Membrane Expression of Proteinase 3 Is Genetically Determined
Adrian Schreiber,
Andreas Busjahn,
Friedrich C. Luft and
Ralph Kettritz
HELIOS Klinikum-Berlin, Franz Volhard Clinic and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr. Ralph Kettritz, Division of Nephrology, Franz Volhard Clinic, Wiltbergstrasse 50, 13122 Berlin, FRG. Phone: 49-30-9417-2202; Fax: 49-30-9417-2206;
ABSTRACT. Isolated human neutrophils exhibit a bimodal membraneproteinase 3 (PR3) expression. PR3 is the main target antigenin Wegener granulomatosis (WG). Cells with low expression canbe easily distinguished from cell subsets with high expression.In a recent study, a large neutrophil subset expressing membranePR3 (mPR3+) was a risk factor for systemic ANCA-associated vasculitis.PR3 membrane expression patterns are quite stable in a givenindividual, raising the possibility of genetic variance. Theaims of this study were: (1) to investigate the associationof mPR3 expression and the risk of WG in an independent Germancohort; (2) to test the hypothesis that mPR3 expression on neutrophilsis genetically influenced; and (3) to investigate whether ornot mPR3 expression is a function of intracellular PR3 content.mPR3 expression was assessed by FACS analysis in isolated humanneutrophils. Neutrophil mPR3 expression was studied in 35 patientswith WG, 15 patients with other inflammatory diseases, 125 healthyvolunteers, and 27 (15 monozygotic and 12 dizygotic) pairs oftwins. The intracellular PR3 content was assessed by intracellularflow cytometry and by Western blotting after separating mPR3low and high expressing cells by FACSort. FACS analysis in asubset of 16 healthy subjects showed a highly conserved PR3phenotype in two independent investigations >12 mo apart(r = 0.937). Patients with WG demonstrated a significantly higherpercentage of mPR3+ neutrophils than healthy controls and patientswith other inflammatory diseases. The mPR3+ percentage was highlycorrelated in MZ twins (r = 0.99) compared with DZ twins (r= 0.06). The intracellular PR3 content was not different inpersons with low or high mPR3 expression, nor was the PR3 contentdifferent in cells with low or high mPR3 expression within agiven individual. These data indicate that WG patients havea higher percentage of mPR3-expressing neutrophils. Furthermore,mPR3 expression is influenced by genetic variance. Finally,mPR3 expression is independent of intracellular PR3 content.E-mail kettritz@fvk-berlin.de
Wegener granulomatosis (WG) is a small vessel vasculitis characterizedby antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) (1). The mainANCA target antigen in WG is proteinase 3 (PR3), a neutrophiland monocyte-derived neutral serine protease (2). Proteinase3 is located in the azurophilic granules and in the secretoryvesicles of neutrophils (3). However, some PR3 is present onthe outer cell membrane of resting neutrophils (3). When neutrophilsare treated with subactivating concentrations of tumor necrosisfactor- (TNF-), neutrophil "priming" results in the translocationof intracellular PR3 to the cell surface, increasing the amountof antigen that is accessible to circulating antibodies. ANCAare possibly involved in the pathogenesis of vasculitis by bindingto membrane PR3 (mPR3), triggering reactive oxygen species (ROS)production, degranulation, and upregulation of surface adhesionmolecules (410). Several studies suggested that higheramounts of mPR3 expression correlate with disease activity.On the other hand, mPR3 expression is bimodal with the existenceof two distinct neutrophil subsets, even within healthy subjects.One cell subset is characterized by low mPR3 expression (mPR3-)and the other subset by high mPR3 expression (mPR3+). The proportionof these two subsets seems to be very stable in a given individual.However, there is great inter-individual variability rangingfrom 0 to 100% mPR3+ on the neutrophil surface. In a recentstudy, a high percentage of mPR3+ cells was a risk factor forsystemic vasculitis (11). Furthermore, a higher percentage ofmPR3+ cells was found to be a risk factor for disease relapse(12). From observations in two families, it was speculated thatmPR3 is genetically influenced (11). We performed studies inWG patients, normal volunteers, inflammatory disease controls,and twin subjects to examine these issues further. We testedthe hypothesis that higher percentage of mPR3+ neutrophils isassociated with WG, that mPR3 expression is constant withingiven individuals, and that mPR3 expression is influenced bygenetic variance. We also had occasion to explore the relationshipbetween mPR3 expression and intracellular PR3 content.
Materials
Recombinant TNF- was obtained from Genzyme (Rüsselsheim,FRG). The polyclonal rabbit antibody to Proteinase 3 was a giftfrom Wieslab AB (Lund, Sweden), the monoclonal mouse antibodyto Proteinase 3 was obtained from CLB (Amsterdam, Netherland),horseradish peroxidase-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG was fromAmersham (Braunschweig, FRG), and FITC-conjugated F(ab)2-fragmentof goat anti-mouse IgG was from DAKO (Hamburg, FRG). Dextranwas purchased from Amersham Pharmacia (Amsterdam, Netherlands).Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS), phosphate-buffered saline(PBS), and trypan blue were from Seromed (Berlin, FRG). Endotoxin-freereagents and plastic disposables were used in all experiments.Histopaque 1083 and Saponin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich(Deisenhofen, FRG).
Isolation of Human Neutrophils
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils of healthy human volunteers wereisolated from heparinized whole blood by red blood cell sedimentationwith dextran 1%, followed by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradientcentrifugation and hypotonic lysis of erythrocytes for 15 susing sodium chloride solution. Neutrophils were centrifuged(10 min at 1050 rpm) and resuspended in HBSS with calcium andmagnesium (HBSS++). The cell viability was detected in everycell preparation by trypan blue exclusion and found to be greaterthan 99%. The percentage of neutrophils in the suspension was>95% by Wright-Giemsa staining and by light microscopy.
Assessment of ANCA-Antigen Expression by Flow Cytometry
FACS was used as described previously (7) to evaluate the PR3expression on neutrophils. Briefly, cells were stimulated with2 ng/ml TNF- or buffer control for 20 min at 37°C and spundown at 200 g for 7 min at 4°C. Pellets were resuspendedin 1 ml of ice-cold PBS/0.5% paraformaldehyde and stored onice for 20 min. Cells were pelleted again and resuspended inHBSS without Ca2+/Mg2+ before they were incubated with dilutionsof mab to PR3 or an isotype control followed by a secondaryFITC-conjugated F(ab)2 fragment of goat anti-mouse IgG. Flowcytometry was performed on the same day using a FACSort (BectonDickinson, Heidelberg, FRG), and 10,000 events per sample werecollected. Data are reported either as percentage of the totalneutrophil population that were mPR3+ or as mean fluorescenceintensity (MFI), reflecting the total amount of mPR3. For thelatter, the marker was set to include both mPR3- and the mPR3+cells.
Flow Cytometry of Intracellular PR3
Neutrophils were permeabilized as described previously (13).Briefly, 106 cells were pelleted (200 g; 5 min; 4°C) andresuspended in 250 µl of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cellswere stored on ice for 20 min, washed once in PBS plus 1% BSA(buffer A), and resuspended in 100 µl of permeabilizationbuffer containing PBS, 1% BSA, and 0.2% Saponin (buffer B).Monoclonal antibody to PR3, or an equal amount of mouse IgG1-negativecontrol (isotype control), or PBS only was added, and sampleswere kept for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed and incubatedwith FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 fragment of goat anti-mouse Ig(1:50). After washing, cells were resuspended in 500 µlof buffer A and stored on ice in the dark until analyzed usinga FACSort flow cytometer.
Subjects
We investigated the heritability of PR3 membrane expressionon neutrophils in 27 pairs of monozygotic (MZ = 15) and dizygotic(DZ = 12) healthy German twins. Twin pairs were recruited byadvertisement in public print media. All subjects underwenta medical history and physical examination before the study.Persons receiving medications were excluded from the study.Zygosity was determined by use of five microsatellite markerscoampliflied by PCR. In addition we investigated 125 healthy,35 patients with WG, and 15 patients with other inflammatorydiseases. Clinical and laboratory data describing patients withWG are listed in Table 1. The demographic data of the twin pairsare given in Table 2. Healthy controls included 75 female patientsand 50 male patients with a mean age of 41.4 ± 13.8 yr.The 15 patients of the inflammatory disease control group included4 women and 11 men with a mean age of 72.3 ± 8.1. Diagnoseswere sepsis for nine patients, pneumonia in five, and erysipelasin two. Leukocyte count was 19.3 ± 8.8 Gpt/L, and CRPlevels were 169.3 ± 105.5 mg/L. Written informed consentwas obtained before study entry as required by our institutionalreview board.
Separation of PR3+ and PR3- Neutrophils by Flow Cytometry Sorting
After staining (3 x 107) for PR3 as described, PR3+ and PR3-cells were separated by FACSort (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg,FRG). Cells were stained for membrane PR3 expression as described.After gating in the light-scatters cells were separated by gatingfor mPR3+ and mPR3- neutrophils. Cells were collected and countedafter centrifugation for 10 min at 300 x g with Trypan blue-lightmicroscopy.
Western Blot Analysis of Proteinase 3
Unseparated neutrophils before FACSorting, mPR3+ and mPR3- neutrophilsseparated by FACSort (5 x 104), and Jurkat cells were centrifugatedat 8000 rpm for 1 min at 4°C, and pellets were lysed with20 µl of ice-cold lysing buffer (20 mM Tris-Hcl, pH 8.0,containing 138 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate(EDTA), 10% glycerol, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF,10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 mM quercetin,5 mM Iodoacetamide). Samples were kept on ice for 5 min, supernatantwas recovered by centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C,and protein concentration was measured by BCA protein assay(Pierce, Munich, FRG). Loading buffer (250 mM Tris-HCL, pH 6.8,with 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue) was added,and samples were heated for 5 min at 95°C. Each sample containing5 µg of protein per lane was loaded on 15% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel, electrophoresed, and transferredto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in TBS-T+ nonfat dry milk 10% for 1 h and incubated overnight with anantibody to Proteinase 3 (gift from Wieslab AB, Lund, Sweden)(1:2000 dilution) in TBS-T + nonfat dry milk 1%. Membranes werewashed and incubated with a secondary Ab (horseradish peroxidase-labeleddonkey anti-rabbit IgG [1:5000]; Amersham, Amsterdam, Netherland).Blot was developed by incubation in a chemiluminescence substrate(ECL, Amersham) and exposed to a x-ray film. Equal loading ofprotein was confirmed by stripping and reprobing the blots fortotal p38 MAPK. Densitometry of the PR3 bands was performedwith scanned x-ray films and the NIH image program.
Statistical and Quantitative Genetics
Statistical analyses were conducted by use of the SPSS program.All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Relationship betweenparameters was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interindividualdifferences of mean group values were tested with unpaired ttest. A value for P < 0.05 was considered to be statisticallysignificant. Parameters of the quantitative genetic models wereestimated by structural equation modeling by use of the MX programdeveloped by Neale (14). Variability of any given phenotypewithin a population can be decomposed into genetic infuences(VaraddGen), environmental influences shared by the twins withinthe family (VarsharedEnv), and effects of random environment(Varenv), as follows:
Var = VaraddGen + VarsharedEnv + Varenv.
For MZ and DZ, the covariance of their phenotype is given by:
CovMZ = VaraddGen + VarsharedEnv;
CovDZ = 0.5 VaraddGen + VarsharedEnv.
Heritability analysis in twin studies can estimate additivecomponents of genetic variability as well as two environmentalinfluences. These values estimate the relative amount of theinfluence of the variable on interindividual differences upto a sum of 1. Genetic and environmental effects were estimatedby the best-fit model as selected by 2 value.
To test differences among patients with WG, disease controls,and healthy controls, we applied ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferronitesting.
mPR3 Expression in Normal Persons and WG Patients
First, we investigated the stability of the neutrophil PR3 expressionon the surface membrane over prolonged periods of time. We selected16 individuals with membrane PR3 expression ranging from 0 to100% and investigated the PR3 expression on two occasions witha time interval of at least 12 mo. Figure 1 indicates that themPR3 expression was reproducible and highly stable with a correlationfactor of 0.937.
Figure 1. Stability and reproducibility of membrane proteinase 3 (PR3) expression (mPR3) measured over prolonged time periods. Isolated neutrophils from 16 unrelated donors were stained for mPR3 and analyzed by FACS analysis. The percentage of mPR3 positivity at the first evaluation is shown on the x axis, withthe percentage at the second evaluation on the y axis. Percentage of mPR3+ was highly stable, with a correlation factor of R = 0.937.
In the 125 healthy control subjects, the PR3-membrane expressiondistribution percentage showed a normal bell-shaped curve. Incontrast, the mPR3+ expression distribution percentage in patientswith WG was significantly skewed to a higher mPR3+ phenotypeas shown in Figure 2A. The mean mPR3+ percentage was 56.1% inthe healthy cohort compared with 76.8% in the WG cohort (P <0.001) given in Figure 2B. These results indicate that the percentageof mPR3+ was highly conserved in any given individual over timeand that the percentage of mPR3+ was significantly higher inour German cohort of patients with WG compared with healthycontrols. In addition, we investigated the mPR3 expression ina cohort of 15 patients with other inflammatory diseases. Weobserved no difference in the percentage of the mPR3+ populationcompared with healthy controls (59.4% versus 56.1%). However,this number was significantly lower compared with 76.8% in patientswith WG (P < 0.05). When we assessed total amount of mPR3by measuring mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), we found a valueof 278 ± 206 for healthy controls, 457 ± 310 forpatients with WG, and 461 ± 257 for patients with idiopathicinflammation. MFI values in both WG and the disease controlwere significantly higher compared with healthy individuals(P < 0.05). We did not see a significant difference in thepercentage of PR3 positivity or in the MFI for the total amountof PR3 between WG patients with CRP-levels below versus above5 mg/L. However, when we compared patients with a BVAS belowversus above a score of 2, we observed a trend toward a highertotal amount of expressed membrane PR3 in patients with a BVAS>2 (360 MFI ± 270 for patients with a BVAS < 2versus 562 ± 315 for those with a BVAS > 2; P = 0.08),whereas the percentage of PR3 positivity was similar. Thesedata indicate that patients with WG are characterized by higherpercentages of PR3+ neutrophils compared with healthy controlsas well as with patients with other inflammatory diseases. Incontrast, the total amount of mPR3 may also be upregulated duringthe course of other inflammatory processes than WG.
Figure 2. (A) The distribution of mPR3+ in a cohort of 125 healthy German subjects compared with 35 patients with Wegener granulomatosis (WG). Isolated neutrophils were stained with a monoclonal antibody against PR3, a secondary FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Healthy individuals are shown as black bars, WG patients as black hatched bars. (B) The mean percentage of neutrophils expressing PR3 on their membrane is shown. The differences were highly significant (** P < 0.001).
PR3 Membrane Expression in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins
MZ and DZ twins were demographically similar (Table 2). We phenotyped15 MZ and 12 DZ twin pairs according to their membrane PR3 expression.The percentage of mPR3+ was significantly correlated in MZ twinpairs with a correlation factor of 0.99, as shown in Figure 3A.In contrast, no correlation in the percentage of PR3 expressionwas observed in the DZ twin pairs (Figure 3B). Here, the correlationfactor was 0.06. The heritability percentage of mPR3+ was estimatedas 99% (Table 3). In addition, we found that the absolute amountof PR3 that is expressed on the outer cell membrane, as assessedby the mean channel intensity, was also correlated in MZ twinswith a regression coefficient of 0.96 as shown in Figure 4A.In the DZ twins, shown in Figure 4B, no correlation was found.The heritability estimate for this parameter was 96.7%. Theseresults suggest a strong genetic effect on mPR3 expression.
Figure 3. The percentage of mPR3+ neutrophils was assessed in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. The percentage of mPR3+ of one twin (x axis) is plotted against the other twin (y axis) of the pair. (A) 15 pairs of MZ twins; the percentage of mPR3+ was highly correlated (R = 0.99). (B) 12 pairs of DZ pairs; No correlation was found (R = 0.06).
Table 3. Group mean values of percentage of membrane proteinase 3-positive PMN (Mean % PR3+) and mean channel fluoresence intensity (MFI) of membrane proteinase 3 (Mean MFI m PR3) on PMN for monozygotic and dizygotic twinsa
Figure 4. The mean PR3 expressed on the neutrophil plasma membrane measured as the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was compared between MZ and DZ twin pairs. The MFI of membrane PR3 of one twin (x axis) is plotted against the other twin (y axis). (A) 15 pairs of MZ twins; the mean membrane PR3 amount was highly correlated (R = 0.96). (B) Results from 12 pairs of DZ twin pairs; no correlation was found (R = -0.11).
Intracellular Proteinase 3 Content in Neutrophils
To investigate whether or not mPR3 expression is a functionof different intracellular PR3 concentrations, we assessed theintracellular PR3 content in neutrophils from individuals withapproximately 50% mPR3 expression by flow cytometry. PR3 stainingwas either performed in unpermeabilized cells or, to detectintacellular PR3, after detergent permeabilization. Figure 5shows that the typical bimodal type of mPR3 expression was notseen in cells after permeabilization. This observation suggeststhat the amount of mPR3 is not dependent on the intracellularcontent of PR3. Next, we performed Western blot analysis fortotal PR3, comparing neutrophils from donors with less than10% mPR3+ and more than 90% mPR3+. Figure 6 indicates no differencein the total amount of PR3 between the different donors. Finally,to exclude interindividual variations, we physically separatedmPR3+ and mPR3- neutrophils from five different donors by FACSort.Figure 7 shows that sorting based on mPR3 expression resultedin two populations with either less than 90% mPR3+ or more than90% mPR3+ neutrophils, respectively. Unseparated cells containing50% mPR3+ and 50% mPR3- cells, and cells after sorting wereanalyzed for total PR3 by Western blot analysis (Figure 8).When we used densitometry on scanned x-ray films to quantitatethe PR3 bands, we found no significant difference among unseparatedneutrophils, mPR3+, and mPR3- cells (respective OD values were68.9, 68.0, and 66.6).
Figure 5. (A) The mPR3 staining was compared with intracellular PR3 staining. A donor with approximately 50% mPR3+ neutrophils was stained for membrane PR3 (black graph). The isotype control (gray-hatched graph) showed no significant membrane staining. (B) Neutrophils from the same donor were permeabilized and stained for intracellular PR3 (black graph). With isotype control, no significant staining was observed (gray hatched graph). As shown after permeabilization, a homogeneous population staining for PR3 was observed, suggesting an equal intracellular content of PR3 in both subsets.
Figure 6. The PR3 content in neutrophils was compared by immunoblotting with a rabbit antibody against PR3 between donors with <10% mPR3+ neutrophils and donors with >90% mPR3+ neutrophils. Jurkat cells (J) that do not express PR3 served as negative control. The upper row shows staining for PR3. Membranes were stripped and restained for p38 MAPK to show equal protein loading (p38). No difference in intracellular PR3 amount was observed.
Figure 7. mPR3+ and mPR3- neutrophils from a single donor were separated by flow cytometry sorting. Before sorting, approximately 50% of neutrophils expressed PR3 on their plasma membrane (A). After sorting for mPR3+ neutrophils, a population with more then 90% mPR3+ neutrophils was identified (B). After sorting for mPR3- cells, a population of less then 10% mPR3+ neutrophils was identified (C).
Figure 8. PR3 content in separated neutrophils was assessed by Western blot analyses. Shown are the unseparated cells with approximately 50% mPR3+ cells (mix), the neutrophils sorted for mPR3- expression (-), and neutrophils sorted for mPR3+ expression (+). The first row shows staining for PR3. The second row shows the staining for p38 MAPK after stripping of membranes to show equal protein loading (p38). PR3 content in all three populations was similar.
We confirm in a second independent cohort of patients with WGthat a high percentage of mPR3 expressing neutrophils is a riskfactor for ANCA vasculitis. In addition, using the twin model,we provide solid genetic evidence that mPR3 expression is geneticallycontrolled. Furthermore, our experimental studies extend ourprevious knowledge by demonstrating that differences in themPR3 expression do not reflect different intracellular PR3 content.Our data demonstrate the influence of genetics in the occurrenceof systemic ANCA vasculitis and also underscore the importanceof mPR3 surface expression rather than total PR3 cell contentin terms of disease risk.
PR3 is the main autoantigen in WG (1517). PR3 is storedintracellularly in azurophilic and secretory vesicles (3). However,some PR3 can be detected on the cell membrane of isolated restingneutrophils. Neutrophil activation in vitro or during activevasculitis results in increased mPR3 expression (4,18). Recently,a bimodal expression pattern of mPR3 was shown. Two distinctpopulations of mPR3+ and mPR3- neutrophils were distinguishedin isolated neutrophils (19,20). The clinical relevance of thisfinding was demonstrated by the fact that a large percentageof mPR3+ on the cell surface is a risk factor for vasculitisand a risk factor for disease relapse in patients with WG (11,12).Our data confirm and extend these findings. Documentation ina second, independent cohort renders this association importantcredibility. Furthermore, the powerful twin model confirmedthe suggestion of genetic variance for PR3 membrane expressionbased on two families in the earlier study.
Several consequences of high membrane PR3 expression are conceivablein the setting of ANCA vasculitis. A higher mPR3 could possiblytrigger the generation of ANCA itself. A recent investigationdemonstrated that injection of apoptotic neutrophils into ratsresulted in ANCA production (21). Apoptotic neutrophils expresshigher levels of ANCA antigens (22,23). Furthermore, membranePR3 is enzymatically active and was shown to be partially resistantto the naturally occurring inhibitor alpha1-antitrypsin andelafin (24). Thus, a higher PR3 membrane expression could acceleratetissue lesions, including those found during vasculitic inflammation.Finally, it is conceivable that more mPR3 allows for more interactionwith PR3-ANCA. Increased ANCA binding could initiate more neutrophilactivation followed by endothelial cell injury (25,26). Furtherstudies will be necessary to address these issues.
We considered the possibility that the low and high mPR3-expressingneutrophil subsets may be a consequence of differences in intracellularPR3 amounts. We observed that the typical bimodal type of PR3membrane staining vanished after cells were permeabilized, allowingfor intracellular PR3 staining. In addition, the results ofWestern blot analyses in donors with membrane PR3 percentageof more than 90% and less than 10% showed no difference in PR3content. Both observations suggested that mPR3 expression wasnot a direct consequence of intracellular PR3 content. Afterseparating membrane PR3+ and PR3- neutrophils physically, wealso investigated this issue within individuals, as opposedto interindividual comparisons. Our data indicate that the intracellularamount of PR3 was similar in both subsets. These results clearlyshow that the two different subsets of membrane PR3+ and PR3-neutrophils are not a function of variances in the intracellularPR3 content.
We used a twin approach to test whether or not mPR3 expressionis genetically controlled. The twin approach allows detectionand quantification of genetic effects in relatively small subjectsgroups. MZ twins share all genes in common, whereas DZ twinsare related as siblings and share half their genes on average.The heritability of the percentage of mPR3+ cells was high;however, we are aware that twin studies overestimate geneticinfluences and interpret these findings only as showing a robustgenetic effect. For WG, several genetic factors involved inthe pathogenesis have been suggested. A defective PIZ-alleleof the PR3 inhibitor 1-antitrypsin was associated with WG (27,28).A common variant of the CD18 gene confers increased risk forANCA-associated vasculitis (29,30). In a recent work from Genciket al. (31), the authors found certain PR3 epitope variantsin 79 patients with WG. Furthermore, they identified polymorphismsin the promotor region of PR3 change transcription factor recognitionsites that may lead to altered transcriptional activity of thePR3 gene and possibly an increased expression of PR3 on theneutrophil surface. However, the investigators did not phenotypetheir subjects in terms of membrane PR3 expression so that thehypothesis remains to be tested.
To our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that the neutrophilPR3 membrane expression in neutrophils is genetically regulated.The specific gene loci and genes that are responsible for mPR3expression need now to be identified. We are studying largernumbers of DZ twins and have also recruited their parents. Withthis approach, we intend an identity-by-descent linkage analysisto find the gene loci that are responsible. This approach hasbeen successful in identifying cardiovascularly relevant genesby our group in earlier studies (32).
van der Woude FJ, Rasmussen N, Lobatto S, Wiik A, Permin H, van Es LA, van der Giessen M, van der Hem GK, The TH: Autoantibodies against neutrophils and monocytes: Tool for diagnosis and marker of disease activity in Wegeners granulomatosis. Lancet 1: 425429, 1985[Medline]
Labbaye C, Musette P, Cayre YE: Wegener autoantigen and myeloblastin are encoded by a single mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 92539256, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Witko-Sarsat V, Cramer EM, Hieblot C, Guichard J, Nusbaum P, Lopez S, Lesavre P, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L: Presence of proteinase 3 in secretory vesicles: Evidence of a novel, highly mobilizable intracellular pool distinct from azurophil granules. Blood 94: 24872496, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Falk RJ, Terrell RS, Charles LA, Jennette JC: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies induce neutrophils to degranulate and produce oxygen radicals in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 41154119, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Mulder AH, Heeringa P, Brouwer E, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG: Activation of granulocytes by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA): A Fc gamma RII-dependent process. Clin Exp Immunol 98: 270278, 1994[Medline]
Reumaux D, Vossebeld PJ, Roos D, Verhoeven AJ: Effect of tumor necrosis factor-induced integrin activation on Fc gamma receptor II-mediated signal transduction: Relevance for activation of neutrophils by anti-proteinase 3 or anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies. Blood 86: 31893195, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kettritz R, Jennette JC, Falk RJ: Crosslinking of ANCA-antigens stimulates superoxide release by human neutrophils. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 386394, 1997[Abstract]
Cockwell P, Brooks CJ, Adu D, Savage CO: Interleukin-8: A pathogenetic role in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 55: 852863, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
Grimminger F, Hattar K, Papavassilis C, Temmesfeld B, Csernok E, Gross WL, Seeger W, Sibelius U: Neutrophil activation by anti-proteinase 3 antibodies in Wegeners granulomatosis: Role of exogenous arachidonic acid and leukotriene B4 generation. J Exp Med 184: 15671572, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brooks CJ, King WJ, Radford DJ, Adu D, McGrath M, Savage CO: IL-1 beta production by human polymorphonuclear leucocytes stimulated by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: Relevance to systemic vasculitis. Clin Exp Immunol 106: 273279, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
Witko-Sarsat V, Lesavre P, Lopez S, Bessou G, Hieblot C, Prum B, Noel LH, Guillevin L, Ravaud P, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Timsit J, Grunfeld JP, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L: A large subset of neutrophils expressing membrane proteinase 3 is a risk factor for vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 12241233, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Rarok AA, Stegeman CA, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG: Neutrophil membrane expression of proteinase 3 (PR3) is related to relapse in PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 22322238, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kettritz R, Gaido ML, Haller H, Luft FC, Jennette CJ, Falk RJ: Interleukin-8 delays spontaneous and tumor necrosis factor-alpha- mediated apoptosis of human neutrophils. Kidney Int 53: 8491, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Neale M: Statistical Modeling. 4th edition, Richmond, VA, Department of Psychiatry, 1997
Ludemann J, Utecht B, Gross WL: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies in Wegeners granulomatosis recognize an elastinolytic enzyme. J Exp Med 171: 357362, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Niles JL, McCluskey RT, Ahmad MF, Arnaout MA: Wegeners granulomatosis autoantigen is a novel neutrophil serine proteinase. Blood 74: 18881893, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Goldschmeding R, van der Schoot CE, ten Bokkel Huinink D, Hack CE, van den Ende ME, Kallenberg CG, von dem Borne AE: Wegeners granulomatosis autoantibodies identify a novel diisopropylfluorophosphate-binding protein in the lysosomes of normal human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 84: 15771587, 1989[Medline]
Muller Kobold AC, Kallenberg CG, Tervaert JW: Leucocyte membrane expression of proteinase 3 correlates with disease activity in patients with Wegeners granulomatosis. Br J Rheumatol 37: 901907, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Bessou G, Lesavre P, Lopez S, Witko-Sarsat V: Bimodal distribution of proteinase 3 (PR3) surface expression reflects a constitutive heterogeneity in the polymorphonuclear neutrophil pool. FEBS Lett 374: 2933, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
Csernok E, Ludemann J, Gross WL, Bainton DF: Ultrastructural localization of proteinase 3, the target antigen of anti-cytoplasmic antibodies circulating in Wegeners granulomatosis. Am J Pathol 137: 11131120, 1990[Abstract]
Patry YC, Trewick DC, Gregoire M, Audrain MA, Moreau AM, Muller JY, Meflah K, Esnault VL: Rats injected with syngenic rat apoptotic neutrophils develop antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 17641768, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kettritz R, Scheumann J, Xu Y, Luft FC, Haller H: TNF-alphaaccelerated apoptosis abrogates ANCA-mediated neutrophil respiratory burst by a caspase-dependent mechanism. Kidney Int 61: 502515, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
Harper L, Cockwell P, Adu D, Savage CO: Neutrophil priming and apoptosis in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis. Kidney Int 59: 17291738, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
Campbell EJ, Campbell MA, Owen CA: Bioactive proteinase 3 on the cell surface of human neutrophils: Quantification, catalytic activity, and susceptibility to inhibition. J Immunol 165: 33663374, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ewert BH, Jennette JC, Falk RJ: Anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies stimulate neutrophils to damage human endothelial cells. Kidney Int 41: 375383, 1992[Medline]
Savage CO, Pottinger BE, Gaskin G, Pusey CD, Pearson JD: Autoantibodies developing to myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 in systemic vasculitis stimulate neutrophil cytotoxicity toward cultured endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 141: 335342, 1992[Abstract]
Esnault VL, Testa A, Audrain M, Roge C, Hamidou M, Barrier JH, Sesboue R, Martin JP, Lesavre P: Alpha 1-antitrypsin genetic polymorphism in ANCA-positive systemic vasculitis. Kidney Int 43: 13291332, 1993[Medline]
Segelmark M, Elzouki AN, Wieslander J, Eriksson S: The PiZ gene of alpha 1-antitrypsin as a determinant of outcome in PR3- ANCA-positive vasculitis. Kidney Int 48: 844850, 1995[Medline]
Gencik M, Meller S, Borgmann S, Sitter T, Menezes Saecker AM, Fricke H, Epplen JT: The association of CD18 alleles with anti-myeloperoxidase subtypes of ANCA-associated systemic vasculitides. Clin Immunol 94: 912, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Meller S, Jagiello P, Borgmann S, Fricke H, Epplen JT, Gencik M: Novel SNPs in the CD18 gene validate the association with MPO-ANCA+ vasculitis. Genes Immun 2: 269272, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
Gencik M, Meller S, Borgmann S, Fricke H: Proteinase 3 gene polymorphisms and Wegeners granulomatosis. Kidney Int 58: 24732477, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Luft FC: Twins in cardiovascular genetic research. Hypertension 37: 350356, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication May 23, 2002.
Accepted for publication September 3, 2002.
This article has been cited by other articles:
R. A.F. de Lind van Wijngaarden, L. van Rijn, E. C. Hagen, R. A. Watts, G. Gregorini, J. W. C. Tervaert, A. D. Mahr, J. L. Niles, E. de Heer, J. A. Bruijn, et al. Hypotheses on the Etiology of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody Associated Vasculitis: The Cause Is Hidden, but the Result Is Known
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2008;
3(1):
237 - 252.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
L. Vong, F. D'Acquisto, M. Pederzoli-Ribeil, L. Lavagno, R. J. Flower, V. Witko-Sarsat, and M. Perretti Annexin 1 Cleavage in Activated Neutrophils: A PIVOTAL ROLE FOR PROTEINASE 3
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 12, 2007;
282(41):
29998 - 30004.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. P van Rossum, M. G Huitema, C. A Stegeman, M. Bijl, K. de Leeuw, M. A Van Leeuwen, P. C Limburg, and C. G M Kallenberg Standardised assessment of membrane proteinase 3 expression. Analysis in ANCA-associated vasculitis and controls
Ann Rheum Dis,
October 1, 2007;
66(10):
1350 - 1355.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. von Vietinghoff, G. Tunnemann, C. Eulenberg, M. Wellner, M. Cristina Cardoso, F. C. Luft, and R. Kettritz NB1 mediates surface expression of the ANCA antigen proteinase 3 on human neutrophils
Blood,
May 15, 2007;
109(10):
4487 - 4493.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. Bauer, M. Abdgawad, L. Gunnarsson, M. Segelmark, H. Tapper, and T. Hellmark Proteinase 3 and CD177 are expressed on the plasma membrane of the same subset of neutrophils
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
February 1, 2007;
81(2):
458 - 464.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Schreiber, H. Xiao, R. J. Falk, and J. C. Jennette Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Are Sufficient and Necessary Targets to Mediate Glomerulonephritis and Vasculitis Induced by Anti-Myeloperoxidase Antibodies
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
December 1, 2006;
17(12):
3355 - 3364.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. von Vietinghoff, A. Busjahn, C. Schonemann, G. Massenkeil, B. Otto, F. C. Luft, and R. Kettritz Major Histocompatibility Complex HLA Region Largely Explains the Genetic Variance Exercised on Neutrophil Membrane Proteinase 3 Expression
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
November 1, 2006;
17(11):
3185 - 3191.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M. D. Morgan, L. Harper, J. Williams, and C. Savage Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasm-Associated Glomerulonephritis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2006;
17(5):
1224 - 1234.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. C. Jennette, H. Xiao, and R. J. Falk Pathogenesis of Vascular Inflammation by Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2006;
17(5):
1235 - 1242.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Schreiber, B. Otto, X. Ju, M. Zenke, U. Goebel, F. C. Luft, and R. Kettritz Membrane Proteinase 3 Expression in Patients with Wegener's Granulomatosis and in Human Hematopoietic Stem Cell-Derived Neutrophils
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
July 1, 2005;
16(7):
2216 - 2224.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. P. van Rossum, A. A. Rarok, M. G. Huitema, G. Fassina, P. C. Limburg, and C. G. M. Kallenberg Constitutive membrane expression of proteinase 3 (PR3) and neutrophil activation by anti-PR3 antibodies
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
December 1, 2004;
76(6):
1162 - 1170.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
H. Fujiwara, F. El Ouriaghli, M. Grube, D. A. Price, K. Rezvani, E. Gostick, G. Sconocchia, J. Melenhorst, N. Hensel, D. C. Douek, et al. Identification and in vitro expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific for human neutrophil elastase
Blood,
April 15, 2004;
103(8):
3076 - 3083.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. Durant, M. Pederzoli, Y. Lepelletier, S. Canteloup, P. Nusbaum, P. Lesavre, and V. Witko-Sarsat Apoptosis-induced proteinase 3 membrane expression is independent from degranulation
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
January 1, 2004;
75(1):
87 - 98.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. A. Rarok, P. C. Limburg, and C. G. M. Kallenberg Neutrophil-activating potential of antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
July 1, 2003;
74(1):
3 - 15.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]