| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
BASIC SCIENCE |
2-MicroglobulinRelated Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH

,


*Department of Pathology, Fukui Medical University, Fukui, Japan;
Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan;
Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; and
CREST of Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama, Japan
Correspondence to Dr. Hironobu Naiki, Department of Pathology, Fukui Medical University, Fukui 910-1193, Japan. Phone: +81-776-61-8320; Fax: +81-776-61-8123;
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-Microglobulinrelated (A
2M) amyloidosis is a frequent and serious complication in patients on long-term dialysis, and
2-microglobulin is a major structural component of A
2M amyloid fibrils. Several biologic molecules inhibiting the depolymerization of A
2M amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH were found recently. The effect of trifluoroethanol and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) on the extension of the fibrils at a neutral pH was investigated with the use of fluorescence spectroscopy with thioflavin T, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and electron microscopy. Trifluoroethanol at concentrations of up to 20% (vol/vol) caused fibril extension of heparin-stabilized seeds, inducing a subtle change in the tertiary structure of
2-microglobulin and stabilizing the fibrils at a neutral pH. This extension reaction followed a first-order kinetic model. In addition, some GAG, especially heparin, dose-dependently enhanced the fibril extension. These results suggest that some GAG, especially heparin, may bind to the fibrils and enhance their deposition in vivo. Thus, the experimental system described here should be useful to search for the factors that accelerate A
2M amyloid deposition in vivo. In addition, the interference of the binding of GAG to A
2M amyloid fibrils may be an attractive therapeutic modality. E-mail: naiki@fmsrsa.fukui-med.ac.jp | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-Microglobulinrelated (A
2M) amyloidosis is a frequent and serious complication in patients on long-term dialysis (1). Carpal tunnel syndrome and destructive arthropathy associated with cystic bone lesions are the major clinical manifestations of A
2M amyloidosis (2,3). Several biochemical and cell biologic studies have revealed that intact
2-microglobulin (
2-m) is a major structural component of amyloid fibrils deposited in the synovial membrane of the carpal tunnel (47), but the mechanism of the deposition of these amyloid fibrils is still incompletely understood. Although the retention of
2-m in the plasma seems to be prerequisite (8), other factors, such as the age of the patient, the duration of dialysis, and the type of dialysis membrane used, may also be involved (911). We and other groups have proposed that a nucleation- dependent polymerization model could explain the general mechanism of amyloid fibril formation in vitro, in various types of amyloidosis (1217). This model consists of two phases: a nucleation phase and an extension phase. Nucleus formation requires a series of association steps of monomers, which are thermodynamically unfavorable, representing the rate-limiting step in amyloid fibril formation in vitro. Once the nucleus (n-mer) has been formed, further addition of monomers becomes thermodynamically favorable, resulting in rapid extension of amyloid fibrils according to a first-order kinetic model (12,14,16).
The extension of A
2M amyloid fibrils, as well as the formation of the fibrils from
2-m, is greatly dependent on the pH of the reaction mixture, with the optimum pH at approximately 2.0 to 3.0 (16,17). However, they readily depolymerize into monomeric
2-m at a neutral pH (18). At pH 2.5, where the extension of A
2M amyloid fibrils is optimum,
2-m loses much of the secondary and tertiary structures observed at pH 7.5 (17,18). Once incorporated into A
2M amyloid fibrils at pH 2.5,
2-m becomes highly rich in
-sheet structure and obtains the secondary and tertiary structures strikingly different from monomeric
2-m at both pH 7.5 and 2.5 (19). Heegaard et al. (20) demonstrated that
2-m forms the amyloidogenic conformer in the presence of acetonitrile or 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) at a neutral pH. Chiti et al. (21,22) also reported that a partially structured species of
2-m closely similar to that at an acidic pH is significantly populated under physiologic conditions and transiently involved in the extension reaction of fibrils extracted from patients. However, for analyzing the effect of various biologic molecules and organic compounds on A
2M amyloid fibril formation in vitro, it is essential to develop an experimental system whereby the kinetics of fibril formation is constantly and stably observed at a neutral pH.
A
2M amyloid deposits in patients contain many kinds of amyloid-associated molecules: glycosaminoglycans (GAG), proteoglycans (PG) (23,24), apolipoprotein E (25), serum amyloid P component (26), and plasma proteinase inhibitors (27). The earliest deposition of A
2M amyloid fibrils is observed in the cartilage tissue highly rich in GAG and PG (28,29). GAG such as heparan sulfate (HS) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) are constantly increased in A
2M amyloid deposits (23,24,30). The roles of PG and their constituent GAG for amyloid fibril formation in vitro have been studied extensively in various types of human as well as murine amyloidosis (3133). Recently, we reported that GAG and PG accelerate A
2M amyloid fibril formation at an acidic pH (34) and that apolipoprotein E, GAG, and PG inhibit the depolymerization of fibrils at a neutral pH (18,34). These amyloid-associated factors, especially GAG, may act as an enhancing factor for the deposition of A
2M amyloid fibrils in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of A
2M Amyloid Fibrils, Unmodified Seeds, and Heparin-Stabilized Seeds
Unmodified A
2M amyloid fibrils composed solely of recombinant
2-m (r-
2-m) were formed by the repeated extension reaction at pH 2.5 with r-
2-m expressed in methyltrophic yeast Pichia pastoris (35) and the patient-derived S0 seeds as described previously (36). The algorithmic protocol was repeated six times, and F6 fibrils and S6 seeds were obtained from S5 seeds. The S6 seeds were designated the unmodified seeds. Heparin-stabilized seeds were formed by the depolymerization reaction of the F6 fibrils with heparin at pH 7.5 as described previously (34).
Extension Assay of A
2M Amyloid Fibrils
The reaction mixture was prepared on ice and contained 0 to 90 µg/ml heparin-stabilized or unmodified seeds, 0 to 50 µM r-
2-m, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and various concentrations of protein denaturants or organic solvents: 0 to 30% (vol/vol) TFE, 0 to 4 M urea, 0 to 60% (vol/vol) ethanol, 0 to 60% (vol/vol) acetonitrile, and 0 to 30% (vol/vol) DMSO. In some experiments, 10 to 200 µg/ml heparin or other GAG were added to the reaction mixture (as indicated in each figure). After being mixed by brief vortexing of the mixture, 30-µl aliquots were put into oil-free PCR tubes (0.5 ml in size; Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd., Otsu, Japan) on ice. The reaction tubes were then transferred into a DNA thermal cycler (PJ480; Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Emeryville, CA) and incubated at 37°C without agitation. After incubation for 0 to 72 h, the reaction was stopped by placing the tubes on ice. From each reaction tube, three 5-µl aliquots were removed, then subjected to fluorescence spectroscopy with thioflavin T (ThT) (16), and the mean of each triplicate was determined.
Depolymerization Assay of A
2M Amyloid Fibrils
Fresh F6 fibrils extended at pH 2.5 were centrifuged at 18,500 x g for 2 h at 4°C. The precipitate was washed and resuspended in ice-cold 100 mM NaCl. The reaction mixture was prepared on ice and contained 300 µg/ml F6 fibrils, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 0 or 20% (vol/vol) TFE. After being mixed by pipetting, 30-µl aliquots were put into PCR tubes. The reaction tubes were then transferred into a DNA thermal cycler and incubated at 37°C without agitation. After a 0- to 24-h incubation, the reaction was stopped by placing the tubes on ice. From each reaction tube, three 5-µl aliquots were subjected to fluorescence spectroscopy, and the mean of each triplicate was determined.
CD Spectra of r-
2-m in the Presence of TFE and Heparin
CD spectra of r-
2-m were recorded on a Jasco 725 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) at 25°C as described previously (18). The reaction mixture contained 25 µM r-
2-m, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 0 to 30% (vol/vol) TFE, and 0 to 100 µg/ml heparin. For measurements in the near-UV region (250 to 350 nm), 100 mM NaCl was also added to the mixture. The results are expressed in terms of mean residue ellipticity.
Quantification of Heparin Bound to the A
2M Amyloid Fibrils
A
2M amyloid fibrils were extended with r-
2-m in the presence of heparin at pH 7.5 for 48 h, then collected by centrifugation at 18,500 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The precipitate was washed and resuspended in 100 mM NaCl, and this procedure was repeated three times to cleanse monomeric r-
2-m and unbound heparin. Then a quantitative dimethylmethylene blue dyebinding method (Blyscan Proteoglycan and GAG Assay System) was used to determine the concentration of heparin on the A
2M amyloid fibrils according to the manufacturers instruction (Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corp., Westbury, NY) (37).
Other Analytical Procedures
Electron microscopy and Congo red staining of A
2M amyloid fibrils were performed as described previously (16). Protein concentrations of r-
2-m and A
2M amyloid fibrils were determined by the method using bicinchoninic acid (38) and a commercial protein assay kit (code 23235; Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Stastical Analysis
One-way ANOVA with post hoc test by Dunnett and linear least squares fit were used for statistical analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2M Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH in the Presence of TFE
2-m at pH 7.5 in the presence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE, the ThT fluorescence increased without a lag phase and proceeded to equilibrium, whereas the ThT fluorescence was almost unchanged in the absence of TFE, as described previously (34). However, when the unmodified seeds were incubated with 25 µM r-
2-m at pH 7.5 in the presence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE, the fluorescence increase was smaller than in the case of the heparin-stabilized seeds. In addition, in the absence of TFE, the fluorescence of the unmodified seeds decreased immediately after the initiation of the reaction, as described previously (18). In the absence of seeds, TFE did not cause polymerization of r-
2-m at pH 7.5 after a 21-d incubation (data not shown).
|
|
|
2-m (0 to 50 µM; data not shown). These data suggest that the extension of the heparin-stabilized seeds can be explained by a first-order kinetic model (14,16).
Effect of TFE on the Conformation of r-
2-m
CD spectra of r-
2-m were measured at pH 7.5 in the presence of 0 to 30% (vol/vol) TFE (Figure 4). In the absence of TFE, the far-UV CD spectrum of r-
2-m exhibited a positive peak at 206 nm and a negative peak at 221 nm, and the near-UV CD spectrum of r-
2-m exhibited positive peaks at 260, 269, 282, 288, and 293 nm. These data indicate that r-
2-m in the absence of TFE at pH 7.5 is rich in
-sheet conformation and has a compact tertiary structure, as described previously (18). However, the far-UV CD spectrum of r-
2-m at 30% (vol/vol) TFE exhibited a major negative peak at 206 nm and a minor negative peak at 230 nm. In the near-UV CD spectrum of r-
2-m at 30% (vol/vol) TFE, the positive ellipticity observed at 0% (vol/vol) TFE was eliminated, and negative peaks were observed between 250 and 290 nm. These data indicate that at 30% (vol/vol) TFE, the secondary structure of r-
2-m had changed into the mixture of random and helical structures, and the tertiary structure was also fairly loosened as compared with the structure at 0% (vol/vol) TFE. The transit of the near-UV spectra was observed between 15 and 25% (vol/vol) TFE, whereas that of the far-UV spectra was observed between 20 and 30% (vol/vol) TFE. These data suggest that a subtle change in the tertiary structure may take place at approximately 20% (vol/vol) TFE with no significant change in the secondary structure.
|
2M Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH
2M amyloid fibrils extended at pH 2.5 (F6 fibrils) were incubated at pH 7.5 in the absence of TFE, the ThT fluorescence decreased immediately after the initiation of the reaction, as described previously (18). However, in the presence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE, the fluorescence remained >80% of the initial fluorescence throughout the reaction.
|
2M Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH in the Presence of TFE
|
2-m remained in the supernatant fraction and decreased dose-dependently (Figure 7A). The concentration of polymerized r-
2-m (total r-
2-m minus soluble r-
2-m) correlated positively with the increase of ThT fluorescence (r = 0.931). This may indicate that r-
2-m initially added to the mixture was consumed to the extension of A
2M amyloid fibrils. As shown in Figure 7B, the heparin concentration bound to the fibrils increased dose-dependently with the initial heparin concentration. Positive correlation was observed between the heparin concentration bound to the fibrils and the fluorescence increase (r = 0.947). Heparin itself did not quench or enhance ThT fluorescence of A
2M amyloid fibrils (data not shown). This may indicate that heparin uniformly binds to the surface of extended A
2M amyloid fibrils irrespective of the fibril length. The morphology of the fibrils in the presence of heparin was similar to that in the absence of heparin (Figure 3, B versus E). Moreover, both fibrils in Figure 3, B and E, were stained positively with Congo red and showed orange-green birefringence under polarized light (data not shown). All of these data clearly indicate that heparin enhances the extension of A
2M amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH in the presence of TFE.
|
2-m at pH 7.5 in both the presence and the absence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE (data not shown). This may indicate that heparin itself is unable to induce the conformational change of r-
2-m irrespective of the presence or absence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2M Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH in the Presence of TFE
2M amyloid fibril extension at a neutral pH. TFE is known as a cosolvent to weaken the hydrophobic interactions within a polypeptide chain and to strengthen the intramolecular hydrogen bonds between residues close to each other (39). As a result of these effects, TFE changes the conformation of various proteins, often producing the helical structure stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds (40,41). However, it is also known that the formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the presence of TFE results in the aggregates (40) or amyloid fibrils (42). These dual properties of TFE may well explain the effect of TFE to accelerate A
2M amyloid fibril extension at a neutral pH. At 20% (vol/vol) TFE, where the extension of A
2M amyloid fibrils is optimum, TFE would weaken the hydrophobic interactions within
2-m and make
2-m an amyloidogenic conformer by unfolding the tertiary structure (Figure 4). At the same time, TFE could strengthen the intermolecular hydrogen bonds between
2-m molecules in the fibrils and stabilize the extended fibrils (Figure 5). Fezoui and Teplow (43) recently reported that 20% (vol/vol) TFE converts predominantly unstructured amyloid
-peptide (A
) monomers into partially ordered, helix-containing quasi-stable conformers, resulting in a temporal decrease in the lag phase for fibril formation and a significant increase in the rate of fibril elongation. They suggested that a partially folded helix-containing conformer may be an intermediate in A
fibril assembly, and factors that affect helix formation and stability will have significant effects on the kinetics of A
fibril formation in vivo.
Chiti et al. (21,22) detected two partially unfolded species of
2-m (I1 and I2) and reported that the population of I2, which is similar to the species at an acidic pH, is significantly increased under physiologic conditions. They also demonstrated that after the denaturation of
2-m by hydrochloric acid, the population of I2 increased only transiently from 5 s to 1 to 2 min after the initiation of refolding at pH 7.3 and is involved in the extension of patient-derived amyloid fibrils during the refolding. As shown in this article, TFE at a low concentration (20% [vol/vol]) has enabled us for the first time to perform constant and stable kinetic analysis of fibril extension at a neutral pH, as well as to investigate the effect of GAG on the extension reaction.
Effect of GAG on the Extension of A
2M Amyloid Fibrils at a Neutral pH in the Presence of TFE
In this section, we consider the possible mechanism by which heparin and other GAG accelerate the extension reaction. We propose the following extension reaction of the heparin-stabilized seeds in the presence of heparin
|
|
where M is
2-m monomer, H is heparin, Pn-H and Pn+1-H are the terminals of n- and n+1-meric heparin-stabilized seeds, respectively, and Pn+1 is the newly extended terminal not stabilized by heparin. By binding to the newly extended terminal (Pn+1), heparin could reduce the depolymerization rate by stabilizing the terminal, thus promoting the extension reaction by stabilizing the newly extended terminals (Pn+2, Pn+3, Pn+4hellip;) one after another. This explanation may be consistent with the finding that in the absence of heparin, approximately 11 µM r-
2-m (44% of the initial concentration) was still in the soluble fraction after a 48-h incubation with the heparin-stabilized seeds, whereas in the presence of 200 µg/ml heparin, the concentration of r-
2-m remaining in the soluble fraction reduced to approximately 4 µM (16% of the initial concentration; Figure 7A). We cannot rule out the possibility that heparin could enhance the extension reaction by binding to monomeric
2-m. However, this interaction may not significantly contribute to the extension reaction because heparin did not change the far- and near-UV CD spectra of r-
2-m at pH 7.5 in both the presence and the absence of 20% (vol/vol) TFE (data not shown).
As shown in Figure 6, heparin, HS, DS, CSA, and CSC significantly enhanced the extension reaction in this order. The numbers of sulfate and carboxyl groups per disaccharide unit are 3-1, 2-1, 1-1, 1-1, 1-1, 1-0, and 0-1 for heparin, HS, DS, CSA, CSC, KS, and HA, respectively. Because both sulfate and carboxyl groups are negatively charged at a neutral pH, the enhancing ability of these GAG may well be correlated with the degree of the negative charge. Recently, we reported that the ability of GAG to inhibit the depolymerization of A
2M amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH may roughly be correlated with the degree of sulfation (34). Comparison of heparin with HA may clearly indicate that the heavy sulfation of the same disaccharide unit increases the enhancing ability. In addition, that the uronic acid in HA does not undergo epimerization might suggest that glucuronate-iduronate epimerization present in heparin may have some influence on the enhancing ability. Here, we report that heparin may uniformly bind to the surface of extended A
2M amyloid fibrils (Figure 7B). Because GAG constitute an extended and rigid structure, one GAG molecule would bind to the surface of the fibrils over many
2-m molecules by the electrostatic interaction between the negative charges of GAG and the positive charges of the specific residues of
2-m molecules.
Molecular Environment of A
2M Amyloid Deposition In Vivo
Various types of GAG and PG, especially HS and perlecan, have been identified in many types of human and murine amyloidosis and implicated in their development (23,24,3033,4447). Even though HS and perlecan are ubiquitously synthesized in vivo as a representative component of the basement membrane and other extracellular matrices, the predominant sites of amyloid deposition in vivo are different from each other: A
2M amyloid to be deposited in the cartilaginous and tendinous tissues (2,3,28,29), and amyloid protein A amyloid to be deposited in the spleen and kidneys (32). Although the present study may partly explain why A
2M amyloid deposition takes place predominantly in the cartilaginous and tendinous tissues, which both are rich in GAG and PG (28,29), there have to be more specific reasons for the predominant deposition in them. Furthermore, although a low concentration of TFE is needed to extend A
2M amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH in vitro, some factors that affect the conformation of
2-m and the stability of the fibrils will have significant effects on the kinetics of A
2M amyloid fibril formation in vivo.
Heparin is widely used as an anticoagulant in hemodialysis (48). Although no significant difference in the prevalence of A
2M amyloidosis was found between patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and those on hemodialysis carefully matched for time on dialysis and age at the onset of dialysis (49), the present study suggests that heparin could exert a subtle effect for the development of A
2M amyloidosis under some clinical conditions.
Finally, interference with the binding of PG and GAG to
2-m and/or A
2M amyloid fibrils in vivo may be an attractive therapeutic objective. Kisilevsky et al. (50) demonstrated that low-molecular-weight anionic sulfonate or sulfate compounds substantially reduce murine splenic amyloid protein A amyloid progression and interfere with HS-stimulated A
fibril aggregation in vitro. The experimental system described in this article should be useful for searching for the drugs that prevent the interaction of these molecules.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank H. Okada and N. Takimoto for excellent technical assistance.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 129: 701706, 1985[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin in tissue causes amyloidosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83: 79087912, 1986
2-microglobulin amyloid fibrils in peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture. Am J Pathol 141: 241247, 1992[Abstract]
2-microglobulin as the amyloidogenic protein in dialysis-amyloidosis. Kidney Int 50: 12621267, 1996[Medline]
2-microglobulin as a new form of amyloid protein in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 314: 585586, 1986[Medline]
2-Microglobulin and amyloidosis: Who is at risk? Nephrol Dial Transplant 10 [Suppl 10]: S48S51, 1995
-amyloid fibril extension in vitro. Lab Invest 74: 374383, 1996[Medline]
-amyloid fibril formation in vitro. Biochemistry 36: 62436250, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
2-Microglobulin and its deamidated variant, N17D form amyloid fibrils with a range of morphologies in vitro. J Mol Biol 313: 559571, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin-related amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH. Biochemistry 40: 84998507, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin amyloid fibril by H/D exchange. Nat Struct Biol 9: 332336, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin at neutral pH. J Biol Chem 276: 3265732662, 2001
2-microglobulin. J Mol Biol 307: 379391, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin is significantly populated under physiological conditions and involved in fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem 276: 4671446721, 2001
2-microglobulin amyloid deposits. Kidney Int 42: 915923, 1992[Medline]
2-microglobulin amyloidosis and clues for its histogenesis. Kidney Int 55: 19831990, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin amyloidosisA comparative study with systemic AA and AL amyloidosis. Virchows Arch 430: 479487, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
peptides with glycosaminoglycans: Effects on fibril nucleation and growth. Eur J Biochem 266: 11011110, 1999[Medline]
2-microglobulin amyloid fibrils in vitro. Kidney Int 64: 10801088, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
2-microglobulin is not essential for the immunoglobulin fold at neutral pH, but is essential for amyloid fibril formation at acidic pH. J Biochem 131: 4552, 2002
2M amyloid fibrils with recombinant human
2-microglobulin. Amyloid 8: 3040, 2001[Medline]
-helical structure of
-lactoglobulin: Implication for non-hierarchical protein folding. J Mol Biol 245: 180194, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
-hairpin in the OspA single-layer
-sheet. J Mol Biol 301: 477489, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
-protein fibril assembly: Differential effects of
-helix stabilization. J Biol Chem 277: 3694836954, 2002
2-microglobulin. Nephron 90: 158168, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
-amyloid proteins (A
) of Alzheimers disease, accelerates A
fibril formation, and maintains A
fibril stability. J Neurochem 69: 24522465, 1997[Medline]
2-microglobulin amyloidosis in CAPD patients compared with hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 54: 956959, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Related Article
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004 15: A14-A16.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ookoshi, K. Hasegawa, Y. Ohhashi, H. Kimura, N. Takahashi, H. Yoshida, R. Miyazaki, Y. Goto, and H. Naiki Lysophospholipids induce the nucleation and extension of {beta}2-microglobulin-related amyloid fibrils at a neutral pH Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3247 - 3255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Relini, S. De Stefano, S. Torrassa, O. Cavalleri, R. Rolandi, A. Gliozzi, S. Giorgetti, S. Raimondi, L. Marchese, L. Verga, et al. Heparin Strongly Enhances the Formation of {beta}2-Microglobulin Amyloid Fibrils in the Presence of Type I Collagen J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4912 - 4920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Relini, C. Canale, S. De Stefano, R. Rolandi, S. Giorgetti, M. Stoppini, A. Rossi, F. Fogolari, A. Corazza, G. Esposito, et al. Collagen Plays an Active Role in the Aggregation of beta2-Microglobulin under Physiopathological Conditions of Dialysis-related Amyloidosis J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16521 - 16529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kihara, E. Chatani, M. Sakai, K. Hasegawa, H. Naiki, and Y. Goto Seeding-dependent Maturation of {beta}2-Microglobulin Amyloid Fibrils at Neutral pH J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 12012 - 12018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, O. V. Galzitskaya, D. Mitomo, and J. Higo General Dynamic Properties of A{beta}12-36 Amyloid Peptide Involved in Alzheimer's Disease from Unfolding Simulation J. Biochem., November 1, 2004; 136(5): 583 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |