Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHIMIZU, A.
Right arrow Articles by COLVIN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHIMIZU, A.
Right arrow Articles by COLVIN, R. B.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:2371-2380, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

Acceptance Reaction: Intragraft Events Associated with Tolerance to Renal Allografts in Miniature Swine

AKIRA SHIMIZU*, KAZUHIKO YAMADA{dagger}, SHANE M. MEEHAN{ddagger}, DAVID H. SACHS{dagger} and ROBERT B. COLVIN*

* Department of Pathology, Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Department of Transplantation, Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
§ Department of Pathology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence to Dr. Robert B. Colvin, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street (WRN 225), Boston, MA 02114; Phone: 617-726-2966; Fax: 617-726-7533; E-mail: colvin{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Inbred miniature swine that are treated for 12 d with a high dose of cyclosporin A develop tolerance to MHC class II matched, class I-mismatched renal allografts. The aim of this study was to clarify the intrarenal allograft events associated with the development of tolerance in this protocol. Morphologic and immunologic studies were performed in serial biopsies from accepting grafts after 12 d of cyclosporin A treatment (n = 4) and were compared with those from untreated control rejecting grafts (n = 4). In accepting grafts with stable function, a transient interstitial infiltrate developed. The cellular infiltrate had many similarities to that in rejecting grafts; both had T cells and macrophages, similar proportions of T-cell subsets, and a similar frequency of in situ nick end labeling (TUNEL)+ apoptotic infiltrating cells. However, the cellular infiltrate in the acceptance reaction was distinguished by less T-cell activation (interleukin-2 receptor+), less proliferation (proliferating cell nuclear antigen+) of infiltrating cells, and less graft cell apoptosis in arteries, tubules, glomeruli, and peritubular capillaries. Thereafter, the infiltrate in the accepting grafts progressively resolved with decreased cell proliferation, activation, and apoptotic graft parenchymal cell injury, but the high frequency of apoptosis persisted in graft-infiltrating cells. In parallel to the intragraft events, donor-specific unresponsiveness developed as assessed by cell-mediated cytotoxicity by blood mononuclear cells in vitro. In conclusion, the acceptance reaction in transplanted grafts is characterized by progressive resolution of T-cell proliferation and activation and of cell-mediated graft injury, as well as prolonged T-cell apoptosis. These intragraft events suggest that both T-cell anergy and T-cell deletion occur in the graft during the development of tolerance. Some of the described immunopathologic findings (activation, proliferation, apoptosis) may be useful in distinguishing acceptance from rejection, as well as in predicting later graft acceptance in tolerance induction protocols.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A major goal of organ transplantation has been to induce donor-specific tolerance in organ recipients, which has been demonstrated in a variety of animal studies (1,2,3). The mechanisms of tolerance are incompletely understood, including the events that may occur in the graft itself. Partially inbred miniature swine, homozygous for the MHC, provide a unique large animal preclinical model for experimental study, and we have demonstrated that tolerance to renal allotransplants across MHC class I differences can be achieved by short course high-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) (4,5). This animal model provides an ideal opportunity to study the morphologic features of intragraft events that precede long-term graft acceptance and has potential relevance to the subclinical allograft reactions observed in patients.

In acute renal allograft rejection in humans, infiltration of the interstitium with mononuclear cells, including cytotoxic T cells, is a characteristic feature (6,7,8,9), and the cells show marked activation and/or proliferation (10,11,12). However, cell infiltration is also detected in normally functioning grafts with no obvious clinical evidence of rejection (13,14,15). Graft-infiltrating cells are also seen in the induction of tolerance to allogeneic grafts in animal models (16,17,18,19). The distinguishing features of cell infiltrates in normal functioning or accepting grafts in the development of tolerance are unclear.

We therefore studied the intragraft morphologic features associated with induction and subsequent development of tolerance (which we have termed the "acceptance reaction"), focusing on the activation, proliferation, and apoptosis in graft-infiltrating cells and cell-mediated apoptotic graft injury. Serial monitoring was performed to assess whether (1) the phenotypic characteristics, (2) level of immune activation, (3) proliferation, and (4) extent of apoptosis in graft infiltrating cells or (5) level of apoptotic graft injury was useful in distinguishing graft acceptance from rejection as well as in predicting further development of transplantation tolerance.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and Surgery
The genetic characteristics of the MHC homozygous and intra-MHC recombinant miniature swine have been described previously (4,5,20). Recombinant SLAgg (class Ic/c, class IId/d) were used as kidney donors and SLAdd (class Id/d, class IId/d) animals were used as recipients of orthotopic kidney transplants, resulting in MHC class II matched, 2-haplotype class I mismatched organs, as described previously (4). Four experimental recipients were treated with a short course of CsA (10 to 13 mg/kg per d for 12 consecutive days), starting on the day of transplantation, to induce donor-specific tolerance across the class I barrier (4). A group of four control animals did not received CsA, and all rejected the grafts within 2 wk after transplantation. In the syngeneic control group (n = 1), syngeneic kidney was transplanted using the same procedures without CsA treatment. Plasma creatinine (Cr) level was examined as a measure of graft function.

Histologic Examination
Serial open kidney biopsies were taken on postoperative days 4, 7, 8, and 11 for all groups and on days 18, 30, 60, and 100 for the CsA-treated graft acceptance and syngeneic control groups. For light microscopic examination, tissue was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stains were performed for histologic examination. The biopsy samples were diagnosed using National Institutes of Health-Cooperative Clinical Trials in Transplantation classification of allograft rejection (21,22,23).

A standard of the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) technique (9) was used in frozen sections to detect phenotype of infiltrating cells. Primary antibodies included anti-pig monoclonal antibodies MSA4 (anti-swine CD2), BB23-8E6 (anti-swine CD3), 74-12-4 (anti-swine CD4), 76-2-11 (anti-swine CD8), BB6-11C9 (anti-swine CD21; B cells), K231-3B2 (anti-swine interleukin-2 receptor; IL2R), and 74-22-15A (macrophages) (24) and anti-human CD3 polyclonal antibodies (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). The anti-human CD3 antibody was confirmed to react with swine pan T cells using swine thymus, lymph nodes, and spleen.

For the detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), 10% buffered formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were used, and sections were stained using ABC technique. To optimize detection of PCNA, microwave treatment (heat for 2 x 5 min in 0.01 M sodium citrate [pH 6.0] in a 750-W microwave oven at full power and then immediately chilling to 4°C) and 1:1000 dilution of PC10 (DAKO), was used (25). Double immunostaining for PCNA and CD3 was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin sections using a two-color staining technique (9). The sections first were stained with PCNA and incubated with alkaline phosphatase-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA) with a blue reaction product (Alkaline Phosphatase Substrate Kit III, Vector). Sections then were stained with polyclonal CD3, horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-goat antibody (DAKO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) containing 3,3'-diaminobendizine (DAB; Research Genetics, Hansville, AL), which has a brown reaction product. Controls included substitution of the primary antibody with an irrelevant antibody and use of anti-CD3 before anti-PCNA. Sections of thymus and lymph node were used as positive controls to ensure that the staining procedures were effective.

In histologic sections, fragmented nuclear DNA associated with apoptosis was labeled by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) (26). The 2.5-µm thick sections were deparaffinized and incubated with proteinase K 100 µg/ml for 15 min. After blocking endogenous peroxidase by immersion in distilled water containing 2% H2O2, sections were rinsed in TdT buffer and incubated with TdT 1:25 and biotinylated-dUTP 1:20 in TdT buffer for 60 min at 37°C. The biotinylated nuclei were detected with avidin-peroxidase and H2O2 containing DAB. Double immunostaining with TUNEL and CD3 for the identification of the origin of TUNEL+ cells was performed by immunoalkaline phosphatase using TUNEL, followed by an antibody to CD3, horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-goat, then incubated with H2O2 containing DAB. Negative controls consisted of omission of dUTP or TdT. The positive control was swine thymus, which shows numerous TUNEL+ thymocytes.

Quantification of Histologic Findings
Morphometric studies were performed to determine the number of CD3-, CD4-, CD8-, or CD21-positive cells and macrophages per mm2, as well as the proportions of graft-infiltrating cells that were PCNA+, IL2R+, or TUNEL+. All counts and pathologic evaluation were performed on coded slides, without prior knowledge of the clinical or histologic diagnosis, at 400x, using an optical grid area of 0.0625 mm2. Counts were expressed as the numbers of positive cells per mm2 and as the percentage of the infiltrating mononuclear cells. In addition, the percentage of cortex with infiltrating cells was estimated in low-power fields (at 40x) in all fields of the renal cortex. To determine the degree of graft parenchymal cell injury, we counted the number of TUNEL+ glomerular cells per glomerular cross section, the number of TUNEL+ endothelial cells in peritubular capillaries per mm2, the percentage of TUNEL+ tubular epithelial cells, or the percentage of TUNEL+ arteries in CD3 and TUNEL double-stained sections and examined the correlation between CD3+ cells and TUNEL+ graft parenchymal cells. In this study, we identified the cell type of TUNEL+ cells by its location, morphologic appearance, and CD3 expression; those in which the cell type could not be determined were excluded (5% or less). More than 40 glomerular cross sections or more than 40 fields of renal cortex were counted in all biopsy specimens. These results were expressed as the mean ± SD or SEM, and statistical analysis was performed using the t test.

Cell-Mediated Lympholysis Assay
Cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) assays were performed using peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) as described previously (4). Briefly, lymphocyte cultures containing 4 x 106 responder and 4 x 106 irradiated (25 G) stimulator PBL in 2 ml of medium were incubated for 6 d at 37°C in 7.5% CO2 and 100% humidity. Bulk cultures were harvested, and effector cells were tested on 51Cr-labeled blasts. The tests were run at serially diluted ratios (100:1, 50:1, 25:1, 12.5:1). After 5.5 h of effector cell incubation with the 5 x 103 specific targets, supernatants were harvested and 51Cr release was determined on a gamma counter (Micromedics, Huntsville, AL). Maximum lysis was obtained with a 1% solution of the nonionic detergent NP-40 (BLR, Rockville, MD). Baseline levels were measured as the rate of spontaneous release of 51Cr from 5 x 103 targets. The data were expressed as percentage of specific lysis:

% specific lysis = {[experimental release (cpm) - spontaneous release (cpm)]/[maximum release (cpm) - spontaneous release (cpm)]} x 100

The results of the control (rejector) and the acceptor groups were expressed as the mean ± SD, and statistical analysis was performed using the t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Control SLAdd pigs that received SLAgg kidneys without immunosuppression rejected on days 9 to 11, and SLAdd pigs that were treated with a 12-d course of CsA all accepted SLAgg kidneys with a stable graft function for more than 100 d (Figure 1). SLAdd pigs that received syngeneic kidney transplant showed a stable graft function without CsA treatment. The morphologic and immunologic markers were examined in serial biopsies taken from grafts in the CsA tolerance-inducing protocol (n = 4) and compared with grafts in untreated control recipients (n = 4) or syngeneic control animal (n = 1).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Graft function (plasma creatinine [Cr] level) in the rejecting ({circ}, n = 4) and the accepting ([UNK], n = 4) grafts. In the control rejector group, plasma Cr levels increase at around day 6, and all kidneys develop irreversible rejection by day 11. In the acceptor group and syngenic group, stable Cr levels continue during the experimental periods.

 

Graft-Infiltrating Cells in Rejecting Grafts
In control rejecting recipients, a progressive mononuclear cell infiltrate with cellular proliferation and activation developed and led to irreversible rejection. By day 7, the mononuclear cell infiltrate extended diffusely in the interstitium and caused tubulitis, glomerulitis, and endotheliitis in arteries (Figure 2A). Infiltrating cells had large nuclei and nucleoli, indicating typical activated lymphocytes (Figure 2B). CD3+ T cells diffusely infiltrated the cortex (Figure 2C). The mononuclear cells infiltrated more than 60% of interstitium in the cortex on day 7 and were composed of a similar number of CD3+ cells (2500/mm2) and macrophages (2000/mm2) (Figure 3). CD8+ cells were the predominant T cells (1500/mm2), with lesser amounts of CD4+ cells (700/mm2). Occasional CD21+ B cells (90/mm2) were found. Many graft-infiltrating cells were PCNA+ (Figure 2D). In double staining with PCNA and CD3, many PCNA+ cells expressed CD3 (Figure 2E), indicating that T cells were proliferating in the grafts. IL2R+ infiltrating cells were present diffusely in the cortex (Figure 2F). TUNEL+ apoptotic cells and apoptotic bodies were found in the infiltrate (Figure 2G), and double stain with TUNEL and CD3 showed that infiltrating T cells underwent apoptosis in the grafts (Figure 2H).



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Cellular infiltrate in the rejecting graft on day 7. Control (rejecting) grafts show a progressive mononuclear cell infiltrate with extensive tubulitis, glomerulitis, and endotheliitis ({blacktriangledown}) (A). These infiltrating cells include numerous proliferating ({downarrow}) and activated lymphocytes (B), CD3+ T cells (C), PCNA+ proliferating cells ({downarrow}) (D), PCNA+ CD3+ proliferating T cells ({downarrow}) (E), IL2R+ activated cells ({downarrow}) (F), and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells ({downarrow}) (G). TUNEL+ infiltrating cells express CD3 ({downarrow}) (H), indicating that apoptotic infiltrating cells are of T-cell origin. Magnifications: x250 (periodic acid-Schiff [PAS] stain) in A; x1000 (PAS stain) in B; x200 (CD3 stain) in C; x600 (PCNA stain) in D; x800 (double stain with PCNA [black] and CD3 [brown] in E; x500 (IL2R stain) in F; x400 (TUNEL stain) in G; x800 (double stain with TUNEL [black] and CD3 [brown] in H.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. The percentage of cell infiltrate areas in the cortex (A) and the infiltrate cell phenotype (B through F) in the rejecting ({circ}, n = 4) and the accepting ([UNK], n = 4) grafts (values are expressed as mean ± SEM). In rejecting grafts, the cell infiltrate develops rapidly and peaks on day 7. In accepting grafts, the CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ cell and macrophage infiltrate peaks at days 8 to 18 and spontaneously remits. The peak number of all phenotypic subsets, excluding CD21+ B cells, in accepting grafts is significantly less than in rejecting grafts (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001), but the proportion of each subset is similar.

 

Graft-Infiltrating Cells in Accepted Grafts
In syngeneic control graft, only a few infiltrating cells and CD3+ cells were evident during the experimental periods. Despite stable renal function in animals that received CsA, a cellular infiltrate began on day 4 and reached a maximum on days 8 to 18 (Figure 3). However, the cell infiltrate spontaneously resolved by day 100. On days 8 to 18, the patchy mononuclear cell infiltrate with CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ cells was seen in perivascular areas; tubulitis and glomerulitis were less prominent and endotheliitis was absent (Figures 4, A and B, and 5). The peak concentration of CD3+ (1200/mm2), CD8+ (800/mm2), and CD4+ (300/mm2) cells and macrophages (1000/mm2) were significantly lower in acceptance reactions than in the rejecting grafts, but the proportion of each subset was similar in both groups (Figure 3). The number of CD21+ B cells, which peaked on day 30 (60/mm2), was not significantly different from rejecting grafts. Fewer PCNA+, PCNA+ CD3+, or IL2R+ graft infiltrating cells were seen in accepting grafts (Figures 5D and 6), and the peak % of PCNA+ and IL2R+ cells on day 8 (13.3 and 11.0%, respectively) was significantly lower than for the rejecting group (24.3 and 21.2%, respectively; P < 0.01; Figure 7). A similar fraction of the peak TUNEL+ graft-infiltrating cells was observed in both rejecting and accepting grafts (4.9 and 4.3%, respectively; Figures 7 and 8).



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Cellular infiltrate in the accepting graft on days 8 (A), 18 (B), 30 (C), and 60 (D). A transient mononuclear cell infiltrate develops by days 8 to 18 with less prominent tubulitis, glomerulitis, and no endotheliitis. Thereafter, cell infiltrate gradually resolves by day 100. Magnification, x250 (PAS stain).

 


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. CD3+, CD8+, CD4+, and IL2R+ cell infiltrates the accepting graft on day 8. Patchy CD3+ T cells are seen in perivascular areas (A). The serial sections show that the cell infiltrate contains numerous CD3+ (B) and CD8+ (C) cells with an activated phenotype (IL-2R) (E), and less prominent CD4+ cells (D). Magnifications: x200 (CD3 stain) in A; x500 in B (CD3 stain), C (CD8 stain), D (CD4 stain), and E (IL-2R stain).

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. PCNA+ proliferating cells in the accepting graft on days 8 (A and B) 18 (C), 30 (D), and 60 (E). (A) Infiltrating cells have PCNA+ nuclei ({downarrow}) on day 8, indicating proliferation in the grafts. (B) Proliferating cells express CD3 ({downarrow}), indicating that proliferating cells are T cell in origin. (C through E) Thereafter, proliferation of infiltrating cells resolve rapidly. Magnifications: x600 in A, C through E (PCNA stain); x800 in B (double stain with PCNA [black] and CD3 [brown]).

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. The percentage of PCNA+ (A), IL2R+ (B), and TUNEL+ (C) graft-infiltrating cells in the rejecting ({circ}, n = 4) and the accepting ([UNK], n = 4) grafts. The peak percentages of PCNA+ and IL2R+ graft-infiltrating cells are significantly less (**, P < 0.01) in the accepting grafts compared with the rejecting grafts. Thereafter, progressively diminishing cell proliferation and activation are observed in the accepting grafts. Similar peak levels of TUNEL+ graft-infiltrating cells are observed in both grafts, and apoptosis continues at nearly peak levels for up to 60 d in the accepting grafts. Values are expressed as mean ± SD in A and B and as mean ± SEM in C.

 


View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Apoptotic graft-infiltrating cells in the accepting graft on days 8 (A), 18 (B), 30 (C), and 60 (D). Numerous apoptotic graft-infiltrating cells ({downarrow}) are seen in the accepting grafts, and these continue during the development of tolerance (TUNEL stain, x400). Inset in D (double stain with TUNEL [black] and CD3 [brown]) shows apoptosis in infiltrating T cells ({downarrow}; x1000).

 

After reaching a peak on day 18, the mononuclear cell, T-cell, and macrophage infiltrate began to decrease by day 30 and further decreased by day 100 (Figures 3 and 4). The number of cells labeling for PCNA+ and IL2R+ decreased earlier (starting on day 11) and more rapidly than the infiltrate cell decrease (Figures 6 and 7). Apoptosis of graft-infiltrating cells continued at nearly peak levels for up to 60 d, then gradually decreased by day 100 (Figures 7 and 8). In double staining with TUNEL and CD3 (Figure 8D, inset), TUNEL+ cells expressed CD3, indicating that some of the infiltrating T cells undergo apoptosis in the grafts.

Cell-Mediated Apoptotic Graft Injury
In syngeneic graft, only a few CD3+ infiltrating cells and TUNEL+ apoptotic graft parenchymal cells were evident during experimental periods. In rejecting grafts by day 7, many CD3+ cells and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells were seen in the lesions in the arterial intima, glomeruli, tubules, and peritubular capillaries (Figure 9, A through D). Occasional TUNEL+ cells were adjacent to infiltrating CD3+ cells.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 9. The CD3+ cell infiltrate and apoptosis of graft parenchymal cells in tubulitis (A and E), acute glomerulitis (B and F), peritubular capillaries (C and G), and endotheliitis (D and H) in the rejecting graft on day 7 (A through D) and the accepting graft on day 18 (E through H). In the rejecting grafts, numerous TUNEL+ apoptotic cells and bodies ({downarrow}) are observed with many infiltrating CD3+ cells. In the accepting grafts, less prominent CD3+ cell infiltrate and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells are seen. Magnification, x900 (double stain with CD3 [brown] and TUNEL method [black]).

 

In accepting grafts, CD3+ cells were less prominent and fewer TUNEL+ apoptotic cells were found in tubular, glomerular, and peritubular capillary lesions at days 8 to 18; no TUNEL+ cells were identified in arterial endothelium (Figure 9, E through H). The peak number of TUNEL+ tubular epithelial cells (0.95%), glomerular cells (1.0 cells/glomerular cross section), and peritubular capillary endothelial cells (17 cells/mm2) in accepting graft was significantly less than in rejecting grafts (2.6%, 1.9 cells/glomerular cross section and 36 cells/mm2, respectively; P < 0.01; Figure 10). TUNEL+ cells in tubules, glomeruli, and peritubular capillaries diminished by day 60, and very few TUNEL+ cells remained in these sites at day 100.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 10. The frequency of apoptotic tubular cells (A), glomerular cells (B), and endothelial cells in peritubular capillaries (C) and arteries (D) in the rejecting ({circ}, n = 4) and the accepting ({downarrow}, n = 4) grafts. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. The peak apoptosis in intrinsic graft parenchymal cells in the accepting grafts is less than in the rejecting grafts (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). Thereafter, apoptosis in intrinsic graft parenchymal cells gradually reduces by day 100. No apoptosis is evident in arterial endothelium in the accepting grafts.

 

In antidonor and third-party type class I CML assays, rejectors without CsA treatment maintained strong cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses against donor type targets aftr kidney transplant (Figure 11). In contrast, acceptors developed specific unresponsiveness to the donor class I antigens by postoperative day 30, and this was maintained until day 100, although they had strong CTL responses against third-party type targets. Positive in vitro CTL reactivity correlated with TUNEL+ donor parenchymal cells in the grafts (Figures 10 and 11).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 11. Antidonor and third-party type class I cell-mediated lymphocytolysis. After kidney transplantation, rejectors ({square}, n = 4) and acceptors (, n = 4) have strong cytotoxic T-cell responses against third-party target type antigen. Rejectors ({circ}, n = 4) also maintain strong responses against donor type targets after kidney transplant. In contrast, acceptors ([UNK], n = 4) develop specific unresponsiveness to the donor class I antigens by day 30 and maintain thereafter. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, during tolerance development, a prominent interstitial infiltrate that resembled rejection developed in grafts with stable function. However, the process resolved spontaneously and was followed by long-term graft acceptance with transplantation tolerance. We therefore termed the response the "acceptance reaction" and sought features that would distinguish it from rejection. We found that minimal activation, proliferation, and cell-mediated target cell injury, as well as abundant apoptosis, are characteristic of acceptance reactions. Morphologically, these cell infiltrates caused minimal tubulitis and glomerulitis, and no endotheliitis. Moreover, we demonstrated that the development of tolerance is associated with progressively diminished infiltrating cell proliferation, activation, and cell-mediated graft cell injury, as well as persistence of infiltrating cell apoptosis. These results indicate the possibility that limiting the proliferation and activation of infiltrating T cells (T cell anergy) and loss of donor reactive T cells by apoptosis (T-cell deletion) are associated with the downregulation of alloimmune responses in tolerance.

T cells composed the largest leukocyte population in the rejecting and the accepting grafts. The proportions of CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ cells and macrophages were similar in all time points in accepting and rejecting grafts, confirming that T-cell subsets had neither prognostic nor diagnostic significance. In rejection in the present study, the interstitial mononuclear cells, CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ T cells, and macrophage infiltrate doubled in extent and intensity compared with the accepting grafts. Although the intensity or extent of the infiltrate has no or only negligible predictive value for graft prognosis in clinical renal transplantation under antirejection therapy, these may be important in distinguishing between acceptance and rejection reactions in tolerance induction protocols.

Recent reports demonstrated that the analysis of cell activation and proliferation of graft infiltrating cells could be useful in differentiating between rejection and other causes of graft dysfunction (10,11,12). In the present study, the peak percentage of PCNA+ and IL2R+ cells in the graft infiltrate were significantly less in accepting grafts compared with rejecting grafts, suggesting that these analyses are also useful in the diagnosis of acceptance reaction. Moreover, our results suggest that a limitation of T-cell proliferation and activation occurs at the time of first exposure to alloantigens in the induction of tolerance and supports the hypothesis that the development of tolerance depends on a relative deficit of T-cell help in the presence of alloantigens (5,27).

The development of tolerance in this model is thymic dependent and therefore involves central mechanisms (28). However, peripheral tolerance mechanisms may also be essential. During the first few weeks after transplant in this model, renal grafts showed the expression of relatively elevated levels of IL-10 in tolerant animals compared with those with rejection (19). The infiltrate contains immunoregulatory cells that are important in the adaptation of the host to the graft in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance (29). Several experimental models of tolerance have shown that Th2-derived cytokines are postulated to contribute to tolerance induction and allograft acceptance by promoting clonal anergy or deletion of alloreactive T lymphocytes (30,31). Thus, intragraft events may be a cause as well as an effect of the induction of tolerance.

It is notable that infiltrating T cells undergo apoptosis that continues at nearly peak levels for up to 60 d in the absence of any exogenous immunosuppressive drug therapy. The prolonged in situ apoptosis may be an important mechanism of containing or eliminating donor reactive cells. Recent studies of rat experimental models of allergic encephalomyelitis (32) and tubulointerstitial nephritis (33) showed that apoptosis is the mechanism that leads to elimination of infiltrating leukocytes during resolution of inflammation. Fas/Fas ligand (Fas-L)-triggered apoptosis may be crucial in this process, as suggested by the marked accumulation of activated lymphocytes in mice deficient in Fas(lpr/lpr) or Fas-L (gld) (34). It is postulated that high-level Fas-L expression on the graft organs promotes the induction of tolerance, probably as a result of the apoptotic deletion of graft-invading cells by Fas/Fas-L interaction (35). In addition, activation-induced T-cell death via Fas/Fas-L pathway, alloantigen-induced T-cell death, and absence of a costimulatory signal during primary activation-induced T-cell death may contribute to graft-infiltrating cell apoptosis (34,35,36). In mouse liver or combined liver/small bowel transplantation, apoptosis of CD8+ T cells is connected with the process of specific tolerance induction (37). In the present study, during the time that apoptosis of infiltrating cells occurred, donor reactive CTL in the PBL decreased. This led us to hypothesize that the effector CTL in grafts undergo apoptosis. Recently, evidence showed that apoptosis of infiltrating CTL in liver grafts occurs during the development of tolerance (38). Although the mechanism is unknown, it seems that in situ apoptosis may regulate the number of infiltrating cells and cell-mediated antigraft activity in the development of graft acceptance.

T-cell—mediated cytotoxicity probably plays an important role in acute allograft rejection by lysis and apoptosis of MHC-incompatible cells (34,39,40). In human renal allografts, apoptosis of graft parenchymal cells occurs during rejection (9,41,42). Our study demonstrated that although CD3+ cells infiltrated the tubules, glomeruli, and peritubular capillaries, only rare TUNEL+ apoptotic graft cells were seen in these sites in accepting grafts, arguing that the infiltrate in accepting grafts was less active in mediating target cell injury. Thereafter, there was a parallel loss of anti—donor-specific CTL reactivity in the PBL and loss of parenchymal cell apoptosis in the grafts, suggesting that a spontaneously remitting immune reaction to donor is important for tolerance to develop.

In this study, we demonstrated that a type of allograft reaction, which precedes long-term graft acceptance, has many similarities with the rejection reaction. However, graft-infiltrating cells in the acceptance reaction are characterized by minimal proliferation, minimal activation, and low frequency of cell-mediated graft cell injury and abundant T-cell apoptosis. The graft acceptance reaction is also characterized by progressively diminishing infiltrating cell proliferation and activation, resolving cell-mediated target cell injury, and persistent apoptosis of infiltrating cells. Analysis of proliferation, activation, and apoptosis in allografts may be useful to determine the status of the donor-reactive immune response and may have practical value in distinguishing the acceptance reaction from rejection. These intragraft events may be relevant in the study of protocol biopsies in humans, and the distinction of subclinical rejection from harmless infiltrate is therapeutically important.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health: 2RO1-AI 31046B08 and 2PO1-HL 01846-21A1 (to D.H.S.) and PO1-HL 18646 (to R.B.C.) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture in Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C-2-11671059) (to A.S.). The expert technical assistance of Patricia Della Pelle and Joseph Amborz is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sykes M: Chimerism and central tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol 8: 694-703,1996[Medline]
  2. Naji A: Induction of tolerance by intrathymic inoculation of alloantigen. Curr Opin Immunol 8:704 -709, 1996[Medline]
  3. Aradhye S, Turka LA: Will tolerance become a clinical reality?Am J Med Sci 313:310 -314, 1997[Medline]
  4. Rosengard BR, Ojikutu CA, Guzzetta PC, Smith CV, Sundt TM III, Nakajima K, Boorstein SM, Hill GS, Fishbein JM, Sachs DH: Induction of specific tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine with cyclosporin. Transplantation 54:490 -497, 1992[Medline]
  5. Gianello P, Fishbein JM, Sachs DH: Tolerance to primary vascularized allografts in miniature swine. Immnol Rev133 : 19-44,1993[Medline]
  6. Hall BM: Cells mediating allograft rejection.Transplantation 51:1141 -1151, 1991[Medline]
  7. Wecker H, Auchincloss H: Cellular mechanisms of rejection.Curr Opin Immunol 4:561 -566, 1992[Medline]
  8. Colvin RB: General features of the allograft response. In:Diagnostic Immunopathology , 2nd Ed., edited by Colvin RB, Bhan AK, McCluskey RT, New York, Raven, 1995, pp311 -328
  9. Meehan SM, McCluskey RT, Pascual M, Preffer FI, Anderson P, Schlossman ST, Colvin RB: Cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human renal allografts: Identification, distribution, and quantitation of cells with a cytotoxic granule protein GMP-17 (TIA-1) and cells with fragmented nuclear DNA. Lab Invest 76,639 -649, 1997[Medline]
  10. Serón D, Alexopoulos E, Raftery MJ, Hartley RB, Cameron JS: Diagnosis of rejection in renal allograft biopsies using the presence of activation and proliferating cells.Transplantation 47:811 -816, 1989[Medline]
  11. Salom RN, Maguire JA, Esmore D, Hancock WW: Analysis of proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression aids histological diagnosis and is predictive of progression of human cardiac allograft rejection. Am J Pathol 145: 876-882,1994[Abstract]
  12. Olsen S, Hansen HE: Proliferation rate of cells in the interstitial infiltrate in acute kidney allograft rejection. Transplant Proc28 : 502-503,1996[Medline]
  13. McWhinnie DL, Thompson JF, Taylor HM, Chapman JR, Bolton EM, Carter NP, Wood RFM, Morris PJ: Morphometric analysis of cellular infiltration assessed by monoclonal antibody labeling in sequential human renal allograft biopsies. Transplantation 42:352 -358, 1986[Medline]
  14. Solez K, Racusen LC, Marcussen N, Slatnik I, Keown P, Burdick JF, Olsen S: Morphology of ischemic acute renal failure, normal function, and cyclosporin toxicity in cyclosporin-treated renal allograft recipients.Kidney Int 43:1058 -1067, 1993[Medline]
  15. Rush DH, Henry SF, Jeffery JR, Schroeder T, Gough J: Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable renal allograft recipients.Transplantation 57:208 -211, 1994[Medline]
  16. Russell PS, Chase CM, Colvin RB, Plate JMD: Kidney transplants in mice: An analysis of the immune status of mice bearing long-term, H-2 incompatible transplants. J Exp Med 147:1449 -1468, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dahmen U, Qian S, Rao AS, Demetris AJ, Fu F, Sun H, Gao L, Fung JJ, Starzl TE: Split tolerance induced by orthotopic liver transplantation in mice. Transplantation 58:1 -8, 1994[Medline]
  18. Kawai T, Cosimi A, Colvin R, Powelson J, Eason J, Kozlowski T, Sykes M, Monroy R, Tanaka M, Sachs DH: Mixed allogenic chimerism and renal allograft tolerance in Cynomolgus monkeys. Transplantation59 : 256-262,1995[Medline]
  19. Blancho G, Gianello P, Lorf T, Germana S, Giangrande I, Mourad G, Colvin RB, Sachs DH, LeGuern C: Molecular and cellular events implicated in local tolerance to kidney allografts in miniature swine.Transplantation 63:26 -33, 1997[Medline]
  20. Sachs DH, Leight G, Cone J, Schwarz S, Stuart L, Rosenberg S: Transplantation in miniature swine. I. Fixation of the major histocompatibility complex. Transplantation22 : 559-567,1976[Medline]
  21. Colvin RB: The renal allograft biopsy. Kidney Int50 : 1069-1082,1996[Medline]
  22. Colvin RB, Cohen AH, Saiontz C, Bonsib S, Buick M, Burke B, Carter S, Cavallo T, Haas M, Lindblad A, Manivel CJ, Nast CC, Salomon D, Weaver C, Weiss M: Evaluation of pathological criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: Reproducibility, sensitivity and clinical correlation. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:1930 -1941, 1997[Abstract]
  23. Nickeleit V, Vamvakas EC, Pascual M, Poletti BJ, Colvin RB: The prognostic significance of specific arterial lesions in acute renal allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1301 -1308, 1998[Abstract]
  24. Saalmüller A: Characterization of swine leukocyte differentiation antigens. Immunol Today17 : 352-354,1996[Medline]
  25. Lan HY, Mu W, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Atkins RC: A novel, simple, reliable and sensitive method of multiple immuno-enzymic staining: Use of microwave oven heating to block antibody cross-reactivity and retrieve antigens. J Histochem Cytochem 43:97 -102, 1995[Abstract]
  26. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA: Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation.J Cell Biol 119:493 -501, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dallman MJ, Shiho O, Page TH, Wood KJ, Morris PJ: Peripheral tolerance to alloantigen results from altered regulation of the interleukin 2 pathway. J Exp Med 172:79 -87, 1991
  28. Yamada K, Gianello PR, Ierino FL, Lorf T, Shimizu A, Meehna SM, Colvin RB, Sachs DH: Role of the thymus in transplantation tolerance in miniature swine. I. Requirement of the thymus for rapid and stable induction of tolerance to class I-mismatched renal allografts. J Exp Med1886 : 497-506,1997
  29. Ierino FL, Yamada K, Hatch T, Sachs DH: Preliminary in vitro evidence for regulatory cells in a miniature swine renal allograft model.Transplant Proc 29:1165 , 1997[Medline]
  30. Strom TB, Roy-Chaudhury P, Manfro R, Zheng XX, Nickerson PW, Wood K, Bushell A: The Th1/Th2 paradigm and the allograft response. Curr Opin Immunol 8:688 -693, 1996[Medline]
  31. Picotti JR, Chan SY, VanBuskirk AM, Eichwald EJ, Bishop DK: Are Th2 helper T lymphocytes beneficial, deleterious, or irrelevant in promoting allograft survival? Transplantation 63:619 -624, 1997[Medline]
  32. Schmied M, Breitschopf H, Gold R, Zichler H, Rothe G, Wekerle H, Lassmann H: Apoptosis of T lymphocytes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am J Pathol 143:446 -452, 1993[Abstract]
  33. Hewitson TD, Smith KGC, Becker GJ: Apoptosis and resolution of experimental renal infective tubulointerstitial nephritis.Nephrology 2:127 -132, 1996
  34. Nagata S, Golstein P: The Fas death factor. Science267 : 1149-1456,1995
  35. Kabelitz D: Apoptosis, graft rejection, and transplantation tolerance. Transplantation 65:869 -875, 1998[Medline]
  36. June CH, Bluestone JA, Nadler LM, Thompson CB: The B7 and CD28 receptor families. Immunol Today 15:321 -331, 1994[Medline]
  37. Meyer D, Baumgardt S, Loeffeler S, Czub S, Otto C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Ulrichs K: Apoptosis of T lymphocytes in liver and/or small bowel allografts during tolerance induction.Transplantation 66:1530 -1536, 1998[Medline]
  38. Qian S, Lu L, Li Y, Fu F, Li W, Starzl TE, Thomson AW, Fung JJ: Apoptosis of graft-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells: A mechanism underlying "split tolerance" in mouse liver transplantation.Transplant Proc 29:1168 -1169, 1997[Medline]
  39. Doherty PC: Cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Cell75 : 607-612,1993[Medline]
  40. Berke G: Unlocking the secrets of CTL and NK cells. Immunol Today 16: 343-346,1995[Medline]
  41. Ito H, Kasagi N, Shomori K, Osaki M, Adachi H: Apoptosis in the human allografted kidney. Transplantation60 : 794-798,1995[Medline]
  42. Sharma VK, Bologa RM, Li B, Xu GP, Lagman M, Hiscock W, Mouradian J, Wang J, Serur D, Rao VK, Suthanthiran M: Molecular executors of cell death-Differential intrarenal expression of Fas ligand, Fas, granzyme B, and perforin during acute and/or chronic rejection of human renal allografts.Transplantation 62:1860 -1866, 1996[Medline]
Received for publication December 27, 1999. Accepted for publication May 18, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-F. Cailhier, I. Sirois, P. Laplante, S. Lepage, M.-A. Raymond, N. Brassard, A. Prat, R. V. Iozzo, A. V. Pshezhetsky, and M.-J. Hebert
Caspase-3 Activation Triggers Extracellular Cathepsin L Release and Endorepellin Proteolysis
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27220 - 27229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. Harmon, K. Meyers, J. Ingelfinger, R. McDonald, M. McIntosh, M. Ho, L. Spaneas, J. A. Palmer, M. Hawk, C. Geehan, et al.
Safety and Efficacy of a Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance Regimen in Pediatric Renal Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1735 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Shishido, H. Asanuma, H. Nakai, Y. Mori, H. Satoh, I. Kamimaki, H. Hataya, M. Ikeda, M. Honda, and A. Hasegawa
The Impact of Repeated Subclinical Acute Rejection on the Progression of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 1046 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHIMIZU, A.
Right arrow Articles by COLVIN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHIMIZU, A.
Right arrow Articles by COLVIN, R. B.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP