Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerjaschki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Raab, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerjaschki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Raab, I.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
J Am Soc Nephrol 15:603-612, 2004
© 2004 American Society of Nephrology


BASIC SCIENCE

Lymphatic Neoangiogenesis in Human Kidney Transplants Is Associated with Immunologically Active Lymphocytic Infiltrates

Dontscho Kerjaschki*, Heinrich M. Regele*, Isabella Moosberger*, Katalyn Nagy-Bojarski*, Bruno Watschinger{dagger}, Afschin Soleiman*, Peter Birner*, Sigurd Krieger*, Anny Hovorka*, Georg Silberhumer{ddagger}, Pirjo Laakkonen§, Tatiana Petrova§, Brigitte Langer* and Ingrid Raab*

Departments of *Pathology, {dagger}Internal Medicine III, and {ddagger}Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria; and §Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence to Dontscho Kerjaschki, Department of Pathology, University of Vienna-Allgemeines Krankenhaus, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43-1-40400 5176; Fax: 43-1-40400 5193; E-mail: dontscho.kerjaschki{at}akh-wien.ac.at


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. Renal transplant rejection is caused by a lymphocyte-rich inflammatory infiltrate that attacks cortical tubules and endothelial cells. Immunosuppressive therapy reduces the number of infiltrating cells; however, their exit routes are not known. Here a >50-fold increase of lymphatic vessel density over normal kidneys in grafts with nodular mononuclear infiltrates is demonstrated by immunohistochemistry on human renal transplant biopsie susing antibodies to the lymphatic endothelial marker protein podoplanin. Nodular infiltrates are constantly associated with newly formed, Ki-67–expressing lymphatic vessels and contain the entire repertoire of T and B lymphocytes to provide specific cellular and humoral alloantigenic immune responses, including Ki-67+ CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, S100+ dendritic cells, and Ki-67+CD20+ B lymphocytes and {lambda}- and {kappa}-chain-expressing plasmacytoid cells. Numerous chemokine receptor CCR7+ cells within the nodular infiltrates seemed to be attracted by secondary lymphatic chemokine (SLC/CCL21) that is produced and released by lymphatic endothelial cells in a complex with podoplanin. From these results, it is speculated that lymphatic neoangiogenesis not only contributes to the export of the rejection infiltrate but also is involved in the maintenance of a potentially detrimental alloreactive immune response in renal transplants and provides a novel therapeutic target.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transplantation and chronic dialysis are life-saving renal replacement therapies that, however, are associated not only with human suffering but also with substantial financial burdens (1). The function of grafted kidneys is imperiled by rejection reactions that are mediated by massive invasion of alloreactive mononuclear recipient cells into the cortical stroma and destruction of tubules and/or endothelial cells. Aggressive, unselective immunosuppressive therapy usually results in rapid clinical improvement of the transplant function; however, each acute rejection episode leaves a permanent mark on the graft’s function (2). Poorly defined, persistent low-grade alloimmune responses are thought to continue during the entire life span of the graft and eventually contribute to the multifaceted process of chronic transplant rejection that is currently the major cause for long-term graft failure and is out of reach of therapy (3). Thus, detailed knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that determine influx and disappearance of the rejection infiltrate and the site(s) and mechanisms of continuous immune responses is required to design therapeutic strategies specifically targeted at the recurrence of acute rejection and development of chronic rejection.

Acute interstitial rejection is accurately defined as a special form of inflammation, with a mixed infiltrate of mononuclear inflammatory cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, macrophages) that invade the cortical tubulointerstitial spaces (4). Despite many years of experience with transplant biopsies, little is known about the kinetics of infiltrate clearing after immunosuppressive therapy, and it is possible that nodular infiltrates of mononuclear cells in the cortical stroma are residues of the diffuse infiltrate found in acute rejection. Disappearance of the rejection infiltrate is in part due to apoptosis that occurs in the renal cortex at a rate similar to that in the thymus (5). However, even this relatively high apoptotic rate is obviously too low to account for the disappearance of inflammatory infiltrate cells after immunosuppressive treatment, thus demanding additional mechanisms of elimination. This has raised the possibility that, similar to other inflamed tissues, cortical lymphatic vessels could serve as exit routes (6), as suggested by previous studies in experimental renal transplant rejection in which lymphatic vessels drained large amounts of fluid and mononuclear cells (7). Therefore, we investigated here the distribution and local density of lymphatic vessels and their topographic relation to the rejection infiltrate in acute rejection, taking advantage of recently developed specific markers for lymphatic endothelial cells (8). We chose to examine biopsies and explants from human renal transplants rather than experimental models that only imperfectly mirror the course of rejection and its corresponding morphologic features in humans.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Selection of Renal Tissues
All renal biopsies were performed as diagnostic standard procedure for classification, staging, and grading of clinical allograft rejection. Biopsies were routinely fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin, and the sections were classified according to the Banff nomenclature. In a preliminary screen of 350 archival biopsies performed from 1999 to the end of 2002, 35 cases that contained podoplanin-positive lymphatic vessels and nodular infiltrates were selected. An additional selection criterion was the availability of enough renal tissue in the paraffin blocks to perform further experiments. Furthermore, paraffin-embedded and frozen tissues of six renal explants were examined. Samples of six normal renal cortices from tumor nephrectomies, six cases with acute interstitial rejection, and four with vascular rejection were collected. Basic clinical data are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Patients and classification of rejectiona
 
Reagents
Rabbit antibodies were raised against the glycosylated ectodomain of human podoplanin recombinantly expressed in 293 human kidney cells (ATCC CRL-1573). This antigen was also used to raise monoclonal antibodies, as described (9). Rabbit antibodies to human LYVE-1 and Prox-1 were obtained from Dr. Kari Alitalo (University of Helsinki). For immunohistochemical detection of protein expression, antibodies with the following specificities were used: VEGF-C (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA); vascular endothelial growth factoC (VEGF-C) 15-meric peptide (VEGF-C amino acids 260 to 274) prepared with an automated peptide synthesizer (Model 430A; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA); CD1, CD2, CD3, CD8, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD23, CD34, CD45, CD45RA, CD56, CD68, CD123, and HLA-DR (all from Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ); VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) and VEGF-D (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); and recombinant SLC/CCL21 (B&D Research, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

Immunohistochemical Localization of Lymphatic Vessels
Localization of lymphatic vessels in paraffin or frozen sections was performed with purified rabbit anti-podoplanin IgG (5 µg/ml) or mouse monoclonal anti-podoplanin IgG (1 µg/ml), using a biotin–streptavidin–horseradish-peroxidase method, as described (10). The lymphatic vessel density was quantified as number of podoplanin-positive vascular profiles per medium-power field (MPF; median lymphatic vascular density [MLVD], 20x objective). Typically, 10 to 20 fields per biopsy were evaluated. As renal tissue cores are compressed by the biopsy procedure, no attempt was made to record the size and patency of lymphatic vessels. For confirming the identification of lymphatic vessels, indirect double immunofluorescence on acetone-fixed cryostat sections of renal explants was performed with primary antibodies specific for podoplanin and Prox-1 or with LYVE-1. Alexa 488– and Alexa 633–labeled secondary antibodies were used (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and triple-channel confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed with a ZEISS LSM 510, as described (10).

Double and Triple Immunohistochemistry
These methods were performed on 2-µm sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival biopsies or renal explants that were classified for diagnostic purposes according to the Banff nomenclature, as described (10, 11). As immunohistochemical controls, the primary antibodies were omitted.

Immunoelectron Microscopy
Segments of biopsy cores were fixed in a mixture of 4% formaldehyde and 0.2% distilled glutaraldehyde in 20 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 6 to 12 h, the blocks were embedded in Lowicryl-K4M resin (Polysciences, Warrington, PA), and sections were immunolabeled with rabbit anti-podoplanin IgG and 10 nm of gold conjugated to sheep anti-rabbit IgG, as described (12). Double immunogold labeling was performed by incubation of the ultrathin sections in a first step with rabbit anti-podoplanin IgG and 10 nm of sheep-anti rabbit IgG gold conjugate and in a second layer with mouse monoclonal anti-SCL/CCL21 IgG, followed by 5 nm of gold sheep anti-mouse IgG conjugate. As positive controls, rabbit and monoclonal murine antibodies to podocalyxin were used. As negative controls, primary antibodies were omitted.

Surface Plasmon-Resonance Analysis of SLC/CCL21 Binding to Podoplanin and Competition with Heparin
The binding of a podoplanin receptorglobuin, composed from a human Fc-domain and the glycosylated ectodomain of podoplanin and expressed in 293 human fibroblasts, was studied by surface plasmon-resonance analysis on a BiaCore 2000 instrument (BiaCore AB, Uppsala, Sweden), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, BiaCore sensor chips, type CM5, were activated with a 1:1 mixture of 0.2 M N-ethyl-N'-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)carbodiimide and 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccinimide in water. Podoplanin ectodomain fusion protein was purified by Protein-G affinity chromatography and yielded a single band by SDS-PAGE. The protein was immobilized at concentrations up to 50 ng/ml in 10 mM Na acetate (pH 4.5), and the remaining binding sites were blocked with 1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.5). The resulting densities were 1500 RU fusion protein/mm2. In some experiments, unglycosylated GSP-receptorglobulin was expressed in Escherichia coli, purified by affinity chromatography, and similarly immobilized. A control flow cell was made by performing the activation and blocking procedures only. Recombinant SCL/CCL21 was dissolved in sample running buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, and 0.005% Tween 20). In competition experiments, 1 to 3000 ng of heparin was included in the incubation buffer. In some experiments, the chips were coated with bacterially expressed unglycosylated podoplanin ectodomain-Fc fusion protein. Regeneration of sensor chips after each analysis was performed with 1.6 M glycine-HCl buffer (pH 3.0). The BiaCore response is expressed in relative response units, i.e., the difference in response between protein and control flow channel. Kinetic parameters were determined by use of BIAevaluation software.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Distribution of Lymphatic Vessels in Normal Kidney Cortex
Podoplanin distinctly labels lymphatic vessels that follow the larger intrarenal branches of the renal artery, to the level of interlobular arteries, but not further, and lymphatics were encountered neither in the peritubular spaces nor in proximity to glomeruli (Figure 1).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. (A) Survey view of a renal transplant that contains an artery (Art) and a vein (V) in the center. Numerous podoplanin-expressing lymphatic capillaries and larger caliber vessels are found within and around nodular mononuclear stromal infiltrates (arrows and N), and also reaching deep into the tubulointerstitial stroma. G, glomerulus. (B) In a normal human kidney, podoplanin-labeled lymphatic vessels are confined to the periarterial stroma and do not branch out into the tubulointerstitial space. (C) A lymphatic vessel in a transplanted kidney is labeled both by antibodies to podoplanin (left) and by LYVE-1 (middle) in good overlap (merged pictures at right) by double immunofluorescence. (D) A lymphatic vessel in a transplant is labeled by antibodies to podoplanin (left) and its nuclei by anti–Prox-1 antibodies (middle). When the pictures are merged (right), a perfect fit of the nuclei into the podoplanin-positive endothelial cell body confirms further the identity of the vessel as lymphatic. (E through H) Examples of lymphatic endothelial cells coexpressing podoplanin (brown) and the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (blue, arrowheads). (I) A lymphatic vessel expresses podoplanin (brown) and contains numerous CD2+ cells (blue). (J) Histogram showing the average lymphatic vessel density/middle-power field (y axis) in normal kidneys (left), in acute rejection and diffuse inflammatory infiltrate (middle), and in association with nodular mononuclear infiltrates (right). Magnifications: x200 in A; x250 in B; x500 in C, D, and I; x400 in E through H.

 
De Novo Formation of Lymphatic Vessels in Transplants
In a first survey, 350 unselected recent archival renal biopsies and graft explants were screened for the presence of nodular infiltrates and immunostained for podoplanin-expressing lymphatic vessels. This exploratory study surfaced 35 biopsies with amplification of the lymphatic vasculature that was associated with the appearance of regionalized but not diffuse inflammatory infiltrates and that also contained enough tissue for further studies. Twelve biopsies with moderate lymphatic proliferation without nodular lymphatic infiltrates were also selected and included six cases with acute diffuse rejection reaction were included.

The MLVD (expressed as number of podoplanin-positive vascular profiles per MPF) was very low in normal control kidney cortex (0.24 ± 0.1 vessels/MPF; Figure 1J). In the acute phases of rejection, identified by high Banff scores of acute rejection (Table 1) with diffuse mononuclear infiltrate and severe tubulitis, no significant proliferation of lymphatic vessels was observed, and their location and number resembled that of normal kidneys (Figure 1J). By contrast, significant amplification of the lymphatic microvasculature was observed in all 35 selected biopsies and explants that contained nodular infiltrates, with average density of 14.7 ± 8.6/MPF (Figure 1J), widely ranging from 41.6 to 3.7 vessels/MPF. Lymphatic vessels were found in the periarterial adventitia, as well as within the intertubular stroma (Figure 1A).

Numerous podoplanin-positive lymphatic endothelial cells expressed the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (Figure 1, E through H). The identity of lymphatics was confirmed by double immunofluorescence with antibodies to LYVE-1 and Prox-1 (Figure 1, C and D). Glomeruli in the sections of the present study are by and large unlabeled because human podocytes express less podoplanin than lymphatic endothelial cells, in contrast to rat kidneys (Figure 1B).

Clinicopathologic Correlation
An attempt was made to correlate lymphatic proliferation and/or occurrence of nodular infiltrates with the clinical outcome criteria: graft loss, death of the patient with functioning graft, and functioning graft at present, taking also into consideration the time elapsed between transplantation, biopsy, and present end point of the study at the end of 2002. The patients were divided into two groups, one showing nodular infiltrates and lymphatic proliferation and the second without nodular infiltrates and few lymphatic vessels (Table 1).

Nine of ten cases of graft losses occurred in the first group and showed a long interval between transplantation and organ loss (average 334 wk). Thirteen patients in the same group had functioning grafts at the end of this study (average creatinine 2.1), with a similar average time distance to the transplantation of 358 wk. Two patients died with functioning grafts, and no information was available about the outcome of 10 patients.

The biopsies of patients without nodular infiltrates consistently showed a lower MLVD than those in the first group (Table 1). There was only one graft loss out of 12 patients, and for the remaining cases, the average time from transplantation to the end of the study was only 184 wk and the average creatinine amounted to 2.35. One patient of this group died with functioning graft, and no information was available on four patients.

VEGF-C Is Produced by Interstitial Macrophages
Within nodular infiltrates, VEGF-C was expressed by a small fraction of mononuclear cells that were identified as CD68+CD32+CD14+ macrophages coexpressing also VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 (Figure 2).



View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. (A) A nodular infiltrate, triple immunolabeled for macrophages (CD68, blue), lymphatic vessels (podoplanin, brown, Ly), and Ki-67 (red, open arrowheads). (B) Confocal immunofluorescence indicating podoplanin in the red channel, vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) in green, and DAPI in the blue channel. Several VEGF-C–expressing cells (arrowheads, and labeled red in the insert) are located in proximity to the lymphatic vessels. (C through H) Typing of the VEGF-C–expressing cells (green in C, E, and G), counterlabeled with VEGF-D (red in D), CD23 (red in F), and CD68 (red in H). Magnifications: x200 in A; x800 in B; x1600 in C through H.

 
Lymphatic Vessels Are Presumptive Exit Routes for Lymphocytes
Lymphatic vessels were found frequently to contain mononuclear cells, most of which were identified as CD2+ cells (Figure 1I). They also carried resting B lymphocytes and Ki-67+, B, and T lymphocytes (Figure 3B).



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. (A and B) Podoplanin-expressing lymphatic vessels (brown, Ly) in the center of nodular infiltrates are surrounded by densely packed mononuclear cells that express the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (blue). Ki-67+ cells are also carried in the lumen of some lymphatic vessels (Ly). (C) Nodular mononuclear infiltrate, triple labeled for B lymphocytes (CD20, red), T lymphocytes (CD3, blue), and lymphatic vessels (podoplanin, brown). T and B lymphocytes occupy different regions in this example, and several lymphatic vessels (Ly) are closely associated with the nodular infiltrate. (D) Triple labeling of aggregated B lymphocytes (CD20, blue), an adjacent lymphatic vessel (brown, Ly), and the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (red). Several Ki-67+ B lymphocytes are indicated by arrows. (E) Localization of Ig {lambda} chains within a nodular infiltrate (brown). Erythrocyte-free, putative lymphatic vessels are labeled L. (F) A nodular infiltrate triple immunolabeled for T lymphocytes (CD3, blue), lymphatic vessels (brown), and the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (red, open arrowheads). Full arrowheads and the insert indicate activated Ki-67+ T lymphocytes. (G) A nodular infiltrate, triple immunolabeled for CD4+ T lymphocytes (blue), lymphatic vessels (brown), and Ki-67 (red, open arrowheads). Full arrowheads indicate activated Ki-67+ CD4+ T lymphocytes. (H) Triple immunolabeling highlighting dendritic cells (S-100, blue), lymphatic vessel (brown), and Ki-67 (red, open arrowheads). (I) A nodular infiltrate triple immunolabeled for CD8+ T lymphocytes (blue), lymphatic vessels (brown), and Ki-67 (red, open arrowheads). Full arrowheads indicate activated Ki-67+ CD8+ T lymphocytes. Magnifications: x400 in A, B, E, F, H, and I; x170 in C; x550 in D; x450 in G.

 
Nodular Mononuclear Infiltrates Are Associated with Lymphatic Vessels and Contain Proliferating T and B Lymphocytes
Nodular infiltrates were constantly associated with lymphatic vessels (Figures 1 and 3Go) that were found on the periphery of nodules and sometimes also in their center (Figure 3, A and I). When the course of lymphatic vessels was followed, it became apparent that nodular infiltrates were built up only focally, leaving intervening stretches of "naked" lymphatic vessels in between (Figure 3C). No coincidence of Ki-67+ lymphatic endothelia and nodular infiltrates was obvious.

A large number of mononuclear cells within nodular infiltrates expressed the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (Figure 3). The nodular infiltrates were composed of variable proportions of T and B lymphocytes that were frequently segregated into different regions (Figure 3C), and occasionally clusters of {lambda}- and {kappa}-chain–producing plasmacytoid cells (Figure 3E) and arborized S-100+ dendritic cells were observed in proximity to lymphatic vessels (Figure 3H). CD4+CD25+ cells were absent, and CD45RA+ and CD53+ memory B cells and CD21+ follicular dendritic cells were rare (data not shown). Triple labeling revealed that cells expressing the proliferation marker Ki-67 were mostly of T lymphocyte lineage (approximately 75%) or B lymphocytes (25%).

CCR7+ Cells Cluster around Lymphatic Vessels
Double immunofluorescence showed the colocalization of podoplanin-positive lymphatic vessels and numerous CCR7+ cells within nodular infiltrates (Figure 4). CCR7+ cells frequently showed on their surfaces granular deposits of podoplanin (Figure 3D, inserts). RANKL-receptor, IL-7, lymphotoxin {alpha} and {beta} receptors, ELK/CCL19, CXCL13, and CXCR5 were not detected (data not shown).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. (A through C) Co-localization in cryostat sections of transplanted kidneys of podoplanin (A), SLC/CCL21 (B), and merged signals (C), indicating that the chemokine is expressed by lymphatic endothelial cells in situ. (D) Double localization of a podoplanin expressing lymphatic vessel (L, green) and CCR7+ mononuclear cells (red) in a nodular infiltrate. Arrowheads indicate CCR7+ cells that display small granular deposits of podoplanin on their surfaces (inserts). Magnifications: x800 in A through C; x600 in D; x1200 in insert.

 
Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Produce SLC/CCL21
Lymphatic endothelial cells in nodular infiltrates expressed SLC/CCL21 (Figures 4, A through C, and 5AGo) that co-localized with podoplanin. These complexes were found along the basolateral membrane of lymphatic endothelial cells and sequestered into the perivascular stroma as seen by double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy (Figure 5, B and C).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of podoplanin (A) and double localization of podoplanin (10 nm gold) and SCL/CCL21 (5 nm of gold; B and C) by postembedding labeling in Lowicryl sections of renal transplants. Podoplanin is expressed predominately but not exclusively on the abluminal aspect of the lymphatic endothelial cell (arrows and arrowheads) that lack a canonical basement membrane. Small clusters of gold particles indicate podoplanin in the perivascular stroma (arrows). L, lymphatic capillary lumen; ER, endoplasmic reticulum. Arrowhead: luminal localization of podoplanin. (B and C) Podoplanin (10 nm of gold) is localized to the luminal and basal surfaces of the lymphatic endothelial cells and is also found in clusters with SLC/CCL21 (5 nm of gold), along the basal cell membrane, and shed into the perivascular space (open arrowheads). (D) Surface plasmon resonance data obtained in a BiaCore apparatus to show the dose-dependent, high-affinity binding of increasing concentrations of recombinant SCL/CCL21 to immobilized, glycosylated podoplanin-Fc fusion protein, expressed in relative binding units on the y axis. No binding was observed when unglycosylated recombinant podoplanin was used (coincident with the x axis). The lower panel shows the dose-dependent competition of heparin to the binding of SCL/CCL21 to immobilized glycosylated podoplanin-Fc fusion protein. Magnifications: x45,000 in A; x65,000 in B; x80,000 in C.

 
Podoplanin Binds to SCL/CCL21
High-affinity binding of SLC/CCL21 to immobilized recombinant glycosylated podoplanin receptor-Fc fusion protein was found by surface plasmon-resonance, with a Kd of 89.7 ± 13.4 nM (Figure 5), and was abolished when unglycosylated podoplanin was used as binding substrate. Binding was dose dependent and competed by heparin in a dose-response manner (Figure 5).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Angiogenesis of renal lymphatic vessels under pathologic conditions is an uncharted territory, primarily because of the lack of reliable markers for lymphatic endothelial cells. Here we compared the distribution of lymphatic vessels in normal kidneys and grafts with transplant rejection by immunohistochemistry and discovered the occurrence of massive lymphatic neoangiogenesis in transplants, as well as a novel function of lymphatic vessels in association with immunologically active, intrarenal nodular lymphatic infiltrates.

Critical for investigations in the nascent field of lymphangiogenesis is the reliability of the immunocytochemical markers used (13). Currently, four markers distinguish lymphatic from blood vessel endothelial cells: (1) the membrane mucoprotein, called by us podoplanin, that qualifies as highly specific for lymphatic endothelial cells (12) and was instrumental for the first isolation of pure lymphatic endothelial cell lineages from human dermis (14, 15); (2) VEGFR-3 that is also expressed in endothelial cells of newly formed blood vessels (16); (3) LYVE-1, a CD44-related hyaluronate receptor (17); and (4) Prox-1, a transcription factor that controls the lymphatic phenotype of endothelial cells (18). In this study, the immunohistochemical results were obtained primarily with antibodies to podoplanin, and identical results were obtained by double labeling with antibodies against LYVE-1 and Prox-1.

In the cortex of normal human kidney, podoplanin/LYVE-1/Prox-1–expressing lymphatic vessels were confined to the adventitia of large- and middle-sized arteries, as described previously (19). This pattern of distribution persisted in acute phases of transplant rejection with intense interstitial mononuclear infiltration. However, in biopsies containing nodular infiltrates, there was approximately 50-fold amplification of the lymphatic vessel density over controls, with lymphatic microvessels reaching deep into the tubulointerstitial space. These lymphatic vessels were formed by lymphangiogenesis, as many of them expressed the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 and presumably sprouted from preexistent perivascular lymphatics. In the lumina of the newly formed lymphatics, CD2+ and fewer CD2- cells were frequently encountered, indicating that the lymphatic vessels contribute to the clearing of the rejection infiltrate from the renal cortex. Moreover, previous results of experimental renal transplantation indicated that the hilar lymphatics of the graft drained large amounts of lymphatic fluid and mononuclear cells, thus supporting the functionality of these vessels (7). Lymphatic neoangiogenesis apparently involved the tubulointerstitial infiltration of CD68+CD23+ macrophages that produce VEGF-C and VEGF-D, similar to a recently discovered subset of tumor-associated macrophages that were related to peritumoral lymphatic vessel proliferation (10) and to tubulointerstitial mononuclear cells in the rat remnant kidney model of cortical fibrosis (20). These data provide further support for the hypothesis that VEGF-C–producing macrophages contribute to regionalized lymphatic neoangiogenesis.

A potentially important observation in all biopsies with nodular infiltrates is the co-localization of lymphatic vessels with the nodular mononuclear infiltrates that presumably are immunologically highly active organoid structures, with sometimes massive Ki67+ T and B lymphocyte activation. Immunohistochemical typing of the nodular mononuclear infiltrates revealed clusters of CD4+ and CD8+ cells, as well as CD20+ B lymphocytes and {lambda} and {kappa} chain-expressing plasmacytoid cells. S-100+ dendritic cells were observed in association with lymphatic vessels. These results provide evidence that within the perilymphovascular nodular infiltrates, activation and maturation of T lymphocytes occur by antigen presentation by dendritic cells and that CD-20+ B cells mature to Ig-producing plasmacytoid cells. Thus, nodular infiltrates resemble "tertiary" lymphatic organs in autoimmune diseases that locally perpetuate autoimmune reactions and support autoantigenic epitope spreading (21). As a consequence, it is possible that in transplants, a cellular and/or humoral alloantigenic response could be contained within the grafted organ and thus difficult to detect in the circulation. In contrast to lymphatic organs developing, for example, in lymphoid organogenesis or in autoimmune diseases, nodular infiltrates in transplants were not associated with high endothelial venules (data not shown), suggesting that their constituent lymphocytes were recruited locally and not from the circulation.

Surprisingly little is known about the occurrence and function in graft rejection of nodular infiltrates so far, and it is not clear yet whether they indicate a distinct clinicopathologic entity. The current study was aimed primarily at establishing the connection of lymphovascular neoangiogenesis and the occurrence of peri- and paralymphovascular lymphoid organ-like infiltrates. The clinical correlation with the pathomorphologic data suggests that nodular infiltrates are found in approximately 10 to 15% (35 of <350) of transplant biopsies. Also, some correlation was observed between the occurrence of nodular infiltrates with the chronicity indices of the Banff classification. The occurrence of nodular infiltrates and lymphatic proliferation could be associated with an increased chance of graft loss, as all graft losses but one clustered within this group of patients (Table 1). However, the significant differences in the time periods between transplantation, taking of the biopsy, and end point of this study, between the patients with nodular infiltrates and robust lymphatic proliferation and those without nodular infiltrates and lower MLVD, impairs this speculation. Thus, because of the relatively small number of samples and the inhomogeneity of the patient groups, no relevant information can be deduced from this preliminary study, and therefore the precise chronology of nodular infiltrates and their relation to lymphatic neoangiogenesis remain to be determined in a systematic large-scale analysis of protocol biopsies, which is currently under way (Stuhte and Kerjaschki, unpublished observations).

The close association of nodular infiltrates with lymphatic vessels raises the possibility that the lymphatic endothelial cells actively recruit lymphocytes. A good candidate chemokine for this purpose is SLC/CCL21, which organizes lymphatic follicles when expressed ectopically in {beta} cells of mouse pancreas (22) and attracts mononuclear cells in inflammatory diseases (23), whereas mice with deletion of the SLC/CCL21 gene fail to develop lymph nodes in certain regions (24). We previously discovered that SLC/CCL21 is produced and polarly secreted by isolated lymphatic endothelial cells (14). Here we show that lymphatic vessels in transplants produce SLC/CCL21 in situ and are surrounded by CCR7+ cells, providing direct evidence for SLC/CCL21-mediated lymphocyte and presumably also dendritic cell chemoattraction by lymphatic vessels. These findings assign a novel, active role to lymphatic vessels in the organization of the perilymphovascular nodular infiltrates in renal transplants and perhaps in lymphoid organogenesis in general.

In tissues, SLC/CCL21 gradients are required for the directed migration of CCR7+ cells (25) and are established by charge interactions with proteoglycans in basement membranes (26), which, however, are not produced by lymphatic vessels. Here we provide evidence by double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy that podoplanin contributes to the perilymphovascular SLC/CCL21 gradient formation, as SLC/CCL21-podoplanin complexes appear on the basal cell membrane of lymphatic endothelia and are shed into the perivascular stroma. This process is presumably facilitated by a reorientation of the expression of podoplanin from the luminal membrane of lymphatic endothelia in normal tissue (12, 27 ) toward the abluminal membrane in the setting of transplant rejection shown here. As ultimate proof for podoplanin-SCL/CCL21 complex formation, surface plasmon resonance binding indicated a high-affinity charge and carbohydrate side chain–dependent binding of podoplanin to SLC/CCL21. Its ligation with other chemokines remains to be determined. Collectively, these data provide evidence that SLC/CCL21-podoplanin complexes contribute to the perivascular gradient formation and assign a novel function to podoplanin as a binder of chemokines in lymphatic endothelial cells.

In conclusion, the results of this study put newly formed lymphatic vessels and peri- and paralymphovascular infiltrates center stage as foci of immunologic activity in human renal transplants. By virtue of their cellular composition, nodular infiltrates have the potential to launch and perpetuate specific immune responses to graft alloantigens and thus could contribute to recurrent episodes of acute rejection, support humoral rejection (28), pave the way for chronic rejection and eventual loss of transplant function, and thus could provide a novel therapeutic target. Although the observations obtained in this study on human biopsy material are necessarily primarily descriptive, they offer several functional hypotheses that now can be tested in experimental systems.


    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by the Fonds zur Foerderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Project 05, Contract 007, and grant QLG1-CZ-2000-00619 from the European Community (to D.K.).

We thank Dr. Agnes Fogo for critical reading of this manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Karlberg I, Nyberg G: Cost-effectiveness studies of renal transplantation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11: 611–622, 1995[Medline]
  2. Massy ZA, Guijarro C, Kasike BL: Clinical predictors of chronic renal allograft rejection. Kidney Int Suppl 52: S85–S88, 1995[Medline]
  3. Pirsch JD, Ploeg RJ, Gange S, D’Alessandro AM, Knechtle SJ, Sollinger HW, Kalayoglu M, Belzer FO: Determinants of graft survival after renal transplantation. Transplantation 61: 1581–1586, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Slakey DP, Thomas JM: Mechanisms of cell-mediated rejection. In: Kidney Transplant Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment, edited by Racusen LC, Solez K, Burdick JF, New York, Marcel Dekker, 1998, pp 423–468
  5. Meehan SM, McCluskey RT, Pascual M, Preffer FI, Anderson P, Schlossman SF, Colvin RB: Cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human renal allografts: Identification, distribution, and quantitation of cells with a cytotoxic granule protein GMP-17 (TIA-1) and cells with fragmented nuclear DNA. Lab Invest 76: 639–649, 1997[Medline]
  6. Paavonen K, Puolakkainen P, Jussila L, Jahkola T, Alitalo K: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in lymphangiogenesis in wound healing. Am J Pathol 56: 1499–1504, 2000
  7. Pedersen NC, Morris BJ: The role of the lymphatic system in the rejection of homografts: A study of lymph from renal transplants. J Exp Med 131: 936–969, 1970[Abstract]
  8. Sleeman JP, Krishnan J, Kirkin V, Baumann P: Markers for the lymphatic endothelium: In search of the holy grail? Microsc Res Tech 55: 61–69, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kain R, Matsui K, Exner M, Binder S, Schaffner G, Sommer EM, Kerjaschki D: A novel class of autoantigens of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis: The lysosomal membrane glycoprotein h-lamp-2 in neutrophil granulocytes and a related membrane protein in glomerular endothelial cells. J Exp Med 181: 585–597, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schoppmann SF, Birner P, Stockl J, Kalt R, Ullrich R, Caucig C, Kriehuber E, Nagy K, Alitalo K, Kerjaschki D: Tumor-associated macrophages express lymphatic endothelial growth factors and are related to peritumoral lymphangiogenesis. Am J Pathol 161: 947–956, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yang N, Isbel NM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Li Y, Ye R, Atkins RC, Lan HY: Local macrophage proliferation in human glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 54: 143–151, 1998[Medline]
  12. Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, Horvat R, Amann G, Kriehuber E, Diem K, Weninger W, Tschachler E, Alitalo K, Kerjaschki D: Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: Podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol 154: 385–394, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jain RK, Padera TP: Lymphatics make the break. Science 299: 209–210, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kriehuber E, Breiteneder-Geleff S, Groeger M, Soleiman A, Schoppmann SF, Stingl G, Kerjaschki D, Maurer D: Isolation and characterization of dermal lymphatic and blood endothelial cells reveal stable and functionally specialized cell lineages. J Exp Med 194: 797–808, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Makinen T, Veikkola T, Mustjoki S, Karpanen T, Catimel B, Nice EC, Wise L, Mercer A, Kowalski H, Kerjaschki D, Stacker SA, Achen MG, Alitalo K: Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3. EMBO J 20: 4762–4773, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Alitalo K, Carmeliet P: Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. Cancer Cell 1: 219–227, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Banerji S, Ni J, Wang SX, Clasper S, Su J, Tammi R, Jones M, Jackson DG: LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. J Cell Biol 144: 789–801, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wigle JT, Oliver G: Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell 98: 769–778, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. McIntosh GH, Morris B: The lymphatics of the kidney and the formation of renal lymph. J Physiol 214: 365–376, 1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Matsui K, Nagy-Bojarsky K, Laakonen P, Krieger S, Mechtler K, Geleff S, Kang DH, Johnson RJ, Kerjaschki D: Lymphatic microvessels in the rat remnant kidney model of renal fibrosis: Aminopeptidase P and Podoplanin are discriminatory markers for endothelial cells of blood and lymphatic vessels. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 1981–1989, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Armengol MP, Juan M, Lucas-Martin A, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Jaraquemada D, Gallart T, Pujol-Borrell R: Thyroid autoimmune disease: Demonstration of thyroid antigen-specific B cells and recombination-activating gene expression in chemokine-containing active intrathyroidal germinal centers. Am J Pathol 159: 861–873, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Fan L, Reilly CR, Luo Y, Dorf ME, Lo D: Cutting edge: Ectopic expression of the chemokine TCA4/SLC is sufficient to trigger lymphoid neogenesis. J Immunol 164: 3955–3959, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Weninger W, Carlsen HS, Goodarzi M, Moazed F, Crowley MA, Baekkevold ES, Cavanagh LL, von Andrian UH: Naive Tcell recruitment to nonlymphoid tissues: A role for endothelium-expressed CC chemokine ligand 21 in autoimmune disease and lymphoid neogenesis. J Immunol 170: 4638–4648, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gunn MD, Kyuwa S, Tam C, Kakiuchi T, Matsuzawa A, Williams LT, Nakano H: Mice lacking expression of secondary lymphoid organ chemokine have defects in lymphocyte homing and dendritic cell localization. J Exp Med 189: 451–460, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hirose J, Kawashima H, Yoshie O, Tashiro K, Miyasaka M: Versican interacts with chemokines and modulates cellular responses. J Biol Chem 276: 5228–5234, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Christopherson KW 2nd, Campbell JJ, Travers JB, Hromas RA: Low-molecular-weight heparins inhibit CCL21-induced T cell adhesion and migration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 290–295, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Schacht V, Ramirez MI, Hong YK, Hirakawa S, Feng D, Harvey N, Williams M, Dvorak AM, Dvorak HF, Oliver G, Detmar M: T1{alpha}/podoplanin deficiency disrupts normal lymphatic vasculature formation and causes lymphedema. EMBO J 22: 3546–3556, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Regele H, Bohmig GA, Habicht A, Gollowitzer D, Schillinger M, Rockenschaub S, Watschinger B, Kerjaschki D, Exner M: Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in renal allografts is associated with basement membrane injury in peritubular and glomerular capillaries: A contribution of humoral immunity to chronic allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 2371–2380, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 14, 2003. Accepted for publication November 22, 2003.


Related Article

This Month’s Highlights
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004 15: A24-A26. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
N. Wick, D. Haluza, E. Gurnhofer, I. Raab, M.-T. Kasimir, M. Prinz, C.-W. Steiner, C. Reinisch, A. Howorka, P. Giovanoli, et al.
Lymphatic Precollectors Contain a Novel, Specialized Subpopulation of Podoplaninlow, CCL27-Expressing Lymphatic Endothelial Cells
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2008; 173(4): 1202 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Halin, H. Fahrngruber, J. G. Meingassner, G. Bold, A. Littlewood-Evans, A. Stuetz, and M. Detmar
Inhibition of Chronic and Acute Skin Inflammation by Treatment with a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 173(1): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. M. Jevnikar and R. B. Mannon
Late Kidney Allograft Loss: What We Know about It, and What We Can Do about It
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S56 - S67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. Kajiya, R. Huggenberger, I. Drinnenberg, B. Ma, and M. Detmar
Nitric oxide mediates lymphatic vessel activation via soluble guanylate cyclase {alpha}1{beta}1-impact on inflammation
FASEB J, February 1, 2008; 22(2): 530 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. Bekiaris, D. Withers, S. H. Glanville, F. M. McConnell, S. M. Parnell, M.-Y. Kim, F. M. C. Gaspal, E. Jenkinson, C. Sweet, G. Anderson, et al.
Role of CD30 in B/T Segregation in the Spleen
J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7535 - 7543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Manzo, S. Bugatti, R. Caporali, R. Prevo, D. G. Jackson, M. Uguccioni, C. D. Buckley, C. Montecucco, and C. Pitzalis
CCL21 Expression Pattern of Human Secondary Lymphoid Organ Stroma Is Conserved in Inflammatory Lesions with Lymphoid Neogenesis
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 171(5): 1549 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Halin, N. E. Tobler, B. Vigl, L. F. Brown, and M. Detmar
VEGF-A produced by chronically inflamed tissue induces lymphangiogenesis in draining lymph nodes
Blood, November 1, 2007; 110(9): 3158 - 3167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mayer, K. L. Hudkins, F. Heller, H. Schmid, M. Kretzler, U. Brandt, H.-J. Anders, H. Regele, P. J. Nelson, C. E. Alpers, et al.
Expression of the chemokine receptor CCR1 in human renal allografts
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1720 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. C. Furtado, T. Marinkovic, A. P. Martin, A. Garin, B. Hoch, W. Hubner, B. K. Chen, E. Genden, M. Skobe, and S. A. Lira
Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling is required for inflammatory lymphangiogenesis in the thyroid
PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5026 - 5031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. M. Steinmetz, R. A. K. Stahl, and U. Panzer
Formation of lymphoid-like tissue in the kidney--is there a role for chemokines?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 350 - 352.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
F. Heller, M. T. Lindenmeyer, C. D. Cohen, U. Brandt, D. Draganovici, M. Fischereder, M. Kretzler, H.-J. Anders, T. Sitter, I. Mosberger, et al.
The Contribution of B Cells to Renal Interstitial Inflammation
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2007; 170(2): 457 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
N. Wick, P. Saharinen, J. Saharinen, E. Gurnhofer, C. W. Steiner, I. Raab, D. Stokic, P. Giovanoli, S. Buchsbaum, A. Burchard, et al.
Transcriptomal comparison of human dermal lymphatic endothelial cells ex vivo and in vitro
Physiol Genomics, January 17, 2007; 28(2): 179 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Liao and N. H. Ruddle
Synchrony of high endothelial venules and lymphatic vessels revealed by immunization.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3369 - 3379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Saaristo, T. Tammela, A. Farkkila, M. Karkkainen, E. Suominen, S. Yla-Herttuala, and K. Alitalo
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Accelerates Diabetic Wound Healing
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2006; 169(3): 1080 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Karpanen, M. Wirzenius, T. Makinen, T. Veikkola, H. J. Haisma, M. G. Achen, S. A. Stacker, B. Pytowski, S. Yla-Herttuala, and K. Alitalo
Lymphangiogenic Growth Factor Responsiveness Is Modulated by Postnatal Lymphatic Vessel Maturation
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2006; 169(2): 708 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Tammela, B. Enholm, K. Alitalo, and K. Paavonen
The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2005; 65(3): 550 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Alitalo, S. Mohla, and E. Ruoslahti
Lymphangiogenesis and Cancer: Meeting Report
Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 9225 - 9229.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Groger, R. Loewe, W. Holnthoner, R. Embacher, M. Pillinger, G. S. Herron, K. Wolff, and P. Petzelbauer
IL-3 Induces Expression of Lymphatic Markers Prox-1 and Podoplanin in Human Endothelial Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2004; 173(12): 7161 - 7169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. He, I. Rajantie, M. Ilmonen, T. Makinen, M. J. Karkkainen, P. Haiko, P. Salven, and K. Alitalo
Preexisting Lymphatic Endothelium but not Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Essential for Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Lymphatic Metastasis
Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 64(11): 3737 - 3740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. B. Colvin
Emphatically Lymphatic
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 827 - 829.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed