Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PERSU, A.
Right arrow Articles by VERELLEN-DUMOULIN, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PERSU, A.
Right arrow Articles by VERELLEN-DUMOULIN, C.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:2285-2296, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

CF Gene and Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Expression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

ALEXANDRE PERSU*, OLIVIER DEVUYST*, NATHALIE LANNOY{dagger}, ROLAND MATERNE{ddagger}, GODELA BROSNAHAN§, PATRICIA A. GABOW§, YVES PIRSON* and CHRISTINE VERELLEN-DUMOULIN{dagger}

* Division of Nephrology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Medical School, Brussels, Belgium
{dagger} Center for Human Genetics and Medical Genetics Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, Medical School, Brussels, Belgium
{ddagger} Department of Radiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Medical School, Brussels, Belgium
§ Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.

Correspondence to Dr. Olivier Devuyst, Division of Nephrology, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: 32-2-764-18-55; Fax: 32-2-764-28-36; E-mail: devuyst{at}nefr.ucl.ac.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Disease-modifying genes might participate in the significant intrafamilial variability of the renal phenotype in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a chloride channel that promotes intracystic fluid secretion, and thus cyst progression, in ADPKD. The hypothesis that mutations of the CF gene, which encodes CFTR, might be associated with a milder renal phenotype in ADPKD was tested. A series of 117 unrelated ADPKD probands and 136 unaffected control subjects were screened for the 12 most common mutations and the frequency of the alleles of the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus of CF. The prevalence of CF mutations was not significantly different in the ADPKD (1.7%, n = 2) and control (3.7%, n = 5) groups. The CF mutation was {Delta}F508 in all cases, except for one control subject (1717-1G A). The frequencies of the 5T, 7T, and 9T intron 8 alleles were also similar in the ADPKD and control groups. Two additional patients with ADPKD and the {Delta}F508 mutation were detected in the families of the two probands with CF mutations. Kidney volumes and renal function levels were similar for these four patients with ADPKD and {Delta}F508 CFTR (heterozygous for three and homozygous for one) and for control patients with ADPKD collected in the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center database. The absence of a renal protective effect of the homozygous {Delta}F508 mutation might be related to the lack of a renal phenotype in CF and the variable, tissue-specific expression of {Delta}F508 CFTR. Immunohistochemical analysis of a kidney from the patient with ADPKD who was homozygous for the {Delta}F508 mutation substantiated that hypothesis, because CFTR expression was detected in 75% of cysts (compared with <50% in control ADPKD kidneys) and at least partly in the apical membrane area of cyst-lining cells. These data do not exclude a potential protective role of some CFTR mutations in ADPKD but suggest that it might be related to the nature of the mutation and renal expression of the mutated CFTR.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited nephropathy, with an estimated prevalence of 1/1000 among Caucasians. The disease is characterized by the development of multiple cysts within the kidney, which are inconsistently associated with extrarenal manifestations, including liver and pancreatic cysts and intracranial aneurysms. The typical course of ADPKD involves the slow enlargement of renal cysts over decades, leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the majority of patients (generally near the fifth decade of life) (1). One of the most striking features of ADPKD is substantial interfamilial and intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneity, as evidenced by wide variability in the age at ESRD, ranging from infancy to old age (2, 3).

Interfamilial phenotypic variability in ADPKD may be accounted for by genetic heterogeneity. Mutations in the PKD1 gene (16p 13.3) cause the disease in approximately 85% of families (4), and mutations in PKD2 (4q21-23) account for the vast majority of remaining cases (5). Although the phenotypes caused by mutations in PKD1 and PKD2 are very similar, they differ in severity, because ESRD occurs an average of 15 yr earlier in type 1 ADPKD (6). Interfamilial phenotypic variability in ADPKD could also result from the nature of the mutation itself (7). The severity of renal disease may differ widely among affected members within given families, even between nonidentical twins (8). This could be explained by at least two mechanisms, i.e., a second hit event or modifying genes. Because cyst formation seems to be triggered by a somatic mutation in the normal PKD1/PKD2 allele (9, 10), the random nature of this phenomenon could provide a valuable explanation. However, the existence of modifying loci has been demonstrated in animal models of polycystic kidney disease (11, 12). These putative modifier genetic backgrounds might affect either cystogenesis itself or clinical conditions (such as hypertension) that are associated with disease progression (13). The first example of the effect of a modifying gene in human ADPKD is the association of the DD genotype of the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism with worse renal prognoses (14).

Several lines of evidence have demonstrated that abnormal fluid secretion across cystic epithelium is a key factor in ADPKD cyst progression (for review, see reference 15). This process seems to be driven by transepithelial, cAMP-regulated chloride secretion, which is mediated by cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), the protein encoded by the CF gene (recently renamed ABCC7 for "ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C, member 7") (16). CFTR is a 1480-amino acid integral membrane protein that contains an ATP-binding cassette domain and functions as both a chloride channel and a conductance regulator (17). CFTR mutations, resulting in functional defects in secretory epithelia (such as that in the respiratory tract, the intestine, or the exocrine pancreas), account for CF, which is the most common lethal autosomal recessive disease among Caucasians (16).

Although significant CFTR expression has been detected in the tubular epithelium lining various nephron segments in fetal and adult kidney (18,19,20), there is no overt renal phenotype in patients with CF (16). In contrast, the frequent occurrence of abnormalities of the Wolffian duct among subjects with various mutations or the T5 polymorphism in intron 8 of CF (21,22,23) suggests that CFTR is involved in the embryonic development of the male genital duct, a structure that includes the ureteric bud (24).

Strong CFTR expression in the apical area of ADPKD cyst-lining cells has been documented (25, 26), and functional studies have demonstrated the role of CFTR in chloride secretion and cyst fluid accumulation (25, 27). Therefore, a loss of CFTR function, such as occurs in CF, would be expected to slow cyst growth and attenuate the ADPKD phenotype. This hypothesis was supported by a recent report of a family with both ADPKD and CF (28); the ADPKD phenotype seemed to be less severe for the two patients affected by both ADPKD and CF, compared with members of the family without CF.

To investigate the potential disease-modifying role of the CF gene in ADPKD, we performed systematic screening for 12 of the most common mutations and for the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus of CF in a large series of unrelated patients with ADPKD and control subjects. These analyses allowed the detection of {Delta}F508 mutations in two families with ADPKD, which were further investigated for genotype-phenotype correlations. A molecular mechanism that might account for these correlations is proposed, on the basis of the expression patterns of wild-type versus {Delta}F508 CFTR in ADPKD kidneys.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients with ADPKD and Control Subjects
The index patients from all families with ADPKD that were observed in the Division of Nephrology, St. Luc Academic Hospital (Brussels, Belgium), between September 1994 and December 1998 were included in this study. The diagnosis of ADPKD was established on the basis of familial history and detection of a minimal number of cysts in ultrasonographic examinations, according to age (29). Subsets of patients with ADPKD, i.e., slow and rapid progressors, were defined by the occurrence of ESRD before the age of 40 yr or after the age of 60 yr, respectively. Patients with known type 2 ADPKD were excluded from the study; therefore, our population consisted mainly of patients with type 1 ADPKD (1, 3). Control subjects included individuals seeking genetic counseling (Center for Human Genetics, Brussels, Belgium), unrelated spouses of patients with ADPKD, and subjects used as control subjects in previous studies, without familial histories of ADPKD or CF. Informed oral consent was obtained from all patients and control subjects, and the use of DNA samples has been approved by the Université Catholique de Louvain Ethical Review Board.

DNA Extraction and Genotyping
DNA was isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes using the NaCl extraction procedure and conventional techniques (30). Mutation and polymorphism analyses were performed with different PCR amplifications. Genomic DNA samples were screened using the Elucigene CF12 kit (based on Amplification Refractory Mutation System technology; Zeneca Diagnostics, Abingdon, UK), to detect the following 12 CFTR mutations: 1717-1G A, G542X, W1282X, N1303K, {Delta}F508, 3849+10kbC T, 621+1G T, R553X, G551D, R117H, R1162X, and R334W. The characteristics of these mutations are shown in Table 1. The studied mutations accounted for approximately 85% of the alleles causing CF in the Belgian population (31, 32).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of the 12 mutations of the CF gene screened for among the patients with ADPKD and the control subjectsa
 

The length of the intron 8 polythymidine tract (which may contain five, seven, or nine thymidines, corresponding to the 5T, 7T, and 9T alleles, respectively) was investigated using the nested-PCR method, followed by electrophoresis (33). Exon 9 was amplified with primers CFTR.Exon 9.1 and CFTR.Exon 9.2 (34). The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 52°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, for 34 cycles. The reaction mixture contained 2.5 µl of PCR buffer (100 mM Tris-HCL, 15 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl [pH 8.3]), 200 µM concentrations of each dNTP, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1 unit of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT), in a final volume of 25 µl containing 100 ng of genomic DNA. To amplify the polypyrimidine sequence, we performed a nested PCR with primers CFTR-19D9 and CFTR-E9R2 (22). The conditions for the nested PCR were as described above, except that 1 µl from the first PCR was amplified with AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase and annealing and extension were performed at 54°C for 30 s and 74°C for 40 s, respectively. The stretch was determined using the Gene Scan 672 software of a Perkin-Elmer/Applied Biosystems 373A sequencer.

Linkage analyses for PKD1 and PKD2 were performed for the informative families of the slow progressor subset and for the two families with CF mutations (35, 36). Linkage to the PKD1 locus was investigated with 5'-flanking markers, i.e., 16AC2.5 (D16S291) and CW2 (D16S663) in the telomeric position, VK5.b (D16S94) and 218EP6 (D16S246) in the centromeric position, and the KG8 CA repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the gene (35). The microsatellites 16AC2.5, CW2, and KG8 were amplified using the conditions described previously (37); the former two were analyzed with Gene Scan 672 software. Hybridization with the biallelic probes VK5.b (MspI) and 218EP6 (PvuII) was performed by Southern blotting. Linkage to the PKD2 locus was analyzed with four microsatellite markers that flanked the gene on chromosome 4 (36).

Clinical Data and Assessment of Renal Volumes
The records for patients with ADPKD were reviewed for gender, geographical background (Belgium or southern Europe), age at the time of DNA sampling, and, if pertinent, age at the time of ESRD. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The evolution of renal function (1/creatinine concentration) with time for the two index patients was compared with that for five patients with ADPKD who were matched for age and gender and exhibited negative results in the screening for the 12 CF mutations.

Assessment of renal volumes for patients from the two families with CF mutations was performed with computed tomographic (CT) scanning. Unenhanced CT scans (200 mA, 120 kV) were obtained with a dual-detector helical CT unit (Twin RTS; Elscint, Haifa, Israel). The protocol consisted of volumetric data acquisition through the kidneys, with 5.5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.5. The images were reconstructed at 5-mm intervals. Volumetric measurements of the kidneys were performed with the summation-of-areas technique (38), using an Omnipro workstation (Elscint). The cross-sectional area of individual images was automatically calculated after manual tracing of the perimeter of each kidney with a computer mouse-driven stylus. The volume was then determined by multiplying the sum of all areas by the image thickness. Both creatinine clearance values and renal volumes were normalized for body surface area, for comparison with the large database on patients with ADPKD at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (28).

Immunocytochemical Localization of CFTR in ADPKD Kidneys
Tissue blocks were prepared from three ADPKD kidneys, as described (19, 25). The three samples were obtained at the time of nephrectomy for renal transplantation. One sample was obtained from the 33-yr-old son of index patient 2, who is affected with both type 1 ADPKD and CF ({Delta}F508/{Delta}F508) (Figure 1B, subject IV.3). Two control samples were obtained from patients with ADPKD (a 49-yr-old male patient and a 55-yr-old female patient) who tested negative for CF mutations. Before paraffin embedding, kidney samples were fixed for 12 h at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (Boehringer Ingelheim, Heidelberg, Germany) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Sections (6 µm thick) were rehydrated and incubated for 30 min with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide, to block endogenous peroxidase. After incubation for 20 min with 10% normal serum in phosphate-buffered saline, sections were incubated for 45 min with the anti-CFTR antibodies diluted in phosphate-buffered saline containing 2% bovine serum albumin. After washing, sections were incubated with the appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), washed again, and incubated for 45 min with avidin-biotinperoxidase complex (Vectastain Elite; Vector Laboratories). After washing, antibodies were detected using aminoethylcarbazole (Vector Laboratories). All incubations were at room temperature in a humidified chamber. Control experiments included incubation in the absence of primary antibody or with control rabbit or mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories). Sections were mounted in glycerol/water and viewed with a Leica DMR photomicroscope.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Pedigrees with PKD1 and CF genotypes. Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are shown as filled symbols. The probands are indicated by the arrows. The different haplotypes of the PKD1 locus are shown along the vertical bars. The {Delta}F508 genotype and the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus genotype are shown in the rectangles. -/-, wild-type; +/-, heterozygous {Delta}F508 mutation; +/+, homozygous {Delta}F508 mutation. (A) Pedigree of index patient 1. A patient with a history of uremia without clear demonstration of renal cysts is depicted as a hatched circle. For subject II.5, the PKD1 haplotype was inferred from the haplotypes of his wife and son. (B) Pedigree of index patient 2.

 

Two antibodies, raised against different domains of human CFTR, were used. Polyclonal antibody 169 (a gift from W. B. Guggino, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD) was raised against a peptide sequence within the R domain (residues 724 to 746), whereas monoclonal antibody MATG1031 (Transgène, Strasbourg, France) recognized a sequence in the first extracellular loop (residues 107 to 117). These two antibodies have been extensively characterized in human tissues, including normal and ADPKD kidneys (18, 19, 25).

Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Comparisons of results from different groups were performed using {chi}2 and Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Population Characteristics
Our series included 117 probands with ADPKD. The clinical characteristics of these patients are presented in Table 2, together with those of the control subjects. Within the ADPKD group, 20 and 15 patients met the criteria for slow and rapid progressors, respectively. Two-thirds of the patients with ADPKD had reached ESRD (mean age, 50 yr) by the time of DNA sampling. Gender ({chi}2 = 3.08, P = 0.08) and geographic background ({chi}2 = 0.22, P = 0.63) parameters were similar for the ADPKD and control groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Clinical characteristics and frequency of the wild-type ({Delta}F508 -/-) and mutated forms of the CF gene, in the heterozygous ({Delta}F508 +/-) and homozygous ({Delta}F508 +/+) states, among ADPKD probands (including the slow and rapid progressor subsets) and control subjectsa
 

CF Genotyping
All ADPKD probands and control subjects were screened for the 12 CF mutations detailed in Table 1. Two patients with ADPKD (one in the slow progressor subset) and five control subjects exhibited a heterozygous CF mutation, which was identified as {Delta}F508 for the two patients with ADPKD and four control subjects and 1717-1G A for one control subject (Table 2). The prevalence of CF mutations in the control group (3.7%) is similar to that reported in the literature (31, 32) and does not differ significantly from that observed for patients with ADPKD (1.7%) (Fisher's exact test, 0.46).

All subjects were also genotyped for the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus of CF (Table 3). The vast majority of ADPKD probands and control subjects harbored the 7T allele, with a distribution of the three alleles similar to that reported for the general population (21). Each patient with ADPKD or control subject who exhibited the {Delta}F508 mutation also bore the 9T allele, at least in the heterozygous state. The one control subject with the 1717-1G A mutation was homozygous for the 7T allele; this association was previously reported (21). Thirteen of the 117 ADPKD probands were heterozygous for the 5T allele. As shown in Table 4, these patients were similar to the 104 patients with only the 7T and/or 9T allele, in terms of demographic characteristics and progression to ESRD. The characteristics of the two ADPKD probands with the {Delta}F508 mutation, as well as further analyses of their families, are described below.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Allelic frequency of the 5T, 7T, and 9T alleles of the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus of CF in the ADPKD and control groups, compared with that reported by Kiesewetter et al. (21) for 224 normal chromosomes
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Clinical characteristics of the ADPKD probands according to CF genotypea
 

Additional Studies of the Two ADPKD Families with {Delta}F508 CFTR Mutations
Clinical Histories. The index patient from pedigree 1 (Figure 1A, subject III.4) was a 46-yr-old man. The diagnosis of ADPKD was made fortuitously by ultrasonographic examination at 30 yr of age, during a sterility evaluation that revealed poor-quality spermatozoa with mobility abnormalities (30% spermatozoa with progressive mobility). At the age of 35 yr, hypertension was detected, requiring treatment with atenolol and enalapril. At that time, serum creatinine levels were normal (1.2 mg/dl). At the age of 43 yr, serum creatinine levels were observed to be elevated (1.9 mg/dl) for the first time. The subsequent history included three episodes of cyst bleeding, without infection, and a coronary artery bypass graft. At the age of 45 yr, the serum creatinine levels for the patient were 4.3 mg/dl. His father (subject II.5) was also affected with ADPKD and began to undergo hemodialysis at the age of 54 yr. Two paternal uncles (subjects II.3 and II.13) and three paternal aunts (subjects II.2, II.10, and II.11) were also affected with ADPKD. His paternal grandmother (subject I.2) was reported to be dead as a result of uremia.

The index patient from pedigree 2 (Figure 1B, subject III.1) was a 63-yr-old man. The diagnosis of ADPKD was made at the age of 53 yr, during an evaluation for gross hematuria and lumbar pain. At that time, serum creatinine levels were normal. Two episodes of gross hematuria occurred subsequently. Serum creatinine levels were measured to be 2.9 mg/dl at the age of 59 yr and 4.8 mg/dl at the age of 60 yr; hemodialysis was initiated at the age of 61 yr. The patient experienced no known episodes of cyst infection or nephrolithiasis. His mother (subject II.2), one maternal aunt (subject II.3), and his maternal grandmother (subject I.2) died as a result of uremia, at the ages of 65, 50, and 70 yr, respectively. Index patient 2 has two sons with ADPKD (diagnosed for both by ultrasonographic and CT examinations), of age 37 yr (subject IV.1) and 34 yr (subject IV.3). Of note, subject IV.3 has both ADPKD and CF; the latter condition was diagnosed on the basis of a positive sweat test (performed because of repeated respiratory infections during childhood) and mutation analysis (see below). Because of the deterioration of his pulmonary condition, he underwent heart-lung transplantation at the age of 26 yr. At that time, serum creatinine levels were normal (0.6 mg/dl). After transplantation, renal function progressively deteriorated, leading to the initiation of hemodialysis at the age of 31 yr. Bilateral nephrectomy was performed at the time of renal transplantation, 1 yr later.

Genetic Analyses. Segregation analysis for PKD1 and PKD2 was performed for the two families with CF mutations. For both, linkage analysis allowed exclusion of PKD2 and was compatible with linkage to PKD1 (Figure 1).

Transmission of the {Delta}F508 mutation of the CF gene was examined in both families (Figure 2). The {Delta}F508 allele harbored by index patient 1 (subject III.4) was transmitted by his mother (subject II.6) (Figure 2A). The {Delta}F508 mutation harbored by index patient 2 (subject III.1) was observed in his two sons, in a heterozygous state in the elder (subject IV.1) and in a homozygous state in the younger (subject IV.3) (Figure 2B). Genotyping confirmed that their mother (subject III.2) harbored the {Delta}F508 mutation in the heterozygous state. All six patients from these families who were heterozygous (n = 5) or homozygous (n = 1) for the {Delta}F508 mutation harbored at least one 9T allele (Figure 1).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. {Delta}F508 genotype, determined using the Amplification Refractory Mutation System method (Zeneca Diagnostics). The upper (487-bp) and lower (97-bp) bands are control bands resulting from amplification of regions in the apolipoprotein B and ornithine decarboxylase genes, respectively. Lanes a, genes with the {Delta}F508 mutation (160 bp); lanes b, genes in which the {Delta}F508 mutation is not present (160 bp). The molecular weight marker (MW) is a 50-bp ladder. (A) Lanes 1a and 1b, mother of index patient 1; lanes 2a and 2b, index patient 1; lanes Ca and Cb, wild-type control subject. (B) Lanes 1a and 1b, index patient 2; lanes 2a and 2b, spouse of index patient 2; lanes 3a and 3b, younger son of index patient 2, with both cystic fibrosis (CF) and ADPKD; lanes 4a and 4b, elder son of index patient 2; lanes 5a and 5b, cousin of the proband; lanes Ca and Cb, wild-type control subject.

 

Correlations Between CF Genotype and ADPKD Phenotype. Renal function and volumes were assessed for the two patients with ADPKD and a heterozygous {Delta}F508 mutation (index patients 1 and 2). The decrease in renal function (expressed as 1/creatinine concentration with time) for these two patients was compared with that for five unrelated patients with ADPKD without the CF mutation, who were matched for age and gender (Figure 3A). The slope was steeper for both index patients than for ADPKD control subjects, i.e., -0.0042 versus -0.0028 for index patient 1 (Figure 3A, upper) and -0.0082 versus -0.0040 for index patient 2 (Figure 3A, lower). With the exception of the sterility documented for index patient 1, these two patients experienced classic courses of ADPKD. Representative CT scans obtained at the age of 45 yr for index patient 1 and 63 yr for index patient 2 are shown in Figure 3B. Note that hepatic cysts were absent for both patients.



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Evolution of renal function and kidney morphologic features for the index patients. (A) Decreases in renal function (1/creatinine concentration) with time for index patients 1 (upper) and 2 (lower) (both shown as thick lines integrating the individual values), compared with the average slope (thin lines) for five unrelated patients with ADPKD without CF mutations, who were matched with respect to age and gender (all individual values for the control subjects are shown as black triangles). (B) Computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained at the age of 45 yr for index patient 1 (upper) and 63 yr for index patient 2 (lower). These findings are typical of ADPKD.

 

When available, creatinine clearance and renal size values for patients with ADPKD and CF mutations were compared with data collected in the large database on patients with ADPKD at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (28) (Table 5). The index patient from pedigree 1 (subject III.4) was characterized by relatively poor renal function (only 16% of male patients with ADPKD of that age have lower renal function), together with very large kidneys (99th and 87th percentile for the left and right kidneys, respectively). The index patient from pedigree 2 (subject III.1) was in the average range for both parameters. His two sons exhibited similar impairments of renal function; the elder had smaller ADPKD kidneys than did his younger brother, who was affected by both ADPKD and CF. It must be noted that, for the latter, the renal function and volume parameters presented in Table 5 were recorded before the combined heart-lung transplant, i.e., before the initiation of cyclosporin-based immunosuppressive therapy. Six years later, at the time of nephrectomy (age of 32 yr), the kidneys were even more enlarged (left kidney, 1097 cm3, 93rd percentile; right kidney, 721 cm3, 62nd percentile).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Creatinine clearance values and kidney volumes for four patients with ADPKD and a {Delta}F508 CFTR mutationa
 

Pathologic Examination Results and Immunolocalization of CFTR. The pathologic examination of the kidneys removed from subject IV.3 from pedigree 2 (who is affected by both ADPKD and CF) demonstrated polycystic kidneys with multiple dilations of Bowman's spaces and glomerular cysts, as well as areas of atrophic tubules (Figure 4, A to D). Areas of noncystic parenchyma exhibited extensive fibrosis (sclerosis index, 4/6). Multiple small focal adenomas were identified within cysts; some cyst lumina were filled with neutrophils. No signs of acute cyclosporin toxicity were observed. Very mild arteriolar hyalinosis was present.



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Cystic phenotype and CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) expression in the kidneys from a patient with ADPKD and CF ({Delta}F508/{Delta}F508). (A) Representative CT scan, showing the severely enlarged multicystic kidneys of the patient with ADPKD and CF, at the age of 26 yr. (B to D) Low-power views of trichrome blue-stained sections obtained from one of those kidneys. At the time of nephrectomy (age of 32 yr), the kidney is massively invaded by cysts of different sizes (B and C), including several glomerular cysts (D). Magnification, x3.2 in B; x62 in C and D. (E and F) Sections stained with the polyclonal anti-CFTR antibody 169 (E) or the monoclonal antibody MATG1031 (F). A majority of cysts show positive immunoreactivity for CFTR. Note that section E is in series with section D. Magnification, x62. (G to I) Serial sections stained with the anti-CFTR antibody 169 (G), the anti-CFTR antibody MATG1031 (H), or control rabbit IgG (I). Specific staining for CFTR is detected in some cysts, with intracystic heterogeneity, irrespective of the nature of the antibody. Note that at least part of the CFTR staining is concentrated in the apical area of the cyst-lining cells, whereas diffuse intracellular staining is observed in other cells. Magnification, x350. (J and K) CFTR staining (antibody 169) in a glomerular cyst (J) and in cyst walls (K). Different staining patterns, including diffuse intracellular and apical immunoreactivity, are observed. Magnification, x250. (L) CFTR staining (antibody MATG1031), showing distinct apical reactivity in cyst-lining cells. Magnification, x360. (M and N) CFTR staining (antibody 169) in two control ADPKD kidneys without detected CF mutations. The staining patterns are heterogeneous, including both intracellular and apical area immunoreactivity, similar to those shown in G, H, K, and L. Magnification, x250.

 

Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that a majority of cysts were stained for CFTR (Figure 4, E and F); that observation was confirmed by systematic counting within 40 randomly selected fields, which demonstrated a positive immunoreaction in 75% of the cysts (153 of 203 cysts) examined. Typical inter- and intracystic heterogeneity in CFTR staining was observed, regardless of the anti-CFTR antibody used (Figure 4, G and H). No specific reactivity was observed when incubations were performed with control IgG (Figure 4I) or without primary antibody (data not shown). Strong CFTR staining was also observed in some of the glomerular cysts (Figure 4J). The CFTR staining pattern was either diffusely intracellular or concentrated in the apical area (Figure 4, G, H, K, and L). These characteristics are similar to those observed for ADPKD kidneys from patients without detected CF mutations (Figure 4, M and N) and those previously reported (25). The percentage of cysts stained for CFTR was 52% (142 of 273 cysts) in the two ADPKD kidneys without CF mutations.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The systematic screening for the 12 most common CF mutations in a large series of 117 unrelated ADPKD probands demonstrated that (1) the prevalence of CF mutations among patients with ADPKD is lower than that in the general population, although the difference does not reach statistical significance; (2) the existence of a {Delta}F508 mutation in a patient with ADPKD is not associated with a milder renal phenotype in either the heterozygous or homozygous state; and (3) the presence of the 5T allele of the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus, which is known to be associated with Wolffian duct abnormalities, is not associated with a milder ADPKD phenotype. In addition, the first detailed examination of kidneys from a patient with type 1 ADPKD and CF demonstrated not only a marked cystic phenotype but also the persistence of strong CFTR expression in the majority of cysts.

The relatively high prevalence of heterozygous CF mutations in the general population in European countries (16, 32) is in keeping with the 3.7% prevalence of mutations observed for our control group. Similarly, the allelic frequencies for the 5T, 7T, and 9T alleles of the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus of CF observed for our control subjects, as well as the association between these alleles and the two CF mutations described here, confirm the findings of a previous report (21). The prevalence of CF mutations among our series of 117 ADPKD probands (1.7%) was more than two times lower than that among our control subjects (3.7%). Although this difference did not reach statistical significance, the question arises of whether the association of ADPKD with CF might have a lethal effect. The existence of sterility resulting from spermatozoa of poor quality for one of the subjects with a {Delta}F508 mutation (index patient 1) must be noted. Indeed, the frequency of heterozygous carriers of CF mutations is increased among men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD), as well as among subjects with azoospermia resulting from other causes or with sperm of poor quality (39). The variable penetrance of the phenotype of infertility among heterozygous carriers of CF mutations could depend on the association with other variants of the gene, such as the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus. Whereas allele 5T of this locus seems to be involved in CBAVD (21,22,23), in conjunction with CF mutations or other CF variants (40), the genetic background involved in the occurrence of fertility problems among male heterozygous carriers of CF mutations without CBAVD is still unknown.

The existence of a {Delta}F508 mutation in two ADPKD probands allowed us to identify two other patients with ADPKD who harbored the same mutation in the heterozygous state. With the exception of documented sterility for one patient, the ADPKD phenotypes of these four patients were unremarkable. Compared with the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center database, their kidney size and creatinine clearance values displayed wide variability, ranging from the 16th to the 99th percentile (Table 5). This suggests that a heterozygous {Delta}F508 mutation in these patients does not affect the ADPKD phenotype, which is in agreement with the report by O'Sullivan et al. (28).

Examination of our patient with ADPKD and a homozygous {Delta}F508 mutation demonstrated that kidney involvement was similar to that observed for patients with ADPKD without CF. This patient exhibited an average ADPKD phenotype, as evidenced by kidney volume (particularly in comparison with his affected brother), creatinine clearance values, and morphologic examination results (extended cystic involvement). This absence of a protective effect of CF on ADPKD is in contrast to a previous report (28). Several explanations might account for this discrepancy. First, in view of the significant number of CF variants and the potential modifying role of variants located inside (21,40) or outside (14,41) the CF gene, the discrepancy could be attributable to different genetic backgrounds in the subjects described by O'Sullivan et al. (28) and us. Second, it could be related to the specific nature of the CF mutations detected. Indeed, the two patients with CF described by O'Sullivan et al. (28) each harbored a mutation known to reduce CFTR mRNA levels (stop codon within exon 3 and severe reduction in transcription for E60X; abnormal splicing for 3849+10kbC T) (16,28); for our {Delta}F508/{Delta}F508 patient, the problem involved abnormal protein folding, resulting in a presumed lack of CFTR at the apical membrane (42). Third, it is possible that the less severe phenotypes of the two subjects described by O'Sullivan et al. (28) were attributable to their younger age, compared with their heterozygous or wild-type relatives. This argument must be considered, keeping in mind that the aggregate median survival time for CF is still <30 yr (16).

In view of the well established role of CFTR in intracystic fluid secretion in ADPKD (15), the existence of a protective role of the {Delta}F508 mutation because of decreased expression of the mutated protein in cyst-lining epithelial cells was an attractive hypothesis. However, decreased expression of {Delta}F508 CFTR was demonstrated only in sweat glands and submucosal glands of the upper airways (43,44). The inference that decreased expression also occurs in other tissues was recently challenged by Kälin et al. (45), who demonstrated that the expression of {Delta}F508 CFTR is strikingly tissue-specific, ranging from undetectable in sweat glands to indistinguishable from that of the wild-type protein in the respiratory and intestinal tracts. These data suggest that the variable severity of CF in different organs might reflect heterogeneity of expression of the mutated CFTR. It is currently unknown whether the latter hypothesis applies to the kidney. However, given the lack of major renal involvement in CF (16,46), it is not unlikely that the expression of {Delta}F508 CFTR is normal or only moderately decreased in the kidney.

Our study substantiates this hypothesis, because immunocytochemical examination of CFTR in a kidney sample from a patient with type 1 ADPKD and CF demonstrated {Delta}F508 CFTR expression in approximately 75% of cysts. This fraction of CFTR-positive cysts is greater than that observed for patients with ADPKD without CF mutations (52%) and for patients with ADPKD in general (60%) (25). At the level of resolution achieved here, at least part of the {Delta}F508 CFTR immunoreactivity is concentrated in the apical membrane area. The staining pattern, including the significant inter- and intra- cystic heterogeneity, is similar to that previously reported (25) and that observed in patients with ADPKD without CF mutations (Figure 4). Keeping in mind the limitations of a single-sample examination, it is tempting to argue that the lack of a protective effect of the {Delta}F508 mutation in ADPKD reflects the fact that mutated CFTR expression remains stable in ADPKD cysts. By analogy with the studies of Kälin et al. (45), our findings might suggest that the {Delta}F508 mutation does not significantly impair the processing of CFTR in the kidney.

The amount of CFTR mRNA without exon 9 depends on the number of thymines in the polymorphic Tn sequence of intron 8. The 5T allele causes an increase in the number of CFTR mRNA transcripts that lack exon 9, which leads to a nonfunctional protein (47). The 5T allele has been associated with various genital, respiratory, and pancreatic phenotypes (21,22,48). Our study is the first to investigate the distribution of these alleles in patients with ADPKD. As shown in Table 4, we did not observe evidence for a protective effect of the 5T allele in ADPKD. However, we did not find patients homozygous for this rare allele or patients with both a 5T allele and a classic CF mutation. We did not look for the presence of alleles belonging to other loci, such as (TG)m and M470V, the combination of which might explain the penetrance of some mutations (40). Definitive exclusion of a protective effect of a particular combination of CF alleles would be a daunting task, given the highly polymorphic nature of that gene (32).

Even if it is confirmed, the lack of effect of the {Delta}F508 mutation on ADPKD phenotypes does not exclude a potential modifying role of the CF gene in ADPKD. It merely indicates that subjects with the {Delta}F508 mutation are not good models for assessment of this effect, as suggested by the possibility of tissue-specific regulation of mutated CFTR expression (45) and our demonstration of high {Delta}F508 CFTR reactivity in ADPKD cysts. The effects of a CF mutation affecting the single-channel properties of CFTR, rather than its processing, would be very interesting to examine. However, because {Delta}F508 represents 66% of the mutated alleles throughout the world (32), the chance of identifying an association between ADPKD and a rare mutation of CF is extremely small. Considerations of the role of CFTR in cyst growth must also take into account alternative mechanisms of chloride secretion in ADPKD cysts. Most of the morphologic and functional studies that support the role of CFTR in ADPKD have documented a striking heterogeneity in CFTR expression in the cells or cysts examined (25,27). It is possible that the expression and activity of CFTR in some cyst-lining cells are sufficient only to maintain a filled cyst or, alternatively, that transepithelial chloride secretion in ADPKD is mediated by different types of transporters (15,25).

In conclusion, we performed a wide screening of ADPKD probands, to assess the effects of CF mutations on kidney involvement. We did not observe a protective effect of {Delta}F508 (the most common CF mutation) on the renal ADPKD phenotype. This was also true for the 5T allele of the intron 8 polymorphic Tn locus, which has been previously associated with Wolffian duct abnormalities. Furthermore, we demonstrated, for the first time, nearly normal levels of expression of the {Delta}F508 CFTR in kidney cysts. These data do not exclude a potential protective role of some CFTR mutations in ADPKD but suggest that it might be related to the nature of the mutation and renal expression of the mutated CFTR.


    Acknowledgments
 
These studies were supported in part by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (crédit 9.4540.96), the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale (convention 3.4566.97), the Association Belge de Lutte contre la Mucoviscidose, the Alphonse et Jean Forton Foundation, and the Communauté Française de Belgique. We express our gratitude to V. E. Torres (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), C. Walon and F. Gérard (Center for Human Genetics, Brussels, Belgium), J.-P. Cosyns, B. Hallemans, S. Lagasse, and S. De Cooman (St. Luc Academic Hospital, Brussels, Belgium), L. De Pauw, R. Beauwens, I. Salmon, D. Baran, and D. Abramowicz (Erasme Academic Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium), and J. Bagon (Clinique St. Jean, Brussels, Belgium), for help in collecting samples and for valuable discussions.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Pirson Y, Chauveau D, Grünfeld JP: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. In: Oxford Textbook of Clinical Nephrology, 2nd Ed., edited by Cameron JS, Davison AM, Grünfeld JP, Kerr DNS, Ritz E, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp2393 -2415
  2. Milutinovic J, Rust PF, Fialkow PH, Agodoa LY, Phillips LA, Rudd TG, Sutherland S: Intrafamilial phenotypic expression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis19 : 465-472,1992[Medline]
  3. Ritz E, Zeier M, Waldherr R: Progression to renal insufficiency. In: Polycystic Kidney Disease, edited by Watson ML, Torres VE, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp430 -449
  4. European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium: The polycystic kidney disease 1 gene encodes a 14 kb transcript and lies within a duplicated region of chromosome 16. Cell77 : 881-894,1994[Medline]
  5. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhusien B, Saris JJ, Reynolds DM, Cai Y, Gabow PA, Pierides A, Kimberling WJ, Breuning MH, Deltas CC, Peters DJM, Somlo S: PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein. Science (Washington DC) 272:1339 -1342, 1996[Abstract]
  6. Hateboer N, v Dijk MA, Bogdanova N, Coto E, Saggar-Malkik AK, San Millan J, Torra R, Breuning M, Ravine D: Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2: European PKD1-PKD2 Study Group. Lancet 353:103 -107, 1999[Medline]
  7. Hateboer N, Lazarou LP, Williams AJ, Holmans P, Ravine D: Familial phenotype differences in PKD1. Kidney Int56 : 34-40,1999[Medline]
  8. Peral B, Ong ACM, San Millan JL, Gamble V, Rees L, Harris PC: A stable, nonsense mutation associated with a case of infantile onset polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1). Hum Mol Genet5 : 539-542,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Qian F, Watnick TJ, Onuchic LF, Germino GG: The molecular basis of focal cyst formation in human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type I. Cell 87:979 -987, 1996[Medline]
  10. Pei Y, Watnick T, Ne N, Wang K, Liang Y, Parfrey P, Germino G, St George-Hyslop P: Somatic PKD2 mutations in individual kidney and liver cysts support a "two-hit" model of cystogenesis in type 2 autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol10 : 1524-1529,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Woo DDL, Nguyen DKP, Khatibi N, Olsen P: Genetic identification of two major modifier loci of polycystic kidney disease progression in pcy mice. J Clin Invest100 : 1934-1940,1997[Medline]
  12. Upadhya P, Churchill G, Birkenmeier EH, Barker JA, Frankl WN: Genetic modifiers of polycystic kidney disease in intersubspecific KAT2J mutants. Genomics 58:129 -137, 1999[Medline]
  13. Geberth S, Stier E, Zeier M, Mayer G, Rambausek M, Ritz E: More adverse renal prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in families with primary hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol6 : 1643-1648,1995[Abstract]
  14. Baboolal K, Ravine D, Daniels J, Williams N, Holmans P, Coles GA, Williams JD: Association of the angiotensin I converting enzyme gene deletion polymorphism with early onset of ESRF in PKD1 adult polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int 52:607 -613, 1997[Medline]
  15. Sullivan LP, Wallace DP, Grantham JJ: Epithelial transport in polycystic kidney disease. Physiol Rev78 : 1165-1191,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Welsh MJ, Tsui LC, Boat TF, Beaudet AL: Cystic fibrosis. In: The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, edited by Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995, pp3799 -3876
  17. Schwiebert EM, Benos DJ, Egan ME, Stutts MJ, Guggino WB: CFTR is a conductance regulator as well as a chloride channel. Physiol Rev 79(1 Suppl):S145 -S166, 1999
  18. Crawford I, Maloney PC, Zeitlin PL, Guggino WB, Hyde SC, Turley H, Gatter KC, Harris A, Higgins CF: Immunocytochemical localization of the cystic fibrosis gene product CFTR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA88 : 9262-9266,1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Devuyst O, Burrow CR, Schwiebert AM, Guggino WB, Wilson PD: Developmental regulation of CFTR expression during human nephrogenesis. Am J Physiol 271:F723 -F735, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morales MM, Carroll TP, Morita T, Schwiebert EM, Devuyst O, Wilson PD, Lopes AG, Stanton BA, Dietz HC, Cutting GR, Guggino WB: Both the wild type and a functional isoform of CFTR are expressed in kidney. Am J Physiol 270:F1038 -F1048, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kiesewetter S, Macek M, Davis C, Curristin SM, Chu CS, Graham C, Shrimpton AE, Cashman SM, Tsui LC, Mickle J, Amos J, Highsmith WE, Shuber A, Witt DR, Crystal RG, Cutting GR: A mutation in CFTR produces different phenotypes depending on chromosomal background. Nat Genet 5: 274-278,1993[Medline]
  22. Chillón M, Casals T, Mercier B, Bassas L, Lissens W, Silber S, Romey MC, Ruiz-Romero J, Cerlingue C, Claustres M, Nunes V, Férec C, Estivill X: Mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens. N Engl J Med 332:1475 -1480, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Jarvi K, Zielenski J, Wilschanski M, Durie P, Buckspan M, Tullis E, Markiewicz D, Tsui LC: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and obstructive azoospermia. Lancet345 : 1578,1995[Medline]
  24. Saxen L: Ontogenesis of the vertebrate excretory system. In: Organogenesis of the Kidney, edited by Saxen L, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp1 -34
  25. Hanaoka K, Devuyst O, Schwiebert EM, Wilson PD, Guggino WBV: A role for CFTR in human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Physiol 270:C389 -C399, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Brill SR, Ross KE, Davidow CJ, Ye M, Grantham JJ, Caplan MJ: Immunolocalization of ion transport proteins in human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10206 -10211, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Davidow CJ, Maser RL, Rome LA, Calvet JP, Grantham JJ: The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mediates transepithelial fluid secretion by human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease epithelium in vitro. Kidney Int 50:208 -218, 1996[Medline]
  28. O'Sullivan DA, Torres VE, Gabow PA, Thibodeau SN, King BF, Bergstralh EJ: Cystic fibrosis and the phenotypic expression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis32 : 976-983,1998[Medline]
  29. Ravine D, Gibson RN, Walker RG, Sheffield LJ, Kincaid-Smith P, Danks DM: Evaluation of ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease 1. Lancet343 : 824-827,1994[Medline]
  30. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Res 16: 1215,1988[Free Full Text]
  31. Cuppens H, Marynen P, De Boeck C, Cassiman JJ: Detection of 98.5% of the mutations in 200 Belgian cystic fibrosis alleles by reverse dot-blot and sequencing of the complete coding region and exon/intron junctions of the CFTR gene. Genomics 18:693 -697, 1993[Medline]
  32. Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium: Population variation of common cystic fibrosis mutations. Hum Mutat4 : 167-177,1994[Medline]
  33. Chu CS, Trapnell BC, Murtagh JJ Jr, Moss J, Dalemans W, Jallat S, Mercenier A, Pavirani A, Lecocq JP, Cutting GR: Variable deletion of exon 9 coding sequences in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mRNA transcripts in normal bronchial epithelium. EMBO J 10: 1355-1363,1991[Medline]
  34. Eggerding FA, Iovannisci DM, Brinson E, Grossman P, Winn-Deen ES: Fluorescence-based oligonucleotide ligation assay for analysis of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations. Hum Mutat 5: 153-165,1995[Medline]
  35. Breuning MH, Snijdewint FGM, Brunner H, Verwest A, Ijdo JW, Saris JJ, Dauwerse JG, Blonden L, Keith T, Callen DF, Hyland VJ, Xiao GH, Scherer G, Higgs DR, Harris P, Bachner L, Reeders ST, Germino G, Pearson PL, van Ommen GJB: Map of 16 polymorphic loci on the short arm of chromosome 16 close to the polycystic kidney disease gene (PKD1). J Med Genet 27:603 -616, 1990[Medline]
  36. Peters DJM, Spruit L, Saris JJ, Ravine D, Sandkuijl LA, Fossdal R, Boersma J, van Eijk R, Norby S, Constantinou-Deltas CD, Pierides A, Brissenden JE, Frants RR, van Ommen G-JB, Breuning MH: Localization of a second gene for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease on chromosome 4. Nat Genet 5: 359-362,1993[Medline]
  37. Peral B, Ward CJ, San Millan JL, Thomas S, Stallings RL, Moreno F, Harris PC: Evidence of linkage disequilibrium in the Spanish polycystic kidney disease I population. Am J Hum Genet54 : 899-908,1994[Medline]
  38. Nawaratne S, Fabiny R, Brien JA, Zaleberg J, Cosolo W, Whan A, Morgan DJ: Accuracy of volume measurement using helical CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:481 -486, 1997[Medline]
  39. van der Ven K, Messer L, van der Ven H, Jeyendran RS, Ober C: Cystic fibrosis mutation screening in healthy men with reduced sperm quality. Hum Reprod 11:513 -517, 1996
  40. Cuppens H, Lin W, Jaspers M, Costes B, Teng H, Vankeerberghan A, Jorissen M, Droogmans G, Reynaert I, Goossens M, Nilius B, Cassiman JJ: Polyvariant mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator genes. J Clin Invest 101:487 -496, 1998[Medline]
  41. Zielenski J, Corey M, Rozmahel R, Markiewicz D, Aznarez I, Casals T, Larriba S, Mercier B, Cutting GR, Krebsova A, Macek M Jr, Langfelder-Schwind E, Marshall BC, DeCelie-Germana J, Claustres M, Palacio A, Bal J, Nowakowska A, Ferec C, Estivill X, Durie P, Tsui LC: Detection of a cystic fibrosis modifier locus for meconium ileus on human chromosome 19q13. Nat Genet 22:128 -129, 1999[Medline]
  42. Cheng SH, Gregory RJ, Marshall J, Paul S, Souza DW, White GA, O'Riordan CR, Smith AE: Defective intracellular transport and processing of CFTR is the molecular basis of most cystic fibrosis. Cell 63:827 -834, 1990[Medline]
  43. Engelhardt JF, Yankaskas JR, Ernst SA, Yang Y, Marino CR, Boucher RC, Cohn JA, Wilson JM: Submucosal glands are the predominant site of CFTR expression in the human bronchus. Nat Genet2 : 240-247,1992[Medline]
  44. Kartner N, Augustinas O, Jensen TJ, Naismith AL, Riordan JR: Mislocalization of DF508 CFTR in cystic fibrosis sweat gland. Nat Genet 1: 321-327,1992[Medline]
  45. Kälin N, Claaß A, Sommer M, Puchele E, Tümmler B: DF508 CFTR protein expression in tissues from patient with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Invest 103:1379 -1389, 1999[Medline]
  46. Stanton BA: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and renal function. Wien Klin Wochenschr109 : 457-464,1997[Medline]
  47. Chu CS, Trapnell BC, Curristin S, Cutting GR, Crystal RG: Genetic basis of variable exon 9 skipping in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mRNA. Nat Genet 3:151 -156, 1993[Medline]
  48. Sharer N, Schwarz M, Malone G, Howarth A, Painter J, Super M, Braganza J: Mutations of the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 339:645 -652, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication February 23, 2000. Accepted for publication May 2, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Rossetti and P. C. Harris
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Autosomal Dominant and Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 1374 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. Jouret, A. Bernard, C. Hermans, G. Dom, S. Terryn, T. Leal, P. Lebecque, J.-J. Cassiman, B. J. Scholte, H. R. de Jonge, et al.
Cystic Fibrosis Is Associated with a Defect in Apical Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis in Mouse and Human Kidney
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 707 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. S. Magenheimer, P. L. St. John, K. S. Isom, D. R. Abrahamson, R. C. De Lisle, D. P. Wallace, R. L. Maser, J. J. Grantham, and J. P. Calvet
Early Embryonic Renal Tubules of Wild-Type and Polycystic Kidney Disease Kidneys Respond to cAMP Stimulation with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/Na+,K+,2Cl- Co-Transporter-Dependent Cystic Dilation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3424 - 3437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
X. F. Wang, M. M. Reddy, and P. M. Quinton
Effects of a new cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator inhibitor on Cl- conductance in human sweat ducts
Exp Physiol, July 1, 2004; 89(4): 417 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Devuyst, A. Persu, and M.-T. Vo-Cong
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: modifier genes and endothelial dysfunction
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2211 - 2215.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
O. Devuyst and W. B. Guggino
Chloride channels in the kidney: lessons learned from knockout animals
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): F1176 - F1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. Persu, M. S. Stoenoiu, T. Messiaen, S. Davila, C. Robino, O. El-Khattabi, M. Mourad, S. Horie, O. Feron, J. -L. Balligand, et al.
Modifier effect of ENOS in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2002; 11(3): 229 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PERSU, A.
Right arrow Articles by VERELLEN-DUMOULIN, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed