Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verhulst, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Broe, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verhulst, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Broe, M. E.
J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1210-1218, 2002
© 2002 American Society of Nephrology

Osteopontin Synthesis and Localization along the Human Nephron

Anja Verhulst, Veerle P. Persy, An R. Van Rompay, Walter A. Verstrepen, Mark F. Helbert and Marc E. De Broe

Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of Antwerp, Belgium.

Correspondence to Dr. Marc E. De Broe, Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of Antwerp, p/a University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem/Antwerpen, Belgium. Phone: +32-3-821-3421; Fax: +32-3-829-0100; E-mail: debroe{at}uia.ua.ac.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. In normal human and rat kidneys, osteopontin (OPN) is present at the apical surface of cells in the distal nephron. After ischemic or toxic renal damage in rats, OPN is upregulated in distal tubular cells (DTC) and expressed de novo in perinuclear vesicles in proximal tubular cells (PTC). In the first phase of this study, OPN localization in ischemic human biopsies was compared with that in ischemic rat kidneys. In the second phase, cultures of PTC and DTC were used to investigate human renal OPN synthesis, secretion, and localization. OPN localization in human biopsies after renal ischemia was comparable to that in ischemic rat kidneys. Microscopic and flow cytometric detection of immunofluorescent OPN staining in tubular cell cultures demonstrated strong plasma membrane localization in DTC, whereas mainly perinuclear intracellular expression was observed in PTC. Northern blotting and reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated production of a single OPN mRNA in PTC and DTC. Detection of OPN by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay demonstrated that PTC and DTC synthesized and secreted the same three molecular mass OPN forms, in comparable amounts. Finally, confocal microscopy demonstrated different staining patterns for endocytotic/lysosomal vesicles and perinuclear OPN; however, perinuclear OPN exhibited colocalization with the Golgi apparatus. In conclusion, human renal OPN localization in cell cultures demonstrated differences between PTC and DTC comparable to those observed after renal ischemia in vivo. Therefore, these cell cultures represented an excellent model for the study of human OPN synthesis, secretion, and localization in PTC versus DTC. It is reported for the first time that intracellular OPN is located in the Golgi apparatus of both PTC and DTC and that PTC and DTC are able to produce and secrete the same OPN isoforms, in comparable amounts.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Osteopontin (OPN) is a glycosylated phosphoprotein that was originally isolated from bone (1) but is expressed in a variety of tissues, including renal tubular epithelium (24). In normal human and rat kidneys, OPN expression is mainly confined to the apical cell surface of a few cells in Henle’s loop and in the more distal parts of the nephron (2,3,5,6). Constitutive OPN expression is thought to play a role in the process of nephrolithiasis (79).

In several experimental models of renal disease, highly upregulated OPN levels have been reported (5,6,1016). The precise role of OPN in renal pathophysiologic processes remains unclear, however. A protective role for OPN was deduced from its ability to reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase levels (17,18). Through its interactions with several integrins, OPN has been reported to promote cell attachment and migration (19,20) and to decrease tubular cast formation (21). The stimulation of transforming growth factor-{beta} activity, collagen deposition (22), and macrophage attraction (22,23) and the reduction of apoptotic cell death (22) suggest a role for OPN in renal fibrosis.

Upregulated OPN expression after acute renal injury in rats exhibits a specific pattern (5,6). Distal tubular cells (DTC) demonstrate pronounced OPN expression at their apical cell surfaces, whereas only a few DTC exhibit perinuclear staining. In proximal tubular cells (PTC), however, OPN is predominantly observed in perinuclear vesicles and apical cell surface expression is restricted to regenerating PTC (6). The same pattern of OPN expression, although less prominent, was observed by Hudkins et al. (2) in normal human kidney at sites of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis.

An understanding of renal OPN function requires elucidation of this peculiar OPN expression pattern. OPN synthesis, secretion, and localization in primary cell cultures of human PTC and DTC were examined, to obtain better insight into the cellular OPN expression pattern and to learn more regarding human OPN expression in general.

A cell culture system for mixed and pure human PTC and DTC was previously developed in our laboratory (2426). Flow cytometric immunodissection of PTC and DTC, on the basis of their expression of leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), respectively, has been described as an accurate method to obtain pure primary cultures of human PTC and DTC (2426). In the mixed cultures, PTC or DTC origins can be determined by means of LAP or EMA expression, respectively (2426).

OPN localization was investigated by microscopic and flow cytometric analyses after immunofluorescent staining of cell cultures for OPN, LAP, and EMA. OPN transcription was studied by Northern blotting and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and OPN synthesis and secretion were investigated by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) of both cell culture conditioned media and cell lysates. Intracellular OPN localization was investigated by means of confocal microscopy, using antibodies raised against OPN and specific organelle markers.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Primary Antibodies
Mouse anti-human LAP monoclonal antibody (clone AD1) was previously characterized in our laboratory (27). Rat anti-human EMA monoclonal antibody (clone ICR.2) was purchased from Seralab (Leicestershire, UK). For detection of OPN, we used the polyclonal antibodies OP189 (host, goat; provided by C. M. Giachelli, University of Washington) and LF123 (host, rabbit; provided by Dr. L. W. Fisher, National Institutes of Health). Specific lysosomal staining was performed with a polyclonal anti-cathepsin D antibody (Biogenesis, Bournemouth, UK). The Golgi apparatus was labeled with a monoclonal antibody against Golgi 58K protein, which is a specific Golgi marker (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO).

OPN Detection in Human Biopsies
Ischemic human biopsies obtained from transplantation kidneys before implantation were fixed in methacarn fixative for 4 h and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were blocked with normal horse serum, incubated overnight with OP189, washed, and subsequently incubated for 30 min with biotinylated horse anti-goat Ig antibody (Vector, Burlingame, CA). After washing and incubation with avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Vector), OPN immunoreactivity was detected with diaminobenzidine. Sections were counterstained with periodic acid-Schiff reagent.

Isolation, Purification, and Culture of Human PTC and DTC
PTC and DTC were isolated as described previously (24,25). Briefly, normal human kidney tissue, which became available through nephrectomies performed for oncologic indications, was collected and processed in a sterile manner. Macroscopically normal tissue was decapsulated. The cortex and outer stripe of the outer medulla were dissected, cut into pieces of approximately 1 mm3, and digested in collagenase D solution (Roche, Ottweiler, Germany) supplemented with DNase (Sigma). The suspension was shaken vigorously for 2 h at 37°C and sieved through a 120-µm sieve. The resulting single-cell suspension was loaded on top of a discontinuous Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) gradient with densities of 1.04 and 1.07 g/ml. After centrifugation, cells from the intersection were carefully aspirated, washed, and either brought into culture as a mixed population or subjected to further purification via flow cytometric sorting. For sorting, cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with anti-human LAP and EMA monoclonal antibodies; LAP and EMA were previously identified in our laboratory as markers of proximal and distal tubules, respectively (24). Phycoerythrin-labeled rabbit F(ab')2 anti-mouse Ig (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and FITC-labeled goat F(ab')2 anti-rat Ig (SBA, Birmingham, AL) secondary antibodies were then added to the cell suspensions. Labeled cells were sorted into distinct PTC (LAP+/EMA-) and DTC (LAP-/EMA+) populations by using a FACStar Plus flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA). For assessment of sorting purity, >1000 cells from each population were reanalyzed by flow cytometry.

Mixed and pure cultures of PTC and DTC were grown on six-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, UK) or tissue culture chamber slides (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) for 5 d, in {alpha}-minimal essential medium (Life Technologies) modified as described by Gibson d’Ambrosio et al. (28) and supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Fetal calf serum-containing medium was replaced with serum-free, Gibson d’Ambrosio-modified {alpha}-minimal essential medium 24 h before experiments. Cultures were in a proliferating state when experiments were performed.

Recombinant Human OPN
Histidine6-tagged, recombinant human OPN was produced after induction of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli M15 cells containing an expression vector with the coding sequence for human OPN (kindly provided by Dr. M. Hook, ECM Research Center, University of Texas). OPN was purified on a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Immunofluorescent Staining of OPN, LAP, and EMA
Human tubular cell cultures were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, washed, and blocked with normal donkey serum. Cells were incubated overnight with primary antibody combinations (OP189/anti-EMA, OP189/anti-LAP, or anti-LAP/anti-EMA) and were then incubated for 2 h with FITC- or Cy3-labeled donkey anti-goat, -rat, or -mouse Ig secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). OP189 was replaced with preimmune serum as a negative control. For verification of OPN signal specificity, OP189 was preadsorbed with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid immobilized human recombinant OPN. Both replacement and preadsorption of OP189 resulted in the loss of OPN signals.

Flow Cytometric Analysis
LAP, EMA, and OPN cell surface expression in human tubular cell cultures was investigated by LAP/EMA/OPN triple-staining of living, unfixed, nonpermeable cells. In these experiments, only extracellular OPN could be detected. Mixed human tubular cell cultures were trypsinized (0.125% trypsin, 0.04% ethylenediaminetetraacetate), and the resulting cell suspension was incubated for 30 min at 4°C with a combination of OP189, anti-EMA, and biotinylated anti-LAP antibodies. After washing, phycoerythrin-labeled donkey anti-goat Ig (Jackson Immunoresearch), FITC-labeled donkey anti-rat Ig (Jackson Immunoresearch), and Peridinin chlorophyll protein-conjugated streptavidin (Becton Dickinson) were added to the cell suspension. Analyses were performed by using a FACStar Plus flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) equipped with LYSIS software. Double-staining (LAP/EMA, LAP/OPN, and EMA/OPN), single-staining (LAP, EMA, and OPN), and a negative control sample of unstained cells were assessed for regulation of fluorescence compensation settings. OPN signal specificity was confirmed as described above for immunofluorescent OPN staining.

Northern Blot Analysis
RNA was extracted from mixed and pure PTC and DTC cultures and from normal human kidney tissue by using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies), according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Extracted RNA (2.5 µg) was subjected to electrophoresis in denaturing 1.2% agarose gels and was transferred to Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by alkaline vacuum blotting. Membranes were then hybridized (in 50% formamide, 5x SSC) with a 32P-labeled DNA probe generated by random-primed DNA labeling (Megaprime DNA labeling kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) of the cDNA insert from the human OPN expression vector. Posthybridization high-stringency washes were performed at 65°C. Membranes were then exposed to autoradiographic film for 8 h. RNA extracted from normal human kidneys was used as a positive control sample.

RT-PCR, Cloning, and Sequencing of OPN mRNA
RNA from PTC and DTC was extracted with a SV total RNA isolation kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA. OPN primers (CCATGAGAATTGCAGTGATTTGCTTTTGC and CGTTAATTGACCTCAGAAGATGCACTATC) were used for PCR amplification of the OPN coding sequence. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis, isolated from the agarose gel, and cloned into a pGEM-T vector (Promega). Finally, OPN inserts from PTC and DTC were sequenced by Eurogentec (Ivoz-Ramet, Belgium) with a T7/T3 primer set and compared.

Western Blotting
Serum-free conditioned media were collected 24 h after addition to human tubular cell cultures. Cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed for 20 min at 4°C in RIPA buffer (0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) supplemented with a mixture of protease inhibitors (Roche). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation (12,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C). Six microliters of conditioned medium or cell lysate were subjected to electrophoresis on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins from the gel were electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were incubated overnight in 5% nonfat dry milk (blotting-grade blocker; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and were then incubated with LF123 antiserum for 1 h. After Tris-buffered saline/Tween washes, membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit Ig antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The immune complexes were detected by using a chemiluminescence kit (ECL Western blotting kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Human recombinant and urinary OPN were used as positive control samples. OPN signal specificity was confirmed as described above.

ELISA
OPN concentrations were determined with an ELISA procedure. Serum-free conditioned media or cell lysates (see above) were coated overnight onto 96-well plates. Nonspecific protein binding was blocked with a 2-h incubation with 1% bovine serum albumin. OPN was detected with LF123 and a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit Ig antibody (Dako). After incubation with avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Dako), peroxidase substrate (TMB substrate kit; Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stopped with 2 N H2SO4 and the color intensity was quantified at 450 nm. Using human recombinant OPN as a standard, OPN concentrations were estimated and expressed as milligrams of OPN per gram of protein. OPN signal specificity was confirmed as described above.

Intracellular OPN Localization
Endocytotic Vesicles.
Living human tubular cell cultures were incubated with 7.5 µg/ml FITC-labeled dextran (Mr 10,000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 min at 37°C and were then washed 10 times, for removal of noninternalized dextran. Cells were then fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min.

Lysosomes.
Mixed cultures of human PTC and DTC were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, incubated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and blocked with normal donkey serum. Cells were incubated overnight with anti-cathepsin D antibody and were then incubated for 2 h with a Cy3-labeled anti-rabbit Ig secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch).

Golgi Apparatus.
Mixed cultures of human PTC and DTC were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, incubated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and blocked with normal donkey serum. Cells were incubated overnight with primary antibodies (OP189 and anti-58K protein) and were then incubated for 2 h with Cy3- and FITC-labeled donkey anti-goat Ig and donkey anti-mouse Ig secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch).

Fluorescence signals were analyzed by using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 410; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Image processing was performed by using Imaris 2.7 image-reconstruction software (Bitplane AG) on a Silicon Graphics (Mountain View, CA) Indigo workstation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OPN Expression in Ischemic Human Biopsies
As presented in Figure 1, pronounced OPN immunoreactivity was present at the apical cell surface of distal tubules. Some DTC also exhibited OPN signals in perinuclear vesicles. In PTC, however, OPN immunostaining was restricted to perinuclear vesicles in slightly damaged tubules. All biopsies were obtained from the cortex; therefore, the proximal tubules are S1/S2 segments.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Osteopontin (OPN) immunostaining of human kidney tissue from implantation biopsies, using a peroxidase-diaminobenzidine procedure. Tissue sections were counterstained with periodic acid-Schiff reagent. Distal tubular cells (DTC) exhibited pronounced apical OPN immunostaining (black arrows); however, some DTC also exhibited OPN signals in perinuclear vesicles (white arrow). Slightly damaged proximal tubular cells (PTC) demonstrated perinuclear OPN staining (arrowheads). Magnification, x400.

 
Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Flow cytometric immunodissection resulted in 97% pure cultures of PTC and DTC. Both mixed and pure tubular cells grew to >90% confluence within approximately 6 d. As noted earlier by Helbert et al. (25), cultures retained exclusive LAP or EMA expression during that period. OPN expression was therefore investigated in primary mixed and pure cultures of PTC and DTC. Because flow cytometric immunodissection resulted into low cell yields, mixed cultures were used when possible.

Localization of OPN Expression in Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Immunocytochemical analyses clearly demonstrated different OPN expression patterns in DTC and PTC (Figures 2 and 3). In both mixed (Figure 2, A, A', B, and B') and pure (Figure 2, C and D) tubular cultures, virtually all DTC (EMA-positive) demonstrated strong OPN immunoreactivity (Figure 2, A and A'), whereas PTC (LAP-positive) were weakly OPN positive (Figure 2, B and B'). OPN staining of EMA-positive DTC was intense and covered the entire cell surface (consistent with plasma membrane expression) (Figure 2C). Much less plasma membrane staining was observed in LAP-positive PTC (Figure 2D), where OPN staining appeared mainly intracellular and perinuclear. This perinuclear intracellular OPN staining in PTC was clearly demonstrated when cells were permeabilized before immunostaining and were observed with confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 3). Intracellular perinuclear OPN staining in DTC could be observed only when plasma membrane OPN staining was less prominent (Figure 3).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Immunofluorescent epithelial membrane antigen (EMA)/OPN and leucine aminopeptidase (LAP)/OPN staining of mixed and pure tubular cell cultures, as described in Materials and Methods. (A and A') Immunofluorescent EMA/OPN staining of a mixed PTC/DTC culture. EMA-positive DTC (A) demonstrated intense OPN immunoreactivity (A'). Magnification, x140. (B and B') Immunofluorescent LAP/OPN staining of a mixed PTC/DTC culture. LAP-positive PTC (B) demonstrated no or weak OPN expression (B'), whereas surrounding LAP-negative, EMA-positive DTC demonstrated strong OPN expression. Magnification, x140. (C) Pure DTC culture immunofluorescently stained for OPN. As in A, DTC demonstrated intense OPN staining. Magnification, x250. (D) Immunofluorescent LAP/OPN staining of a pure PTC culture. OPN staining was clearly less strong, compared with DTC. Magnification, x200.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Confocal microscopic image of a mixed PTC/DTC culture stained immunofluorescently for OPN. PTC demonstrated clearly visible perinuclear intracellular staining (arrows). DTC demonstrated plasma membrane OPN expression (asterisks). Intracellular OPN was visible in DTC (arrowhead) only when plasma membrane expression was not too intense. Magnification, x250.

 
Plasma Membrane OPN Expression in Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Flow cytometric detection of OPN on living, unfixed, nonpermeable cells confirmed the presence of OPN at the extracellular cell surface (plasma membrane OPN expression). To obtain quantitative data on this plasma membrane expression, we performed a flow cytometric analysis with OPN/LAP/EMA triple-staining. EMA- and LAP-positive populations were defined (Figure 4, A and B). Plasma membrane OPN expression was mainly concentrated on EMA-positive DTC (Figure 4C), with much less expression on LAP-positive PTC (Figure 4D). LAP/EMA/OPN staining of three different kidney specimens indicated that 93.3 ± 5.6% of DTC were OPN-positive, whereas only 17.5 ± 15.5% of PTC were OPN-positive; OPN expression on PTC varied considerably among different kidney specimens, whereas OPN expression on DTC was rather constant. Furthermore, it could be demonstrated that the OPN fluorescence signal was much stronger in EMA-positive cells. Indeed, the OPN signal of DTC was clearly shifted to the right, compared with the negative control signal (Figure 4C), whereas the OPN fluorescence of PTC was difficult to distinguish from the negative control signal (Figure 4D). Consequently, the results of microscopic and flow cytometric OPN analyses were in close agreement with each other.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Fluorescent LAP/EMA/OPN staining of a mixed tubular cell culture, as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Dot plot diagram showing EMA- and LAP-positive cells. (B) Negative control sample of cells not stained for LAP or EMA. (C) OPN fluorescence histogram of EMA-positive cells (black), compared with the negative control sample of EMA-positive cells not stained for OPN (OP189 replaced by normal goat serum) (gray). (D) OPN fluorescence histogram of LAP-positive cells (black), compared with the negative control sample of LAP-positive cells not stained for OPN (OP189 replaced by normal goat serum) (gray).

 
Detection of OPN mRNA in Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Northern blot analysis revealed that tubular cell cultures produced a single OPN mRNA of 1.6 kb (Figure 5). Comparable amounts of this transcript were present in PTC, DTC, and mixed tubular cell cultures. The size of the OPN mRNA produced in human tubular cell cultures agreed with the size of the OPN mRNA in human kidney tissue (data not shown) and with the reported size of the complete OPN cDNA sequence (GenBank accession number AF052124). RT-PCR resulted in one product, with the expected size of 960 bp, in PTC and DTC (data not shown). Sequence analysis revealed that the coding sequences for OPN were identical in PTC and DTC. Therefore, no alternative splicing occurred in PTC or DTC.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Northern blot analysis of OPN mRNA in mixed and separated cultures of PTC and DTC, as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Assay demonstrating a single OPN mRNA of 1.6 kb in PTC and DTC. (B) Semiquantitative control assay with 28S and 18S rRNA.

 
OPN Synthesis and Secretion in Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Western blot analysis demonstrated full-length human recombinant OPN (produced as described in Materials and Methods) as a 58-kD protein (Figure 6). Analysis of urinary OPN revealed 66- and 72-kD protein bands (Figure 6). In conditioned media and cell lysates of mixed PTC and DTC, OPN forms of 66 and 72 kD (equivalent to urinary OPN) and a 58-kD form (equivalent to human recombinant OPN) were identified (Figure 6). Some lower-molecular mass forms were also detected in cell lysates and conditioned media, probably because of protein degradation. No differences were observed between PTC and DTC or between cell lysates and conditioned media. ELISA allowed quantification of OPN production and secretion. Comparable results were observed for PTC and DTC, which produced 7.3 and 6.4 mg OPN/g protein, respectively, of which 7.1 and 5.9 mg OPN/g protein were secreted into the medium. Therefore, no important quantitative differences in the levels of OPN production were observed between PTC and DTC.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Western blot analysis of recombinant and urinary OPN in comparison with OPN detected in cell lysates and conditioned media from mixed and pure PTC/DTC cultures. In conditioned media and cell lysates of PTC and DTC, the same three OPN forms were detected. The 58-kD form is equivalent to recombinant OPN. The 66- and 72-kD forms are equivalent to urinary OPN.

 
Subcellular OPN Localization in Human Tubular Cell Cultures
Uptake of FITC-labeled dextran resulted in a punctuate fluorescence pattern throughout the cell cytoplasm (Figure 7). Lysosomal staining was also scattered throughout the cytoplasm (Figure 8). Expression of the Golgi apparatus marker 58K protein was confined to the perinuclear zone (Figure 9A), however, suggesting colocalization with the perinuclear intracellular OPN expression. Double-immunostaining for OPN and the Golgi marker 58K protein confirmed colocalization (Figure 9).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Confocal microscopic analysis of FITC-dextran endocytosis in a mixed PTC/DTC culture. Uptake of FITC-labeled dextran resulted in a punctuate fluorescence pattern throughout the cell cytoplasm (asterisk, cell nucleus). Magnification, x300.

 


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Confocal microscopic analysis of a mixed PTC/DTC culture fluorescently stained for the lysosomal protein cathepsin D. Lysosomes were scattered throughout the cytoplasm (asterisks, cell nuclei). Magnification, x300.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 9. Confocal microscopic analysis of a mixed PTC/DTC culture fluorescently stained for the Golgi marker 58K protein and OPN. The Golgi marker (A, arrows) and intracellular OPN (B, arrows) exhibited comparable perinuclear localization. The combined image demonstrates the colocalization of OPN and 58K protein as a yellow signal (C, arrows). Magnification, x200.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this report, an extensive study of human renal OPN synthesis, secretion, and localization in PTC versus DTC is presented. PTC and DTC were demonstrated to produce and secrete the same OPN forms, in comparable amounts. In addition, both PTC and DTC demonstrated OPN localization in the Golgi apparatus, and DTC exhibited pronounced OPN localization at the plasma membrane.

In rats, OPN upregulation is observed in several models of acute or chronic renal failure (5,6,10,11,13,16), with OPN displaying a peculiar expression pattern. DTC demonstrate pronounced OPN expression at the apical cell surface, and only a few DTC exhibit perinuclear staining (5,6). In PTC, however, OPN is observed predominantly in perinuclear vesicles, and apical cell surface expression is limited to regenerating PTC (6). Little is currently known regarding OPN upregulation in the human kidney. Limited OPN upregulation has been observed at sites of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in human kidney sections (2). In cell culture, upregulation of OPN mRNA after hypoxia and reoxygenation has been observed (29). Therefore, we performed OPN staining in human renal tissue from transplantation kidneys. In this tissue, which had been ischemic (variable degrees of warm and cold ischemia), prominent OPN immunostaining was detected at the apical cell surface of DTC and perinuclear OPN staining was observed in slightly damaged PTC. These findings are in good agreement with the OPN expression pattern observed in rat kidneys after acute toxic/ischemic renal damage (5,6). Because all biopsies were obtained from the cortex, it is not possible to comment on OPN localization in the S3 segments of proximal tubules. However, clear perinuclear OPN localization in both S1/S2 and S3 segments in rats has been reported (5,6), which strongly suggests that perinuclear OPN localization is present in all proximal tubular segments in human kidneys as well.

An understanding of the peculiar OPN expression pattern is required for accurate comprehension of renal OPN function. To obtain better insights into the synthesis, secretion, and cellular localization of human renal OPN, we used a human PTC and DTC culture system that was developed in our laboratory (2426).

OPN immunostaining of these cultures resulted in a staining pattern comparable to the OPN staining pattern observed in injured rat kidneys, which is characterized by immediate OPN upregulation in >90% of the distal tubules and de novo OPN expression in the proximal tubular segments (5,6). Correspondingly, 93 ± 5.6% of the DTC (EMA-positive) were OPN-positive in the in vitro model. Moreover, the presence of OPN on the plasma membrane is consistent with the apical localization of OPN observed in vivo (5,6). Intracellular OPN expression in DTC was masked by strong cell surface expression; intracellular perinuclear OPN staining was visible in only a few DTC. The in vitro intracellular OPN expression at the PTC level corresponds to the perinuclear vesicular OPN expression observed in vivo (5,6). In addition, weak plasma membrane staining of some PTC has been observed in vivo on regenerating PTC (6). It can be concluded that OPN localization in our cell cultures closely mimics the in vivo situation after toxic/ischemic renal damage. It is most likely that the detection of this pattern, indicating OPN upregulation in our cell cultures, is attributable to cellular stress caused by the cell culture procedure. In addition, OPN expression has been observed to be greater in renal cell cultures originating from older (>40 to 50 yr) individuals, compared with young (<10 to 20 yr) individuals (29). Because our kidney tissue donors were >50 yr of age, this finding may account to some degree for the pronounced OPN expression in our cultures. We attempted to alter OPN expression in our cell cultures with different stimuli (ATP depletion, HgCl2, transforming growth factor-{beta}, and lipopolysaccharide), but no OPN upregulation was observed. Therefore, our cell culture system reproduced the specific upregulated OPN expression pattern, which allowed us to investigate this pattern extensively.

We observed human renal OPN synthesis to be very similar in PTC and DTC. A single OPN transcript of 1.6 kb was observed in PTC and DTC. In addition, cell lysates and conditioned media of PTC and DTC contained the same three OPN forms, in comparable amounts. These findings indicate similar OPN transcription, translation, posttranslational modification, and secretion in PTC and DTC. OPN secretion by human tubular cells is in agreement with the presence of OPN in human urine (uropontin) (30,31). Posttranslational modification is supported by the detection of different OPN forms (with higher molecular masses than recombinant OPN) in the absence of alternative splicing. Moreover, the posttranslational modification of OPN in our culture system is identical to the posttranslational modification of OPN in vivo, as similar forms of OPN were observed in cell culture media and in urine.

These findings indicate that, in both PTC and DTC, the OPN protein passes through the Golgi apparatus after mRNA transcription in the nucleus and translation in the endoplasmic reticulum, before secretion. Indeed, we clearly demonstrated the presence of OPN in the Golgi apparatus. Therefore, the observed in vivo and in vitro intracellular OPN expression most likely corresponds to the posttranslational modification of OPN in the Golgi complex and its subsequent transport for secretion. This is consistent with immuno-electron microscopic studies that located OPN in the Golgi apparatus of epithelial cells in the gall bladder and gastric mucosa (32,33) and in the distal tubule of the kidney (14). In PTC, however, OPN has been observed primarily in cytoplasmic bodies with the ultrastructural appearance of endosomes and lysosomes (14,34). This indicates that OPN would accumulate in PTC by endocytosis, which is not consistent with OPN synthesis and secretion by PTC. However, it is possible that, as in DTC, at least part of the secreted OPN becomes linked with the plasma membrane but is immediately re-endocytosed. Such a mechanism would explain why OPN accumulates on cells with poorly developed endocytotic capacities, such as DTC and regenerating PTC. Observation of the endocytotic pathway in our cultures demonstrated that endocytotic/lysosomal vesicles were scattered throughout the cytoplasm, whereas intracellular OPN was confined to the perinuclear zone. Consequently, PTC endocytosis cannot account for the absence of OPN at the PTC membrane. This confirms that intracellular OPN corresponds primarily to OPN secretion and not to endocytosis. The possibility that differences in OPN localization are the result of different molecular mass OPN forms (with different biologic activities) in PTC and DTC can also be excluded, because PTC and DTC produced and secreted the same OPN isoforms, in comparable amounts.

The exact role of OPN in renal physiologic processes is still unclear (35). Therefore, it is difficult to ascribe a functional significance to the observed OPN expression pattern. Both PTC and DTC demonstrated perinuclear OPN staining, although it was masked by the strong extracellular plasma membrane OPN localization in DTC. This extracellular plasma membrane OPN localization pattern for DTC constituted the difference between PTC and DTC in both rats and human subjects, both in vivo and in vitro. It seems most reasonable that the perinuclear OPN staining reflects some common machinery involved in the synthesis of OPN (including the Golgi apparatus, in which OPN was clearly localized), whereas the extracellular plasma membrane OPN localization observed for DTC represents the difference between PTC and DTC. Because the synthesis and secretion of OPN are the same in PTC and DTC and because PTC endocytosis cannot account for this difference, a plausible hypothesis for this apical OPN localization involves a preferential binding capacity of OPN (secreted by both PTC and DTC) for the DTC membrane. It is possible that the presence of OPN at the DTC plasma membrane has consequences for the renal handling of casts (21) or crystals (79). Further research is needed to resolve this issue.


    Acknowledgments
 
During this study, Dr. A. Verhulst was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders. We thank Dr. J.-P. Timmermans (Laboratory for Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp) for excellent help with confocal microscopy, Dr. F. Roels for help with lysosomal staining, and D. De Weerdt and F. J. Geurts for graphical help. We express our gratitude to Dr. C. M. Giachelli (University of Washington) and Dr. L. W. Fisher (National Institutes of Health) for the generous gifts of the OP189 and LF123 antisera, respectively, and to Dr. M. Hook (ECM Research Center, University of Texas) for the recombinant OPN expression vector. This work would not have been possible without the generous cooperation of Dr. J. Gillis (Sint Lucas, Gent), Dr. J. Govaerts (Sint Maarten, Mechelen), Dr. G. Hendrickx (Jan Palfijn, Merksem), Dr. J. Braekman (University Hospital VUB, Jette), Dr. G. Schuerman (Sint Elisabeth, Turnhout), and Dr. D. Ysebaert (University Hospital Antwerpen).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Prince CW, Oosowa T, Butler WT, Tomana M, Bhown AS, Bhown M, Schrohenlober RE: Isolation, characterization, and biosynthesis of a phosphorylated glycoprotein from rat bone. J Biol Chem 262: 2900–2907, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hudkins KL, Giachelli CM, Cui Y, Couser WG, Johnson RJ, Alpers CE: Osteopontin expression in fetal and mature human kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 444–457, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kleinman JG, Behensky AM, Worcester EM, Brown D: Expression of osteopontin, a urinary inhibitor of stone mineral crystal growth, in rat kidney. Kidney Int 47: 1585–1596, 1995[Medline]
  4. Lopez CA, Hoyer JR, Wilson PD, Waterhouse P, Denhardt DT: Heterogeneity of osteopontin expression among nephrons in mouse kidneys and enhanced expression in sclerotic glomeruli. Lab Invest 69: 355–362, 1993[Medline]
  5. Persy VP, Verstrepen WA, Ysebaert DK, De Greef KE, De Broe ME: Differences in osteopontin up-regulation between proximal and distal tubules after renal ischemia/reperfusion. Kidney Int 56: 601–611, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Verstrepen WA, Persy VP, Verhulst A, Dauwe SE, De Broe ME: Renal osteopontin protein and mRNA upregulation during acute nephrotoxicity in the rat. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16: 712–724, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Asplin JR, Arsenault D, Parks JH, Coe FL, Hoyer JR: Contribution of human uropontin to inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization. Kidney Int 53: 194–199, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Shiraga H, Min W, Van Dusen WJ, Clayman MD, Miner D, Terrel CH, Sherbotie JH, Foreman JW, Przysiecki C, Neilson EG, Hoyer JR: Inhibition of calcium oxalate crystal growth in vitro by uropontin: Another member of the aspartic acid-rich protein superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 426–430, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hoyer JR, Asplin JR, Otvos L: Phosphorylated osteopontin peptides suppress crystallization by inhibiting the growth of calcium oxalate crystals. Kidney Int 60: 77–82, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Diamond JR, Kees-Folts D, Ricardo SD, Pruznak A, Eufemio M: Early and persistent up-regulated expression of renal cortical osteopontin in experimental hydronephrosis. Am J Pathol 146: 1455–1466, 1995[Abstract]
  11. Eddy AA, Giachelli CM: Renal expression of genes that promote interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in rats with protein-overload proteinuria. Kidney Int 47: 1546–1557, 1995[Medline]
  12. Fischer JW, Tschöpe C, Reinecke A, Giachelli CM, Unger T: Upregulation of osteopontin expression in renal cortex of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats is mediated by bradykinin. Diabetes 47: 1512–1518, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Giachelli CM, Pichler R, Lombardi D, Denhardt DT, Alpers CE, Schwartz S, Johnson RJ: Osteopontin expression in angiotensin II-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis. Kidney Int 45: 515–524, 1994[Medline]
  14. Madsen KM, Zhang L, Shamat AR, Siegfried S, Cha JH: Ultrastructural localization of osteopontin in the kidney: Induction by lipopolysaccharide. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1043–1053, 1997[Abstract]
  15. Magil AB, Pichler R, Johnson RJ: Osteopontin in chronic puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1383–1390, 1997[Abstract]
  16. Pichler R, Franceschini N, Young BA, Hugo C, Andoh T, Burdmann EA, Shankland SJ, Alpers CE, Bennet WM, Couser WG, Johnson RJ: Pathogenesis of cyclosporine nephropathy: Roles of angiotensin II and osteopontin. J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1186–1196, 1995[Abstract]
  17. Hwang SM, Lopez CA, Heck DE, Gardner CR, Laskin DL, Laskin JD, Denhardt DT: Osteopontin inhibits induction of nitric oxide synthase gene expression by inflammatory mediators in mouse kidney epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 269: 711–715, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Noiri E, Dickman K, Miller F, Romanov G, Romanov VI, Shaw R, Chambers AF, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Goligorsky MS: Reduced tolerance to acute renal ischemia in mice with a targeted disruption of the osteopontin gene. Kidney Int 56: 74–82, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Liaw L, Almeida M, Hart CE, Schwartz S, Giachelli CM: Osteopontin promotes vascular cell adhesion and spreading and is chemotactic for smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 74: 214–224, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Liaw L, Skinner MP, Raines EW, Ross R, Cheresh DA, Schwartz S: The adhesive and migratory effects of osteopontin are mediated via distinct cell surface integrins. J Clin Invest 95: 713–724, 1995
  21. Goligorsky MS, Noiri E, Kessler H, Romanov VI: Therapeutic potential of RGD peptides in acute renal failure. Kidney Int 51: 1487–1492, 1997[Medline]
  22. Ophascharoensuk V, Giachelli CM, Gordon K, Hughes J, Pichler R, Brown P, Liaw L, Schmidt R, Shankland SJ, Alpers CE, Couser WG, Johnson RJ: Obstructive uropathy in the mouse: Role of osteopontin in interstitial fibrosis and apoptosis. Kidney Int 56: 571–580, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Singh RP, Patarca R, Schwartz J, Singh P, Cantor H: Definition of a specific interaction between the early T lymphocyte activation 1 (Eta-1) protein and murine macrophages in vitro and its effect upon macrophages in vitro. J Exp Med 171: 1931–1942, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Helbert MF, Dauwe SE, De Broe ME: Flow cytometric immunodissection of the human nephron in vivo and in vitro. Exp Nephrol 7: 360–376, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Helbert MF, Dauwe SE, Van der Biest I, Nouwen EJ, De Broe ME: Immunodissection of the human proximal nephron: Flow sorting of S1/S2/S3, S1/S2 and S3 proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int 52: 414–428, 1997[Medline]
  26. Helbert MF, Dauwe SE, De Broe ME: Flow cytometric immunodissection of the human distal tubule and cortical collecting duct system. Kidney Int 59: 554–564, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Deng JT, Hoylaerts MF, Nouwen EJ, De Broe ME, Van Hoof VO: Purification of circulating liver plasma membrane fragments using a monoclonal antileucine aminopeptidase antibody. Hepatology 23: 445–454, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Gibsond ’Ambrosio RE, Samuel L, Chang CC, Trosko SE, d’Ambrosio SM: Characteristics of long term human epithelial cell cultures derived from normal human fetal cells. In Vitro 23: 279–287, 1983
  29. Hwang SM, Wilson PD, Laskin JD, Denhardt DT: Age and development-related changes in osteopontin and nitric oxide synthase mRNA levels in human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells: Contrasting responses to hypoxia and reoxygenation. J Cell Biol 160: 61–68, 1994
  30. Min W, Shiraga H, Chalko C, Goldfarb S, Krishna G, Hoyer JR: Quantitative studies of human urinary excretion of uropontin. Kidney Int 53: 189–193, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Yasui T, Fujita K, Hayashi Y, Ueda K, Kon S, Maeda M, Uede T, Kohri K: Quantification of osteopontin in the urine of healthy and stone-forming men. Urol Res 27: 225–230, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Qu-Hong, Brown LF, Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM: Ultrastructural immunogold localization of osteopontin in human gastric mucosa. J Histochem Cytochem 45: 21–33, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Qu-Hong, Brown LF, Senger DR, Geng LL, Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM: Ultrastructural immunogold localization of osteopontin in human gallbladder epithelial cells. J Histochem Cytochem 42: 351–361, 1994[Abstract]
  34. Gerstenfield LC, Upurova T, Ashkar S, Salih E, Gotoh Y, McKee MD, Nanci A, Glimcher MJ: Regulation of avian osteopontin pre-and posttranscriptional expression in skeletal muscle. Ann NY Acad Sci 760: 67–81, 1994[CrossRef]
  35. Xie Y, Sakatsume M, Nishi S, Narita I, Arakawa M, Gejyo F: Expression, roles, receptors, and regulation of osteopontin in the kidney. Kidney Int 60: 1645–1657, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
Received for publication July 24, 2001. Accepted for publication January 20, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
P.-L. Chang, L. Harkins, Y.-H. Hsieh, P. Hicks, K. Sappayatosok, S. Yodsanga, S. Swasdison, A. F. Chambers, C. A. Elmets, and K.-J. Ho
Osteopontin Expression in Normal Skin and Non-melanoma Skin Tumors
J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 2008; 56(1): 57 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
S. H. Moochhala, J. A. Sayer, G. Carr, and N. L. Simmons
Renal calcium stones: insights from the control of bone mineralization
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L. Packer, S. Pavey, A. Parker, M. Stark, P. Johansson, B. Clarke, P. Pollock, M. Ringner, and N. Hayward
Osteopontin is a downstream effector of the PI3-kinase pathway in melanomas that is inversely correlated with functional PTEN
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1778 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A K Katakam, G Chipitsyna, Q Gong, A R Vancha, J Gabbeta, and H A Arafat
Streptozotocin (STZ) mediates acute upregulation of serum and pancreatic osteopontin (OPN): a novel islet-protective effect of OPN through inhibition of STZ-induced nitric oxide production
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 187(2): 237 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. Verhulst, P. C. D'Haese, and M. E. De Broe
Inhibitors of HMG-CoA Reductase Reduce Receptor-mediated Endocytosis in Human Kidney Proximal Tubular Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 2249 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M. Simeoni, A. Boyde, D. G. Shirley, G. Capasso, and R. J. Unwin
Application of red laser video-rate scanning confocal microscopy to in vivo assessment of tubular function in the rat: selective action of diuretics on tubular diameter
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2004; 89(2): 181 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Asselman, A. Verhulst, M. E. de Broe, and C. F. Verkoelen
Calcium Oxalate Crystal Adherence to Hyaluronan-, Osteopontin-, and CD44-Expressing Injured/Regenerating Tubular Epithelial Cells in Rat Kidneys
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3155 - 3166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. Verhulst, M. Asselman, V. P. Persy, M. S.J. Schepers, M. F. Helbert, C. F. Verkoelen, and M. E. De Broe
Crystal Retention Capacity of Cells in the Human Nephron: Involvement of CD44 and Its Ligands Hyaluronic Acid and Osteopontin in the Transition of a Crystal Binding- into a Nonadherent Epithelium
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verhulst, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Broe, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verhulst, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Broe, M. E.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP