Cell-Surface Expression of the Channel Activating Protease xCAP-1 Is Required for Activation of ENaC in the Xenopus Oocyte
Véronique Vallet*,
Corinne Pfister*,
Johannes Loffing and
Bernard C. Rossier*
*Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; and Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Correspondence to: Prof. Bernard C. Rossier, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Toxicologie, Rue du Bugnon 27, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. Phone: +4121-692-5351; Fax: +4121-692-5355; E-mail: Bernard.Rossier{at}ipharm.unil.ch
ABSTRACT. Sodium balance, extracellular fluid volume, and ultimatelyBP are maintained by precise regulation of the activity of theepithelial sodium channel (ENaC). Using a functional complementationassay in the Xenopuslaevis oocyte expression system, a channel-activatingprotease (CAP-1) that increases ENaC activity two to threefoldin the Xenopus oocyte expression system is here identified.External application of trypsin mimics the effect of XenopusCAP-1 (xCAP-1) on ENaC activity, which can be blocked by aprotinin,a serine protease inhibitor, suggesting the existence of a novelextracellular pathway for controlling ENaC activity. Sequenceanalysis predicts that CAP-1 is a secreted and/or glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol(GPI)-anchored protein. The aim of the present study was todetermine whether cell-surface expression of xCAP-1 is requiredfor ENaC activation. By site-directed mutagenesis of xCAP-1,the importance of the catalytic site, N-glycosylation, and theGPI anchor of xCAP-1 on ENaC activity were analyzed. Glycosylationor catalytic activity is not required for cell-surface expressionof xCAP-1, whereas the deletion of the GPI anchor consensusmotif at the C-terminus of xCAP-1 (G305Stop) abolishes cell-surfaceexpression and ENaC activation. G305Stop-mutated xCAP-1 is recoveredas a secreted protein in the external medium. A catalytic mutantof xCAP-1 significantly decreased ENaC activation but did notfully abolish the effect of xCAP-1. The data indicate the criticalrole of the GPI anchor in ENaC activation and suggest that catalyticand noncatalytic mechanisms are involved.
The epithelial amiloride-sensitive sodium channel (ENaC) isexpressed at the apical membrane of the epithelial cells ofaldosterone-sensitive organs, such as the kidney, the colon,and the sweat and salivary glands (1). In the kidney, ENaC mediatesthe aldosterone-dependent sodium reabsorption in the distalpart of the nephron, thereby playing a major role in the controlof sodium balance and BP. We have recently identified a Xenopusserine protease (xCAP-1) that increases ENaC activity when coexpressedwith ENaC , ß, and subunits in the Xenopus oocyte(2,3). The analysis of xCAP-1 primary sequence indicates thatthis protein is a serine protease with its characteristic histidine-aspartate-serinecatalytic triad (HDS). The sequence analysis predicts one asparagine-linkedglycosylation site and a glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI)consensus motif, indicating that the protein may be anchoredat the outer leaflet of the membrane bilayer (4). This observationsuggests that xCAP-1 activates ENaC by its extracellular serineprotease activity at the plasma membrane. In addition, patchclamp experiments have shown that extracellular applicationof trypsin inside the pipette can mimic xCAP-1 activation whiletrypsin outside the pipette is unable to activate ENaC (5).Overall, the data suggest that xCAP-1 is colocalized with ENaCchannel protein and that the serine protease acts directly onENaC by its catalytic activity and/or by protein-protein interactionwith the extracellular domain of ENaC or an associated protein.
The aim of this study was to elucidate structural features ofxCAP-1 that are important for ENaC activation in the Xenopusoocyte system. Site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic triad,the N-glycosylation site, and the GPI-anchored motif demonstratethe critical role of the GPI anchor to observe ENaC activationat the plasma membrane.
cDNA Constructs and cRNA Synthesis
Cloning of xCAP-1 into pSPORT-1 vector has been performed asdescribed (3). For this study, xCAP-1 cDNA was subcloned intopSD5 expression vector by using NotI-SalI sites. The Flag epitope(DYKDDDDK) was inserted between serine 196 and aspartic acid197 into xCAP-1 cDNA to generate a flagged xCAP-1 reporter constructreferred to as wild type (WT) xCAP-1. Preliminary experimentsshowed that flagged xCAP-1 produced the same ENaC activationwhen compared with nonflagged wild type constructs. Three mutantswere generated by introducing a single amino acid replacementinto flagged xCAP-1 sequence: (1) a catalytic mutant (S223A)in which the codon for the predicted active serine residue (ACC)of the catalytic triad (S223) was mutated to an alanine codon(GCC); (2) a glycosylation mutant (N288Q) in which the asparaginecodon (AAC) for the predicted N-glycosylation site (N288) wasmutated into a glutamine codon (CAG); and (3) a GPI-anchor mutant(G305Stop) in which the C-terminal hydrophobic tail of xCAP-1was deleted by introducing a STOP codon (TGA) instead of theglycin (GGA) G305 residue. The introduction of the Flag epitopeor the point mutations was done by PCR. Accuracy of each constructwas confirmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmids were linearized byusing FspI restriction enzyme, and complementary cRNAs weretranscribed by using SP6 RNA polymerase. Xenopus ENaC (ENaC)subunits were cloned into pSD5 expression vector, as describedpreviously (6). Plasmids were linearized by using AflIII enzymefor and ENaC subunits and BglII for ß subunit.
Expression in Xenopus Oocytes
Stage V to VI oocytes of Xenopus laevis were injected with 100nl containing 1 ng of each , ß and ENaC cRNA subunit(7), together with 2 ng of wild type or mutant xCAP-1 cRNA.Oocytes were either kept in modified Barth saline (MBS: 88 mMNaCl, 1.0 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 0.41 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM CaNO3,0.82 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) for electrophysiologic measurementsand immunoprecipitation experiments or in low-sodium MBS (10mM NaCl, 90 mM NMDG-Cl, 5 mM KCl, 0.41 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM CaNO3,0.82 mM MgSO4) for binding experiments. To inhibit N-glycosylation,oocytes were preinjected with 100 nl of tunicamycin (40 ng/µlin 4% DMSO) 24 h before cRNA injection. The other inhibitorswere coinjected with cRNA by dissolving cRNA in 100 µMcastanospermine, 100 µM 1-deoxymannojirimycin, or 100µM swainsonine. Each oocyte was injected with 100 nl inhibitorcontaining cRNA.
Electrophysiologic Measurements
Standard electrophysiologic measurements were performed 16 to20 h after injection as described previously. The amiloride-sensitivesodium current was determined by using two-electrode voltage-clampas described previously (7). Macroscopic amiloride-sensitivesodium current (Iam) is defined as the difference between theinward current obtained in the absence and in the presence (5µM) of amiloride in the bath at a holding potential of-100 mV. For each oocyte, Iam was measured before and afterperfusion of 2 µg/ml trypsin during 2 min in the bath.Results are reported as mean ± SE.
Cell-Surface Expression of xCAP-1
Anti-Flag (M2Ab) monoclonal antibody (Eastman Kodak, Rochester,NY) was iodinated by using the IODO-BEADS Iodination reagent(Pierce, Rockford, IL) and carrier-free Na (125)I (AmershamPharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), according to the Pierce protocol.The cell-surface expression of wild type or mutant xCAP-1 wasdetermined by specific binding of iodinated M2Ab antibody 16to 20 h after the cRNA injection to oocytes expressing flaggedxCAP-1 constructs as described previously (8). Briefly, oocyteswere incubated with iodinated anti-Flag antibody, washed eighttimes with low-sodium MBS, and then transferred individuallyinto tubes for counting.
Immunoprecipitation Experiments
Injected oocytes were incubated 16 h in MBS containing 1 mCi/ml[35S]methionine (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). Microsomalmembranes were prepared as described (9), and xCAP-1 flaggedprotein was immunoprecipitated by using the anti-Flag M2Ab antibodyunder nondenaturing conditions. Microsomal proteins solubilizedin a triton washing buffer (TWB: 20 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 100 mMNaCl, 1% TX-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF],leupeptin, antipain, pepstatin A [Sigma, St. Louis, MO] [LAP])were incubated for 16 h at 4°C with M2Ab antibody, and immunoprecipitateswere recovered with protein G-agarose-conjugated beads and washedthree times with TWB and twice with TWB devoid of TX-100. Deglycosylationof the proteins was performed by incubating the beads for 1h at 37°C in 100 µl of 50 mM sodium acetate containingeither 1000 units of endoglycosidase H or 500 units N-glycosidaseF. Immunoprecipitates were separated on a 5 to 13% gradientsodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel, and the gel was exposedfor 4 to 7 d on Kodak XS film.
Immunohistochemical Detection of xCAP-1 in Xenopus Oocytes
Forty-eight hours after cRNA injection, oocytes were fixed with3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 4 h at 4°C. Tyramide signalamplification kit (TSA-Direct, NEN) was used for immunofluorescenceaccording to the manufacturers instructions. Cryosectionsof the oocytes (6-µm thick) were placed on chrome alumgelatin-coated glass slides and incubated with a 1:100 dilutionof an anti-Flag M2Ab antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Afterrepeated washings, sections were incubated for 1 h at room temperaturewith a 1:100 dilution of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugatedsheep anti-mouse IgG (Amersham Pharmacia) and subsequently revealedby incubation for 10 min with a 1:75 dilution of the providedfluorescein-tyramide conjugates. To stain F actin, a 1:50 dilutionof rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene,OR) was added to the amplification buffer. Sections were thenwashed, mounted in DAKO-glycergel (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark)containing 2.5% 1,4-diazabicyclo(2,2,2)octane to retard fading,and were studied by epifluorescence with a Polyvar microscope(Reichert-Jung, Vienna, Austria). Micrographs were acquiredwith a charge-coupled device camera (Visicam 1280, VisitronSystems, Puchheim, Germany) and processed by Image-Pro Plussoftware (version 3.0; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
Primary sequence of xCAP-1 predicts the following importantfeatures (Figure 1). The N-terminus contains a signal sequence(SS) formed by 17 hydrophobic residues. Three amino acids expectedto form the classical catalytic triad (HDS) of serine proteasesare observed: histidine 70 (H70), aspartate 119 (D119), andserine 223 (S223). A putative N-glycosylation site is presentat position 288 (N288). The C-terminus contains a 23-residuelong hydrophobic tail, which is consistent with a GPI-anchoredsignal (4). The aim of this study was to determine if any ofthese structural features of xCAP-1 are important for ENaC activation.For this purpose, the catalytic activity of xCAP-1 was inactivatedby mutating the serine 223 of the catalytic triad into an alanine(S223A mutant); a nonglycosylated mutant was generated by mutatingthe asparagine 288 site into a glutamine (N288Q mutant); theC-terminal hydrophobic tail was deleted by mutating the glycine305 into a STOP codon to prevent the GPI-anchoring of the protein(G305Stop mutant). Each mutant was expressed in Xenopus oocytesand analyzed for its glycosylation status, its subcellular localization,and its effect on ENaC activity.
Figure 1. Linear model and functional properties of Xenopus channel-activating protease (xCAP-1) mutants and schematic structure of xCAP-1 protein. The amino acids of the catalytic triad (*), the N-glycosylation site (), and the position of the Flag insertion (DYKDDDDK) are indicated. Gray boxes represent hydrophobic sequences; SS, signal sequence; PM, plasma membrane. Results of the experiments performed in this article are summarized for each mutant. Activity means the ability of xCAP-1 protein to increase ENaC activity by coexpression in Xenopus oocytes.
xCAP-1 Is N-Glycosylated
When expressed in oocytes, wild type xCAP-1 (WT) migrates withan apparent Mr of 40 kD. Digestion with endoglycosidase H (EndoH)or with N-glycosidase F (PNGase or EndoF) reduced the apparentMr to 38 kD (Figure 2). Using a pulse-chase experiment (16 hpulse and 24 h chase), we did not observe the appearance ofan EndoH-resistant, fully-glycosylated, form of xCAP-1 (notshown). These results indicate that xCAP-1 expresses only oneN-glycosylation site, which is core-glycosylated. The S223Amutant exhibited the same apparent molecular mass as WT proteinand is sensitive to EndoH and PNGase. Thus, the S223A mutantis N-glycosylated, and a mutation in the catalytic triad doesnot interfere with N-glycosylation of the protein. The N288Qmutant migrates with an apparent molecular mass of 38 kD andwas not sensitive to EndoH or PNGase (EndoF) (Figure 2), indicatingthat this mutant is not N-glycosylated, identifying asparagine288 residue as the unique N-glycosylation site of xCAP-1. TheG305Stop mutant exhibited the same glycosylation profile asthe N288Q mutant. Thus, deletion of the C-terminal hydrophobictail of xCAP-1 impairs the glycosylation at the position 288of the G305Stop-truncated protein.
Figure 2. Effects of endoglycosidase H (EndoH) and N-glycosidase F (PNGase [EndoF]) treatment on the electrophoretic mobility of xCAP-1. Injected oocytes were pulse-labeled for 16 h with modified Barth saline (MBS) containing 100 µCi/ml [35S]methionine. Microsomal membranes were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag antibody. Immunoprecipitates were digested with EndoH or PNGase before gel loading. Migration positions of the size markers are indicated on the left.
xCAP-1 can be deglycosylated by EndoH, indicating that N288glycosylation site is occupied by mannose-rich oligosaccharides.To test the N-glycosylation pathway of xCAP-1, we used differentinhibitors of N-glycosylation: tunicamycin (TUN), which blocksthe N-acetyl-glucosaminyltransferase involved in the first stepon N-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum (core-glycosylation),castanospermine (CST), 1-deoxymannojirimycin (DMJ), and swainsonine(SW), which inhibit glucosidase I and -mannosidase I and II,respectively. These three enzymes participate in the processingof core-glycosylated proteins into fully-glycosylated proteinsin the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. As shownin Figure 3, we observed that tunicamycin prevents glycosylationof xCAP-1. However, when castanospermine, deoxymannojirimycin,or swainsonine were injected, xCAP-1 was still glycosylated.The three inhibitors are, however, active, because they preventfull glycosylation of the ß subunit of the Na,K-ATPaseused as a positive control (not shown). xCAP-1 is monoglycosylated;therefore, gel resolution is not sensitive enough to determinewhether the glycosylated form of xCAP-1 has been processed inthe presence of castanospermine, deoxymannojirimycin, or swainsonine.However these forms are EndoH-sensitive, confirming that theyare mannose-rich core-glycosylated forms and have not been processedthrough the usual Golgi pathway.
Figure 3. Effects of inhibitors of N-glycosylation on wild type (WT) xCAP-1 N-glycosylation. Oocytes were injected with WT xCAP-1 cRNA diluted in either tunicamycine (TUN), castanospermine (CST), 1-deoxymannojirimycin (DMJ), or swainsonine (SW). After immunoprecipitation, proteins were either treated with EndoH or not to identify glycosylated and nonglycosylated forms of xCAP-1.
Cell-Surface Expression of xCAP-1
Analysis of primary sequence indicates that xCAP-1 possessesa N-terminal hydrophobic signal peptide, which would allow thesecretion of the protease in the external medium. A C-terminalhydrophobic tail precedes a consensus motif, predicting a GPI-anchorto the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane (2,4). We used animmunofluorescence assay and a binding assay to test the localizationof xCAP-1 in Xenopus oocytes. Oocytes injected with WT xCAP-1exhibited a bright immunofluorescent signal at the plasma membrane,which colocalizes with actin staining (Figure 4A). This indicatesthat the majority of the the Flag-tagged protein is expressedat the cell surface. A diffuse staining under the plasma membraneis sometimes observed (Figure 4B) but not seen reproduciblyin other experiments using different batches of oocytes. Oocytesexpressing the S223A (Figure 4B) and N288Q (Figure 4B) mutantsexhibited a similar signal at the plasma membrane. G305Stop-injectedoocytes (Figure 4B) showed no immunofluorescence signal forxCAP-1 and were identical to noninjected oocytes. This indicatesthat the G305Stop mutant is not anchored into the plasma membraneand/or is not accumulated in intracellular compartments. Bindingexperiments, using an iodinated anti-Flag antibody, allow forthe quantification of cell-surface, membrane-bound expressionof xCAP-1-flagged protein. As shown in Figure 5, oocytes injectedwith WT xCAP-1 exhibited a strong binding of the anti-Flag antibody(0.31 ± 0.03 fmol/oocyte versus noninjected oocytes,0.07 ± 0.005 fmol/oocyte; P < 0.0001). Similarly,S223A and N288Q mutants exhibited a highly significant bindingof the anti-Flag antibody (0.40 ± 0.04 fmol/oocyte and0.41 ± 0.03 fmol/oocyte, respectively). Thus, this indicatesthat WT, S223A, and N288Q xCAP-1 proteins are expressed at thecell surface and are bound to the membrane. On the other hand,the G305Stop mutant is not detectable at the cell surface (0.07± 0.003 fmol/oocyte, NS versus noninjected oocytes).This confirms the immunofluorescence observations indicatingthat the G305Stop mutant is not present at the plasma membrane.Immunofluorescence studies and binding assays were also performedon oocytes injected with xCAP-1 alone as well as with xCAP-1plus ENaC. Whether ENaC is coexpressed with xCAP-1 or not, nodifference in immunostaining of xCAP-1 was observed (data notshown). Thus ENaC does not interfere with the targeting and/orcell surface expression of xCAP-1.
Figure 4. Cell surface expression of xCAP-1 by immunofluorescence. (A) Immunofluorescence on cryosections of noninjected versus flagged xCAP-1 injected oocytes. Detection of FLAG-tagged xCAP-1 with an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody and of microvillar F actin with rhodamin-conjugated phalloidin. (B) Immunocytochemical detection of FLAG-tagged xCAP-1 in WT, S223A, N288Q, or G305Stop xCAP-1-injected oocytes. Scale bars, 40 µm.
Figure 5. Cell-surface expression by binding to flagged xCAP-1. Iodinated anti-Flag-binding assay on flagged xCAP-1 constructs-injected oocytes. Cell-surface expression of xCAP-1 was determined by using the 125I-labeled anti-Flag M2Ab antibody and expressed as femtomol per oocyte. Each bar represents the mean of two experiments in which the radioactivity bound to 6 to 10 individual oocytes have been counted for each condition.
To determine whether G305Stop xCAP-1 is secreted, immunoprecipitationof the incubation medium was carried out. As shown in Figure 6,we observed an accumulation of xCAP-1 protein in the incubationmedium of G305Stop-injected oocytes, whereas no protein is detectedin WT-, S223A- or N288Q-injected oocytes. This indicates thatG305Stop xCAP-1 protein is a secreted protein. Taken together,these results showed that xCAP-1 is an extracellular membrane-boundprotein and that its membrane anchoring needs the presence ofits C-terminal hydrophobic tail. On the other hand, the extracellularmembrane localization of xCAP-1 does not require serine proteasecatalytic activity or N-glycosylation of the protein. The mutantlacking the GPI-anchor domain (G305Stop mutant) is not glycosylated,is not detected at the cell surface, and has no effect on ENaCactivity (see below). The reason that the G305Stop mutant isnot glycosylated is unknown. The STOP codon has been insertedclose to the N-glycosylation site (17 amino acids), and theN-glycosylation site is probably hidden in the conformationof the truncated C-terminal tail. Whatever the mechanism mightbe, the lack of N-glycosylation of the G305Stop mutant cannotexplain its loss of activity because the nonglycosylated N288Qmutant is as active as wild type (see below).
Figure 6. Immunoprecipitation on MBS-conditioned medium. Injected oocytes were incubated for 16 h in 100 µl of MBS medium containing [35S]methionine. MBS was then recovered, clarified by 10,000-rpm centrifugation, and submitted to immunoprecipitation by using anti-Flag antibody.
Activation of ENaC by xCAP-1 Requires the Presence of the GPI Anchor
Finally, we have analyzed the functional properties of WT xCAP-1and mutants by testing their ability to increase ENaC activity.ENaC activity was measured by two-electrode voltage clamp asan amiloride-sensitive sodium current (Iam). The results areshown in Figure 7. When ENaC is expressed alone, the oocytesexhibit a low Iam, which is greatly increased (10.6-fold) aftertrypsin perfusion (control, 61.3 ± 5.4 nA versus trypsin,651.3 ± 51.6 nA; P < 0.001) as described previously(2,5). When WT xCAP-1 is coexpressed together with ENaC, thebasal Iam is 8.5-fold higher than in the absence of xCAP-1 (524± 79.3 nA with xCAP-1 versus 61.3 ± 5.4 nA; P< 0.001). Perfusion of trypsin induces a small (1.9-fold)increase of Iam (524 ± 79.3 nA versus 1000.7 ±142.7 nA; P < 0.01), indicating that the presence of xCAP-1achieves most of the activating effect of trypsin. These resultsare similar to those previously observed (2). They also indicatethat insertion of the Flag epitope into the xCAP-1 sequencedoes not impair the activating effect of xCAP-1 on ENaC. Wethen tested the activity of the different xCAP-1 mutants. Weobserved that the N288Q mutant behaves like the WT protein byincreasing basal ENaC activity and competing for the actionof trypsin (control, 578.2 ± 110.2 nA versus trypsin,980.9 ± 216.6 nA; 1.7-fold). This result indicates thatN-glycosylation of xCAP-1 is not necessary for activation ofENaC. The catalytic mutant, S223A, greatly diminishes the abilityto activate ENaC but surprisingly did not abolish it completely(61.3 ± 5.4 versus 147.7 ± 23.0 nA; P < 0.01).Trypsin induced a 7.7-fold increase in ENaC activity (1339.3± 162.5 nA versus 147.7 ± 23.0; P < 0.001),indicating that the S223A mutant is greatly impaired in itsability to activate ENaC. Similar results were obtained whenthe two other residues of the catalytic triad were mutated (H70Aor D119A) (data not shown). Finally, the G305Stop mutant wasunable to significantly increase (+30%) basal ENaC activity(89.2 ± 16.0 nA versus 61.3 ± 5.4; NS), whereastrypsin was still able to increase ENaC activity 8.4-fold (746.7± 117.4 nA versus 89.2 ± 16 nA; P < 0.001).This result indicates that the C-terminal tail of xCAP-1 isnecessary for channel activation. The G305Stop mutant is notproperly expressed at the cell surface but rather secreted inthe medium; therefore, our data suggest that a colocalizationof xCAP-1 with ENaC at the plasma membrane is critical for ENaCactivation.
Figure 7. Functional properties of xCAP-1 on ENaC activity. Oocytes were coinjected with cRNA encoding the three subunits of ENaC and one of the xCAP-1 mutant. Absolute values of amiloride-sensitive sodium current (Iam) measured before (-) and after (+) 2-min trypsin perfusion (2 µg/ml) of the oocyte. Each bar represents the mean of two experiments (two different batches of oocytes) in which 8 to 10 oocytes have been measured for each condition.
CAP-1 is a serine protease that increases ENaC activity whencoexpressed in Xenopus oocytes. In this article, we have analyzedsome features of xCAP-1 (proteolytic activity, glycosylation,membrane-anchoring) and their influence on the effect of xCAP-1on ENaC activity. The data are summarized in Figure 1.
ENaC Activation: Importance of the Catalytic Site
Members of the serine protease family are characterized by atypical HDS catalytic triad containing a histidine, an aspartate,and a serine. Mutation of any of these residues abolishes theproteolytic activity of the protease (10). When the proteolyticactivity of xCAP-1 is abolished by mutating the serine residueof the catalytic triad (S223A mutant), the protein is stillglycosylated and expressed at the cell surface, but it losesabout 90% of its effect on ENaC activity. This confirms ourprevious results from experiments using the inhibitor aprotininand suggesting that xCAP-1 acts through its proteolytic activityto increase ENaC activity (2). Similar conclusions were drawnfrom experiments performed on a kidney cell line (2,5). It appears,however, that a small (approximately 10%), but statisticallysignificant, fraction of ENaC activation by xCAP-1 cannot beexplained by its catalytic activity. The mechanism is not known,but it could involve protein-protein interaction. Serine proteasescan interact with serine protease inhibitors, such as aprotinineexpressing a Kunitz domain or other serine protease inhibitorsexpressing WAP-type 4 disulfide core domain (11). The mouseorthologue (mCAP-1) of xCAP-1 has been identified in a corticalcollecting duct cell line (12). A rat orthologue (i.e., ratprostasin) (13) has also been recently reported. Mouse CAP-1shares many biologic properties with xCAP-1. The correspondingcatalytic mouse mutant, however, diminishes ENaC activationby only 40 to 50%. Interestingly, in the same cell line, wehave been able to identify two other membrane anchored serineproteases (mCAP2 and mCAP3) that require an intact catalytictriad to activate ENaC. This cell line also expresses high levelsof various serine protease inhibitors (Vuagniaux G and RossierB; unpublished observations). This suggests the existence ofa complex cascade involving at least three distinct serine proteasesthat can act catalytically and/or by protein-protein interactionwith serine protease inhibitors. This may represent a novelextracellular signaling cascade that controls ENaC activityin the extracellular environment. The molecular mechanisms involvedare unknown and could involve a direct cleavage of ENaC (the subunit has been proposed in reference (14) or by an indirectmechanism involving associated protein of the extracellularenvironment.
Role of N-Glycosylation
The present data suggest that xCAP-1 undergoes the first stepof core glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum but thatfull glycosylation is not required for targeting to the plasmamembrane. We can clearly demonstrate that the nonglycosylatedN288Q mutant is expressed at the cell surface as well as thewild type by both immunofluorescence and binding assays. N288Qremains able to fully activate ENaC. Therefore, N-glycosylationof xCAP-1 is not necessary for its trafficking to the plasmamembrane or for its biologic activity.
Importance of the GPI Anchor
Many extracellular biologic processes are mediated by proteases.Some of these proteases are secreted, and others are bound tothe cell surface through transmembrane domains or GPI-anchoring.Examples of GPI-anchored proteases include the membrane type4 matrix metalloproteinase (15), the carboxypeptidase M (16),or the -secretase activity (17). xCAP-1 possesses an N-terminalsignal peptide and a C-terminal hydrophobic tail, a typicalstructure of GPI-anchored proteins. Analysis of its primarysequence predicts that the C-terminal hydrophobic tail is cleavedbetween residues N304 and G305 and that the novel C-terminaltail is then linked to GPI moiety by a transamidase. Insertionof a STOP codon at position 305 will impair membrane-anchorageof xCAP-1 and generate a secreted protein. Immunofluorescenceexperiments and binding assay results indicate that WT xCAP-1is a cell surface-attached protein, but the G305Stop mutantwas not detected at the cell surface and does not appear toaccumulate in some intracellular vesicles, indicating that itis effectively secreted. The C-terminal hydrophobic tail ofxCAP-1 is then necessary for its membrane-anchoring, stronglysuggesting that WT xCAP-1 should be a GPI-anchored protein.In the present study, we have not been able to directly measureserine protease activity of the GPI-anchored, membrane-boundform of the protein. It has recently been biochemically demonstratedthat prostasin, the human ortholog of CAP-1, is a GPI-anchoredactive serine protease (18). It was also shown that both thesecreted and the GPI-anchored form of prostasin were able tocovalently bind a 82-kD prostasin-binding protein, an interactionthat could be inhibited by aprotinin or other serine proteasesinhibitors (18). The function of prostasin in the prostate isnot yet defined, but a complex extracellular signaling cascadeinvolving protein-protein interaction and catalytic activitycould operate in the prostate. This is consistent with the dataand the working hypothesis presented here for the kidney.
Physiologic and Pathophysiologic Relevance
In the kidney, the control of sodium balance by the fine regulationof the amiloride-sensitive electrogenic sodium reabsorptionmediated by ENaC in the distal nephron is critical for the controlof blood volume and BP (1). Gain-of-function mutations in ENaC(19) or in the mineralocorticoid receptor (with a constitutiveactivation of the aldosterone-dependent signaling cascade) (20)lead to severe forms of salt-sensitive hypertension. Loss-of-functionmutation in 11 ß-HSD-2, the enzyme protecting MR fromillicit occupation by cortisol, is also associated with earlyand severe hypertension in newborn babies (21). From these observations,one can deduce that any gain (or loss) of function mutationsin genes leading to the activation (or repression) of the amiloride-sensitiveelectrogenic sodium tranport can contribute to a hypertensivephenotype. Genes involved in this novel extracellular signalingcascade are obviously candidate genes for such a role.
In the lung and airways, ENaC plays a critical role in controllinglung fluid clearance at birth (22) and air surface liquid, therebydetermining the rate of mucociliary clearance (23). Amiloridehas been tested as an inhalation therapy in cystic fibrosisto decrease sodium reabsorption and increase mucociliary clearance(24). It has recently been shown that bicunin, a serine proteaseinhibitor (Kunitz type), can block up to 60% of the electrogenicamiloride-sensitive sodium transport in primary cultures ofhuman airway epithelia (25). CAP-1 is highly expressed in humanairways and thus a potential drug target to increase mucociliaryclearance in cystic fibrosis or related pathophysiologic disturbances.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National ScienceFoundation (No 3143384.95 to BCR). VV was the recipientof a long-term European Molecular Biology Organization fellowship.We thank Jean-Daniel Horisberger, Edithe Hummler, GrégoireVuagniaux, Käthi Geering, Dmitri Firsov, and Laurent Schildfor their helpful comments and criticisms.
Footnotes
Dr. Vallets current affiliation: Division dhématologie,CHUV, 1011-Lausanne, Switzerland
Udenfriend S, Kodukula K: How glycosyl-phospatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein are made. Annu Rev Biochem 64: 563591, 1995[Medline]
Chraibi A, Vallet V, Firsov D, Hess SK, Horisberger JD: Protease modulation of the activity of the epithelial sodium channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Gen Physiol 111: 127138, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Puoti A, May A, Canessa CM, Horisberger JD, Schild L, Rossier BC: The highly selective low-conductance epithelial Na channel of Xenopus laevis A6 kidney cells. Am J Physiol 269: C188C197, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Canessa CM, Schild L, Buell G, Thorens B, Gautschi I, Horisberger J-D, Rossier BC: Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature 367: 463467, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
Firsov D, Grunder S, Schild L, Rossier BC: Quantitation of cell-surface expressed epithelial sodium channel: A novel approach to determine the channel open probability in a whole cell. Nova Acta Leopold 75: 1322, 1997
Geering K, Theulaz I, Verrey F, Hauptle MT, Rossier BC: A role for the beta-subunit in the expression of functional Na+-K+- ATPase in Xenopus oocytes. Am J Physiol 257: C851C858, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Perona JJ, Craik CS: Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases. Protein Sci 4: 337360, 1995[Abstract]
Trexler M, Banyai L, Patthy L: A human protein containing multiple types of protease-inhibitory modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 37053709, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vuagniaux G, Vallet V, Jaeger NF, Pfister C, Bens M, Farman N, Courtois-Coutry N, Vandewalle A, Rossier BC, Hummler E: Activation of the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel by the serine protease mCAP1 expressed in a mouse cortical collecting duct cell line. J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 828834, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Adachi M, Kitamura K, Miyoshi T, Narikiyo T, Iwashita K, Shiraishi N, Nonoguchi H, Tomita K: Activation of epithelial sodium channels by prostasin in Xenopus oocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 11141121, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Masilamani S, Kim GH, Mitchell C, Wade JB, Knepper MA: Aldosterone-mediated regulation of ENaC alpha, beta, and gamma subunit proteins in rat kidney. J Clin Invest 104: R19R23, 1999[Medline]
Itoh Y, Kajita M, Kinoh H, Mori H, Okada A, Seiki M: Membrane type 4 matrix metalloproteinase (MT4-MMP, MMP17) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteinase. J Biol Chem 274: 3426034266, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
McGwire GB, Becker RP, Skidgel RA: Carboxypeptidase M, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein, is localized on both the apical and basolateral domains of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem 274: 3163231640, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Komano H, Seeger M, Gandy S, Wang GT, Krafft GA, Fuller RS: Involvement of cell surface glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked aspartyl proteases in -secretase-type cleavage and ectodomain solubilization of human Alzheimer ß-amyloid precursor protein in yeast. J Biol Chem 273: 3164831651, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chen LM, Skinner ML, Kauffman SW, Chao J, Chao L, Thaler CD, Chai KX: Prostasin is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored active serine protease. J Biol Chem 276: 2143421442, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Shimkets RA, Warnock DG, Bositis CM, Nelson-Williams C, Hansson JH, Schambelan M, Gill JR, Jr., Ulick S, Milora RV, Findling JW, Canessa CM, Rossier BC, Lifton RP: Liddles syndrome: Heritable human hypertension caused by mutations in the beta subunit of the epithelial sodium channel. Cell 79: 407414, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
Geller DS, Farhi A, Pinkerton N, Fradley M, Moritz M, Spitzer A, Meinke G, Tsai FTF, Sigler PB, Lifton RP: Activating mineralocorticoid receptor mutation in hypertension exacerbated by pregnancy. Science 289: 119123, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Krosowski ZS, Stewart PM, Obeyesekere VR, Li K, Ferrari P: Mutations in the 11 beta HSD-2 en zyme associated with hypertension and possibly stillbirth. Clin Exp Hypert 19: 519529, 1997
Hummler E, Barker P, Gatzy J, Beermann F, Verdumo C, Schmidt A, Boucher R, Rossier BC: Early death due to defective neonatal lung liquid clearance in alpha- ENaC-deficient mice. Nat Genet 12: 325328, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
Boucher RC: Human airway ion transport. Am J Resp Crit Care 150: 271281, 1994[Medline]
Knowles MR, Church NL, Waltner WE, Yankaskas JR, Gilligan P, King M, Edwards LJ, Helms RW, Boucher RC: A pilot study of aerosolized amiloride for the treatment of lung disease in cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 322: 11891194, 1990[Abstract]
Bridges RJ, Newton BB, Pilewski JM, Devor DC, Poll CT, Hall RL: Na+ transport in normal and CF human bronchial epithelial cells is inhibited by BAY 399437. Am J Physiol 281: L16L23, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication October 17, 2001.
Accepted for publication November 15, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
A. Garcia-Caballero, Y. Dang, H. He, and M. J. Stutts ENaC Proteolytic Regulation by Channel-activating Protease 2
J. Gen. Physiol.,
October 27, 2008;
132(5):
521 - 535.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
V. Nesterov, A. Dahlmann, M. Bertog, and C. Korbmacher Trypsin can activate the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in microdissected mouse distal nephron
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2008;
295(4):
F1052 - F1062.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Diakov, K. Bera, M. Mokrushina, B. Krueger, and C. Korbmacher Cleavage in the {gamma}-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) plays an important role in the proteolytic activation of near-silent channels
J. Physiol.,
October 1, 2008;
586(19):
4587 - 4608.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. L. Brown, Z. Liao, and M. B. Goodman MEC-2 and MEC-6 in the Caenorhabditis elegans Sensory Mechanotransduction Complex: Auxiliary Subunits that Enable Channel Activity
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 1, 2008;
131(6):
605 - 616.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
N. Picard, D. Eladari, S. El Moghrabi, C. Planes, S. Bourgeois, P. Houillier, Q. Wang, M. Burnier, G. Deschenes, M. A. Knepper, et al. Defective ENaC Processing and Function in Tissue Kallikrein-deficient Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 22, 2008;
283(8):
4602 - 4611.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
V. Bize and J.-D. Horisberger Sodium self-inhibition of human epithelial sodium channel: selectivity and affinity of the extracellular sodium sensing site
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2007;
293(4):
F1137 - F1146.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Bengrine, J. Li, L. L. Hamm, and M. S. Awayda Indirect Activation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Trypsin
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 14, 2007;
282(37):
26884 - 26896.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
R. A. Falin and C. U. Cotton Acute Downregulation of ENaC by EGF Involves the PY Motif and Putative ERK Phosphorylation Site
J. Gen. Physiol.,
August 27, 2007;
130(3):
313 - 328.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. B. Bruns, M. D. Carattino, S. Sheng, A. B. Maarouf, O. A. Weisz, J. M. Pilewski, R. P. Hughey, and T. R. Kleyman Epithelial Na+ Channels Are Fully Activated by Furin- and Prostasin-dependent Release of an Inhibitory Peptide from the {gamma}-Subunit
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 2, 2007;
282(9):
6153 - 6160.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
G. M. Verghese, M. F. Gutknecht, and G. H. Caughey Prostasin regulates epithelial monolayer function: cell-specific Gpld1-mediated secretion and functional role for GPI anchor
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2006;
291(6):
C1258 - C1270.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
H.-Y. Lin, H. Zhang, Q. Yang, H.-X. Wang, H.-M. Wang, K. X. Chai, L.-M. Chen, and C. Zhu Expression of Prostasin and Protease Nexin-1 in Rhesus Monkey (Macaca mulatta) Endometrium and Placenta During Early Pregnancy
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
October 1, 2006;
54(10):
1139 - 1147.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
V. Bhalla, R. Soundararajan, A. C. Pao, H. Li, and D. Pearce Disinhibitory pathways for control of sodium transport: regulation of ENaC by SGK1 and GILZ
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2006;
291(4):
F714 - F721.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
L.-M. Chen, C. Wang, M. Chen, M. R. Marcello, J. Chao, L. Chao, and K. X. Chai Prostasin attenuates inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in lipopolysaccharide-induced urinary bladder inflammation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2006;
291(3):
F567 - F577.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. Nielsen, T.-H. Kwon, J. Frokiaer, M. A. Knepper, and S. Nielsen Lithium-induced NDI in rats is associated with loss of {alpha}-ENaC regulation by aldosterone in CCD
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
May 1, 2006;
290(5):
F1222 - F1233.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
D. Andreasen, G. Vuagniaux, N. Fowler-Jaeger, E. Hummler, and B. C. Rossier Activation of Epithelial Sodium Channels by Mouse Channel Activating Proteases (mCAP) Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes Requires Catalytic Activity of mCAP3 and mCAP2 but not mCAP1
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
April 1, 2006;
17(4):
968 - 976.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M. Vukicevic, G. Weder, A. Boillat, A. Boesch, and S. Kellenberger Trypsin Cleaves Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a in a Domain That Is Critical for Channel Gating
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 13, 2006;
281(2):
714 - 722.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Adebamiro, Y. Cheng, J. P. Johnson, and R. J. Bridges Endogenous Protease Activation of ENaC: Effect of Serine Protease Inhibition on ENaC Single Channel Properties
J. Gen. Physiol.,
September 26, 2005;
126(4):
339 - 352.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. Planes, C. Leyvraz, T. Uchida, M. A. Angelova, G. Vuagniaux, E. Hummler, M. Matthay, C. Clerici, and B. Rossier In vitro and in vivo regulation of transepithelial lung alveolar sodium transport by serine proteases
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
June 1, 2005;
288(6):
L1099 - L1109.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
Z. Tong, B. Illek, V. J. Bhagwandin, G. M. Verghese, and G. H. Caughey Prostasin, a membrane-anchored serine peptidase, regulates sodium currents in JME/CF15 cells, a cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cell line
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
November 1, 2004;
287(5):
L928 - L935.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
B. C. Rossier The Epithelial Sodium Channel: Activation by Membrane-Bound Serine Proteases
Proceedings of the ATS,
January 1, 2004;
1(1):
4 - 9.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
R. P. Hughey, G. M. Mueller, J. B. Bruns, C. L. Kinlough, P. A. Poland, K. L. Harkleroad, M. D. Carattino, and T. R. Kleyman Maturation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel Involves Proteolytic Processing of the {alpha}- and {gamma}-Subunits
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 2003;
278(39):
37073 - 37082.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
R. E. Booth and J. D. Stockand Targeted degradation of ENaC in response to PKC activation of the ERK1/2 cascade
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
May 1, 2003;
284(5):
F938 - F947.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. Wang, J. Chao, and L. Chao Adenovirus-mediated human prostasin gene delivery is linked to increased aldosterone production and hypertension in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
April 1, 2003;
284(4):
R1031 - R1036.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A.-A. Konstas and C. Korbmacher The gamma -subunit of ENaC is more important for channel surface expression than the beta -subunit
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2003;
284(2):
C447 - C456.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
V. J. Bhagwandin, L. W.-T. Hau, J. Mallen-St. Clair, P. J. Wolters, and G. H. Caughey Structure and Activity of Human Pancreasin, a Novel Tryptic Serine Peptidase Expressed Primarily by the Pancreas
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 24, 2003;
278(5):
3363 - 3371.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
K. Iwashita, K. Kitamura, T. Narikiyo, M. Adachi, N. Shiraishi, T. Miyoshi, J. Nagano, D. G. Tuyen, H. Nonoguchi, and K. Tomita Inhibition of Prostasin Secretion by Serine Protease Inhibitors in the Kidney
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2003;
14(1):
11 - 16.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]