Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MIYAJI, T.
Right arrow Articles by HISHIDA, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MIYAJI, T.
Right arrow Articles by HISHIDA, A.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:900-908, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

Role of the Increase in p21 in Cisplatin-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats

TAKEHIKO MIYAJI, AKIHIKO KATO, HIDEO YASUDA, YOSHIHIDE FUJIGAKI and AKIRA HISHIDA

First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to Dr. Akira Hishida, First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600 Handa-cho, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. Phone: +81-53-435-2261; Fax: +81-53-434-9447; E-mail: ahishida{at}hama-med.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. The goal of this study was to clarify the role of p21, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in acute renal failure (ARF). This was accomplished with the examination of the renal expression of p21 in cisplatin (CDDP)-induced ARF and in rechallenge injury with CDDP. The injection of CDDP (5 mg/kg) into rats induced increases in serum creatinine and tubular damage and the number of in situ DNA nick end labeling—positive cells, which peaked at day 5, followed by recovery to control levels by day 14. The rechallenge with the same dose of CDDP 14 d after the first dose of CDDP induced significantly less injury and no significant increase in in situ DNA nick end labeling—positive cells. The first CDDP dose significantly increased p53-positive nuclei at day 1, which disappeared by day 5, and the number of p21-positive nuclei, which had two peaks on days 3 and 9. The number of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive nuclei peaked at days 3 and 12. A significant increase in the incorporation of 5-bromo 2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) was found at day 5 and peaked at day 7. The second injection of CDDP induced significant increases in the number of p21-, p53-, and PCNA-positive nuclei within 2 d but did not affect the incorporation of BrdU. These findings suggested that (1) CDDP induced two peaks of the increase in p21; (2) the first peak occurred shortly after CDDP and was accompanied by overexpression of p53 and PCNA but not with BrdU incorporation, possibly reflecting G1 arrest and DNA repair; (3) the second peak of p21 occurred through an p53-independent pathway and may contribute to cell differentiation; and (4) the overexpression of p21 and PCNA in rechallenge injury may contribute to acquired resistance in CDDP-induced ARF via enhanced DNA repair.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nephrotoxicity is the most common adverse effect that limits the use of cisplatin (CDDP), which is used widely for the treatment of human solid tumors. We previously reported that animals that are recovering from acute renal failure (ARF) are resistant to a subsequent insult with a nephrotoxic agent (1,2,3,4). This phenomenon, called acquired resistance, is known to be associated with less tubular damage and less apoptotic cell death (2,3,4). However, the exact mechanisms for CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity and for this acquired resistance to CDDP remain to be clarified.

An increase in proliferating nuclear cell antigen (PCNA)-positive nuclei was recognized in ischemic (5) and nephrotoxic ARF including CDDP (2). The expression of PCNA initially was considered as a marker of proliferating cells (6). However, studies have demonstrated that PCNA is expressed not only in proliferating cells but also in nonproliferating cells that are in G1-phase arrest and are repairing their DNA (7,8,9,10). Thus, the increased PCNA-positive nuclei in the damaged kidney may, in part, reflect increased cells arrested in G1-phase. G1-phase arrest may be a critical step that determines the fate of a damaged cell (11). In the case of unsuccessful DNA repair, the cells will undergo apoptosis (11), which is reported to be closely associated with tubular damage in ischemic (5) and nephrotoxic (2,3) ARF.

p21, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, is known to play a key role in stopping the cycle at the G1 phase. Megyesi et al. (12) demonstrated upregulation of p21 mRNA in ARF-induced ischemia, CDDP, or ureteral obstruction. They also reported that in p21 knockout mice, CDDP caused a more rapid onset of ARF and induced more severe morphologic damage and higher mortality than in wild-type litter mates (13). These findings suggested that the induction of p21 plays a protective role in kidney cells by preventing DNA-damaged cells from progressing in the cell cycle without repair, which eventually would result in death from either apoptosis or necrosis (13). However, the exact roles of the increase in p21 in ARF remain unclear. If the p21-induced G1 arrest and DNA repair shown by PCNA expression play an important role in CDDP-induced ARF, then the degree of p21 and PCNA expression would be modulated in rechallenge injury.

In the present study, we evaluated the expression of p21 and PCNA and the number of apoptotic cells in the development of CDDP-induced ARF and in acquired resistance to CDDP. We also examined the expression of p53, which acts as a transcriptional activator to enhance expression of the p21 gene. A significant expression of p21 was observed in the development of ARF. The reduction in tubular damage after the second CDDP was associated with higher expression of p21. The expression of p21 during the development of ARF was associated with the overexpression of p53 and PCNA but not with 5-bromo 2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) incorporation. These data suggested that p21 may play a protective role to prevent the development of CDDP-induced ARF.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of CDDP-Induced ARF and Acquired Resistance to CDDP Nephrotoxicity
Ninety-five male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 260 to 300 g (SLC Co., Shizuoka, Japan), were provided with standard rat chow and drinking water ad libitum. The animals were divided into two groups. In group 1 (n = 63), rats received a single intravenous injection of CDDP (5 mg/kg body wt; a gift of Nippon Kayaku Inc., Tokyo, Japan). In group 2 (acquired resistance model, n = 32), rats received the same dosage of CDDP followed by a second injection of 5 mg/kg of CDDP 14 d after the first injection, when the serum creatinine (Scr) levels had returned to the basal value. In group 1, seven rats were killed each day under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia (50 mg/kg) before and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 14 d after CDDP injection. In group 2, eight rats were killed each day at 1, 2, 3, and 5 d after the second injection of CDDP. In both groups, blood was obtained from the abdominal aorta for measurement of the concentration of Scr using an enzymatic assay (Mizuho Medy, Saga, Japan), and the kidneys were removed for immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). The kidney samples for RT-PCR were frozen quickly in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until required for analysis. To determine which cells were in the S phase of the cell cycle, we injected 40 mg/kg BrdU intraperitoneally into all rats 1 h before the rats were killed.

Histologic Examination
For histologic examination, the excised left kidneys were fixed in 20% neutral-buffered formalin solution. The kidney tissue block was dehydrated in graded alcohol, embedded in paraffin, cut at 3 µm, and then stained with periodic acid-Schiff reagent. Because tubular damage was most evident in the outer medulla, we carried out a semi-quantitative analysis of the histologic damage on this area. Thirty tubules were randomly selected at x400 magnification and scored for each rat. Each tubular profile was assigned one of four categories according to the following criteria (4): 1, areas of tubular epithelial cell swelling, vacuolar degeneration, necrosis, and desquamation involving <25% of tubular profile; 2, similar changes involving >=25% but <50% of tubular profile; 3, similar changes involving >=50% but <75% of tubular profile, and 4, similar changes involving >=75% of tubular profile. To minimize observer bias, the morphometric examination was performed in a blinded manner without knowledge of the treatment group from which the tissue originated. The mean score for each rat and the mean score for each group were calculated.

Immunohistochemical Detection of the Expression of p53, p21, and Cell Cycle Markers (PCNA and BrdU Incorporation)
For immunohistochemical detection of p53, p21, and cell cycle markers, 3-µm-thick sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation of the sections with 20% normal goat serum for 15 min at room temperature, samples were incubated with a polyclonal antibody against p53 (Sant Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at 4°C, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against p21 (Sant Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C, a mAb against PCNA (Oncogene Science, Uniondale, NY) for 30 min at 37°C, or a mAb against BrdU (Amersham International plc, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 1 h at 37°C. Then, samples were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, the reaction products were visualized using hydrogen peroxide containing 3,3'-diaminobenzidine in 0.05 M Tris buffer. Control sections against p21 or p53 were incubated overnight using phosphate buffer solution for the primary antibody.

The numbers of p53-, p21-, PCNA-, and BrdU-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla were counted under a light microscope at x400 magnification. The number of positive nuclei for each time point was expressed as the average value based on the examination of 50 fields in each experimental animal by an investigator who was blinded to the treatment of each animal.

Assessment of Apoptosis
The degree of apoptosis was assessed using the in situ DNA nick end labeling (TUNEL). We previously confirmed that the same dosage of CDDP induced nuclear condensation on electron microscopy and a ladder pattern on DNA electrophoresis in rats (3). The tissue was deparaffinized and rehydrated, followed by incubation of 3-µm-thick sections with 20 µg/ml proteinase K for 15 min and immersion in distilled water containing 3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min at room temperature. Detection of DNA fragmentation was performed using ApoTag plus in situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). A semiquantitative analysis was performed by counting TUNEL-positive cells per field at x400 magnification in the outer stripe of the outer medulla. The mean number of stained cells in 50 randomly selected fields in each kidney was expressed as the number of TUNEL-positive cells.

mRNA Isolation and Semiquantitative Analysis of p21 mRNA by RT-PCR
For isolation of p21 mRNA, the kidneys were perfused with icecold diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated phosphate buffer solution. Total RNA was extracted from whole kidneys in each rat (n = 3) using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After treatment with DNase, we obtained poly-A+ enriched RNA by binding to oligo (dT) cellulose beads according to Megyesi's protocol (11). mRNA samples were quantified by spectrophotometry at 260 nm.

Oligo-dT-primed cDNA was used to amplify for specific p21 mRNA species by RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed using Super-Script ONE-STEP RT-PCR System (Life Technologies BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each PCR cycle consisted of a denaturation step at 94°C for 1 min, an annealing step at 63°C (p21) or at 51°C (glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH]) for 1 min, and an extension step at 72°C for 1 min. The primers for p21 were 5'-CGGGCAGTCCCTTCTAGTTCC-3' (sense; 451 to 470 bp) and 5'-AATGCTTGAGCACACACGAG-3' (antisense; 654 to 635 bp), respectively. An intron was not included between two primers. These primers yielded a 204-bp product by amplifying at 30 cycles. RT-PCR products were run on 2% agarose gels and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. All ethidium bromide—stained bands were quantified using NIH image version 1.61. We confirmed that mRNA samples without RT did not yield any band on agarose gel, indicating that PCR products were derived specifically from p21 mRNA but not from contaminated genomic DNA. The semiquantitative analysis of this RT-PCR product was conducted by factoring GAPDH-PCR products similarly determined by RT-PCR as the internal standard. At least three different samples were investigated at each time point.

Statistical Analyses
All data were presented as mean ± SEM. Significant differences among data were determined using one-way ANOVA with standard post hoc testing (Statview, version 5.0, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). P < 0.05 denoted the presence of a statistically significant difference.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of ARF by CDDP
CDDP injection (5 mg/kg) induced a significant but transient increase in Scr. The Scr level peaked at day 5 and then gradually returned to the basal values by day 14 (Figure 1). Histologic examination revealed extensive tubular damage and intratubular cast formation in the outer stripe of the outer medulla by day 5. A few TUNEL-positive cells were found only in the distal tubules in normal kidneys. In contrast, CDDP injection maximally increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells at day 5 in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (6.09 ± 0.91/hiigh-power field [HPF], P < 0.01 versus day 0; Figure 2A) when the Scr level peaked. The number of TUNEL-positive cells was decreased gradually until day 14 (Figure 3A).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Serum creatinine (Scr) concentration in cisplatin (CDDP)-injected rats. CDDP induced a significant increase in Scr values on day 5. The Scr returned to the basal level by day 14. Scr values after the second injection of CDDP increased but were not statistically significant compared with those before the second injection (group 2). A significant attenuation of the CDDP-induced increase in Scr levels at day 5 was found in group 2 compared with those in group 1. Data are mean ± SEM. *, P<0.01 versus day 0; **, P<0.05 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of immunostaining for in situ DNA nick end labeling (TUNEL; A and B), p53 (C), and p21 (D through F) in the outer stripe of the outer medulla in CDDP-induced acute renal failure (ARF) in rats. There were a significant number TUNEL-positive cells observed in the outer stripe of the outer medulla at day 5 after the first CDDP injection in group 1 (A). In contrast, a few of the TUNEL-positive cells could be found in the CDDP-pretreated kidney at day 5 (B). The peak number of p53- or p21-positive nuclei was observed in the outer stripe of the outer medulla at day 1 in group 1 (C) or at day 3 in group 1 (D), respectively. p21-positive nuclei were located mainly in the flat epithelial cells from tubules with a dilated lumen at day 9 (E) during the recovery phase of ARF. p21-positive nuclei were significantly increased in the outer stripe of the outer medulla 2 d after the second injection of CDDP in group 2 (F). No specific signal was observed in the negative control section (G). Magnification, x400.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Serial changes in the number of TUNEL-positive nuclei (A), p53-positive nuclei (B), and p21-positive nuclei (C) in the outer stripe of the outer medulla after CDDP injection. (A) A significant increase in TUNEL-positive cells after a single CDDP injection was found at days 3 through 7. In contrast, pretreatment with CDDP did not induce any increase in TUNEL-positive cells (group 2). (B) CDDP promptly upregulated p53 expression in the kidney. p53 expression was decreased gradually and returned to basal levels at day 5. The second injection of CDDP also increased the number of p53-positive nuclei to a lesser extent. (C) The number of p21-positive nuclei was increased with two peaks at days 3 and 9. The significant increase in the number of p21-positive nuclei persisted until day 14. The subsequent injection of CDDP increased p21 expression further. The number of p21-positive nuclei 3 d after CDDP injection was significantly higher in rechallenged rats compared with single CDDP-treated animals. Data are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.01 versus day 0 in group 1; **, P < 0.05 versus day 0 in group 1; +, P < 0.01 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1; ++, P < 0.05 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1; #, P < 0.01 versus before CDDP injection in group 2; ##, P < 0.05 versus before CDDP injection in group 2.

 

No staining of nuclei for p53 and p21 was found in normal kidneys. CDDP significantly increased the number of p53- and p21-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (Figure 2, C and D). The number of p53-positive nuclei reached a peak at day 1 (6.16 ± 0.38/HPF, P<0.01 versus day 0) and disappeared by day 5 (Figure 3B). In contrast, the number of p21-positive nuclei had two peaks, at day 3 (2.17 ± 0.23/HPF, P<0.01 versus day 0) and day 9 (4.14 ± 0.35/HPF, P<0.01 versus day 0) (Figure 2E). A significant increase in p21-positive nuclei was sustained until 14 d after the injection of CDDP (Figure 3C). p21-positive nuclei were located mainly in the damaged cells at day 3 but in flat epithelial cells in regenerating tubules at day 9 (Figure 2E). No specific signal was noticed in the negative control sections (Figure 2G). p21 mRNA extracted from the CDDP-treated kidneys was detected as a 204-bp product by RT-PCR (Figure 4A). An increase in relative density of p21 mRNA divided by GAPDH mRNA became significant by day 2 and remained high until day 14 after the CDDP injection (Figure 4B).



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of immunostaining for in situ DNA nick end labeling (TUNEL; A and B), p53 (C), and p21 (D through F) in the outer stripe of the outer medulla in CDDP-induced acute renal failure (ARF) in rats. There were a significant number TUNEL-positive cells observed in the outer stripe of the outer medulla at day 5 after the first CDDP injection in group 1 (A). In contrast, a few of the TUNEL-positive cells could be found in the CDDP-pretreated kidney at day 5 (B). The peak number of p53- or p21-positive nuclei was observed in the outer stripe of the outer medulla at day 1 in group 1 (C) or at day 3 in group 1 (D), respectively. p21-positive nuclei were located mainly in the flat epithelial cells from tubules with a dilated lumen at day 9 (E) during the recovery phase of ARF. p21-positive nuclei were significantly increased in the outer stripe of the outer medulla 2 d after the second injection of CDDP in group 2 (F). No specific signal was observed in the negative control section (G). Magnification, x400.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. The changes in mRNA abundance of p21 in CDDP-induced ARF. Results are normalized individually to the glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression detected in each sample and are expressed as a ratio to GAPDH (B). A significant increase in PCR product was found at day 2 after CDDP injection and was sustained until day 14 (A). Lane M indicates size markers (1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, and 270 bp). Data are mean ± SEM obtained from three separate whole kidneys. *, P < 0.01 versus day 0; **, P < 0.01 versus day 0.

 

CDDP also induced two peaks of the increment of the number of PCNA-positive nuclei, at day 3 (11.01 ± 0.38/HPF, P < 0.01 versus day 0) and day 12 (10.25 ± 0.86/HPF, P < 0.01 versus day 0). The significant increase in PCNA expression was continued through day 14 (Figure 5A). In contrast, a significant increase in BrdU incorporation into the nuclei was not observed until day 5. A significant increase in BrdU incorporation began at day 5 and peaked at day 7 (8.42 ± 1.71/HPF, P < 0.01 versus day 0) and then gradually decreased through day 14 (Figure 5B).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Serial changes in the number of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive (A) and 5-bromo 2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated nuclei (B) in the outer stripe of the outer medulla. (A) A single injection of CDDP induced a significant increase in PCNA-positive nuclei. There were two peaks at 3 and 12 d. The subsequent CDDP treatment increased significantly the number of PCNA-stained tubular cells. (B) CDDP induced a significant increase in BrdU-incorporated nuclei with a peak at day 7. BrdU incorporation remained upregulated until day 14 (group 1). In contrast, the second injection of CDDP did not change BrdU incorporation into the tubular cells (group 2). Data are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.01 versus day 0 in group 1; **, P < 0.05 versus day 0 in group 1; +, P < 0.01 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1; ++, P < 0.05 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1; #, P < 0.01 versus before CDDP injection in group 2; ##, P < 0.05 versus before CDDP injection in group 2.

 

Rechallenge with CDDP Treatment
In group 2, the subsequent CDDP was given 14 d after the first CDDP injection at the time when Scr returned to normal values. The second CDDP injection also induced a significant increase in Scr, but the increase in Scr levels 5 d after the second injection of CDDP (group 2) was significantly less than those after the first injection (group 1, 1.70 ± 0.34 mg/dl; group 2, 0.98 ± 0.07 mg/dl; P < 0.05; Figure 1). Pretreatment with CDDP also significantly attenuated the CDDP-induced tubular damage score (3.91 ± 0.04 versus 2.16 ± 0.14, n = 8; P < 0.001). The number of TUNEL-positive cells at the time of CDDP injection was slightly increased in group 2 when compared with group 1 (group 1, 0.01 ± 0.01/HPF; group 2, 0.52 ± 0.28/HPF; P = NS). The second injection of CDDP did not induce further increases in the number of TUNEL-positive cells in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (Figure 2B, Figure 3A). The number of TUNEL-positive cells in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 at day 5 (P < 0.01; group 1, 6.24 ± 0.91; group 2, 0.30 ± 0.07/HPF; Figure 3A).

The number of p53-positive nuclei in group 2 was identical with those in normal rats at the time of injection. The second injection of CDDP significantly increased the number of p53-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla at day 1 (2.17 ± 0.37/HPF, P < 0.01, versus day 0 in group 2). This significant increase in p53 expression was also found at day 2 (2.62 ± 0.25/HPF, P < 0.01, versus day 0 in group 2) but disappeared by day 3. The increase in p53 expression in group 2 was significantly less than that in group 1 at days 1 and 2 (Figure 3B).

The increased number of p21-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla was still observed on the day of the second CDDP injection (Figure 3C). The second injection of CDDP increased further the p21 expression at day 2 (Figure 2F). Thus, the number of p21-positive nuclei in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 at days 0 through 2 (Figure 3C). The expression of p21 mRNA in kidneys on the day of the second CDDP injection was also significantly increased compared with normal kidneys (Figure 6). However, the second injection of CDDP did not induce any change in the expression of p21 mRNA. The degree of p21 mRNA expression at days 2 through 5 was similar between both groups (Figure 6).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. The changes of p21 mRNA expression in the kidney after CDDP injection. At day 0, a significant increase in p21 mRNA abundance was found in the kidney that was pretreated with CDDP. However, there was no difference in mRNA levels between both groups. Results are normalized individually to the GAPDH mRNA expression detected in each sample and are expressed as a ratio to GAPDH. Data are mean ± SEM obtained from three separate whole kidneys. *, P < 0.01 versus the same day after CDDP injection in group 1.

 

The numbers of PCNA- and BrdU-positive nuclei in the outer medulla before the second CDDP injection were higher than those in control rats. The number of PCNA-positive nuclei was also significantly increased by day 2 after the second CDDP injection (Figure 5A). The PCNA expression in group 2 was significantly higher than those in group 1 on days 0 through 2 (Figure 5A). In contrast, the number of BrdU-positive nuclei was significantly decreased at 5 d after the second CDDP injection in group 2 compared with those in group 1 (Figure 5B).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we showed that the injection of CDDP resulted in ARF manifested by an increase in Scr, histologic changes, and TUNEL-positive cells, which reached a peak at day 5 and returned to basal levels by day 14. Pretreatment with CDDP significantly attenuated the subsequent CDDP-induced increase in Scr. A single CDDP injection significantly increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells, the expression of p21, p21 mRNA, p53, and PCNA and BrdU incorporation. The second CDDP injection also induced increases in the expression of p21, p53, and PCNA but did not affect the number of TUNEL-positive cells, p21 mRNA expression, and BrdU incorporation. The time course of PCNA expression after the first CDDP injection differed from that of BrdU incorporation. The number of PCNA-positive nuclei was increased in the outer stripe of the outer medulla approximately twofold both at 2 to 3 d and at 9 to 14 d. In contrast, the increase in the BrdU-incorporated nuclei was observed between 5 to 14 d and reached a maximum at day 7. The number of positive nuclei for p21 and PCNA at days 1 and 2 was significantly greater in group 2 when compared with those after the first injection of CDDP.

The expression of p21 mRNA is usually limited in untreated adult animal kidney (11, 14) but upregulated after ischemia-and CDDP-induced renal injury (11). In this study, we also confirmed by RT-PCR analysis a faint expression of p21 mRNA in the kidney before CDDP injection. CDDP increased the amount of PCR products by day 2 and lasted until day 14 after the CDDP injection. The number of p21-positive nuclei was also increased in the outer stripe of the outer medulla 3 d after CDDP injection, and this significant increase was observed until day 14. These data suggest that CDDP upregulates the long-term expression of p21.

p21, which forms a quaternary complex with cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk), and PCNA (15), is a multifunctional protein that is involved in coordination of the cellular response to stress (11). p21 has been shown to inhibit one or more of the cyclin-cdk activities (16, 17), and the induction of p21 is associated with cell-cycle interruption and G1 arrest. PCNA plays a role in nucleotide excision DNA repair (18) in addition to its putative role in replicative DNA synthesis (7,8,9,10). p21 is reported to bind PCNA and inhibit the action of PCNA (15, 19, 20), especially the action in DNA replication (18). p21 itself does not inhibit the DNA repair action of PCNA (21). In this study, we demonstrated that CDDP injection induced a significant expression of p21 and PCNA in the outer stripe of the outer medulla by day 3. However, we could not find a significant increase in BrdU-positive nuclei, an S-phase marker (22), at this early phase, suggesting that the expression of PCNA observed at 3 d after CDDP injection may reflect a facilitation of DNA repair rather than cell proliferation. These observations also suggest that the increase in p21 in the early phase of CDDP-induced ARF may stop the cell cycle at the G1 phase and could inhibit the damaged tubular cells from entering to S phase, providing the time for DNA repair.

In the current study, we found a significant increase in p21-positive nuclei mainly in the flat epithelium of dilated tubules at the recovery phase of CDDP-induced ARF. Differentiating cells are known to express p21 and to manifest a prolongation of the G1 phase of the cell cycle and an inhibition of G1-S transition (23,24,25,26). The induction of p21 in cellular differentiation is coupled with the expression of early differentiation markers (26), suggesting that p21 protein may function as an inducible growth inhibitor that contributes to stopping the cell cycle and facilitating differentiation (24). The expression of p21 in differentiating cells is reported to be p53 independent (25, 26). In accordance with these findings, the expression of p21 during the recovery phase was not associated with the increase in p53-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla. Taken together, these findings suggest that p21 expression in the recovery phase of CDDP-induced ARF could play a role in the redifferentiation of the proliferating tubular cells in the damaged tubules via a p53-independent pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first study that showed the induction of p21 expression in the recovery phase of CDDP-induced ARF and the possible involvement of p21 in the differentiation of the damaged tubules.

It is known that prior ARF provides resistance to a subsequent rechallenge with renal insults (1, 2, 27). We recently found that rats that are recovering from ARF are functionally and morphologically resistant to CDDP (3, 4). Pretreatment with 2 mg/kg CDDP also affords a protective effect for subsequent 5 mg/kg CDDP nephrotoxicity (4). In accordance with these previous reports, the second injection of CDDP in group 2 was associated with the attenuated increase in Scr and less tubular damage. The numbers of p21- and PCNA-positive nuclei were increased in the outer stripe of the outer medulla after the second injection of CDDP in group 2, and the number of p21- and PCNA-positive nuclei were significantly higher than those in group 1 at days 1 through 3. The higher expression of PCNA after the second CDDP injection was associated with a significant suppression of BrdU incorporation, suggesting that this higher expression of PCNA did not indicate an increase in cell proliferation. These observations suggest the possibility that the increases in p21 and PCNA in group 2 may indicate enhanced DNA repair in damaged tubules and that p21 may contribute to the reduced amount of tubular damage in acquired resistance by stopping the cell cycle in the G1 phase and providing enough time for DNA repair.

Recent studies demonstrated the existence of apoptotic cell death in several ARF models induced by ischemia-reperfusion (5), uranium acetate (2), ureteral obstruction (11), and CDDP (3, 4). In our previous study, we found a close correlation between the numbers of TUNEL-positive cells and the degree of tubular damage and renal dysfunction (3), suggesting an important role of apoptotic cell death in the development of CDDP-induced ARF. However, the exact mechanism for the induction of apoptosis in ARF is not clear. In addition to several molecules, including the Bc1-2 family (28) and Fas (29), p53 is known to be a key protein of apoptotic cell death (30, 31). The expression of p53 in the kidney was shown by 24 h after CDDP injection in mice (12). In our study, the number of p53-positive nuclei was increased transiently between days 1 and 3 after CDDP injection, followed by the expression of TUNEL-positive cells. Furthermore, the reduced induction of p53-positive nuclei after the second CDDP injection in group 2 was associated with the suppression of the increase in TUNEL-positive cells. Thus, it is possible that, in part, p53 may play a role in the induction of apoptosis in CDDP-induced ARF.

It is also demonstrated that the cdk inhibitor, p21, can inhibit apoptosis in C2C12 myocyte (32) and human breast epithelial cells (33). In the current study, we found that the induction of p21 by the pretreatment with CDDP significantly attenuated the increase in TUNEL-positive cells after the second injection of CDDP in group 2, suggesting that p21 plays a role in the modulation of CDDP-induced apoptotic cell death. In agreement with this hypothesis, Megyesi et al. (13) reported that CDDP-induced renal dysfunction, tubular damage, and the number of TUNEL-positive cells were significantly greater in mice homozygous for the p21 deletion than wild-type litter mates. In rats that are recovering from previous CDDP-induced ARF, antiapoptotic protein, Bcl-2, is also overexpressed (3). However, it is not known which of these antiapoptotic factors (Bcl-2 and p21) is more important in the acquisition of resistance to the rechallenge injury, and the relationship between p21 and Bcl-2 expression also remains to be clarified.

In case of DNA damage, the p21 gene is induced both by p53-dependent (34,35,36) and p53-independent (14, 37, 38) pathways. Megyesi et al. (12) demonstrated by using p53 knockout mice that CDDP injection induced high levels of p21 mRNA in kidneys through both p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways. In our study, p21 protein and mRNA expression shortly after the first CDDP injection were provoked following the increment of p53, a compatible finding by Megyesi et al. (12). The increase in p21-positive nuclei observed 2 d after the second CDDP injection was also preceded by the increase in p53-positive nuclei. However, this increment of p21 protein after the second CDDP injection was not associated with the increase in mRNA level. The reasons for this unchanged mRNA level after the second CDDP attack remain unknown. Immunohistochemical examination revealed a similar positive staining of p21 in tubular nuclei mainly located in the outer stripe of the outer medulla as well as single CDDP injection. Interestingly, Gorospe et al. (11) reported that p21 expression in DNA injury was regulated through a posttranscriptional mechanism including stabilization of p21 mRNA and that this induction was also dependent on the presence of functional p53. Thus, it is possible that the expression of p21-positive nuclei in group 2, which was associated with the increased expression of p53 but not with the increase in p21 mRNA, may be regulated through a posttranscriptional mechanism. We, however, used whole kidney to evaluate the changes in p21 mRNA in the current study; therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that a small increase in p21 mRNA, which might cause the increased p21 protein in rechallenge injury, was missed. The increase in p21 expression during the recovery phase was not associated with an increased expression of p53 in the kidney. This finding is in agreement with previous reports, which showed that the expression of p21 in differentiating cells was p53 independent (23, 24).

In conclusion, CDDP injection induced an increase in the number of p21-positive nuclei in the outer stripe of the outer medulla and the expression of p21 mRNA in the kidneys. The increase in p21, which was induced by p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways, might contribute to the DNA repair and redifferentiation in damaged tubules in CDDP-induced ARF. The acquired resistance to CDDP in rechallenge injury might be mediated in part by the increase in p21.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Jeff M. Sands (Emory University, Atlanta, GA) for his critical reading of this manuscript. We also thank Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing CDDP. Portions of this work were presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology held at Miami Beach, November 5 to 8, 1999. This work was supported by a research grant sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture in Japan.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Honda N, Sudo M: Resistance to uranyl-acetate-induced acute renal failure in rabbits: Renal function and morphology. In: Acute Renal Failure, edited by Eliahou HE, London, John Libbet,1982 , pp 105-107
  2. Sano K, Fujigaki Y, Miyaji T, Ikegaya N, Ohishi K, Yonemura K, Hishida A: Role of apoptosis in uranyl acetate-induced acute renal failure and acquired resistance to uranyl acetate. Kidney Int57 : 1560-1570,2000[Medline]
  3. Zhou H, Miyaji T, Kato A, Fujigaki Y, Sano K, Hishida A: Attenuation of cisplatin-induced acute renal failure is associated with the less apoptotic cell death. J Lab Clin Med34 : 649-658,1999
  4. Ming CJ, Ohishi K, Yonemura K, Hishida A: Acquired resistance to acute renal failure in cisplatin-induced renal failure of rats. Jpn J Nephrol 39:728 -733, 1997
  5. Nakajima T, Miyaji T, Kato A, Ikegaya N, Yamamoto T, Hishida A: Uninephrectomy reduces apoptotic cell death and enhances renal tubular cell regeneration in ischemic acute renal failure in rats. Am J Physiol 271:F846 -F853, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Miyachi K, Fritzler MJ, Tan EM: Autoantibody to a nuclear antigen in proliferating cells. J Immunol121 : 2228-2234,1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. McCormick D, Hall PA: The complexities of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Histopathology21 : 591-594,1992[Medline]
  8. Barnes DM, Gillett CE: Determination of cell proliferation. J Clin Pathol 48:M2 -M5, 1994
  9. Gillett CE, Barnes DM, Camplejohn RS: Comparison of three cell cycle associated antigens as markers of proliferative activity and prognosis in breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol46 : 1126-1128,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Celis JE, Madsen P: Increased nuclear cyclin/PCNA antigen staining of non S-phase transformed human amnion cells engaged in nucleotide excision DNA repair. FEBS Lett 209:277 -283, 1986[Medline]
  11. Gorospe M, Wang X, Holbrook NJ: Functional role of p21 during the cellular response to stress. Gene Expr7 : 377-385,1999[Medline]
  12. Megyesi J, Udvarhelyi N, Safirstein RL, Price PM: The p53-independent activation of transcription of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 after acute renal failure. Am J Physiol271 : F1211-F1216,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Megyesi J, Safirstein RL, Price PM: Induction of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 in kidney tubule cells affects the course of cisplatin-induced acute renal failure. J Clin Invest101 : 777-782,1998[Medline]
  14. Macleod KF, Sherry N, Hannon G, Beach D, Tokino T, Kinzler K, Vogelstein B, Jacks T: p53-dependent and independent expression of p21 during cell growth, differentiation and DNA damage. Genes Dev9 : 935-944,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Xiong Y, Zhang H, Beach D: D type cyclins associate with multiple protein kinases and the DNA replication and repair factor PCNA. Cell 71:505 -514, 1992[Medline]
  16. Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ: The p21 cdk-interacting protein cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75:805 -816, 1993[Medline]
  17. Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R, Beach D: p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature366 : 701-704,1993[Medline]
  18. Shivji MKK, Kenny MK, Wood RD: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for DNA excision repair. Cell69 : 367-374,1992[Medline]
  19. Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B: The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replication by interaction with PCNA. Nature 369:574 -578, 1994[Medline]
  20. Flores-Rozas H, Kelman Z, Dean FB, Pan ZQ, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, O'Donnell PM, Hurwitz J: Cdk-interacting protein 1 directly binds with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and inhibits DNA replication catalyzed by the DNA polymerase {delta} holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8655 -8659, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Li R, Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B: Differential effects by the p21 CDK inhibitor on PCNA-dependent DNA replication and repair. Nature 371:534 -537, 1994[Medline]
  22. Gratzner HG: Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-indodeoxyuridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 218:474 -475, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Halevy O, Novitch BG, Spicer DB, Skapek SX, Rhee J, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Lassar AB: Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD. Science267 : 1018-1021,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Parker SB, Eichele G, Zhang P, Rawls A, Sands AT, Bradley A, Olson EN, Harper JW, Elledge SJ: p53-independent expression of p21CIP1: In muscle and other terminally differentiating cells. Science 267:1024 -1027, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Skapek SX, Rhee J, Spicer DB, Lassar AB: Inhibition of myogenic differentiation in proliferating myoblasts by cyclin D1-dependent kinase. Science 267:1022 -1024, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Steinman RA, Hoffman B, Iro A, Guillouf C, Liebermann DA, El-Houseini ME: Induction of p21 (WAF1/CIP1) during differentiation. Oncogene 9:3389 -3396, 1994[Medline]
  27. Honda N, Hishida A, Ikuma K, Yonemura K: Acquired resistance to acute renal failure. Kidney Int31 : 1233-1238,1987[Medline]
  28. Basile DP, Liapis H, Hammerman MR: Expression of bcl-2 and bax in regenerating rat renal tubules following ischemic injury. Am J Physiol 272:F640 -F647, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nogae S, Miyazaki M, Kobayashi N, Saito T, Abe K, Saito H, Nakane PK, Nakanishi Y, Koji T: Induction of apoptosis in ischemia-reperfusion model of mouse kidney: Possible involvement of Fas. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:620 -631, 1997[Abstract]
  30. Lowe SW, Schmitt EM, Smith SW, Osborne BA, Jacks T: p53 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes. Nature 362:847 -849, 1993[Medline]
  31. Shaw P, Bovey R, Tardy S, Sahli R, Sordat B, Costa J: Induction of apoptosis by wild-type p53 in a human colon tumor-derived cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4495 -4499, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wang J, Walsh K: Resistance to apoptosis conferred by cdk inhibitors during myocyte differentiation. Science273 : 359-361,1996[Abstract]
  33. Kim HRC, Lin HM, Biliran H, Raz A: Cell cycle arrest and inhibition of anoikis by galectin-3 in human breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res 59:4148 -4154, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. El-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817 -825, 1993[Medline]
  35. El-Deiry WS, Harper JW, O'Connor PM, Velculescu VE, Canman CE, Jackman J, Pietenpol JA, Burrell M, Hill DE, Wang Y, Wiman KG, Mercer WE, Kastan MB, Kohn KW, Elledge SJ, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: WAF1/CIP1 is induced in p53-mediated G1 arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res54 : 1169-1174,1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dulic V, Kaufmann WK, Wilson SJ, Tlsty TD, Lees E, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Reed SI: p53-dependent inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activities in human fibroblasts during radiation-induced G1 arrest. Cell 76:1013 -1023, 1994[Medline]
  37. Butz K, Geisen C, Ullmann A, Zentgraf H, Hoppe-Seyler F: Uncoupling of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 mRNA and protein expression upon genotoxic stress. Oncogene 17:781 -787, 1998[Medline]
  38. Michieli P, Chedid M, Lin D, Pierce JH, Mercer WE, Givol D: Induction of WAF1/CIP1 by a p53-independent pathway. Cancer Res 54:3391 -3395, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication June 7, 2000. Accepted for publication November 1, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. Jiang and Z. Dong
Regulation and Pathological Role of p53 in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2008; 327(2): 300 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Luo, T. Tsuji, H. Yasuda, Y. Sun, Y. Fujigaki, and A. Hishida
The molecular mechanisms of the attenuation of cisplatin-induced acute renal failure by N-acetylcysteine in rats
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2198 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
F. Yu, J. Megyesi, R. L. Safirstein, and P. M. Price
Involvement of the CDK2-E2F1 pathway in cisplatin cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F52 - F59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. Zhou, Y. Fujigaki, A. Kato, T. Miyaji, H. Yasuda, T. Tsuji, T. Yamamoto, K. Yonemura, and A. Hishida
Inhibition of p21 modifies the response of cortical proximal tubules to cisplatin in rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): F225 - F235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
E. Crescenzi, A. Chiaviello, G. Canti, E. Reddi, B. M. Veneziani, and G. Palumbo
Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer cells (H1299).
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 776 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. Megyesi, L. Andrade, J. M. Vieira Jr., R. L. Safirstein, and P. M. Price
Coordination of the cell cycle is an important determinant of the syndrome of acute renal failure
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): F810 - F816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MIYAJI, T.
Right arrow Articles by HISHIDA, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MIYAJI, T.
Right arrow Articles by HISHIDA, A.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP