Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VOS, I. H. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOLES, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VOS, I. H. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOLES, J. A.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:361-367, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

L-Arginine Supplementation Improves Function and Reduces Inflammation in Renal Allografts

INGRID H. C. VOS*, TON J. RABELINK{dagger}, BERT DORLAND{ddagger}, REMKO LOOS{ddagger}, BEN VAN MIDDELAAR*, HERMANN-JOSEF GRÖNE§ and JAAP A. JOLES*

* Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands
§ Department of Department of Cellular and Molecular Pathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr. Ton J. Rabelink, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, F02-126, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-2537399; Fax: 31-30-2523741; E-mail: T.Rabelink{at}digd.azu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Recovery from ischemia/reperfusion and immune-mediated injury in the renal transplant is associated with reduced renal hemodynamics and increased leukocyte infiltration. In diverse models of renal failure, L-arginine supplementation improved hemodynamics and reduced inflammation. However in a proinflammatory environment, L-arginine can worsen renal injury. This study investigated the therapeutic potential of L-arginine supplementation in allogeneic renal transplantation: Brown Norway rat kidneys were transplanted into Lewis rat recipients, with one native kidney remaining. Recipients received low-dose cyclosporin A (2.5 mg/kg per d subcutaneously) to obtain moderate vascular and interstitial rejection, with or without 1% L-arginine in drinking water for 7 d posttransplantation. Transplantation increased renal vasoconstriction (from 16.9 ± 1.33 to 35.1 ± 8.6 units; P < 0.01), thereby reducing GFR (from 0.96 ± 0.09 to 0.48 ± 0.10 ml/min; P < 0.05). Treatment with L-arginine restored renal graft function to levels found in normal donors (renal vascular resistance, 15.7 ± 1.69 units; GFR, 0.80 ± 0.06 ml/min). L-arginine significantly reduced vascular occlusion because of less inflammation, endothelial disruption, and thrombosis. L-arginine also decreased tubulitis, interstitial injury, and macrophage infiltration. These protective effects suggest that L-arginine might be useful as additive therapy to conventional immune suppression.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nephroprotective effects of L-arginine have been observed in diverse models of renal failure, including uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure (1), puromycin-induced nephrotic syndrome (2), and chronic renal insufficiency caused by ablation (3,4) or obstructive nephropathy (5,6). L-arginine supplementation was consistently associated with improvement of GFR and reduction in macrophage infiltration (7). In the current study, we investigated the effects of L-arginine on renal function and rejection in renal allografts. This is of particular interest as L-arginine may have nephroprotective as well as proinflammatory effects, considering that renal allograft rejection is characterized by a proinflammatory milieu.

There are multiple pathways by which L-arginine could influence function and morphology of the transplanted kidney. L-arginine can be converted by arginine decarboxylase into agmatine, which could increase GFR (8,9). L-arginine can also stimulate secretion of glucagon (10), which is known to increase GFR (11). When metabolized by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) to nitric oxide and L-citrulline, L-arginine supplementation could be expected to cause vasodilation as well as to reduce inflammation (12).

Conversely, L-arginine may be harmful if it enhances activity of inducible NOS. We previously demonstrated that tubulointerstitial rejection in renal allografts is mediated by activation of the inducible isoform of NOS (13). Moreover, when L-arginine is metabolized by arginase to urea and L-ornithine (14), polyamine and proline can be generated, which could promote proliferation and collagen formation respectively (15). Hence, the dual ability of L-arginine to mediate renal protection as well as renal injury emphasizes the need to investigate the net effects of supplementary L-arginine on functional and inflammatory aspects of rejection in allogeneic kidney transplantation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Left kidneys of male Brown Norway (BN = RT1n) rats were transplanted heterotopically into male Lewis (LEW = RT11) recipients, with one native kidney in situ. The donors (180 to 210 g) and the recipients (300 to 350 g) were obtained from Harlan (Bicester, UK) and housed under standard conditions (day/night, 12/12; humidity, 55%; temperature, 22°C) with water and chow (RMH-TM rat chow: protein, 22.2%; fat, 4.8%; potassium, 0.85%; sodium, 0.40%; arginine 1.26%; Hope Farms, Woerden, The Netherlands) ad libitum. The Utrecht University Committee for study in experimental animals approved the protocol.

Experimental Design
Two groups of kidney recipients were examined. All recipients received a low dose of cyclosporin (CyA; 2.5 mg/kg per d; Sandimune, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) to allow moderate vascular and interstitial rejection. CyA was injected twice daily subcutaneously in half daily doses. Experimental groups consisted of recipients that were treated with CyA alone (n = 7), recipients that received CyA plus 1% L-arginine in the drinking water (n = 6), and recipients that were untreated (n = 6). Administration of CyA and supplementation with L-arginine started approximately 5 h after transplantation; the first administration of L-arginine was by gavage (1 g L-arginine/kg dissolved in a maximum volume of 1 ml of distilled water) and was continued by supplementation in the drinking water (10 g/L). Body weight and water intake were monitored daily. In addition, we included sham controls: Brown Norway rats that received L-arginine (10 g/L) in the drinking water (n = 8) or that were left untreated (n = 10), as well as untreated Lewis rats (n = 6).

Surgical Procedures
Donor nephrectomy, preservation, and heterotopic kidney transplantation procedures were performed as described previously by Fisher and Lee (16) with some modification (12). The right donor kidney was perfused with and preserved in Custodiol (HTK-Tramedico, Alsbach, Germany) at 4°C. Cold ischemia was limited to 15 min. The vascular anastomoses were performed in an end-to-side manner using 8-0 nylon suture (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Blood flow was restored to the graft within 30 min. After vascular anastomoses were checked for leakage, the ureter anastomosis was performed using 11-0 nylon suture in an end-to-end manner.

Clearance experiments occurred 7 d posttransplantation under Inactin anesthesia to determine clearances of inulin (Cin) and paraaminohippuric acid (CPAH), using conventional techniques (17). Therefore, the left jugular vein was catheterized for infusions. The right femoral artery was catheterized for continuous measurement of mean arterial pressure and to draw arterial blood samples for determination of hematocrit and plasma concentrations of inulin and PAH. An arterial blood sample was drawn at the start, midpoint, and end of the whole clearance period. We catheterized the ureter of the contralateral kidney while the transplanted kidney continued to drain into the bladder, in which a catheter was placed through a midline incision. Equivalent collections were performed in the sham controls. After a 1-h equilibration period, CPAH and Cin were measured during four 30-min urine collections to assess GFR and renal blood flow (RBF) in both kidneys separately. Inulin and PAH concentrations were measured photometrically with indoleacetic acid after hydrolyzation to fructose and by a chromogenic aldehyde reaction respectively.

Amino Acid Analysis
Terminal blood samples were used for assessment of plasma L-arginine levels. Quantitative analysis of plasma L-arginine was performed on a Biochrom 20 amino acid analyzer with an ion-exchange column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Cambridge, UK).

Graft Sampling and Immunohistochemical Staining
At day 7 posttransplantation, after the clearance experiment, the rats were exsanguinated and kidneys were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry. The middle slices of the harvested graft were fixed in formalin or methacarn, embedded in paraffin, and stained with periodic acid-Schiff and trichrome.

Immunohistochemistry was carried out on 5-µm sections of paraffin-embedded tissue. The monoclonal antibody ED1 (Serotec, Camon, Wiesbaden, Germany) was used on methacarn-fixed tissue at a dilution of 1:100 to demonstrate monocytes/macrophages. An alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase detection system was applied (Dako, Hamburg, Germany).

Histologic Evaluation
Periodic acid-Schiff stained sections of grafts were evaluated (coded, blinded) for evidence of rejection and tubulointerstitial injury using light microscopy. The various types of injury were semiquantitatively scored from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no pathologic changes, 1 slight, 2 moderate, and 3 severe alterations (13). Vascular changes caused by adhesion of inflammatory mononuclear cells to intima, thrombosis, or necrosis were evaluated for all preglomerular vessels per whole kidney section. Total vascular injury index was calculated as the sum of the severity scores (1, slight; 2, moderate; 3, severe lesions), which were multiplied by the percentage of vessels displaying the concerning score. Fifty glomeruli per kidney section were evaluated for ischemic collapse, capillary obliteration by thrombosis, and mesangial matrix increase. Tubulitis was evaluated in 10 high-power fields (40x objective) with interstitial inflammation, by the number of infiltrated mononuclear cells in the tubular epithelium; a score of 1, indicated 4 cells per tubular cross section; 2, 4-9 cells; 3, more than 10 cells per cross section. The interstitial injury index was semiquantitatively scored in 10 high-power fields (40x objective); a score of 0 indicated interstitial integrity; 1, occasional infiltration; 2, focal infiltration and minor edema; 3, infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells, with more than 60% of the interstitial field covered, combined with edema and/or collapse of tubular cross sections. The number of ED1+ cells (monocytes/macrophages) was counted per glomerular cross section in 100 glomeruli and also in 15 high-power fields (40x objective) of tubulointerstitium.

Statistical Analyses
T test was used to compare the morphologic data between CyA-treated controls and CyA+ L-arginine-treated kidney recipients. One way ANOVA was used to analyze the clearance data of the transplanted and contralateral kidneys. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arginine Intake
L-arginine intake increased to 101 ± 5 mg/100 g body wt per d in the supplemented LEW recipients as compared with recipients that were treated with CyA alone (57 ± 10 mg/100 g body wt per d), where intake was via the diet only. L-arginine did not increase water intake. L-arginine intake in the sham BN donors with and without L-arginine in the drinking water was 190 ± 9 mg/100 g body wt per d and 51 ± 10 mg/100 g body wt per d, respectively. L-arginine intake in the sham donors was higher than in the transplanted LEW rats (P < 0.01). This was not due to differences in food intake. However, sham BN rats drank more than did LEW rats that underwent transplantation (12 ± 0.4 ml/100 g body wt per d versus 6 ± 0.4 ml/100 g body wt per d, respectively; P < 0.01). Plasma L-arginine levels were slightly increased in terminal blood samples after clearance experiments in the L-arginine supplemented rats (105 ± 6 versus 83 ± 10 µmol/L; P = 0.08).

Renal Function
To assess the effect of L-arginine supplementation on renal function in the early phase posttransplantation, we examined renal function of the renal allograft after 7 d of treatment with CyA alone versus CyA plus L-arginine as well as in sham controls with and without L-arginine. Untreated recipients were also studied. Means of functional parameters are presented in Tables 1 and 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Renal hemodynamic parameters in the donor kidney before and after transplantationa
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Renal hemodynamic parameters in the recipient's contralateral kidney before and after transplantationa
 

There were no differences in mean arterial pressure. Hematocrit was decreased in the untreated recipients. Transplantation with low-dose CyA resulted in a twofold reduction of GFR in the graft, a substantial decrease of RBF, and a higher renal vascular resistance (RVR) compared with control donor kidneys (Table 1). L-arginine increased GFR and RBF in the renal graft; hence, RVR was decreased. L-arginine had no effects in sham controls, even though L-arginine intake was higher (see above). Untreated grafts were anuric. The hemodynamic parameters of the recipient's contralateral kidney are presented in Table 2. Absolute values of GFR, RBF, and RVR did not differ between the sham and immune-suppressed groups. However, renal function in the contralateral kidney of untreated recipients showed a compensatory increase.

Renal Pathology
To examine the effect of L-arginine supplementation on the pathologic features of renal allografts, we evaluated kidney weight and the extent of vascular, glomerular, interstitial, and tubular lesions in CyA alone compared with L-arginine-supplemented renal transplants. At 7 d after transplantation, the relative weight of renal graft and the spleen were comparable in the CyA alone and L-arginine-supplemented groups (Table 3). The contralateral native kidneys did not show pathologic lesions. However, in renal allografts treated with only a low-dose CyA, there were indications of acute cellular rejection with vascular, glomerular, and tubulointerstitial lesions as a result of the residual allogeneic response (Figure 1A).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Vascular, glomerular, and tubulointerstitial injury in renal allograftsa
 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. (A) Allograft treated with cyclosporine A (CyA, 2.5 mg/kg per d) showing a slight ischemic glomerulus with three granulocytes and an injured artery with activated endothelium. (B) Allograft treated with CyA+L-arginine with a normal glomerulus and a regular vessel with nonactivated flat endothelium. (C) Allograft treated with CyA showing an injured arteriole with subendothelial hyalinosis and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrate. (D) Allograft treated with CyA+L-arginine with a normal blood vessel and only minor infiltration of mononuclear cells. Magnifications: x 100 (periodic acid-Schiff [PAS]) in A and B; x 150 (PAS) in C and D.

 

L-arginine supplementation significantly reduced intrarenal vascular occlusion (Figure 1, B and D). There was less endothelial swelling, inflammation, and thrombosis than in the CyA-treated grafts (Figure 1, A and C). Tubulointerstitial injury was also reduced by L-arginine. Renal cortex and outer medulla demonstrated less tubulitis. Interstitial injury, including amount and expansion of interstitial cell infiltrates and interstitial edema, was clearly reduced after L-arginine supplementation (Figures 1B and 2B).



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. (A) Allograft treated with CyA with perivascular infiltration of monocytes and macrophages in the cortex. (B) Allograft treated with CyA+L-arginine with only slight and focal perivascular infiltration of monocytes and macrophages. Magnification, x50 (ED1).

 

Native kidneys had practically no adherent and infiltrating cells in glomeruli or around blood vessels. In the grafts, treated with low doses of CyA, ED1+ cells were the dominant infiltrating cells that accumulated in perivascular and periglomerular clusters (Figure 2A). Although L-arginine did not significantly affect the number of ED+ cells in glomeruli or in interstitium, CyA+L-arginine-treated grafts demonstrated smaller perivascular cell infiltrates with minor extension to the interstitium (Figure 2B).

Untreated allografts characteristically showed a fibrotic capsule enclosing necrotic tissue (12). Graft weight was increased (0.69 ± 0.05 g/100 g body wt; P < 0.05). Spleen weight was also increased (0.37 ± 0.03 g/100 g body wt; P < 0.05), indicating an unsuppressed immune response. Histologic examination revealed practically no viable tissue.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Daily supplementation of L-arginine to low-dose CyA-treated recipients of a renal allograft improved renal function, i.e., increased GFR and RBF. L-arginine supplementation also reduced inflammation, endothelial disruption, and thrombosis and decreased interstitial injury by reducing macrophage infiltration and edema formation. This is the first study that supports the use of L-arginine as an additive therapy to conventional immune suppression in renal allograft rejection.

Whole organ and micropuncture measurements in rejecting allogeneic kidney transplants showed that decreases in GFR and RBF were due to increased afferent arteriolar resistance, decrease of glomerular capillary pressure, plasma flow, and single-nephron GFR. Because only minor glomerular lesions accompanied these alterations in renal hemodynamics, it was postulated that these changes were due to preglomerular vasoactive constriction (18,19). It has also been demonstrated that such hemodynamic changes contribute to the development of chronic graft failure (20,21). Chronic administration of high doses of CyA to normal rats increased afferent resistance and reduced the ultrafiltration coefficient, leading to a fall in single-nephron and whole-kidney GFR (22). Thus, both transplantation and CyA can induce a decline in GFR and RBF. In the current study, however, we presumed no functional vasoactive effects of the low dose of CyA that we used, because L-arginine did not increase GFR or RBF in the contralateral native kidneys of the recipients. Furthermore, these kidneys were free of vascular and glomerular injury and the beneficial effects of L-arginine on renal hemodynamics were restricted to the grafts. This suggests that the hemodynamic effects in the renal allograft were through direct interference of L-arginine with ischemia/reperfusion (23,24) and with the subsequent inflammation.

Timing of L-arginine supplementation also seems to be critical for its effects. Saunder et al. (24) showed that L-arginine in the perfusate improved renal function and survival after 5-d perfusion preservation of the isogenic donor kidney. Also, Shoskes et al. (25) observed improved recovery from ischemic damage when L-arginine was started on the day before surgery. In nonischemic models of renal failure, when treatment was started immediately after surgery, L-arginine markedly increased GFR in rats after release of ureteral obstruction (2) as well as in 5/6 nephrectomized rats (3,26). However, when L-arginine supplementation was started after the onset of chronic renal failure, no nephroprotective effects of L-arginine in chronic renal failure were detected (27). In the present study, 1% L-arginine, started on the day of transplantation, in fact could prevent the fall of GFR in the graft. We administered a 1% supplementation in the drinking water, because this dose is in the optimal range as described by Tanaka et al. (28), who found that larger doses of L-arginine failed to increase NO and aggravated glomerulosclerosis in a remnant kidney model. This concentration of L-arginine in drinking water still caused a 20-µM increase in plasma L-arginine concentration 4 to 5 h after last access to supplemented L-arginine water. Arnal et al. (29) demonstrated that adding L-arginine at 10 µM or more to endothelial cells dose-dependently increased NO release.

Proinflammatory effects of L-arginine administration have been reported in models of renal injury characterized by leukocyte influx (30). However, in the present study, L-arginine numerically reduced perivascular and tubulointerstitial macrophage infiltration. Others and we previously established that this macrophage influx facilitates immune-mediated rejection (31,32,33). This indicates that L-arginine supplementation would support anti-inflammatory mechanisms rather that stimulate proinflammatory or proliferative pathways such as inducible NOS activity or arginase-proline metabolism, despite that renal allograft rejection is characterized by leukocyte infiltration. Our data do not allow conclusions to the mechanisms involved, but we recently demonstrated that activation of the transcription factor NF-{kappa}B is a key mechanism that controls macrophage influx in the renal allograft (34). It is therefore of interest that the same dose of L-arginine blunted the activation of NF-{kappa}B (35) in kidneys with unilateral ureter obstruction and reduced expression of RANTES (36). Notably, NF-{kappa}B-mediated inflammation is inhibited by NO (37,38,39), and it is therefore attractive to postulate that the beneficial effects of L-arginine were at least partly due to increased formation of NO. Moreover, in a similar renal transplantation model, the L-arginine analogues L-NAME and L-NNA demonstrated exacerbation of rejection, namely macrophage infiltration and vascular injury (12). Our study indicates that L-arginine administration as additive treatment to immune suppression in renal transplantation deserves further exploration because of its anti-inflammatory potential as well as its beneficial effects on recovery of renal graft function.


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Gr7286/1 to 3 to H.-J.G., and by the Dutch Kidney Foundation.

The study was presented in part at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, Miami Beach, 1999, and published in abstract form (J Am Soc Nephrol 10: A3624, 1999).

The excellent technical assistance of M. Schurink and C. Schmidt is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schramm L, Heidbreder E, Lopau K, Schaar J, Zimmermann J, Harlos J, Teschner M, Ling H, Heidland A: Influence of nitric oxide on renal function in toxic acute renal failure in the rat. Miner Electrolyte Metab 22:168 -177, 1996[Medline]
  2. Reyes AA, Porras BH, Chasalow FI, Klahr S: L-arginine decreases the infiltration of the kidney by macrophages in obstructive nephropathy and puromycin-induced nephrosis. Kidney Int45 : 1346-1354,1994[Medline]
  3. Ingram A, Parbtani A, Thai K, Ly H, Shankland SJ, Morrissey G, Scholey JW: Dietary supplementation with L-arginine limits cell proliferation in the remnant glomerulus. Kidney Int48 : 1857-1865,1995[Medline]
  4. Reyes AA, Purkerson ML, Karl I, Klahr S: Dietary supplementation with L-arginine ameliorates the progression of renal disease in rats with subtotal nephrectomy. Am J Kidney Dis20 : 168-176,1992[Medline]
  5. Morrissey JJ, Ishidoya S, McCracken R, Klahr S: Nitric oxide generation ameliorates the tubulointerstitial fibrosis of obstructive nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol7 : 2202-2212,1996[Abstract]
  6. Reyes AA, Karl IE, Klahr S: Role of arginine in health and in renal disease. Am J Physiol 267:F331 -F346, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Klahr S: Can L-arginine manipulation reduce renal disease? Semin Nephrol 19:304 -309, 1999[Medline]
  8. Lortie MJ, Novotny WF, Peterson OW, Vallon V, Malvey K, Mendonca M, Satriano J, Insel P, Thomson SC, Blantz RC: Agmatine, a bioactive metabolite of arginine. Production, degradation, and functional effects in the kidney of the rat. J Clin Invest 97:413 -420, 1996[Medline]
  9. Schwartz D, Peterson OW, Mendonca M, Satriano J, Lortie M, Blantz RC: Agmatine affects glomerular filtration via a nitric oxide synthase-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol272 : F597-F601,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zhang XZ, Ghio L, Ardissino G, Tirelli AS, Dacco V, Testa S, Claris-Appiani A: Renal and metabolic effects of L-arginine infusion in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol52 : 37-43,1999[Medline]
  11. Solerte SB, Rondanelli M, Giacchero R, Stabile M, Lovati E, Cravello L, Pontiggia B, Vignati G, Ferrari E, Fioravanti M: Serum glucagon concentration and hyperinsulinaemia influence renal haemodynamics and urinary protein loss in normotensive patients with central obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23:997 -1003, 1999[Medline]
  12. Stojanovic T, Gröne HJ, Gieseler RK, Klanke B, Schlemminger R, Tsikas D, Gröne EF: Enhanced renal allograft rejection by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase: A nonimmunologic influence on alloreactivity. Lab Invest74 : 496-512,1996[Medline]
  13. Vos IHC, Joles JA, Schurink M, Weckbecker G, Stojanovic T, Rabelink TJ, Gröne H-J: Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase improves graft function and reduces tubulointerstitial injury in renal allograft rejection. Eur J Pharm391 : 31-38,2000[Medline]
  14. Wu G, Morris SM Jr: Arginine metabolism: Nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem J 336(Pt 1):1 -17, 1998
  15. Peters H, Border WA, Noble NA: From rats to man: A perspective on dietary L-arginine supplementation in human renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1640 -1650, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Fisher B, Lee S: Microvascular surgical techniques in research with special reference to renal transplantation in the rat. Surgery 58:904 -914, 1965
  17. Turkstra E, Braam B, Koomans HA: Nitric oxide release as an essential mitigating step in tubuloglomerular feedback: Observations during intrarenal nitric oxide clamp. J Am Soc Nephrol9 : 1596-1603,1998[Abstract]
  18. Munger KA, Coffman TM, Griffiths RC, Fogo A, Badr KF: The effects of surgery and acute rejection on glomerular hemodynamics in the transplanted rat kidney. Transplantation 55:1219 -1224, 1993[Medline]
  19. Alejandro V, Scandling JD Jr, Sibley RK, Dafoe D, Alfrey E, Deen W, Myers BD: Mechanisms of filtration failure during postischemic injury of the human kidney. A study of the reperfused renal allograft. J Clin Invest 95:820 -831, 1995
  20. Azuma H, Paul LC, Tilney NL: Insights into acute and chronic rejection. Transplant Proc 28:2081 -2084, 1996[Medline]
  21. Paul LC: Chronic renal transplant loss. Kidney Int 47:1491 -1499, 1995[Medline]
  22. Bobadilla NA, Tapia E, Franco M, Lopez P, Mendoza S, Garcia-Torres R, Alvarado JA, Herrera-Acosta J: Role of nitric oxide in renal hemodynamic abnormalities of cyclosporin nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int 46: 773-779,1994[Medline]
  23. Huk I, Nanobashvili J, Neumayer C, Punz A, Mueller M, Afkhampour K, Mittlboeck M, Losert U, Polterauer P, Roth E, Patton S, Malinski T: L-arginine treatment alters the kinetics of nitric oxide and superoxide release and reduces ischemia/reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. Circulation 96:667 -755, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Saunder A, Danielewicz R, Ametani M, Southard JH, Belzer FO: L-arginine in 5-day perfusion of canine kidneys. Transplant Proc 25:3004 -3005, 1993[Medline]
  25. Shoskes DA, Xie Y, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF: Nitric oxide synthase activity in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat: Implications for renal transplantation. Transplantation63 : 495-500,1997[Medline]
  26. Ashab I, Peer G, Blum M, Wollman Y, Chernihovsky T, Hassner A, Schwartz D, Cabili S, Silverberg D, Iaina A: Oral administration of L-arginine and captopril in rats prevents chronic renal failure by nitric oxide production. Kidney Int 47:1515 -1521, 1995[Medline]
  27. De Nicola L, Bellizzi V, Minutolo R, Andreucci M, Capuano A, Garibotto G, Corso G, Andreucci VE, Cianciaruso B: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of arginine supplementation in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 56:674 -684, 1999[Medline]
  28. Tanaka T, Nakanishi T, Hasuike Y, Inoue T, Noguchi K, Takamitsu Y: Paradoxical effect of L-arginine on nitric oxide (NO) synthesis and histopathological changes in 5/6 nephrectomized SD rats [in Japanese]. Nippon Jinzo Gakkai Shi 41:754 -763, 1999[Medline]
  29. Arnal JF, Munzel T, Venema RC, James NL, Bai CL, Mitch WE, Harrison DG: Interactions between L-arginine and L-glutamine change endothelial NO production. An effect independent of NOsynthase substrate availability. J Clin Invest 95:2565 -2572, 1995
  30. Peters H, Border WA, Noble NA: L-arginine supplementation increases mesangial cell injury and subsequent tissue fibrosis in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int55 : 2264-2273,1999[Medline]
  31. Kusaka M, Zandi-Nejad K, Kato S, Beato F, Nagano H, Shaw GD, Tilney NL: Exploitation of the continuum between early ischemia/reperfusion injury and host alloresponsiveness: Indefinite kidney allograft survival by treatment with a soluble P-selectin ligand and low-dose cyclosporine in combination. Transplantation 67:1255 -1261, 1999[Medline]
  32. Azuma H, Nadeau KC, Ishibashi M, Tilney NL: Prevention of functional, structural, and molecular changes of chronic rejection of rat renal allografts by a specific macrophage inhibitor. Transplantation 60:1577 -1582, 1995[Medline]
  33. Gröne HJ, Weber C, Weber KS, Gröne EF, Rabelink T, Klier CM, Wells TN, Proudfood AE, Schlondorff D, Nelson PJ: Met-RANTES reduces vascular and tubular damage during acute renal transplant rejection: Blocking monocyte arrest and recruitment. FASEB J13 : 1371-1383,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Vos IHC, Govers R, Gröne H-J, Kleij L, Schurink M, Weger de RA, Goldschmeding R, Rabelink TJ: NF{kappa}B decoy oligodeoxynucleotides reduce monocyte infiltration in renal allografts. FASEB J 14:815 -822, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Morrissey J, KIahr S: Arginine administration blunts activation of nuclear factor kB in the kidney of rats with ureteral obstruction [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:A1541 , 1997
  36. Haberstroh U, Stilo K, Pocock J, Wolf G, Helmchen U, Wenzel U, Zahner G, Stahl RA, Thaiss F: L-arginine suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of RANTES in glomeruli. J Am Soc Nephrol9 : 203-210,1998[Abstract]
  37. Peng HB, Rajavashisth TB, Libby P, Liao JK: Nitric oxide inhibits macrophage-colony stimulating factor gene transcription in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem270 : 17050-17055,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. De Caterina R, Libby P, Peng HB, Thannickal VJ, Rajavashisth TB, Gimbrone MA, Jr, Shin WS, Liao JK: Nitric oxide decreases cytokine-induced endothelial activation. Nitric oxide selectively reduces endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest 96:60 -68, 1995
  39. Khan BV, Harrison DG, Olbrych MT, Alexander RW, Medford RM: Nitric oxide regulates vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 gene expression and redox-sensitive transcriptional events in human vascular endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:9114 -9119, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication March 16, 2000. Accepted for publication June 30, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. M.C. Brunini, A. C. Mendes-Ribeiro, J. C. Ellory, and G. E. Mann
Platelet nitric oxide synthesis in uremia and malnutrition: A role for L-arginine supplementation in vascular protection?
Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2007; 73(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. Park, J. I. Kim, Y. Ahn, A. J. Bonventre, and J. V. Bonventre
Testosterone Is Responsible for Enhanced Susceptibility of Males to Ischemic Renal Injury
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52282 - 52292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. Park, J.-Y. Byun, C. Kramers, J. I. Kim, P. L. Huang, and J. V. Bonventre
Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase Is an Important Contributor to Prolonged Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning in the Mouse Kidney
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 27256 - 27266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VOS, I. H. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOLES, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VOS, I. H. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOLES, J. A.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP