Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHARPE, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by HENDRY, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHARPE, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by HENDRY, B. M.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:1600-1606, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

Role of Ras Isoforms in the Stimulated Proliferation of Human Renal Fibroblasts in Primary Culture

CLAIRE C. SHARPE*, MARK E. C. DOCKRELL*, MAZHAR I. NOOR*, BRETT P. MONIA{dagger} and BRUCE M. HENDRY*

* Cell Signalling Group, Department of Renal Medicine, Guy's, King's College and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Molecular Pharmacology, ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California.

Correspondence to Dr. Bruce M. Hendry, Department of Renal Medicine, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-171-346-3741; Fax: 44-171-346-3742; E-mail: bruce.hendry{at}kcl.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. The proliferation of renal fibroblasts is implicated in the pathophysiologic processes of renal fibrosis. Many of the growth factors involved in proliferation are known to activate intracellular signaling pathways that converge on Ras monomeric GTPases. Although three ras family genes exist, their functional specificity is not yet known. Using antisense oligonucleotides, a role for Kirsten (Ki)-Ras in the stimulated proliferation of a primate renal fibroblast cell line was previously demonstrated. This study examines Ras in primary cultures of adult human renal fibroblasts. Using reverse transcription-PCR, mRNA for Harvey (Ha)-ras, Ki(4B)-ras, and neural (N)-ras, but not Ki(4A)-ras, were detected. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting Ha-, Ki-, and N-ras mRNA, which were used for liposomal transfection at 100 to 200 nM, were demonstrated to be active and isoform-specific in quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays. Cellular Ras protein levels, as estimated using isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies, indicated that Ki-Ras was the predominantly expressed isoform (>95% of total Ras protein) under both serum-containing and serum-free conditions, with N- and Ha-Ras being detected in small amounts. Consistent with this finding, the antisense oligonucleotide directed against Ki-Ras reduced total cellular Ras levels by >70%, whereas Ha-Ras, N-Ras, and control oligonucleotides had no significant effect. Proliferation of oligonucleotide-transfected cells was measured using epidermal growth factor (EGF) and serum stimulation. The Ki-Ras oligonucleotide at 100 nM reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by >50% and EGF-stimulated proliferation by 25%, compared with data obtained with the control oligonucleotide (P < 0.01). The N-Ras oligonucleotide was not active, compared with the control oligonucleotide. The Ha-Ras oligonucleotide was not significantly active at 100 nM but reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by 13% and EGF-stimulated growth by 40% at 200 nM (P < 0.01). These results demonstrate that Ki-Ras(4B) is the predominantly expressed Ras isoform in human renal fibroblasts in primary culture and is important for both serum- and EGF-stimulated proliferation. Ha-Ras appears to be expressed at low levels but may also play a distinct role in stimulated proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Renal injury can initiate a process of fibrosis and scarring, eventually leading to chronic renal failure. The mechanisms involved include inflammation, the recruitment, activation, and proliferation of fibroblasts, and the secretion of extracellular matrix (1,2). These events are self-limiting in normal tissue healing, but the process continues unchecked in the case of pathologic fibrosis. Fibrosis is not the outcome of a single event but results from complex relationships among multiple cytokine pathways and from integrin-mediated cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, with fibroblast proliferation and matrix deposition as the final outcomes (3). Elucidation of the cellular and molecular events that underlie these outcomes can lead to the establishment of effective therapeutic strategies.

A host of cytokines, growth factors, and integrins have been implicated in this pathogenic process, including transforming growth factor ß1, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor, thrombin, angiotensin II, interleukins 1, 6, and 8, endothelin-1, and {alpha}1, {alpha}2, {alpha}5, {alpha}v, and ß1 integrins (2,3,4,5,6,7,8). Although each of these factors activates a specific cell surface receptor, many of their intracellular transduction pathways have been demonstrated to converge on the Ras monomeric GTPases, which act as molecular switches transducing signals to downstream effector cascades (9,10,11). For this reason, we chose to investigate strategies designed to inhibit the function of Ras in stimulated renal fibroblasts.

Three closely related isoforms of Ras, known as Harvey (Ha)-, Kirsten (Ki)-, and neural (N)-Ras, are expressed in mammalian cells. Ki-Ras may be expressed in two splice variants, Ki(4A) and Ki(4B), which differ in their terminal fourth exon. The specific functions of these isoforms have not yet been fully elucidated. We previously presented evidence that Ki-Ras is the predominantly expressed isoform in a primate renal fibroblast cell line (Vero), where it is the only isoform involved in EGF-, fibroblast growth factor-, and serum-stimulated proliferation (12).

This work is a study of Ras isoforms in adult human renal fibroblasts in primary culture and was designed to establish which isoforms are expressed and involved in the stimulation of proliferation. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and Ras isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies were used to define expression. 2'-O-Methoxyethyl-modified chimeric phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides were used to block translation of specific Ras isoforms during serum- and EGF-stimulated cell proliferation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
Mouse anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibody (clone Ras 10), rat antipan-Ras monoclonal antibody (Y13-259)-agarose conjugate, and recombinant Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, and N-Ras proteins (for use as standards) were obtained from Calbiochem (Nottingham, UK). Santa Cruz supplied anti-Ki-Ras (F234), anti-H-Ras (F235), and anti-N-Ras (F155) monoclonal antibodies. We also received recombinant Ras protein standards as a kind gift from Dr. Alan Wolfman, Lerner Institute (Cleveland, OH).

Primary Fibroblast Culture
Tumor-free renal cortex was obtained from four native kidneys, all of which had been removed because of renal cell carcinoma. No other renal condition had been diagnosed for any of the patients. Ethical permission for this use of renal tissue was obtained from the King's College Hospital ethics committee. After removal of the capsule, the cortex was minced and digested in a 1 mg/ml solution of collagenase type IV (Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, Dorset, UK). The digest was passed through a 70-µm mesh, to remove contaminating glomeruli and tubules, and then separated on a 50% Percoll density gradient (containing 0.84 g of mannitol and 100 µl of 1 M HCl in 30 ml) by centrifugation at 30,000 x g. The top band (F1) was seeded onto 10-cm culture dishes (90 mg/dish) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/Ham's F-12 Nut-mix (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies Ltd., Paisley, UK) with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), allowed to grow to confluence, and then passaged twice in the presence of serum, to specifically select for fibroblast growth. The cells were typed by immunocytochemical methods and stained positively for vimentin and negatively for cytokeratin. Approximately 95% of cells were phenotypically fibroblastic after two passages.

Oligonucleotides
The antisense oligonucleotides used were single-stranded, phosphorothioate, 20-mer, 2'-methoxyethyl-modified oligonucleotides (13) targeted to Ha-ras (ISIS 13920; sequence, 5'-TCCGT-CATCGCTCCTCAGGG-3'; binds to Ha-ras mRNA at the initiation start site codon, AUG), Ki-ras (ISIS 15170; sequence, 5'-CAGTGCCTGCGCCGCGCTCG-3'; binds to the 5' untranslated region of Ki-ras mRNA), and N-ras (ISIS 16737; sequence, 5'-CCATACAACCCTGAGTCCCA-3'; binds to the 3' untranslated region of N-ras mRNA). An oligonucleotide complementary to a part of the HIV promoter sequence was used as a control (ISIS 15167; sequence, 5'-TCAGTAATAGCCCCACATGG-3'). This control sequence is not complementary to any known part of the human genome. The Ki-Ras oligonucleotide, which is complementary to a region close to the initiation codon, would be expected to affect both splice variants (4A and 4B).

The oligonucleotides were transfected into the cells using Lipofectin (Life Technologies BRL), with 6- to 18-h incubations at oligonucleotide concentrations of 100 to 200 nM. An initial solution of Lipofectin at 6 to 12 µl/ml OptiMEM (Life Technologies) was vortex-mixed and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. Oligonucleotide was then added, and the vortex-mixed solution was maintained for an additional 15 min before being added to the cells. The Lipofectin/oligonucleotide ratio was 0.3 µl/10 pmol in each case.

RT-PCR
To determine which isoforms of ras are transcribed in the primary culture cells, isoform-specific primers were designed for use in RT-PCR. These were as follows: N-ras: forward, 5'-GAAAAGCGCACTGACAATCC-3'; reverse, 5'-CACCACACATGGCAATCCC-3'; Ki-ras: forward, 5'-AGTGCCTTGACGATACAG-3'; reverse, Ki(4B), 5'-GCATCATCAACACCCTGTCTT-3' (spanning the exon 3-exon 4B junction); Ki(4A), 5'-AAGAAGAAAAGACTCCTGG-3' (in exon 4A); Ha-ras: forward, 5'-CAAGAGTGCGCTGACCATCC-3'; reverse, 5'-CCGGATCTCACGCACCAAC-3'. Cells were grown to 80% confluence in DMEM/Ham's F-12 Nut-mix with 10% FCS, in 75-cm2 flasks, and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, and total RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy mini-kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK). To assess the effects of the oligonucleotides on mRNA levels, the cells were transfected with 200 nM oligonucleotide for 16 h, followed by immediate RNA extraction, as described above. The RT and amplification reactions were performed using a Promega Access RT-PCR kit (Promega, Southampton, UK), following the instructions provided by the manufacturer, with 0.5 µg of total RNA. The annealing temperatures used were 63°C for Ha- and N-ras and 59°C for Ki(4A)- and Ki(4B)-ras. As an internal standard, 18S ribosomal RNA primers combined with primer competimers in a 3:7 ratio were used. These were supplied in the Ambion Quantum RNA 18S internal standards kit (Ambion, Whitney, Oxfordshire, UK). The optimal primer/competimer ratio was determined by serial alterations, following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Ten percent of the reaction products were analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

For initial detection of ras isoform mRNA, 35 cycles of PCR were used. The linear phase of the amplification reaction was identified for each primer pair by varying the cycle number from 10 to 40. Ten percent of the reaction mixture was observed on an agarose gel, and the bands were analyzed using densitometry. For each pair, a cycle number in the linear phase of amplification was used in experiments to determine the effects of the antisense oligonucleotides on mRNA levels for that isoform.

Western Blotting
For Western blotting experiments, human fibroblasts were grown to 50 to 80% confluence in 35- or 100-mm plates, in DMEM/Ham's F-12 Nut-mix containing 10% FCS. Cell lysis detergent medium was composed of 1 x phosphate-buffered saline, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 1.0 µg/ml pepstatin, 1.0 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. At this point, cells were either lysed or, for experiments involving the oligonucleotides, transfected for 16 h with 200 nM oligonucleotide in OptiMEM. After transfection, the medium was removed and replaced with DMEM/Ham's F-12 Nut-mix containing 10% FCS. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed. Nuclear debris was removed by centrifugation at 2300 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Cell lysates were assayed for protein content, and equal amounts of protein were made up to a uniform volume. Immunoprecipitation was performed by adding 15 µl of rat anti-pan-Ras antibody-agarose conjugate (clone Y13-259)/ml lysate and shaking the mixture overnight at 4°C. Pellets were then resuspended in 40 µl of Western sample buffer containing 5% 2-mercaptoethanol and were heated to 100°C for 3 min. The agarose was removed by pelleting for 10 s, and the supernatants were collected, cooled, and loaded on a 4%/15% discontinuous polyacrylamide gel. After blotting, detection was performed using either an anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibody (mouse anti-pan-Ras antibody clone Ras 10, 1.0 µg/ml) or the isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies. The dilutions of the isoform-specific antibodies used were determined using slot-blot analysis with the recombinant proteins. The concentrations chosen yielded equivalent densitometric signals for 200 ng of the specific isoforms, without cross-reaction with the other isoforms. This method was previously described (12).

Cell Proliferation
To study the actions of oligonucleotides on proliferation, human fibroblasts were trypsinized, resuspended in OptiMEM, and placed in triplicate in 96-well plates (5000 cells/well). A 200 to 400 nM oligonucleotide-Lipofectin suspension was added, to yield a final oligonucleotide concentration of 100 to 200 nM, and cells were incubated for 14 to 18 h. Extracellular oligonucleotide was then removed, and cells were grown in minimum essential medium with either 1000 ng/ml EGF or 10% FCS. The growth incubation was performed at 37°C in 95% O2/5% CO2, and cell numbers were determined at 0 and 48 h after transfection. The plating densities determined from the time 0 measurements demonstrated <5% variability between wells in individual experiments. Cell numbers were determined in MTS assays (Cell Titer 96; Promega), with measurement of absorbance at 490 nm. The MTS assay is a tetrazolium salt-based assay of viable cell numbers, and the correlation between cell number and absorbance at 490 nm is linear (14).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To assess the transfection efficiency of the antisense oligonucleotides, a FITC-labeled control oligonucleotide was transfected into the primary culture cells at a concentration of 200 nM. Figure 1 shows a sample field viewed using phase-contrast microscopy (Figure 1A) and fluorescence microscopy (Figure 1B). Seven fields were viewed in two separate experiments, and a 90.1% (SEM, 4.1%) transfection efficiency was observed.



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Efficiency of transfection of cells with a FITC-labeled control oligonucleotide. (A) Phase-contrast view of a field of cells. Magnification, x400. (B) The same field, viewed using fluorescent microscopy.

 

Figure 2 illustrates the RT-PCR detection of mRNA for the various ras isoforms, as well as the 18S ribosomal subunit, which acts as an internal control. Figure 2A demonstrates the presence of mRNA for Ha- and N-ras and the Ki(4B) splice variant of Ki-ras. Ki(4A)-ras mRNA could not be detected.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. (A) Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for the four isoforms of ras, compared with the 18S ribosomal subunit. Cells were grown to 80% confluence in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Total RNA was extracted and 0.5 µg was used for each isoform-specific RT-PCR, using 35 cycles. Ten percent of the reaction mixture was analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel. (B) Study of the actions of the Ras antisense oligonucleotides targeting Harvey (Ha)-ras, Kirsten (Ki)-ras, and neural (N)-ras, compared with the control oligonucleotide (Ctrl) and the 18S ribosomal subunit. Cells were grown to 50% confluence and transfected with the antisense oligonucleotides for 16 h, followed by total RNA extraction. RT-PCR for Ki(4B)-ras was performed in the linear range of the reaction (27 cycles), and products were analyzed as described above. (C) RT-PCR for Ha-ras, using RNA prepared after transfection with antisense oligonucleotides as described above. (D) RT-PCR for N-ras (26 cycles), using RNA prepared as described above. All results are representative of three similar experiments.

 

Figure 2 (B to D) shows experiments designed to examine the activity and specificity of the antisense oligonucleotides, using linear-range RT-PCR. Figure 2B presents RT-PCR products obtained using Ki(4B)-ras primers with mRNA from cells treated with each of the four oligonucleotides. Incubation with the Ki-Ras antisense oligonucleotide at 200 nM for 16 h abolished the Ki(4B)-ras RT-PCR product; the Ha-Ras and N-Ras antisense oligonucleotides were inactive, compared with the control oligonucleotide. Similarly, Figure 2C was obtained using the Ha-ras primers and demonstrates depletion of Ha-ras mRNA by the Ha-Ras antisense oligonucleotide alone. Figure 2D demonstrates that the N-Ras oligonucleotide is equally specific in the depletion of mRNA for its target isoform. These results demonstrate specific effects of the three Ras antisense oligonucleotides on the levels of cellular mRNA for each isoform.

Western blot analysis was performed to assess which Ras protein isoforms were present and in what relative quantities. Cells grown in 10% FCS were lysed, either immediately or after 30 h in serum-free medium, immunoprecipitated with an anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibody, and immunodetected with isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies, as shown in Figure 3A. The predominant isoform detected was Ki-Ras (representing >95% of the total Ras protein detected). Small quantities of N-Ras were detected when levels were analyzed using densitometry. Ha-Ras either was not detected or was detected in only very small quantities. The removal of serum for 30 h had no effect on either total Ras expression or the pattern of expression of the individual isoforms.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. (A) Western blot for isoforms of Ras. Cells were grown to 60% confluence in medium containing 10% FCS. The cells were then maintained either in the presence of 10% serum or under serum-free conditions for 30 h, followed by lysis in cell lysis detergent medium. After normalization on the basis of total extracted protein, the Ras immunoprecipitate [using anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibodies (mAb)] for each condition was divided equally among the four lanes of a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel and detected with the isoform-specific antibody indicated. (B) Western blot of total cellular Ras immunoprecipitate 24 h after transfection with Ki-Ras or Ha-Ras antisense oligonucleotide, compared with a control oligonucleotide (Ctrl) or Lipofectin alone (nil). The blot was immunodetected with anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibodies.

 

The effects of the antisense oligonucleotides on the total cellular expression of Ras were studied. Cells were transfected with antisense oligonucleotides at 200 nM or treated with Lipofectin alone, and protein was extracted 24 h later. Figure 3B presents a Western blot analysis of the expression of total Ras protein after these treatments; the immunodetection was performed using an anti-pan-Ras monoclonal antibody. The Ki-Ras antisense oligonucleotide markedly reduced total cellular Ras levels (by 70 to 85%), compared with the Ha-Ras or control oligonucleotides (which were inactive, compared with cells undergoing mock transfection with Lipofectin alone). The N-Ras oligonucleotide also had no effect on total cellular Ras levels (data not shown).

Figure 4 demonstrates the effects of Ras antisense oligonucleotides on the serum-stimulated proliferation of human renal fibroblasts in primary culture. Cell numbers were measured after a 48-h incubation with 10% serum after transfection with oligonucleotides. The Ki-Ras oligonucleotide at 100 nM reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by >50%, compared with data obtained with the control oligonucleotide (P < 0.01). The N-Ras oligonucleotide was not active, compared with the control oligonucleotide. The Ha-Ras oligonucleotide was not significantly active at 100 nM, but it reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by 13% at 200 nM (P < 0.01).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Assay of cell proliferation. Cell numbers were determined (MTS assay, measuring absorbance at 490 nm) after 48 h of incubation in 10% FCS after transfection with the antisense oligonucleotides (A, 100 nM; B, 200 nM). The effects of different Ras oligonucleotides (antisense to Ha-, Ki-, and N-Ras) were compared with control oligonucleotide (Ctrl). The error bars indicate the SEM (n = 6). **P < 0.01.

 

Figure 5 demonstrates the results of experiments on EGF-stimulated proliferation. The Ki-Ras oligonucleotide at 100 nM reduced EGF-stimulated proliferation by 25%, compared with the control oligonucleotide (P < 0.01). The N-Ras oligonucleotide was not active, compared with the control oligonucleotide. The Ha-Ras oligonucleotide was not significantly active at 100 nM but it reduced EGF-stimulated growth by 40% at 200 nM (P < 0.01).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Assay of cell proliferation. Cell numbers were determined (MTS assay, measuring absorbance at 490 nm) after 48 h of incubation with 1 µg/ml epidermal growth factor after transfection with the antisense oligonucleotides (A, 100 nM; B, 200 nM). The effects of different Ras oligonucleotides (antisense to Ha-, Ki-, and N-Ras) were compared with control oligonucleotide (Ctrl). The error bars indicate the SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the RT-PCR experiments presented here demonstrated that mRNA for three isoforms of Ras, i.e., Ha-, Ki(4B)-, and N-Ras, was present in these primary human renal fibroblasts but mRNA for the Ki(4A) splice variant was not. Immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting, as demonstrated in Figure 3, enables relative quantification of the amount of protein for each isoform expressed in the human renal fibroblasts. Ki-Ras was the predominantly expressed isoform detected using isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies (>95% of total Ras protein). Predominant expression of Ki-Ras was also reported for human lung fibroblast (MRC5) and primate renal fibroblast (Vero) cell lines (12,15). In this study of human renal fibroblasts in primary culture, small amounts of both N- and Ha-Ras were also detected. N- and Ha-Ras were not detected in Vero cells (12). Although a number of fibroblast-selective procedures were performed during the preparation of the primary cultures, some contamination of the cultures with other cell types, such as tubular epithelial cells, is unavoidable. Immunocytochemical analysis suggested that this contamination was <5%. The low levels of N- and Ha-Ras detected could be of tubular cell origin. However, another study of primary cultures of human renal tubular cells performed in our laboratory demonstrated equal expression of Ki- and N-Ras, with barely detectable Ha-Ras expression (data not shown). Given these observations, the detection of Ha-Ras in the primary human fibroblast cultures is unlikely to be explained by tubular cell contamination, supporting the hypothesis that these fibroblasts express low levels of Ha-Ras. This conclusion is further supported by the fact that Ha-Ras seems to have a functional role in these human fibroblasts.

Relative quantification of mRNA for each ras isoform during the linear phase of amplification was achieved by comparing the abundance of the product obtained with the relevant primer pair with the abundance of the 18S ribosomal subunit RT-PCR product, as demonstrated in Figure 2. The transfection efficiency for the oligonucleotides used was high (>90%) (Figure 1). This is consistent with the data in Figure 2, showing that the antisense oligonucleotides were both highly effective and specific in reducing the levels of their target mRNA. Additional evidence for the effectiveness of the Ki-Ras antisense oligonucleotide is provided in Figure 4, in which the Ki-Ras antisense oligonucleotide clearly reduced total cellular Ras levels and the other oligonucleotides tested exhibited no action.

Ki-Ras not only is the predominantly expressed isoform but also is of functional significance in the control of proliferation, as demonstrated in Figures 4 and 5. In both serum- and EGF-stimulated growth assays, the Ki-Ras antisense oligonucleotide was able to significantly reduce cell proliferation, even at the lower oligonucleotide concentration. Although apparently present in low abundance, Ha-Ras also seems to play a distinct role in the stimulation of proliferation. The antiproliferative effect of the Ha-Ras antisense oligonucleotide at 200 nM in serum-stimulated growth assays was not as large as the effect of the Ki-Ras oligonucleotide (13 versus 23%). In EGF-stimulated growth assays, however, the Ki- and Ha-Ras oligonucleotides reduced proliferation equally, by approximately 40%. These results suggest that Ki- and Ha-Ras have distinct roles in the control of proliferation and that both are independently necessary for EGF-stimulated growth. The partial suppression of proliferation by the Ki- and Ha-Ras oligonucleotides does not seem to be the result of inefficient transfection, with a complete inhibitory action on only a subpopulation of cells. It is likely that Ras-independent pathways for the stimulation of proliferation also exist in these cells. Although the relative effects of different Ras isoforms may vary under different growth conditions, this does not seem to be attributable to changes in either total cellular Ras levels or the relative quantities of the isoforms. Serum starvation had no effect on Ras expression (normalized to total cellular protein levels), compared with growth in the presence of 10% FCS (Figure 3A), suggesting that the overall pattern of Ras expression in these cells remains stable.

Although little is known regarding the specific function of each of the Ras isoforms, there is increasing evidence that the isoforms do participate in distinct signal transduction pathways, which would enable them to have individual biologic roles. Many of the cell surface receptors originally identified as acting through Ras were receptor tyrosine kinases; more recently, G-protein-coupled receptors and integrins have been demonstrated to activate Ras-dependent pathways (9,10,11,16). These different cell surface receptors (directly or indirectly) influence the activation state of Ras via a group of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. These factors bind to Ras and cause it to disassociate from GDP and bind to GTP, thereby activating it. An opposing group of GTPase-activating proteins regulate this process by enhancing the intrinsic ability of Ras to hydrolyze GTP to GDP, thereby turning off the signal (17). Many guanine nucleotide exchange factors have been identified, some of which have been shown to be receptor type- and Ras isoform-specific (18,19), suggesting that individual growth factors and hormones may be able to activate individual isoforms of Ras.

Downstream, Ras is known to bind many effectors with different functional end points, although the relative affinities of the isoforms for the various effectors may differ. Voice et al. (20) recently demonstrated that the four human Ras isoforms differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1, with Ki(4B)-Ras being the most efficient, followed by Ki(4A)-, N-, and Ha-Ras (in descending order). Hamilton and Wolfman (21) demonstrated in murine fibroblasts that N-Ras had a higher affinity for Raf-1 than did Ha-Ras, although both were able to transform cells when constitutively active. The transforming ability of Ha-Ras was abrogated when N-Ras was removed, suggesting that this second isoform was required for effective Ha-Ras transformation. A study by Yan et al. (22) that compared Ki- and Ha-Ras suggested that Ki-Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane more efficiently than does Ha-Ras but Ha-Ras is a more potent activator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. One possible origin of these differences involves the different orientations of Ras isoforms at the inner leaflet of the cell membrane, which arise from the presence of a polybasic region near the carboxylterminus of Ki(4B)-Ras, compared with an S-acyl group for Ha-Ras (23).

When these data are considered together with the results presented in this report, it seems likely that the different isoforms of Ras regulate proliferation via different downstream cascades, and more than one isoform may be necessary for sustained growth. Seufferlein et al. (24) recently demonstrated that transforming growth factor {alpha}-stimulated cell growth in two pancreatic cancer cell lines possessing oncogenic Ki-ras mutations is dependent on the activation of Ha-Ras. This unexpected result supports the concept that Ki-Ras and Ha-Ras play distinct roles in the control of cell proliferation. In our previous work, we demonstrated the predominant role of Ki-Ras in the stimulated proliferation of the Vero primate renal fibroblast cell line. This predominant role was also demonstrated by Chen et al. (15) in a human lung fibroblast cell line. The work on primary human cultures presented here demonstrates that Ha-Ras may also play an important role in renal fibroblast proliferation, and it is this result that is more likely to reflect the isoform-specific expression and function of Ras in renal fibroblasts in vivo. Whether this Ras expression pattern is maintained for fibroblasts in both the quiescent and stimulated states in vivo needs to be examined in both normal and early fibrosing renal tissue. This could be achieved most effectively using enhanced in situ hybridization techniques to study both cell type- and condition-dependent Ras expression. When this issue has been clarified, it will be possible to assess whether a specific Ras isoform, such as Ki- or Ha-Ras, might be suitable as a therapeutic target in renal fibrosis.

Ras has been a target for therapeutic intervention since it was discovered to be mutated in 30% of human cancers (25,26,27). Many of the agents investigated were designed to inhibit post-translational modification of Ras. To become membrane-bound (enabling activation), Ras is prenylated, usually by the addition of a farnesyl group (23,26). The enzyme that catalyzes this process, farnesyltransferase, is the target of highly specific inhibitors, which are currently undergoing trials among patients with cancer (26). These inhibitors may be useful future tools for the prevention of renal fibrosis, but they offer little Ras isoform specificity. To obtain this specificity, antisense oligonucleotides could themselves be used for therapeutic intervention. There is some evidence that oligonucleotides can be targeted to different cell types within the kidney, thereby increasing the specificity of the system and reducing unwanted side effects. One possible strategy uses liposome vectors modified from the hemagglutinating virus of Japan. These are able to deliver DNA to either tubular cells or interstitial fibroblasts, depending on the lipid composition of the vector (28). By targeting the Ras isoforms in this way, it may be possible to directly influence renal interstitial fibroblast proliferation and circumvent the problem of redundancy of the numerous cytokines and growth factors that have been implicated in this pathologic process.


    Acknowledgments
 
CCS is supported by a Clinical Training Fellowship from the National Kidney Research Fund.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Groma V: Demonstration of collagen type VI and alpha-smooth muscle actin in renal fibrotic injury in man. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:305 -312, 1998
  2. Sommer M, Schaller R, Funfstuck R, Bohle A, Bohmer FD, Muller GA, Stein G: Abnormal growth and clonal proliferation of fibroblasts in an animal model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Nephron82 : 39-50,1999[Medline]
  3. Franklin TJ: Therapeutic approaches to organ fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29:79 -89, 1997[Medline]
  4. El Nahas AM, Muchaneta-Kubra EC, Essawy M, Soylemezoglu O: Renal fibrosis: Insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29:55 -62, 1997[Medline]
  5. Norman JT, Fine LG: Progressive renal disease: Fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, and integrins. Exp Nephrol7 : 167-177,1999[Medline]
  6. Border WA, Noble NA: TGF-beta in kidney fibrosis: A target for gene therapy. Kidney Int 51:1388 -1396, 1997[Medline]
  7. Johnson RJ: Cytokines, growth factors and renal injury: Where do we go now? Kidney Int 52[Suppl 63]: S2-S6, 1997
  8. Abboud HE: Role of platelet derived growth factor in renal injury. Annu Rev Physiol 57:297 -309, 1995[Medline]
  9. Bos JL: p21ras: An oncoprotein functioning in growth factor-induced signal transduction. Eur J Cancer31A : 1051-1054,1995
  10. Luttrell LM, Daaka Y, Della Rocca GJ, Lefkowitz RJ: G protein-coupled receptors mediate two functionally distinct pathways of tyrosine phosphorylation in rat la fibroblasts: She phosphorylation and receptor endocytosis correlate with activation of Erk kinases. J Biol Chem 272:31648 -31656, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Buday L, Downward J: Epidermal growth factor regulates the exchange rate of guanine nucleotides on p21ras in fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 13:1903 -1910, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sharpe CC, Dockrell MEC, Scott R, Noor MI, Cowsert LM, Monia BP, Hendry BM: Evidence of a role for Ki-Ras in the stimulated proliferation of renal fibroblasts. J Am Soc Nephrol10 : 1186-1192,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Monia BP: First- and second-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitors targeted to human c-raf kinase: In vitro and in vivo studies. Anti-Cancer Drug Design12 : 327-339,1997[Medline]
  14. Cory AH, Owen TC, Barltrop JA, Cory JG: Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture. Cancer Commun 3:207 -212, 1991[Medline]
  15. Chen G, Oh S, Monia BP, Stacey DW: Antisense oligonucleotides demonstrate a dominant role of c-Ki-RAS proteins in regulating the proliferation of diploid human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 271:28259 -28265, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Howe AK, Juliano RL: Distinct mechanisms mediate the initial and sustained phases of integrin-mediated activation of the Raf/MEK/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. J Biol Chem 273:27268 -27274, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wittinghofer F: Ras signaling: Caught in the act of the switch-on. Nature (Lond) 394:317 -320, 1998[Medline]
  18. Shou C, Wurmser A, Suen KL, Barbacid M, Feig LA: Differential response of the Ras exchange factor, Ras-GRF, to tyrosine kinase and G protein mediated signals. Oncogene 10:1887 -1893, 1995[Medline]
  19. Jones MK, Jackson JH: Ras-GRF activates Ha-Ras, but not N-Ras or K-Ras 4B, protein in vivo. J Biol Chem273 : 1782-1787,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Voice JK, Klemke RL, Le A, Jackson JH: Four human ras homologs differ in their abilities to activate raf-1, induce transformation, and stimulate cell motility. J Biol Chem274 : 17164-17170,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hamilton M, Wolfman A: Ha-ras and N-ras regulate MAPK activity by distinct mechanisms in vivo. Oncogene16 : 1417-1428,1998[Medline]
  22. Yan J, Roy S, Apolloni A, Lane A, Hancock JF: Ras isoforms vary in their ability to activate raf-1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. J Biol Chem 273:24052 -24056, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Magee T, Marshall C: New insights into the interaction of Ras with the plasma membrane. Cell 98:9 -12, 1999[Medline]
  24. Seufferlein T, Van Lint J, Liptay S, Adler G, Schmid RM: Transforming growth factor alpha activates Ha-Ras in human pancreatic cancer cells with Ki-ras mutations. Gastroenterology116 : 1441-1452,1999[Medline]
  25. Bos JL: The ras gene family and human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 195:255 -271, 1988[Medline]
  26. Gibbs JB, Oliff A, Kohl NE: Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: Ras research yields a potential cancer therapeutic. Cell77 : 175-178,1994[Medline]
  27. Grunicke HH: Molecular basis of targeted chemotherapy: Novel concepts with special reference to the treatment of Hodgkin's disease. Ann Oncol 9[Suppl 5]:S125 -S128, 1998
  28. Clarke HC, Cook HT, Hendry BM: Gene therapy for renal fibroblasts. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1615 -1617, 1999[Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 31, 1999. Accepted for publication January 11, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J.-H. Wang, B. M. Hendry, and C. C. Sharpe
Silencing genes in the kidney: antisense or RNA interference?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2115 - 2118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. M. Kocher, R. Senkus, M. Al-Nawab, and B. M. Hendry
Subcellular distribution of Ras GTPase isoforms in normal human kidney
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 886 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
A. Singh, A. P. Sowjanya, and G. Ramakrishna
The wild-type Ras: road ahead
FASEB J, February 1, 2005; 19(2): 161 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. M. Williams and C. O. S. Savage
Characterization of the Regulation and Functional Consequences of p21ras Activation in Neutrophils by Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibodies
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 90 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Yamashita, A. Maeshima, I. Kojima, and Y. Nojima
Activin A Is a Potent Activator of Renal Interstitial Fibroblasts
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 91 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. M. Kocher, J. Moorhead, C. C. Sharpe, M. E. C. Dockrell, M. Al-Nawab, and B. M. Hendry
Expression of Ras GTPases in normal kidney and in glomerulonephritis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2284 - 2292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Perez de Castro, R. Diaz, M. Malumbres, M.-I. Hernandez, J. Jagirdar, M. Jimenez, D. Ahn, and A. Pellicer
Mice Deficient for N-ras: Impaired Antiviral Immune Response and T-Cell Function
Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 63(7): 1615 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
H. C. Clarke, H. M. Kocher, A. Khwaja, Y. Kloog, H. T. Cook, and B. M. Hendry
Ras Antagonist Farnesylthiosalicylic Acid (FTS) Reduces Glomerular Cellular Proliferation and Macrophage Number in Rat Thy-1 Nephritis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 848 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. C. Sharpe and B. M. Hendry
Signaling: Focus on Rho in Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 261 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHARPE, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by HENDRY, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHARPE, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by HENDRY, B. M.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP