Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAI, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by LEUNG, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAI, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by LEUNG, J. C.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1036-1045, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

Expression of Aquaporin-1 in Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells and Its Upregulation by Glucose In Vitro

KAR NENG LAI, FU KEUNG LI, HAO YUI LAN, SYDNEY TANG, ANITA W. L. TSANG, DANIEL T. M. CHAN and JOSEPH C. LEUNG

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Correspondence to Professor Kar N. Lai, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 409, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. Phone: + 852-28554251; Fax: +852-28162863; E-mail: knlai{at}hkucc.hku.hk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. Aquaporin (AQP) is a family of water channels that are highly selective for the passage of water and occasionally glycerol. In previous studies, only AQP1 was found in human peritoneal endothelial cells in both control subjects and patients on peritoneal dialysis. As human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) play an important role in dialysis adequacy and fluid balance in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, this study examined whether AQP1 is present in HPMC. It was found that AQP1 mRNA and protein are present in HPMC constitutively. The localization of AQP1 protein in peritoneal mesothelial cells was confirmed by double immunohistochemical staining of the mesothelial lining of human peritoneal membrane. More important, the expression of AQP1 in HPMC is not constitutive and the transcription and biosynthesis of AQP1 in HPMC is inducible by osmotic agents such as glucose and mannitol. There was significant enhancement of AQP1 biosynthesis upon exposure to glucose in a time- and dose-dependent manner (P < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed in the AQP1 biosynthesis by an endothelial cell line, EA.hy 926. Of particular interest, the upregulation in AQP1 mRNA or biosynthesis in mesothelial cells was always significantly higher than that of endothelial cells when the experiments were conducted under identical settings (P < 0.001). AQP1 expression in HPMC was demonstrated for the first time. Osmotic agents upregulate both mRNA and protein expression of this aquaporin. The role of AQP1 in HPMC in maintaining the ultrafiltration of the peritoneal membrane is potentially of clinical interest.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The peritoneal cavity is lined by a monolayer of mesothelial cells that provide a large surface for potential fluid movement between peritoneal capillaries and the peritoneal cavity. During chronic peritoneal dialysis, peritoneal mesothelial cells are repeatedly exposed to a nonphysiologic hypertonic environment. Most of the cells have mechanisms that allow them to adjust water content to normal after being exposed to a hyperosmotic or hypo-osmotic milieu (1). However, damage of this membrane as a result of repeated infection or long-term exposure to unphysiologic dialysate can lead to peritoneal fibrosis and ultrafiltration failure in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (2). Such patients may develop interstitial thickening and sclerosis, with complete and irreparable damage to the peritoneal membrane (3). Hence, the functional integrity of the peritoneal membrane plays a pivotal role in the regulation of ultrafiltration, and ultrafiltration failure remains a common complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (4).

Aquaporins (AQP), a family of newly discovered water channel proteins, provide a pathway for water movement across cell membranes that could not be accounted for solely by simple diffusion through the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane. AQP belong to the major intrinsic protein family of channel-like proteins, named after the first member of the family to be identified, the major intrinsic protein of the eye lens (5). In a previous study, only AQP1 was found in human peritoneal endothelial cells in both uremic and CAPD patients (6). As human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) play an important role in dialysis adequacy and fluid balance in CAPD patients, we examined in this study whether AQP-type water channels are present in cultured HPMC and in the mesothelial lining of peritoneal tissue. We confirmed the expression of AQP1 in peritoneal mesothelium. The expression of AQP1 in cultured HPMC and endothelial cells induced by increasing hyperosmotic milieu supports its role in in vivo osmotic water transport across the peritoneal barrier.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibodies and Reagents
Peptide-derived, affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal anti-AQP1 and the immunizing AQP1 control peptide were purchased from Alpha Diagnostics International (San Antonio, TX). A 19 amino acid synthetic peptide within the carboxyl terminal domain of AQP1 was selected for antibody production. This peptide was unique to AQP1 and was without significant homology to any other known eukaryotic protein. The antibodies were affinity purified using control peptide-Sepharose. The antibody was specific for human and rat AQP1 antigens. The affinity-purified anti-AQP1 did not cross-react with human or rat AQP2, AQP3, or AQP5. Monoclonal mouse anti-human mesothelial cell (clone HBME-1), vimentin, polyclonal anti-human factor VIII, and secondary antibodies for histochemical staining were obtained from Dako (Carpinteria, CA). Monoclonal anti-human cytokeratin 18 was obtained from ICN Biochemicals (Aurora, OH). Medium, reagents, and fetal calf serum (FCS) for tissue culture were obtained from Life Technologies (Rockville, MD). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis for Studying the Specificity of Anti-AQP1
Crude tissue or cell extracts were prepared from human kidney cortex, human omentum, cultured peritoneal mesothelial cells, and an immortalized human endothelial cell line (EA.hy 926; a gift from Dr. S. H. Lin, Baker Institute, Melbourne, Australia) using a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma P2714) to minimize protein degradation. The extracts (5 µg) were electrophoresed through 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to polyvinylidenedifluoride membrane. After the membrane was blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (1% gelatin in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] with 0.05% Tween 20), it was incubated for 16 h with anti-AQP (1:2000) in PBS-Tween. The membrane was washed and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with a peroxidaselabeled goat anti-rabbit Ig and detected with ECL chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington, IL).

Cell Culture of Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells and E.A.hy 926
HPMC were obtained from omental tissues of patients who were undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Full consent was obtained from patients for removing small pieces of omentum from resected abdominal tissues for experimental studies. The cells were isolated and characterized using procedures described previously (7). Mesothelial cells showed typical cobblestone appearance at confluence. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for human cytokeratin 18 and vimentin, as well as a polyclonal antibody for human factor VIII. Visualization was done with a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody. All cells were positive for cytokeratin and vimentin (excluding the presence of fibroblasts), but factor VIII antigen was not detected (excluding the presence of endothelial cells). The cells were maintained in medium 199 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg) supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), L-glutamine (2 mM), transferrin (5 µg/ml), insulin (5 µg/ml), and 10% vol/vol FCS. HPMC were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Once monolayers of HPMC reached confluence, the culture medium was removed and medium 199 containing 0.1% (vol/vol) FCS was added to the cells for 48 h before further culture experiments. Under these conditions, the HPMC remained in a nonproliferative viable condition for up to 96 h (8). Confluent cells were split at a ratio of 1:3, and all experiments were performed with cells of first to second passage.

The endothelial cell line (EA.hy 926) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with HAT (hypoxanthine 100 µM, aminopterin 0.4 µM, thymidine 16 µM), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 10% FCS. The characterization of the cell line was reported previously by Edgell et al. (9).

AQP Protein Staining on Cultured HPMC and Human Peritoneal Membrane
HPMC were grown to confluence in an eight-well chamber slide (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL). The confluent cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min at 4°C and washed with PBS. Paraffin-embedded human peritoneal membrane was obtained from four nonuremic patients who were undergoing laparotomy (two men and two women aged 45 to 63 yr with diagnosis of colon cancer) and from four CAPD patients (two men and two women aged 48 to 66 yr on dialysis for 12 to 25 mo with no evidence of ultrafiltration failure) with removal of the peritoneal catheter after repeated tunnel tract infection. The tissues were sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm, and the sections were deparaffinized with xylene and then rehydrated through a descending gradient of ethanol. AQP1 expression on the HPMC monolayer and on the paraffin sections was determined by immunohistochemical staining using specific antibodies for AQP1. Briefly, the slides were incubated with 0.5% hydrogen peroxide for removal of endogenous peroxidase activity. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation of the slides for 30 min with blocking buffer (5% normal goat serum and 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS). The sections were then incubated with anti-AQP1 antibody (0.5 µg/ml) overnight. The bound rabbit anti-AQP1 antibody was visualized as brown color using the Dako Envision Plus System. To ensure the specificity of the staining, we performed the following labeling controls: (1) the primary antibodies were substituted with preimmune rabbit immunoglobulins, (2) staining was carried out without either the primary antibodies or the peroxidase-labeled polymer, and (3) the primary antibodies were preincubated with 50 mg/ml COOH-terminated peptides of AQP1. Some sections were counterstained with hematoxylin before mounting.

Double immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin sections to confirm that the staining of AQP1 was located in mesothelial cells using techniques described previously (10). Briefly, sections first were stained for AQP1 as described above. After the first labeling and color development (brown color for positive AQP1 signal), sections were treated by 10 min of microwave heating in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 2450 MHz and 800 W. The sections were blocked again with blocking buffer and were incubated with mouse anti-human mesothelial cell mAb (clone HBME-1, 1 µg/ml) for 1 h. The sections then were incubated sequentially with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and mouse alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (Dako) and then developed with Fast Blue BB Salt, which gives a blue color for positive reaction.

AQP Protein Expression on Cultured HPMC and EA.hy 926 Exposed to Different Osmotic Agents
HPMC and EA.hy 926 were grown to confluence in eight-well chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International) and exposed to glucose, mannitol, or urea at increasing concentrations (0, 50, 100, or 200 mmol) for a defined time period at 37°C. To study whether AQP1 synthesis was inducible with extended exposure to different osmotic agents, we performed similar experiments with cells cultured for exposure to glucose (100 mmol) or mannitol (100 mmol) for defined time periods (0, 3, 6, or 24 h) at 37°C. AQP1 expression on the monolayer of cells was determined immunohistochemically as described above.

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from HMPC or EA.hy 926 monolayers using QIAGEN RNeasy kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). All RNA samples prepared from 1 x 106 cells were dissolved in 20 µl DEPC-H20 and were stored at -70°C until assay. The quality of RNA was checked by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis, and RNA was quantified by absorbance at 260 mm. Five µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 160 ng oligo (dT)12-18' 500 µM of each dNTP, and 40 U RNase inhibitor for 10 min at 37°C, 60 min at 42°C, and 5 min at 99°C. cDNA was stored at -20°C until further use.

AQP1 Gene Expression by Cultured HPMC and EA.hy 926
HPMC or EA.hy 926 (1 x 106) were grown to confluence in six-well cell culture plates (Falcon, Becton-Dickinson, Cowley, UK). The cells then were exposed to glucose, mannitol, or urea for defined time periods (0, 3, 6, or 24 h) at 37°C. Total cellular RNA then was extracted and reverse transcribed to cDNA as described above. Specific primers for AQP1 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were designed from known GeneBank sequences (AQP 1 NM_000385; GAPDH J04038). The sequences of each primer were as follows: (1) AQP1, sense primer 5'-AGATCAGCATCTTCCGTG and anti-sense primer 5'-AGTTGTGTGTGATCACCG; (2) GAPDH, sense primer 5'-TGAAGG-TCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT and anti-sense primers 5'-CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCC-ACCAC. The PCR was carried out in the following profile: 1st cycle: 94°C for 3 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min; 2nd to 30th cycles: 95°C for 45 s, 55°C for 40 s, 72°C for 45 s. The final cycle was 94°C for 1 min and 72°C for 10 min. The PCR reactions from AQP1 and control (GAPDH) amplicons were mixed and separated by 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide, and the gel image was captured and analyzed using the Gel Doc 1000 Gel Documentation System and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Hercules, CA). The result of AQP1 mRNA yield was expressed as a ratio of AQP1 amplicon to GAPDH amplicon. The following precautions were taken to ensure the validity of the results. (1) Precautions to avoid carryover of PCR product included physical separation of pre-PCR and post-PCR mixtures and aliquots of reagents. (2) The results were considered valid only if these were consistent in repeated independent experiments (four times). (3) Positive control including cell lines (HK2; human kidney proximal tubular cell) that are known to express AQP1 water channel. (4) Negative controls including cells (HepG2, hepatocyte cell line) that are not known to produce the AQP1 water channel, as well as a reaction mixture without RNA or DNA were run in each experiment. (5) Negative controls for PCR consisted of reagent control that RNA was replaced by DEPC-dH2O (6) Confirmation of RNA PCR signal was performed by repeating the PCR without reverse transcription. (7) Further validation of RNA PCR signal was achieved by treating the extracted RNA with DNase free RNase before reverse transcription and PCR.

Cellular Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Assay of AQP1 on Cultured Cells
HPMC or EA.hy 926 (1 x 106) were grown to confluence in 96-well plates (Falcon, Becton-Dickinson). The cells were exposed in quadruplicate to different concentrations of glucose, mannitol, or urea (0 to 200 mmol) for defined time periods (0, 3, 6, or 24 h) at 37°C. After incubation, culture medium was removed and the cells were washed once with PBS and fixed with 1.5% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7) for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then washed with PBS, and nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating with 5% normal goat serum and 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h. After the cells were washed with PBS, they were incubated with 100 µl of anti-AQP1 antibody (0.1 µg/ml) overnight. The cells were washed thrice with PBS, and 100 µl of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (Dako) diluted 1:1000 was added and incubated for another hour. After a final wash, 100 µl/well of ophenylenediamine (OPD) was added and the plates were kept in the dark at room temperature for a minimum of 30 min. Finally, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 50 µl/well 2 M sulfuric acid, and the absorbances were measured at 490 nm using an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate reader (Titertek Multiskan MCC/340, Labsystem, Helsinki, Finland). All experiments were performed in the same batch to avoid interbatch variation.

Measurement of Osmolality
The osmolality of culture medium before and after the addition of various doses of osmotic agents was measured by freezing point depression using the Advanced Osmometer Model 3900 (Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA), with an interassay precision (coefficient of variation of < 1% at 281 mmol/kg). All three osmotic agents (glucose, mannitol, and urea) led to a similar stepwise increase of osmolality from 287 mOsm in culture medium alone to 313 mOsm, 396 mOsm, and 495 mOsm with 50 mM, 100 mM, and 200 mM osmotic agent, respectively.

Statistical Analyses
All data (from four experiments) were expressed as means ± SD. Intergroup differences for continuous variables were assessed by unpaired t test. The AQP1 mRNA or AQP1 expressed on cultured cells after exposure to different osmotic agents and at different time intervals were analyzed with multivariate ANOVA for repeated measures. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software (Statview, SAS Intelligence, Cary, NC). Significance was defined as P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunoblot Detection of AQP1
Figure 1 shows results of Western blot analysis of AQP1 expression in crude cell and tissue extracts. Immunoblotting revealed the presence of two immunopositive bands in crude extracts of EA.hy 926, mesothelial cell, kidney cortex, and omentum. The 28-kD and 46-kD bands represented the nonglycosylated and the glycosylated forms of AQP1, respectively. When the anti-AQP1 antibody was preadsorbed with immunizing peptide, no detectable band could be found for the mesothelial cell crude extract.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Immunoblot analysis of aquaporin-1 (AQP1) expression in different crude extracts. Immunoblot with anti-AQP1 antibody revealed the presence of two immunopositive bands in crude extracts of omentum (lane 1), EA.hy926 (lane 2), kidney cortex (lane 3), and human peritoneal mesothelial cell (lane 4). When the anti-AQP1 antibody was preadsorbed with immunizing peptide, no detectable band could be found for the human peritoneal mesothelial cell extract (lane 5).

 

Tissue Localization of AQP1 Proteins in the Peritoneal Membrane
To localize the in vivo site of AQP1 synthesis within the peritoneal membrane, paraffin sections of omental tissue were immunohistochemically stained using specific antibodies for AQP1 and mesothelial cells as described previously. AQP1 protein was detected in erythrocytes, mesothelial cells, and endothelial cells of venules but not in the endothelial lining of arterioles (Figure 2, A through C). The localization of AQP1 protein in peritoneal mesothelial cells was confirmed by double immunohistochemical staining (Figure 2, E through G). Examination at higher magnification revealed that the AQP1 distribution was both luminal (apical) and abluminal (basolateral). In omental tissues from patients who previously underwent CAPD, there was no obvious difference in the detection of AQP1 in the lining mesothelial cells. However, there were discrete areas with loss of mesothelium and disruption of the interstitium in peritoneal biopsies from patients on CAPD. Not infrequent, there was intimal thickening of vessels with increased interstitial thickening of the peritoneum. AQP1 was not detected in peritoneal lining denuded of mesothelial cells or replaced by fibrous tissue (Figure 2, H and I).



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical localization of AQP1 in peritoneum and cultured human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC). HPMC grown to confluence in an eight-well chamber slide or paraffin-embedded human peritoneal membrane sliced into 4-µm-thick sections were stained with specific anti-AQP antibodies. (A) Lower magnification examination of normal human peritoneum. AQP1 (brown color) was detected on erythrocytes (arrowhead), endothelial cells of venule (thin arrow), and peritoneal mesothelial cells (thick arrow). (B) Absence of AQP1 staining in the peritoneum with nonimmune rabbit IgG. (C) Higher magnification examination of normal human peritoneum. AQP1 (brown color) was detected on erythrocytes (arrowhead), endothelial cells of venule (thin arrow), and peritoneal mesothelial cells (thick arrow) but not on endothelial cells of arteriole (red arrow). (D) Cultured HPMC demonstrated positive staining for AQP1 (orange-brown color). (E) Higher magnification examination of the human peritoneum staining for AQP1, which was located in erythrocytes (arrowhead), endothelial cells of venule (thin arrow), and peritoneal mesothelial cells (thick arrow) (orange-brown color). (F) Higher magnification examination of the human peritoneum using an anti-human mesothelial cell monoclonal antibody (clone: HBME-1); the staining pattern was restricted to the mesothelium (orange-brown color). (G) Higher magnification examination of the human peritoneal membrane double-stained for AQP1 (brown color) and for mesothelial cells (blue color). Erythrocytes (arrowhead) and endothelial cells of venule (thin arrow) were stained positive for AQP1 only, but peritoneal mesothelial cells (thick arrow) showed double staining using anti-AQP1 and anti-human mesothelial cell antibodies. (H) AQP1 was not stained in peritoneal lining denuded of mesothelial cells (arrow), whereas normal peritoneal mesothelial cells stained positive for AQP1 (arrowhead). (I) AQP1 was not stained in peritoneal mesothelial lining replaced by fibrous tissue (arrow), yet normal peritoneal mesothelial cells stained positive for AQP1 (arrowhead). Magnifications: x100 in A (counterstained with hematoxylin); x400 in B (counterstained with hematoxylin), C (counterstained with hematoxylin), D, E, F, G, H, and I.

 

Gene and Protein Expression of AQP1 by HPMC and EA.hy 926
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with sequence-specific cDNA primers was performed on growth-arrested, confluent HPMC or EA.hy 926 monolayers. Primary human proximal tubule cells and HK-2 cell lines were used as positive controls. Constitutive expression of AQP1 mRNA was detected in both types of cells (Figure 3). The cDNA product of AQP1 is identical to the known GeneBank sequence. Immunohistochemical staining using specific anti-AQP antibody on quiescent HPMC monolayers confirmed that AQP1 protein was expressed constitutively (Figure 4A). Similarly, AQP1 protein was expressed constitutively in cultured EA.hy 926 (data not shown).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Expression of AQP1 mRNA (AQP1 PCR product, 354 bp) in HMPC (A) or endothelial cell line (EA.hy 926) (B) exposed to increasing concentration of glucose for 16 h.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. AQP protein synthesis in HPMC. HPMC were grown to confluence in eight-well chamber slides, growth arrested, and incubated in medium with glucose for 16 h. The cell monolayer then was immunochemically stained to detect the presence of AQP1 antigen. In the quiescent state, there was readily detectable constitutive AQP1 (brown color) (A). AQP1 protein synthesis increased after exposure to glucose in increasing concentration: 50 mM (B), 100 mM (C), and 200 mM (D). Magnification, x200 (counterstained with hematoxylin).

 

Effect of Glucose on AQP Gene Expression
To mimic the peritoneal milieu in acute peritoneal dialysis, glucose adjusted to a concentration of 100 mM (1.8% wt/vol) was added to the culture medium in which cells were incubated for different time periods. AQP1 gene expression was significantly upregulated in both types of cells after 3 h of incubation with glucose. By 24 h, the normalized AQP1/GAPDH ratio had increased by 31% and 15% compared with control (constitutive) values in HPMC and EA.hy 926, respectively (Figure 5A). Similarly, incubating either cell type with increasing concentration of glucose for 16 h enhanced AQP1 gene expression (Figure 6A). Upregulation in AQP1 mRNA expression was significant even in HPMC or EA.hy 926 exposed to a lower concentration of glucose (50 mM), rising to 128% and 12% above that of control (constitutive) values, respectively. In all experiments under identical conditions, the upregulation in AQP1 mRNA in HPMC was significantly higher than that of EA.hy 926 (P < 0.001).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. (A) Time response in AQP1 gene expression upon exposure to glucose. Treatment with glucose (100 mM) led to a time-dependent upregulation in AQP1 gene expression in HPMC or EA.hy 926. Measurement of AQP1 mRNA at different time intervals differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 3 and 6 h (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments. (B) Time response in AQP1 protein synthesis upon exposure to glucose. HPMC or EA.hy 926 were grown in 96-well plates to confluence, growth arrested, and incubated with glucose at a concentration of 100 mM. After defined time points, a cellular enzymelinked immunosorbent assay was used to assay the response in AQP synthesis. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of four individual experiments in optical density (OD). Treatment with glucose (100 mM) led to a time-dependent upregulation in AQP1 protein synthesis in both cell types. Measurement of AQP1 protein in HPMC at different time intervals differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 6 and 24 h (P < 0.01). Measurement of AQP1 protein EA.hy 926 at different time intervals differed significantly from each other (P < 0.01).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. (A) Dose response in AQP1 gene expression upon exposure to glucose. A dose-dependent upregulation in AQP1 gene expression in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to glucose for 16 h. Measurement of AQP1 mRNA in HPMC at different dose concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 100 and 200 mM (P < 0.01). Measurement of AQP1 mRNA in EA.hy 926 at different concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 0 and 50 mM (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments. (B) Dose response in AQP1 protein synthesis upon exposure to glucose. A dose-dependent upregulation in AQP1 protein synthesis in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to glucose for 16 h. Measurement of AQP1 protein in HPMC at different dose concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 100 and 200 mM (P < 0.01). Measurement of AQP1 protein in EA.hy 926 at different dose concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 50 and 100 mM (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments.

 

Effect of Glucose on AQP1 Protein Synthesis
To confirm that the AQP transcripts led to protein biosynthesis, we grew, growth arrested, and incubated with glucose (100 mM) HPMC or EA.hy 926 to confluence in eight-well chamber slides, for various time points. The monolayer of cells then was stained immunohistochemically for AQP1 antigen as described previously. Positive control for AQP1 protein was confirmed by immunohistochemical studies on cultured human proximal tubule cells, HK-2 cell lines, and proximal renal tubules in paraffin sections of renal cortex from human. Treatment with glucose led to a time-dependent progressive increase in the number of cells that stained positively for AQP1 (data not shown). After 3 h of incubation, an appreciable proportion of HPMC displayed positive AQP1 staining (Figure 2D). Treatment with increasing concentration of glucose led to a progressive increase in the number of cells that stained positively for AQP1 (Figure 4). Similarly, increasing staining for APQ1 protein was detected in cultured EA.hy 926 after exposure to glucose (data not shown).

To quantify further the stimulatory effect of glucose on AQP1 synthesis by HPMC or EA.hy 926, we performed a cellular ELISA on monolayers of quiescent cells exposed to glucose (100 mM) for 3 to 24 h. As depicted in Figure 5B, there was a time-dependent increase in the synthesis of AQP1 on exposure to glucose. By 24 h, AQP1 synthesis had surged by more than 32% and 63% over baseline values in HPMC and EA.hy 926, respectively.

To quantify the dose response, we applied escalating doses of glucose (0 to 200 mM) to monolayers of quiescent cells for 16 h. A dose-dependent increase in the production of AQP1 was detected when HPMC or EA.hy 926 was incubated with progressively higher concentrations of glucose (Figure 6B). The dose-related rise in AQP1 production in EA.hy 926 seemed to plateau earlier than that in HPMC. There were detectable morphologic changes in the cells (shrinkage in cell volume) with higher than 50 mM glucose in the culture medium (data not shown).

Effect of Other Osmotic Agents on AQP1 Gene Expression
A stepwise upregulation in AQP1 mRNA expression was observed in HPMC or EA.hy 926 exposed to increasing concentration of mannitol (from 50 to 200 mM; Figure 7A). There was a parallel increased in AQP1 synthesis when cells were incubated with increasing concentration of mannitol (Figure 7B). The findings of HPMC or EA.hy 926 when exposed to urea were different from those with glucose or mannitol. Although exposure to a lower concentration of urea (50 mM) induced an upregulation in both the gene expression and the protein synthesis of AQP1, exposure to a higher concentration (>=100 mM) led to a significant fall in the gene expression and protein synthesis of AQP1 (Figure 8). At these concentrations, cells showed marked morphologic changes in the volume and viability. These findings likely were due to cell injury and apoptosis induced by a high concentration of urea (11).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. (A) Dose response in AQP1 gene expression upon exposure to mannitol. A dose-dependent upregulation in AQP1 mRNA in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to mannitol for 16 h. Measurement of AQP1 mRNA in HPMC at different dose concentrations differed significantly from each other (P < 0.01). Measurement of AQP1 mRNA in EA.hy 926 at different concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 100 and 200 mM (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments. (B) Dose response in AQP1 protein synthesis upon exposure to mannitol. A dose-dependent upregulation in AQP1 protein synthesis in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to mannitol for 16 h. Measurement of AQP1 protein in HPMC at different dose concentrations differed significantly from the control value (P < 0.05). Measurement of AQP1 protein in EA.hy 926 at different concentrations differed significantly from each other except for measurements between 50 and 100 mM (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. (A) Dose response in AQP1 gene expression upon exposure to urea. A significant upregulation in AQP1 mRNA in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to urea (50 mM) for 16 h (P < 0.01). Exposure to a higher concentration of urea led to a stepwise reduction in AQP1 gene expression in both cell types. Measurement of AQP1 mRNA at 200 mM was significantly lower than the control value (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments. (B) Dose response in AQP1 protein expression upon exposure to urea. A significant upregulation in AQP1 protein synthesis in HPMC or EA.hy 926 upon exposure to urea (50 mM) for 16 h (P < 0.01). Exposure to a higher concentration of urea led to a stepwise reduction in AQP1 protein synthesis in both cell types. Measurement of AQP1 mRNA at 200 mM was significantly lower than the control value (P < 0.01). Data are mean ± SD of four individual experiments.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Monolayers of mesothelial cells provide a large surface for potential fluid movement between peritoneal capillaries and the peritoneal cavity. Peritoneal biopsy from patients on CAPD revealed loss of mesothelium with time and disruption of the interstitium, and these findings may be independent of peritonitis (12). There was replication of mesothelial and capillary basement membrane resulting in considerable subendothelial thickening and culminating eventually in occlusion of capillary lumina (13). The extent of advanced glycation end product (AGE) accumulation correlated directly with the progression of interstitial fibrosis and vascular sclerosis. In addition, changes in ultrafiltration were correlated inversely to microvascular AGE accumulation as well as interstitial fibrosis (14).

Rippe et al. (15), using computer simulations, first suggested that the peritoneal membrane permeability is best described by a three-pore model. Large pores (>150 ) allow the transport of macromolecules and, together with small pores (20 to 25 ), the transport of low-molecular-weight solutes such as glucose, urea, and creatinine. An "ultrasmall, water-only" pore (3 to 5 ) has been postulated to be selective for water and responsible for the majority of osmotically induced water transport (16). Recently discovered AQP were suggested to have a pore size comparable to that of the ultrasmall pores and might provide the molecular route for water movement through apparent ultrasmall pores in the peritoneal barrier (17,18). It is apparent that examination of the expression of AQP in resident cells of the peritoneum will provide better understanding of the mechanism of transcellular water transport.

AQP1 has been localized to the peritoneum by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization (19), as well as by immunocytochemistry (20). In rat peritoneum, AQP1 has been localized to capillary endothelia and "mesangium/mesothelium" near the peritoneal luminal surface (20,21). Using affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies from the same laboratory, Combet et al. (22) failed to detect AQP1 in the mesothelium in a rat model of acute peritonitis. AQP1 has also been detected in microvascular endothelial cells in peritoneal biopsies of uremic patients (6,23). Similarly, the signal for AQP1 was restricted to endothelial cells of peritoneal capillaries and venules but not in arterioles or mesothelial cells when immunocytochemistry was performed using polyclonal antibodies from the same laboratory. Recent studies showed a significant reduction of osmotically induced water transport upon AQP1 deletion in AQP1 knockout mice (21). In contrast, AQP1 deletion exerted little effect on slow isosmolar fluid absorption from the peritoneal cavity. It seems, therefore, that AQP1 is crucial in transendothelial water transport when driven by osmosis in peritoneal dialysis, yet the presence of AQP1 in peritoneal mesothelial cells is not well documented.

Mesothelial cells behave as perfect osmometers: they shrink when exposed to hypertonic medium and swell when exposed to medium with a lower osmolality. The change in cellular water content in mesothelial cells is immediate—within 5 min of exposure to the hyperosmotic medium (24). Volume of cultured mesothelial cells was reduced by 36% of control value when exposed to medium supplemented with 90 mM glucose for 90 min (24). It is important to clarify whether transmembrane water transport induced by osmotic agents in peritoneal dialysis is mediated by endothelial AQP1 alone or the mesothelial cells may also play a role. The latter possibility is raised by the murine experiment of Akiba et al. (25), who detected AQP1 transcripts from peritoneal cells removed by peritoneal lavage. The cells were identified as mesothelial in origin with strong staining of cytokeratin 18. The AQP1 signal in cultured rat mesothelial cells increased with higher concentration of glucose (2.1- and 3.7-fold increase in AQP1 expression versus 2.6- and 2.9-fold increase in our human data after incubation with 100 mM and 200 mM glucose). Unfortunately, as the AQP protein was not measured and AQP1 mRNA might be derived from other cell sediments, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn.

In this study, we demonstrated that AQP1 mRNA is present in HPMC constitutively. With the use of a different peptidederived, affinity-purified polyclonal anti-AQP1 antibody and a peroxidase-labeled polymer for more sensitive visualization of signals, constitutive AQP1 protein was readily detected in resting HPMC. The localization of AQP1 protein in peritoneal mesothelial cells was confirmed by double immunohistochemical staining of mesothelial lining of human peritoneal membrane. The mesothelial cells, identified by their position and by a specific mouse anti-human mesothelial cell mAb (clone HBME-1), clearly expressed AQP1 constitutively. On the histologic examination, we confirmed the previous observation that AQP1 expression is restricted to endothelial cells of peritoneal capillaries and venules but not in arteriole (23). More important, the expression of AQP1 in HPMC not only is constitutive but also can readily be upregulated upon exposure to osmotic agents as in peritoneal dialysis leading to rapid transmembrane water transport. We developed a novel cellular ELISA for detecting AQP1 on the cell surface. The assay was confirmed by parallel flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). Our in vitro studies showed clearly that transcription and biosynthesis of AQP1 in HPMC is inducible by osmotic agents such as glucose. There was significant enhancement of AQP1 biosynthesis upon exposure to glucose in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Similar findings were observed in the AQP1 biosynthesis by an endothelial cell line, EA.hy 926. Of particular interest, the upregulation in AQP1 mRNA or biosynthesis in mesothelial cells was always significantly higher than that of endothelial cells when the experiments were conducted under identical conditions. The parallel experiments with mannitol adding to the medium suggest that our findings with glucose merely reflect its role as an osmotic agent in osmotically induced water transport. The experimental findings with lower concentration of urea adding to the medium also support our observation that HPMC readily upregulates its AQP1 biosynthesis upon exposure to any osmotic agent. A higher concentration of urea (raising the osmolality to 550 mOsm) readily induced apoptotic cell death in mouse renal collecting duct cells (11). It seems, from our findings in cell morphology and AQP1 expression, that both HPMC and endothelial cell line (EA.hy 926) are more susceptible to the cytotoxic effect of urea when the urea concentration exceeds 100 mM (raising the osmolality to 400 mOsm).

Our demonstration of constitutive AQP1 in HPMC, which is inducible by an osmotic agent, poses a question on the traditional understanding of endothelium of peritoneal capillaries and venules as being the major site of water transport across the peritoneal membrane (6,22). The luminal and abluminal distribution of AQPI in HPMC, shown in this study, affords a transcellular mechanism of water movement across the peritoneal mesothelial lining after the transport of water from the capillary lumen to the interstitium near the peritoneal luminal surface. The crucial question is how this new information of localization of AQP1 in peritoneal cells is related to ultrafiltration failure in long-term CAPD. Obviously, this can not be answered in our in vitro experiments with HPMC exposed to osmotic agents for a short period. However, the histologic examination of omentum from our patients on CAPD sheds some intriguing information. There was evidence of denudation of mesothelium, interstitial fibrosis, and luminal narrowing of vessels. Despite that there was no obvious difference in the detection of AQP1 in the lining mesothelial cells between control subjects and CAPD patients, AQP1 was not detected in peritoneal lining denuded of mesothelial cells or replaced by fibrous tissue. One may speculate that such peritoneal changes with long-term CAPD will lead to decreased expression of AQP1 on the peritoneal lining denuded of mesothelial cells. The effect of AGE accumulation and vascular sclerosis on the AQP1 expression by endothelium remains to be examined. Further in vitro studies with AGE and animal models of chronic peritoneal dialysis may provide answers to some of these questions.

In summary, we demonstrated for the first time AQP1 expression in HPMC. Osmotic agents such as glucose and mannitol upregulate both mRNA and protein expression of this AQP. Though the exact pathophysiologic sequel to transmembrane water transport in long-term CAPD remains to be elucidated, our findings may pave the way for future research into the mechanisms of ultrafiltration failure in CAPD.


    Acknowledgments
 
The study was supported by grants from the Jardine Charitable Fund (Hong Kong) and CERG grant no. 10203418.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Parker JC: In defense of cell volume? Am J Physiol 265:C191 -C200, 1993
  2. Gandhi VC, Humayun HM, Ing TS, Daugirdas JT, Jabolokow VR, Iwatsuki S, Geis WP, Hano JE: Sclerotic thickening of the peritoneal membrane in maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients. Arch Intern Med 140:1202 -1203, 1980
  3. Rubin J, Herrara GA, Collins D: An autopsy study of the peritoneal cavity from patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 19:97 -102, 1991
  4. Korbet SM, Rodby RA: Peritoneal membrane failure: Differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Semin Dial7 : 128-132,1994
  5. Gorin MB, Yancey SB, Cline J, Revel JP, Horwitz J: The major intrinsic protein (MIP) of the bovine lens fiber membrane: Characterization and structure based on cDNA cloning. Cell39 : 49-59,1984[Medline]
  6. Pannekeet MM, Mulder JB, Weening JJ, Struijk DG, Zweers MM, Krediet RT: Demonstration of aquaporin-CHIP in peritoneal tissue of uremic and CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int16 [Suppl 1]: S54-S57,1996
  7. Stylianou E, Jenner LA, Davies M, Coles GA, Williams JD: Isolation, culture and characterization of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int 37:1563 -1570, 1990[Medline]
  8. Topley N, Jorres, Lutterman W, Petersen MM, Lang MJ, Thierauch KH, Muller C, Coles GA, Davies M, William JD: Human peritoneal mesothelial cells synthesize interleukin 6: Induction by IL-1ß and TNF{alpha}. Kidney Int 43:226 -233, 1993[Medline]
  9. Edgell CJS, McDonald CC, Graham JB: Permanent cell line expressing human factor VIII-related antigen established by hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:3734 -3737, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lan HY, Mu W, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Atkin RC: A novel, simple, reliable, and sensitive method for multiple immunoenzyme staining: Use of microwave oven heating to block antibody crossreactivity and retrieve antigen. J Histochem Cytochem 43:97 -102, 1995[Abstract]
  11. Michea L, Ferguson DR, Peters EM, Andrew PM, Kirby MR, Burg, MB: Cell cycle delay and apoptosis are induced by high salt and urea in renal medullary cells. Am J Physiol (Renal Physiol)278 : F209-F218,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Di Paolo N, Sacchi G, De Mia M, Gaggiotti E, Capotondo L, Rossi P, Bernini M, Pucci AM, Ibba L, Sabattelli P: Morphology of the peritoneal membrane during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 44:204 -211, 1986[Medline]
  13. Di Paolo N, Sacchi G: Peritoneal vascular changes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: An in vivo model of the study of diabetic microangiopathy. Perit Dial Int9 : 41-45,1989
  14. Honda K, Nitta K, Horita S, Yumura W, Nihei H, Nagai R, Ikeda K, Horiuchi S: Accumulation of advanced glycation end products in the peritoneal vasculature of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients with low ultrafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant14 : 1541-1549,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rippe B, Stelin G, Haraldsson B: Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. Kidney Int40 : 315-421,1991[Medline]
  16. Kabanda A, Goffin E, Bernard A, Lauwerys R, van Ypersele de Strihou C: Factors influencing serum levels and peritoneal clearances of low molecular weight proteins in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 48:1946 -1952, 1995[Medline]
  17. Zeidel ML, Ambudkar SV, Smith BL, Agre P: Reconstitution of functional water channels in liposomes containing purified red cell CHIP28 protein. Biochemistry 31:7436 -7440, 1992[Medline]
  18. Verbavatz JM, Brown D, Sabolic I, Valenti G, Ausiello DA, Van Hoek AN, Ma T, Verkman AS: Tetrameric assembly of CHIP28 water channels in liposomes and cell membrane: A freeze-fracture study. J Cell Biol 123:605 -618, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hayakawa H: Study of peritoneal water transporter expression in rats. Jpn J Nephrol 38:535 -544, 1996
  20. Carlsson O, Nielsen S, Zakaria ER, Rippe B: In vivo inhibition of transcellular water channels (aquaporin-1) during acute peritoneal dialysis in rats. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol 40)271 : H2254-H2262,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yang B, Folkesson HG, Yang J, Matthay MA, Ma T, Verkman AS: Reduced osmotic water permeability of the peritoneal barrier in aquaporin-1 knockout mice. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiol)276 : C76-C81,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Combet S, van Landschoot M, Moulin P, Piech A, Verbavatz J-M, Goffin E, Balligand J-L, Lameire N, Devuyst O: Regulation of aquaporin-1 and nitric oxide synthase isoforms in a rat model of acute peritonitis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:2185 -2196, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Goffin E, Combet S, Jamar F, Cosyns J-P, Devuyst O: Expression of aquaporin-1 in a long-term peritoneal dialysis patient with impaired transcellular water transport. Am J Kidney Dis33 : 383-388,1999[Medline]
  24. Breborowicz A, Polubinska A, Oreopoulos DG: Changes in volume of peritoneal mesothelial cells exposed to osmotic stress. Perit Dial Int 19: 119-123,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Akiba T, Ota T, Fushimi K, Shimamura H, Tamura H, Sasaki S, Marumo F: Water channel AQP1 in the primary cell culture of rat peritoneum. Adv Perit Dial 15:3 -6, 1999
Received for publication July 19, 2000. Accepted for publication September 26, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. Rusthoven, R. T. Krediet, H. L. Willems, L. A.H. Monnens, and C. H. Schroder
Peritoneal Transport Characteristics with Glucose Polymer-Based Dialysis Fluid in Children
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2940 - 2947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. N. Lai, S. C. W. Tang, J.-Y. Guh, T.-D. Chuang, M. F. Lam, L. Y. Y. Chan, A. W. L. Tsang, and J. C. K. Leung
Polymeric IgA1 from Patients with IgA Nephropathy Upregulates Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Synthesis and Signal Transduction in Human Mesangial Cells via the Renin-Angiotensin System
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3127 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAI, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by LEUNG, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LAI, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by LEUNG, J. C.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP