previously (16). The amounts of [3H]1,25(OH)2D3 or [3H]19-norD2 remaining were calculated and plotted against the time of culture. n = 3 per point.

 

Active vitamin D compounds are known to stabilize the VDR in target cells, leading to VDR upregulation and potentiation of the activity of the ligand. Therefore, we determined whether the lower activity of 19-norD2 with time could be due to defective stabilization of the VDR. Bone marrow cultures treated for 5 d with 10 nM 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3 had the same VDR levels as determined by whole-cell binding assay (Figure 7). Thus, the disparate activities of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 could not be explained by differences in VDR levels.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) content in mouse marrow cultures treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 or 19-norD2. Mouse marrow cultures were grown for 5 d in the presence of 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 or 10 nM 19-norD2. VDR content in the cultures was determined as outlined in the Materials and Methods section. n = 3 per group.

 

To determine which structural differences in 19-norD2 are responsible for the decreased bone resorbing activity in vitro, we also tested the activities of 1,25(OH)2D2 and 19-norD3 in this system. Bone marrow cultures were treated with 10-nM concentrations of the compounds during both the differentiation and activation phases, and the area resorbed was determined. Although total resorption was lower in cultures that were treated with 19-norD3, the reduction was not significant (Figure 8). The data suggest that both the 19-nor modification and the D2 side chain are necessary for the reduced activity of 19-norD2.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Structure-activity relationship in vitamin D analogs. Mouse marrow cultures were treated during the differentiation phase and the resorption phase on dentine slices with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3, 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D2, 10 nM 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D3, or 10 nM 19-norD2. Resorption of the dentine slices was determined by scanning electron microscopy. n = 3 per group. *P < 0.05.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Analogs of vitamin D that retain the PTH-suppressing activity of 1,25(OH)2D3 but have lower calcemic activity provide a safer means of correcting or possibly preventing the secondary hyperparathyroidism that develops in patients with chronic renal disease. 19-norD2 was shown to meet these criteria in the renal failure rat model (3) and, after successful clinical trials (4), is now available for treatment of patients. The mechanism(s) responsible for the selectivity of 19-norD2, specifically its decreased calcemic activity, is not well understood. However, we recently found that with chronic treatment, 19-norD2 is less potent than 1,25(OH)2D3 in stimulating both intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization in vivo and that these disparate effects of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 do not seem to involve pharmacokinetic differences (12,17). This pointed toward an intrinsic defect in 19-norD2 to stimulate calcium transport and bone resorption that may be reproducible in vitro.

In the present study, we showed that 19-norD2 is dramatically less effective than 1,25(OH)2D3 in stimulating bone resorption in an in vitro mouse marrow culture system. In principle, this reduction in bone resorption could be accomplished by limiting the number of mature osteoclasts present or by limiting the bone resorptive activity per osteoclast. One way to limit the bone resorptive activity of osteoclasts is to reduce their survival. However, the number of surviving mature osteoclasts was not different in cultures treated with 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3 (Figures 1 and 2). We believe, therefore, that 19-norD2 is fully capable of inducing survival factors that are required by the osteoclasts.

It was more difficult to distinguish between potential effects on differentiation versus activation. By one measure of differentiation, the formation of multinucleated TRAP+ cells, we did not detect statistical differences in the number of cells that were differentiated by the 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3, and we did not detect distinct morphologic differences. However, in resorption studies, we found that the reduced activity of 19-norD2 was evident only when the analog was present during both the differentiation and activation phases. Cultures differentiated with 19-norD2 could be activated by 1,25(OH)2D3 to resorb bone as well as cultures treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 in both phases, suggesting that the limitation in the action of 19-norD2 could be rapidly reversed by 1,25(OH)2D3. However, cultures differentiated with 1,25(OH)2D3 could resorb bone normally when treated with 19-norD2 during the activation phase, suggesting that the reduced activity of 19-norD2 could not be manifested within the 5-d activation phase. At least one explanation for these findings is that the reduced resorption by 19-norD2 requires a prolonged exposure to the analog. This would be consistent with our in vivo observation that calcium mobilization from bone within 24 h of injection is similar for 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3, whereas after 7 daily injections, there is a clear difference in the calcemic response by the bone (12).

The dose-response curves for 1,25(OH)2D3 and 19-norD2 for TRAP+ cell formation and bone resorption showed maximum stimulation for each compound at 10 nM. This indicated that the diminished action of 19-norD2 on bone resorption probably was not due simply to a shift in the concentration-dependence curve. In fact, the VDR affinity of 19-norD2 is only slightly lower (one third less) than that of 1,25(OH)2D3 (3).

The mechanism(s) responsible for the lower in vitro bone resorbing activity of 19-norD2 is not clear. One possible explanation, a more rapid catabolism of 19-norD2, was investigated. The analog was degraded slightly more rapidly than 1,25(OH)2D3, and although this may contribute to the lower activity of 19-norD2, it is unlikely that this could explain fully the disparity in bone resorption elicited by the two compounds. The activities of vitamin D analogs can also be greatly influenced by their affinities for the serum DBP. This protein can significantly retard cellular uptake of vitamin D compounds that bind with high affinity. This mechanism cannot explain the low in vitro bone resorbing activity of 19-norD2 because its DBP affinity is only slightly lower (one third less) than that of 1,25(OH)2D3.

There is also evidence that some vitamin D analogs bind to the VDR differently than 1,25(OH)2D3, producing a functionally altered conformation in the receptor that can influence its activity and/or the recruitment of coactivators (18,19,20,21). Conformational changes in the VDR upon binding of 19-norD2 has not been examined.

The bone resorbing action of 1,25(OH)2D3 does not involve a direct stimulation of the osteoclast but is mediated indirectly by a factor released by the osteoblast. Recent studies have identified this osteoclast differentiation factor as osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL) (22,23,24), a protein on the surface of the osteoblast that is induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 (25,26). Interaction of OPGL with a receptor (receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B [RANK]) on osteoclast precursors induces maturation. In addition, binding of OPGL to RANK on mature osteoclasts is involved in 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated activation of bone resorption. Other factors can also influence osteoclast formation and activity. One of these, osteoprotegerin, binds to osteoclast differentiation factor and prevents its interaction with the receptor on the osteoclast (27,28). OPG expression is downregulated by 1,25(OH)2D3. It is the ratio of OPGL/OPG that determines both the rate of maturation of osteoclast precursors and the degree of activation of osteoclastic bone resorption.

A potential mechanism to explain our results is that 19-norD2 produces a lower OPGL/OPG ratio. This lower ratio may still produce a full effect on differentiation (at least cell fusion and induction of TRAP expression) but is unable to activate fully the mature osteoclasts. In fact, Lacey et al. (22) found that maturation of osteoclast precursors requires lower levels of OPGL than are needed for activation of resorption. In the present study, when the cultures were switched from 1,25(OH)2D3 (in the differentiation phase) to 19-norD2 (during the activation phase), the OPGL/OPG ratio may have changed so slowly that the rate of bone resorption was not markedly less than with 1,25(OH)2D3 present during the activation phase. Only when the OPGL/OPG ratio was low at the onset of the activation phase, i.e., when 19-norD2 was present during the differentiation phase, and remained low was there a substantial reduction in bone resorption. This model also suggests that when cells were differentiated with 19-norD2 and then activated by 1,25(OH)2D3, the OPGL/OPG ratio increased rapidly enough to activate resorption nearly as effectively as when the cultures were treated with 1,25(OH)2D3 in both phases. This hypothesis, which is based our current understanding of the mechanism by which vitamin D compounds mediate the maturation and activation of osteoclasts, remains to be tested.

In summary, we have demonstrated an impairment of bone resorption in vitro by 19-norD2. Although the mechanism for the disparate effects of the analog and 1,25(OH)2D3 are not known, the mouse bone marrow culture model will facilitate the determination of the molecular basis for the blunted calcemic actions of 19-norD2 on bone. In addition, structure/activity studies in this model may define modifications to vitamin D analogs that reduce their calcemic effect on bone and enhance their selectivity, providing safer, more effective therapeutic agents.


    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported in part by The National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease (Grant Nos. DK-09976, DK-30178, and DK-07126) and by a research grant from Abbott Laboratories.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Slatopolsky E, Delmez JA: Pathogenesis of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nephrol Dial Transplant11 : 130-135,1996
  2. Silver J, Naveh-Many T, Mayer H, Schmelzer HJ, Popovtzer MM: Regulation by vitamin D metabolites of parathyroid hormone gene transcription in vivo in the rat. J Clin Invest78 : 1296-1301,1986
  3. Slatopolsky E, Finch J, Ritter C, Denda M, Morrissey J, Brown A, DeLuca H: A new analog of calcitriol, 19-nor-1,25-(OH)2D2, suppresses parathyroid hormone secretion in uremic rats in the absence of hypercalcemia. Am J Kidney Dis 26:852 -860, 1995[Medline]
  4. Martin KJ, Gonzales EA, Gellens M, Hamm LL, Abboud H, Lindberg J: 19-Nor-1{alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 (Paricalcitol) safely and effectively reduces the levels of intact parathyroid hormone in patients on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol9 : 1427-1432,1998[Abstract]
  5. Brown AJ, Ritter CR, Finch JL, Morrissey J, Martin KJ, Murayama E, Nishii Y, Slatopolsky E: The noncalcemic analogue of vitamin D, 22-oxacalcitriol, suppresses parathyroid hormone synthesis and secretion. J Clin Invest 84:728 -732, 1989
  6. Kurokawa K, Akizawa T, Suzuki M, Akiba T, Ogata E, Slatopolsky E: Effect of 22-oxacalcitriol on hyperparathyroidism of dialysis patients: Results of a preliminary study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:121 -124, 1996
  7. Tan AU Jr, Levine BS, Mazess RB, Kyllo DM, Bishop CW, Knutson JC, Kleinman KS, Coburn JW: Effective suppression of parathyroid hormone by 1 alpha-hydroxy-vitamin D2 in hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Kidney Int51 : 317-323,1997[Medline]
  8. Okano T, Tsugawa N, Masuda S, Takeuchi A, Kobayashi T, Nishii Y: Protein-binding properties of 22-oxa-1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, a synthetic analogue of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol35 : 529-533,1989
  9. Dusso AS, Negrea L, Gunawardhana S, Lopez-Hilker S, Finch J, Mori T, Nishii Y, Slatopolsky E, Brown AJ: On the mechanisms for the selective action of vitamin D analogs. Endocrinology128 : 1687-1692,1991[Abstract]
  10. Brown AJ, Finch J, Grieff M, Ritter C, Kubodera N, Nishii Y, Slatopolsky E: The mechanism for the disparate actions of calcitriol and 22-oxacalcitriol in the intestine. Endocrinology133 : 1158-1164,1993[Abstract]
  11. Brown AJ, Finch J, Takahashi F, Ritter CS, Slatopolsky E: Distinct mechanisms for the selective actions of two vitamin D analogs, 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D2 and 22-oxa-1,25(OH)2D3, on the parathyroid glands [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:571A , 1997
  12. Brown AJ, Finch JL, Takahashi F, Slatopolsky E: The calcemic activity of 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D2 decreases with duration of treatment: Evidence for induced resistance [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 562A,1998
  13. Takahashi N, Yamana H, Yoshiki S, Roodman GD, Mundy GR, Jones SJ, Boyde A, Suda T: Osteoclast-like cell formation and its regulation by osteotropic hormones in mouse bone marrow cultures. Endocrinology 122:1373 -1382, 1988[Abstract]
  14. Holliday LS, Dean AD, Greenwald JE, Gluck SL: C-type natriuretic peptide increases bone resorption in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated mouse bone marrow cultures. J Biol Chem 270:18983 -18989, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Holliday LS, Welgus HG, Fliszar CJ, Veith GM, Jeffrey JJ, Gluck SL: Initiation of osteoclast bone resorption by interstitial collagenase. J Biol Chem 272:22053 -22058, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Brown AJ, Berkoben M, Ritter CS, Slatopolsky E: Binding and metabolism of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in cultured bovine parathyroid cells. Endocrinology130 : 276-281,1992[Abstract]
  17. Finch JL, Brown AJ, Slatopolsky E: Differential effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 19-nor-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 on calcium and phosphorus resorption in bone. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:980 -985, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Peleg S, Sastry M, Collins ED, Bishop JE, Norman AW: Distinct conformational changes induced by 20-epi analogues of 1{alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 are associated with enhanced activation of the vitamin D receptor. J Biol Chem270 : 10551-10558,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Takeyama K, Masuhiro Y, Fuse H, Endoh H, Murayama A, Kitanaka S, Suzawa M, Yanagisawa J, Kato S: Selective interaction of vitamin D receptor with transcriptional co-activators by a vitamin D analog. Mol Cell Biol 19:1049 -1055, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yang W, Freedman LP: 20-Epi analogues of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 are highly potent inducers of DRIP coactivator complex binding to the vitamin D receptor. J Biol Chem274 : 16838-16848,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Quack M, Carlberg C: Selective recognition of vitamin D receptor conformations mediates promoter selectivity of vitamin D analogs. Mol Pharmacol 55:1077 -1087, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MH, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ: Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165 -176, 1998[Medline]
  23. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Yamaguchi K, Kinosaki M, Mochizuki S, Tomoyasu A, Yano K, Goto M, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Suda T: Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA95 : 3597-3602,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fuller K, Wong, B, Fox S, Choi YW, Chambers TJ: TRANCE is necessary and sufficient for osteoblast-mediated activation of bone resorption in osteoclasts. J Exp Med 188:997 -1001, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Tsukii K, Shima N, Mochizuki S, Yamaguchi K, Kinosaki M, Yano K, Shibata O, Udagawa N, Yasuda H, Suda T, Higashio K: Osteoclast differentiating factor mediates an essential signal for bone resorption induced by 1{alpha},25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, prostaglandin E2, or parathyroid hormone in the microenvironment of bone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246:337 -341, 1998[Medline]
  26. Horwood NJ, Elliott J, Martin TJ, Gillespie MT: Osteotropic agents regulate the expression of osteoclast differentiation factor and osteoprotegerin in osteoblastic stromal cells. Endocrinology 139:4743 -4746, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, Luthy R, Nguyen HQ, Wooden S, Bennett L, Boone T, Shimamoto G, Derose M, Elliott R, Colombero A, Tan HL, Trail G, Sullivan J, Davy E, Bucay N, Renshaw-Gegg L, Hughes TM, Hill D, Pattison W, Campbell P, Sander S, Boyle WJ: Osteoprotegerin: A novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89:309 -319, 1998
  28. Hofbauer LC, Dunstan CR, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL, Khosla S: Osteoprotegerin production by human osteoblast lineage cells is stimulated by vitamin D, bone morphogenetic protein-2 and cytokines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 250:776 -781, 1998[Medline]
Received for publication November 15, 1999. Accepted for publication March 20, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Falcao Pedrosa Costa, L. Machado dos Reis, M. Custodio Ribeiro, R. Maria Affonso Moyses, and V. Jorgetti
Effects of calcitriol on parathyroid function and on bone remodelling in secondary hyperparathyroidism
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 743 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. L. FINCH, A. S. DUSSO, T. PAVLOPOULOS, and E. A. SLATOPOLSKY
Relative Potencies of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and 19-Nor-1,25-(OH)2D2 on Inducing Differentiation and Markers of Bone Formation in MG-63 Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2001; 12(7): 1468 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. J. BROWN, J. FINCH, F. TAKAHASHI, and E. SLATOPOLSKY
Calcemic Activity of 19-Nor-1,25(OH)2D2 Decreases with Duration of Treatment
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2000; 11(11): 2088 - 2094.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLLIDAY, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLLIDAY, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, A. J.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP