Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRINSEN, B. H. C. M. T.
Right arrow Articles by RABELINK, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PRINSEN, B. H. C. M. T.
Right arrow Articles by RABELINK, T. J.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1017-1025, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

Transferrin Synthesis Is Increased in Nephrotic Patients Insufficiently to Replace Urinary Losses

BERTHIL H. C. M. T. PRINSEN*,{dagger},{ddagger}, MONIQUE G. M. DE SAIN-VAN DER VELDEN{ddagger}, GEORGE A. KAYSEN§, HELMA W. H. C. STRAVER{ddagger}, HERMAN J. M. VAN RIJN{dagger}, FRANS STELLAARD||, RUUD BERGER{ddagger} and TON J. RABELINK*

* Department of Vascular Medicine and Metabolism, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
§ Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California-Davis, Davis, and Department of Veterans Affairs Northern California System of Clinics, Mather, California
|| Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr. Monique G. M. de Sain-van der Velden, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Metabolic Diseases, H.P. KC-02.069.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-2504294; Fax: 31-30-2504295; E-mail: M.G.deSain{at}lab.azu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. The urinary loss of transferrin is sufficient to reduce plasma transferrin concentrations in the nephrotic syndrome. Hypotransferrinemia may lead to iron loss and microcytic anemia. The mechanism responsible for the hypotransferrinemia in the nephrotic syndrome is, however, unknown. In the present study, synthesis rate of transferrin was measured in vivo in nephrotic patients (n = 7) compared with control subjects (n = 6) using L-[1-13C]-valine. Plasma transferrin and iron concentration in the patients were significantly lower than in control subjects (transferrin, 1.39 ± 0.08 versus 2.57 ± 0.11 g/L, P < 0.0001; iron, 10.2 ± 0.8 versus 21.1 ± 4.5 µmol/L, P = 0.02). Furthermore, albuminuria correlated with transferrinuria (r2 = 0.901, P = 0.001). The absolute synthesis rate of transferrin was increased in the patients (10.0 ± 1.1 versus 7.4 ± 0.7 mg/kg per d, P = 0.07), although this value failed to achieve significance. C-reactive protein, plasma iron, and proteinuria did not correlate with transferrin synthesis. In contrast, transferrin synthesis correlated with albumin synthesis (r2 = 0.648, P = 0.03; n = 7). The present study indicates that increased transferrin synthesis occurs in nephrotic patients but is insufficient to compensate for urinary losses. Because, overall, no significant relationship was found between transferrin synthesis and either C-reactive protein or iron, it is unlikely that inflammation suppresses or that iron deficiency stimulates increased transferrin synthesis in these patients. The correlation between transferrin synthesis and albumin synthesis suggests that transferrin synthesis is a component of a general response in hepatic protein synthesis in the nephrotic syndrome. This suggests that a therapeutic approach to maximize plasma transferrin concentrations in nephrotic patients should be aimed primarily at reducing urinary protein excretion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Proteinuria is one of the hallmarks of the nephrotic syndrome. Although albumin is the most commonly measured urinary protein, other proteins, including transferrin, are also lost into the urine. Serum transferrin levels are also decreased in nephrotic patients (1,2,3). Transferrin is a negative acute-phase protein and is the most important glycoprotein for transport of iron between sites of absorption, storage, and use in the human body. Transferrin is synthesized mainly in the liver (4, 5), although small amounts of transferrin are also synthesized in testis, spleen, kidney (6), and brain (7). It is an 80-kD glycoprotein with 2 N-linked carbohydrate chains. The protein has a half-life of 8 to 12 d and has the capacity to bind two ferric atoms (8,9,10,11). During childhood and in healthy adults, plasma transferrin concentrations range between 2 and 4 g/L and are not strongly influenced by age and gender (12, 13). Genetic hypotransferrinemia and atransferrinemia are extremely rare (14).

Hypotransferrinemia in the nephrotic syndrome may induce low plasma iron concentrations that eventually result in microcytic anemia (15, 16), although the urinary loss of erythropoietin may also be significant as a cause of anemia in this patient population (17, 18). The pathophysiologic mechanism responsible for the decreased plasma transferrin concentration in the nephrotic syndrome is poorly understood. Transferrin synthesis may be modulated as a component of the acute-phase cascade (19) or as a consequence of iron deficiency (6). Furthermore, malnutrition causes downregulation of hepatic transferrin gene expression, resulting in decreased synthesis (20, 21). Inflammation, iron deficiency, and malnutrition are often found in the nephrotic syndrome (22). Jensen et al. (23), using 125I-labeling studies, measured transferrin kinetics in eight patients with the nephrotic syndrome. Both synthesis rate (extrapolated from this indirect measurement of transferrin turnover) and transferrin fractional catabolic rate were increased. This was confirmed by Kaysen et al. (22), who studied transferrin kinetics in rats with Heymann nephritis. However, these radioactive kinetic studies may not represent the physiologic situation, as the studied protein is isolated, labeled, and reinjected. Labeling of the protein may alter its conformation; thus, kinetic studies that use stable isotopes for the direct evaluation of endogenously synthesized protein have an advantage over studies that use exogenous tracers.

The present study was undertaken to determine directly whether transferrin synthesis was increased in the nephrotic syndrome using endogenous labeling with 13C-valine. We further aimed to determine potential mechanisms that lead to the hypotransferrinemia.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
Seven patients (five males, two females) were recruited for this study from the renal division of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Seven nephrotic patients and six control subjects were studied. Six of seven patients, among them five men, had membranous glomerulonephritis. One female patient was known to have focal glomerulonephritis. The clinical data of the patients and control subjects are shown in Table 1. A dietician prescribed a diet containing 0.8 g protein/kg body wt per d and 100 mmol of sodium/d for at least 2 wk before starting the infusion protocol. Besides diuretics, none of them received medication, or medication was stopped at least 2 wk before the infusion study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinical data of the nephrotic patients and the control subjectsa
 

Control studies were done in six healthy subjects (four males, two females) who were on a similar diet as the nephrotic syndrome patients. One d before the infusion protocol the subjects collected a 24 h urine sample that was analyzed for urea, creatinine, protein, transferrin, iron and albumin. All patients and volunteers agreed to participate after signing an informed consent form, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of Human Rights. The Institutional Ethical Committee for studies in humans approved this study.

Materials
L-[1-13C]-valine (isotope mole fraction > 0.99; Mass Trace, Woburn, MA) was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline and sterilized through a 0.22-µm filter. Cyanogen bromide (CNBr)-Sepharose 4B was from Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden). Human antitransferrin antibody was from Dade Behring (Marburg, Germany). O-phenylenediamine (OPDA) was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). N-methyl-N-(tertiair-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) and pyridine were from Pierce (Rockford, IL). All other chemicals were obtained from Riedel de Haën (Seelze, Germany).

Infusion Protocol
The subjects came to the research unit in the morning after a 12-h fast. Two intravenous cannulas were placed for blood sampling and infusion of the labeled valine. No food was given during the tracer infusion, and the subjects were allowed only to drink water.

At baseline (t = 0), a priming dose of 15 µmol/kg L-[1-13C]-valine was administered intravenously in 2 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 15 µmol/kg per h L-[1-13C]-valine during 6 h. Blood samples were taken in heparin-containing and ethylenediamine-tetraacetate-containing tubes from the contralateral arm at t = 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 270, 300, 330, and 360 min. Samples were kept on ice until plasma was separated by centrifugation (20 min, 2000 x g, 4°C).

Preinfusion Measurements
Preinfusion plasma and urinary concentrations of transferrin were measured using a routine nephelometric assay (Dade Behring). Urinary iron was measured using the Keberle method (24).

Plasma albumin, total protein, and iron were measured with standard laboratory methods on a Vitros 950 (Johnson & Johnson, Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY). Soluble transferrin receptor was measured using an Immunometric assay (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland). C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured using an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (Detectionlimit 0.2 µg/ml; Hemagen Diagnostics, Waltham, MA). Urinary urea, urinary creatinine, protein-uria, and albuminuria were measured with standard laboratory methods on a Hitachi 911 (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). The colloid osmotic pressure (COP) was measured using a 4400 colloid osmometer (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT).

Isolation and Purification of Transferrin from Plasma
From each sampling point, transferrin was purified by affinity chromatography according to van Eijk et al. (25) with some slight modifications. One ml of human antitransferrin antibody was coupled to 7 ml of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B. Sepharose 4B activation was prepared according to the instructions manual. In short, 2 g of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B was suspended in 15 ml of 1 mM ice-cold HCl. After centrifugation (10 min, 1750 x g, 4°C), which was repeated each wash step, the gel was washed four times with 1 mM HCl and subsequently washed twice with 0.1 M Borate buffer (pH 8.5) containing 0.5 M NaCl (coupling buffer). After the supernatant was removed, 1 ml of human antitransferrin antibody was diluted 15 times in coupling buffer and added to the activated gel before an overnight incubation. The remaining active groups were blocked with 0.2 M glycine (pH 8.0) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by a washout procedure. The uncoupled human antitransferrin was washed out three times alternately with a high-pH buffer (0.1 M Borate buffer [pH 8.5] containing 1.0 M NaCl) and a low-pH buffer (0.1 M acetate buffer [pH 4.0] containing 1.0 M NaCl). Finally, the high- and low-wash buffers were washed out twice with 0.1 M Borate buffer (pH 8.5) containing 0.5 M NaCl. The gel was stored for a maximum of 4 wk at 4°C.

Ethylenediaminetetraacetate plasma containing approximately 400 µg of transferrin was diluted twice with 0.2 M Na2HPO4 containing 1.0 M NaCl. The diluted plasma sample was applied to a column containing 2 ml of gel suspension. Unbound substances were washed away with 30 ml of 0.1 M phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 8.5) containing 0.5 M NaCl. The sample was eluted in 7 ml of phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 2.8) containing 0.5 M NaCl and dried under N2 at 45°C, followed by hydrolysis in 6 M HCl at 110°C for 24 h (26). The released amino acids were purified by cation exchange chromatography (AG-50W-X8; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and dried under N2 at 50°C. Derivatization was done according to the method of Husek (27).

Isolation and Purification of Albumin
Albumin was isolated according to the method of Korner and Debro (28). In short, 0.5 ml of heparin plasma was deproteinized with 0.5 ml 20% trichloric acid. After centrifugation (10 min, 1750 x g, room temperature), the pellet was dissolved in 3 ml of ethanol, after which an aliquot of the supernatant was used to monitor protein purity and identification using a 4 to 15% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfatephastgel. To remove free amino acids, a second aliquot of the ethanolic protein solution, containing 500 µg of protein, was evaporated under N2 at 45°C. The dried residue was redissolved in 1 ml of 0.3 M NaOH at 37°C for 30 min and cooled to room temperature. After a 5-min ice-incubation step, albumin was reprecipitated with 1 ml of 2 M HClO4 at 4°C and, subsequently, twice with 1 ml of 0.2 M HClO4 at 4°C before hydrolysis, cation exchange, and derivatization as described above.

Conversion of Valine into {alpha}-Keto-Isovaleric Acid
A standard curve (between 0 and 20% enrichment), prepared by enzymatic conversion of L-[1-13C]-valine into {alpha}-keto-isovaleric acid ({alpha}-KIV), was used. To each standard (100 µg), 500 µl of Tris-buffer (1.0 M [pH 7.7]) and 50 µl of L-amino acid oxidase (6 mg/ml in Tris buffer, freshly prepared) were added. The standards were incubated for 90 min at 37°C. After incubation, 450 µl of H2O was added and the standards were derivatized with 1 ml of OPDA (20 mg/ml in 4 M HCl, freshly prepared) for 1 h at 90°C, cooled to room temperature in the dark, and extracted twice with 2 ml of ethylacetate. The ethylacetate phase was dehydrated with Na2SO4, transferred to new tubes, and dried under N2 at 40°C. Next, 100 µl of CHCl3 was added and dried under N2 at 40°C. Finally, the samples were derivatized with 50 µl of MTBSTFA:pyridine (3:1) for 15 min at room temperature.

Isolation of {alpha}-KIV from Plasma
{alpha}-KIV was isolated from plasma according to the method of Rocchicciolo et al. (29) with some slight modifications. In short, 4 ml of absolute ethanol was added to 500 µl of plasma. After centrifugation (20 min, 1750 x g, 4°C), the supernatant was removed and dried under N2 at 50°C. One ml of H2O was added, and the samples were derivatized with 1 ml of OPDA for 1 h at 90°C, cooled to room temperature, extracted twice with ethylacetate, and dried. Next, 100 µl of CHCl3 was added and the samples were dried again followed by derivatization with MTBSTFA:pyridine (3:1) as described above.

Measurement of Stable Isotope Enrichment
The O-t-butyldimethylsilyl-quinoxalinol derivatives of KIV were prepared, based on the procedure of Rocchicciolo et al. (29). Positive chemical ionization was used to measure the ions at m/z 245/246 for plasma [1-13C]-KIV enrichment using electron impact. KIV enrichment was measured by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on a Hewlett-Packard HP 5890 type II gas chromatograph (Palo Alto, CA) interfaced to an HP 5989B mass spectrometer. The gas chromatograph was equipped with a coating CP Sil 19CB capillary column (Chrompack, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands). The injection (2 µl) was performed in the split mode (1:20). The flow rate of the carrier gas (helium) was 1 ml/min. The injector temperature was 240°C, and the oven temperature was programmed starting at 210°C for 1 min, then increased from 210°C to 280°C at 25°C/min and held at 280°C for 3 min. The KIV eluted at 2.6 min. Samples were measured in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The source and the quadrupole temperature were 250°C and 150°C, respectively.

Amino acids isolated from hydrolysates of transferrin and albumin (m/z 44/45) were analyzed as their N(O,S)-methoxycarbonyl methyl ester derivative by gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) on a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph, equipped with a CuO combustion oven and interfaced to a DELTA S isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finningan-MAT, Bremen, Germany) as described by Reijngoud et al. (30). The GC/MS measurements were performed in duplicate, whereas the GC/C/IRMS measurements were performed only once.

Model and Calculations
Transferrin and albumin fractional synthesis rate (FSR; expressed as %/d) were calculated using a linear regression model. The following standard equation was used:

(1)

PEt6 — PEt3 is the increase in enrichment of transferrin-bound [1-13C]-valine over the time period 3 to 6 h (t6 — t3) of the infusion, and Epl is the steady-state plasma tracer/tracee ratio (%) of KIV. In this calculation, the plateau enrichment of KIV in plasma is assumed to represent the enrichment of the intrahepatic valine pool from which transferrin is synthesized.

To determine kinetics of several proteins, a mono-exponential can also be used, as described below:

(2)

A(t) is the tracer/tracee ratio (%) of valine at time t (in hours), Ap is the steady-state plasma tracer/tracee ratio (%) of KIV, d is the delay time, and k represents the FSR of the protein. Calculations were done using GraphPad Prism 2.0 software (San Diego, CA).

Comparison of both equations used for calculating protein kinetics, showed an unreliable equation for transferrin kinetics (y = 0.67x + 4.17) in contrast to albumin kinetics (y = 1.03x + 17.3). The lack of a mono-exponential model for studying transferrin kinetics is probably due to the enormous delay (±3 h) or to a too low enrichment of L-[1-13C]-valine in transferrin in the first 3 h of the study protocol. Therefore, we used equation 1 to determine kinetics of both proteins.

The absolute synthesis rate (ASR), which is the amount of protein synthesized per day, was calculated as the product of the FSR and the plasma pool (plasma volume x plasma concentration). Plasma volume was determined using Evans blue as described previously (31). To adjust for different body weights, these quantities are expressed per kilogram of body weight.

Statistical Analyses
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The significance of differences was assessed by t test. If normality test or equal variance test failed, a Mann-Whitney rank sum test was performed. Correlations were performed by linear regression analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baseline Data
The plasma values of total protein, COP, albumin, transferrin, iron, soluble transferrin receptor, CRP, and plasma volume in nephrotic patients and control subjects are shown in Table 2. Total protein, COP, albumin, transferrin, and iron are significantly different between both groups. Total protein, albumin, and COP are significantly decreased in nephrotic patients compared with control subjects (total protein, 45.5 ± 1.5 versus 68.2 ± 1.9 g/L, P < 0.0001; COP, 11.2 ± 0.4 versus 25.2 ± 0.4 mmHg, P < 0.0001; albumin, 22.3 ± 0.7 versus 38.2 ± 0.7 g/L, P < 0.0001). Plasma transferrin and plasma iron values are also significantly decreased in nephrotic patients compared with control subjects (transferrin, 1.39 ± 0.08 versus 2.57 ± 0.11 g/L, P < 0.0001; iron, 10.2 ± 0.8 versus 21.1 ± 4.5 µmol/L, P = 0.02). No significant difference is found in the soluble transferrin receptor, plasma CRP values, and plasma volumes in both groups (soluble transferrin receptor, 1.93 ± 0.28 versus 1.74 ± 0.14 mg/L; CRP, 3.6 ± 1.4 versus 3.5 ± 1.5 µg/ml; plasma volumes, 42 ± 2 versus 39 ± 2 ml/kg).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Biochemical parameters in plasma from nephrotic patients and control subjectsa
 

Proteinuria, albuminuria, transferrinuria, and urinary iron loss in nephrotic patients are shown in Table 3. Mean proteinuria in the nephrotic patients is 12.0 ± 2.3 g/d (range, 6.1 to 23.2 g/d). The loss of albumin and transferrin is significantly different between nephrotic patients and control subjects (albumin, 110.7 ± 16.4 mg/kg per d, P < 0.001; transferrin, 9.7 ± 1.6 mg/kg per d, P < 0.001). Urinary iron concentration is significantly higher in the patient group (4 ± 1 versus 1 ± 0 µmol/L, P < 0.001). A strong correlation is observed between the loss of albumin and transferrin in urine both expressed in g/d (r2 = 0.901, P = 0.001; Figure 1) and both expressed in g/L (r2 = 0.809, P = 0.006). Furthermore, strong correlations are found between proteinuria and transferrinuria (r2 = 0.887, P = 0.002) and between transferrinuria and urinary iron (r2 = 0.761, P = 0.01) in nephrotic patients. Creatinine clearance (86 ± 7 versus 125 ± 8 ml/min per m2, P < 0.001) is significantly decreased in the nephrotic patients. No significant difference is found for urinary urea in both groups (289 ± 37 versus 364 ± 40 mmol/d; Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Biochemical parameters in urine from patients and control subjects
 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between transferrinuria (g/day) and albuminuria (g/day) in nephrotic patients (n = 7). The 95% confidence limits of the whole group are shown on either side of the regression line (y = 9.92x + 1.20, r2 = 0.901).

 

Isolation of Transferrin from Plasma
Figure 2 shows the elution pattern of the isolated transferrin. The purity of eluted transferrin peak is checked by a 7.5% homogeneous sodium dodecyl sulfate phastgel (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) (Figure 3). Different fractions in the elution peak (lanes 3 to 6) show one band at approximately 80 kD and run at the same size as commercially available transferrin (lane 7). In addition, no contamination with albumin is found in lanes 3 to 6. The transferrin fractions (21,22,23,24) were pooled, hydrolyzed, and derivatized as described in the Materials and Methods section.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Elution pattern of purified transferrin using cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B. [UNK], 1 ml fraction.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. A 7.5% homogeneous sodium dodecyl sulfate phastgel. Lane 1, fraction 3; lane 2, fraction 20; lane 3, fraction 21; lane 4, fraction 22; lane 5, fraction 23; lane 6, fraction 24; lane 7, human transferrin standard (100 µg/ml); lane 8, bovine serum albumin standard (100 µg/ml).

 

Synthesis Rate of Transferrin in Nephrotic Patients and in Control Subjects
Transferrin kinetics in nephrotic patients and control subjects are shown in Table 4. The ASR of transferrin in the patient group tends to be higher compared with control subjects (10.0 ± 1.1 versus 7.4 ± 0.7 mg/kg per d; Figure 4), although statistical significance is not reached (P = 0.07). FSR of transferrin is, however, significantly higher in the patients compared with control subjects (17.3 ± 1.4 versus 7.4 ± 0.6%/d, P < 0.0001). The wide variation in both groups, however, is striking. Two patients (5 and 7) have lower ASR values (7.1 and 6.2 mg/kg per d, respectively) compared with the mean value in the control group. Both patients also have the lowest FSR (12.7 and 14.6%/d), although these FSR values are twice as high as those in control subjects. The same two patients also have the lowest creatinine clearance (67 and 62 ml/min per m2). Furthermore, patient 7 has the highest CRP value and patient 5 has the third highest CRP value. With the exclusion of these two patients from the group (n = 5), the difference in ASR between the nephrotic patients and control subjects was highly significant (P = 0.007).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Kinetics of transferrin and albumina
 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Box plots showing the absolute synthesis rate (ASR, mg/kg per d) of transferrin in both patients (n = 7) and control subjects (n = 6). Shown are the mean (dotted line), median (solid line), and range (vertical bars).

 

Synthesis Rate of Albumin in Nephrotic Patients and in Control Subjects
Albumin kinetics in nephrotic patients and control subjects are shown in Table 4. The ASR of albumin in the patient group is significantly higher compared with control subjects (240.3 ± 26.3 versus 105.3 ± 12.2 mg/kg per d, P = 0.0012). Furthermore, FSR of albumin is also significantly higher in the patients compared with control subjects (25.7 ± 1.8 versus 7.2 ± 1.0%/d, P < 0.0001).

Correlations
Considering the data in control subjects and patients together, several parameters are tested. Transferrin synthesis rates do not correlate with plasma transferrin (r2 = 0.183, n = 13), plasma albumin (r2 = 0.241, n = 13), or COP (r2 = 0.243, n = 13). Within the patient group (n = 7), the transferrin synthesis rate did not significantly correlate with plasma iron (r2 = 0.116), plasma CRP (r2 = 0.136), transferrinuria (r2 = 0.047), urinary iron (r2 = 0.001), and proteinuria (r2 = 0.074). Exclusion of patients 5 and 7 also reveals no significant correlation between ASR of transferrin and CRP (r2 = 0.128, n = 5). Furthermore, in the patient group (n = 7), no correlation was found between albumin synthesis rate and CRP (r2 = 0.005). There was a positive correlation between the synthesis rate for transferrin and albumin in the patient group (r2 = 0.648, P = 0.03, n = 7) and in the whole group (r2 = 0.631, P = 0.0012, n = 13).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Urinary albumin excretion, as well as urinary transferrin excretion, is often observed in the nephrotic syndrome (1). In the present study, a strong correlation was found between albuminuria and transferrinuria (r2 = 0.901, P = 0.001), which is in agreement with the study by Howard et al. (32). This indicates that an increase in proteinuria directly reflects transferrinuria. The urinary loss of protein is sufficient to reduce plasma transferrin levels and may lead to iron loss and microcytic anemia.

In the present study, using stable isotopes, we showed that transferrin synthesis in nephrotic patients tended to be increased. Transferrin synthesis was increased 1.3-fold compared with control subjects, although statistical significance was not reached (10.0 ± 1.1 versus 7.4 ± 0.7 mg/kg per d, P = 0.07). The failure to reach statistical significance may be due to the wide variation in transferrin synthesis rate in both groups (Figure 4) and the low number of participants in both groups. In the present study, patients and control subjects were not matched for age. Although there is no strong effect of age on plasma transferrin concentration (12,13), no data are available on its effect of age on transferrin synthesis directly. The wide variation in transferrin synthesis rate within our control subjects (range, 5.0 to 9.0 mg/kg per d) was also reported by others (22,23,33,34,35). Two patients (5 and 7) had lower ASR values of transferrin (7.1 and 6.2 mg/kg per d) compared with the mean value in the control group and also had two of the lowest three albumin synthesis rates (169.7 and 187.6 mg/kg per d). The same two patients also had two of the highest three CRP values. Furthermore, both patients also had the lowest creatinine index (an index for muscle mass; 0.79 and 0.88, respectively). The reduction in muscle mass indicates that both patients are not well nourished. Because inflammation and malnutrition affect transferrin synthesis (20,36), this might suggest that the failure of these two patients to increase transferrin synthesis to a greater extent might have been a reflection of an underlying inflammatory event or that malnutrition prevents this response. Exclusion of both patients from the group (n = 5) revealed a significant difference in transferrin synthesis rate between the nephrotic patients and control subjects (P = 0.007). The increase in transferrin synthesis rate in five of seven nephrotic patients is not sufficient to compensate the low plasma transferrin concentrations as shown in this study (1.48 ± 0.08 versus 2.57 ± 0.11 g/L, P < 0.0001). In general, this seems to be what is observed with regard to other liver-derived proteins that are lost into the urine in the nephrotic syndrome. Although albumin synthesis rate is increased, it clearly does not increase plasma albumin levels to normal (31).

For therapeutic reasons, the mechanisms of hypotransferrinemia and the insufficient compensation by synthesis are of relevance. Transferrin is regulated by several control mechanisms. Iron depletion, proteinuria, inflammation, and malnutrition reduce plasma transferrin concentrations. The stimulus for increased transferrin synthesis in the nephrotic syndrome and its regulation are not known.

Our data suggest that iron depletion is not a main stimulus for transferrin synthesis in the nephrotic patients, as no significant correlation was found between plasma iron concentration and transferrin synthesis rate in nephrotic patients (r2 = 0.116, n = 7). This is in accordance with the animal studies of Kaysen et al. (22), who described that both transferrin mRNA and transferrin gene transcription were increased in Heymann nephritis and Nagase analbuminemic rats (NAR) and were unaffected by the administration of iron. This suggests that in the nephrotic syndrome, a process other than iron depletion stimulates transferrin synthesis.

There was also no correlation between proteinuria and transferrin synthesis (r2 = 0.074, n = 7) or transferrinuria and transferrin synthesis (r2 = 0.047, n = 7). This suggests that loss of transferrin in urine is not directly responsible for increased transferrin synthesis in our nephrotic patients, which is in agreement with studies in Heymann nephritis and in NAR (22).

Alternatively, inflammation could play a role in transferrin metabolism, because transferrin synthesis is suppressed as a component of the acute-phase cascade (36). Because no significant relationship has been found between transferrin synthesis and CRP (r2 = 0.136) or between albumin synthesis and CRP (r2 = 0.005), it is unlikely that inflammation suppresses increased transferrin synthesis for the group as a whole, but it is possible that inflammation and/or malnutrition did significantly suppress the otherwise inadequate synthesis response in the two patients in whom there was overlap with the control group.

Finally, malnutrition could affect transferrin synthesis in nephrotic patients. We recently showed that both nephrotic patients and control subjects exhibited an identical relationship between valine oxidation and urea appearance (37), suggesting that this relationship is unaffected by external loss of protein. This implies that nephrotic patients are able to invoke a normal dietary adaptive response to a low-protein diet, e.g., reducing valine oxidation, and patients therefore are not at an increased risk for malnutrition (38). Moreover, malnutrition is associated with a low transferrin synthesis (20), whereas transferrin synthesis in the present study is increased for the nephrotic group as a whole.

We further tested the hypothesis that transferrin synthesis was related to albumin synthesis, because it was suggested that a group of hepatic proteins are upregulated coordinately in the nephrotic syndrome (1,39). Previously, we described a proportionate increase of albumin and fibrinogen synthesis (31), and we tested whether this is also true for albumin and transferrin. A correlation was found between the synthesis rates of both proteins (r2 = 0.648, P = 0.03, n = 7), suggesting that regulation of synthesis of both proteins is interrelated. Other groups (22,23) also observed a strong correlation for transferrin synthesis and albumin synthesis.

In hereditary analbuminemic rats (NAR), transferrin mass was increased entirely as a consequence of increased synthesis (22), suggesting that a low COP could be a stimulus for increased synthesis. In our group, no significant correlation was found between transferrin synthesis rate and COP (r2 = 0.243, n = 13), in contrast to albumin synthesis rate and COP (31).

The therapeutic approach to maximizing plasma transferrin concentrations in nephrotic patients should be aimed primarily at reducing urinary protein excretion rather than at treatment with anti-inflammatory agents, iron supplementation, or a high-protein diet. In addition, urinary loss of iron should not be ignored. In the present study, urinary iron correlated with urinary transferrin levels (r2 = 0.761, P = 0.01), which is in accordance with the study by Howard et al. (32). At a pH of approximately 6, iron dissociates from transferrin, and depending on the state in which iron exists, it catalyzes the Haber-Weiss reaction with the formation of hydroxyl radicals (40,41). These radicals are toxic to virtually all biologic membranes and could play a role in the pathogenesis of the tubulointerstitial disease present in the nephrotic syndrome. Thus replacement of iron lost into the urine may not be risk free and should not be undertaken without clear evidence of iron deficiency.

In conclusion, transferrin synthesis is increased in the nephrotic syndrome, although less so than albumin, and this response does not compensate the low plasma transferrin concentrations. Transferrin synthesis correlates with albumin synthesis, indicating that several proteins synthesized in the liver are upregulated simultaneously in the nephrotic syndrome.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant from the Dutch Kidney foundation (C98.1777), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the research service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (G.A.K.). Excellent technical assistance was provided by H. Elzinga. We thank Dr. H. A. M. Voorbij for his support.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kaysen GA: Plasma composition in the nephrotic syndrome. Am J Nephrol 13:347 -359, 1993[Medline]
  2. Warshaw BL, Check IJ, Hymes LC, DiRusso SC: Decreased serum transferrin concentration in children with the nephrotic syndrome: Effect on lymphocyte proliferation and correlation with serum immunoglobulin levels. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 33:210 -219, 1984[Medline]
  3. Kemper MJ, Bello AB, Altrogge H, Timmermann K, Ludwig K, Muller-Wiefel DE: Iron homeostasis in relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Clin Nephrol52 : 25-29,1999[Medline]
  4. Schreiber G, Dryburgh H, Millership A, Matsuda Y, Inglis A, Phillips J, Edwards K, Maggs J: The synthesis and secretion of rat transferrin. J Biol Chem 254:12013 -12019, 1979[Free Full Text]
  5. Schaeffer E, Boissier F, Py MC, Cohen GN, Zakin MM: Cell type-specific expression of the human transferrin gene. Role of promoter, negative, and enhancer elements. J Biol Chem264 : 7153-7160,1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Idzerda RL, Huebers H, Finch CA, McKnight GS: Rat transferrin gene expression: Tissue-specific regulation by iron deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3723 -3727, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bloch B, Popovici T, Chouham S, Levin MJ, Tuil D, Kahn A: Transferrin gene expression in choroid plexus of the adult rat brain. Brain Res Bull 18:573 -576, 1987[Medline]
  8. Lash A, Saleem A: Iron metabolism and its regulation. A review. Ann Clin Lab Sci 25:20 -30, 1995[Abstract]
  9. Bonkovsky HL: Iron and the liver. Am J Med Sci 301: 32-43,1991[Medline]
  10. Ponka P, Beaumont C, Richardson DR: Function and regulation of transferrin and ferritin. Semin Hematol35 : 35-54,1 998[Medline]
  11. Andrews NC: Disorders of iron metabolism. N Engl J Med 341:1986 -1995, 1999[Free Full Text]
  12. Ritchie RF, Palomaki GE, Neveux LM, Navolotskaia O, Ledue TB, Craig WY: Reference distributions for the negative acute-phase serum proteins, albumin, transferrin and transthyretin: A practical, simple and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort. J Clin Lab Anal13 : 273-279,1999[Medline]
  13. Johnson AM, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM: Proteins. In: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 3rd Ed., edited by Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1999, pp477 -540
  14. Hamill RL, Woods JC, Cook BA: Congenital atransferrinemia. A case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol96 : 215-218,1991[Medline]
  15. Rifkind D, Kravetz HM, Knight V, Schade AL: Urinary excretion of iron-binding protein in the nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med 256: 115-118,1961
  16. Hancock DE, Onstad JW, Wolf PL: Transferrin loss into the urine with hypochromic, microcytic anemia. Am J Clin Pathol65 : 73-78,1976[Medline]
  17. Gansevoort RT, Vaziri ND, de Jong PE: Treatment of anemia of nephrotic syndrome with recombinant erythropoietin. Am J Kidney Dis 28: 274-277,1996[Medline]
  18. Zhou XJ, Vaziri ND: Erythropoietin metabolism and pharmacokinetics in experimental nephrosis. Am J Physiol263 : F812-F815,1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Beaumier DL, Caldwell MA, Holbein BE: Inflammation triggers hypoferremia and de novo synthesis of serum transferrin and ceruloplasmin in mice. Infect Immun 46:489 -494, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morlese JF, Forrester T, Del Rosario M, Frazer M, Jahoor F: Transferrin kinetics are altered in children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. J Nutr 127:1469 -1474, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jahoor F, Bhattiprolu S, Del Rosario M, Burrin D, Wykes L, Frazer M: Chronic protein deficiency differentially affects the kinetics of plasma proteins in young pigs. J Nutr126 : 1489-1495,1996
  22. Kaysen GA, Sun X, Jones H Jr, Martin VI, Joles JA, Tsukamoto H, Couser WG, al-Bander H: Non-iron mediated alteration in hepatic transferrin gene expression in the nephrotic rat. Kidney Int47 : 1068-1077,1995[Medline]
  23. Jensen H, Bro-Jorgensen K, Jarnum S, Olesen H, Yssing M: Transferrin metabolism in the nephrotic syndrome and in protein-losing gastroenteropathy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest21 : 293-304,1968[Medline]
  24. Keberle H: Physico-chemical factors of drugs affecting absorption, distribution, and excretion. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 29[Suppl 3]:30 -47, 1971
  25. van Eijk HG, van Noort WL: Isolation of rat transferrin using CNBr-activated sepharose 4B. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem14 : 475-478,1976[Medline]
  26. Hill RL: Hydrolysis of proteins. Adv Protein Chem 20: 37-107,1965[Medline]
  27. Husek P: Rapid derivatization and gas chromagraphic determination of amino acids. J Chromatogr552 : 259-299,1991
  28. Korner A, Debro JR: Solubility of albumin in alcohol after precipitation by trichloric acid: A simplified procedure for separation of albumin. Nature 1067:1956
  29. Rocchiccioli F, Leroux JP, Cartier P: Quantitation of 2-ketoacids in biological fluids by gas chromatography chemical ionization mass spectrometry of O-trimethylsilyl-quinoxalinol derivatives. Biomed Mass Spectrom 8:160 -164, 1981[Medline]
  30. Reijngoud DJ, Hellstern G, Elzinga H, de Sain-van der Velden MG, Okken A, Stellaard F: Determination of low isotopic enrichment of L-[1-13C]valine by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry: a robust method for measuring protein fractional synthetic rates in vivo. J Mass Spectrom 33:621 -626, 1998[Medline]
  31. De Sain-van der Velden MG, Kaysen GA, de Meer K, Stellaard F, Voorbij HA, Reijngoud DJ, Rabelink TJ, Koomans HA: Proportionate increase of fibrinogen and albumin synthesis in nephrotic patients: Measurements with stable isotopes. Kidney Int 53:181 -188, 1998[Medline]
  32. Howard RL, Buddington B, Alfrey AC: Urinary albumin, transferrin and iron excretion in diabetic patients. Kidney Int40 : 923-926,1991[Medline]
  33. Katz JH: Iron and protein kinetics studied by means of doubly labeled human crystalline transferrin. J Clin Invest40 : 2143-2152,1961
  34. Jeejeebhoy KN, Phillips MJ, Bruce-Robertson A, Ho J, Sodtke U: The acute effect of ethanol on albumin, fibrinogen and transferrin synthesis in the rat. Biochem J 126:1111 -1124, 1972[Medline]
  35. Jeejeebhoy KN, Bruce-Robertson A, Ho J, Sodtke U: The effect of cortisol on the synthesis of rat plasma albumin, fibrinogen and transferrin. Biochem J 130:533 -538, 1972[Medline]
  36. Oppert M, Gleiter CH, Muller C, Reinicke A, von Ahsen N, Frei U, Eckardt KU: Kinetics and characteristics of an acute phase response following cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med25 : 1386-1394,1999[Medline]
  37. de Sain-van der Velden MG, de Meer K, Kulik W, Melissant CF, Rabelink TJ, Berger R, Kaysen GA: Total body protein synthesis does not increase despite increased synthesis and urinary losses of liver derived protein in the nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis35 : 1149-1154,2000[Medline]
  38. Maroni BJ, Staffeld C, Young VR, Manatunga A, Tom K: Mechanisms permitting nephrotic patients to achieve nitrogen equilibrium with a protein-restricted diet. J Clin Invest99 : 2479-2487,1997[Medline]
  39. Sun X, Kaysen GA: Albumin and transferrin synthesis are increased in H4 cells by serum from analbuminemic or nephrotic rats. Kidney Int 45:1381 -1387, 1994[Medline]
  40. Alfrey AC: Role of iron and oxygen radicals in the progression of chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis23 : 183-187,1994[Medline]
  41. Cooper MA, Buddington B, Miller NL, Alfrey AC: Urinary iron speciation in nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis25 : 314-319,1995[Medline]
Received for publication July 5, 2000. Accepted for publication October 19, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
M. S. Joy, M. La, and Bo Xiao
Individualizing Therapy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2008; 21(3): 225 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. J. W. Branten, D. W. Swinkels, I. S. Klasen, and J. F. M. Wetzels
Serum ferritin levels are increased in patients with glomerular diseases and proteinuria
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2754 - 2760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. H. Bisschop, M. G. M. de Sain-van der Velden, F. Stellaard, F. Kuipers, A. J. Meijer, H. P. Sauerwein, and J. A. Romijn
Dietary Carbohydrate Deprivation Increases 24-Hour Nitrogen Excretion without Affecting Postabsorptive Hepatic or Whole Body Protein Metabolism in Healthy Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3801 - 3805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. Yang, K. Mori, J. Y. Li, and J. Barasch
Iron, lipocalin, and kidney epithelia
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): F9 - F18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRINSEN, B. H. C. M. T.
Right arrow Articles by RABELINK, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PRINSEN, B. H. C. M. T.
Right arrow Articles by RABELINK, T. J.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP