Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SOMA, J.
Right arrow Articles by ITO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SOMA, J.
Right arrow Articles by ITO, S.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:690-699, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

High Prevalence and Adverse Effect of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Type II Diabetic-Related Nephropathy

JUN SOMA*, TAKAO SAITO*, YOSHIO TAGUMA{dagger}, SHIGEMI CHIBA{dagger}, HIROSHI SATO*, KAZUHIKO SUGIMURA*, SUSUMU OGAWA* and SADAYOSHI ITO*

* The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
{dagger} Department of Nephrology, Sendai Shakaihoken Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

Correspondence to Dr. Jun Soma, The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. Phone: +81 22 717 7163; Fax: +81 22 717 7168; E-mail: sjun2i{at}mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Over a 4-yr period in the northeast region of Japan (Tohoku), 3643 patients for whom a renal biopsy was available were screened. In addition, 2370 biopsied patients for whom hepatitis C virus (HCV) serology was available were evaluated. The prevalence of HCV infection was investigated in the 2370 biopsied patients. The highest prevalence of HCV infection was found in type II diabetic-related glomerulosclerosis (II-DGS) (24 of 123; 19.5%). At renal biopsy, clinical and laboratory findings and histologic parameters were comparable between the HCV-positive and -negative II-DGS groups. After renal biopsy, the decline of renal function reflected by the slope of reciprocal serum creatinine (1/SCr) was significantly greater in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group (P = 0.001). The log-rank test performed on the renal survival curves showed a significant difference in the two groups (P = 0.019). According to a multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for the effect of age, gender, BP, HbA1c, urinary protein excretion, and histologic parameters as covariates, urinary protein excretion (P = 0.011), severe arteriolar hyalinosis (P = 0.006), and HCV infection (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with 1/SCr slope. Finally, HCV infection was randomly examined in 545 outpatients and inpatients with type II diabetes mellitus who did not undergo renal biopsy. Of these, 56 patients were positive for HCV antibody (10.3%), and their proteinuria was heavier than in 489 HCV-negative patients (P = 0.001). This study reveals that HCV infection is present at a high rate in type II diabetic-related nephropathy and may have an adverse effect on the progression of the disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Throughout the world, including Japan, the number of patients requiring hemodialysis for diabetic nephropathy has increased enormously, becoming a serious management problem (1,2). Although several factors, such as poor glucose control (3), increased BP (4), proteinuria (5), lipid abnormalities (6), and genetic problems (7,8), can be identified contributing to the progression of diabetic nephropathy, it is highly suspected that there may be other prognostic factors for the deterioration of this disease.

In Japan, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody among blood donors is about 0.6% in the general population, but it increases with age, reaching 1 to 2% in the fifth and sixth decades of life (9). Interestingly, a high prevalence of HCV infection was recently reported in diabetic patients (10,11). In our experience, patients positive for HCV antibody with diabetic glomerulosclerosis may rapidly progress to end-stage renal failure and need hemodialysis. To date, however, there has been no study of the significance of HCV infection in diabetic nephropathy. We speculated that HCV infection may have an adverse effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Recently, the decline in renal function of patients with cryoglobulinemic or membranous glomerulonephritis has been reported to be faster among patients with HCV infection compared to those without HCV infection (12,13). In the present study, therefore, we retrospectively investigated whether HCV infection affects the prognosis of diabetic nephropathy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
From January 1994 to February 1998, 3643 patients with various renal diseases underwent renal biopsy in Tohoku University Hospital and 27 associated hospitals, and all histologic examination procedures and all histologic diagnoses were done in our renal unit. Diabetic patients underwent renal biopsy when primary renal diseases needed to be investigated because they showed microhematuria, heavy proteinuria without diabetic retinopathy, or a short diabetic history from the diagnosis. Before the biopsy, each patient gave informed consent. In 2370 patients of this group, HCV antibody was examined by the second or third generation assay for the screening of infectious diseases before renal biopsy. Type II diabetes mellitus was defined as a condition in which patients do not depend on insulin for immediate survival and rarely develop ketoacidosis, except under conditions of great physical stress (14), and type II diabetic-related glomerulosclerosis (II-DGS) was diagnosed by light microscopic examination according to the second edition of Renal Disease: Classification and Atlas of Glomerular Diseases, published in collaboration with the World Health Organization (15). The degree of sclerosis in each glomerulus by periodic acid-Schiff stain was graded semiquantitatively from 0 to 4 according to the classification of Gellman et al. (16). An index of II-DGS was calculated using the following formula in individual biopsy specimens:

where N is the number of glomeruli in each grade of sclerosis. Thus, II-DGS was classified among our patients into three stages: mild (II-DGS index <= 2.0), moderate (2.0 < II-DGS index <= 3.0), and advanced (3.0 < II-DGS index <= 4.0) (17). The degree of periodic acid-Schiff-positive arteriolar hyalinosis was semiquantitatively graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe.

First, we investigated the prevalence of HCV infection in each renal disease among the 2370 patients. Some cases in which II-DGS and primary renal diseases coexisted were classified into the II-DGS group. The patients diagnosed as II-DGS were divided into two groups based on whether they had HCV antibody (HCV-positive group) or not (HCV-negative group). Then, clinical parameters at renal biopsy such as age, gender, serum creatinine, urinary protein excretion, hematuria, HbA1c, BP, the percentages of insulin-treated patients and those with diabetic retinopathy, duration of diabetes, liver function, and antihypertensive drugs, as well as the histologic parameters mentioned above, were compared between the two groups. Cirrhosis was diagnosed when we morphologically confirmed findings characteristic of cirrhosis on computed tomographic scanning or ultrasonography in patients who showed findings such as spider angiomata, palmar erythema, a firm and nontender liver, abnormal collateral veins on the abdomen, a decrease in cholinesterase, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, elevations of thymol and zinc sulfate turbidity, and abnormalities of coagulation test. Hematuria was defined as red blood cells >4/high-powered field in urinary sediments. Duration of diabetes indicated a period between the initial diagnosis of diabetes and biopsy. HCV RNA in the serum was examined by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with primers derived from the 5' noncoding highly conserved region of the HCV genome (18) or branched DNA probe assay, which has been developed by Chiron Corp. (Emeryville, CA) (19). At the same time, follow-up study after renal biopsy was done in both groups. The decline in renal function was evaluated for each patient on the basis of the slope in reciprocal serum creatinine (1/SCr) over time (20,21). The need for hemodialysis or death from nonrenal disease during conservatively managed renal failure was considered the end point. Antihypertensive drugs at the final follow-up were also examined. The final data of follow-up study were obtained in January 1999. Additionally, apart from these biopsied patients, we randomly examined HCV antibody in outpatients and inpatients who had type II diabetes mellitus and were not under hemodialysis in our hospital (n = 545). Then clinical and laboratory findings were compared between HCV-positive and -negative patients, as in the study of biopsied patients, except urinary protein, which was examined by a urine dipstick.

Previous blood transfusions, previous surgical procedures, and the presence of a tattoo were examined in both biopsied and nonbiopsied patients as risk factors for HCV infection.

Statistical Analyses
All values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test, {chi}2 test, or Mann-Whitney U test, where appropriate. The renal survival was calculated for HCV-positive and -negative II-DGS groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the log-rank test was used to assess the difference in the survival curves. We also used a multiple linear regression analysis with SAS REG procedure (22), where we treated 1/SCr slope as a dependent variable. Age, gender, BP, urinary protein excretion, HbA1c, the presence of HCV antibody, index of II-DGS, and the degree of arteriolar hyalinosis were defined as independent variables. We converted four parameters into dummy variables: for gender being female as 0, male as 1; for HCV antibody being negative as 0, positive as 1; for index of II-DGS being mild and moderate as 0, advanced as 1; and for arteriolar hyalinosis being absent, mild, and moderate as 0, and severe as 1. The other parameters were used as continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Prevalence of HCV Infection in Various Renal Diseases
A total of 2370 patients with various renal diseases underwent renal biopsy and were examined for HCV antibody (Table 1). Ninety-seven patients, ages 22 to 90 (58.6 ± 12.7), were positive for HCV antibody (97 of 2370; 4.1%). The highest prevalence was found in II-DGS (24 of 123; 19.5%). There was one case with type I diabetic-related glomerulosclerosis, but HCV antibody was negative in the case. HCV antibody was also found in various renal diseases, including membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) in which the prevalence was 18.2% (10 of 55). Fifty patients who had other renal diseases, such as amyloidosis, periarteritis nodosa, hereditary renal diseases, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis, were negative for HCV antibody.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Prevalence of HCV infection in various renal diseasesa
 

II-DGS in Patients Who Were Not Tested for HCV Antibody
In 1273 biopsied patients who were not tested for HCV antibody, 39 had II-DGS. The prevalence of II-DGS was significantly higher (P = 0.003) in HCV-tested patients (123 of 2370; 5.2%) than in non-tested patients (39 of 1273; 3.1%). The mean age was significantly higher in 2370 HCV-tested patients than in 1273 non-tested patients (43.4 ± 18.7 versus 34.2 ± 21.9 yr; P < 0.0001), and the number of patients younger than 18 yr old was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in HCV-tested patients (289 of 2370; 12.2%) than in non-tested patients (475 of 1273; 37.3%).

Clinical and Laboratory Findings of Patients with II-DGS at Renal Biopsy
At renal biopsy, age, BP, serum creatinine, HbA1c, urinary protein excretion, the percentages of insulin-treated patients and those with diabetic retinopathy, and duration of diabetes were comparable between the HCV-positive and -negative groups (Table 2). The number of patients who showed hematuria tended to be larger in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group, but the difference was not significant (11 of 24 versus 27 of 99; P = 0.078). The male-to-female ratio in the HCV-positive group was significantly greater than that in the HCV-negative group (M/F: 22/2 versus 61/39, respectively; P = 0.004). Both aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase concentrations were significantly higher in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group (P < 0.0001), and the cholinesterase concentration was significantly lower in the former group than in the latter (P < 0.0001). Four patients had cirrhosis in the HCV-positive group, but none had the disease in the HCV-negative group. HCV RNA in the serum was examined in 12 patients by branched DNA probe assay and in four by RT-PCR. In all, 12 patients had detectable HCV RNA in the serum (12 of 16; 75%): nine of 12 by branched DNA probe assay and three of four by RT-PCR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Clinical and laboratory findings of patients with II-DGS at renal biopsya
 

As risk factors for HCV infection, previous blood transfusions were recognized in eight male and two female patients (10 of 24; 41.7%), previous surgical procedures in 15 male patients (15 of 24; 62.5%), and a tattoo in one male patient (1 of 24; 4.2%) who had no history of transfusion or surgical procedure.

Antihypertensive Drugs in Patients with II-DGS
Table 3 shows the number of patients who took each antihypertensive drug. At the time of renal biopsy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) were more frequently used in the HCV-positive group (20 of 24; 83.3%) than in the HCV-negative group (55 of 99; 55.6%), and the difference was significant (P = 0.012). However, calcium antagonists (CaA) and other antihypertensive drugs such as adrenergic inhibitors and diuretics were equally used in both groups. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIA) were not used in any case. There were 0 and 7 patients who took no antihypertensive drugs in the HCV-positive and -negative groups, respectively, but the difference was not significant. At the final follow-up, ACEI, CaA, and other drugs were used equally in both groups. AIIA was used in one case of the HCV-positive group and in three of the HCV-negative group, but the difference was not significant. There also was no difference in the percentage of patients who took no antihypertensive drugs between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Antihypertensive drugs in patients with II-DGSa
 

Histologic Findings of Patients with II-DGS
Histologically, the index of II-DGS and the degree of arteriolar hyalinosis were comparable between the two groups (Table 4). In 24 HCV-positive II-DGS patients, MPGN was also present in three patients (Figure 1), IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in two, and membranous nephropathy (MN) in one. In 99 HCV-negative II-DGS patients, IgAN was present in six patients and MN in three. Primary renal diseases were identified in more patients of the HCV-positive group (6 of 24; 25.0%) than in the HCV-negative group (9 of 99; 9.1%), and this difference was significant (P = 0.033).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Histologic findings of patients with II-DGSa
 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Renal histologic findings of a 48-yr-old woman who was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. (a) The glomerulus shows an increase of mesangial matrix and aneurysmal dilation of capillaries with exudative or hyaline lesions. The capillary walls are thickened and show double contours. Periodic acid-silver methenamine stain. (b) Immunofluorescence microscopy of IgM. IgM deposits strongly along capillary walls in a peripheral lobular pattern. IgG, C1q, and C3 were also observed in a similar pattern. (c) Electron microscopy shows subendothelial electron-dense deposits (D) and mesangial interposition (MI). The mesangial matrix (MM) is increased and the capillary basement membrane (BM) is thickened. Magnification: x200 in a and x180 in b.

 

Follow-Up Study of Patients with II-DGS
The follow-up period after renal biopsy was 4 to 59 mo (23.7 ± 14.2) in the HCV-positive group and 5 to 58 mo (28.7 ± 12.9) in the HCV-negative group (Table 5). This difference was not significant. During conservatively managed renal failure, three patients of the HCV-positive group and five patients of the HCV-negative group died from nonrenal diseases such as acute myocardial infarction, lung cancer, pneumonia, and sepsis. Hemodialysis was newly introduced in more of the HCV-positive group (8 of 24; 33.3%) than in the HCV-negative group (18 of 99; 18.2%), but this difference was not significant (P = 0.103). However, patients in the HCV-positive group showed a faster deterioration in renal function measured by 1/SCr compared with those in the HCV-negative group (-0.30 ± 0.27 dl/mg per yr versus -0.14 ± 0.19 dl/mg per yr, respectively; P = 0.001). When we did a follow-up study excluding the patients with MPGN, MN, or cirrhosis in both groups, the decline in renal function reflected by 1/SCr was also significantly greater in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group (-0.22 ± 0.15 dl/mg per yr versus -0.14 ± 0.19 dl/mg per yr; P = 0.048; data not shown) (Table 5). Figure 2 shows Kaplan-Meier renal survival curves excluding the patients who died from nonrenal disease during conservatively managed renal failure. The log-rank test performed on the survival curves showed that the difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.019). When the patients who died from nonrenal disease during conservatively managed renal failure were censored as of date of death, the log-rank test on renal survival curves also showed significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.035; data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Follow-up study of patients with II-DGSa
 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. The renal survival curves of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetic glomerulosclerosis who had HCV antibody (HCV-positive group) or not (HCV-negative group). The log-rank test showed that renal survival was significantly different between HCV-positive and -negative groups (P = 0.019).

 

Association between HCV Infection and Decline of Renal Function of II-DGS
The above bivariate association between HCV infection and 1/SCr slope was further examined by a multivariate analysis. Table 6 shows a multiple regression of the decline in renal function of II-DGS on HCV infection and other variables, as indicated by a multiple linear regression analysis. Urinary protein excretion, severe arteriolar hyalinosis, and HCV infection were significantly associated with the decline in renal function indicated by 1/SCr. The result shows that 1/SCr slope in HCV-positive II-DGS patients was steeper excessively by 0.1828 dl/mg per yr compared with that in HCV-negative II-DGS patients (95% confidence interval: 0.0869, 0.2787; P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Multiple regression of reciprocal serum creatinine (1/SCr) on HCV infection and other covariates in II-DGS patients (n = 123)a
 

HCV Infection in Nonbiopsied Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus
When 545 nonbiopsied patients with type II diabetes mellitus were randomly examined for HCV antibody (Table 7), 56 patients were found to be positive for HCV antibody (56 of 545; 10.3%). The mean age was higher in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients (63.3 ± 10.4 versus 59.6 ± 12.2 yr; P = 0.013). There were no statistical differences between HCV-positive and -negative patients in the male-to-female ratio, BP, HbA1c, the percentage of insulin-treated patients, and duration of diabetes. Fundus examination was done in 53 of 56 HCV-positive patients and in 449 of 489 HCV-negative patients. The percentage of patients with diabetic retinopathy was comparable in the two groups. The mean of serum creatinine was 0.97 ± 0.76 mg/dl in HCV-positive patients and 0.85 ± 0.71 mg/dl in HCV-negative patients, but this difference was not significant (P = 0.263). Both aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase concentrations were significantly higher in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). The cholinesterase concentration was significantly lower in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients (P < 0.0001). Cirrhosis was recognized in 13 cases of HCV-positive patients (13 of 56; 23.2%) and in five of the HCV-negative patients (5 of 489; 1.0%), and the difference was significant (P < 0.0001). Regarding cirrhosis of the five HCV-negative patients, the cause was hepatitis B in two patients, alcoholism in one, and unknown in two. HCV RNA in the serum was examined in four patients by branched DNA probe assay and in seven by RT-PCR. Of them, five patients had detectable HCV RNA (5 of 11; 45.5%): one of four by branched DNA probe assay and four of seven by RT-PCR. Proteinuria as examined by a urine dipstick was greater in 56 HCV-positive patients than in 497 HCV-negative patients. In 56 HCV-positive patients: - or ±, 28; 1+, 11; 2+, 9; and 3+, 8; and in 489 HCV-negative patients: - or ±, 346; 1+, 59; 2+, 51; and 3+, 33 (HCV-positive versus HCV-negative; P = 0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test). ACEI, CaA, and other antihypertensive drugs were used equally in both groups. AIIA were not used in any case. The percentage of patients who took no antihypertensive drugs was comparable between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7. Clinical and laboratory findings of patients with type II diabetes mellitus who did not undergo renal biopsya
 

As risk factors for HCV infection, previous blood transfusions were recognized in 24 patients (24 of 56; 42.4%) and previous surgical procedures in 35 (35 of 56; 62.5%). A tattoo was not recognized in any case.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We found that a high prevalence of HCV infection was present in both biopsied (19.5%) and nonbiopsied patients (10.3%) with diabetes mellitus, compared with that of blood donors in Japan, which is about 0.6% in the general population and 1 to 2% in those 50 to 60 yr old (9). Moreover, the present study showed that the decline in renal function was faster in patients with HCV-positive II-DGS than in those with HCV-negative II-DGS. Although ACEI were more frequently used in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group at the time of biopsy, both BP and urinary protein excretion were compatible between the two groups. Considering that ACEI protect against deterioration in renal function of diabetic nephropathy (23,24), the result emphasizes the rapid progression of HCV-positive II-DGS. Recent studies showing that cryoglobulinemic or membranous glomerulonephritis carries a worse prognosis in HCV-positive patients (12,13) are consistent with our results. This study also showed that, independently of HCV infection, the degree of proteinuria was a significant clinical factor and severe arteriolar hyalinosis was a significant histologic factor, both of which were associated with the decline in renal function of II-DGS.

Although HCV infection is well known to have an association with MPGN and MN (25,26,27), there has been no study of the prevalence of HCV infection in II-DGS. Accordingly, it is very important that the current study shows the highest prevalence in II-DGS but not in MPGN or MN. This evidence was clarified by the large amount of biopsies from patients with diabetes mellitus and the examination of HCV antibody in many of them for the screening of infectious diseases before renal biopsy. The question in the present study may be whether our study contains a nephrologic selection bias in the indication of renal biopsy. Actually, the prevalence of II-DGS was significantly higher (P = 0.003) in HCV-tested patients (123 of 2370; 5.2%) than in non-tested patients (39 of 1273; 3.1%). However, the mean age of non-tested patients was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than that of tested patients, and the percentage of patients younger than 18 yr old was significantly larger in non-tested patients than in tested patients (475 of 1273 = 37.3% versus 289 of 2370 = 12.2%; P < 0.0001). Because the prevalence of HCV antibody in schoolchildren in Japan is reported to be 0% (9), HCV antibody is seldom tested in them. In addition, a high prevalence of HCV infection was also identified in nonbiopsied diabetic patients (56 of 545; 10.3%) who were not under hemodialysis. The result is consistent with recent studies from Spain (18 of 176; 11.5%) (10) and Turkey (8 of 100; 8%) (11). These facts and results mitigate the possibility that our study may contain a nephrologic selection bias in the indication for renal biopsy.

Another important aspect of this study is that the degree of proteinuria was greater in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients. Serum creatinine levels tended to be higher in HCV-positive patients (0.97 ± 0.76 mg/dl) than in HCV-negative patients (0.85 ± 0.71 mg/dl), although the difference was not significant. These results and the association of the degree of proteinuria with the deterioration of renal function (Table 6) emphasize that HCV infection may influence the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

The reason for a high prevalence of HCV infection in diabetic patients is uncertain. Although approximately one-half of the patients had a history of blood transfusions and more than half had a history of surgical procedures, this does not necessarily prove the cause of HCV infection directly. In addition, it would be necessary to investigate the history of intravenous drug addiction. However, we could not investigate it since intravenous drug use is a serious crime in Japan. After all, the cause of HCV infection has been reported to be uncertain in half of Japanese patients with HCV antibody (28). Diabetic patients may be at risk of acquiring HCV infection. However, both Simó et al. (10) and Özyilkan et al. (11) provided some arguments suggesting that this might not be the case, since they did not find differences between HCV-positive and -negative diabetic patients in terms of hospital admissions, previous surgical procedures, mode of treatment, intravenous drug addiction, and previous blood transfusion. Recently, Allison et al. reported a significantly increased rate of diabetes in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, compared with other causes (29), and hepatitis C has been recognized as a multifaceted disease (30). Therefore, it is possible that HCV infection may play an etiopathologenic role in diabetes, just as HCV infection has been associated etiologically with glomerulonephritis (25,26,27), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (31), polyarthritis (32), and sicca syndrome (33).

Although we could not comprehensively explain why the renal function of HCV-positive patients with II-DGS rapidly deteriorated, we have some interesting theories. Immune complex glomerulonephritis has been reported to occur at a higher frequency in patients with diabetic nephropathy than in the nondiabetic population (34,35,36). In the current study, coexistence of primary renal diseases with II-DGS was found more frequently in HCV-positive patients (6 of 24; 25.0%) than in HCV-negative patients (9 of 99; 9.1%). Three MPGN cases and one MN case were found in the HCV-positive group, in contrast to the HCV-negative group in which six cases were IgAN and no case was MPGN. Judging from our results and past studies showing a close relationship between HCV infection in MPGN and MN (25,26,27), it is suspected that the associated MPGN and MN in II-DGS may be related to HCV infection. We must bear in mind that associated immunemediated glomerulonephritis in patients with diabetic nephropathy usually displays a rapid progression to renal failure (35,36). In the present study, 1/SCr slopes of one MPGN and one MN patient were great—-0.76 dl/mg per yr and -0.87 dl/mg per yr, respectively—and a patient with MPGN was introduced to hemodialysis only 14 mo after renal biopsy even though the initial serum creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl. Another problem is that four patients with HCV-positive II-DGS had cirrhosis. It is well known that HCV infection causes frequently cirrhosis (37). In cirrhosis, an intense intrarenal vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion contribute to the rapid deterioration of renal function (38). Actually, hemodialysis was introduced in three of the four patients with cirrhosis, in whom 1/SCr slope was -0.63, -0.76, and -0.27 dl/mg per yr, respectively. Thinking of these possible mechanisms of rapid progression of HCV-positive II-DGS, interferon may be indicated to suppress the rapid progression of diabetic nephropathy in some cases with associated immune complex glomerulonephritis, e.g., MPGN/MN, and chronic hepatitis C, since interferon has been reported to be effective in chronic hepatitis C and HCV-associated glomerulonephritis (25,39). Recently, it has been established that the association of interferon plus ribavirin is much more efficient than either of these drugs tested alone with respect to HCV RNA clearance (40,41). There is a possibility that the combination therapy could be one choice of therapies for HCV-positive diabetic nephropathy.

However, the decline in renal function reflected by 1/SCr was also significantly greater in the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group when the patients with MPGN, MN, or cirrhosis were excluded. Therefore, the above-mentioned mechanisms are not enough to explain the rapid progression of HCV-positive II-DGS. As a possible mechanism to link HCV to diabetes, it has been postulated that HCV could infect pancreatic islet cells and thereby directly induce damage to ß cells (10). HCV RNA has been reported to be detected in the heart of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and this suggests that HCV may replicate in the heart and could play a role in cardiac hypertrophy (31). Therefore, the possibility that HCV may infect renal tissue, such as mesangial cells, and contribute to renal damage directly cannot be excluded. In the present study, only 75% of II-DGS patients with HCV antibody had detectable HCV RNA. Regarding this point, there is a possibility that if all patients were tested for HCV RNA by RT-PCR, the percentage of patients with detectable HCV RNA would be higher since branched DNA probe assay is not as sensitive as RT-PCR (19).

In conclusion, we must pay attention to HCV infection in diabetic patients, since a high prevalence of HCV infection is observed and it may have an adverse effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy. However, the accurate reason for the rapid progression of HCV-positive II-DGS remains uncertain. Our study lacked the investigation of HCV RNA on renal biopsy tissue, because the examination of HCV was simply a screening test for renal biopsy. Additional studies are warranted to explain the rapid progression of II-DGS with HCV infection for an effective treatment for diabetic nephropathy and to clarify a possible etiopathologenic role of HCV in diabetes itself. Finally, we must comment that it is uncertain whether the HCV-related rapid decline in renal function is a peculiar phenomenon in II-DGS. It is important to study whether this is also the case in other renal diseases such as MPGN and MN.


    Acknowledgments
 
Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a research grant (Progressive Renal Lesions) from the Intractable Disease Division, Public Health Bureau, Ministry of Health Welfare, Japan, and by a research grant from the Miyagi Prefecture Kidney Association, Japan. The authors thank all the doctors of our associated units for their helpful information about patients, Noriko Tsuchiya and Kiyomi Kisu for their technical assistance, and Drs. Ichiro Tsuji and Atsushi Hohzawa for their kind advice on statistical analyses.


    Footnotes
 
This study was presented in part at the 31st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, October 25-28, 1998, Philadelphia, PA (J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 123A, 1998).

American Society of Nephrology


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Teraoka S, Toma H, Nihei H, Ota K, Babazono T, Ishikawa I, Shinoda A, Maeda K, Koshikawa S, Takahashi T, Sonoda T: Current status of renal replacement therapy in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis25 : 152-164,1995
  2. D'Amico G: Renal replacement therapy throughout the world: The registries. Comparability of different registries on renal replacement therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 25:113 -118, 1995[Medline]
  3. The Kroc Collaborative Study Group: Diabetic nephropathy after two years of intensified insulin treatment. Follow-up of the Kroc Collaborative Study. JAMA 260:37 -41, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mogensen CE: Long-term antihypertensive treatment inhibiting progression of diabetic nephropathy. Br Med J285 : 685-688,1982
  5. Nelson RG, Pettitt DJ, Carraher MJ, Baird HR, Knowler WC: Effect of proteinuria on mortality in NIDDM. Diabetes37 : 1499-1504,1988[Abstract]
  6. Mulec H, Johnson SA, Björck S: Relation between serum cholesterol and diabetic nephropathy. Lancet 335:1537 -1538, 1990
  7. Friedman EA: Race and diabetic nephropathy. Transplant Proc 19(Suppl 2):77 -81, 1987
  8. Seaquist ER, Goetz FC, Rich S, Barbosa J: Familial clustering of diabetic kidney disease: Evidence of genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 320:1161 -1165, 1989[Abstract]
  9. Tanaka E, Kiyosawa K, Sodeyama T, Hayata T, Ohike Y, Nakano Y, Yoshizawa K, Furuta S, Watanabe Y, Watanabe J, Nishioka K: Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus in Japanese schoolchildren: Comparison with adult blood donors. Am J Trop Med Hyg46 : 460-464,1992
  10. Simó R, Hernández C, Genescà J, Jardí R, Mesa J: High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care19 : 998-1000,1996[Abstract]
  11. Özyilkan E, Ebas T, Simsek H, Telatar F, Kayhan B, Telatar H: Increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med235 : 283-284,1994[Medline]
  12. Argani S, Chung RT, Bloch KJ, Pascual M, Bazari H: HCV-positive and HCV-negative cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis: Different patterns of disease progression [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol9 : 83A,1998
  13. Kasuno K, Muso E, Ono T, Matsumori A, Sasayama S: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection aggravates interstitial change in patients with membranous nephropathy (MN): A clinicopathologic and quantitative morphometric study [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol9 : 534A,1998
  14. Sherwin RS: Diabetes mellitus. In: Cecil Textbook of Medicine, edited by Bennett JC, Plum F, 20th Ed., Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996, pp 1258-1277
  15. Churg J, Bernstein J, Glassock RJ: Renal Disease: Classification and Atlas of Glomerular Diseases, 2nd Ed., Tokyo, Igaku-shoin, 1995
  16. Gellman DD, Dirani CL, Soothill JF, Muehrcke RC, Kark RM: Diabetic nephropathy: A clinical pathologic study on renal biopsies. Medicine 38:321 -367, 1959[Medline]
  17. Furuta T, Saito T, Ootaka T, Soma J, Obara K, Abe K, Yoshinaga K: The role of macrophages in diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Am J Kidney Dis 21: 480-485,1993[Medline]
  18. Okamoto H, Okada S, Sugiyama Y, Tanaka T, Sugai Y, Akahane Y, Machida A, Mishiro S, Yoshizawa H, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA by a two-stage polymerase chain reaction with two pairs of primers deduced from the 5'-noncoding region. Jpn J Exp Med 60: 215-222,1990[Medline]
  19. Lau JYN, Davis GL, Kniffen J, Qian KP, Urdea MS, Chan CS, Mizokami M, Nuewald PD, Wilber JC: Significance of serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels in chronic hepatitis C. Lancet341 : 1501-1504,1993[Medline]
  20. Mitch WE, Walser M, Buffington GA, Lemann Jr J: A simple method of estimating progression of chronic renal failure. Lancet ii:1326 -1328, 1976
  21. Zucchelli P, Zuccala A, Borghi M, Fusaroli M, Sasdelli M, Stallone C, Sanna G, Gaggi R: Long-term comparison between captopril and nifedipine in the progression of renal insufficiency. Kidney Int42 : 452-458,1992[Medline]
  22. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6: 03, Cary, NC, SAS Institute, Inc., 1989
  23. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD: The effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 329:1456 -1462, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ravid M, Savin H, Jutrin I, Bental T, Katz B, Lishner M: Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 118:577 -581, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Johnson RJ, Gretch DR, Yamabe H, Hart J, Bacchi C, Hartwell P, Couser WG, Corey L, Wener MH, Alpers CE, Willson R: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis-associated hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 328: 465-470,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yamabe H, Johnson RJ, Gretch DR, Fukushi K, Osawa H, Miyata M, Inuma H, Sasaki T, Kaizuka M, Tamura N, Tsunoda S, Fujita Y, Onodera K: Hepatitis C virus infection and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in Japan. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:220 -223, 1995[Abstract]
  27. Okada K, Takishita Y, Shimomura H, Tsuji T, Miyamura T, Kuhara T, Yasutomo K, Kagami S, Kuroda Y: Detection of hepatitis C virus core protein in the glomeruli of patients with membranous glomerulonephritis. Clin Nephrol 45:71 -76, 1996[Medline]
  28. Kiyosawa K, Furuta S: Review of hepatitis C in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:383 -391, 1991[Medline]
  29. Allison MED, Wreghitt T, Palmer CR, Alexander GJM: Evidence for a link between hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes mellitus in a cirrhotic population. J Hepatol 21:1135 -1139, 1994[Medline]
  30. Gumber SC, Chopra S: Hepatitis C: A multifaceted disease. Review of extrahepatic manifestations. Ann Intern Med123 : 615-620,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Matsumori A, Matoba Y, Nishio R, Shioi T, Ono K, Sasayama S: Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA from the heart of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 222:678 -682, 1996[Medline]
  32. Ueno Y, Kinoshita R, Kishimoto I, Okamoto S: Polyarthritis associated with hepatitis C virus infection. Br J Rheumatol 33:289 -291, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Jorgensen C, Legouffe MC, Perney P, Coste J, Tissot B, Segarra C, Bologna C, Bourrat L, Combe B, Blanc F, Sany J: Sicca syndrome associated with hepatitis C virus infection. Arthritis Rheum39 : 1166-1171,1996[Medline]
  34. O'Neill WM, Wallin JD, Walker PD: Hematuria and red blood cell casts in typical diabetic nephropathy. Am J Med74 : 389-395,1983[Medline]
  35. Appel GB, D'Agati V, Bergman M, Pirani CL: Nephrotic syndrome and immune complex glomerulonephritis associated with chlorpropamide therapy. Am J Med 74:337 -342, 1983[Medline]
  36. Cavallo T, Pinto JA, Rajaraman S: Immune complex disease complicating diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Am J Nephrol4 : 347-354,1984[Medline]
  37. Alter MJ, Margolis HS, Krawczynski K, Judson FN, Mares A, Alexander WJ, Hu PY, Miller JK, Gerber MA, Sampliner RE, Meeks EL, Beach MJ, for The Sentinel Countries Chronic non-A, non-B Hepatitis Study Team: The natural history of community-acquired hepatitis C in the United States. N Engl J Med 327:1899 -1905, 1992[Abstract]
  38. Brady HR, Brenner BM, Lieberthal W: Pathogenesis of renal disease: Acute renal failure. In: The Kidney, Vol.2 , 5th Ed., edited by Brenner BM, Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996, pp 1200-1238
  39. Di Bisceglie AM, Martin P, Kassianides CK, Lisker-Melman M, Murray L, Waggoner J, Goodman Z, Banks SM, Hoofnagle JH: Recombinant interferon alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis C: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med 321:1506 -1510, 1989[Abstract]
  40. McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Schiff ER, Schiffman ML, Rustgi VK, Goodman ZD, Ling MH, Cort S, Albrecht JK: Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 339:1485 -1492, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Davis GL, Esteban-Mur R, Rustgi V, Hoefs J, Gordon SC, Trepo C, Shiffman ML, Zeuzem S, Craxi A, Ling MH, Albrecht J: Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 339:1493 -1499, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication February 18, 1999. Accepted for publication August 23, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Swaminathan, V. A. Fonseca, M. G. Alam, and S. V. Shah
The Role of Iron in Diabetes and Its Complications
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(7): 1926 - 1933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. I. Tsui, E. Vittinghoff, M. G. Shlipak, D. Bertenthal, J. Inadomi, R. A. Rodriguez, and A. M. O'Hare
Association of Hepatitis C Seropositivity With Increased Risk for Developing End-stage Renal Disease
Arch Intern Med, June 25, 2007; 167(12): 1271 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C.-S. Wang, S.-T. Wang, W.-J. Yao, T.-T. Chang, and P. Chou
Community-based Study of Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Type 2 Diabetes: An Association Affected by Age and Hepatitis Severity Status
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1154 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. A. Gentil, E. Luna, G. Rodriguez-Algarra, A. Osuna, M. Gonzalez-Molina, A. Mazuecos, J. J. Cubero, and D. del Castillo
Incidence of diabetes mellitus requiring insulin treatment after renal transplantation in patients with hepatitis C
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SOMA, J.
Right arrow Articles by ITO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SOMA, J.
Right arrow Articles by ITO, S.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP