Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neary, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neary, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. P.
J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2052-2057, 2002
© 2002 American Society of Nephrology

Linkage of a Gene Causing Familial Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type III to Chromosome 1

John J. Neary*, Peter J. Conlon*, David Croke{dagger}, Anthony Dorman{dagger}, Mary Keogan{dagger}, Feng Yu Zhang§, Jeffery M. Vance§, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance§, William K. Scott§ and Michelle P. Winn§

Departments of *Nephrology and {ddagger}Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; {dagger}Department of Biochemistry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; and §Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Correspondence to Dr. Michelle P. Winn, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2903, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: 919-660-0038; Fax: 919-681-7894; E-mail: mwinn{at}chg.mc.duke.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) type III is a chronic progressive renal disease of unknown cause. The diagnosis is based on renal pathologic features (specifically immunofluorescence staining patterns and ultrastructural appearance). Mesangial cell proliferation and subendothelial and subepithelial deposits characterize the renal disease. Although the actual prevalence of this disease is not known, the disease is rare and usually sporadic. The clinical features of MPGN include the nephrotic syndrome and hematuria, with renal dysfunction occurring in approximately 50% of patients. Progression to end-stage renal disease is variable, and some patients exhibit stabilization or even improvement. Here is presented an Irish family in which there are eight affected members in four generations, suggesting autosomal dominant inheritance. This is the only reported family with an inherited form of MPGN type III. To evaluate the disease in this family, a genome-wide scan was performed with a panel of 402 polymorphic microsatellite markers, defining a grid with an average resolution of 10 cM (centimorgans). Significant evidence for linkage was observed on chromosome 1q31–32, with a maximal logarithm of the odds score of 3.86 at {theta} = 0.00 for microsatellite marker GATA135F02. Recombination events among affected individuals, as detected by haplotype analysis, established a 22-cM minimal candidate region flanked by markers D1S3470 and GATA124F08. The data provide evidence for a gene for familial MPGN on chromosome 1q.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is a chronic progressive renal disease that is diagnosed on the basis of renal pathologic features. MPGN is subdivided into types I, II, and III on the basis of histologic, immunofluorescence staining, and complement profile differences. All types are characterized by mesangial cell proliferation and capillary wall thickening. Type I is distinguished by subendothelial immune complex deposition and activation of the classic pathway of complement activation. Type II is distinguished by dense deposits within the glomerular basement membrane and type III by deposits in the subepithelial and subendothelial areas. Both types II and III demonstrate activation of the alternative complement pathway. Familial forms of MPGN types I and II have been described, with autosomal dominant and recessive modes of inheritance. To date, this is the only reported family with inherited type III disease; most reported cases are sporadic, with no known family history of MPGN (1).

The epidemiologic features of MPGN type III are poorly understood. However, it is known to be a rare form of glomerulonephritis, accounting for <1% of glomerulonephritis diagnoses in registry data (2). It typically presents with hematuria at an early age, and it progresses to end-stage renal disease by 10 yr after presentation in approximately 50% of cases. Treatment of the condition with steroids and anticoagulants yields variable results (3). Recurrence after transplantation is rare (1,4). Histologic assessments reveal mesangial proliferation and capillary wall thickening resulting from mesangial cell interposition. Electron microscopy reveals subendothelial, mesangial, and subepithelial deposits (5); glomerular basement membrane lamellation has also been described (6). The pathogenesis of the condition is unknown, although West and McAdams (7) proposed that the condition might be the result of perturbation of complement by a slow-acting nephritic factor.

The family described here is unique. There are eight affected members in three generations and male-to-male transmission, suggesting autosomal dominant transmission. In recent years, a number of forms of glomerulonephritis, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (8) and congenital nephrotic syndrome (9), have been recognized as having genetic origins. An understanding of the pathogenesis of the hereditary forms of these diseases might lead to a better understanding of how the more common sporadic forms develop.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Family Studies
Ethics committee approval was obtained from Beaumont Hospital (Dublin, Ireland) and Duke University Medical Center. Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants before the start of the study. Evaluation of each individual included the recording of a comprehensive medical history, BP measurements, urinalysis, analysis of a 24-h urine sample for protein levels, and measurement of serum albumin levels, if possible. Because complement is sometimes activated in the sporadic form of this disease, complement studies (C3 and C4) were performed for all available family members considered to be affected or of unknown status. To reduce the possibility of phenocopies, all affected individuals were tested for hepatitis B and hepatitis C and were screened for systemic lupus erythematosus with anti-nuclear antibody. Blood samples were also obtained for DNA extraction. Family members were considered to be affected if they had renal biopsy-proven MPGN type III (in the absence of any causes of secondary disease), were undergoing dialysis, had undergone renal transplantation, or exhibited >=3+ proteinuria and/or >=3+ hematuria in qualitative urinalyses (or >=300 mg protein/24 h) on two occasions. Individuals were categorized as being of unknown status if they exhibited urinary abnormalities less than those defined above and were categorized as being unaffected if they exhibited no detectable urinary abnormalities in qualitative urinalyses or were unrelated married-in spouses.

DNA Isolation and Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood by using a phenol/ethanol extraction protocol. Fluorescence genotyping was performed as described previously (10), with 143 prelabeled multiplex primer sets, comprising 402 microsatellite markers and providing an average grid of 10 cM across the genome. A Hitachi FMBIOII Multiview fluorescent image scanner (MiraiBio Inc., Alameda, CA) was used for detection; BioImage software (RMLuton Inc., Jackson, MI) was used to analyze images, and data were entered into the PEDIGENE database management system (11).

Analyses
Two-point and multipoint logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores were calculated by using the VITESSE statistical program (12). Two autosomal dominant models were analyzed, i.e., (1) a "full pedigree" model, with 99.5% penetrance and a 0.5% phenocopy rate, and (2) an "affecteds-only" model, in which only affected individuals contributed to the LOD score; information from other pedigree members was used only to establish linkage phase. For each model, a disease allele frequency of 0.001 was assumed. Significant evidence in favor of linkage was declared when the LOD values at any recombination were >=3. One-unit support intervals for the maximal-likelihood estimate of {theta} were calculated from two-point LOD scores by means of the one-unit-down method (13). Marker allele frequencies were calculated by using 100 chromosomes from unrelated Caucasian subjects (http://www.chg.mc.duke.edu/index.html). Map distances for the marker loci were obtained from published data (http://research.marshfieldclinic.org/genetics/). The maximal attainable LOD scores for the pedigree, using the full pedigree and affecteds-only models, were calculated via computer simulation with the SIMLINK 4.1 program (14). With the assumption of a four-allele system with frequencies of 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1, simulations used a marker heterozygosity of 0.7 and 5% recombination with the disease locus. Haplotype analysis was performed as described previously (15), to identify critical recombination events. The analysis was performed via visual inspection and was confirmed by using SIMWALK software (16). A candidate interval was considered excluded when two affected individuals within the pedigree inherited different haplotypes.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Family Data
Family data have been described previously (1) and are presented in Figure 1. Briefly, this is a four-generation, 51-member kindred from southern Ireland. A total of 39 blood samples were obtained for DNA extraction, including samples from eight affected, three unknown, and 28 unaffected individuals. Individuals who were not available for examination were considered to be of unknown status. Brief clinical descriptions are provided in Table 1. The mean age at the time of diagnosis of renal disease was 27.3 yr (range, 4 to 51 yr). Five of the eight affected individuals had biopsy-proven MPGN type III. For individual III:5, MPGN (without subclassification) had been diagnosed via light microscopy 25 yr earlier; electron microscopic evaluation was not performed. There was no evidence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or systemic lupus erythematosus for any of the affected individuals. Two of the affected individuals received renal transplants. One affected individual developed recurrence of the disease in the allograft and subsequently underwent a second transplant. Screening of the family revealed one new case, which was subsequently confirmed via renal biopsy, and two additional family members who were probably affected. Hypocomplementemia was observed only transiently in the index case at the time of presentation and was not noted for other family members who underwent complement studies.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Autosomal dominant family with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III. The family is a four-generation, 51-member kindred from southern Ireland. Ages (in years) are indicated below the generation:individual numbers. Genders have been concealed for privacy. There was male-to-male transmission of the disease.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinical details for affected individualsa
 
Linkage Analysis
Power calculations established that the maximal attainable LOD score for the full pedigree model was 6.50, with a mean LOD score of 4.10. Simulation results for the affecteds-only model indicated a maximal LOD score of 2.66 and a mean maximal LOD score of 1.63. A genome-wide screen analysis yielded evidence for linkage to chromosome 1. The maximal LOD score obtained with the full pedigree model was 3.86, at marker GATA135F02 (Table 2). Supporting evidence for linkage was obtained at two adjacent markers, i.e., D1S2625 (LOD = 1.68) and D1S1660 (LOD = 2.57). Results obtained with the affecteds-only model included a maximal LOD score of 2.09 at GATA135F02, with adjacent markers D1S2625 and D1S1660 demonstrating LOD scores of 1.59 and 1.22, respectively. Full pedigree multipoint analysis of markers D1S2625, GATA135F02, and D1S1660 produced a maximal LOD score of 3.91 at marker D1S1660 (data not shown). The maximal multipoint LOD score for the affecteds-only model was 2.10 at marker GATA135F02. No other regions of the genome contained LOD scores of >2.0 (Figure 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Full-pedigree two-point LOD score analysisa
 


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Two-point logarithm of the odds (LOD) score histogram. A histogram of all positive two-point LOD scores was generated for the entire genome. No LOD scores were >2.00 except in the region of linkage on chromosome 1.

 
To further define the minimal candidate region, haplotypes were constructed by using nine microsatellite markers, spanning the region from 202 cM to 240 cM on chromosome 1 (Figure 3). The recombinations observed among affected individuals established a minimal candidate interval of 22 cM, between markers D1S3470 and GATA124F08. It is noteworthy that one individual classified as unaffected demonstrated the disease haplotype.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Haplotype analysis. Recombinations observed among affected individuals established a minimal candidate interval of 22 cM, between markers D1S3470 and GATA124F08. Only affected individuals and spouses of affected individuals are presented, for clarity. Individual III:16 is unaffected but exhibits the affected haplotype (see text). Alleles in parentheses are inferred, and alleles surrounded by question marks have unknown phase.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we demonstrated linkage of familial MPGN type III to chromosome 1q in a family with an autosomal dominant form of the disease. The maximal LOD score obtained was 3.86 at {theta} = 0.00 for microsatellite marker GATA135F02. Haplotype analysis revealed D1S3470 and GATA124F08 as flanking markers, yielding a 22-cM minimal candidate region.

MPGN type III has been noted for the insidious nature of the condition, with up to 65% of cases being diagnosed after chance discovery of hematuria and/or proteinuria (17), as well as the wide range of ages at onset. In fact, the disease did not present in two family members until they were >50 yr of age, and four individuals were diagnosed during the screening process. This variability highlights the difficulty of assessing penetrance values and affection status in MPGN type III. Inasmuch as data for this family suggest an autosomal dominant inheritance, certain family members might exhibit nonpenetrance, possessing the characteristic genotype but not the phenotype. Interestingly, one 48-yr-old individual exhibits the disease haplotype but was classified as unaffected on the basis of urinalysis results. This person might be a presymptomatic carrier, or the disease might be nonpenetrant in this individual. The presence of this carrier might suggest that our original estimate of 99.5% penetrance is too high. Eight of nine carriers (88%) of the haplotype at this locus are affected, suggesting that a lower or age-dependent penetrance model might be appropriate for MPGN.

The course of the disease is uncertain, but up to 50% of patients are expected to develop end-stage renal disease by 10 yr after presentation (2). A comparison with MPGN type I has demonstrated that type III disease is more likely to exhibit deterioration in renal function despite treatment with steroids, more likely to demonstrate persisting urinary and complement abnormalities, and more likely to relapse. Nephrotic syndrome at presentation is also a poor prognostic indicator (18).

The pathogenesis of MPGN type III is poorly understood. Secondary forms of MPGN types I and II have been associated with infections, connective tissue disease, and neoplastic conditions (19). However, secondary forms of MPGN type III are not observed. Complement perturbation is usually noted for sporadic cases of the condition and is thought to be related to a slow-acting nephritic factor, which stabilizes a properdin-dependent C3-convertase (20). The deposits observed in renal biopsies seem to be temporally related to C3-convertase activity (21). Interestingly, the area of linkage described above encompasses the regulators of complement cluster on chromosome 1 (22). These genes code for a highly homologous group of soluble and membrane-associated proteins that regulate C3-convertase activity, including complement receptor-1 (CR-1), membrane cofactor protein, decay-accelerating factor, and factor H. Abnormalities in any of these proteins might cause excess circulating C3b, thus mimicking the action of convertase stabilization by a nephritic factor. West et al. (23) postulated that low CR-1 levels might increase the severity of glomerular disease in the presence of a nephritic factor, and glomerular CR-1 activity has been demonstrated to be absent in areas of complement deposition (24). Decay-accelerating factor is upregulated in the mesangium in renal disease and has been observed to be correlated with C3 deposition (25), which suggests that this factor might also play a role in protecting the kidney against the products of complement activation. Paramesangial subepithelial deposits are observed in MPGN types II and III and are thought to be related to excess circulating C3b and its breakdown products. Factor H abnormalities are also associated with excess C3b and paramesangial deposits, although the associated nephritis is usually mild and hypocomplementemia is usually severe (7). Factor H abnormalities have been observed in a variety of renal diseases, including familial hemolytic uremic syndrome (26), collagen III nephropathy (27), and atypical MPGN type II (28).

In summary, we have mapped a gene for MPGN to chromosome 1q31–32. This represents the first genetic locus established for MPGN type III and confirms a familial form of this disease.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank all family members for participating in this study. We thank the support staff of the Center for Human Genetics, Duke University Medical Center, for technical assistance. Grant support was provided in part by the Beaumont Foundation (to Dr. Conlon) and in part by the National Kidney Foundation (to Dr. Winn), with core support from the Duke University Medical Center Faculty Development Fund. To facilitate further work in this area, we have founded an International Collaboration to Investigate Genetic Forms of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, based at Beaumont Hospital (Dublin, Ireland). We welcome collaboration with other physicians who care for patients with sporadic or familial forms of MPGN type I, II, or III. Please address correspondence to Dr. P. J. Conlon, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland (E-mail: peter.conlon@beaumont.ie).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Neary J, Dorman A, Campbell E, Keogan M, Conlon P: Familial membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, in press
  2. Mathieson PW: Mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. In: The Treatment of Glomerulonephritis, edited by Pusey CD, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp 81–92
  3. Glassock RJ: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Treatment of Primary Glomerulonephritis, 1st Ed., edited by Ponticelli C, Glassock RJ, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp 218–234
  4. Morales JM, Martinez MA, Munoz DB, Munoz MA, Gota R, Usera G: Recurrent type III membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 63: 1186–1188, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Silva FG: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Hepinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney, 4th Ed., Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 1992, pp 477–559
  6. Strife CF, McEnery PT, McAdams AJ, West CD: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with disruption of the glomerular basement membrane. Clin Nephrol 7: 65–72, 1977[Medline]
  7. West CD, McAdams AJ: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type III: Association of glomerular deposits with circulating nephritic factor-stabilized convertase. Am J Kidney Dis 32: 56–63, 1998[Medline]
  8. Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL, Howell DN, Slotterbeck BD, Smith AH, Graham FL, Bembe ML, Quarles LD, Pericak-Vance MA, Vance JM: Linkage of a gene causing familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis to chromosome 11 and further evidence of genetic heterogeneity. Genomics 58: 113–120, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, Ruotsalainen V, Morita T, Nissinen M, Herva R, Kashtan CE, Peltonen L, Holmberg C, Olsen A, Tryggvason K: Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein-nephrin-is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1: 575–582, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Vance JM, Ben Othmane K: Methods of genotyping. In: Approaches to Gene Mapping in Complex Human Diseases, edited by Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1998, pp 215–226
  11. Haynes C, Speer MC, Peedin M, Roses AD, Haines JL, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA: PEDIGENE: A comprehensive data management system to facilitate efficient and rapid disease gene mapping [Abstract]. Am J Hum Genet 57: A193, 1995
  12. O’Connell JR, Weeks DE: The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set-recoding and fuzzy inheritance. Nat Genet 11: 402–408, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, 3rd Ed., Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999, pp 68–69
  14. Ploughman LM, Boehnke M: Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study for a complex genetic trait. Am J Hum Genet 44: 543–551, 1989[Medline]
  15. Pericak-Vance MA: Analysis of genetic linkage data for mendelian traits. In: Current Protocols in Human Genetics, edited by Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Kork BR, Moir DT, Morton CC, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Smith DR, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1997, pp 1.4.1–1.4.30
  16. Weeks DE, Sobel E, O’Connell JR, Lange K: Computer programs for multilocus haplotyping of general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 56: 1506–1507, 1995[Medline]
  17. Jackson EC, McAdams AJ, Strife CF, Forristal J, Welch TR, West CD: Differences between membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis types I and III in clinical presentation, glomerular morphology, and complement perturbation. Am J Kidney Dis 9: 115–120, 1987[Medline]
  18. Braun MC, West CD, Strife CF: Differences between membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis types I and III in long-term response to an alternate-day prednisone regimen. Am J Kidney Dis 34: 1022–1032, 1999[Medline]
  19. Rennke HG: Secondary membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 47: 643–656, 1995[Medline]
  20. Clardy CW, Forristal J, Strife CF, West CD: A properdin dependent nephritic factor slowly activating C3, C5, and C9 in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, types I and III. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 50: 333–347, 1989[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. West CD: Nephritic factors predispose to chronic glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 24: 956–963, 1994[Medline]
  22. Nangaku M: Complement regulatory proteins in glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 54: 1419–1428, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. West CD, Witte DP, McAdams AJ: Composition of nephritic factor-generated glomerular deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 2. Am J Kidney Dis 37: 1120–1130, 2001[Medline]
  24. Iversen BM, Vedeler CA, Matre R, Svarstad E: CR1 activity on erythrocytes and renal glomeruli in patients with renal disorders. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8: 1211–1214, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cosio FG, Sedmak DD, Mahan JD, Nahman NS Jr: Localization of decay accelerating factor in normal and diseased kidneys. Kidney Int 36: 100–107, 1989[Medline]
  26. Warwicker P, Donne RL, Goodship JA, Goodship TH, Howie AJ, Kumararatne DS, Thompson RA, Taylor CM: Familial relapsing haemolytic uraemic syndrome and complement factor H deficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14: 1229–1233, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Vogt BA, Wyatt RJ, Burke BA, Simonton SC, Kashtan CE: Inherited factor H deficiency and collagen type III glomerulopathy. Pediatr Nephrol 9: 11–15, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Levy M, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Gubler MC, Kohout G, Bensenouci A, Niaudet P, Hauptmann G, Lesavre P: H deficiency in two brothers with atypical dense intramembranous deposit disease. Kidney Int 30: 949–956, 1986[Medline]
Received for publication February 12, 2002. Accepted for publication April 24, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. Klein, M. D. Knudtson, K. E. Lee, and B. E. K. Klein
Serum Cystatin C Level, Kidney Disease Markers, and Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2009; 127(2): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. C. Ferrara, J. E. Merriam, K. B. Freund, R. F. Spaide, B. S. Takahashi, I. Zhitomirsky, H. F. Fine, L. A. Yannuzzi, and R. Allikmets
Analysis of Major Alleles Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients With Multifocal Choroiditis: Strong Association With Complement Factor H
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2008; 126(11): 1562 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. L. Thompson, B. E.K. Klein, R. Klein, Z. Xu, J. Capriotti, T. Joshi, D. Leontiev, K. E. Lee, R. C. Elston, and S. K. Iyengar
Complement factor H and hemicentin-1 in age-related macular degeneration and renal phenotypes
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2007; 16(17): 2135 - 2148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Bok
Evidence for an inflammatory process in age-related macular degeneration gains new support
PNAS, May 17, 2005; 102(20): 7053 - 7054.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. S. Hageman, D. H. Anderson, L. V. Johnson, L. S. Hancox, A. J. Taiber, L. I. Hardisty, J. L. Hageman, H. A. Stockman, J. D. Borchardt, K. M. Gehrs, et al.
From The Cover: A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration
PNAS, May 17, 2005; 102(20): 7227 - 7232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neary, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neary, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. P.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP