Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sévaux, R. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J. F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sévaux, R. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J. F. M.
J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1608-1614, 2002
© 2002 American Society of Nephrology

Treatment with Vitamin D and Calcium Reduces Bone Loss after Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Study

Ruud G. L. de Sévaux*, Andries J. Hoitsma*, Frans H. M. Corstens{dagger} and Jack F. M. Wetzels*

Departments of *Nephrology and {dagger} Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen,The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr. R. G. L. de Sévaux, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-24-3614761; Fax: 31-24-3540022; E-mail: r.desevaux{at}nefro.azn.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. A decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) is a major complication of renal transplantation (RTx), predominantly occurring within the first 6 mo after RTx. The most important causative factor is the use of corticosteroids, but persisting hyperparathyroidism and abnormalities in vitamin D metabolism play a role too. This study examines the effect of treatment with calcium and active vitamin D on the loss of BMD in the first 6 mo after RTx. A total of 111 renal transplant recipients (65 men, 46 women; age, 47 ± 13 yr) were randomized to either treatment with active vitamin D (0.25 µg/d) plus calcium (1000 mg/d) (CaD group), or to no treatment (NoT group). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil. Laboratory parameters and BMD (lumbar spine and hip) were measured at 0, 1 (laboratory only), 3, and 6 mo after RTx. Lumbar BMD was nearly normal at the time of RTx. In both groups, a significant decrease in lumbar BMD was observed during the first 3 mo (CaD, -3.3 ± 4.3%; P < 0.0001; NoT, -4.1 ± 4.8%; P < 0.0001). Between the third day and sixth month, lumbar BMD slightly recovered in the CaD group, but it decreased further in the NoT group (total loss 0 to 6 mo: CaD, -2.6 ± 5.0% [P < 0.001]; NoT, -5.0 ± 4.7% [P < 0.0001]). As a result, the amount of bone loss at 6 mo was significantly lower in the CaD group (P = 0.02). Loss of BMD at the different femoral sites was also significantly reduced in the CaD group. Apart from a trend toward more frequent hypercalcemia in the CaD group, no clinical or biochemical differences existed between the groups. Treatment with a low dose of active vitamin D and calcium partially prevents bone loss at the lumbar spine and proximal femur during the first 6 mo after RTx.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After renal transplantation (RTx), an important loss of bone mineral density is observed (13), which contributes to an increased incidence of fractures (4,5). The exact mechanism of this increased bone loss is unknown, but several factors might play a role: the use of corticosteroids and possibly cyclosporine, persisting hyperparathyroidism, and disturbances in vitamin D metabolism (68).

Few data are available regarding possible preventive therapies (9). Bisphosphonates are currently the most promising agents in the prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (10). However, they are contraindicated in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency, mainly because of the lack of data regarding the safety of bisphosphonates in patients with renal osteodystrophy. There are serious concerns, especially for patients with preexisting low bone turnover disease (diabetes mellitus, aluminum exposure), where bisphosphonates could further slow down the rate of bone turnover and thus increase the fracture rate (11).

Another option for the prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis is treatment with calcium and (active) vitamin D. Several studies have documented the efficacy of such a treatment in non-transplant patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (12,13) as well as in patients after cardiac (14,15) and liver (16) transplantation.

Recent data from our center also support the use of active vitamin D immediately after RTx. In a prospective study, we have demonstrated that vitamin D metabolism is disturbed after RTx. In almost 50% of the patients, blood levels of 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D were below normal until 6 mo after RTx (3).

In this study, renal transplant recipients were randomized to treatment with calcium and active vitamin D or to no treatment during the first 6 mo after RTx. The data indicate that treatment attenuates bone loss after RTx.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
Adult recipients (>=18 yr) of a first or second renal transplant were eligible for this study. We excluded patients who had received corticosteroid treatment within 3 mo before RTx, patients after total parathyroidectomy, and patients treated with bisphosphonates, fluoride, calcitonin, or anabolic steroids at any time before RTx. Patients with hypercalcemia (adjusted [Ca], >2.80 mmol/L) that persisted during the first 2 wk after RTx were also excluded. Patients treated for hyperparathyroidism with calcium and/or vitamin D at the time of RTx as well as patients with diabetes mellitus or patients treated for hypothyroidism were eligible for the study. The study was approved by the hospital committee for studies in humans. All participants gave written informed consent.

Study Design
Patients were randomly assigned to either treatment with 0.25 µg of 1{alpha}-hydroxy vitamin D (Etalpha; Leo Pharmaceuticals, Weesp, The Netherlands) plus calciumlactogluconate containing 1000 mg of elemental calcium (Calcium Sandoz Fortissimum; Novartis Pharma, Arnhem, The Netherlands) or to no treatment. Treatment was started after graft function was obtained, but not later than 1 mo after RTx. If severe hypercalcemia occurred (adjusted [Ca], >2.80 mmol/L), the study medication had to be interrupted and eventually stopped definitively. If hypercalcemia persisted after stopping the medication or if hypercalcemia occurred in the control group, bisphosphonates could be prescribed to reduce serum calcium. In case of a need for diuretic therapy, loop diuretics were used to prevent hypercalcemia associated with the use of thiazide diuretics.

Routine laboratory measurements (serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, alkaline phosphatase) were performed during regular follow-up, at least monthly. Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and 25 hydroxy vitamin D were measured just before RTx and at 1, 3, and 6 mo after RTx. Twenty-four–hour urine collections were analyzed for creatinine, calcium, sodium, and protein excretion at 3 and 6 mo after RTx. Bone mineral density was assessed within 2 wk after RTx and again at 3 and 6 mo after RTx.

Immunosuppression
During the first 6 mo after RTx, immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine (CsA), prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), except for recipients of a graft from an HLA-identical living related donor. The latter patients were treated with CsA and prednisone during the first 3 mo, after which CsA was replaced by azathioprine. The dose of prednisone was 100 mg/d intravenously for the first 3 d and 0.35 mg/kg per d for the first month; the dose was then gradually tapered to 0.10 mg/kg per d at 3 mo. CsA was dosed to a level of 150 to 300 ng/ml during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml thereafter. MMF was prescribed in a fixed dose of 1000 mg twice daily. Rejection treatment consisted of 1000 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone for 3 consecutive days. Steroid-resistant rejections were treated with antithymocyte globulin or an extended course of oral high-dose prednisone (1500 mg within 2 wk).

Laboratory Measurements
Routine biochemical measurements were performed in the central clinical chemistry laboratory, using a Hitachi 747 automated analyzer (Hitachi Inc., Tokyo, Japan). 25 hydroxy vitamin D was assessed using an HPLC method (17). The normal value range is 10 to 34 ng/ml. Intact PTH was measured using a commercial assay (Nichols, San Juan Capistrano, CA). The normal value range is 1.0 to 6.5 pmol/L.

Bone Densitometry
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L1 to L4) and the right proximal femur was measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry using the Hologic QDR 1000 or QDR 4500 densitometer (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA). The coefficient of variation (CV) of daily measurements of the lumbar spine phantom was 0.4%. The CV of lumbar spine measurements in healthy controls was 1.0% in our laboratory (data not published). All bone mineral density measurements in one patient were performed using the same densitometer. Z and T scores were calculated using the Hologic reference database.

Radiography
A radiograph of the lumbar spine was obtained at entry into the study. If patients had symptoms suggestive of a vertebral fracture during the study, this radiograph was repeated. If a vertebral fracture was diagnosed, the densitometry result of this vertebra was excluded from the analysis.

In case of other musculoskeletal complaints, additional investigations were performed according to the judgment of the physician.

Power Calculation and Randomization Procedure
Assuming a reduction of the estimated bone loss from 8.8% (1) to 3.5% during the first 6 mo after RTx and a power of 0.80 and an {alpha} of 0.05, it was calculated that at least 31 patients should be included in each group. Because of the expected higher incidence of hypercalcemia in the treated group, randomization was performed in a 3:2 ratio for treated versus nontreated patients to obtain enough patients for evaluation of the treatment effect. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups, with stratification for sex, menopausal status, and corticosteroid use before 3 mo before RTx. Randomization was carried out by opening a sealed envelope with the lowest available study number.

Calculations and Statistical Analyses
The serum total calcium concentrations were adjusted for albumin following the equation:

adjusted calcium (mmol/L) = calcium - (0.025 x albumin) + 1 mmol/L (18).

The creatinine clearance was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation (19) and was calculated from 24-h urine collections.

Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Comparison of continuous variables was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Spearman’s rank test was used for correlation analyses. Categorical variables were analyzed with Fisher’s exact test.

Calculations were performed using the SAS system (version 6.12; SAS institute, Cary, NC). Results are expressed as mean ± SD unless stated otherwise. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
One hundred thirteen renal graft recipients transplanted in our hospital between January 1998 and April 2000 participated in this study. Two patients who lost their graft before a second BMD measurement was obtained were excluded from the analysis. Demographic characteristics of the remaining 111 patients are given in Table 1. Patients were included on average 14 ± 6 d after RTx (range, 7 to 30 d). Sixty-five patients were allocated to treatment with vitamin D and calcium (CaD group), and 46 patients to no treatment (NoT group). No differences between both groups existed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Patient characteristicsa
 
Renal Function
Immediate graft function was obtained in 98 patients. Delayed graft function occurred in 13 patients (8 in the CaD group, 5 in the NoT group; NS); eventually, all grafts functioned well within 3 wk. During the study period, graft failure due to chronic allograft nephropathy occurred in one patient in the CaD group. No patient death occurred. Two patients in the NoT group developed a proteinuria of >1 g/d, presumably also due to chronic allograft nephropathy.

Immunosuppression and Rejections
Initial immunosuppressive treatment consisted of CsA, MMF and prednisone in 100 patients during the first 6 mo after RTx. There were eight recipients of a kidney from an HLA-identical living related donor who received CsA and prednisone (three patients in the CaD group, five patients in the NoT group; NS). One patient in each group was treated with CsA and prednisone, and one patient in the CaD group was treated with CsA, prednisone, and azathioprine throughout the study.

During the study period, 93 of 100 patients started on triple immunosuppressive therapy continued this combination. In four patients, CsA was stopped because of intolerable side effects while continuing MMF and prednisone (three patients in the CaD group, one patient in the NoT group; NS). In one patient in each group, MMF was stopped while continuing CsA and prednisone. In one patient in the NoT group, both CsA and MMF were stopped and replaced by azathioprine while continuing prednisone. In the other 11 patients, no unplanned changes occurred.

The cumulative oral prednisone dose was similar in either patient group (Table 2). The incidence of acute rejections was also similar in both groups (23% in the CaD group, 24% in the NoT group; NS). Rejections in most patients were treated successfully with intravenous methylprednisolone. Additional treatment with anti–T cell antibodies was given in seven patients in the CaD group and in three patients in the NoT group (NS; Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Clinical outcome
 
Biochemical Measurements
Biochemical data are summarized in Table 3. The iPTH level rapidly decreased within the first month after RTx. A small further decline occurred between 1 and 3 mo. Thereafter, the iPTH level stabilized, albeit at slightly elevated levels in both groups. There were no differences in iPTH and adjusted calcium levels between the treated and the control group at any time point. In both groups, alkaline phosphatase increased significantly within the normal range from baseline to 3 mo after RTx.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Biochemical results
 
Bone Mineral Density Measurements
At study entry, lumbar BMD was numerically lower in the CaD group, and the difference in Z score reached statistical significance (Table 4). In the first 3 mo after RTx, lumbar BMD decreased by -3.3 ± 4.3% in the CaD group (P < 0.0001) and -4.1 ± 4.8% in the NoT group (P < 0.0001; NS between groups). In the following months, there was a recovery of lumbar BMD in the CaD group (+0.7 ± 4.5%; ns) and a further decrease in the NoT group (-0.9 ± 3.3%; NS), resulting in a significant difference (P = 0.02) in the amount of loss in lumbar BMD between the groups at 6 mo after RTx (CaD, -2.6 ± 5.0% [P < 0.001]; NoT, -5.0 ± 4.7% [P < 0.0001]; Figure 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Bone mineral density at study entry
 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Change in bone mineral density (% from baseline ± SEM; significance shown for differences between groups at 6 mo).

 
In the CaD group, baseline BMD in the femoral neck and the trochanteric region were significantly lower than in the NoT group (Table 4). At the femoral neck, a significantly larger loss of BMD was found in the NoT group during the first 6 mo (CaD, -0.22 ± 6.0% [NS]; NoT, -4.0 ± 6.0% [P < 0.0001]; between groups, P < 0.001). At the trochanteric region, the amount of bone loss was also significantly higher in the NoT group (CaD, -2.2 ± 5.6% [P < 0.01]; NoT, -4.3 ± 5.7% [P < 0.0001]; between groups, P < 0.05). In Ward’s triangle, BMD did not change significantly over time in either group. In the total proximal femur, there was a nonsignificant loss of BMD in the CaD group during the first 6 mo after RTx (-0.97 ± 4.9%; ns), whereas the loss of BMD in the NoT group was significantly larger (-3.0 ± 4.2%; P < 0.0001; between groups, P < 0.01).

As noted before, there was an unexpected difference in BMD between the groups at the time of RTx. To exclude that this difference in baseline BMD could have biased the data, we have performed a second analysis. For this analysis, patients in the CaD group were matched for BMD with patients from the NoT group, thus excluding 19 patients from the CaD group. When comparing these newly formed groups, no more differences in baseline BMD were apparent. During the first 6 mo after RTx, lumbar BMD decreased by -2.5 ± 5.2% in the CaD group and by -5.0 ± 4.7% in the NoT group (P < 0.05). At the femoral neck, the loss in BMD was -0.8 ± 5.2% in the CaD group (NS) and -4.0 ± 6.0% in the NoT group (P < 0.01).

Side Effects and Other Events
Severe hypercalcemia (adjusted serum calcium, >2.80 mmol/L on more than one occasion) was slightly more frequent in the CaD group (six patients) than in the NoT group (two patients), but this was NS (Table 2). Nearly all patients who developed hypercalcemia already had a high-normal serum calcium at inclusion in the study. Urinary calcium excretion was similar at 3 mo in the two groups, but it was slightly higher in the CaD group at 6 mo after RTx (Table 3). One patient in the CaD group had a renal calculus shortly after stopping treatment with calcium and vitamin D due to hypercalcemia. Multiple vertebral fractures occurred in two patients in the NoT group. One patient in the CaD group suffered from avascular necrosis of the right hip.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our study clearly demonstrates that treatment with active vitamin D and calcium during the first 6 mo after renal transplantation reduces bone loss in the lumbar spine and the trochanteric region and almost completely prevents bone loss in the femoral neck. Theoretically, the results could have been biased by the slight but significant differences in baseline BMD between the groups. However, additional analysis of the data indicated that these differences could not explain the results.

Our findings are in agreement with our observation that vitamin D metabolism is disturbed in the majority of renal transplant recipients in the first months after renal transplantation. In more than 50% of patients, levels of active vitamin D remain below the lowest threshold of normal in this period, which may be an important factor in causing a decreased bone mineralization (3).

We have used a fixed dose of 1{alpha}-hydroxy vitamin D and have not measured 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D levels. Thus, we cannot exclude that higher doses of active vitamin D may have been needed to obtain even better results. Future studies must answer this question. However, increasing the dose of active vitamin D will increase the incidence of hypercalcemia, and thus may not be feasible. In this study, hypercalcemia occurred in 9% of treated patients and treatment had to be stopped in 6%.

The use of corticosteroids is regarded to be the most important causative factor in posttransplant osteoporosis. Several strategies have proved efficacy in the treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in nonrenal patients, including calcium combined with active vitamin D (12,13), calcitonin (12), and bisphosphonates (10,20). In recipients of heart and liver transplants, calcitriol and bisphosphonates were both effective in reducing bone loss during the first postoperative year (1416,21).

Few studies have addressed the accelerated bone loss during the first 6 mo after renal transplantation, and most data are reported in abstract form only. Our conclusion on the efficacy of a regimen containing calcium and vitamin D is supported by data of a nonrandomized study of Talalaj et al. (22), who reported that treatment with 25 hydroxy vitamin D in an initial dose of 40 µg/d plus calcium carbonate 3000 mg/d partially prevented bone loss during the first year after renal transplantation. Preliminary data from a randomized trial are also suggestive for a beneficial effect of cholecalciferol (23).

Calcitonin or bisphosphonates could be alternative treatment options. In a randomized trial comparing 200 U/d nasal calcitonin with placebo during the first year after RTx, calcitonin largely prevented bone loss (24). In a small randomized trial, two intravenous doses of pamidronate given at the time of renal transplantation and again 1 mo later, prevented bone loss at the femoral neck and possibly the lumbar spine during the first year after renal transplantation (25). However, this study has been criticized because of statistical shortcomings, and the conclusions have been partially withdrawn by the authors (26). In a recently published randomized trial, ibandronate given intravenously immediately before and at 3, 6, and 9 mo after transplantation prevented bone loss in the lumbar spine and the proximal femur nearly completely during the first year after transplantation (27).

Data concerning other options such as treatment with hormone replacement therapy, with anabolic steroids, or with fluoride in patients after renal transplantation are lacking.

Currently, bisphosphonates are the most promising agents for the treatment of osteoporosis, with proven efficacy in patients with postmenopausal (28,29) and corticosteroid-induced (30,31) osteoporosis. Although the two studies mentioned above suggest that bisphosphonates are also effective in preventing bone loss after renal transplantation, there is much concern about the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency. Bisphosphonates will accumulate in bone in patients with renal insufficiency, eventually resulting in a defective mineralization, thus paradoxically increasing the fracture risk.

The use of bisphosphonates is even more complex in patients with renal osteodystrophy. Renal osteodystrophy is not one entity, but encompasses several bone abnormalities with either high bone turnover (hyperparathyroidism), low bone turnover (osteomalacia and adynamic bone disease), or a mixed osteodystrophy with characteristics of high and low bone turnover. The effect of bisphosphonates may differ, depending on the underlying abnormality; beneficial effects may be expected in patients with predominantly high bone turnover (32), whereas problems may be worsened in patients with adynamic bone disease. Thus, it seems unwise to administer bisphosphonates to patients after renal transplantation without proper knowledge of bone morphology (11).

In conclusion, our data provide compelling evidence that treatment with low dose of active vitamin D and calcium is safe and partially prevents rapid bone loss during the first 6 mo after RTx. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy of even higher doses of active vitamin D and to delineate any additional benefits of bisphosphonates.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Martin Engels, technician at the department of nuclear medicine, for expert assistance in performing the bone mineral density measurements and Ms. Marjo van Helden, research nurse, for invaluable help in collecting the data.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Julian BA, Laskow DA, Dubovsky J, Dubovsky EV, Curtis JJ, Quarles LD: Rapid loss of vertebral mineral density after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 325: 544–550, 1991[Abstract]
  2. Horber FF, Casez JP, Steiger U, Czerniak A, Montandon A, Jaeger P: Changes in bone mass early after kidney transplantation. J Bone Miner Res 9: 1–9, 1994[Medline]
  3. de Sévaux RGL, Hoitsma AJ, van Hoof HJC, Corstens FJM, Wetzels JFM: Vitamin D metabolism and bone mineral density after kidney transplantation [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 550, 1997
  4. Grotz WH, Mundinger FA, Gugel B, Exner V, Kirste G, Schollmeyer PJ: Bone fracture and osteodensitometry with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 58: 912–915, 1994[Medline]
  5. Ramsey Goldman R, Dunn JE, Dunlop DD, Stuart FP, Abecassis MM, Kaufman DB, Langman CB, Salinger MH, Sprague SM: Increased risk of fracture in patients receiving solid organ transplants. J Bone Miner Res 14: 456–463, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Julian BA, Quarles LD, Niemann KM: Musculoskeletal complications after renal transplantation: Pathogenesis and treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 19: 99–120, 1992[Medline]
  7. Epstein S: Post-transplantation bone disease: The role of immunosuppressive agents and the skeleton. J Bone Miner Res 11: 1–7, 1996[Medline]
  8. Massari PU: Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism after renal transplantation. Kidney Int 52: 1412–1421, 1997[Medline]
  9. Moe SM: The treatment of steroid-induced bone loss in transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 6: 544–549, 1997[Medline]
  10. Adachi JD, Bensen WG, Brown J, Hanley D, Hodsman A, Josse R, Kendler DL, Lentle B, Olszynski W, Ste Marie LG, Tenenhouse A, Chines AA: Intermittent etidronate therapy to prevent corticosteroid- induced osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 337: 382–387, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Malluche HH: The possible use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of renal osteodystrophy. Clin Nephrol 38 [Suppl 1]: S87–S91, 1992
  12. Sambrook P, Birmingham J, Kelly P, Kempler S, Nguyen T, Pocock N, Eisman J: Prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis. A comparison of calcium, calcitriol, and calcitonin. N Engl J Med 328: 1747–1752, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Adachi JD, Bensen WG, Bianchi F, Cividino A, Pillersdorf S, Sebaldt RJ, Tugwell P, Gordon M, Steele M, Webber C, Goldsmith CH: Vitamin D and calcium in the prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: a 3 year followup. J Rheumatol 23: 95–1000, 1996
  14. Henderson K, Eisman J, Keogh A, Macdonald P, Glanville A, Spratt P, Sambrook P: Protective effect of short-term Calcitriol or cyclical Etidronate on bone loss after cardiac or lung transplantation. J Bone Miner Res 16: 565–571, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Van Cleemput J, Daenen W, Geusens P, Dequeker P, Van De Werf F, Vanhaecke J: Prevention of bone loss in cardiac transplant recipients. A comparison of biphosphonates and vitamin D. Transplantation 61: 1495–1499, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Neuhaus R, Lohmann R, Platz KP, Guckelberger O, Schon M, Lang M, Hierholzer J, Neuhaus P: Treatment of osteoporosis after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 27: 1226–1227, 1995[Medline]
  17. Dabek JT, Harkonen M, Wahlroos O, Adlercreutz H: Assay for plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by high performance liquid chromatography. Clin Chem 27: 1346–1351, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Payne RB, Little AJ, Williams RB, Milner JR: Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins. Br Med J 4: 643–646, 1973
  19. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16: 31–41, 1976[Medline]
  20. Saag KG, Emkey R, Schnitzer TJ, Brown JP, Hawkins F, Goemaere S, Thamsborg G, Liberman UA, Delmas PD, Malice MP, Czachur M, Daifotis AG: Alendronate for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid- induced osteoporosis. Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Intervention Study Group. N Engl J Med 339: 292–299, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Valero MA, Loinaz C, Larrodera L, Leon M, Moreno E, Hawkins F: Calcitonin and bisphosphonates treatment in bone loss after liver transplantation. Calcif Tissue Int 57: 15–19, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Talalaj M, Gradowska L, Marcinowska Suchowierska E, Durlik M, Gaciong Z, Lao M: Efficiency of preventive treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium in kidney transplant patients. Transplant Proc 28: 3485–3487, 1996[Medline]
  23. Wissing M, Broeders N, Schoutens A, Stallenberg B, Borré B, Abramowicz D: Effect of calcium and cholecalciferol treatment on bone mineral density in renal transplant recipients [Abstract]. Am J Transpl 1: 148, 2001
  24. Nordal KP, Halse J, Kronborg J, Dahl E: The effect of nasal calcitonin on bone mineral density in renal transplant recipients [Abstract].In: 7th ESOT Congress Abstract Book., 1995,pp 112
  25. Fan SL, Almond MK, Ball E, Evans K, Cunningham J: Pamidronate therapy as prevention of bone loss following renal transplantation. Kidney Int 57: 684–690, 2000[Medline]
  26. Svendsen OL: Statistical error in pamidronate study? Kidney Int 58: 465–466, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Grotz W, Nagel C, Poeschel D, Cybulla M, Petersen KG, Uhl M, Strey C, Kirste G, Olschewski M, Reichelt A, Rump LC: Effect of ibandronate on bone loss and renal function after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 1530–1537, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett CE, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ: Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: Results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280: 2077–2082, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE: Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348: 1535–1541, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Adachi JD, Roux C, Pitt P, Cooper C, Moniz C, Dequeker J, Ioannidis G, Cawley MI, Jenkins EA, Walker-Bone KE, Pack S, Stephenson GF, Laan RF, Brown J, Geusens P: A pooled data analysis on the use of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy for the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid induced bone loss. J Rheumatol 27: 2424–2431, 2000[Medline]
  31. Homik JE, Cranney A, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells G, Adachi JD, Suarez-Almazor ME: A metaanalysis on the use of bisphosphonates in corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 26: 1148–1157, 2001
  32. Ittel TH, Schmidt H, Brandenburg V, Sieberth HG: Intermittent oral calcitriol and intravenous pamidronate in renal allograft recipients: divergent effects on bone metabolism and parathyroid function [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 575A, 1997
Received for publication February 7, 2002. Accepted for publication February 23, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. Mastrobattista, V. Gomez-Lobo, and for the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Pregnancy After Solid Organ Transplantation
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2008; 112(4): 919 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. R. Weisinger, R. G. Carlini, E. Rojas, and E. Bellorin-Font
Bone Disease after Renal Transplantation
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 1(6): 1300 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sévaux, R. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J. F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sévaux, R. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J. F. M.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP