Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FAVRE, D.
Right arrow Articles by MOULLIER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FAVRE, D.
Right arrow Articles by MOULLIER, P.
J Am Soc Nephrol 11:S149-S153, 2000
© 2000 American Society of Nephrology

Critical Aspects of Viral Vectors for Gene Transfer into the Kidney

DAVID FAVRE, NICOLAS FERRY and PHILIPPE MOULLIER

Gene Therapy Laboratory, CHU Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France.

Correspondence to Dr. Philippe Moullier, Laboratoire de Thérapie Génique, CHU Hotel-Dieu, 44000 Nantes, France. Phone: 33-240087490; Fax: 33-240087491; E-mail: moullier{at}sante.univ-nantes.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
Abstract. Viral vectors have been used in vitro and in vivo for more than a decade, with some significant results in specific situations, e.g., when recombinant adeno-associated virus is used for the long-term transduction of skeletal muscle in coagulation factor IX-deficient patients. However, the kidney has been quite difficult to transduce with any viral vector currently available. When viral transduction occurs, it is often heterogeneous, transient, and eventually associated with immune and toxic side effects. However, recombinant adeno-associated virus and lentiviral vectors remain to be fully evaluated in the kidney; the former is small enough to be filtered through the glomerular basement membrane. This may be critical, because glomerular filtration is required for DNA complex-mediated transduction of tubular cells. An alternative to in situ renal gene transfer is secretion of a therapeutic protein from a distant site, such as skeletal muscle. Several examples provide evidence that this could be a clinically relevant approach. It also may allow accurate determination of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the establishment and maintenance of experimental glomerulonephritis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
Since the initial reports, in 1993 and 1994 (1,2,3,4), of in vivo gene transfer to the kidney, more than 30 original articles have reported the use and limitations of viral and nonviral vectors for gene transfer in animal models of kidney diseases. Information on the structures of genes important for renal and vascular physiologic processes and diseases has been simultaneously described, often in association with the generation of corresponding transgenic mouse models. The combination of these three resources (vectors, candidate genes, and animal models) permitted the rapid evaluation of gene therapy strategies for kidney diseases. The anatomic accessibility of the organ in mammals, including mice, and the availability of the vascular and retrograde routes allow a wide variety of experimental protocols that can be easily monitored. Also, because kidneys are paired organs, the establishment of rigorous internal controls is possible with selective unilateral maneuvers. Additionally, well established isolated perfusion and transplantation procedures in murine models broaden the spectrum of gene transfer strategies for the kidney. Despite these attractive features and the availability of large stocks of high-titer preclinical vectors, the general conclusion after 6 years of investigation in the field is that currently available vectors are unable to efficiently, reproducibly, and stably deliver a foreign gene to specific renal compartments. However, there have been successful examples in which transient expression of a transgene has had therapeutic relevance, with partial phenotypic correction of murine models of glomerulonephritis (5,6,7,8). These latter studies exploited the capacity of adenoviral or liposome-based vectors to transiently overexpress a soluble factor that is able to interfere with the progression of murine models of rapidly developing glomerulonephritis. Importantly, an alternative to relatively inefficient transduction of the kidney parenchyma is intramuscular administration of the vector, which allows the therapeutic factor to be secreted from this extrarenal source and thus to be available to the glomeruli where the phenotypic improvement is expected (7). Furthermore, to increase the half-life of the circulating factor, genetic modifications of the transgene can be introduced (7). Although the murine models of glomerulonephritis that have been used to validate gene transfer as a potential therapeutic approach have little clinical relevance, these reports have highlighted the specific roles of inflammatory and vascular mediators [such as transforming growth factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}), atrial natriuretic peptide, and lipoxins] in the establishment and maintenance of pathologic glomerular states.

In vivo or ex vivo delivery of genes to the kidney has been well described (9). Gene delivery vehicles include (1) viral vectors derived from infectious but nonreplicating viruses, (2) nonviral vectors derived from liposome-based chemical structures, and (3) genetically modified cells that are administered to the animals, possibly with prior selection. The latter vehicles are not discussed here, but recent studies describe this approach (10, 11).

The purpose of using viral vectors is to retain their infectivity potential, but with significant attenuation of their replication potential. These results are obtained by deleting essential viral genes from the wild-type genome and inserting the therapeutic gene(s). The transgene can be expressed under an independent constitutive, tissue-specific, or regulatable promoter, which adds considerable flexibility. In many instances, more than one transgene can be included (expressed independently or linked by an internal ribosomal entry site sequence). Antisense mRNA can also be generated after cloning of the transgene, in reverse orientation, downstream of the promoter.

Retroviral vectors require the target cell to divide after transduction. The remaining viral motifs and the presence of the reverse transcriptase and integrase peptides within the recombinant vector particle allow stable integration into host chromosomes, with subsequent expression of the transgene. Insulators can even be cloned on both sides of the transgene to reduce chromosomal interference at the integration locus (12), resulting in long-lasting transgene expression in vivo. Because division of the target cells is required for efficient retroviral transduction and because the mature kidney has a low mitotic index, this vector has not been popular to achieve direct gene transfer in the kidney. Even during folic acid-induced tubular regeneration, retrovirus-mediated transduction was poor and strictly localized to the site of administration (1).

Adenoviral vectors have opposite characteristics, because they can infect quiescent cells and the recombinant genome remains extrachromosomal. However, because of the complexity of the wild-type viral genome, deletion of the essential viral genes is only partial in the first generations of recombinant adenoviral vectors. This results in the expression of viral epitopes in the genetically modified organs, with subsequent cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation and rapid elimination of the transduced cells. Importantly, in immunodeficient mice, transgene expression persists longer in the liver after a single intraportal administration (13), suggesting that, although the foreign DNA remains external to the host genome, it displays remarkable stability, at least in murine liver. In addition to these molecular features, adenoviral binding and internalization require specific receptors and co-receptors on the target cell surface (14, 15). Because their distribution and density may not be optimal, adenoviral vectors often require high multiplicities of infection, i.e., high concentrations of virions per target cell, to obtain significant transduction. This is an important point to consider, because the adenoviral particle itself produces toxic effects by disturbing cellular integrity and triggering coagulation/complement disorders when administered in vivo at high concentrations (16). However, several initial studies have documented limited transduction of rat kidney after both intrarenal and retrograde delivery (2, 17). The combination of cold incubation and administration of a vasoactive drug with the adenoviral vector allows retargeting of the transduction from cortical to medullary compartments (17). A significant improvement in transduction could be obtained with isolated perfusion of pig kidney for at least 2 h with a preservative solution containing the recombinant adenovirus. This resulted in transduction of a reporter gene in approximately 85% of the glomeruli but not in tubular epithelial cells (18).

Although adenoviral vectors in their current design exhibit too many limitations, such as the requirement for high-titer stocks for transient and limited transduction of renal tissue, the refinement of adenoviral vectors may resolve these difficulties. Recent improvements include the modification of adenoviral tropism (19, 20) and the generation of recombinant adenovirus with complete deletion of all viral open reading frames (21). Another approach is to generate in vitro an adenovirus-polylysine-DNA complex that relies on adenovirus inactivation and the preserved ability of the viral particle to disrupt endocytic vesicles in the target cells. This complex resulted in transduction of proximal tubular epithelial cells when perfused into isolated human kidneys (22).

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a parvovirus that has recently emerged as a particularly attractive vector because it lacks in vivo toxicity and has the ability to sustain long-term transduction of skeletal myofibers, neurons, and retina (for review, see reference (23). Several groups have reported preclinical data for nonhuman primates (24, 25) and, more recently, for patients with hemophilia (26), suggesting that AAV is indicated when a therapeutic protein is required systemically. Despite the increasing use of AAV vectors in various organs and disease models, only one report described in vivo AAV delivery by renal intraparenchymal injection in mice, which was associated with limited transduction (for at least 3 mo) in tubule epithelial cells surrounding the injection site (27). However, in a murine model of a lysosomal storage disease, an important result was obtained after neonatal gene transfer using an AAV vector, showing that transgene cDNA and {beta}-glucuronidase activity persisted for at least 16 wk in multiple organs, including kidney (28). This result suggests that, at least at the mouse neonatal stage, one or several renal compartments are susceptible to long-term AAV transduction. Whether recombinant AAV actually represents a relevant alternative to adenovirus for gene transfer in the kidney remains to be explored in a more comprehensive manner.

The same remark can be made regarding the recently developed lentiviral vectors, with which safety is significantly improved because (1) they can be derived from several different species, (2) the majority of the original viral open reading frames are removed, and (3) the original envelope protein is deleted and recombinant particles can be pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitis virus envelope G protein. Although lentiviral vectors have recently exhibited success in vivo in murine hepatocytes, central nervous system, and lung, there is no evidence that the kidney would also be a potential target. In conclusion, efficient and clinically relevant vectors for in situ gene transfer in the kidney still need to be developed and tested using animal models, to improve transduction and limit immunologic side effects.

A possible alternative for in situ gene therapy of renal diseases involves delivery of the therapeutic protein from an extrarenal site to the renal compartments. Mice with spontaneous or induced hypertension were treated using adenoviral vectors containing kallistatin cDNA (29) or kallikrein cDNA (30, 31). The vectors were administered via a peripheral vein, with subsequent partial and transient phenotypic correction. Atrial natriuretic peptide cDNA was also expressed from an adenoviral vector and attenuated gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats (5). Renal pathologic features observed in lysosomal storage diseases were improved after intravenous delivery of recombinant adenovirus containing the {beta}-glucuronidase (32) and {alpha}-galactosidase (33) genes, in the mucopolysaccharidosis type VII and Fabry mouse models, respectively. In all of these reports, the biologic effects were likely obtained through transduction of the easily accessible liver, which acted as a source for the therapeutic protein.

Intraperitoneal administration of a recombinant adenovirus encoding the human erythropoietin (Epo) gene transiently improved renal anemia in DBA/2FG-pcy mice with chronic renal failure (34). Importantly, long-term regulated expression of the murine Epo gene was achieved after a single intramuscular injection of recombinant AAV containing Epo cDNA under the control of a tetracycline-inducible system (35).

A special comment should be made regarding the hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ) liposome vector. It is considered a chimeric vector, consisting of a lipid mixture associated with the inactivated Sendai virus. The viral epitopes provide effective ways to bind to the ubiquitously distributed HVJ receptors and to fuse with the lipid bilayer at the cell surface and in intracytoplasmic vesicles (36). In addition, high-mobility group 1 protein (a nonhistone chromosomal protein) is complexed to the foreign DNA before in vitro HVJ liposome assembly, to facilitate nuclear translocation (37). HVJ liposome vectors have been relatively well evaluated for therapeutic approaches to experimental renal diseases. Glomerulosclerosis is suspected to be triggered by dysregulation of various growth factors and cytokines in the kidney, including TGF-{beta}, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and endothelin-1 (38). In particular, TGF-{beta} plays a critical role in the progression of glomerulosclerosis, and inhibition of TGF-{beta} by the proteoglycan decorin suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in the anti-Thy-1 model of experimental glomerulonephritis (6). Decorin cDNA, in HVJ liposomes, was injected into the skeletal muscle, which acted as an external source of decorin after transduction. That study provided immunofluorescence evidence of the circulating decorin in the glomeruli, in association with reduced extracellular matrix accumulation and proteinuria. Those results were in agreement with previous reports that demonstrated protection against scarring in experimental kidney disease after inhibition of TGF-{beta} by antisense oligonucleotides (39) or injection of recombinant decorin and anti-TGF-{beta} antibodies (40). This approach had the advantage of being highly relevant for the clinical development of a novel treatment for fibrotic diseases caused by TGF-{beta}1. More recently, a similar approach was used to create an efficient inhibitor with the capacity to block the binding of TGF-{beta} to type II receptors, thus preventing subsequent signal transduction (7). A cDNA construct encoding chimeric TGF{beta}RII/Fc (consisting of the extracellular portion of the TGF-{beta} type II receptor fused to an Ig heavy-chain Fc fragment) was placed in HVJ liposomes and injected into the gluteal muscles of nephritic rats. Genetically modified muscle was able to sustain secretion of the TGF{beta}RII/Fc protein, with concomitant suppression of glomerular TGF-{beta} production and reduction of extracellular matrix accumulation.

HVJ liposomes were also used to directly transduce rat glomeruli for approximately 7 d (41). The renin and angiotensinogen genes were expressed in glomeruli, to investigate the local effects of angiotensin II upregulation. Thirty percent of the glomeruli were transduced after 3 d, with simultaneous extracellular matrix expansion of the mesangial area. That study is in agreement with a more recent one in which HVJ-mediated transduction of rat kidneys with 15-lipoxygenase cDNA suppressed inflammation and preserved function in passive and accelerated anti-glomerular basement membrane-induced nephritis models (8). On the basis of these reports and others, HVJ liposomes seem to be a fairly powerful tool for transient expression of foreign genes, for therapeutic intervention or investigation of renal pathophysiologic processes.

For a better understanding of the difficulties presented by the use of viral vectors in the kidney, a few comments regarding the recent development of nonviral vectors are necessary. An important report recently illustrated the requirement for glomerular filtration for transduction of proximal tubular cells in rat kidneys after injection of nonviral DNA complexes into the renal artery (42). FITC-pLys-containing lipopolysaccharide complexes were used to detect DNA particles in vivo. This elegant method established that nonviral vectors are able to transduce proximal tubular cells only when filtered through the glomerular basement membrane. Furthermore, DNA complexes that do not undergo glomerular filtration remain unable to transduce the nephron via the peritubular capillaries. It is tempting to extend these findings by suggesting a model in which DNA complexes that have reached the urinary space are actively reabsorbed in the proximal tubules, which would favor random transduction events. In other words, one simple strategy to genetically modify the nephron would be to establish the physicochemical properties of DNA complexes for optimal glomerular filtration and subsequent tubular reabsorption. A paradox could be that the proximal nephron is an appropriate target for nonviral vector-mediated gene transfer [or transduction of small (<70-nm) viral particles, such as AAV]. Indeed, glomerular filtration represents the first concentration step leading to high vector loads at the proximal tubule level, where reabsorptive activity is naturally important. Therefore, vector uptake may be optimal at this level. This hypothesis would be in agreement with several studies that unambiguously demonstrated that renal artery administration or intra-renal pelvic infusion of cationic lipid-based vectors encoding a reporter gene resulted in transient transduction of the tubules but not the glomerular, vascular, or interstitial compartments of the kidney (43, 44). An important study demonstrated that retrograde injection of cationic liposomes complexed with carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) cDNA into the renal pelvis of CAII-deficient mice resulted in expression of CAII in the kidney for up to 1 mo. Furthermore, after gene transfer, CAII-deficient mice regained the ability to acidify urine after oral administration of ammonium chloride (45). A careful immunohistochemical evaluation using an anti-CAII antibody demonstrated that the CAII gene was expressed only in tubular cells of the outer medulla and corticomedullary junction.

Gene transfer into the kidney has presented novel avenues for nephrologists interested in the pathophysiologic processes of renal diseases. It has also triggered dreams of new therapeutic approaches. Obviously, there are still major obstacles to therapeutic applications, and development of a large database on vectors and transfer methods in animal models remains a priority. The most recently developed viral vectors, including recombinant AAV and lentiviruses, have not yet been evaluated in the kidney. On the basis of their characteristics in other tissues, these vectors may allow transduction of quiescent renal cells and may provide long-term expression of therapeutic genes.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mark Haskins for critically reading the manuscript. Dr. Favre is supported in part by the Association Nantaise pour la The' rapie Génique.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Bosch RJ, Woolf AS, Fine LG: Gene transfer into the mammalian kidney: Direct retrovirus transduction of regenerating tubular epithelial cells. Exp Nephrol 1:49 -54, 1993[Medline]
  2. Moullier P, Friedlander G, Calise D, Ronco P, Perricaudet M, Ferry N: Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer to renal tubular cells in vivo.Kidney Int 45:1220 -1225, 1994[Medline]
  3. Kitamura M: Transfer of exogenous genes into the kidney. Exp Nephrol 2:313 -317, 1994[Medline]
  4. Kitamura M, Taylor S, Unwin R, Burton S, Shimizu F, Fine LG: Gene transfer into rat renal glomerulus via a mesangial cell vector: Site-specific delivery, in situ amplification, and sustained expression of an exogenous gene in vivo. J Clin Invest94 : 497-505,1994
  5. Murakami H, Yayama K, Chao J, Chao L: Atrial natriuretic peptide gene delivery attenuates gentamycin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1376 -1384, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Isaka Y, Brees DK, Ikegaya K, Kaneda Y, Imai E, Noble NA, Border WA: Gene therapy by skeletal muscle expression of decorin prevents fibrotic disease in rat kidney. Nat Med2 : 418-423,1996[Medline]
  7. Isaka Y, Akagi Y, Ando Y, Tsujie M, Sudo T, Ohno N, Border WA, Noble NA, Kaneda Y, Hori M, Imai E: Gene therapy by transforming growth factor-beta receptor-IgG Fc chimera suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 55: 465-475,1999[Medline]
  8. Munger KA, Montero A, Fukunaga M, Uda S, Yura T, Imai E, Kaneda Y, Valdivielso JM, Badr KF: Transfection of rat kidney with human 15-lipoxygenase suppresses inflammation and preserves function in experimental glomerulonephritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA96 : 13375-13380,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kone BC: How will gene therapy apply to the kidney in the 21st century? Semin Nephrol 20:47 -59, 2000[Medline]
  10. Kitamura M: Adoptive transfer of nuclear factor-kappaB-inactive macrophages to the glomerulus. Kidney Int57 : 709-716,2000[Medline]
  11. Kluth DC, Erwig LP, Pearce WP, Rees AJ: Gene transfer into inflamed glomeruli using macrophages transfected with adenovirus. Gene Ther 7: 263-270,2000[Medline]
  12. Rivella S, Sadelain M: Genetic treatment of severe hemoglobinopathies: The combat against transgene variegation and transgene silencing. Semin Hematol 35:112 -125, 1998[Medline]
  13. Yang Y, Wilson JM: Clearance of adenovirus-infected hepatocytes by MHC class I-restricted CD4+ CTLs in vivo. J Immunol 155:2564 -2570, 1995[Abstract]
  14. Hong SS, Karayan L, Tournier J, Curiel DT, Boulanger PA: Adenovirus type 5 fiber knob binds to MHC class I alpha2 domain at the surface of human epithelial and B lymphoblastoid cells. EMBO J16 : 2294-2306,1997[Medline]
  15. Bergelson JM, Krithivas A, Celi L, Droguett G, Horwitz MS, Wickham T, Crowell RL, Finberg RW: The murine CAR homolog is a receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses. J Virol72 : 415-419,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nunes FA, Furth EE, Wilson JM, Raper SE: Gene transfer into the liver of nonhuman primates with E1-deleted recombinant adenoviral vectors: Safety of readministration. Hum Gene Ther10 : 2515-2526,1999[Medline]
  17. Zhu G, Nicolson AG, Cowley BD, Rosen S, Sukhatme VP: In vivo adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into normal and cystic rat kidneys. Gene Ther 3:298 -304, 1996[Medline]
  18. Heikkila P, Parpala T, Lukkarinen O, Weber M, Tryggvason K: Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into kidney glomeruli using an ex vivo and in vivo kidney perfusion system: First steps towards gene therapy of Alport syndrome. Gene Ther3 : 21-27,1996[Medline]
  19. Douglas JT, Rogers BE, Rosenfeld ME, Michael SI, Feng M, Curiel DT: Targeted gene delivery by tropism-modified adenoviral vectors. Nat Biotechnol 14:1574 -1578, 1996[Medline]
  20. Krasnykh VN, Mikheeva GV, Douglas JT, Curiel DT: Generation of recombinant adenovirus vectors with modified fibers for altering viral tropism. J Virol 70:6839 -6846, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kochanek S, Clemens PR, Mitani K, Chen HH, Chan S, Caskey CT: A new adenoviral vector: Replacement of all viral coding sequences with 28 kb of DNA independently expressing both full-length dystrophin and beta-galactosidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5731 -5736, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Zeigler ST, Kerby JD, Curiel DT, Diethelm AG, Thompson JA: Molecular conjugate-mediated gene transfer into isolated human kidneys. Transplantation 61:812 -817, 1996[Medline]
  23. Snyder RO: Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery. J Gene Med 1:166 -175, 1999[Medline]
  24. Zhou S, Murphy JE, Escobedo JA, Dwarki VJ: Adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery of erythropoietin leads to sustained elevation of hematocrit in nonhuman primates. Gene Ther5 : 665-670,1998[Medline]
  25. Ye X, Rivera VM, Zoltick P, Cerasoli F Jr, Schnell MA, Gao G, Hughes JV, Gilman M, Wilson JM: Regulated delivery of therapeutic proteins after in vivo somatic cell gene transfer. Science (Washington DC) 283:88 -91, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kay MA, Manno CS, Ragni MV, Larson PJ, Couto LB, McClelland A, Glader B, Chew AJ, Tai SJ, Herzog RW, Arruda V, Johnson F, Scallen C, Skarsgard E, Flake AW, High KA: Evidence for gene transfer and expression of factor IX in haemophilia B patients treated with an AAV vector. Nat Genet 24:257 -261, 2000[Medline]
  27. Lipkowitz MS, Hanss B, Tulchin N, Wilson PD, Langer JC, Ross MD, Kurtzman GJ, Klotman PE, Klotman ME: Transduction of renal cells in vitro and in vivo by adeno-associated virus gene therapy vectors. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1908 -1915, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Daly TM, Vogler C, Levy B, Haskins ME, Sands MS: Neonatal gene transfer leads to widespread correction of pathology in a murine model of lysosomal storage disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA96 : 2296-2300,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Chen LM, Chao L, Chao J: Adenovirus-mediated delivery of human kallistatin gene reduces blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hum Gene Ther 8:341 -347, 1997[Medline]
  30. Dobrzynski E, Yoshida H, Chao J, Chao L: Adenovirus-mediated kallikrein gene delivery attenuates hypertension and protects against renal injury in deoxycorticosterone-salt rats. Immunopharmacology 44:57 -65, 1999[Medline]
  31. Jin L, Zhang JJ, Chao L, Chao J: Gene therapy in hypertension: Adenovirus-mediated kallikrein gene delivery in hypertensive rats. Hum Gene Ther 8:1753 -1761, 1997[Medline]
  32. Stein CS, Ghodsi A, Derksen T, Davidson BL: Systemic and central nervous system correction of lysosomal storage in mucopolysaccharidosis type VII mice. J Virol 73:3424 -3429, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ziegler RJ, Yew NS, Li C, Cherry M, Berthelette P, Romanczuk H, Ioannou YA, Zeidner KM, Desnick RJ, Cheng SH: Correction of enzymatic and lysosomal storage defects in Fabry mice by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther 10:1667 -1682, 1999[Medline]
  34. Osada S, Ebihara I, Setoguchi Y, Takahashi H, Tomino Y, Koide H: Gene therapy for renal anemia in mice with polycystic kidney using an adenovirus vector encoding the human erythropoietin gene. Kidney Int 55:1234 -1240, 1999[Medline]
  35. Bohl D, Salvetti A, Moullier P, Heard JM: Control of erythropoietin delivery by doxycyclin in mice after intramuscular injection of adeno-associated vector. Blood92 : 1512-1517,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Isaka Y, Akagi Y, Kaneda Y, Imai E: The HVJ liposome method. Exp Nephrol 6:144 -147, 1998[Medline]
  37. Bustin M, Lehn DA, Landsman D: Structural features of the HMG chromosomal protein HMG-1 and its accumulation in the cell nucleus. J Biol Chem 260:10361 -10368, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Johnson RJ: Cytokines, growth factors and renal injury: Where do we go now? Kidney Int Suppl 63:S2 -S6, 1997[Medline]
  39. Akagi Y, Isaka Y, Arai M, Kaneko T, Takenaka M, Moriyama T, Kaneda Y, Ando A, Orita Y, Kamada T, Ueda N, Imai E: Inhibition of TGF-{beta}1 expression by antisense oligonucleotides suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 50: 148-155,1996[Medline]
  40. Border WA, Noble NA, Yamamoto T, Harper JR, Yamaguchi YU, Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E: Natural inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta protects against scarring in experimental kidney disease. Nature (Lond) 360:361 -364, 1992[Medline]
  41. Arai M, Wada A, Isaka Y, Akagi Y, Sugiura T, Miyazaki M, Moriyama T, Kaneda Y, Naruse K, Naruse M: In vivo transfection of genes for renin and angiotensinogen into the glomerular cells induced phenotypic change of the mesangial cells and glomerular sclerosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 206:525 -532, 1995[Medline]
  42. Foglieni C, Bragonzi A, Cortese M, Cantu L, Boletta A, Chiossone I, Soria MR, Monaco L: Glomerular filtration is required for transfection of proximal tubular cells in the rat kidney following injection of DNA complexes into the renal artery. Gene Ther7 : 279-285,2000[Medline]
  43. Lien YH, Lai LW: Liposome-mediated gene transfer into the tubules. Exp Nephrol 5:132 -136, 1997[Medline]
  44. Lai LW, Moeckel GW, Lien YH: Kidney-targeted liposome-mediated gene transfer in mice. Gene Ther 4:426 -431, 1997[Medline]
  45. Lai LW, Chan DM, Erickson RP, Hsu SJ, Lien YH: Correction of renal tubular acidosis in carbonic anhydrase II-deficient mice with gene therapy. J Clin Invest 101:1320 -1325, 1998[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FAVRE, D.
Right arrow Articles by MOULLIER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FAVRE, D.
Right arrow Articles by MOULLIER, P.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP