Linkage of a Gene Causing Familial Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type III to Chromosome 1
John J. Neary*,
Peter J. Conlon*,
David Croke,
Anthony Dorman,
Mary Keogan,
Feng Yu Zhang,
Jeffery M. Vance,
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance,
William K. Scott and
Michelle P. Winn
Departments of *Nephrology and Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Biochemistry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Correspondence to Dr. Michelle P. Winn, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2903, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: 919-660-0038; Fax: 919-681-7894; E-mail: mwinn{at}chg.mc.duke.edu
ABSTRACT. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) typeIII is a chronic progressive renal disease of unknown cause.The diagnosis is based on renal pathologic features (specificallyimmunofluorescence staining patterns and ultrastructural appearance).Mesangial cell proliferation and subendothelial and subepithelialdeposits characterize the renal disease. Although the actualprevalence of this disease is not known, the disease is rareand usually sporadic. The clinical features of MPGN includethe nephrotic syndrome and hematuria, with renal dysfunctionoccurring in approximately 50% of patients. Progression to end-stagerenal disease is variable, and some patients exhibit stabilizationor even improvement. Here is presented an Irish family in whichthere are eight affected members in four generations, suggestingautosomal dominant inheritance. This is the only reported familywith an inherited form of MPGN type III. To evaluate the diseasein this family, a genome-wide scan was performed with a panelof 402 polymorphic microsatellite markers, defining a grid withan average resolution of 10 cM (centimorgans). Significant evidencefor linkage was observed on chromosome 1q3132, with amaximal logarithm of the odds score of 3.86 at = 0.00 for microsatellitemarker GATA135F02. Recombination events among affected individuals,as detected by haplotype analysis, established a 22-cM minimalcandidate region flanked by markers D1S3470 and GATA124F08.The data provide evidence for a gene for familial MPGN on chromosome1q.
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is a chronicprogressive renal disease that is diagnosed on the basis ofrenal pathologic features. MPGN is subdivided into types I,II, and III on the basis of histologic, immunofluorescence staining,and complement profile differences. All types are characterizedby mesangial cell proliferation and capillary wall thickening.Type I is distinguished by subendothelial immune complex depositionand activation of the classic pathway of complement activation.Type II is distinguished by dense deposits within the glomerularbasement membrane and type III by deposits in the subepithelialand subendothelial areas. Both types II and III demonstrateactivation of the alternative complement pathway. Familial formsof MPGN types I and II have been described, with autosomal dominantand recessive modes of inheritance. To date, this is the onlyreported family with inherited type III disease; most reportedcases are sporadic, with no known family history of MPGN (1).
The epidemiologic features of MPGN type III are poorly understood.However, it is known to be a rare form of glomerulonephritis,accounting for <1% of glomerulonephritis diagnoses in registrydata (2). It typically presents with hematuria at an early age,and it progresses to end-stage renal disease by 10 yr afterpresentation in approximately 50% of cases. Treatment of thecondition with steroids and anticoagulants yields variable results(3). Recurrence after transplantation is rare (1,4). Histologicassessments reveal mesangial proliferation and capillary wallthickening resulting from mesangial cell interposition. Electronmicroscopy reveals subendothelial, mesangial, and subepithelialdeposits (5); glomerular basement membrane lamellation has alsobeen described (6). The pathogenesis of the condition is unknown,although West and McAdams (7) proposed that the condition mightbe the result of perturbation of complement by a slow-actingnephritic factor.
The family described here is unique. There are eight affectedmembers in three generations and male-to-male transmission,suggesting autosomal dominant transmission. In recent years,a number of forms of glomerulonephritis, including focal segmentalglomerulosclerosis (8) and congenital nephrotic syndrome (9),have been recognized as having genetic origins. An understandingof the pathogenesis of the hereditary forms of these diseasesmight lead to a better understanding of how the more commonsporadic forms develop.
Family Studies
Ethics committee approval was obtained from Beaumont Hospital(Dublin, Ireland) and Duke University Medical Center. Signedinformed consent was obtained from all participants before thestart of the study. Evaluation of each individual included therecording of a comprehensive medical history, BP measurements,urinalysis, analysis of a 24-h urine sample for protein levels,and measurement of serum albumin levels, if possible. Becausecomplement is sometimes activated in the sporadic form of thisdisease, complement studies (C3 and C4) were performed for allavailable family members considered to be affected or of unknownstatus. To reduce the possibility of phenocopies, all affectedindividuals were tested for hepatitis B and hepatitis C andwere screened for systemic lupus erythematosus with anti-nuclearantibody. Blood samples were also obtained for DNA extraction.Family members were considered to be affected if they had renalbiopsy-proven MPGN type III (in the absence of any causes ofsecondary disease), were undergoing dialysis, had undergonerenal transplantation, or exhibited 3+ proteinuria and/or 3+hematuria in qualitative urinalyses (or 300 mg protein/24 h)on two occasions. Individuals were categorized as being of unknownstatus if they exhibited urinary abnormalities less than thosedefined above and were categorized as being unaffected if theyexhibited no detectable urinary abnormalities in qualitativeurinalyses or were unrelated married-in spouses.
DNA Isolation and Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood by using a phenol/ethanolextraction protocol. Fluorescence genotyping was performed asdescribed previously (10), with 143 prelabeled multiplex primersets, comprising 402 microsatellite markers and providing anaverage grid of 10 cM across the genome. A Hitachi FMBIOII Multiviewfluorescent image scanner (MiraiBio Inc., Alameda, CA) was usedfor detection; BioImage software (RMLuton Inc., Jackson, MI)was used to analyze images, and data were entered into the PEDIGENEdatabase management system (11).
Analyses
Two-point and multipoint logarithm of the odds (LOD) scoreswere calculated by using the VITESSE statistical program (12).Two autosomal dominant models were analyzed, i.e., (1) a "fullpedigree" model, with 99.5% penetrance and a 0.5% phenocopyrate, and (2) an "affecteds-only" model, in which only affectedindividuals contributed to the LOD score; information from otherpedigree members was used only to establish linkage phase. Foreach model, a disease allele frequency of 0.001 was assumed.Significant evidence in favor of linkage was declared when theLOD values at any recombination were 3. One-unit support intervalsfor the maximal-likelihood estimate of were calculated fromtwo-point LOD scores by means of the one-unit-down method (13).Marker allele frequencies were calculated by using 100 chromosomesfrom unrelated Caucasian subjects (http://www.chg.mc.duke.edu/index.html).Map distances for the marker loci were obtained from publisheddata (http://research.marshfieldclinic.org/genetics/). The maximalattainable LOD scores for the pedigree, using the full pedigreeand affecteds-only models, were calculated via computer simulationwith the SIMLINK 4.1 program (14). With the assumption of afour-allele system with frequencies of 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1,simulations used a marker heterozygosity of 0.7 and 5% recombinationwith the disease locus. Haplotype analysis was performed asdescribed previously (15), to identify critical recombinationevents. The analysis was performed via visual inspection andwas confirmed by using SIMWALK software (16). A candidate intervalwas considered excluded when two affected individuals withinthe pedigree inherited different haplotypes.
Family Data
Family data have been described previously (1) and are presentedin Figure 1. Briefly, this is a four-generation, 51-member kindredfrom southern Ireland. A total of 39 blood samples were obtainedfor DNA extraction, including samples from eight affected, threeunknown, and 28 unaffected individuals. Individuals who werenot available for examination were considered to be of unknownstatus. Brief clinical descriptions are provided in Table 1.The mean age at the time of diagnosis of renal disease was 27.3yr (range, 4 to 51 yr). Five of the eight affected individualshad biopsy-proven MPGN type III. For individual III:5, MPGN(without subclassification) had been diagnosed via light microscopy25 yr earlier; electron microscopic evaluation was not performed.There was no evidence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or systemiclupus erythematosus for any of the affected individuals. Twoof the affected individuals received renal transplants. Oneaffected individual developed recurrence of the disease in theallograft and subsequently underwent a second transplant. Screeningof the family revealed one new case, which was subsequentlyconfirmed via renal biopsy, and two additional family memberswho were probably affected. Hypocomplementemia was observedonly transiently in the index case at the time of presentationand was not noted for other family members who underwent complementstudies.
Figure 1. Autosomal dominant family with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III. The family is a four-generation, 51-member kindred from southern Ireland. Ages (in years) are indicated below the generation:individual numbers. Genders have been concealed for privacy. There was male-to-male transmission of the disease.
Table 1. Clinical details for affected individualsa
Linkage Analysis
Power calculations established that the maximal attainable LODscore for the full pedigree model was 6.50, with a mean LODscore of 4.10. Simulation results for the affecteds-only modelindicated a maximal LOD score of 2.66 and a mean maximal LODscore of 1.63. A genome-wide screen analysis yielded evidencefor linkage to chromosome 1. The maximal LOD score obtainedwith the full pedigree model was 3.86, at marker GATA135F02(Table 2). Supporting evidence for linkage was obtained at twoadjacent markers, i.e., D1S2625 (LOD = 1.68) and D1S1660 (LOD= 2.57). Results obtained with the affecteds-only model includeda maximal LOD score of 2.09 at GATA135F02, with adjacent markersD1S2625 and D1S1660 demonstrating LOD scores of 1.59 and 1.22,respectively. Full pedigree multipoint analysis of markers D1S2625,GATA135F02, and D1S1660 produced a maximal LOD score of 3.91at marker D1S1660 (data not shown). The maximal multipoint LODscore for the affecteds-only model was 2.10 at marker GATA135F02.No other regions of the genome contained LOD scores of >2.0(Figure 2).
Figure 2. Two-point logarithm of the odds (LOD) score histogram. A histogram of all positive two-point LOD scores was generated for the entire genome. No LOD scores were >2.00 except in the region of linkage on chromosome 1.
To further define the minimal candidate region, haplotypes wereconstructed by using nine microsatellite markers, spanning theregion from 202 cM to 240 cM on chromosome 1 (Figure 3). Therecombinations observed among affected individuals establisheda minimal candidate interval of 22 cM, between markers D1S3470and GATA124F08. It is noteworthy that one individual classifiedas unaffected demonstrated the disease haplotype.
Figure 3. Haplotype analysis. Recombinations observed among affected individuals established a minimal candidate interval of 22 cM, between markers D1S3470 and GATA124F08. Only affected individuals and spouses of affected individuals are presented, for clarity. Individual III:16 is unaffected but exhibits the affected haplotype (see text). Alleles in parentheses are inferred, and alleles surrounded by question marks have unknown phase.
In this study, we demonstrated linkage of familial MPGN typeIII to chromosome 1q in a family with an autosomal dominantform of the disease. The maximal LOD score obtained was 3.86at = 0.00 for microsatellite marker GATA135F02. Haplotype analysisrevealed D1S3470 and GATA124F08 as flanking markers, yieldinga 22-cM minimal candidate region.
MPGN type III has been noted for the insidious nature of thecondition, with up to 65% of cases being diagnosed after chancediscovery of hematuria and/or proteinuria (17), as well as thewide range of ages at onset. In fact, the disease did not presentin two family members until they were >50 yr of age, andfour individuals were diagnosed during the screening process.This variability highlights the difficulty of assessing penetrancevalues and affection status in MPGN type III. Inasmuch as datafor this family suggest an autosomal dominant inheritance, certainfamily members might exhibit nonpenetrance, possessing the characteristicgenotype but not the phenotype. Interestingly, one 48-yr-oldindividual exhibits the disease haplotype but was classifiedas unaffected on the basis of urinalysis results. This personmight be a presymptomatic carrier, or the disease might be nonpenetrantin this individual. The presence of this carrier might suggestthat our original estimate of 99.5% penetrance is too high.Eight of nine carriers (88%) of the haplotype at this locusare affected, suggesting that a lower or age-dependent penetrancemodel might be appropriate for MPGN.
The course of the disease is uncertain, but up to 50% of patientsare expected to develop end-stage renal disease by 10 yr afterpresentation (2). A comparison with MPGN type I has demonstratedthat type III disease is more likely to exhibit deteriorationin renal function despite treatment with steroids, more likelyto demonstrate persisting urinary and complement abnormalities,and more likely to relapse. Nephrotic syndrome at presentationis also a poor prognostic indicator (18).
The pathogenesis of MPGN type III is poorly understood. Secondaryforms of MPGN types I and II have been associated with infections,connective tissue disease, and neoplastic conditions (19). However,secondary forms of MPGN type III are not observed. Complementperturbation is usually noted for sporadic cases of the conditionand is thought to be related to a slow-acting nephritic factor,which stabilizes a properdin-dependent C3-convertase (20). Thedeposits observed in renal biopsies seem to be temporally relatedto C3-convertase activity (21). Interestingly, the area of linkagedescribed above encompasses the regulators of complement clusteron chromosome 1 (22). These genes code for a highly homologousgroup of soluble and membrane-associated proteins that regulateC3-convertase activity, including complement receptor-1 (CR-1),membrane cofactor protein, decay-accelerating factor, and factorH. Abnormalities in any of these proteins might cause excesscirculating C3b, thus mimicking the action of convertase stabilizationby a nephritic factor. West et al. (23) postulated that lowCR-1 levels might increase the severity of glomerular diseasein the presence of a nephritic factor, and glomerular CR-1 activityhas been demonstrated to be absent in areas of complement deposition(24). Decay-accelerating factor is upregulated in the mesangiumin renal disease and has been observed to be correlated withC3 deposition (25), which suggests that this factor might alsoplay a role in protecting the kidney against the products ofcomplement activation. Paramesangial subepithelial depositsare observed in MPGN types II and III and are thought to berelated to excess circulating C3b and its breakdown products.Factor H abnormalities are also associated with excess C3b andparamesangial deposits, although the associated nephritis isusually mild and hypocomplementemia is usually severe (7). FactorH abnormalities have been observed in a variety of renal diseases,including familial hemolytic uremic syndrome (26), collagenIII nephropathy (27), and atypical MPGN type II (28).
In summary, we have mapped a gene for MPGN to chromosome 1q3132.This represents the first genetic locus established for MPGNtype III and confirms a familial form of this disease.
Acknowledgments
We thank all family members for participating in this study.We thank the support staff of the Center for Human Genetics,Duke University Medical Center, for technical assistance. Grantsupport was provided in part by the Beaumont Foundation (toDr. Conlon) and in part by the National Kidney Foundation (toDr. Winn), with core support from the Duke University MedicalCenter Faculty Development Fund. To facilitate further workin this area, we have founded an International Collaborationto Investigate Genetic Forms of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis,based at Beaumont Hospital (Dublin, Ireland). We welcome collaborationwith other physicians who care for patients with sporadic orfamilial forms of MPGN type I, II, or III. Please address correspondenceto Dr. P. J. Conlon, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland (E-mail:peter.conlon@beaumont.ie).
Neary J, Dorman A, Campbell E, Keogan M, Conlon P: Familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, in press
Mathieson PW: Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. In: The Treatment of Glomerulonephritis, edited by Pusey CD, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp 8192
Glassock RJ: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Treatment of Primary Glomerulonephritis, 1st Ed., edited by Ponticelli C, Glassock RJ, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp 218234
Morales JM, Martinez MA, Munoz DB, Munoz MA, Gota R, Usera G: Recurrent type III membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 63: 11861188, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
Silva FG: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Hepinstalls Pathology of the Kidney, 4th Ed., Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1992, pp 477559
Strife CF, McEnery PT, McAdams AJ, West CD: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with disruption of the glomerular basement membrane. Clin Nephrol 7: 6572, 1977[Medline]
West CD, McAdams AJ: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III: Association of glomerular deposits with circulating nephritic factor-stabilized convertase. Am J Kidney Dis 32: 5663, 1998[Medline]
Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL, Howell DN, Slotterbeck BD, Smith AH, Graham FL, Bembe ML, Quarles LD, Pericak-Vance MA, Vance JM: Linkage of a gene causing familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis to chromosome 11 and further evidence of genetic heterogeneity. Genomics 58: 113120, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, Ruotsalainen V, Morita T, Nissinen M, Herva R, Kashtan CE, Peltonen L, Holmberg C, Olsen A, Tryggvason K: Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein-nephrin-is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1: 575582, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Vance JM, Ben Othmane K: Methods of genotyping. In: Approaches to Gene Mapping in Complex Human Diseases, edited by Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1998, pp 215226
Haynes C, Speer MC, Peedin M, Roses AD, Haines JL, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA: PEDIGENE: A comprehensive data management system to facilitate efficient and rapid disease gene mapping [Abstract]. Am J Hum Genet 57: A193, 1995
OConnell JR, Weeks DE: The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set-recoding and fuzzy inheritance. Nat Genet 11: 402408, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, 3rd Ed., Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999, pp 6869
Ploughman LM, Boehnke M: Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study for a complex genetic trait. Am J Hum Genet 44: 543551, 1989[Medline]
Pericak-Vance MA: Analysis of genetic linkage data for mendelian traits. In: Current Protocols in Human Genetics, edited by Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Kork BR, Moir DT, Morton CC, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Smith DR, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1997, pp 1.4.11.4.30
Weeks DE, Sobel E, OConnell JR, Lange K: Computer programs for multilocus haplotyping of general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 56: 15061507, 1995[Medline]
Jackson EC, McAdams AJ, Strife CF, Forristal J, Welch TR, West CD: Differences between membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis types I and III in clinical presentation, glomerular morphology, and complement perturbation. Am J Kidney Dis 9: 115120, 1987[Medline]
Braun MC, West CD, Strife CF: Differences between membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis types I and III in long-term response to an alternate-day prednisone regimen. Am J Kidney Dis 34: 10221032, 1999[Medline]
Rennke HG: Secondary membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 47: 643656, 1995[Medline]
Clardy CW, Forristal J, Strife CF, West CD: A properdin dependent nephritic factor slowly activating C3, C5, and C9 in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, types I and III. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 50: 333347, 1989[CrossRef][Medline]
West CD: Nephritic factors predispose to chronic glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 24: 956963, 1994[Medline]
Nangaku M: Complement regulatory proteins in glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 54: 14191428, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
West CD, Witte DP, McAdams AJ: Composition of nephritic factor-generated glomerular deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 2. Am J Kidney Dis 37: 11201130, 2001[Medline]
Iversen BM, Vedeler CA, Matre R, Svarstad E: CR1 activity on erythrocytes and renal glomeruli in patients with renal disorders. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8: 12111214, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Cosio FG, Sedmak DD, Mahan JD, Nahman NS Jr: Localization of decay accelerating factor in normal and diseased kidneys. Kidney Int 36: 100107, 1989[Medline]
Warwicker P, Donne RL, Goodship JA, Goodship TH, Howie AJ, Kumararatne DS, Thompson RA, Taylor CM: Familial relapsing haemolytic uraemic syndrome and complement factor H deficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14: 12291233, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vogt BA, Wyatt RJ, Burke BA, Simonton SC, Kashtan CE: Inherited factor H deficiency and collagen type III glomerulopathy. Pediatr Nephrol 9: 1115, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
Levy M, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Gubler MC, Kohout G, Bensenouci A, Niaudet P, Hauptmann G, Lesavre P: H deficiency in two brothers with atypical dense intramembranous deposit disease. Kidney Int 30: 949956, 1986[Medline]
Received for publication February 12, 2002.
Accepted for publication April 24, 2002.
This article has been cited by other articles:
R. Klein, M. D. Knudtson, K. E. Lee, and B. E. K. Klein Serum Cystatin C Level, Kidney Disease Markers, and Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Arch Ophthalmol,
February 1, 2009;
127(2):
193 - 199.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
D. C. Ferrara, J. E. Merriam, K. B. Freund, R. F. Spaide, B. S. Takahashi, I. Zhitomirsky, H. F. Fine, L. A. Yannuzzi, and R. Allikmets Analysis of Major Alleles Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients With Multifocal Choroiditis: Strong Association With Complement Factor H
Arch Ophthalmol,
November 1, 2008;
126(11):
1562 - 1566.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. L. Thompson, B. E.K. Klein, R. Klein, Z. Xu, J. Capriotti, T. Joshi, D. Leontiev, K. E. Lee, R. C. Elston, and S. K. Iyengar Complement factor H and hemicentin-1 in age-related macular degeneration and renal phenotypes
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
September 1, 2007;
16(17):
2135 - 2148.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
D. Bok Evidence for an inflammatory process in age-related macular degeneration gains new support
PNAS,
May 17, 2005;
102(20):
7053 - 7054.
[Full Text][PDF]
G. S. Hageman, D. H. Anderson, L. V. Johnson, L. S. Hancox, A. J. Taiber, L. I. Hardisty, J. L. Hageman, H. A. Stockman, J. D. Borchardt, K. M. Gehrs, et al. From The Cover: A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration
PNAS,
May 17, 2005;
102(20):
7227 - 7232.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]