| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |



*Third Department of Internal Medicine, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan;
Institute for Molecular & Cellular Regulation, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan.
Correspondence to Dr. Akito Maeshima, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan. Phone: 81-27-220-8166; Fax: 81-27-220-8173;
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activins are multifunctional cytokines belonging to the transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) superfamily, which regulate cell growth and differentiation in many biologic systems (7,8). Activins are dimeric proteins, and subunits of activin are expressed in various organs (9). The biologic activity of activin is mediated by heteromeric receptor complexes consisting of two different types of receptor, the type I receptors (ActRI) and type II receptors (ActRII), which are characterized by an intracellular serine/threonine kinase domain (7). Activin first binds to the ActRII, and then ActRI is recruited into the complex. ActRII phosphorylates ActRI in the GS domain to activate it. Ligand binding triggers the assembly of the receptor complex, but the complex is also stabilized by direct interaction between the cytoplasmic parts of the receptors. As an intracellular mediator of activin signaling, the Smad proteins have been identified (7). Eight Smad genes have been cloned; of these, Smad-2 and Smad-3 mediate the activin signals. Upon direct phosphorylation by ActRI, Smad-2 or Smad-3 binds to its Smad-4 partner to form a heteromeric complex and translocates into the nucleus, where they can potentially regulate the transcription of target genes. The important modulator of activin action is follistatin (10). This protein specifically binds to activins and related ligands with high affinity and blocks their action (11,12). Follistatin is synthesized in the target cells of activins and remains in the extracellular matrix (13). Furthermore, the production of follistatin is regulated by activins. Hence, activin and follistatin modulate cellular functions in a complex manner. Many kinds of knockout mice, which lack activin subunit or activin receptors, were developed (1417). However, abnormality of the kidney was not described in these mutant mice. This is probably due to the redundancy in the ligands and receptor systems. We recently generated transgenic mice expressing truncated type II activin receptor under the control of
-actin promoter. In these mice, the number of glomeruli was significantly increased (18). This increase in the nephron number may result from the enhanced ureteric bud branching during development caused by the inhibition of the activin signal. It was also reported that activin A was expressed in the metanephros (19) and inhibited the branching of ureteric bud in the metanephric organ culture system (20). In an in vitro tubulogenesis model, activin A produced by MDCK cells tonically inhibits branching tubulogenesis and HGF-induced branching tubulogenesis mainly by blocking the production of activin A (21). Collectively, activin A may be a negative regulator of ureteric bud branching during kidney development (22,23). However, the precise mechanism of activin A in kidney development still remains unknown. In addition, the action of activin A on metanephric mesenchyme is not clarified at all.
The present study demonstrated that activin A and activin receptors were expressed in ureteric bud. Activin type II receptor was also expressed in metanephric mesenchyme. In an organ culture system, exogenous activin A delayed the branching of ureteric bud and enlarged the tips of ureteric bud. On the other hand, follistatin enlarged the size of cultured metanephroi, promoted the branching of ureteric bud, and increased cell growth in ureteric bud, but it induced mesenchymal cell apoptosis. In cultured metanephric mesenchymal cells, activin A promoted cell proliferation; conversely, follistatin induced apoptosis. Furthermore, activin A induced the expressions of epithelial differentiation markers in these cells. These results suggest that activin A produced by ureteric bud acts as a differentiation factor for metanephric mesenchyme.
| Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metanephric Organ Culture
Embryos were removed from anesthetized pregnant Wistar rats (Nihon SLC, Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan) on day 14 of the pregnancy. Metanephric rudiments were surgically removed from embryos. Metanephroi were explanted onto Transwell-clear (pore size: 0.4 µm; Corning Incorporated, NY) at the interface between air/5% CO2 atmosphere and medium and cultured at 37°C in DMEM containing 5% FBS and antibiotics. Cultured metanephroi were examined daily under a phase contrast microscope for up to 3 d.
Morphometry of Cultured Metanephroi
To examine the size of cultured metanephroi, we performed morphometrical analysis using image analysis software (NIH Image, public domain; NIH, Bethesda, MD) (24). Cultured metanephroi (n = 6) in each condition were photographed with a light microscope at x200 magnification at the indicated periods. The outline of cultured metanephroi was traced and each area was calculated.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry via an avidin-biotin coupling (ABC) immunoperoxidase technique was performed using a Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) according to the manufacturers instruction. Briefly, rat embryos were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in a routine manner. After inactivation of endogenous peroxidase with 1% metaperiodic acid in PBS for 10 min at room temperature (RT), sections were preincubated with normal goat/horse/rabbit serum for 60 min. Sections were then incubated for 2 h with primary antibody as follows: anti-activin A (1:100), anti-follistatin (1:20), anti-activin type I receptor (1:100), anti-activin type II receptor (1:100), anti-Smad2/3 (1:100), and anti-PCNA (1:100) antibodies. Sections were washed with PBS and reacted with a biotinylated secondary antibody for 1 h. After washing with PBS, sections were reacted with a Vectastain Elite ABC Reagent. The antibody was detected with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) in PBS, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For immunohistochemical controls, the primary antibody was replaced with normal serum of the same species as the second antibody, which did not show positive staining, confirming specificity. Tissue sections were also stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in a routine manner.
To examine the morphologic change of ureteric bud, whole-mount indirect immunofluorescence was performed. DBA was used to specifically stain ureteric bud (25). Cultured metanephroi were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, washed in Tris-buffered saline containing 1 mM CaCl2 (pH7.6) (TBS-Ca) for 5 min three times, and then fixed in cold 100% methanol for 20 min at -20°C. After incubation in 2% BSA-TBS for 1 h at 4°C, cultured metanephroi were reacted with FITC-labeled anti-DBA antibody (1:50) at 4°C overnight. After 8 h washing in TBS, cultured metanephroi were mounted and analyzed with an Olympus AX70 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a PXL 1400 cooled-CCD camera system (Photometrics, Tucson, AR), which was operated with IP Lab Spectrum software (Signal Analysis, Vienna, VA).
TUNEL Staining
To identify nuclei with DNA strand breaks at the cellular level, the TdT-mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) method was done using an Apoptosis in situ Detection Kit (Wako, Tokyo, Japan).
Reverse TranscriptasePCR
Total RNA was isolated with the TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies/BRL) from whole kidneys of fetal (E14, n = 10; E16, n = 10; E18, n = 6), neonatal (1 d, n = 1), and adult (6 wk, n = 1) rats. First-strand cDNA was made from total RNA using Superscript Preamplification System (Life Technologies/BRL) according to the manufacturers instruction. Contaminated genomic DNA was removed with RNase-free deoxyribonuclease (DNase). Five micrograms of DNase-treated RNA was incubated with 1 µl of oligodT at 70°C for 10 min. Two microliter 10 x PCR buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 500 mM KCl), 1 µl of DTT (0.1 M), 2 µl of dNTP mix (10 mM), and 2 µl of MgCl2 (25 mM) were added to each reaction. After incubation for 5 min at 42°C, 1 µl of reverse transcriptase (RT) was added. Samples were incubated at 42°C for 50 min, and then at 70°C for 15 min. RNase H (1 µl) was added to each reaction, and samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min. PCR was performed as indicated by the manufacturer (Perkin-Elmer) with the primers as follows; rat
A subunit (sense and antisense: 5'-GGACCTAACTCTCAGCCAGAGATG-3' and 5'-TCTCAAAATGCAGTGTCTTCCTGG-3', respectively), rat activin type I receptor (sense and antisense: 5'-GGTCTATGAGCAGGGGAAGATGAC-3' and 5'-ACATTTTCGCCTTG-CCAGC-3', respectively), rat activin type II receptor (sense and antisense: 5'-AGATGGAAGTCACACAGCCCAC-3' and 5'-CAACACTGGTGCCTCTTTTCTCTG-3', respectively), rat follistatin (sense and antisense: 5'-GGTGGATCAGACCAATAATGCCTAC-3' and 5'-TGGAGTAAGTCACACCATCGTTCC-3', respectively), rat GAPDH (sense and antisense: 5'-CATGACCACAGTCCATGCCATC-3' and 5'-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCATATTC-3', respectively). Reactions included 5 µl of a 10 x PCR buffer, 2 µl of MgCl2 (50 mM), 1 µl of dNTP mix, 1 µl of 3'primer, 1 µl of 5'primer, 0.5 µl of Taq polymerase, and 1 µl of cDNA. Samples were incubated at 94°C for 5 min, followed by the indicated cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, 90 s at 72°C, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min in a Perkin-Elmer DNA Thermal Cycler. PCR reactions were 30 cycles for
A subunit, activin type I and type II receptor, and follistatin and 18 cycles for GAPDH. Reactions without cDNA were used as a negative control. Rat hepatocyte cDNA was used as a positive control in each experiment. Reactions were repeated at least twice.
Construction of a Replication-Deficient Recombinant Adenovirus Vector
The recombination adenovirus, AdextARII, carrying truncated type II activin receptor (tARII) cDNA was generated by homologous recombination between the expression cosmid cassette and the parental virus genome as described previously (21). Briefly, the expression cosmid cassette was constructed by inserting the expression unit into the Swa I site of pAdex1cw (provided by I. Saito, University of Tokyo). The expression unit comprised a CMV (cytomegalovirus) promoter, tARII cDNA, and a poly A sequence. The expression cosmid cassette and adenovirus DNA-terminal protein (DNA-TPC) were cotransfected into 293 cells using a DOTAP Liposomal Transfection Reagent (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The desired recombinant adenovirus was amplified in 293 cells, purified using the CsCl density centrifugation method (27), and stored at -80°C. The titer of vital stocks was determined by plaque formation assay using 293 cells. The recombinant adenovirus, AdexLacZ, carrying the LacZ gene that codes for the Escherichia coli
-galactosidase, was provided by Dr. T. Takeuchi (Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan) and was used as a control for confirming successful transfection.
In Vitro Transfection
Embryonic kidneys removed from rats on day 14 of the pregnancy were incubated in the indicated concentrations of viral solution for 3 h at 37°C, washed with a serum-free medium, and then cultured in the complete medium containing 5% FBS for 3 d.
Detection of
-Galactosidase Activity
Embryonic kidneys were fixed with 0.25% glutaraldehyde for 10 min at 4°C, rinsed with PBS three times, and incubated for 3 h in a staining solution at 37°C. The staining solution comprised 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactoside (X-gal), 1 mM MgCl2, 3 mM K3Fe(CN), 3 mM K4Fe(CN), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 10 mM KCl in a 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5).
-Galactosidase expression was detected as the development of blue pigmentation due to the enzymatic cleavage of X-gal.
Isolation of Metanephric Mesenchymal Cells
Metanephric mesenchymal cells were isolated and cultured as described by Arar et al. (28). Fourteen-day gestation embryonic kidney rudiment was isolated, and the ureteric bud was freed surgically. The remaining mesenchyme was incubated in 0.2% collagenase (Sigma) for 5 min. Metanephric mesenchymal cells were then mechanically dissociated by gentle aspiration through repeated pippeting and plated at the density of 104 cells/cm2. Cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, penicillin, streptomycin in an atmosphere of 5% CO295% air at 37°C. Culture medium was changed every 48 h.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells grown on noncoated coverslips were washed, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and incubated sequentially with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. Cells were then incubated at RT for 1 h with primary antibody as follows: anti-vimentin (1:100), anti-cytokeratin (1:100), and anti-E-cadherin (1:100) antibodies. After washing in PBS, cells were covered with a mixture of a Cy3-labeled goat anti-rabbit lgG antibody or FITC-labeled rabbit anti-mouse IgG and 4'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI: Boehringer Mannheim). Immunofluorescence images were recorded as described above.
Western Blot Analysis
Cells were washed three times with PBS, suspended in Laemmli buffer and heated to 100°C for 10 min. After centrifugation, supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Twenty micrograms of protein from each sample was separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Nihon Millipore Ltd., Yonezawa, Japan) by electroblotting. To reduce nonspecific antibody binding, the membrane was blocked with 5% BSA, 0.1% NaN3 dissolved in Tris-saline (TS) for 1 h at 37°C and then incubated overnight with primary antibody as follows: anti-
A subunit (1:1000), anti-activin type II receptor (1:100), anti-WT1 (1:200), anti-Pax-2 (1:1000), anti-E-cadherin (1:200), anti-vimentin (1:200), and anti-Wnt4 (1:100) antibodies, and washed with Tris-PBS (PBST). After incubation with peroxidase-labeled anti-goat/rabbit/mouse IgG antibody for 1 h at RT, the membrane was washed with PBST and was analyzed by exposure to x-ray film using ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Amersham Life Science). Briefly, the membrane was incubated in equal volumes of detection reagent 1 and detection reagent 2 for 1 min. After draining off detection reagent, the membrane were wrapped in Saran wrap. Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was put on the membrane and expose film for 30 s to 2 min.
Cell Viability
Cell viability was assessed by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay as described previously (26).
Statistical Analyses
The significance of differences between means was compared by t test, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A Subunit, Activin Receptors, and Follistatin in the Metanephros
A subunit, activin type I and type II receptors and follistatin in the metanephros by RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 1, mRNA expression of
A subunit was detected in the metanephros (E14 to E18), but not in neonatal and adult kidneys. In contrast, mRNA expression of follistatin was slightly detected in the metanephros (E14 to N1), and its expression level was markedly increased in adult kidney. mRNA expressions of activin type I and type II receptor were detected in both metanephros and adult kidneys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-galactosidase activity by X-gal staining. As shown in Figure 7A,
-galactosidase activity was strongly detected in cultured metanephroi infected with AdexLacZ at a titer of 107 pfu/kidney. In these metanephroi,
-galactosidase activity was detected in ureteric bud (Figure 7A, panel f) as well as metanephric mesenchyme (Figure 7A, panel g). Adenoviral transfection did not affect the size (Figure 7B) as well as the morphologic changes (data not shown) of cultured metanephroi, suggesting the successful transfection with no cytotoxicity. We then examined the effect of infection with AdextARII at a titer of 107 pfu/kidney on cultured metanephroi. As shown in Figure 7B, the size of cultured metanephroi infected with AdextARII was significantly larger than that of cultured metanephroi infected with AdexLacZ. In these metanephroi, branching of the ureteric bud was significantly increased (data not shown). Furthermore, the number of PCNA-positive cells in ureteric bud of these metanephroi was significantly increased. However, the number of PCNA-positive cells was significantly decreased in metanephric mesenchyme of these metanephroi compared with that of cultured metanephroi infected with AdexLacZ (Figures 7C and 7D).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A subunit for activin A was expressed in metanephric mesenchyme as well as ureteric bud of E13 metanephros (Figure 2), but its expression was restricted to ureteric bud in E16 (Figure 2) or E18 (data not shown) metanephros. These results suggest that activin A acts as an autocrine factor on ureteric bud at the early phase of metanephric development, and also that at the mid or late phase of nephron differentiation, activin A plays a role on metanephric mesenchyme as a paracrine/juxtacrine factor.
As shown in Figure 1, activin type II receptor was expressed in developing, neonatal, and adult kidneys. In adult kidneys, activin type II receptor was ubiquitously localized in tubular cells, including proximal and distal tubules, and collecting ducts (39). In contrast, the expression of
A subunit for activin A was not detected in adult kidneys (Figure 1). The significance of variant pattern of their expressions remains unknown at present. However, we previously demonstrated that the expression of activin A was upregulated in tubular cells in the kidney after renal ischemia (39). Furthermore, activin A has a potential to induce tubular cell differentiation (26). Therefore, it is quite possible that activin A acts as an autocrine factor essential for kidney regeneration even after the completion of development.
In the present study, we demonstrated that activin A and activin receptors were localized in the epithelial cells of ureteric bud (Figure 2). Furthermore, Smad2/3 protein was also localized in ureteric bud (Figure 2), indicating that activin signaling pathway was activated mainly in ureteric bud. Consistent with previous findings (20), we observed that activin A delayed ureteric bud branching and enlarged the tips of ureteric bud (Figure 4). In contrast, exogenous follistatin promoted ureteric bud branching (Figure 4). Adenoviral transfection of the gene encoding the truncated type II activin receptor, which inhibits the signaling via activin receptor in a dominant-negative fashion (21), completely reproduced the effect of follistatin (Figure 7), suggesting that endogenous activin A tonically inhibits ureteric bud branching.
By which mechanism activin regulates ureteric bud branching is a question of great interest. One possibility is that activin A controls cell growth in ureteric bud. Follistatin (Figure 5) as well as adenoviral transfection of dominantly negative mutant receptor (Figure 7) significantly promoted cell growth in ureteric bud. However, activin A did not inhibit cell growth in ureteric bud (Figure 5). We previously demonstrated that activin A produced by MDCK cells tonically inhibits branching morphogenesis and blockade of activin signaling induced branching morphogenesis in an in vitro tubulogenesis model (21). Activin A did not inhibit cell growth in MDCK cells (21). Taken together, these results suggest that activin A did not directly inhibit cell cycle progression, but it is needed for ureteric bud cells to remain in the differentiated state. It is possible that blockade of activin action markedly induces cytoskeletal reorganization, immature phenotype, and subsequently cell proliferation.
One of the essential mechanisms of tissue remodeling is the process of apoptosis. During kidney development, metanephric mesenchyme is programmed for apoptosis (40). Conversion of mesenchyme to epithelium requires at least two steps: rescue of the mesenchyme from apoptosis and induction of differentiation (40). In the present study, we showed the production of activin type II receptor in cultured metanephric mesenchymal cells (Figure 8). Activin A promoted cell growth in these cells (Figure 8). In contrast, follistatin induced apoptosis in metanephric mesenchyme of cultured metanephroi (Figure 6) in addition to cultured metanephric mesenchymal cells (Figure 9). These results suggest that endogenous activin A produced by ureteric bud acts as a survival factor for metanephric mesenchymal cells. Considering that BMP-7 is known to be a survival factor for metanephric mesenchyme (3436), it is possible that blockade of activin action by follistatin resulted in the downregulation of BMP-7. Activin A may potentiate BMP-7 action though the induction of BMP-7 expression or activation of BMP-7 signaling.
Metanephric organ culture is routinely performed using serum-free medium, because serum influences metanephric growth. In our experiments, we cultured metanephric kidneys in DMEM medium containing 5% FBS. Serum includes several factors that modulate mesenchymal cell growth and differentiation, including transferrin (41). Therefore, the possibility cannot be denied that activin A induced morphologic changes of cultured metanephroi in cooperation with other factors in serum.
A large number of genes have been identified and their essential roles in epithelial differentiation of the metanephric mesenchyme (42). The Wilms tumor suppressor gene WT1 is expressed in the metanephric blastema and is required for survival of the mesenchyme surrounding the Wolffian duct (43). WT1 is required for normal renal development and is upregulated during the mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Wnt4, a member of the Wnt gene family of secreted glycoproteins, is also critical for the mesenchyme-to-epithelial transition during kidney development (44). On the other hand, Pax-2 is expressed in undifferentiated mesenchymal cells at the earliest stages of epithelialization of mesenchyme, but it is repressed in mature renal epithelium (45). In the present study, we demonstrated that activin A increased the expression of WT1, Wnt4 and decreased the expression of Pax-2 in cultured metanephric mesenchymal cells (Figure 10), suggesting that activin A promoted mesenchymal-epithelial transition. We also showed that activin A induced the expression of an epithelial marker, E-cadherin; in contrast, it decreased the expression of mesenchymal marker, vimentin, in these cells. These results suggest that activin A acts as differentiation factor for metanephric mesenchyme. WT1 expression can activate expression of a set of genes in mesenchymal cells associated with epithelial differentiation (46). E-cadherin (47), as well as Wnt4 (48), is one of the target genes of WT1. During epithelization of mesenchyme, a marked increase in WT1 protein levels coincided precisely with downregulation of the Pax-2 gene. Furthermore, WT1 directly represses Pax-2 transcription (49). Collectively, activin A may induce differentiation of metanephric mesenchymal cells by transcriptional activation of WT1. Further studies are necessary to address this issue.
In summary, we demonstrated that activin A and activin receptors were expressed in ureteric bud. Activin type II receptor was also expressed in metanephric mesenchyme. In an organ culture system, exogenous activin A delayed branching and enlarged the tips of ureteric bud. In contrast, follistatin increased ureteric bud branching and induced mesenchymal cell apoptosis. In cultured metanephric mesenchymal cells, activin A promoted cell growth; conversely, follistatin induced apoptosis. Activin A induced the expressions of differentiation markers in these cells. The present results suggest that activin A produced by ureteric bud is not only an important regulator of ureteric bud branching, but also a differentiation factor for metanephric mesenchyme during kidney development.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
A and
B subunits in various tissues predicts diverse functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 247251, 1988
B subunit disruption leads to defects eyelid development and female reproduction. Genes Dev 8: 414427, 1994
A and
Bsubunit and follistatin mRNA suggests multiple sites of action of the activin-follistatin system during human development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78: 15211524, 1994[Abstract]
regulates migration and DNA synthesis in metanephric mesenchymal cells. J Biol Chem 275: 95279533, 2000This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Maeshima, H. Sakurai, Y. Choi, S. Kitamura, D. A. Vaughn, J. B. Tee, and S. K. Nigam Glial Cell Derived Neurotrophic Factor Independent Ureteric Bud Outgrowth from the Wolffian Duct J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2007; 18(12): 3147 - 3155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vigneau, K. Polgar, G. Striker, J. Elliott, D. Hyink, O. Weber, H.-J. Fehling, G. Keller, C. Burrow, and P. Wilson Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Embryoid Bodies Generate Progenitors That Integrate Long Term into Renal Proximal Tubules In Vivo J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1709 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dickinson, D. W. Walker, E. M. Wintour, and K. Moritz Maternal dexamethasone treatment at midgestation reduces nephron number and alters renal gene expression in the fetal spiny mouse Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): R453 - R461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maeshima, H. Sakurai, and S. K. Nigam Adult Kidney Tubular Cell Population Showing Phenotypic Plasticity, Tubulogenic Capacity, and Integration Capability into Developing Kidney J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 188 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ogata, L. Li, S. Yamada, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Tanaka, I. Takei, K. Umezawa, and I. Kojima Promotion of {beta}-Cell Differentiation by Conophylline in Fetal and Neonatal Rat Pancreas Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2596 - 2602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maeshima, S. Yamashita, and Y. Nojima Identification of Renal Progenitor-Like Tubular Cells that Participate in the Regeneration Processes of the Kidney J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3138 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS |