In vivo, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) are continuouslyexposed to mechanical cyclic stretch as a result of the pulsatileblood flow from the cardiac contractile cycle. Stretch is alteredin pathologic conditions and contributes to vascular remodelingby modulating VSMC proliferation and death. Parathyroid hormonerelatedprotein (PTHrP) is a locally produced poly-protein that regulatescell growth. It was shown previously that PTHrP inhibits VSMCproliferation through the auto/paracrine pathway by interactingwith its receptor, the PTH1R, but stimulates VSMC proliferationthrough the intracrine pathway by translocating into the nucleus.In the current study, VSMC that were isolated from both resistanceand compliance vessels were used to study the role of PTHrPin VSMC proliferation under experimental stretch. It is shownthat PTHrP gene expression is upregulated by stretch and thatPTHrP opposes the inhibitory effect induced by stretch on VSMCproliferation through the intracrine pathway. In addition, itis demonstrated that PTHrP expression is controlled at the post-transcriptionallevel by stretch. Taken together, these results strongly suggestthat PTHrP plays a critical role in the modulation of VSMC proliferationin response to stretch. Thus, in conditions in which stretchis increased, such as in hypertension or in restenosis afterangioplasty, PTHrP may contribute to vessel hyperplasia.
Blood vessels in vivo are continuously exposed to hemodynamicforces, including shear stress on the luminal surface generatedby blood flow, cyclic distension of the vascular wall, i.e.,mechanical stretch, caused by the pulsatility of the blood flow,and endocrine and local factors (e.g., angiotensin II and endothelin-1)(1). In static culture in vitro, vascular smooth muscle cells(VSMC) adopt a proliferative and dedifferentiated phenotype(1). There are conflicting data about whether stretch promotes(25) or inhibits (3,6,7) VSMC proliferation, and thisdiscrepancy has been attributed to differences in VSMC phenotype.Studies using VSMC cultured under either static or stretch conditionshave attempted to identify the mechanisms underlying the structuralalterations observed in vivo. Several regulatory pathways havebeen reported, including ion channels; cellmatrix integrininteraction; myosin isoform expression; activation of tyrosinekinases and mitogen-activated protein kinase family; and autocrineproduction and secretion of mitogenic factors such as angiotensinII, EGF, and IGF-1 or anti-mitogenic factors such as nitricoxide (38).
Parathyroid hormonerelated protein (PTHrP) acts, amongother properties, as a local regulator of cell proliferation,differentiation, and death in normal and deceased cells andtissues (9,10). PTHrP and its receptor, the PTH/PTHrP receptoror PTH-1 receptor (PTH1R), are expressed throughout the cardiovascularsystem, including the intrarenal arterial tree, in VSMC andendothelial cells (9). PTHrP expression is rapidly induced inVSMC by vasoconstrictors, growth factors, and mechanical stretch,analogous to the rapid responses of cytokine mRNA (9). PTHrPexpression is also stimulated in VSMC by pathologic stimuli,including atherosclerosis, restenosis after angioplasty, andhypertension (11). PTHrP is a potent relaxant factor in smoothmuscle of vascular and nonvascular origins in vitro and in vivo(10). We and others have shown that the kidney vasculature appearsas a privileged target for the relaxant effect of PTHrP (911).In addition to its relaxant effects, we and others have shownthat PTHrP inhibits VSMC proliferation through its interactionwith the PTH1R and stimulation of the cAMP/protein kinase Apathway resulting in cell-cycle blockade at mid-G1 (12,13).More recently, we have shown that PTHrP may also exert proliferativeeffects on VSMC by translocating into the nucleus through itsbipartite nuclear/nucleolar localization signal (bNLS) presentin the its 88 to 106 region (13). Although nuclear targets forPTHrP have not been identified, recent findings show that sequencescarboxyterminal to the bNLS are necessary for the proliferativeeffect of PTHrP in VSMC (14). It is interesting that in VSMCthat are isolated from preglomerular vessels of genetic hypertensiverats, the paradoxic effect of PTHrP on VSMC proliferation wasreversed, i.e., nuclear translocation of PTHrP led to inhibitionof VSMC proliferation (15). This was of course an importantobservation because PTHrP is overexpressed in renovascular SMCand preglomerular vessels are known to contribute greatly tothe high BP in this disease. Although no clear explanation existsto explain such effect, all of the data accumulated to datethus argue for a role for PTHrP in regulating BP and arterialwall modeling and remodeling.
Previous studies in vitro and in vivo have demonstrated thatstretch increases PTHrP expression in vascular and nonvasculartissues (1619). In aortic VSMC, stretch, either aloneor in combination with angiotensin II, results in a marked increasein the PTHrP mRNA level in a manner dependent on the strengthof stretch (16,17). A stimulatory effect of stretch on PTHrPexpression in VSMC has also been observed in various vasculardisorders, including hypertension and atherosclerosis (20,21).These observations suggest that PTHrP acts as a compliance factorin these conditions. However, the possibility that PTHrP mayalso regulate VSMC proliferation under conditions of stretchhas not been addressed. Because the kidney plays a major rolein the development and maintenance of high BP in the hypertensivestate, we used VSMC that were isolated from intrarenal arteries(resistance vessels) and compared their behavior with VSMC thatwere isolated from the aorta (compliance vessel). We now demonstratethat stretch induces PTHrP expression and that PTHrP opposesthe inhibitory effect induced by stretch on VSMC proliferationthrough the intracrine pathway. In addition, we show that stretchregulates PTHrP expression at the post-transcriptional levelby increasing PTHrP mRNA stability. Thus, under conditions inwhich stretch is increased, such as hypertension or restenosisafter angioplasty, the resultant overexpression of PTHrP maycontribute to vessel wall hyperplasia.
Human (h)PTHrP(1-36) and (Asn10, Leu11, D-Trp12)hPTHrP(7-34)amide were obtained from Bachem (Voisins-Le-Bretonneux, France).Polyclonal rabbit anti-PTHrP(34-53) antibody Ab2 and PTHrP(34-53)were from Calbiochem (France Biochem, Meudon, France). Affinity-purifiedpolyclonal rabbit anti-rat (r)PTH1R antibody (peptide IV) wasfrom Eurogentec (Angers, France). All chemicals were of thebest commercial grade available.
Animals
Animals were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (LArbresle,France). All animal studies were performed in compliance withguidelines of the European Community and the French Government.Twelve-week-old male Wistar rats that weighed 280 to 340 g andhad free access to standard food and water were anesthetizedwith ether and decapitated.
Isolation of Intrarenal Arteries and Culture of Renovascular SMC
Kidneys were removed, rinsed, and placed in ice-cold PBS. Renalarterial trees that contain mainly arcuate and interlobulararteries were isolated by the explant method followed by sievings,exactly as we detailed previously (22). Eight vascular treeswere prepared independently from eight rats. Renovascular SMC(RvSMC) were cultured, unless otherwise specified, in DMEM supplementedwith 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml)at 37°C in 10% CO2. RvSMC were used at passages 6 to 20(22).
Isolation of Aorta and Culture of Aortic SMC
Aortic VSMC (AoSMC) were obtained by an explant technique, asdetailed previously (22). Briefly, the thoracic aorta was thoroughlydissected free from connective tissue and cut longitudinally.Intimal and adventitial layers were removed, and the aorta wascut into small pieces. Eight aortic beds were prepared independentlyfrom eight rats. Aortic explants were processed as renovascularexplants and AoSMC cultured as RvSMC.
Plasmids and Stable Transfection of VSMC
Cells that were derived from one representative RvSMC and AoSMCcell line were used (see the Results section). For overexpressingPTHrP or inhibit endogenous rPTHrP expression, cells were transfectedwith a pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France) constructin which hPTHrP(1-139) cDNA had been subcloned in either a sense(pcDNA3-PTHrP) or an antisense orientation (pcDNA3-AS:PTHrP).Cells were also transfected with a pcDNA3-PTHrP construct inwhich the bNLS of PTHrP, i.e., amino acids 88 to 92 and 102to 106, was deleted by directed mutagenesis (pcDNA3-NLS:PTHrP)(13). Cells that were transfected with the empty vector pcDNA3served as controls (pcDNA3). Transfection was carried out accordingto the manufacturers protocol. Transfected cells wereselected using G418 at 75 µg/ml.
Mechanical Cyclic Stretch
Untransfected and transfected RvSMC and AoSMC cells were seededat a density of 4000 cells/cm2 onto Flex culture plates (FlexcellCorporation, McKeesport, PA) coated with rat collagen I (Sigma,St. Quentin Fallavier, France). Cells were grown for an initial48 h to allow cell attachment and spreading. Culture mediumwas replaced by DMEM supplemented with 0.1% BSA (serum-freemedium) for a second 48h period to induce quiescence. Culturemedium was then replaced by fresh medium supplemented with 10%FBS or 0.1% BSA. Cells were exposed for 4 h to 7 d to an equiaxialmechanical cyclic stretch of 10% magnitude and a frequency of1 Hz using a homemade device. RvSMC and AoSMC cells were alsogrown on Flex plates under identical conditions but were notexposed to stretch (static control).
Cell Growth
RvSMC and AoSMC cells were seeded on six-well plates at a densityof 4000 cells/cm2 and grown in serum-containing medium. Fordetermining the population doubling time (PDT), i.e., cell cycleduration at exponential growth (typically between days 2 and6), adherent cells were counted manually for 14 d using a hemocytometerat 2d intervals. For evaluating the effect of stretch on cellgrowth, untransfected or transfected RvSMC and AoSMC were processedas indicated in the stretch protocol. Adherent cells were countedat each time point using a hematocytometer.
RNA Extraction and Semiquantitative Reverse TranscriptasePCR
Total RNA was extracted from untransfected or transfected RvSMCand AoSMC cells that were grown under static or stretched conditionsusing the TRIzol method (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France)according to the manufacturers protocol. The relativeabundance of rPTHrP, hPTHrP, and rPTH1R was analyzed by reversetranscriptasePCR (RT-PCR) using rat glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase (rGAPDH) expression to normalize, exactly as describedbefore (15). Primers for rPTHrP, hPTHrP, rPTH1R, and rGAPDHhave been described previously (23). PCR products were identifiedon agarose gels by their expected size of 320 bp (rPTHrP), 535bp (hPTHrP), 508 bp (NLS-hPTHrP), 817 bp (rPTH1R), and 415 bp(rGAPDH). Control reactions were performed by omitting reversetranscriptase. Band intensities were quantified by a gel analysissoftware (Sigma Gel; Jandel Scientific, Erkrath, Germany).
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
rPTHrP cDNA was amplified using the LightCycler-FastStart DNAMaster SYBR Green kit (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France). Inaddition, a standard curve was obtained for rGAPDH by serialdilutions of mixed samples cDNA. A 20-µl mix contained4 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM each primer set, 0.2 µM SYBRGreen probe, 0.4 µM hybridization probe, 1x FastStartreaction buffer (DNA polymerase, dNTP, buffer), and 2 µlof cDNA (50 ng). PCR reactions for rPTHrP and rGAPDH were asfollows: 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles at 95°Cfor 10 s, 60°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 12 s (rPTHrP) or16 s (rGAPDH). cDNA was replaced by PCR-grade water as a negativecontrol. Each sample was run twice and quantified with the LightCycleranalysis software according to the manufacturers protocol(Roche Diagnostics). Relative expression of rPTHrP in sampleswas calculated by quantifying rPTHrP level normalized to rGAPDH,and results were expressed as a percentage of the expressionobtained at 0 h set to 100%.
PTH1R Western Blot Analysis
PTH1R expression in RvSMC and AoSMC cells was analyzed essentiallyas described (23) on 30 µg of protein extract, using ananti-PTH1R antibody (Eurogentec). A polyclonal mouse anti-actinantibody (Sigma) was used for visualization of protein gel loading.
Immunofluorescence
RvSMC and AoSMC cells were grown in glass chamber slides for48 h and processed, as detailed (13). Cells were incubated withthe polyclonal anti-PTHrP Ab2 antibody at 5 µg/ml at roomtemperature for 2 h. A FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit secondaryantibody was used for detection of the PTHrP. After final washes,cells were mounted in antifading solution (DakoCytomation, Trappes,France) and visualized with a Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) invertedfluorescence microscope. As a competition control, the primaryantibody was preincubated overnight at 4°C with 106M PTHrP(34-53) peptide. As an additional control, nonimmunerabbit IgG (Sigma) was used instead of primary antibody.
PTHrP Promoter Activity Measurement
RvSMC and AoSMC cells were seeded at 4000 cells/cm2 in Flexplates and grown for 48 h in serum-containing medium. Culturemedium was replaced by serum-free medium for 48 h to inducequiescence. Cells then were transiently transfected with a constructthat contained the 5'-flanking promoter regions (promoters P1,P2, and P3) of the hPTHrP gene ligated to a promoterless bacterialchloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene (24). Transfectionwas carried out with 1 µg/cm2 of the PTHrP promoter CATplasmid or the promoterless CAT plasmid, using the Lipofectaminereagent. RvSMC and AoSMC cells were then grown for 48 h in serum-freemedium under static or stretched conditions and analyzed forCAT enzyme expression using the CAT enzyme ELISA kit (RocheDiagnostics). Results were normalized and expressed as pg CATenzyme/mg protein.
Actinomycin D Experiments
RvSMC and AoSMC cells were plated as above. Cells were thengrown for 0 to 8 h in serum-free medium under static or stretchedconditions in the presence or absence of 5 µg/ml actinomycinD (Sigma). Total RNA was isolated at each time point, and PTHrPexpression was analyzed by RT-PCR using rGAPDH for normalization.The relative intensity of the PTHrP mRNA signal (rPTHrP/rGAPDHratio) in each lane was then expressed as a percentage of thesignal obtained at the time of actinomycin D addition (0 h)set to 100%.
Statistical Analyses
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Values were comparedusing multifactorial ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keulstest for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Growth Characteristic of RvSMC and AoSMC
Growth of RvSMC and AoSMC expressed as PDT were studied on eightindependent rat vascular explants. RvSMC grew more slowly thanAoSMC (41.5 ± 4 h in RvSMC versus 24.3 ± 1.3 hin AoSMC, n = 7; P < 0.01), as previously observed (22).Subsequent experiments were performed on RvSMC and AoSMC derivedfrom one representative explant, exhibiting a PDT value comparableto the overall mean value (42 h for RvSMC and 23.7 h for AoSMC;Figure 1).
Figure 1. Population doubling time (PDT) of smooth muscle cells that were isolated from renal arterial trees (RvSMC) and aorta (AoSMC) of Wistar rats. , mean PDT value of RvSMC and AoSMC cell lines; , PDT value of the RvSMC and AoSMC cell lines that were selected for subsequent analysis. *P < 0.05, RvSMC versus AoSMC; n = 8.
Mechanical Cyclic Stretch Inhibits RvSMC and AoSMC Proliferation
In serum-containing medium, proliferation of SMC from both originswas significantly decreased by stretch (Figure 2). Two effectswere observed: First, a 2d delay in cell proliferation and,second, a significant lower cell density at plateau phase (Figure 2).In serum-free medium, cells did not proliferate regardlessof vessel origin or stretch status.
Figure 2. Effect of 10% mechanical stretch on RvSMC (A) and AoSMC (B) proliferation. Cells were seeded at 4000 cells/cm2 onto Flex culture plates and submitted to a 10% elongation in either the presence (10% FBS) or the absence (0.1% BSA) of serum after a 48-h period of quiescence. Adherent cells were counted at the indicated time points. In the absence of serum, cells were not proliferating. In the presence of serum, stretch induced an inhibitory effect on cell proliferation regardless of SMC origins. Note the lower plateau phase obtained in cells that were submitted to stretch. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 in the absence of serum and n = 10 in the presence of 10% FBS). *P < 0.01 stretch versus static cells.
Mechanical Cyclic Stretch Stimulates PTHrP Expression in RvSMC and AoSMC
In serum-containing medium, induction of PTHrP expression bystretch was evident in RvSMC beginning at 24 h and was maintainedfor at least 96 h (Figure 3A). We confirmed the stimulatoryeffect of stretch on PTHrP expression for the 24 h time pointat the mRNA level by quantitative analysis (Figure 3B) and atthe protein level by immunofluorescence (Figure 3C). It is interestingthat in serum-free medium, a significant increase in PTHrP expressionwas also observed after 24 h of stretch at both mRNA (Figure 3A)and protein (data not shown) levels. In contrast, PTH1Rexpression was decreased by stretch at both mRNA (Figure 3D)and protein (Figure 3E) levels at all time points, reflectingprobably an inhibitory effect of upregulated PTHrP on PTH1Rexpression. Similar results were obtained in AoSMC cells (datanot shown).
Figure 3. Effect of 10% mechanical stretch on parathyroid hormonerelated protein (PTHrP) and rPTH1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Semiquantitative reverse transcriptasePCR (RT-PCR) analysis of rPTHrP (320 bp) in RvSMC that were grown under stretched or static conditions at the various time points indicated. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 415 bp) expression was used as the housekeeping gene for semiquantification of PTHrP expression. Shown is a representative ethidium bromidestained agarose gel from at least three experiments. Stretch increases PTHrP expression at all time points tested. It is interesting that in the absence of serum (0.1% BSA), PTHrP expression was also increased by stretch after 24 h. (B) Bars represent a real-time PCR quantification of the PTHrP transcript in RvSMC at 0 and 24 h grown under static (0 and 24) or stretch (24S) conditions in the presence of serum. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 4). *P < 0.05 in 24S versus 0 and 24. (C) Immunofluorescence micrographs showing PTHrP upregulation in RvSMC in response to stretch. RvSMC were grown for 24 h under either static (upper two micrographs) or stretched (lower two micrographs) conditions and immunostained for PTHrP. Results confirmed the stimulatory effect of stretch on PTHrP expression at the protein level. (D) RT-PCR analysis of PTH1R (817 bp) and GAPDH expression in RvSMC that were grown under stretched or static conditions at the various time points indicated. In contrast to PTHrP, PTH1R expression was decreased by stretch. Shown is a representative agarose gel from at least three experiments. (E) A typical immunoblot of the PTH1R protein in RvSMC that were grown for 24 h under either static or stretch conditions showing the stretch-induced decrease in PTH1R expression. Shown is a representative immunoblot from four experiments.
PTHrP Opposes the Inhibitory Effect Induced by Mechanical Cyclic Stretch on RvSMC and AoSMC Proliferation
As shown in Figure 4A, transfections with pcDNA3-PTHrP and pcDNA3-AS:PTHrPconstructs were highly efficient in increasing or inhibitingPTHrP expression, respectively, consistent with previous resultsobtained in VSMC (13). Decreasing PTHrP expression with theAS:PTHrP construct did not affect RvSMC growth under staticor stretched conditions (Figure 4B). However, in RvSMC thatwere transfected with the sense PTHrP construct, while the delayin cell proliferation was maintained in stretched cells, theplateau phase was no longer different between cells that weregrown in static versus stretch conditions (Figure 4C). Thatno effect was observed in RvSMC that were transfected with theAS:PTHrP construct on cell proliferation under stretch conditiontherefor ise unexpected but, as shown in Figure 4D, may be relatedto the incomplete effectiveness of the AS:PTHrP transfectionto decrease stretch-induced PTHrP upregulation. Similar datawere obtained in AoSMC (data not shown).
Figure 4. Stretch-induced PTHrP opposes the inhibitory effect of stretch on VSMC proliferation. (A) RT-PCR analysis of rPTHrP (left; 320 bp), hPTHrP (right; 535 bp), and GAPDH expression in RvSMC that were transfected with the PTHrP antisense construct (pcDNA3-AS:PTHrP; AS) or the PTHrP sense construct (pcDNA3-PTHrP; PrP) constructs or pcDNA3 alone (V). Shown are representative ethidium bromidestained agarose gels from at least three experiments. (B) The graph shows proliferation of vector (pcDNA3) or PTHrP antisense construct (pcDNA3-AS:PTHrP)-transfected RvSMC that were grown in static or stretch condition during the indicated time. Transfection with the AS construct did not affect cell proliferation whether they were stretched or not. For clarity, results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) calculated from the cell density obtained after 5 d in static condition that was set to 100%. *P < 0.01 stretch versus static RvSMC. (C) The graph shows proliferation of vector (pcDNA3) and PTHrP sense construct (pcDNA3-AS:PTHrP)-transfected RvSMC that were grown in static or stretch condition during the indicated time. As in B, results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5) calculated from the cell density obtained after 5 d in static condition that was set to 100%. In RvSMC that were transfected with PTHrP, proliferation of stretched cells was no longer inhibited. (D) RT-PCR analysis of rPTHrP and GAPDH expression in RvSMC that were transfected with the PTHrP antisense construct (AS) or the vector alone (V) submitted to a 24-h stretch period. AS 0 represents level of rPTHrP expression in cells that were transfected with the PTHrP antisense construct grown under static condition. Under stretch, the PTHrP antisense construct was less efficient in inhibiting PTHrP expression, which went up to 50% of the level seen in vector-transfected RvSMC. Shown is a representative agarose gel from at least three experiments.
PTHrP Acts through on Intracrine Pathway to Oppose the Inhibitory Effect Induced by Mechanical Cyclic Stretch on VSMC Proliferation
PTHrP was detected in the nucleus of PTHrP-transfected RvSMC(Figure 5A). PTHrP was also present in nontransfected cellsand in cells that were transfected with the vector alone orwith the pcDNA3-NLS:PTHrP construct, although in a lower percentageof cells (data not shown), consistent with previous findingsin VSMC (13). As shown in Figure 5B, transfection with the pcDNA3-NLS:PTHrPconstruct was highly efficient but did not affect RvSMC growthunder static or stretched conditions (Figure 5C). Furthermore,the continuous exposure of untransfected RvSMC to a high doseof either PTHrP(1-36) (Figure 5D) or (Asn10, Leu11, D-Trp12)hPTHrP(7-34)amide (Figure 5E), a potent RPTH1 antagonist, did not modifytheir proliferation, whether they were stretched or not. Similardata were obtained in AoSMC (data not shown).
Figure 5. PTHP acts through the intracrine pathway to oppose the inhibitory effect of stretch on VSMC proliferation. (A) Immunofluorescent staining of RvSMC that were transfected with the PTHrP sense construct (pcDNA3-PTHrP) showing cytoplasmic and nuclear staining of PTHrP. (B) RT-PCR analysis of hPTHrP expression and GAPDH in nontransfected RvSMC (Ctl) and in RvSMC that were transfected with the PTHrP sense construct (pcDNA3-PTHrP; PrP; 535 bp) or the NLS-deleted PTHrP construct (pcDNA3-NLS:PTHrP; NLS; 508 bp) or pcDNA3 alone (V). Shown is a representative ethidium bromidestained agarose gel from at least three experiments. (C) The graph shows proliferation of vector (pcDNA3) and NLS-deleted PTHrP construct (pcDNA3-NLS:PTHrP)-transfected RvSMC that were grown in static or stretch condition during the indicated time. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5 to 6) calculated from the cell density obtained after 5 d in static condition that was set to 100%. Transfection with this construct did not affect cell proliferation whether they were stretched or not. (D and E) RvSMC were continuously exposed to exogenous PTHrP(1-36) at 107 M (D) or (Asn10, Leu11, D-Trp12)hPTHrP(7-34) amide (E) and grown under static or stretch condition, and cell density was measured at the indicated time points. The continuous presence of high dose of the PTH1R agonist or antagonist did not affect cell proliferation whether they were stretched or not. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 10) calculated from the cell density obtained after 4 d in static condition that was set to 100%. *P < 0.01 stretch versus static RvSMC. Magnification, x400 in A.
Mechanical Cyclic Stretch Stimulates PTHrP Expression through mRNA Stabilization
Further studies were performed to gain insight into the mechanismaccounting for stretch-induced PTHrP expression. Because angiotensinII has been shown first to control PTHrP expression (25) inVSMC and second to be induced in VSMC submitted to an experimentalstretch (26,27), we first tested the hypothesis that angiotensinII is involved in stretch-induced PTHrP upregulation. The PTHrPexpression profile in response to stretch remained unchangedin the presence of 107 M losartan, an angiotensin IIreceptor antagonist (Figure 6A), ruling out the involvementof angiotensin II in PTHrP expression.
Figure 6. Mechanism of stretch-induced PTHrP expression. (A) RT-PCR analysis of rPTHrP and GAPDH expression in RvSMC that were grown under stretch or static condition in the presence or absence of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan at the various time points indicated. PTHrP expression profile was not altered by the presence of the angiotensin II antagonist. (B) Bars represent chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression in RvSMC that were transiently transfected with an hPTHrP promoter CAT expression plasmid. Stretch did not alter PTHrP promoter activity. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). (C) Increase in rPTHrP mRNA stability in RvSMC that were grown under stretch condition as compared with cells that were grown in static condition. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.01 stretch versus static RvSMC. Representative agarose gels are shown at the top right for static and stretched RvSMC.
As shown in Figure 6B, hPTHrP transcriptional activity in RvSMCwas not altered by stretch. However, analysis of the decay ofthe rPTHrP mRNA in RvSMC that were exposed to the transcriptionalinhibitor actinomycin D revealed that PTHrP half-life is significantlyincreased in RvSMC in response to stretch (2.9 ± 0.3and 6.5 ± 1.4 h in RvSMC grown in static versus stretchconditions, respectively; n = 3; *P < 0.01; Figure 6C). Similardata were obtained in AoSMC (data not shown).
The luminal surface of blood vessels is lined with endothelialcells so that shear stress is predominantly sensed by and actson endothelial cells. However, both endothelial cells and VSMCare subjected to cyclic stretch. In normal conditions, VSMCare quiescent and contractile (1). In response to pathologicstress, such as a sustained elevation in BP, VSMC develop aproliferative, hypertrophic, and secretory phenotype (1). Thesealterations result in vascular remodeling characterized by cellularhyperplasia, hypertrophy, apoptosis, enhanced protein synthesis,and extracellular matrix reorganization.
There are conflicting data about whether stretch inhibits orstimulates VSMC proliferation (27). Thus, for example,Chapman et al. (6) showed that cyclic stretch causes cell-cyclearrest at the G1/S phase transition in VSMC by increasing theexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21. Incontrast, Iwasaki et al. (4) demonstrated that mechanical stretchstimulates VSMC growth via the EGF receptor. In both cases,VSMC were isolated from the rat thoracic aorta, but in one study(6), cells were obtained by collagenase dispersion and in theother (4) by the explant method. Although different cell isolationmethods could explain divergent results, this is not corroboratedby the above-mentioned study (6) and another study (5). Anotherpossibility is that the level of stretch applied to VSMC invitro will direct the cell growth response to the stretch stimulus.However, opposed effects have been reported on VSMC growth incells that were submitted to physiologic stretch (10% elongation)as well as in cells that were exposed to supraphysiologic stretch(15 to 25% elongation) (37,2628). The most plausiblehypothesis to explain these conflicting results is the differencein phenotype between VSMC. Such variability in VSMC phenotypesbetween different vessels and within the same vessel has beenconfirmed by many studies (29,30). In addition, the heterogeneousnature of VSMC developmental origin provides another level ofcomplexity in VSMC growth mechanisms (30). In the current study,we used VSMC that were isolated from both resistance and compliancevessels. We show that the effect of stretch on VSMC proliferationis in fact more complex than previously reported. Indeed, VSMCrespond to stretch by a first delay in cell proliferation. Inour condition, this delay lasted 2 d in both RvSMC and AoSMC.Cells then proliferate, but cell density reached at plateauphase by cells that were grown under stretch condition was lowerthan in static condition. In static conditions, VSMC stoppedgrowing after reaching confluence. In additional pilot experiments,we obtained similar results when cells were submitted to a supraphysiologicstretch (20% elongation; data not shown). However, because suchlevel of stretch resulted in a large amount of cell detachment,further studies were performed at 10% elongation for which celldetachment was not observed. Because cell density was higherin cells that were grown in static condition as compared withcells that were grown under stretch condition, the lower plateauphase reached by stretched cells cannot be due to medium impoverishmentor contact inhibition but most probably to a cell growth arrestappearing before confluence.
The diversity in VSMC response to stretch reflects and is reflectedby the various mechanisms that have been evidenced in specificstudies in vitro. From previous data, we hypothesize that PTHrPmight belong to the family of growth factors that regulate stretch-dependentVSMC growth. Our findings in VSMC that were derived from bothresistance and capacitance vessels confirm earlier results ofa stretch-induced increase in PTHrP expression at both mRNAand protein levels in VSMC from different vessel and species(including human) origins. However, we show here that the stretch-inducedPTHrP expression in VSMC is long-lasting, lasting at least 96h. Using RvSMC and AoSMC that were stably transfected with variousPTHrP constructs, our finding is that PTHrP opposes the inhibitoryeffect induced by stretch on VSMC proliferation through theintracrine pathway. In PTHrP-transfected cells, there was nodifference in cell density at plateau phase whether they werestretched or not, suggesting that the nuclear presence of PTHrPstimulates cell-cycle progression. Because PTHrP has been hypothesizedto bind homopolymeric and total cellular RNA (31), the hypothesishas emerged that PTHrP might regulate RNA metabolism and particularlygene transcription. However, such a property for PTHrP has notbeen confirmed. The results described here should now help notonly to identify other nuclear targets for PTHrP but also todecrypt the molecular mechanism of PTHrP-induced VSMC proliferation.
In response to stretch, several intracellular signaling pathwaysare activated and eventually result in increased transcriptionof genes that harbor "stretch-response elements" in their promoters.These include transcription factors such as c-fos and c-jun,increasing the activity of the AP-1 transcription complex (2,24,32,33).As a consequence, genes that bear AP-1 binding sites in their5' regulatory sequence may also be stimulated. Although it isactually unknown whether the PTHrP gene contains a stretch-responsiveelement, AP-1 and AP-2 binding sites are present in its 5' region.However, our experiments indicate that stretch does not alterPTHrP gene transcription but doubles PTHrP mRNA half-life. Furtherstudy is required to resolve the exact molecular mechanismsby which the stretch enhances
PTHrP mRNA stability.
Taken together, our studies argue for a critical role for PTHrPin the growth control processes in response to stretch in VSMC.Our results should provide new avenues in the comprehensionof the molecular pathways involved in vascular wall homeostasisin normal and pathologic conditions.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the French National Institutof Health and Medical research (INSERM) and the University LouisPasteur. This work is part of the PhD thesis of E.S., who issupported by a fellowship from the French Ministry of highereducation.
Birukov KG, Shirinsky VP, Stepanova OV, Tkachuk VA, Hahn AW, Resink TJ, Smirnov VN: Stretch affects phenotype and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem 144: 131139, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
Chapman GB, Durante W, Hellums JD, Schafer AI: Physiological cyclic stretch causes cell cycle arrest in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: 748754, 2000
Hipper A, Isenberg G: Cyclic mechanical strain decreases the DNA synthesis of vascular smooth muscle cells. Pflugers Arch 440: 1927, 2000[Medline]
Osol G: Mechanotransduction by vascular smooth muscle. J Vasc Res 32: 275292, 1995[Medline]
Massfelder T, Helwig JJ: Parathyroid hormone-related protein in cardiovascular development and blood pressure regulation. Endocrinology 140: 15071510, 1999[Free Full Text]
Massfelder T, Fiaschi-Taesch N, Stewart AF, Helwig JJ: Parathyroid hormone-related peptideA smooth muscle tone and proliferation regulatory protein. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 7: 2732, 1998[Medline]
Massfelder T, Helwig JJ: The parathyroid hormone-related protein system: More data but more unsolved questions. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 12: 3542, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
Stuart WD, Maeda S, Khera P, Fagin JA, Clemens TL: Parathyroid hormone-related protein induces G1 phase growth arrest of vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 279: 6067, 2000
Massfelder T, Dann P, Wu TL, Vasavada R, Helwig JJ, Stewart AF: Opposing mitogenic and anti-mitogenic actions of parathyroid hormone-related protein in vascular smooth muscle cells: A critical role for nuclear targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 1363013635, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
de Miguel F, Fiaschi-Taesch N, Lopez-Talavera JC, Takane KK, Massfelder T, Helwig JJ, Stewart AF: The C-terminal region of PTHrP, in addition to the nuclear localization signal, is essential for the intracrine stimulation of proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Endocrinology 142: 40964105, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Massfelder T, Taesch N, Endlich N, Eichinger A, Escande B, Endlich K, Barthelmebs M, Helwig JJ: Paradoxical actions of exogenous and endogenous parathyroid hormone-related protein on renal vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: Reversion in the SHR model of genetic hypertension. FASEB J 15: 707718, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Noda M, Katoh T, Takuwa N, Kumada M, Kurokawa K, Takuwa Y: Synergistic stimulation of parathyroid hormone-related peptide gene expression by mechanical stretch and angiotensin II in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 269: 1791117917, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Pirola CJ, Wang HM, Strgacich MI, Kamyar A, Cercek B, Forrester JS, Clemens TL, Fagin JA: Mechanical stimuli induce vascular parathyroid hormone-related protein gene expression in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology 134: 22302236, 1994[Abstract]
Daifotis AG, Weir EC, Dreyer BE, Broadus AE: Stretch-induced parathyroid hormone-related peptide gene expression in the rat uterus. J Biol Chem 267: 2345523458, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Thiede MA, Harm SC, McKee RL, Grasser WA, Duong LT, Leach RM Jr: Expression of the parathyroid hormone-related protein gene in the avian oviduct: Potential role as a local modulator of vascular smooth muscle tension and shell gland motility during the egg-laying cycle. Endocrinology 129: 19581966, 1991[Abstract]
Noda M, Katoh T, Kurokawa K, Takuwa Y: Increased expression of parathyroid hormone-related peptide gene in blood vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 30: 12841288, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nakayama T, Ohtsuru A, Enomoto H, Namba H, Ozeki S, Shibata Y, Yokota T, Nobuyoshi M, Ito M, Sekine I, et al: Coronary atherosclerotic smooth muscle cells overexpress human parathyroid hormone-related peptides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200: 10281035, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
Endlich N, Endlich K, Taesch N, Helwig JJ: Culture of vascular smooth muscle cells from small arteries of the rat kidney. Kidney Int 57: 24682475, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Massfelder T, Taesch N, Fritsch S, Eichinger A, Barthelmebs M, Stewart AF, Helwig JJ: Type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor expression level modulates renal tone and plasma renin activity in spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 639648, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Massfelder T, Lang H, Schordan E, Lindner V, Rothhut S, Welsch S, Simon-Assmann P, Barthelmebs M, Jacqmin D, Helwig JJ: Parathyroid hormone-related protein is an essential growth factor for human clear cell renal carcinoma and a target for the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene. Cancer Res 64: 180188, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Pirola CJ, Wang HM, Kamyar A, Wu S, Enomoto H, Sharifi B, Forrester JS, Clemens TL, Fagin JA: Angiotensin II regulates parathyroid hormone-related protein expression in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. J Biol Chem 268: 19871994, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Li Q, Muragaki Y, Ueno H, Ooshima A: Stretch-induced proliferation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and a possible involvement of local renin-angiotensin system and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Hypertens Res 20: 217223, 1997[Medline]
Hosokawa H, Aiuchi S, Kambe T, Hagiwara Y, Kubo T: Mechanical stretch-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation is mediated via angiotensin and endothelin systems in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biol Pharm Bull 25: 15881592, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
Sedding DG, Seay U, Fink L, Heil M, Kummer W, Tillmanns H, Braun-Dullaeus RC: Mechanosensitive p27Kip1 regulation and cell cycle entry in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation 108: 616622, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bochaton-Piallat ML, Ropraz P, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G: Phenotypic heterogeneity of rat arterial smooth muscle cell clones. Implications for the development of experimental intimal thickening. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16: 815820, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nakamura A, Isoyama S, Watanabe T, Katoh M, Sawai T: Heterogeneous smooth muscle cell population derived from small and larger arteries. Microvasc Res 55: 1428, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Aarts MM, Levy D, He B, Stregger S, Chen T, Richard S, Henderson JE: Parathyroid hormone-related protein interacts with RNA. J Biol Chem 274: 48324838, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lyall F, Deehan MR, Greer IA, Boswell F, Brown WC, McInnes GT: Mechanical stretch increases proto-oncogene expression and phosphoinositide turnover in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens 12: 11391145, 1994[Medline]
Tamura K, Chen YE, Lopez-Ilasaca M, Daviet L, Tamura N, Ishigami T, Akishita M, Takasaki I, Tokita Y, Pratt RE, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ, Umemura S: Molecular mechanism of fibronectin gene activation by cyclic stretch in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 275: 3461934627, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication May 3, 2004.
Accepted for publication August 27, 2004.
Related Article
This Months Highlights
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004 15: 2955-2958.
[Full Text][PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
F. Meziani, A. Tesse, S. Welsch, H. Kremer, M. Barthelmebs, R. Andriantsitohaina, F. Schneider, and A. Gairard Expression and Biological Activity of Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide in Pregnant Rat Uterine Artery: Any Role for 8-Iso-Prostaglandin F2{alpha}?
Endocrinology,
February 1, 2008;
149(2):
626 - 633.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. Welsch, E. Schordan, C. Coquard, T. Massfelder, N. Fiaschi-Taesch, J.-J. Helwig, and M. Barthelmebs Abnormal Renovascular Parathyroid Hormone-1 Receptor in Hypertension: Primary Defect or Secondary to Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Activation?
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2006;
147(9):
4384 - 4391.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]