Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KIEPE, D.
Right arrow Articles by TÖNSHOFF, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KIEPE, D.
Right arrow Articles by TÖNSHOFF, B.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:2400-2410, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

Intact IGF-Binding Protein-4 and -5 and Their Respective Fragments Isolated from Chronic Renal Failure Serum Differentially Modulate IGF-I Actions in Cultured Growth Plate Chondrocytes

DANIELA KIEPE*, DENNIS L. ANDRESS{dagger}, SUBBURAMAN MOHAN{ddagger}, LUDGER STÄNDKER§, TIM ULINSKI*, RAINER HIMMELE*, OTTO MEHLS* and BURKHARD TÖNSHOFF*

* Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
{dagger} Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
{ddagger} J. L. Pettis Veterans Administration Medical Center and Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
§ Lower Saxony Institute for Peptide Research, Hannover, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr. Burkhard Tönshoff, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 150, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49-6221-562311; Fax: 49-6221-564203; E-mail: Burkhard_Toenshoff{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Impairment of longitudinal growth among children with chronic renal failure (CRF) may be partly attributable to the inhibition of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) activity by an excess amount of high-affinity IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP). Elevated levels of immunoreactive IGFBP-4 in CRF serum are inversely correlated with the standardized heights of these children, whereas levels of IGFBP-5, which circulates mainly as proteolyzed fragments, are positively correlated with growth parameters. To delineate the respective effects of these IGFBP on growth cartilage, the biologic effects of intact and fragmented forms of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on rat growth plate chondrocytes in primary cultures were characterized. Intact IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 and the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-51-169 were recombinant proteins; the carboxy-terminal fragments IGFBP-5144-252 and IGFBP-4136-237 and the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122 were purified to homogeneity from CRF hemofiltrates. Intact IGFBP-4 and, to a lesser extent, IGFBP-41-122 inhibited IGF-I-induced cell proliferation. In contrast, intact IGFBP-5 was stimulatory in the absence or presence of exogenous IGF-I, whereas the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-51-169 was inhibitory. Studies on the mechanism by which IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 exert opposite effects on chondrocyte proliferation demonstrated that intact IGFBP-4 prevented the binding of 125I-IGF-I to chondrocytes, whereas intact IGFBP-5 enhanced ligand binding and was able to bind specifically to the cell membrane. These data suggest that intact IGFBP-4 and, to a lesser extent, IGFBP-41-122 act exclusively as growth-inhibitory binding proteins in the growth cartilage. IGFBP-5, however, can either stimulate (if it remains intact) or inhibit (if amino-terminal forms predominate) IGF-I-stimulated chondrocyte proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Impairment of longitudinal growth is a severe secondary complication of chronic renal failure (CRF) in childhood, which results, in part, from an altered growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis controlling growth plate cartilage proliferation (1,2). Although immunoreactive GH and IGF levels are usually not decreased in CRF serum, the bioactivity of IGF is reduced because of excess amounts of circulating, high-affinity, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP), which decrease or prevent IGF binding to its signaling receptor (1,2,3,4,5).

Recently, we (6) and others (7,8) demonstrated that IGFBP-4 contributes to the increased IGF-binding capacity of uremic serum. Serum levels of immunoreactive IGFBP-4 are increased fourfold in children and adults with CRF, compared with control values; this increase is attributable to elevated levels of both intact and fragmented IGFBP-4 (6,7,8). On a molar basis, serum IGFBP-4 is the second most abundant IGFBP in the serum of children with preterminal CRF (6). However, immunoreactive IGFBP-5 levels in CRF serum are normal, and the majority of IGFBP-5 is fragmented (6,7). Correlation analyses of growth parameters in clinical studies of children with CRF demonstrated that immunoreactive IGFBP-4 levels were inversely correlated with standardized height, consistent with the role of IGFBP-4 as another inhibitor of the biologic action of IGF on growth plate cartilage (6). However, serum IGFBP-5 levels were positively correlated with both standardized height and height velocity among children with CRF, consistent with a potential stimulatory role of this IGFBP on longitudinal growth (6,7).

Although it seems, on the basis of data from the clinical studies, that IGFBP-4 and -5 may have contrasting effects on longitudinal growth among uremic children, in vitro studies have not been conducted to delineate the respective roles of IGFBP-4 and -5 in normal cartilage growth. Studies with cultured normal osteoblasts (9) and other cells (10,11,12), however, have demonstrated that IGFBP-4 acts exclusively as an inhibitor of IGF action and that IGFBP-5 can either potentiate IGF-stimulated effects (12,13,14,15,16) or stimulate osteoblast activity via an IGF-independent pathway (13,16,17). Moreover, IGFBP-5 may also inhibit IGF action in other cell types, depending on experimental conditions (18,19).

Because of the potential importance of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 in cartilage physiologic processes, the aim of this study was to investigate the proliferative effects of intact and fragmented forms of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on cultured growth plate chondrocytes, which express the type I IGF receptor (IGFIR) (20). Intact recombinant IGFBP-4 (21) and IGFBP-5 (22), a recombinant amino-terminal IGFBP-5 fragment (15), and defined amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal IGFBP-4 and -5 fragments isolated from hemofiltrates from patients with end-stage renal disease (23,24) were investigated. The bioactivity of these IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 fragments from end-stage renal disease serum, which might play a role in the growth failure of children with CRF, had not previously been directly tested. Furthermore, we sought to identify the mechanisms by which IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 exert their differential biologic effects on growth plate chondrocytes. Our results demonstrate that chondrocyte growth depends on the contrasting functions of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5, with respect to their cell surface binding capacities and their subsequent interactions with IGF-I.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
Recombinant IGFBP-41-237 was produced in Escherichia coli and purified by using established procedures (21). Intact human recombinant IGFBP-5 and carboxy-truncated IGFBP-51-169 were expressed in baculovirus (15,22) and were purified by IGF affinity chromatography and reverse-phase HPLC, as described previously (15).

The amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122, the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-4136-237, and the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-5144-252 were purified from hemofiltrates from patients with end-stage renal failure, as follows. Isolation of IGFBP-4 and -5 fragments was guided by immunoblot screening of fractions of a peptide library established from 10,000 L of hemofiltrates obtained from patients with CRF, as described previously (23,24). In brief, immediately after blood filtration using ultrafilters with a specified cutoff of 20 kD, the filtrate was routinely chilled to 4°C and adjusted to pH 3, to prevent bacterial growth and proteolysis. For the first separation step, the ultrafiltrate was applied to a strong cation-exchange column [Fractogel TSK SP 650(M); Merck, Darmstadt, Germany] and peptides were eluted batchwise by means of a pH gradient. Each derived pH-pool eluate was further separated by reverse-phase chromatography, resulting in a total of 350 peptide-containing fractions, which were analyzed for the presence of naturally occurring IGFBP-4 and -5 fragments by Western blotting (23,24). Immunoreactive IGFBP fractions were further purified to homogeneity by analytical cation-exchange and reverse-phase chromatography and were analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry and conventional sequence analysis, as described previously (23,24).

Recombinant human IGF-I and IGF-II were purchased from Bachem (Heidelberg, Germany); des(1-3)-IGF-I was obtained from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia). [3H]Thymidine (25 Ci/mmol) and 125I-IGF-I (>2000 Ci/mmol protein) were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Buckinghamshire, UK). Radioiodination of the IGFBP (20 to 100 µCi/µg protein) was performed by using a standard chloramine T method. Two micrograms of each peptide were dissolved in 75 µl of 0.25 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.5), and Na125I (0.2 mCi; Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany) and 10 µl of chloramine T (2.5 mg/ml in phosphate buffer) were added. After incubation for 60 s, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 µl of Na2S2O5 (3.2 mg/ml in phosphate buffer). Each radiolabeled peptide was purified on Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters-Millipore, Eschborn, Germany). After application of the iodinated sample, each cartridge was rinsed with 5 ml of 10 mM HCl, to remove unbound material. Elution was performed by using 1 ml of 80% acetonitrile in 10 mM HCl. The homogeneity and specific activities of the radiolabeled peptides were controlled on a 322 HPLC system (Kontron, Neufahrn, Germany) by separation on an analytical reverse-phase C18 column using a linear acetonitrile gradient, with online detection of the absorbance at 214 nm and of the radioactivity using a {gamma}-measuring cell (J-1000; Berthold, Wildbad, Germany).

Standard low-gel temperature agarose was purchased from BioRad (Hercules, CA); fetal calf serum (FCS), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Hepes, penicillin-streptomycin, Ham's F-12 medium, and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) were obtained from Seromed Biochrom KG (Berlin, Germany). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (Deisenhofen, Germany). Clostridium collagenase (EC 3.4.24.3), DNase I (EC 3.1.21.1), and trypan blue were from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). AmpliTaq Gold, murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, and oligo(dT)16 were obtained from Perkin-Elmer (Weiterstadt, Germany). The base pair ladder was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia (Freiburg, Germany), and the 18S rRNA primer pair and competimers were purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX).

Cell Cultures
Epiphyseal chondrocytes from 60- to 80-g Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Kieslegg, Germany) were isolated and cultured as described previously (25,26,27). Pooled growth plates from four to eight animals were digested with clostridial collagenase (0.12%, wt/vol) and bacterial DNase (0.02%, wt/vol) in F-12 medium. Viability, which was determined after isolation and at the end of each experiment by using the trypan blue exclusion technique, always exceeded 90%. Dissociated cells were counted by using a Neubauer chamber (Scheik, Hofheim, Germany).

Cells were cultured in monolayers in 96-well plates for proliferation assays and in 24-well plates (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) for binding studies, as described previously (25,27,28). F-12 medium/DMEM (1:1) contained a nominal calcium concentration of 1.2 mM, and the medium was supplemented with 10 mM Hepes, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% FCS. In previous studies using the same culture system, we demonstrated that the majority of cells after the first passage expressed typical markers for proliferative growth plate chondrocytes. Peptide hormones were dissolved in PBS and added every day unless indicated otherwise.

For agarose-stabilized suspension cultures, cells were cultured in agarose in 35-mm dishes (Nunc), as described previously (25,26,27,28). One milliliter of F-12 medium/DMEM containing 0.2% BSA, 0.1% FCS, and hormones or solvents as indicated was added to the cell suspension (40,000 cells/ml in 0.5% low-gel temperature agarose).

The medium was changed every second day, and cells were cultured for 2 wk. Cultures were screened for clusters of more than three cells. No such clusters were observed at the start of culture in any experiment. Suspension cultures were terminated, after 12 d, by fixation in 4% buffered formaldehyde and methanol. Colonies were counted under the microscope, in 100 squares (2-mm grid) for each dish. A cell colony was defined as a cluster of three or more cells with matrix stained by Alcian blue, as described previously (25,27,28).

[3H]Thymidine Assays
The incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA was determined, in 96-well plate cultures, as the uptake of radioactivity in TCA-precipitable material, as described previously (25,28). Before experiments, cells were synchronized in the cell cycle by starving in serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM for 24 h. The medium was changed to F-12 medium/DMEM with 0.2% BSA, and hormones or solvents were added, as indicated, for 48 h. For the last 4 h, cultures were coincubated with 2 µCi of [3H]thymidine. In the preincubation experiments, cells were exposed to the respective IGFBP at 37°C for the indicated times and were washed three times with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM, followed by incubation with IGF-I for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were rinsed twice with PBS and extracted with sodium hydroxide (1 M). Before counting, the extract was mixed with scintillation fluid.

Effects of IGFBP on 125I-IGF-I Binding to Chondrocytes in Monolayer Cultures
Binding studies were performed according to the method described by Andress and Birnbaum (13). Briefly, confluent chondrocytes were rinsed twice with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM containing 1% BSA (pH 7.4). In the coincubation experiments, various concentrations of IGFBP were added and incubated with 125I-IGF-I (10,000 cpm), in the absence or presence of unlabeled IGF-I (250 ng/ml), at 4°C for 3 h. In the preincubation experiments, cultures were incubated with the respective IGFBP at 37°C for 3 h, followed by intensive washing with cold serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM containing 1% BSA (pH 7.4) and incubation with 125I-IGF-I (10,000 cpm), in the absence or presence of unlabeled IGF-I (250 ng/ml), at 4°C for 3 h. The labeled medium was discarded, and the cells were rinsed five times with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM and extracted with sodium hydroxide. Levels of cell surface-associated 125I-IGF-I were determined by counting the cell lysates in a {gamma}-counter. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between binding in the absence and in the presence of excess unlabeled IGF-I (250 ng/ml). Nonspecific binding was consistently <7%.

125I-IGFBP Binding to Chondrocytes
For binding studies, confluent cells were rinsed twice with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM, as described previously (15). Each well was incubated with 250 µl of medium and the respective 125I-IGFBP (80,000 cpm) or vehicle, in the absence or presence of varying concentrations of the respective unlabeled IGFBP, at 4°C for 3 h. At the end of the incubation period, the labeled medium was discarded, and the cells were rinsed five times with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM. 125I-IGFBP bound to cells was extracted with lysis buffer and counted as described previously (15).

For binding studies with suspended cells, chondrocytes were trypsinized and washed once with PBS and serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM. The cell number was adjusted to 320,000 cells/200 µl, as described previously (29). The respective unlabeled IGFBP in serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM or vehicle was added, and the cells were incubated with 125I-IGFBP (80,000 cpm) or vehicle at 4°C for 3 h. After the incubation period, the samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm at 4°C for 1 min. The supernatant was carefully removed, and the cells were washed twice with serum-free F-12 medium/DMEM. The cell pellets were transferred into scintillation vials and counted. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between binding in the absence and in the presence of excess unlabeled IGFBP (1000 ng/ml).

Reverse Transcription-PCR
Chondrocytes were grown in monolayers until subconfluent. Before the beginning of the experiments, cells were synchronized by maintenance under serum-free conditions for 12 h. The medium was changed, and IGF-I and intact IGFBP-5 (at the indicated concentrations) were added for 24 h. Total RNA from cultured cells was isolated by the RNeasy method (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the instructions provided by the manufacturer, and was quantified by measurement of the OD at 260 nm or by densitometric comparison with a set of standards (GS 700 imaging densitometer; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Multiplex reverse transcription-PCR for the determination of IGFIR mRNA abundance was performed according to the user manual provided by Perkin-Elmer. Reverse transcription and PCR primers (obtained from MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) were deduced from rat IGFIR sequences (30). One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using oligo(dT)/hexamer primers in a ratio of 10:1. After cDNA synthesis, multiplex PCR amplification was performed by using the cDNA template with the target primer pair (IGFIR F1, 5'-AGCCCATGTGTGAGAAGACC-3'; R2, 5'-CGCACACGCCTTTGTAGTAG-3') and a mixture of 18S rRNA primers/competimers (Ambion), for single-tube coamplification of the specific product and its 18S rRNA standard. The amplification profile consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, after an initial 10-min preheating at 94°C for enzyme activation, in a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR System 2400. The amplified products (30 cycles, 215 bp for IGFIR and 488 bp for 18S rRNA) were detected by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and were observed by ethidium bromide staining and ultraviolet transillumination. Control reactions, which were performed by omitting reverse transcriptase or template RNA, demonstrated no reaction product. The cycle products were within the linear-logarithmic phase of the amplification curves. The OD of the PCR products were analyzed by using a commercially available computer program (Bio-1D, version 96; Vilber Lourmat, Marne-La-Vallee France). Results were normalized with respect to the density of the multiplexed 18S rRNA product.

Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All data were examined for normal and nongaussian distribution by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For comparisons among normally distributed groups, oneway ANOVA, followed by pairwise multiple comparisons (Student-Newman-Keuls method), was used. For non-normally distributed data, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by an allpairwise multiple comparison (Dunnett's method), was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of IGFBP-4 on Basal and IGF-Driven Growth Plate Chondrocyte Proliferation
The maximally effective concentration of IGF-I for colony formation in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures was 60 ng/ml (7.8 nM). The IGF-I-induced cell proliferation corresponded to approximately 50% of the maximal cell proliferation induced by incubation with 10% FCS (data not shown). In the absence of exogenous IGF, intact IGFBP-4 did not inhibit basal cell proliferation (Figure 1A); even high concentrations (100 nM) of IGFBP-4 were not inhibitory (data not shown). However, the IGF-stimulated colony formation was decreased when chondrocytes were exposed to intact IGFBP-4. Simultaneous exposure of cells to IGF-I and IGFBP-4 in equimolar concentrations (7.8 nM) reduced the IGF-I-driven proliferation by 75% (Figure 1A). IGFBP-4 had an negligible effect on the stimulation of proliferation associated with des (1,2,3)-IGF-I (Figure 1A), which has a > 100-fold reduced affinity for IGFBP-4 but a similar binding affinity for the IGFIR, compared with those of IGF-I (16). The stimulatory effect of des (1,2,3)-IGF-I on cell proliferation was 40% lower than that obtained with intact IGF-I. A comparable inhibitory effect of intact IGFBP-4 on IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis, as measured in [3H]thymidine incorporation assays, was observed (Table 1).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Effects of intact and fragmented insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) on basal and IGF-I-stimulated colony formation in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures. (A) Effects of intact IGFBP-4 (7.8 nM) on basal, IGF-I (7.8 nM)-induced, and des(1-3)-IGF-I (7.8 nM)-induced colony formation. (B) Effects of the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122 (7.8 nM). (C) Effects of the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-4136-237 (7.8 nM). After 12 d of incubation, the cultures were terminated by fixation in buffered formaldehyde (4%). The colonies were counted in 100 squares (2-mm grid), using an inverted light microscope. Values represent the mean ± SEM of eight dishes. Statistical analyses (with respect to endpoints) were performed by using ANOVA. *P < 0.05 versus control; #P < 0.05 versus IGF-I.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Effects of intact IGFBP-4, intact IGFBP-5, the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-5(1-169), and the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-5(144-252) on basal and IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis, as assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporationa
 

Because levels of both intact IGFBP-4 and low-molecular weight IGFBP-4 fragments are increased in CRF serum (6,7,8), it was also of interest to study the biologic effects of IGFBP-4 fragments on growth plate chondrocytes. Amino-terminal (positions 1-122) and carboxy-terminal (positions 136-237) IGFBP-4 fragments isolated from hemofiltrates from patients with end-stage renal disease were studied. IGFBP-41-122 did not modify colony formation in the absence of exogenous IGF-I but inhibited IGF-I-mediated cell proliferation by 25%; higher concentrations of IGFBP-41-122 did not exhibit stronger inhibitory effects (Figure 1B). In contrast, IGFBP-4136-237 did not modify basal or IGF-I-driven colony formation (Figure 1C).

Effects of IGFBP-5 on Basal and IGF-I-Driven Growth Plate Chondrocyte Proliferation
In contrast to IGFBP-4, exposure of growth plate chondrocytes to IGFBP-5 under identical experimental conditions increased cell proliferation, in the absence or presence of exogenous IGF-I. In the absence of exogenous IGF-I, incubation of cells with IGFBP-5 under serum-free conditions stimulated DNA synthesis ([3H]thymidine uptake) in a dose-dependent manner [IGFBP-5 (1 nM), 126 ± 7% of control value; IGFBP-5 (100 nM), 155 ± 5%; P < 0.05 versus control; IGF-I (7.8 nM), 155 ± 20%; P < 0.05 versus control]. Similarly, colony formation was stimulated threefold by IGFBP-5 (10 nM), compared with control values (results not shown). In the presence of IGF-I, IGFBP-5 clearly had a dose-dependent and additive effect on colony formation (Figure 2A); the combined administration of 7.8 nM IGF-I and 15.6 nM IGFBP-5 stimulated colony formation tenfold, compared with control values. However, coincubation of des (1-3)-IGF-I with IGFBP-5 did not potentiate des (1-3)-IGF-I-driven cell proliferation (Figure 2B) and DNA synthesis [IGF-I (7.8 nM), 140 ± 7.8% of control value; P < 0.05 versus control; IGFBP-5 (7.8 nM), 128 ± 5.9% of control value; des(1-3)-IGF-I plus IGFBP-5 (1:1), 137 ± 7.0% of control value; P < 0.05 versus control; des(1-3)-IGF-I plus IGFBP-5 (1:2), 128 ± 7.5% of control value]. These data indicate that the IGF-I-synergistic effect of IGFBP-5 in this cell culture system requires, at least in part, binding of the peptide to the binding protein.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Effects of intact IGFBP-5 on basal and IGF-I-stimulated colony formation in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures. (A) Effects of IGF-I (7.8 nM), intact IGFBP-5 (7.8 nM), and intact IGFBP-5 coincubated with IGF-I (in a 1:1 or 2:1 molar ratio) on colony formation. (B) Effects of des(1-3)-IGF-I (7.8 nM), intact IGFBP-5, and intact IGFBP-5 coincubated with des(1-3)-IGF-I (in a 1:1 or 2:1 molar ratio) on colony formation of chondrocytes in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures. For methods and statistical analyses, see the legend to Figure 1. Values represent the mean ± SEM of eight dishes. *P < 0.05 versus control; #P < 0.05 versus IGF-I; $P < 0.05 versus IGFBP-5; §P < 0.05 versus IGFBP-5 plus IGF-I (1:1).

 

To investigate whether the enhancing effect of IGFBP-5 on IGF-I-mediated DNA synthesis could be attributable to membrane association of IGFBP-5, rat growth plate chondrocytes were preincubated for 24 h with IGFBP-5 in the absence of IGF-I, followed by extensive washing. IGFBP-5 preexposure potentiated IGF-I-stimulated [3H]thymidine uptake (Figure 3A). A longer preincubation period (48 h) did not modify the potentiating effect of IGFBP-5 on IGF-I actions (results not shown). Preincubation with IGFBP-2 did not alter IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis under identical experimental conditions (Figure 3B).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Effects of preincubation with the indicated concentrations of IGFBP-5 (A) or IGFBP-2 (B) on IGF-I-driven [3H]thymidine incorporation. Cells were exposed to intact IGFBP-5 or IGFBP-2 for 24 h at 37°C, followed by three washes with serum-free F-12 medium/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), as described in the Materials and Methods section. Cells were then incubated with IGF-I for 24 h; for the last 4 h, 2 µCi of [3H]thymidine was added, for determination of [3H]thymidine incorporation. Statistical analyses were by ANOVA for six (A) or eight (B) parallel wells/group. *P < 0.05 versus control; #P < 0.05 versus preincubation without IGFBP-5.

 

Because most IGFBP-5 in CRF serum is fragmented (6,7), the biologic effects of specific IGFBP-5 fragments on chondrocyte proliferation were of interest. The amino-terminal recombinant fragment IGFBP-51-169 did not affect thymidine incorporation or cell proliferation in the absence of exogenous IGF-I (Table 1 and Figure 4A), even at high concentrations (1 µM) (results not shown). However, IGF-I-mediated DNA synthesis and cell proliferation were reduced by 50% in the presence of IGFBP-51-169; higher concentrations did not exhibit stronger inhibitory effects. In contrast, the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-5144-252 did not modify basal or IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis and cell proliferation (Table 1 and Figure 4B).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Effects of fragmented IGFBP-5 on basal and IGF-I-stimulated colony formation in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures. (A) Effects of the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-51-169 (7.8 nM), IGF-I (7.8 nM), and IGFBP-51-169 coincubated with IGF-I (in a 1:1 or 2:1 molar ratio) on colony formation. (B) Effects of the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-5144-252 (7.8 nM), IGF-I (7.8 nM), and IGFBP-5144-252 coincubated with IGF-I (in a 1:1 or 2:1 molar ratio) on colony formation of chondrocytes in agarose-stabilized suspension cultures. For methods and statistical analyses, see the legend to Figure 1. Values represent the mean ± SEM of eight dishes. *P < 0.05 versus control; #P < 0.05 versus IGF-I.

 

Effects of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on the Binding of IGF-I to Growth Plate Chondrocytes
On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that IGFBP-4 and -5 modulate IGF-I actions on chondrocytes by differentially affecting the binding of IGF-I to its receptor. To examine this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on 125I-IGF-I binding to the cell surface of chondrocytes. When these cell binding assays were performed under IGFBP and tracer coincubation conditions, intact IGFBP-4 and, to a lesser extent, intact IGFBP-5 led to dose-dependent reductions in the binding of 125I-labeled IGF-I to the cell membrane (Figure 5A), presumably because soluble IGFBP-5 in the cell medium has a higher affinity for labeled IGF-I than does membrane-bound IGFBP-5 and thus masks the effect of membrane-bound IGFBP-5 on IGF-I tracer binding to the cell membrane. We therefore modified the experimental conditions and preincubated the cells in monolayer cultures with the respective IGFBP for 3 h, to allow potential cell membrane binding, followed by extensive washing. Under these experimental conditions, intact IGFBP-5 produced a dose-dependent increase in the binding of labeled IGF-I to chondrocytes, whereas preincubation with IGFBP-4 or IGFBP-51-169 did not modify 125I-IGF-I binding (Figure 5B).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Effects of added IGFBP on the binding of 125I-IGF-I to chondrocytes under coincubation (A) or preincubation (B) conditions. Cells in monolayer cultures were incubated with the indicated IGFBP, at varying concentrations, at 4°C for 3 h. For the experiments performed under preincubation conditions, the cells were washed twice before incubation with 125I-IGF-I (10,000 cpm) at 4°C for 3 h. Data are the mean of three replicate determinations in two experiments, expressed as a percentage of specific 125I-IGF-I binding in the absence of exogenous IGFBP. Control values determined in the absence of IGFBP were 896 cpm (SEM, 41 cpm). Statistical analyses were performed by using ANOVA. *P < 0.05 versus 125I-IGF-I binding in the absence of exogenous IGFBP.

 

IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 Binding to Growth Plate Chondrocytes
Next, we sought to determine whether the enhanced binding of IGF-I to the cell membrane in the presence of intact IGFBP-5 is mediated by direct binding of IGFBP-5 to the cell membrane. In serum-free monolayer cultures, intact IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-51-169 did not bind to the cell surface. 125I-IGFBP-5 bound to the chondrocyte cell surface, but this binding was only 30% affected by a 2000-fold excess of unlabeled IGFBP (1000 ng/ml), presumably because of additional binding of IGFBP-5 to extracellular matrix components (results not shown). However, when cells were suspended in buffer solution, to avoid interference with extracellular matrix components and to facilitate membrane binding, specific binding of intact IGFBP-5 and, to a lesser extent, IGFBP-5144-252, which was affected by added unlabeled IGFBP-5 but not by added unlabeled IGFBP-3, was observed (Figure 6). In contrast, intact IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-51-169 (80,000 cpm) did not bind to the cell surface (IGFBP-4, 230 ± 32 cpm bound in the absence of unlabeled IGFBP; IGFBP-51-169, 165 ± 28 cpm bound in the absence of unlabeled IGFBP).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Binding of 125I-IGFBP to suspended chondrocytes. Trypsinized cells were suspended in F-12 medium/DMEM and adjusted to a concentration of 320,000 cells/200 µl, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Cells were incubated with either intact 125I-IGFBP-5 (80,000 cpm), the carboxy-terminal fragment 125I-IGFBP-5144-252, or vehicle, in the absence or presence of varying concentrations of unlabeled IGFBP, at 4°C for 3 h. Binding of labeled intact IGFBP-5 in the presence of excess unlabeled IGFBP-3 is indicated by the dotted line. Control values determined in the absence of unlabeled IGFBP were 5218 cpm (SEM, 270 cpm; n = 6). Data are the mean ± SEM of three replicates in two different experiments, expressed as a percentage of the binding observed without added IGFBP. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA. *P < 0.05 versus 125I-IGFBP binding in the absence of exogenous IGFBP.

 

Regulation of IGFIR mRNA Abundance
Increased binding of radiolabeled IGF-I to chondrocytes in the presence of intact IGFBP-5 could be attributable to upregulation of IGFIR by IGF-I or IGFBP-5. However, IGF-I and IGFBP-5, in the presence or absence of IGF-I (24-h incubation), exhibited no effects on IGFIR mRNA abundance in cultured chondrocytes, indicating that these proteins do not regulate IGFIR within 24 h, at least at the level of gene expression (Figure 7).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Effects of IGF-I, intact IGFBP-5, and IGF-I coincubated with IGFBP-5, at the indicated concentrations, on type I IGF receptor (IGFIR) mRNA abundance, as analyzed by multiplex reverse transcription-PCR. Subconfluent chondrocytes in monolayer cultures were synchronized in serum-free medium for 12 h. The medium was then changed, and cells were incubated with the respective proteins for 24 h. The mRNA species encoding 18S rRNA and IGFIR were quantified by reverse transcription-PCR, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are the mean of two separate experiments. There was no significant difference among the groups. C, control.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study is the first report on the bioactivity in growth plate chondrocytes of intact IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 and their respective fragments isolated from CRF serum. We have demonstrated that IGFBP-4 inhibits IGF-I-stimulated cell proliferation in long-term cultures of growth plate chondrocytes, which is similar to results for other cell types, including bone cells (9,16,31), and for organ cultures of embryonic chick pelvic cartilage (32). Although intact IGFBP-4 demonstrated the most potent inhibitory effect, the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122 also significantly inhibited proliferation, although it was only approximately 50% as effective; the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-4136-237 had no effect. These results seem to be dependent on the ability of the intact molecule to bind IGF-I with higher affinity, compared with the fragmented forms of IGFBP-4, and our finding that intact IGFBP-4 does not bind to the cell surface and therefore likely sequesters IGF-I in the medium. Although we did not determine the IGF-I affinity binding profiles for each form of IGFBP-4 in this study, our data are consistent with resonance spectroscopy data showing that the carboxy-terminal fragment IGFBP-4136-237 has very low affinity for IGF-I (Kd of >60 nM), compared with IGFBP-41-122 (Kd of approximately 5 nM) and intact IGFBP-4 (Kd of 1.2 nM) (24), and with the recent demonstration that residues 72 to 91 within the amino-terminus of IGFBP-4 are essential for IGF binding (21). In the latter study, carboxy-terminal fragments (His121 to Glu237 and Arg142 to Glu237) did not bind to IGF but loss of these regions decreased IGF binding activity. Detailed deletion analyses identified the residues Cys205 to Val214 as the motif facilitating IGF binding (21). This observation explains our finding that intact IGFBP-4 was a stronger inhibitor of IGF-I-mediated chondrocyte proliferation than was the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122. One potential clinical implication of these findings is related to the need to separately quantify individual IGFBP-4 fragments in uremic serum when assays are used for determination of total IGFBP-4 concentrations. This would be particularly important for uremic children, for whom immunoreactive levels of IGFBP-4 become increased during long-term GH treatment (7).

Although the main IGF binding site in various IGFBP seems to be located in the amino-terminal part (33), other investigators have observed that the carboxy-terminal domain retains IGF-binding capacity (34,35). It has therefore been suggested that both domains contribute to the high-affinity binding of intact IGFBP (35,36). However, in our cell culture system with cultured chondrocytes, the biologic activity of the carboxyterminal fragment IGFBP-4136-237 was too weak for significant modulation of the action of IGF-I. The circulating IGFBP-4 fragments did not exhibit any IGF-independent effects on the proliferation of cultured growth plate chondrocytes (Figure 1).

Our finding that intact IGFBP-4 and, to a lesser extent, the amino-terminal fragment IGFBP-41-122 are inhibitors of IGF-I-mediated growth plate chondrocyte DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in vitro is consistent with our previous clinical observation of an inverse relationship between immunoreactive IGFBP-4 levels in CRF serum and standardized height (6). These in vitro and in vivo data strongly suggest that IGFBP-4 acts as an inhibitory IGFBP in the growth cartilage.

The mean concentration of immunoreactive IGFBP-4 in the serum of children with CRF is approximately 40 nM, and the concentration of IGFBP-5 is approximately 12 nM (6,7). It has been estimated that the concentrations of IGFBP from the 35-kD serum fraction (i.e., IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5, in addition to others) in the interstitial fluid correspond to approximately 10% of their respective serum concentrations (37). To these concentrations, the amount of IGFBP produced by the respective tissue must be added. Unpublished data from our laboratory indicate that growth plate chondrocytes are able to synthesize IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5. We therefore think that the concentration of IGFBP (7.8 nM) used in this study likely reflects the concentrations of IGFBP within the growth plates of children with CRF and is physiologically relevant. We chose the IGFBP concentration of 7.8 nM because it is equimolar with the maximally effective concentration of IGF-I (7.8 nM or 60 ng/ml) in the colony formation assay used in this study.

Our results with IGFBP-5 contrast with the inhibitory effects of IGFBP-4, although IGFBP-5 has only a slightly lower binding affinity for IGF-I (Kd = 3.7 nM) (33) than does IGFBP-4 (Kd = 1.2 nM) (24). Under identical experimental conditions, chondrocyte growth was stimulated by intact IGFBP-5, and this effect was enhanced by coincubation with IGF-I. Because the additive effect was absent when the non-IGFBP-binding form of IGF-I, des (1-3)-IGF-I, was used, we assumed that intact IGFBP-5 needed to bind IGF-I before the enhanced proliferative effect could be observed. Consistent with this hypothesis was our finding that the carboxy-terminal fragment with low IGF-I binding affinity, IGFBP-5144-252, did not enhance IGF-I-stimulated chondrocyte proliferation. Interestingly, although both intact IGFBP-5 and IGFBP-5144-252 were able to bind to chondrocyte surfaces (Figure 6), only the intact form recruited IGF-I for cell surface binding (Figure 5B). Such perturbations in the ambient IGF-I or IGFBP-5 concentrations did not alter IGFIR mRNA expression. Taken together, these results suggest that intact IGFBP-5 stimulates chondrocyte growth only when IGF-I is present and that IGFBP-5 may not have intrinsic (IGF-independent) effects on chondrocytes like those it exhibits in osteoblast cultures (13).

Also different in these studies was our finding that IGFBP-51-169 did not stimulate proliferation, in contrast to previous studies with osteoblasts (15). Rather, we observed that IGF-I-stimulated chondrocyte growth was inhibited by IGFBP-51-169, apparently by a mechanism similar to that of intact IGFBP-4, because neither binds to the chondrocyte surface nor increases IGF-I binding to the cells. This fidning is consistent with results from studies of recombinant amino-terminal fragments of IGFBP-5, which indicated that the entire IGFBP-5 protein contains only one high-affinity binding site for IGF, located between residues Ala40 and Ile92 (33), whereas the cell binding site comprises carboxy-terminal residues 169 to 252 (17). IGFBP-51-169 retains some binding affinity for IGF-I, thus mitigating IGF-I-driven chondrocyte proliferation, but does not bind to the cell membrane and is therefore not capable of enhancing IGF-I-mediated cell proliferation. Our findings differ from the previous observation that IGFBP-51-169 has intrinsic mitogenic activity in osteoblast-like cells (15). In those cells, IGFBP-51-169 was observed, in cross-linking studies, to bind to a 420-kD membrane protein (22) and to stimulate the phosphorylation of this putative serine kinase receptor (17). Those findings suggest that residues within the aminoterminus of IGFBP-5 are capable of binding to specific membrane proteins that may not exist in growth plate chondrocytes. Additional cross-linking studies must be performed to determine whether specialized receptors for IGFBP-5 are important for normal cartilage physiologic processes. Such studies may reveal that cartilage cells are, by design, deficient in IGFBP-5 signaling pathways that specify IGF-I-independent functions.

On the basis of the findings that chondrocytes in culture produce IGF, it can be speculated that IGF produced by chondrocytes could have influenced the effects of exogenously added IGFBP on cell proliferation. We observed that the IGF-I concentration in serum-free medium under basal conditions was low (2.5 to 3.5 ng/ml) in this cell culture system (38). The chondrocytes used in this study were derived from mature rats, and it is known that a developmental switch from IGF-II to IGF-I occurs in rodents, resulting in shutdown of the IGF-II promoter soon after birth. It is therefore unlikely that the effect of exogenously added IGF-I is influenced by autocrine IGF-II produced by chondrocytes.

The precise characterization of the biologic effects of inhibitory and stimulatory IGFBP and their respective fragments on IGF-I-mediated chondrocyte proliferation may have implications for new therapeutic strategies. Novel peptides that exhibit remarkable specificity in binding to defined IGFBP have recently been discovered, using phage-displayed peptide libraries (39). These peptides have the potential to act as IGF displacers by both preventing IGF-I binding to specific inhibitory IGFBP and displacing IGF-I that is bound to the IGFBP, thus increasing the amount of endogenous IGF-I that is available for binding to IGF receptors (40). An alternative approach involves IGFBP-selective IGF-I variants that are unable to bind to certain inhibitory IGFBP, with preserved affinity for other IGFBP (41). The therapeutic potential of these novel peptides in disease conditions associated with upregulated inhibitory IGFBP levels, such as renal failure, is currently being investigated.

In summary, we have demonstrated that IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 have contrasting functions in growth plate chondrocytes. Both intact IGFBP-4 and the fragment IGFBP-41-122 have exclusive inhibitory roles in IGF-I-stimulated cells, binding IGF-I in the amino-terminal domain and preventing or reducing the binding of ligand to its signaling receptor. Intact IGFBP-5, however, stimulates chondrocyte proliferation, apparently through its association with the cell membrane in the carboxy-terminal domain, thus better presenting IGF-I to its receptor. However, if accumulated amino-terminal forms of IGFBP-5 predominate, then IGFBP-5 inhibits IGF-I-stimulated proliferation. This action of amino-terminal IGFBP-5 forms in chondrocytes contrasts with the stimulatory effects of IGFBP-5 on osteoblast activity and may be important in preserving the cartilage-to-bone developmental sequence that is necessary for normal longitudinal bone growth.


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by Research Grant 316/98 from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg (to Dr. Tönshoff), by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1-AR44911 (to Dr. Andress), and by National Institutes of Health Grant AR31062 (to Dr. Mohan). Drs. Ulinski and Kiepe are recipients of scholarships from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Graduiertenkolleg Experimentelle Nieren- und Kreislaufforschung). We thank David R. Powell (Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX) and Dirk Demuth (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) for helpful suggestions. The technical assistance of Ulrike Hügel is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tönshoff B, Blum WF, Mehls O: Derangements of the somatotropic hormone axis in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 51 [Suppl 58]:106 -113, 1997
  2. Powell DR, Liu F, Baker BK, Hinzt RL, Kale A, Suwanichkul A, Durham SK: Effect of chronic renal failure and growth hormone therapy on the insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins. Pediatr Nephrol 14:579 -583, 2000[Medline]
  3. Blum WF, Ranke MB, Kietzmann K, Tönshoff B, Mehls O: Growth hormone resistance and inhibition of somatomedin activity by excess of insulin-like growth factor binding protein in uraemia. Pediatr Nephrol5 : 539-544,1991[Medline]
  4. Tönshoff B, Blum WF, Wingen AM, Mehls O: Serum insulinlike growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins 1, 2, and 3 in children with chronic renal failure: Relationship to height and glomerular filtration rate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab80 : 2684-2691,1995[Abstract]
  5. Powell DR, Liu F, Baker BK, Hintz RL, Lee PD, Durham SK, Brewer ED, Frane JW, Watkins SL, Hogg RJ: Modulation of growth factors by growth hormone in children with chronic renal failure: The Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. Kidney Int 51:1970 -1979, 1997[Medline]
  6. Ulinski T, Mohan S, Kiepe D, Blum WF, Wingen AM, Mehls O, Tonshoff B: Serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein. Pediatr Nephrol 14:589 -597, 2000[Medline]
  7. Powell DR, Durham SK, Brewer ED, Frane JW, Watkins SL, Hogg RJ, Mohan S: Effects of chronic renal failure and growth hormone on serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) and IGFBP-5 in children: A report of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:596 -601, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Jehle PM, Ostertag A, Schulten K, Schulz W, Jehle DR, Stracke S, Fiedler R, Deuber HJ, Keller F, Boehm BO, Baylink DJ, Mohan S: Insulin-like growth factor system components in hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy. Kidney Int 57:423 -436, 2000[Medline]
  9. Mohan S, Bautista CM, Wergedal J, Baylink DJ: Isolation of an inhibitory insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein from bone cell-conditioned medium: A potential local regulator of IGF action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8338 -8342, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Culouscou JM, Shoyab M: Purification of a colon cancer cell growth inhibitor and its identification as an insulin-like growth factor binding protein. Cancer Res 51:2813 -2819, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cheung PT, Smith EP, Shimasaki S, Ling N, Chernausek SD: Characterization of an insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP-4) produced by the B104 rat neuronal cell line: Chemical and biological properties and differential synthesis by sublines. Endocrinology 129:1006 -1015, 1991[Abstract]
  12. Duan C, Clemmons DR: Differential expression and biological effects of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 and -5 in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 273:16836 -16842, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Andress DL, Birnbaum RS: Human osteoblast-derived insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 stimulates osteoblast mitogenesis and potentiates IGF action. J Biol Chem267 : 22467-22472,1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Jones JI, Gockerman A, Busby WH Jr, Camacho-Hubner C, Clemmons DR: Extracellular matrix contains insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5: Potentiation of the effects of IGF-I. J Cell Biol121 : 679-687,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Andress DL, Loop SM, Zapf J, Kiefer MC: Carboxy-truncated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 stimulates mitogenesis in osteoblast-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun195 : 25-30,1993[Medline]
  16. Mohan S, Nakao Y, Honda Y, Landale E, Leser U, Dony C, Lang K, Baylink DJ: Studies on the mechanisms by which insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) and IGFBP-5 modulate IGF actions in bone cells. J Biol Chem 270:20424 -20431, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Andress DL: Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) stimulates phosphorylation of the IGFBP-5 receptor. Am J Physiol 274:E744 -E750, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kiefer MC, Schmid C, Waldvogel M, Schlapfer I, Futo E, Masiarz FR, Green K, Barr PJ, Zapf J: Characterization of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 4, 5 and 6 produced in yeast. J Biol Chem 267:12692 -12699, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ewton DZ, Coolican SA, Mohan S, Chernausek SD, Florini JR: Modulation of insulin-like growth factor actions in L6A1 myoblasts by insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5: A dual role for IGFBP-5, J Cell Physiol177 : 47-57,1998[Medline]
  20. Klaus G, Weber L, Rodriguez J, Fernandez P, Klein T, Grulich-Henn J, Hugel U, Ritz E, Mehls O: Interaction of IGF-I and 1{alpha},25(OH)2D3 on receptor expression and growth stimulation in rat growth plate chondrocytes. Kidney Int 53:1152 -1161, 1998[Medline]
  21. Qin X, Strong DD, Baylink DJ, Mohan S: Structure-function analysis of the human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4. J Biol Chem 273:23509 -23516, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Andress DL: Heparin modulates the binding of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 to a membrane protein in osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 270:28289 -28296, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ständker L, Wobst P, Mark S, Forssmann WG: Isolation and characterization of circulating 13-kDa C-terminal fragments of human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5. FEBS Lett 441:281 -286, 1998[Medline]
  24. Ständker L, Braulke T, Mark S, Mostafavi H, Meyer M, Honing S, Gimenez-Gallego G, Forssmann WG: Partial IGF affinity of circulating N- and C-terminal fragments of human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) and the disulfide bonding pattern of the C-terminal IGFBP-4 domain. Biochemistry39 : 5082-5088,2000[Medline]
  25. Klaus G, von Eichel B, May T, Hugel U, Mayer H, Ritz E, Mehls O: Synergistic effects of parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on proliferation and vitamin D receptor expression of rat growth cartilage cells. Endocrinology 135:1307 -1315, 1994[Abstract]
  26. Benya PD, Shaffer JD: Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell 30:215 -224, 1982[Medline]
  27. Lindahl A, Isgaard J, Carlsson L, Isaksson OG: Differential effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I on colony formation of epiphyseal chondrocytes in suspension culture in rats of different ages. Endocrinology 121:1061 -1069, 1987[Abstract]
  28. Klaus G, Merke J, Eing H, Hugel U, Milde P, Reichel H, Ritz E, Mehls O: 1,25(OH)2D3 receptor regulation and 1,25(OH)2D3 effects in primary cultures of growth cartilage cells of the rat. Calcif Tissue Int49 : 340-348,1991[Medline]
  29. Schumacher R, Soos MA, Schlessinger J, Brandenburg D, Siddle K, Ullrich A: Signaling-competent receptor chimeras allow mapping of major insulin receptor binding domain determinants. J Biol Chem 268:1087 -1094, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Werner H, Woloschak M, Adamo M, Shen-Orr Z, Roberts CT Jr, LeRoith D: Developmental regulation of the rat insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA86 : 7451-7455,1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Jones JI, Clemmons DR: Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: Biological actions. Endocr Rev16 : 3-34,1995[Medline]
  32. Schiltz PM, Mohan S, Baylink DJ: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 inhibits both basal and IGF-mediated chick pelvic cartilage growth in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 8:391 -396, 1993[Medline]
  33. Kalus W, Zweckstetter M, Renner C, Sanchez Y, Georgescu J, Grol M, Demuth D, Schumacher R, Dony C, Lang K, Holak TA: Structure of the IGF-binding domain of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5): Implications for IGF and IGF-I receptor interactions. EMBO J 17: 6558-6572,1998[Medline]
  34. Forbes BE, Turner D, Hodge SJ, McNeil KA, Forsberg G, Wallace JC: Localization of an insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding site of bovine IGF binding protein-2 using disulfide mapping and deletion mutation analysis of the C-terminal domain. J Biol Chem273 : 4647-4652,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ho PJ, Baxter RC: Characterization of truncated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 in human milk. Endocrinology138 : 3811-3818,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Spencer EM, Chan K: A 3-dimensional model for the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs): Supporting evidence using the structural determinants of the IGF binding site on IGFBP-3. Prog Growth Factor Res 6:209 -214, 1995[Medline]
  37. Kale AS, Liu F, Hintz RL, Baker BK, Brewer ED, Lee PD, Durham SK, Powell DR: Characterization of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in peritoneal dialysate. Pediatr Nephrol10 : 467-473,1996[Medline]
  38. Jux C, Leiber K, Hügel U, Blum W, Ohlsson C, Klaus G, Mehls O: Dexamethasone impairs growth hormone (GH)-stimulated growth by suppression of local insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I production and expression of GH- and IGF-I-receptor in cultured rat chondrocytes. Endocrinology139 : 3296-3305,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lowman HB, Chen YM, Skelton NJ, Mortensen DL, Tomlinson EE, Sadick MD, Robinson IC, Clark RG: Molecular mimics of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) for inhibiting IGF-1:IGF-binding protein interactions. Biochemistry 37:8870 -8878, 1998[Medline]
  40. Roelfsema V, Lane MH, Clark RG: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) displacers: Relevance to the treatment of renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 14:584 -588, 2000[Medline]
  41. Modric T, Silha JV, Shi Z, Gui Y, Suwanichkul A, Durham SK, Powell DR, Murphy LJ: Phenotypic manifestations of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 overexpression in transgenic mice. Endocrinology 142:1958 -1967, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication January 29, 2001. Accepted for publication May 9, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Kiepe, A. Van Der Pas, S. Ciarmatori, L. Standker, B. Schutt, A. Hoeflich, U. Hugel, J. Oh, and B. Tonshoff
Defined Carboxy-Terminal Fragments of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-2 Exert Similar Mitogenic Activity on Cultured Rat Growth Plate Chondrocytes as IGF-I
Endocrinology, October 1, 2008; 149(10): 4901 - 4911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Ning, B. Hoang, A. G. P. Schuller, T. P. Cominski, M.-S. Hsu, T. L. Wood, and J. E. Pintar
Delayed Mammary Gland Involution in Mice with Mutation of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5 Gene
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2138 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Ciarmatori, D. Kiepe, A. Haarmann, U. Huegel, and B. Tonshoff
Signaling mechanisms leading to regulation of proliferation and differentiation of the mesenchymal chondrogenic cell line RCJ3.1C5.18 in response to IGF-I
J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 38(4): 493 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Kiepe, S. Ciarmatori, A. Haarmann, and B. Tonshoff
Differential expression of IGF system components in proliferating vs. differentiating growth plate chondrocytes: the functional role of IGFBP-5
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2006; 290(2): E363 - E371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Kiepe, S. Ciarmatori, A. Hoeflich, E. Wolf, and B. Tonshoff
Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I Stimulates Cell Proliferation and Induces IGF Binding Protein (IGFBP)-3 and IGFBP-5 Gene Expression in Cultured Growth Plate Chondrocytes via Distinct Signaling Pathways
Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 3096 - 3104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. Gigante, S. Rubattu, R. Stanzione, A. Lombardi, A. Baldi, F. Baldi, and M. Volpe
Contribution of Genetic Factors to Renal Lesions in the Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 702 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KIEPE, D.
Right arrow Articles by TÖNSHOFF, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KIEPE, D.
Right arrow Articles by TÖNSHOFF, B.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP