Abstract. Analgesic abuse is related to a specific form of
interstitialnephritis, but the exact nature of the causal agent remains
controversialand this has resulted in differences in regulation. In Flanders,
thefree sale of phenacetin was banned, but the consumption of othercombined
analgesics remained free. In New South Wales, phenacetinwas also banned, but
2 yr later the sales of all combined analgesicswere also prohibited. This
study compared the evolution of end-stagerenal disease as a result of
analgesic nephropathy (AN) in thesetwo high-endemic regions with different
legislation. In bothregions, the time trend of the age-specific incidence of
end-stagerenal disease as a result of AN is similar in the age group45 to 54
yr. In all age groups combined, the time trend of thepercentage of AN among
the patients admitted for renal replacementtherapy is also similar. This
finding does not support the hypothesisthat non-phenacetin mixed analgesics
play a significant rolein the occurrence of AN.
On the basis of clinical evidence, over-the-counter sales of
phenacetin-containinganalgesics have been legally prohibited in most
countries. Theepidemiologic studies that have attempted to confirm the causal
relationshipbetween regular analgesic intake and analgesic nephropathy (AN)
presenta number of limitations and potential biases
(1). A recent review
(2)concluded that despite
methodological flaws, these studies suggesta causal relationship between AN
and chronic intake of phenacetinbut no convincing evidence for a causal
relationship betweenchronic intake of non-phenacetin analgesics and AN.
However,the specific role of phenacetin remains a matter of controversy,and
renal toxicity has been attributed to paracetamol, one ofits metabolites, or
even to any non-phenacetin mixed analgesiccombination
(3,4).
A recent position paper of the National Kidney Foundation recommendedthat
the over-the-counter availability of analgesic mixtureswithout phenacetin
should cease (5). On
methodological groundsthe validity of the epidemiologic studies underlying
this recommendationhas been questioned
(6). However, the
recommendation of theposition paper was strongly influenced by the widely
disseminatedview that an isolated ban on phenacetin failed to control the
epidemicof AN in Australia and Belgium, whereas a later ban on all mixed
analgesicsin Australia seemed more successful
(5,7).
To settle this crucialissue, we examined the now available long-term data on
the evolutionof AN in Australia and Belgium.
The distribution of AN is uneven, and regions with high prevalencehave
been described, usually related to local factors
(8,9).
Thetime trend of the incidence in specific high-endemic regionsis more
likely to be sensitive to changes in the legislationon analgesics than data
based on larger registries includinglow-endemic regions. In Belgium, the
problem of analgesic nephropathyis largely limited to Flanders (population
5.6 million)
(9,10).
Wetherefore reviewed the consumption of popular analgesics inFlanders and
all relevant data on the time trend of the newcases of AN among the patients
who were admitted for renal replacementtherapy (RRT). When appropriate, the
results were compared withsimilar data obtained in New South Wales (NSW;
population 6million), a state of Australia with a comparable number of new
casesof AN.
Detailed data on the patients who had end-stage renal failureand who were
receiving RRT in the Flemish part of Belgium wereobtained from the European
Dialysis and Transplant AssociationEuropeanRenal Association
(EDTA-ERA) Registry. For the period between1973 and 1989, the mean response
rate of the Belgian centerswas 92% (range, 83 to 100%). From 1990 on, the
data were collectedby the Flemish Nephrology Association (NBVN), and the
retrievalrate approximates 100%. Data for NSW were retrieved from the
Australiaand New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry
(11).
Age-specific incidences for Flanders were calculated using thepopulation
data obtained from the National Institute of Statistics(Leuvenseweg 44, B1000
Brussels, Belgium). For Australia, age-specificincidences were obtained from
the ANZDATA Registry.
The detailed sales between 1965 and 1998 of Perdolan (Jansen-CilagNV,
Antwerp, Belgium), Mann (S.M.B. Laboratoria, Brussels, Belgium),and Witte
Kruis (S.M.B. Laboratoria), the three analgesic brandsmost popular in
Flanders, were obtained from IMS Belgium (Informations
Médicaleset Statistiques), an international
institution that collectssales data for the industry.
Trends of AN Occurrence
The following data were retrieved or calculated from the registrydata for
Flanders and when available for NSW. All of these dataconcern exclusively the
patients accepted for RRT:
Number and age distribution of new patients with ESRD admittedper year
and per million population, all primary renal diseases(PRD) included. As
more facilities for RRT progressively becameavailable, the number of new
patients admitted for treatmentincreased progressively. Until 1985, this
number increased atthe same pace in Flanders and in NSW; thereafter, the
increasewas faster in Flanders (Figure
1). In 1997, 80 patients permillion were admitted in NSW,
compared with 140 in Flanders.As shown in
Figure 2, this increase
resulted mainly from theincreased admission of elderly patients. In the
1970s, patientsolder than 65 rarely were admitted; presently, they make up
morethan half of those starting treatment in Flanders.
Numberof new AN patients admitted per year and per million
population.The time trend of the number of new AN patients must be
interpretedagainst the increasing number of patients with ESRD who are
acceptedfor treatment. In Flanders, the number of new AN patients has
remainedrelatively stable since the 1980s
(Figure 3), in contrast tothe
persistent increase in the number of admissions
(Figure 1).In NSW, however,
the increase in the acceptance rate ofnew patients
(Figure 1) was more limited,
and the number ofnew AN patients has declined since 1985
(Figure 3).
Age-specificincidence of new AN patients in selected sub-groupsof
age.This time-trend of the number of new AN patients isdifferentwhen
age subgroups are considered. In the age group45 to 54yr in Flanders, the
number of new AN patients has decreasedsince 1977; for the age group 55 to 64
yr, this decrease started10 years later; and in the age group 65 to 74 yr,
the numberof new AN patients continued to increase until recently
(Figure 4).For NSW, data on
these age subgroups are available onlysince 1980. For the age group 45 to 54
yr, the age-specificincidence of AN initially was higher than in Flanders.
From1984 on, the incidence became comparable, and the further decreasewas
identical in both regions (Figure
5).
Percentage of ANamong new ESRD patients admitted to RRT. Whenthe
number ofnew AN patients is expressed as a percentage ofthe total numberof
patients admitted to RRT (Figure
6), thedifference in timetrend between the age groups
(Figure 4) disappears.In all
agegroups, the highest percentage is observed in 1976to 1977 andthe
subsequent decline is similar. When overallpercentagesof AN are considered
irrespective of age, the trendwith timein Flanders and NSW is identical
(Figure 7).
Figure 1. Number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) admitted renal
replacement therapy (RRT) in Flanders and in New South Wales (NSW). (Data from
European Dialysis and Transplant AssociationEuropean Renal Association,
the Flemish Nephrology Association, and Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and
Transplant Registry.)
Figure 6. Number of AN patients expressed as percentage of all patients admitted for
RRT (data for Flanders). The time trend of the percentage is similar in all
age groups.
Figure 7. All age groups combined. Identical time trend of the percentage of AN in
Flanders and in NSW. Exclusion of diabetic patients in Flanders does not
significantly modify the trend of the curve.
Trends in Analgesic Composition and Consumption
In Flanders, the three most popular analgesic drugs were Mannand Witte
Kruis powders and Perdolan tablets
(10,12).
The changingcomposition of these three most popular analgesic drugs is
reportedin Table 1. Phenacetin
had been removed from Perdolan as earlyas in 1967. Phenacetin was removed
from Witte Kruis powdersin 1972 and from Mann powders in 1981. Warnings of
possiblerenal damage in case of prolonged use were put on the packagesin
1967 and in 1972, but their influence seems to have beenlimited. The
withdrawal of phenacetin thus has been progressive,and it started long before
the legal ban in 1987.
Table 1. Composition of the three most popular analgesics in Flanders
The mean number of doses of these three most popular analgesicssold per
year in Belgium is listed in Table
2. Although thesenumbers correspond to the total sales in
Belgium, the majoritywere sold in Flanders, where these products were
manufactured
(9,10).
Thesenumbers do not include the powders sold outside the pharmacies,which
was a common practice for Mann and Witte Kruis. Between1965 and 1971, more
than 70 million phenacetin-containing doseswere sold per year. The abrupt
decrease in phenacetin salesin 1972 and 1981 corresponds to the withdrawal of
phenacetinfrom Witte Kruis and Mann. The consumption of mixed analgesicswith
phenacetin then was shifted to mixed analgesics withoutphenacetin. Since the
change of Mann and Witte Kruis to themono formula in 1988, the sales of mixed
analgesics have remainedat 52 million doses per year. When the sales of only
these threemost popular analgesic mixtures are considered, these data
indicatethat the crucial dates for a decrease of the consumption of
phenacetinare 1972 and 1981. After the ban of phenacetin, the consumptionof
mixed analgesics persisted at a high level.
The main objective of this study was to test the assumptionthat the
incidence of AN was reduced to a greater extent inAustralia than in Belgium.
The major possible bias when usingregistry data to compare the incidence of
AN between countriesis the progressive change in the admission criteria. Two
solutionshave been proposed to circumvent this difficulty. The firstis based
on the assumption that below the age of 54 yr, no patientswith AN were denied
treatment, and the incidence of AN in thesepatients therefore has been
considered as indicating the realincidence of the disease
(13). Our data
(Figure 2) indicate,however,
that even in this younger age group the number of admissionshas increased
somewhat, suggesting that some changes in selectioncriteria could have
occurred. It is possible that when facilitieswere still limited, some
patients with behavioral problems,frequently observed among AN patients,
could have been deniedRRT. A major disadvantage of the restriction of the
analysisto younger patients, however, is the limited number of patients.This
results in an increased year-to-year variation, which makesevaluation of the
time trend difficult. The second solutionis to express the results as the
proportion of AN patients amongthe total group accepted for treatment. A
major objection isthat bias will occur if changes are made in the exclusion
criteriafor well-defined diseases, other than AN. The similarity inthe time
trend of the proportion of AN in all age groups
(Figure 6),however, makes
unlikely a relevant bias as a result of age-relateddiseases. An increase in
the number of diabetic patients admittedto RRT has been observed in most
countries and could resultin a decrease in the proportion of AN patients.
However, exclusionof diabetics from the calculation only marginally increases
thepercentage of AN in the recent years, as shown for Flandersin
Figure 7. The same applies to
NSW (data not shown). For ourcomparison between regions, the importance of
this bias is limitedfurther, as the number of diabetic patients admitted to
RRTincreased in Flanders as well as in NSW and therefore the porportionof AN
is modified in the same way. Whatever the parameter used,age-specific
incidence of AN in the age group 45 to 54 yr
(Figure 5)or proportion of AN
patients (Figure 7), the
incidence ofAN was found to decline at the same rate in Flanders and in
NSW.
Earlier studies concluded that the phenacetin ban in Belgiumand Australia
had no effect on the incidence of AN
(5). Thediscrepancy between
our findings and those of others is explainedby the criteria used to estimate
success or failure. The validityof the conclusion will depend on three
factors: (1) adequacyof the parameter used to estimate the time
trend, (2) correctestimation of the time at which the consumption of the
abuseddrug(s) changed, and (3) correct estimation of the time interval
betweenwithdrawal of the drug and the expected effect on the time trendof
AN.
In Belgium, the conclusion that analgesic nephropathy did notdecrease
significantly was based on a comparison between ANprevalence in the dialysis
units in 1982, 1984, and 1990
(12,14).
Theabsence of improvement in the prevalence of AN in Belgium isstill
mentioned in a recent review as indicating the failureof phenacetin
withdrawal (4). Prevalence of
AN among dialysispatients, however, cannot be considered an adequate
parameter,as it not only will reflect a change in the incidence with a
considerabledelay but also will be biased by the transplantation policy.In
the early years, patients from the younger age group werepreferentially
selected for transplantation, and as the incidenceof AN is lower below 40 yr
of age, this will increase the prevalenceof AN among those remaining in
dialysis. In addition, data indicatethat AN patients have been discriminated
against in selectionfor transplantation
(12,15).
The importance of this bias isillustrated by the fact that the prevalence of
AN in dialysiscan be nearly twice as high as the prevalence calculated onthe
total number of survivors with RRT (including the patientswith a functioning
transplant) (12). Similar
differences werereported for Switzerland, Austria, and Germany
(10).
A recent review mentioned that the "frequency" of AN startedto
decrease in Belgium in 1992 only and in Australia in 1985
(3).The authors clearly are
referring to the decline in the numberof AN patients admitted to RRT
(Figure 3). As this number is
biasedby the increased admission to RRT
(Figure 1), it is not suitable
forestimating a change in incidence of the disease.
In Australia, interpretation of the data is more difficult thanin Belgium.
This is due to a short time interval of only 2 yrbetween the legal ban on
phenacetin and on all mixed analgesics,making it difficult or even impossible
to assess the respectiveinfluences of the two measures
(16). In Australia, phenacetin
waslegally banned in 1977, but phenacetin had been withdrawn frommany
analgesics much earlier. The most frequently abused powderswere Vincents and
Bex, from which phenacetin was removed in1967 and 1976, respectively
(17,18,19).
We have no quantitativedata on the consumption of these powders, but 1967 and
1976can be considered as crucial dates for a decrease of phenacetin
consumptionamong addicts. The absence of a decline in the percentage ofAN
among the Australian patients who started RRT between 1971and 1978 was
interpreted as indicating a failure of the phenacetinwithdrawal
(20). Obviously, it was the
absence of an immediatedecrease in the incidence of ESRD as a result of AN
that wasinterpreted as a failure of the phenacetin ban. With the longterm
datanow available, it is clear that even in the younger age groups,the first
change in the trend of the incidence of AN can beobserved only several years
after the withdrawal of phenacetinand the proportion of AN among patients
starting dialysis becomesnegligible only after 20 yr or more
(Figure 6). In the olderage
groups, this decrease is even slower. This is consistentwith the view that
cessation of phenacetin intake in patientswith reduced renal function has not
led to a reversal but onlyto a slowing of the progression to terminal renal
failure. Brunnerand Selwood
(21) concluded on the basis of
EDTA Registry datathat it took some 20 yr after withdrawal of phenacetin for
ANto disappear as a cause of ESRD. Our data indicate that in countriessuch
as Belgium, where a high proportion of elderly patientsare accepted for
treatment, this interval could even be longer.
On the basis of a short-term study that involved a limited numberof
patients who were not yet in the end stage of their nephropathy,Nanra et
al. (18) claimed that
withdrawal of phenacetin hadfailed to reduce the incidence of AN. They
compared the incidenceof renal insufficiency in patients who had taken Bex
and Vincentspowders between 1967 and 1976. At that time, Bex still contained
phenacetinand Vincents did not. Renal insufficiency, defined by a serum
creatinineexceeding 0.11 mmol/L, was found in 64.7% of the Bex abusers,
comparedwith 57.1% in the Vincents abusers. Here also, the absence ofa rapid
improvement in renal function was interpreted as showingthe failure of the
withdrawal of phenacetin (19).
It can beconcluded that the claim for the failure of the phenacetin
withdrawalin Australia is not supported by convincing data. On the basisof
the Australian data, the progressive disappearance of ANin the long run could
as well be due to the phenacetin withdrawalas to the withdrawal of combined
analgesics.
In Australia, the most significant decrease in phenacetin consumptionby
addicts can be estimated to have occurred in 1967 and 1976and in Flanders in
1972 and 1981. In contrast to Australia,where all mixed analgesics have been
prohibited since 1979,the decrease of phenacetin consumption in Belgium was
largelycompensated by an increase in the consumption of mixed analgesics
withoutphenacetin. This persisting high consumption of mixed analgesicsdid
not preclude a similar decrease with time of the frequencyof AN in Flanders
and in NSW. These findings make unlikely asignificant role of
non-phenacetin-mixed analgesics in the genesisof AN.
Acknowledgments
The assistance of the following persons is gratefully acknowledged:Prof.
F. Valderrabano, Chairman of the Registration Committee,kindly allowed us to
use the EDTA-ERA Registry data, and thehelp of Dr. Elisabeth Jones (Research
Officer of the Registry)was invaluable in retrieving Registry data on
different subgroupsof patients; Dr. Mario Schurgers, Chairman of the Dutch
speakingSociety of Nephrology (NBVN), kindly gave us access to the registry
dataand was helpful in providing data on age subgroups; Lee Excell,Project
Manager of the ANZDATA Registry, was very helpful inthe retrieval and
updating of the Australian data; Dr. C. DeLa Porte, Medical Director of
Janssen Cilag Belgium N.V., madethe IMS sales data available.
The authors are much indebted to Prof. Lothar Heinemann (Centerfor
Epidemiology and Health Research [ZEG], Berlin, Germany,who critically
reviewed and discussed the epidemiologic aspectsof the manuscript. Karin
Thiele and Dr. N. Taylor were helpfulin reviewing the text.
McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Wong-Ho C, Blot WJ: Analgesic use and
chronic renal failure: A critical review of the epidemiologic literature.
Kidney Int 54:679
-686, 1998[Medline]
Delzell E, Shapiro S: A review of epidemiologic studies of
nonnarcotic analgesics and chronic renal disease. Medicine
(Balt) 77:102
-121, 1998[Medline]
De Broe ME, Elseviers MM: Analgesic nephropathy. N Engl
J Med 338:446
-452, 1998[Free Full Text]
Henrich WL, Agodoa LE, Barrett B, Bennett WB, Blantz RC, Buckalew
VM, D'Agati VD, De Broe ME, Duggin GG, Eknoyan G, Elseviers MM, Gomez RA,
Matzke GR, Porter GA, Sabatini S, Stoff J, Striker GE, Winchester JF: National
Kidney Foundation Position Paper. Analgesics and the kidney: Summary and
recommendations to the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Kidney
Foundation from an Ad Hoc Committee of the National Kidney Foundation.
Am J Kidney Dis 27:162
-165, 1996[Medline]
Delzell E, Shapiro S: Commentary on the National Kidney Foundation
Position Paper on Analgesics and the Kidney. Am J Kidney
Dis 28: 783-785,1996[Medline]
Henrich WL: Over-the-counter analgesics and kidney disease [Reply
to letter]. Am J Kidney Dis 27:916
-918, 1996
Grimlund K: Phenacetin and renal damage at a Swedish factory.
Acta Med Scand 174[Suppl 405]:1
-26, 1963
Vanherweghem JL, Even-Adin D: Epidemiology of analgesic nephropathy
in Belgium. Clin Nephrol 17:129
-133, 1982[Medline]
Elseviers M: 1994 Epidemiology of analgesic nephropathy. In:
Thesis Departement Geneeskunde, Antwerp, Belgium,
Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, 1994
Disney APS, editor: ANZDATA Reports: Australia and New
Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Adelaide, South
Australia
Elseviers MM, De Broe ME: Analgesic nephropathy in Belgium is
related to the sales of particular analgesic mixtures. Nephrol Dial
Transplant 9:41
-46, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Stewart JH, McCredie M, Disney APS, Mathew TH: Trends in incidence
of end-stage renal failure in Australia, 1972-1991. Nephrol Dial
Transplant 9:1377
-1382, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Noels LM, Elseviers MM, De Broe ME: Impact of legislative measures
on the sales of analgesics and the subsequent prevalence of analgesic
nephropathy: A comparative study in France, Sweden and Belgium.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:167
-174, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schwarz A, Offerman G, Keller F: Analgesic nephropathy and renal
transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant7
: 427-432,1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Stewart JH: Analgesic abuse and renal failure in Australasia.
Kidney Int 13:72
-78, 1978[Medline]
Nanra RS, Stuart-Taylor J, De Leon H, White KH: Analgesic
nephropathy: Etiology, clinical syndrome, and clinicopathologic correlations
in Australia. Kidney Int 13:79
-92, 1978[Medline]
Kincaid-Smith P: Analgesic nephropathy. Kidney
Int 13: 1-4,1978[Medline]
Kincaid-Smith P: Analgesic abuse and the kidney. Kidney
Int 17: 250-260,1980[Medline]
Brunner FP, Selwood NH: End-stage renal failure due to analgesic
nephropathy, its changing pattern and cardiovascular mortality.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:1371
-1376, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication June 5, 2000.
Accepted for publication August 10, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:
S. H. Chang, T. H. Mathew, and S. P. McDonald Analgesic Nephropathy and Renal Replacement Therapy in Australia: Trends, Comorbidities and Outcomes
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2008;
3(3):
768 - 776.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
P. Michielsen In memoriam 'analgesic nephropathy' (circa 1972-2006)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
April 1, 2007;
22(4):
999 - 1001.
[Full Text][PDF]
M. J. Mihatsch, B. Khanlari, and F. P. Brunner Obituary to analgesic nephropathy--an autopsy study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
November 1, 2006;
21(11):
3139 - 3145.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
I. Pinter, J. Matyus, Z. Czegany, J. Harsanyi, M. Homoki, M. Kassai, E. Kiss, I. Kiss, E. Ladanyi, L. Locsey, et al. Analgesic nephropathy in Hungary: the HANS study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
April 1, 2004;
19(4):
840 - 843.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
B. Mackinnon, M. Boulton-Jones, and K. McLaughlin Analgesic-associated nephropathy in the West of Scotland: a 12-year observational study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
September 1, 2003;
18(9):
1800 - 1805.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
B. Stengel, S. Billon, P. C.W. van Dijk, K. J. Jager, F. W. Dekker, K. Simpson, and J. D. Briggs Trends in the incidence of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease in Europe, 1990-1999
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
September 1, 2003;
18(9):
1824 - 1833.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
W. A. Gahl, J. G. Thoene, and J. A. Schneider Cystinosis
N. Engl. J. Med.,
July 11, 2002;
347(2):
111 - 121.
[Full Text][PDF]