| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
Renal Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Correspondence to Dr. Alex J. Brown, Box 8126, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: 314-362-8232; Fax: 314-362-8237; E-mail: abrown{at}imgate.wustl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Correction of secondary hyperparathyroidism involves normalizing serum
phosphate, usually with calcium-based phosphate binders that retard intestinal
absorption of dietary phosphate, and restoration of the
1,25(OH)2D3 levels by replacement therapy. However, the
potent calcemic actions of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the intestine
and bone often produce hypercalcemia in renal patients, especially in those
who receive oral calcium. To overcome this limitation of
1,25(OH)2D3 therapy, less-calcemic vitamin D analogs
have been developed to retain the direct action of
1,25(OH)2D3 to suppress PTH gene expression. These
include 19-nor-1,25(OH)2D2 (19-norD2, or
paricalcitol)
(4,5,6,7),
22-oxacalcitriol (OCT)
(8,9,10),
and 1
(OH)2 (Hectorol, Bone Care International, Madison, WI)
(11,
12). 19-norD2 and
OCT have been shown to exert a selective action on PTH in animal models of
renal failure, i.e., suppression of PTH levels with less
hypercalcemia
(4,8).
The mechanisms by which these analogs exert this selectivity on the parathyroid glands are under investigation. The low calcemic activity of OCT seems to be due to its altered pharmacokinetics (13,14,15,16). Its low serum vitamin D binding protein (DBP) affinity leads to rapid clearance but greater tissue accessibility. The transient appearance of OCT in target tissues after injection elicits only short-lived effects on intestinal calcium absorption and bone mobilization but a prolonged suppression of PTH gene expression (16).
The mechanism for the selectivity of 19-norD2 is not clear. This analog has been shown to be approximately 10 times less calcemic than 1,25(OH)2D3 in the rat (4), commensurate with a 10-fold lower potency in stimulating intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization (17). In the present study, we investigated further the calcemic activities of 19-norD2 in the intestine and bone. Our data indicate an induced or acquired resistance to 19-norD2 with chronic treatment that cannot be attributed to pharmacokinetics.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pharmacokinetics
Normal male rats (250 g) were injected with
[3H]-1,25(OH)2D3 or
[3H]-19-norD2 (600 pmol, 0.5 mCi) and killed by
exsanguination at the specified times. The amount of tritiated parent compound
remaining in the blood was determined by normal phase HPLC as described
previously (16). The
parathyroid glands, one kidney, bone marrow from one femur, and the mucosa of
the first 8 cm of the small intestine were dissolved in tissue solubilizer
(BTS-450, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA), and the tritium was determined
by liquid scintillation. The data are expressed as disintegrations per minute
per gram of tissue.
Intestinal VDR Content
The first 6 cm of the duodenum was removed and flushed with saline, trimmed
of mesentery, and slit lengthwise. The mucosa was isolated by scraping with a
cold microscope slide and washed three times in cold phosphate-buffered saline
containing 200 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. The mucosa was then
homogenized in 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate, 5
mM dithiothreitol, and 200 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and centrifuged
at 100,000 x g for 60 min. Aliquots of the supernatant (100 ml,
100 µg protein) were incubated with
[3H]-1,25(OH)2D3 (2 nM final concentration)
with or without 500 nM unlabeled 1,25(OH)2D 3 for 16 h
at 4°C. The samples were then mixed with charcoal/dextran, placed on ice
for 15 min, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 x g. The
VDR-bound [3H]-1,25(OH)2D3 in the supernatant
was measured by liquid scintillation. Specific binding was determined by
subtracting the nonspecific binding
([3H-1,25(OH)2D3 plus unlabeled
1,25(OH)2D3) from the total binding
([3H]-1,25(OH)2D3 alone).
Statistical Analyses
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or SEM as denoted. Differences
between experimental groups were determined by t test and by ANOVA as
designated in the figure legends.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Calcemic Activities after Single Injections of 19-norD2
and 1,25(OH)2D3
To examine further the calcemic actions of 19-norD2 in these
tissues, we measured the effects of the compounds on intestinal calcium
transport and bone calcium mobilization using the vitamin Ddeficient
rat model. The lower basal rate of calcium transport in vitamin
Ddeficient rats permits a better assessment of stimulation by vitamin D
compounds. Two d before treatment, the vitamin Ddeficient rats were
placed on a vitamin Ddeficient, calcium-deficient diet, which allowed
for the assessment of bone resorption by the increase in serum calcium. The
rats were given single intraperitoneal injections of 19-norD2 or
1,25(OH)2D3 at doses of 60 or 600 pmol. After 24 h,
intestinal calcium transport was measured by the isolated duodenal loop method
in which 45Ca is introduced into the duodenal loop and
45Ca uptake into the blood is measured 10 min later. As shown in
Figure 3, after a single
intraperitoneal injection, 19-norD2 and
1,25(OH)2D3 elicited similar dose-dependent increases in
calcium transport. Increments in serum calcium were also similar
(Figure 4), indicating that
19-norD2 was as potent as 1,25(OH)2D3 in
stimulating bone resorption.
|
|
Calcemic Activities of 19-norD2 and
1,25(OH)2D3: 7-D Time Course
The equivalent calcemic activities of 19-norD2 and
1,25(OH)2D3 after a single injection seemed to disagree
with the lower calcemic activity of 19-norD2 observed in other,
more chronic studies. Therefore, a detailed time course of the calcemic
response to 19-norD2 was performed. Normal rats received
intraperitoneal injections of 240 pmol of 19-norD2 or
1,25(OH)2D3 every other day for 7 d. Serum calcium was
measured 24 h after each injection. Figure
5 shows that 19-norD2 and
1,25(OH)2D3 produced the same increment in serum calcium
after the first injection. However, with subsequent injections, a divergence
in the serum calcium curves was observed. By 5 and 7 d, the serum calcium
levels were significantly different.
|
Calcemic Activities after Seven Daily Injections of
19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3
To determine whether the divergence in the calcemic response is due to
differential effects of 19-norD2 and
1,25(OH)2D3 on intestinal calcium transport and/or bone
mobilization, vitamin Ddeficient rats were placed on a vitamin D
and calcium-deficient diet and given seven daily intraperitoneal injections of
600 pmol of 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3.
Intestinal calcium transport was assayed 24 h after the final injection, and
serum calcium was measured as a cumulative assessment of bone mobilization.
With 7 d of treatment, 19-norD2 elicited smaller increases in
intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization
(Figure 6) than
1,25(OH)2D3.
|
Pharmacokinetics after Seven Daily Injections of 19-norD2
and 1,25(OH)2D3
The reason for the lower calcemic activity of 19-norD2 with
chronic treatment was unclear, but a change in pharmacokinetics was a
possibility. Therefore, normal rats were given daily intraperitoneal
injections of 600 pmol of 19-norD2 or
1,25(OH)2D3 for 7 d. On the last day, the dose was
spiked with 0.5 mCi of the tritiated form of each compound. Serum levels and
tissue accumulation of the tritium was determined over a 24-h period.
Figure 7 shows that
19-norD2 was cleared slightly faster than
1,25(OH)2D3, as seen after a single injection
(Figure 1). However,
Figure 8 shows that the time
courses of localization of the two compounds to the intestine and bone were
similar, despite the different calcemic activities. Thus, the lower calcemic
actions of 19-norD2 in the intestine and bone after chronic
treatment could not be attributed to a change in its pharmacokinetics.
|
|
Intestinal VDR Levels after 7-D Treatment with 19-norD2 or
1,25(OH)2D3
At least one explanation for the decreased response to 19-norD2
with chronic treatment is that the analog downregulates the VDR. To assess
this possibility, we measured the intestinal VDR content in the normal rats
that received 240 pmol of 19-norD2 or
1,25(OH)2D3 every other day for 1 wk (see
Figure 5). The levels of
intestinal VDR, assessed by binding assay, were not different for the
19-norD2treated and
1,25(OH)2D3-treated rats (203 ± 38
versus 183 ± 18 fmol/mg protein, respectively). Thus, the
altered response to 19-norD2 did not seem to involve changes in the
VDR levels.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-(OH)D2 in the United
States and OCT in Japan. The selectivity of these compounds on the parathyroid
glands seems to be due to their lower calcemic activity rather than to
enhanced potency to suppress PTH. The mechanisms that are responsible for the low calcemic activity of these vitamin D analogs are under investigation. The best characterized analog to date is OCT. This compound has a 500-fold lower affinity than 1,25(OH)2D3 for the serum vitamin D binding protein, leading to more rapid clearance and shorter residence time in target tissues (13, 14, 16). At the same time, the decreased interaction with DBP allows greater accessibility to target cells, which results in higher peak tissue levels (14, 16). The shorter residence time of OCT in the target tissue produces a more transient stimulation of intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization than 1,25(OH)2D3 (16). However, despite the more rapid disappearance of OCT from the parathyroid glands (14), this analog elicits a prolonged suppression of PTH (19). Altered pharmacokinetics likely play a key role in the low calcemic activities of other vitamin D analogs with low DBP affinity, such as calcipotriene (Dovonex, Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ballerup, Denmark), which is approved for the treatment of psoriasis (20,21).
The present study demonstrates that the lower calcemic activity of 19-norD2 cannot be attributed to altered pharmacokinetics. The DBP affinity of 19-norD2 is only three times lower than that of 1,25(OH)2D3, and its clearance rate and tissue localization are not different from that of 1,25(OH)2D3. This is true with both acute and chronic administration of the analog. The similar effects on intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization after a single intraperitoneal injection of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 were consistent with the nearly identical localization of the compounds in intestine and bone. However, despite similar pharmacokinetics at the end of 7 d of treatment, 19-norD2 elicited smaller increases in intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization than 1,25(OH)2D3.
These findings suggest that with chronic treatment, the responses to 19-norD2 in the intestine and bone are diminished. The mechanism for this apparent resistance is unclear. One possibility is that chronic treatment induces rapid intracellular catabolism of 19-norD2 in the intestine and bone, thereby reducing the availability of the analog to the vitamin D receptor. In fact, we have noted that 19-norD2 is catabolized slightly more rapidly than 1,25(OH)2D3 in primary cultures of mouse bone marrow (22), but the difference is small and probably cannot fully account for the differential effects of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 in that system. Determining the relative rates of catabolism of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 in target tissues in vivo is very difficult, if not impossible. However, analysis of the tritium present in the intestine revealed very little tritiated metabolites of either compound; greater than 90% of the tritium was parent 19-norD2 or 1,25(OH)2D3, indicating that the tissue content of the injected compounds was not different.
Other possible explanations for the apparent induced resistance to 19-norD2 were investigated. VDR content was not differentially affected by 7 d of administration of 19-norD2 versus 1,25(OH)2D3. A previous study in which 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 were administered for 2 mo demonstrated lower intestinal VDR content in the 19-norD2treated uremic rats (23). However, this difference was not evident after 1 wk in the present study. VDR functions as a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor (RXR) (24). It is not known whether 19-norD2 down-regulates RXR, and there is no evidence that vitamin D compounds regulate RXR expression. Some vitamin D analogs have been shown to bind to the VDR in a different manner than 1,25(OH)2D3, inducing in the receptor unique conformations that likely affect the function of the receptor (25,26,27,28). Whether 19-norD2 produces an altered VDR conformation has not been investigated, but the similar activities of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 in vitro and in vivo after a single injection make this possibility unlikely.
We previously showed that chronic treatment with 19-norD2 leads to a decrease in endogenous 1,25(OH)2D3 levels, presumably through effects on both synthesis and degradation of the natural vitamin D hormone. Although the time course for this suppression of endogenous 1,25(OH)2D3 by 19-norD2 has not been examined, earlier studies with the analog OCT demonstrated that the decrease was evident by 24 to 48 h after injection (29). Thus, endogenous 1,25(OH)2D3 levels in the 19-norD2treated rats would be expected to decrease just before the divergence of the calcemic actions of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 (Figure 5). In addition, the low levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the vitamin Ddeficient rats would be expected to fall even further with 19-norD2 treatment. Our observation that the calcemic activities of 19-norD2 in the intestine and bone decrease with chronic administration would be consistent with the hypothesis that 19-norD2 is not capable of supporting all of the actions of 1,25(OH)2D3 required for stimulation of intestinal calcium transport and bone mobilization. 19-norD2 is known to bind well to the VDR and to mimic all of the genomic responses of 1,25(OH)2D3, but its nongenomic activity has not been tested. It is possible that depletion of endogenous 1,25(OH)2D3 levels reduces the activation of the membrane receptor for 1,25(OH)2D3 (30,31,32), thus reducing the activity of key pathways required for the calcemic responses in the bone and intestine. The apparent lack of a requirement of the nongenomic actions to suppress PTH may explain the therapeutic advantage of 19-norD2 in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Additional studies are necessary to test this hypothesis.
The lack of a role for pharmacokinetics in the low calcemic activity of chronically administered 19-norD2 suggests the possibility that the disparate calcemic actions of 19-norD2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 observed in vivo may be reproduced in vitro. Recent data obtained in mouse bone marrow cultures indicated that 19-norD2 was less active than 1,25(OH)2D3 in stimulating in vitro bone resorption (22), and this differential effect seemed to be dependent on time of incubation. Determining whether the mechanism for the reduced bone resorption by 19-norD2 in vitro is responsible for the diminished resorbing activity of the analog in vivo will require a clearer understanding of the factors involved.
In summary, we found that acute administration of 19-norD2 produces the same calcemic responses in the intestine and bone as 1,25(OH)2D3 but that with more chronic treatment, 19-norD2 becomes less calcemic than 1,25(OH)2D3. The mechanism that is responsible for this seeming induced resistance to the analog is not clear but seems not to involve pharmacokinetics or lower levels of the VDR. Therefore, it is important to establish which target tissues and genes may be differentially affected by acute versus chronic treatment with 19-norD2. However, the high activity of 19-norD2 in the parathyroid glands with chronic treatment allows this vitamin D analog to suppress PTH selectively, providing a new agent for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic renal failure.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 (Paricalcitol) safely and
effectively reduces the levels of intact parathyroid hormone in patients on
hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol9
: 1427-1432,1998[Abstract]
,25(OH)2D3:
Past, present, and future. J Bone Miner Res13
: 1360-1369,1998[Medline]
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
and is involved in the rapid actions of the hormone.
Bone 23:S176
, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. P. How, D. L. Mason, and A. H. Lau Current Approaches in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2008; 21(3): 196 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Monier-Faugere, H. Mawad, and H. H. Malluche Opposite Effects of Calcitriol and Paricalcitol on the Parathyroid Hormone-(1-84)/Large Carboxy-Terminal-Parathyroid Hormone Fragments Ratio in Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1255 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Q Hudson Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease: Focus on Clinical Consequences and Vitamin D Therapies Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2006; 40(9): 1584 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Reichel Current treatment options in secondary renal hyperparathyroidism Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 23 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Teng, M. Wolf, E. Lowrie, N. Ofsthun, J. M. Lazarus, and R. Thadhani Survival of Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis with Paricalcitol or Calcitriol Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., July 31, 2003; 349(5): 446 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Drueke and D. A. McCarron Paricalcitol as Compared with Calcitriol in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis N. Engl. J. Med., July 31, 2003; 349(5): 496 - 499. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Steddon, N. J. Schroeder, and J. Cunningham Vitamin D analogues: how do they differ and what is their clinical role? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 1965 - 1967. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. FINCH, A. S. DUSSO, T. PAVLOPOULOS, and E. A. SLATOPOLSKY Relative Potencies of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and 19-Nor-1,25-(OH)2D2 on Inducing Differentiation and Markers of Bone Formation in MG-63 Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2001; 12(7): 1468 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |