2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111	HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP
advanced	CURRENT ISSUE	ARCHIVES	JASN Express	ONLINE SUBMISSION

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Susztak, K. Articles by Böttinger, E. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Susztak, K. Articles by Böttinger, E. P.

Genomic Strategies for Diabetic Nephropathy

Katalin Susztak^*, Kumar Sharma, Mario Schiffer^*, Peter McCue, Emilio Ciccone and Erwin P. Böttinger^*,

*Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Correspondence to Dr. Katalin Susztak, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: 718-430-3616; Fax: 718-430-2732; www.aecom.yu.edu/BottingerLab/

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 
ABSTRACT. Insight into the molecular mechanisms that underlie the origin and progression of diabetic nephropathy remains limited in part because conventional research tools have restricted investigators to focus on single genes or isolated pathways. Microarray technologies provide opportunities for evaluating genetic factors and environmental effects at a genomic scale during the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Despite the enormous power of the microarray technology, there are several pitfalls that need to be considered. This article discusses conceptual, practical, statistical, and logistical considerations for the use of microarrays in studies of experimental and human diabetic renal disease. New knowledge in this field will facilitate new approaches for molecular diagnosis and drug discovery. E-mail: ksusztak@aecom.yu.edu

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 
Diabetes is the most common metabolic disorder with an estimated worldwide prevalence between 1 and 5%. One of the most severe complications of diabetes is the development of diabetic nephropathy (DNP). Diabetic renal disease is the single most common cause of ESRD in the United States, accounting for 43% of new cases (1,2). Furthermore, diabetic ESRD is associated with a poor life expectancy.

Clinical studies have identified risk factors that correlate with the development of ESRD in diabetes. The presence of microalbuminuria, hypertension, and poor glycemic control are the most important risk factors (3). It is clear, however, that poor glycemic control alone is not sufficient for the development of this complication. Long-term observational studies show that a maximum of 35% of patients develop nephropathy, irrespective of glycemic control (4). This is in contrast to retinopathy, for which the prevalence continues to rise with the duration of diabetes. Family studies showed that among patients with type 1 diabetes, when one sibling develops nephropathy, the other one has a fourfold increased risk of nephropathy compared with the sibling of a patient without nephropathy (5). These observations have clearly established the importance of genetic risk factors in the development of DNP.

Biochemical studies have described numerous important cellular pathways in the pathogenesis of DNP, including the formation of hexosamine (6), advanced glycation end products (7), and activation of protein kinase C (PKC) (8). Enhanced intracellular glucose is thought to provide the basis for the initiation of these pathways by inducing increased mitochondrial superoxide formation (9). A common downstream event is the stimulation of matrix production via activation of TGF- signaling (10).

General modes of intervention designed to prevent the onset or progression of complications of diabetes have been shown to slow progression of DNP. For example, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study showed the importance of strict glucose and BP control in delaying diabetic complications (4,11). Recently completed large studies showed that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by either angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers slows the progression of DNP (12,13). However, specific molecular drug targets with the promise to prevent onset or progression of DNP in diabetics altogether remain to be discovered.

In addition, diagnostic and predictive molecular approaches for accurate assessment of the risk for DNP in individuals who receive a diagnosis of diabetes without renal manifestations are lacking. Here we discuss genomic strategies to find new diagnostic and therapeutic targets in DNP.

	Genetics of Diabetic Complications in Humans

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 
Epidemiologic studies have clearly established that only a subgroup of individuals with diabetes are at risk of nephropathy (2). To identify genetic determinants and candidate genes that confer susceptibility or progression for DNP in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the National Institutes of Health established the ongoing Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes study consortium. The Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes is using Mapping by Admixture Linkage Disequilibrium and traditional affected and discordant sibling pair and relative pair analyses. Previous linkage analysis studies led to the mapping of several susceptibility loci for DNP on specific regions on chromosomes 3, 7, 9, 12, and 20 (14,15).

In addition, individual research groups have used association studies based on candidate gene approaches to identify genes with variants that may confer susceptibility to DNP in humans. Association studies involve the comparison of allele and genotype frequencies at genetic loci in individuals with the condition of interest and control subjects. Table 1 summarizes most of the proposed genetic associations based on candidate gene studies. The most studied association is between ACE insertion deletion polymorphism and DNP. Elevated pro-renin, ACE, and angiotensin II levels are observed in diabetic nephropathy (16). The blockage of the renin-angiotensin system is currently the most powerful therapy to slow the progression of diabetic renal disease (12). The ACE gene polymorphism is characterized by the insertion (I) or deletion (D) of a 256-bp segment of DNA. Each individual carries two copies of the gene; those with II genotype have the lowest level of serum ACE, and those with DD have the highest. A number of studies examined the association between the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy and the D allele. Recent meta-analysis has suggested a weak association between the presence of D allele and the predisposition for DNP (17,18). Another line of evidence suggests that the ACE gene polymorphism may have an effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy (19) or on the therapeutic response (20). Additional studies suggest that the e2 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene is associated with an increased risk of nephropathy (21). Aldose reductase, the first enzyme in the polyol pathway, is also thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of DNP (22). Indeed, polymorphisms at the 5' end of the aldose reductase gene might contribute to the pathogenesis of several diabetic microangiopathic complications (23). However, existing data for most of these DNP candidate genes and susceptibility loci are not conclusive, and large studies are yet to reproduce the results of these initial observations.

	New Genomic Tools and Resources

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

Comparative genomics is a sequence-based approach made possible through the availability of complete genome sequences of human, mouse, and other model organisms. Comparative genomics allows direct comparisons of genes of interest in humans and rodent models with diabetes and diabetic complications. Together, these high-throughput genetic tools and resources will greatly enhance the discovery of genetic variants in genes that may be involved in susceptibility and pathogenesis of DNP.

In addition, the DNA microarray technology allows us to measure effects of the diabetic milieu on gene expression levels in kidney tissue on a genome-wide scale (26). Because the expression of genes is a major determinant of their function, this approach constitutes the field of functional genomics. Finally, computational and bioinformatics approaches that involve advanced database and data mining tools to facilitate the integration of genetic and genomic data with biologic and clinical data are being developed. This powerful systems biology approach promises data analysis across numerous studies and types of data at a global scale and will be critical for meaningful synthesis and interpretation of massive amounts of research data expected from genomic studies of DNP (24).

	Functional Genomics of Diabetic Nephropathy

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 
Current Limitations for Functional Genomics Studies of DNP in Humans
To date, the feasibility of finding diagnostic and outcome predictor "biomarker genes" of human diseases based on gene expression profiling has been demonstrated for various malignancies, including acute leukemia (28), breast (29), and lung cancers (30). Compared with studies on tumor material, the application of microarray studies to human diabetic nephropathy poses a different challenge to the investigators (31). Highly sensitive and reproducible methods are needed to assess gene expression profiles in a limited amount of available tissue.

The standard normal versus diseased tissue type of comparison, which is currently the basic design principle of profiling studies, carries the limitation that gene expression profile in "normal" tissue is not well characterized. Gene expression in normal tissue is likely to be dependent on several factors, including the patient’s age, gender, and genetic background. We are currently performing gene expression profile analysis of kidney biopsy materials from living kidney donors to determine normal (healthy) gene expression profiles in separated human glomerular and tubular compartments. In this ongoing pilot project, we will analyze and estimate the influence of underlying genetic and environmental factors on renal gene expression profiles. The anticipated information will be essential for sample size calculation for future genome-wide molecular studies on human DNP.

Another major limitation for studies of diabetic renal disease at a molecular level is that current clinical practice usually does not require tissue analysis to establish the diagnosis of DNP. The diagnosis of DNP is commonly established on the basis of clinical criteria, and it is common practice to avoid kidney biopsies of patients with diabetes. Recently, this paradigm has been challenged and several reports suggest that individuals with diabetes could have diverse primary renal disease, not only DNP (32).

In cases in which kidney biopsy material is available, interpretation may be confounded by tissue heterogeneity. The proportion of glomeruli and different tubular segments presented in the biopsy material can vary significantly. Earlier studies established that manual microdissection is an effective approach that allows efficient separation of glomeruli and tubuli in experienced hands. Laser capture microdissection technology (33,34) could present a powerful alternative to manual microdissection. It allows accurate identification and procurement of glomerular or tubular cells from tissue samples under direct microscopic visualization. Archive samples can also be analyzed with laser capture microdissection; however, a major drawback of this technique is the low amount and often inadequate quality of mRNA that is extracted from a fixed tissue.

Because renal biopsies represent a minute fraction of the diseased organ, considerable sample bias is inevitable. A representative number of glomeruli are required to obtain adequate profiles. However, in most cases, glomeruli or tubuli at different disease stages are represent in single needle biopsy material. Detailed histopathologic examination of the biopsy material, including light and electron microscopic analysis, can help to overcome these difficulties.

Another challenge is the inherent instability of mRNA. Several promising technical innovations are currently under development to overcome this problem. A new class of RNAse inhibitors provided in commercial reagents (e.g., RNALater; Ambion, Austin, TX) allows good preservation of RNA. New column-based RNA extraction methods provide high-quality RNA quickly with minimal loss during extraction. RNA quantification and quality measurements are critical steps for gene expression studies. A new technology (Lab on Chip) (35), which is based on capillary gel electrophoresis, has revolutionized this field, and as little as picogram quantities of RNA can now be accurately analyzed.

DNA array-based technology is the method of choice for comprehensive gene expression profiling. One major limitation was that earlier array technologies had required large amount (20 to 100 µg) of high-quality total RNA as a starting material. Recently, new technologies with improved RNA amplification and labeling became available (36,37). A major concern is the linearity of the amplification across different mRNA species. With highly effective amplification, even small differences in amplification efficiencies can result in significantly distorted representation of individual transcripts.

Microarrays deliver massive amounts of data on tens of thousands of genes. The result is an immense quantity of biologic information that needs to be analyzed, presented, and archived in a meaningful way. Therefore, functional genomic studies should be combined with advanced computational and statistical approaches. The gene expression data have to be analyzed in conjunction with other clinical and histopathologic variables. Despite the different variables, most of the published studies to date using microarray-based expression analysis include only limited numbers of replicates. In fact, many studies conduct the experiment only once. Considering the potential sources of assay variation, the need for sufficiently replicated studies is underscored. In addition and importantly, potential gene candidates must be assessed for relevance to disease by using parallel technologies at RNA and protein level and, more important, in functional studies.

Functional Genomic Studies of Kidneys in Existing Rodent Models of Diabetes
The use of animal models of diabetes can provide an immediate and simple alternative to overcome the technical limitations of functional genomic studies of humans. Animal model systems are genetically homogeneous, and environmental factors can be easily controlled. However, the available mouse models do not represent the human disease faithfully.

There are distinct changes that one can observe during the development and progression of human diabetic nephropathy. This is characterized by an early increase in GFR, microalbuminuria, renal enlargement, glomerular hypertrophy, and widening of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). This is followed by expansion of the mesangium, with an increase in both the cellular and the matrix components. Classically, four types of glomerular lesions are found in established human diabetic renal disease: diffuse glomerulosclerosis, nodular glomerulosclerosis, fibrin-cap lesion, and capsular-drop lesion (38). Diffuse glomerulosclerosis is the most commonly observed lesion and consists of widespread increase of eosinophilic, periodic acid-Schiff–positive matrix material in the mesangial area. The nodular lesion is the most specific histologic abnormality but is not always found in patients with DNP. As nephropathy advances to end stage, tubulointerstitial lesions such as tubular atrophy, interstitial monocellular infiltration, and fibrosis develop.

Several animal models spontaneously develop diabetes (39), manifested by a variety of clinical symptoms similar to those of human diabetes. In general, the expression and severity of metabolic, hormonal, and pathologic abnormalities vary depending on the strain, genetic background, nutrition, and age. Because of this heterogeneity, no single animal model represents all features of diabetes in humans. Similarly, diabetic animals may develop kidney disease, which resembles human diabetic nephropathy, but the renal changes are not identical. Usually, the histologic appearance of the glomerular lesions are very similar to early stages of human diabetic nephropathy; however, changes that are characteristic of later stages of DNP are absent. The explanation of this phenomenon is currently under intensive investigation. Table 2 summarizes the pathologic lesions observed in various diabetic mouse models.

Db/db mice, which have a recessive mutation in the hypothalamic leptin receptor, develop obesity at 4 wk of age and type 2 diabetes at approximately 8 wk of age. In C57BL/6J background, the diabetes and the obesity are usually less severe than in the C57BL/KsJ background (44). Kidneys are generally enlarged in this mouse strain, and structural glomerular changes (e.g., diffuse glomerulosclerosis, GBM thickening) occur without evidence of tubulointerstitial disease (40). Glomerular lesions of the KK mice are characterized by diffuse and nodular mesangial sclerosis without evidence of tubular disease (45). The lack of reliable mouse models prompted the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to fund a consortium for the development and phenotyping of new diabetic mouse models that would resemble closely human DNP.

Genetic modification of the existing mouse models might improve the currently used models. Modification of the scavenger receptor system by overexpressing the receptor for advanced glycated end product (46) in endothelial cells clearly enhanced the glomerular disease in a spontaneous diabetic model system, which did not develop glomerular disease otherwise. Similarly targeted deletion of the galectin-3 gene greatly accelerated the diabetic kidney disease in STZ-treated mice (47). These observations highlight the importance of the scavenger receptor system and its ligands in the pathogenesis of DNP. Another interesting approach involved modification of the lipid signaling system via overexpression of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in the kidney (48).

Current Adaptation of Functional Genomics Studies of Kidneys in Diabetic Mice
Detailed examination and comparisons of diabetic mouse models to the human disease can identify pathways that are important in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic renal disease. Genes and new pathways that are identified as significantly differentially expressed in mice with diabetic kidney disease can be evaluated as prognostic or diagnostic markers for development of progressive renal disease or potential drug targets.

To screen for genes that show correlation with different phenotypic outcome in diabetic mouse models, we used the cross-sectional design and performed microarray analysis on 24-wk-old STZ-treated and db/db mice with established renal pathology. In parallel with the functional genomics characterization, each individual mouse underwent a detailed renal phenotype analysis. Mice that were treated with low doses of STZ developed diabetes and moderately severe albuminuria (twice the control). In mice with C57B6/J background, the mesangial changes were mild or absent. Mice with 129SvJ genetic background developed significant glomerular changes. However, these were not significantly different from the age-matched controls (K. Sharma, K. Susztak, and E.P. Böttinger, unpublished observations). The db/db mice became insulin resistant and developed diabetes at approximately 8 wk of age. Albuminuria was detected as early as 3 to 4 wk after the development of hyperglycemia. The glomerular histology was characterized by severe diffuse mesangial expansion, as previously reported (49).

This experimental set-up allowed us to group animals on the basis of the phenotypic outcome rather than of their underlying genotype. To identify genes with correlation to certain phenotype, we used the statistical analysis of microarray data (50). Supervised data mining algorithms were applied to find genes with the highest discriminative value for a certain phenotypic outcome (hyperglycemia, mesangial pathology) (28). This method, which is based on the k-nearest-neighborhood algorithm, first constructs a hypothetical gene expression profile that best fits the desired pattern (e.g., a gene with high expression in hyperglycemic animals and low expression in animals with normal glucose values, or vice versa). The technique then identifies individual genes that are most similar to the hypothetical gene expression profile.

Unsupervised methods can be used to answer different questions. The main advantage of these methods is that they could uncover new, unexpected subclasses within the same diseased group. However, in general, they are less intuitive. From these methods, we used hierarchical clustering in the initial phase of the analysis. It sorted all genes (or samples) such that genes or samples with similar profiles appear near to each other. The number and size of expression patterns within a data set can be estimated quickly, although the division of the tree into actual clusters is often performed visually.

Functional genomic analysis on different diabetic mouse models provided a global view into the pathomechanisms of DNP. With advanced computational approaches, we have identified new markers that could discriminate different phenotypic appearances in mice. The discriminative value of these markers has been validated on diabetic animals that were not part of the microarray analysis. Further analysis of the marker genes based on classic biochemical approaches is currently under way in our laboratory.

	Conclusions

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 
Functional genomic approaches combined with advanced phenotypic characterization and computational algorithms are new, powerful methods. Application of these methods for diabetic nephropathy shows a great promise but also poses challenges for the investigators. Microarrays make it possible to investigate differential gene expression in normal versus diseased tissue, in treated versus nontreated tissue, and in different stages during the natural course of a disease, all on a genomic scale. Gene expression profiles may help to unlock the molecular basis of phenotype, response to treatment, and heterogeneity of disease. They may also help to define patterns of expression that will aid in diagnosis as well as define susceptibility loci that may lead to the identification of individuals at risk. Finally, as specific genes are identified and their functional roles in the development and course of disease are characterized, new targets for therapy should be identified. The overall goal is to obtain complementary information that allows a stringent prediction concerning the diagnosis, prognosis, and differential therapy.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported by grants RO1DK56077, RO1DK60043, and U24DK58768-01A1 to E.P.B. M.S. is a research fellow of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. K. Susztak is a research fellow of the Kidney and Urological Foundation and received support from the Einstein Clinical Investigator Fellowship.

The authors thank Dr. T. Rohacs for carefully reading the manuscript.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Genetics of Diabetic... New Genomic Tools and... Functional Genomics of Diabetic... Conclusions References

 

1. Renal Data System. USRDS 1998 Annual Data Report. NIH Publication No. NIDDK 98-3176, Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 1998
2. Ritz E, Orth SR: Nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 341: 1127–1133, 1999[Free Full Text]
3. Parving HH: Diabetic nephropathy: Prevention and treatment. Kidney Int 60: 2041–2055, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications (DCCT) Research Group. Kidney Int 47: 1703–1720, 1995[Medline]
5. Seaquist ER, Goetz FC, Rich S, Barbosa J: Familial clustering of diabetic kidney disease. Evidence for genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 320: 1161–1165, 1989[Abstract]
6. Du XL, Edelstein D, Rossetti L, Fantus IG, Goldberg H, Ziyadeh F, Wu J, Brownlee M: Hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide overproduction activates the hexosamine pathway and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression by increasing Sp1 glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 12222–12226, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Brownlee M: Glycation products and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Diabetes Care 15: 1835–1843, 1992[Abstract]
8. Fumo P, Kuncio GS, Ziyadeh FN: PKC and high glucose stimulate collagen alpha 1 (IV) transcriptional activity in a reporter mesangial cell line. Am J Physiol 267: F632–F638, 1994
9. Brownlee M: Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature 414: 813–820, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Isono M, Mogyorosi A, Han DC, Hoffman BB, Ziyadeh FN: Stimulation of TGF-beta type II receptor by high glucose in mouse mesangial cells and in diabetic kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F830–F838, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ 317: 703–713, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 345: 861–869, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD: The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 329: 1456–1462, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Moczulski DK, Rogus JJ, Antonellis A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Major susceptibility locus for nephropathy in type 1 diabetes on chromosome 3q: Results of novel discordant sib-pair analysis. Diabetes 47: 1164–1169, 1998[Abstract]
15. Bowden DW, Sale M, Howard TD, Qadri A, Spray BJ, Rothschild CB, Akots G, Rich SS, Freedman BI: Linkage of genetic markers on human chromosomes 20 and 12 to NIDDM in Caucasian sib pairs with a history of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 46: 882–886, 1997[Abstract]
16. Franken AA, Derkx FH, Man in’t Veld AJ, Hop WC, van Rens GH, Peperkamp E, De Jong PT, Schalekamp MA: High plasma prorenin in diabetes mellitus and its correlation with some complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71: 1008–1015, 1990[Abstract]
17. Fujisawa T, Ikegami H, Kawaguchi Y, Hamada Y, Ueda H, Shintani M, Fukuda M, Ogihara T: Meta-analysis of association of insertion/deletion polymorphism of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy. Diabetologia 41: 47–53, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Kunz R, Bork JP, Fritsche L, Ringel J, Sharma AM: Association between the angiotensin-converting enzyme-insertion/deletion polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy: A methodologic appraisal and systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1653–1663, 1998[Abstract]
19. Hadjadj S, Belloum R, Bouhanick B, Gallois Y, Guilloteau G, Chatellier G, Alhenc-Gelas F, Marre M: Prognostic value of angiotensin-I converting enzyme I/D polymorphism for nephropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 541–549, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Parving HH, Jacobsen P, Tarnow L, Rossing P, Lecerf L, Poirier O, Cambien F: Effect of deletion polymorphism of angiotensin converting enzyme gene on progression of diabetic nephropathy during inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme: Observational follow-up study. BMJ 313: 591–594, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Chowdhury TA, Dyer PH, Kumar S, Gibson SP, Rowe BR, Davies SJ, Marshall SM, Morris PJ, Gill GV, Feeney S, Maxwell P, Savage D, Boulton AJ, Todd JA, Dunger D, Barnett AH, Bain SC: Association of apolipoprotein epsilon2 allele with diabetic nephropathy in Caucasian subjects with IDDM. Diabetes 47: 278–280, 1998[Medline]
22. Yamamoto T, Sato T, Hosoi M, Yoshioka K, Tanaka S, Tahara H, Nishizawa Y, Fujii S: Aldose reductase gene polymorphism is associated with progression of diabetic nephropathy in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab 5: 51–57, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Heesom AE, Millward A, Demaine AG: Susceptibility to diabetic neuropathy in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a polymorphism at the 5' end of the aldose reductase gene. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64: 213–216, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Lander ES: The new genomics: Global views of biology. Science 274: 536–539, 1996[Free Full Text]
25. Beck MT, Holle L, Chen WY: Combination of PCR subtraction and cDNA microarray for differential gene expression profiling. Biotechniques 31: 782–784, 786, 2001
26. Bottinger EP, Ju W, Zavadil J: Applications for microarrays in renal biology and medicine. Exp Nephrol 10: 93–101, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Kurella M, Hsiao LL, Yoshida T, Randall JD, Chow G, Sarang SS, Jensen RV, Gullans SR: DNA microarray analysis of complex biologic processes. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 1072–1078, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES: Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286: 531–537, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de RM, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D: Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406: 747–752, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
30. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH, Bernards R: A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347: 1999–2009, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Kretzler M, Cohen CD, Doran P, Henger A, Madden S, Grone EF, Nelson PJ, Schlondorff D, Grone HJ: Repuncturing the renal biopsy: Strategies for molecular diagnosis in nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1961–1972, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Serra A, Romero R, Bayes B, Lopez D, Bonet J: Is there a need for changes in renal biopsy criteria in proteinuria in type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 58: 149, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Bonner RF, Emmert-Buck M, Cole K, Pohida T, Chuaqui R, Goldstein S, Liotta LA: Laser capture microdissection: molecular analysis of tissue. Science 278: 1481–1483, 1997[Free Full Text]
34. Aaltonen P, Luimula P, Astrom E, Palmen T, Gronholm T, Palojoki E, Jaakkola I, Ahola H, Tikkanen I, Holthofer H: Changes in the expression of nephrin gene and protein in experimental diabetic nephropathy. Lab Invest 81: 1185–1190, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Gottwald E, Muller O, Polten A: Semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Electrophoresis 22: 4016–4022, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Xiang CC, Kozhich OA, Chen M, Inman JM, Phan QN, Chen Y, Brownstein MJ: Amine-modified random primers to label probes for DNA microarrays. Nat Biotechnol 20: 738–742, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Iscove NN, Barbara M, Gu M, Gibson M, Modi C, Winegarden N: Representation is faithfully preserved in global cDNA amplified exponentially from sub-picogram quantities of mRNA. Nat Biotechnol 20: 940–943, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Mauer SM, Steffes MW, Ellis EN, Sutherland DE, Brown DM, Goetz FC: Structural-functional relationships in diabetic nephropathy. J Clin Invest 74: 1143–1155, 1984
39. Velasquez MT, Kimmel PL, Michaelis OE: Animal models of spontaneous diabetic kidney disease. FASEB J 4: 2850–2859, 1990[Abstract]
40. Sharma K, Jin Y, Guo J, Ziyadeh FN: Neutralization of TGF-beta by anti-TGF-beta antibody attenuates kidney hypertrophy and the enhanced extracellular matrix gene expression in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Diabetes 45: 522–530, 1996[Abstract]
41. Hall-Craggs M, Brenner DE, Vigorito RD, Sutherland JC: Acute renal failure and renal tubular squamous metaplasia following treatment with streptozotocin. Hum Pathol 13: 597–601, 1982[Medline]
42. Sharma K, Ziyadeh FN: Renal hypertrophy is associated with upregulation of TGF-beta 1 gene expression in diabetic BB rat and NOD mouse. Am J Physiol 267: F1094–F2001, 1994
43. Haseyama T, Fujita T, Hirasawa F, Tsukada M, Wakui H, Komatsuda A, Ohtani H, Miura AB, Imai H, Koizumi A: Complications of IgA nephropathy in a non-insulin-dependent diabetes model, the Akita mouse. Tohoku J Exp Med 198: 233–244, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Doolittle DP: Mouse Locus Catalog, 1998. Available at: www.informatics.jax.org
45. Wehner H: Sequence of changes in KK mouse nephropathy. Adv Exp Med Biol 246: 147–156, 1988[Medline]
46. Yamamoto Y, Kato I, Doi T, Yonekura H, Ohashi S, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T, Yamagishi S, Sakurai S, Takasawa S, Okamoto H, Yamamoto H: Development and prevention of advanced diabetic nephropathy in RAGE-overexpressing mice. J Clin Invest 108: 261–268, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Pugliese G, Pricci F, Iacobini C, Leto G, Amadio L, Barsotti P, Frigeri L, Hsu DK, Vlassara H, Liu FT, di Mario U: Accelerated diabetic glomerulopathy in galectin-3/AGE receptor 3 knockout mice. FASEB J 15: 2471–2479, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Sun L, Halaihel N, Zhang W, Rogers T, Levi M: Role of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 in regulation of renal lipid metabolism and glomerulosclerosis in diabetes mellitus. J Biol Chem 277: 18919–18927, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Ziyadeh FN, Hoffman BB, Han DC, Iglesias-de la Cruz MC, Hong SW, Isono M, Chen S, McGowan TA, Sharma K: Long-term prevention of renal insufficiency, excess matrix gene expression, and glomerular mesangial matrix expansion by treatment with monoclonal antitransforming growth factor-beta antibody in db/db diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 8015–8020, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5116–5121, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Pyke DA, Tattersall RB: Diabetic retinopathy in identical twins. Diabetes 22: 613–618, 1973[Medline]
52. Fogarty DG, Harron JC, Hughes AE, Nevin NC, Doherty CC, Maxwell AP: A molecular variant of angiotensinogen is associated with diabetic nephropathy in IDDM. Diabetes 45: 1204–1208, 1996[Abstract]
53. Doria A, Onuma T, Gearin G, Freire MB, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Angiotensinogen polymorphism M235T, hypertension, and nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes. Hypertension 27: 1134–1139, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Miller JA, Thai K, Scholey JW: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism and the response to hyperglycemia in early type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 49: 1585–1589, 2000[Abstract]
55. Hansen PM, Chowdhury T, Deckert T, Hellgren A, Bain SC, Pociot F: Genetic variation of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan gene (perlecan gene). Association with urinary albumin excretion in IDDM patients. Diabetes 46: 1658–1659, 1997[Medline]
56. Araki S, Moczulski DK, Hanna L, Scott LJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: APOE polymorphisms and the development of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: Results of case-control and family-based studies. Diabetes 49: 2190–2195, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Araki S, Makita Y, Canani L, Ng D, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Polymorphisms of human paraoxonase 1 gene (PON1) and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 43: 1540–1543, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Neugebauer S, Baba T, Watanabe T: Association of the nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism with an increased risk for progression to diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 49: 500–503, 2000[Abstract]
59. Neugebauer S, Baba T, Watanabe T: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism as a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy in NIDDM patients. Lancet 352: 454, 1998
60. Tarnow L, Pociot F, Hansen PM, Rossing P, Nielsen FS, Hansen BV, Parving HH: Polymorphisms in the interleukin-1 gene cluster do not contribute to the genetic susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy in Caucasian patients with IDDM. Diabetes 46: 1075–1076, 1997[Medline]
61. Schmidt S, Bluthner M, Giessel R, Strojek K, Bergis KH, Grzeszczak W, Ritz E: A polymorphism in the gene for the atrial natriuretic peptide and diabetic nephropathy. Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 1807–1810, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Fogarty DG, Zychma MJ, Scott LJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: The C825T polymorphism in the human G-protein beta3 subunit gene is not associated with diabetic nephropathy in type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 41: 1304–1308, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Canani LH, Ng DP, Smiles A, Rogus JJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Polymorphism in ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 gene (ENPP1/PC-1) and early development of advanced diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 51: 1188–1193, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Ng DP, Canani L, Araki S, Smiles A, Moczulski D, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Minor effect of GLUT1 polymorphisms on susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 51: 2264–2269, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Ng DP, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: TGF-beta 1 as a genetic susceptibility locus for advanced diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus: An investigation of multiple known DNA sequence variants. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 22–28, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Granier, K. Makni, L. Molina, B. Jardin-Watelet, H. Ayadi, and F. Jarraya Gene and protein markers of diabetic nephropathy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 792 - 799. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Kumpers, F. Gueler, S. Rong, M. Mengel, I. Tossidou, I. Peters, H. Haller, and M. Schiffer Leptin is a coactivator of TGF-beta in unilateral ureteral obstructive kidney disease Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1355 - F1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Susztak and E. P. Bottinger Diabetic Nephropathy: A Frontier for Personalized Medicine J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Susztak, A. C. Raff, M. Schiffer, and E. P. Bottinger Glucose-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Cause Apoptosis of Podocytes and Podocyte Depletion at the Onset of Diabetic Nephropathy Diabetes, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 225 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schiffer, K. Susztak, M. Ranalletta, A. C. Raff, E. P. Bottinger, and M. J. Charron Localization of the GLUT8 glucose transporter in murine kidney and regulation in vivo in nondiabetic and diabetic conditions Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): F186 - F193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Susztak, E. Bottinger, A. Novetsky, D. Liang, Y. Zhu, E. Ciccone, D. Wu, S. Dunn, P. McCue, and K. Sharma Molecular Profiling of Diabetic Mouse Kidney Reveals Novel Genes Linked to Glomerular Disease Diabetes, March 1, 2004; 53(3): 784 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Susztak, K. Articles by Böttinger, E. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Susztak, K. Articles by Böttinger, E. P.