| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
BASIC SCIENCE |
1 in Mesangial Cells by Stabilizing Smad Transcriptional Corepressor TGIF
Division of Cellular and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Correspondence to Dr. Youhua Liu, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, S-405 Biomedical Science Tower, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Phone: 412-648-8253; Fax: 412-648-1916; E-mail: liuy{at}upmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 were investigated. Western blot analysis and immunostaining revealed that HGF suppressed
-smooth muscle actin expression induced by TGF-
1 in cultured rat and human mesangial cells. HGF also inhibited TGF-
1mediated fibronectin and type I collagen expression. Such action of HGF was dependent on the activation of extracellular signalregulated kinase-1 and -2 but not on Akt and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. HGF did not affect TGF-
1mediated Smad2 phosphorylation and its nuclear translocation. However, it rapidly upregulated Smad transcriptional corepressor TG-interacting factor (TGIF) abundance in mesangial cells, which was primarily mediated by stabilizing its protein from degradation. Ectopic expression of TGIF markedly suppressed Smad-mediated activation of TGF-
1responsive promoter activity and completely blocked TGF-
1induced
-smooth muscle actin expression. In vivo, TGIF expression was dramatically downregulated in the glomeruli of diabetic kidneys, and delivery of exogenous HGF induced TGIF expression. These results suggest that HGF specifically antagonizes the profibrotic action of TGF-
1 in mesangial cells by stabilizing Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-smooth muscle actin (
-SMA) expression and matrix overproduction, is considered as a predominant feature of diabetic nephropathy (1). Extensive studies indicate that activated mesangial cells are the major effector cells responsible for a relentless expression of interstitial matrix components such as fibronectin and type I collagen (2), which not only directly results in mesangial expansion leading to glomerulosclerosis but also is fundamentally linked to endothelial and podocyte damage within the glomeruli, as well as to secondary tubulointerstitial injury. Hence, mesangial cell activation is often regarded as a central event that plays a critical role in the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy.
Numerous factors regulate the phenotypic transformation of mesangial cells from quiescent to matrix-overproducing, activated state (24). Of the many factors identified, TGF-
1 is the most potent cytokine that induces mesangial activation both in vitro and in vivo (58). The importance of TGF-
1 in diabetic nephropathy is also illustrated by the fact that many metabolic, hormonal, and hemodynamic factors in diabetic milieu all converge on a downstream pathway to upregulate the expression of TGF-
1 and its receptors in the kidney (9,10). In vitro, TGF-
1 has been demonstrated to stimulate mesangial cell activation and to induce matrix expression in many studies (2,6). Accordingly, blockade of TGF-
1s action with neutralizing antibody has been proved to be effective in ameliorating diabetic nephropathy in animals (11).
Whereas many factors with positive influence on mesangial cell activation have been described, relatively little is known about the factors that can suppress the process of mesangial activation. Recent studies demonstrate that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a potent antifibrotic cytokine that prevents
-SMApositive myofibroblast activation from interstitial fibroblasts and blocks mesenchymal transdifferentiation from tubular epithelial cells induced by TGF-
1 (1215). In addition, emerging evidence indicates that HGF is also capable of preventing
-SMA expression in renal glomeruli and mitigating diabetic nephropathy in vivo (16,17). These observations led us to hypothesize that HGF may be an endogenous negative regulator that specifically suppresses mesangial cell activation under pathologic conditions.
In the present study, we show that HGF specifically blocks mesangial cell activation induced by TGF-
1 in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HGF antagonizes the profibrotic action of TGF-
1 by upregulating Smad transcriptional corepressor TG-interacting factor (TGIF), which in turn suppresses Smad-mediated gene transcription. Such induction of TGIF expression by HGF is largely mediated by promoting the corepressors stability, rather than by inducing its gene expression. Moreover, HGF restores TGIF protein expression in the glomeruli of diabetic kidney in vivo. These findings unravel the mechanism underlying the interaction between profibrotic TGF-
1 and antifibrotic HGF in mesangial cells and provide a cellular and molecular basis for HGFs acting as a therapeutic agent for combating diabetic nephropathy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant human HGF protein was provided by Genentech (South San Francisco, CA). Chemical inhibitors PD98059, wortmannin, and SC68376 were purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). The cells were collected at different time points after treatments for various analyses.
Western Blot Analysis
Detection of protein expression by Western blot analyses was performed according to the procedures described previously (13). The primary antibodies used were as follow: anti
-SMA (clone 1A4) and anti-extracellular signalregulated kinase-1 and -2 (Erk-1/2) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); antibodies against phospho-specific Erk-1/2, phospho-specific and total Akt, phospho-specific and total p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phospho-specific and total c-Jun N-terminal kinase (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverley, MA); antiphospho-specific Smad-2 (Upstate, Charlottesville, VA); anti-TGIF (sc-17800), antic-Ski (sc-9140), anti-SnoN (sc-9595), anti-Sp1 (sc-420), and anti-actin (sc-1616) antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); antifibronectin (clone 10; BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Jose, CA); and antitype I collagen (Calbiochem). Affinity-purified secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Indirect immunofluorescence staining was performed using an established procedure (13,19). Cells were double stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, HCl to visualize the nuclei. Kidney cryosections were stained with antibodies against TGIF (sc-9825; Santa Cruz) and human HGF using the Vector MOM immunodetection kit by the protocol specified by the manufacturer (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Monoclonal antibody against human HGF (clone H-14) was prepared by our laboratory and described elsewhere (20). This antibody specifically recognizes human HGF but does not cross-react with mouse or rat HGF protein. Stained cells were mounted with antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and viewed with a Nikon Eclipse E600 Epi-fluorescence microscope equipped with a digital camera (Melville, NY).
Nuclear Protein Extraction
Mesangial cells were subjected to various treatments with different growth factors for 30 min except where otherwise indicated. For HGF blockage of TGF-
1 signaling, cells were treated with 40 ng/ml HGF 30 min before addition of 2 ng/ml TGF-
1. Cell nuclei were isolated by procedures described elsewhere (21). After being collected by centrifugation, the nuclei were lysed with SDS sample buffer and subjected to Western blot analysis as described above.
Northern Blot Analysis
Northern blot analysis for gene expression was carried out by routine procedures, as described previously (22). Briefly, samples of 20 µg of total RNA were electrophoresed on 1.0% formaldehyde-agarose gels and then transferred to GeneScreen plus nylon membrane (Dupont, Boston, MA) by capillary blotting. The membrane was hybridized with 32P-labeled TGIF cDNA probe. After autoradiography, the membrane was stripped and rehybridized with rat glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe to ensure equal loading of each lane.
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitation was carried out according to a procedure established previously (21). Briefly, mesangial cell lysates were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 µg of anti-TGIF, followed by precipitation with 20 µl of protein A/G Plus-Agarose for 3 h at 4°C. The immunoprecipitates were boiled for 5 min in SDS sample buffer. The resulting precipitated complexes were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and blotted with anti-Smad4 antibody.
DNA Transfection and Luciferase Assay
The reporter construct p3TP-Lux, Smad2 and Smad3 expression vectors, and TGIF expression vector (pHA-TGIF) were provided by Dr. J. Massague (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) (2325). Mesangial cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux (1.0 µg), with or without Smad2 (0.5 µg) and/or Smad3 (0.5 µg) expression vectors, and pHA-TGIF (0.5 µg) expression vector. A fixed amount (0.1 µg) of internal control reporter Renilla reniformis luciferase driven under thymidine kinase (TK) promoter (pRL-TK; Promega, Madison, WI) was also co-transfected for normalizing the transfection efficiency. After transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen), the cells were incubated for an additional 48 h in the absence or presence of 2 ng/ml TGF-
1. Luciferase assay was performed using the Dual Luciferase Assay System kit essentially according to the manufacturers protocols (Promega). Relative luciferase activity of each construct (arbitrary unit) was reported as fold induction after normalizing for transfection efficiency. All experiments were repeated at least three times to assume reproducibility.
Animals
The mouse uninephrectomized diabetic model and HGF treatment were described previously (16,26,27). A fraction of kidney was pooled from 6 to 8 animals in each group. Renal glomeruli were isolated by differential sieving technique, as reported elsewhere (28). Isolated glomeruli were lysed in SDS sample buffer and subjected to Western blot analysis for TGIF and actin abundance, respectively. Kidney cryosections were stained for TGIF and human HGF by using double immunofluorescence staining techniques.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SigmaStat software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael CA). Comparison between groups was made using one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Kuels test (29). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1
1 induced
-SMA expression in cultured rat and human mesangial cells in a time-dependent manner. Maximal expression of
-SMA was found at 48 and 72 h after treatment with 2 ng/ml TGF-
1 in rat and human mesangial cells, respectively (Figure 1, A and C). Induction of
-SMA expression by TGF-
1 was also dose-dependent (data not shown). Of interest, simultaneous incubation of TGF-
1 with HGF significantly suppressed
-SMA expression in mesangial cells at different time points (Figure 1). Dose-dependent studies revealed that HGF at the concentration of 20 ng/ml (0.21 nM) largely abolished the
-SMA expression induced by 2 ng/ml TGF-
1 (0.16 nM; Figure 1B). Possibly because of its human origin, recombinant HGF seemed to be more effective in human mesangial cells (Figure 1C) than in their rat counterparts (Figure 1A). Of note, treatment with HGF alone at various concentrations did not affect
-SMA expression in mesangial cells (Figure 1B).
|
1 for 48 h markedly induced
-SMA expression. There were abundant
-SMApositive fibrils in the cytoplasm of mesangial cells. However, HGF essentially abrogated TGF-
1mediated
-SMApositive fibril formation (Figure 1G).
Because one of the consequences of mesangial cell activation is to overproduce extracellular matrix, we next examined the effects of HGF on TGF-
1mediated induction of matrix components in mesangial cells. As shown in Figure 1, TGF-
1 induced both fibronectin and type I collagen expression (Figure 1, I and L), and HGF effectively abolished their expression and assembly (Figure 1, J and M).
Blockage of Mesangial Cell Activation by HGF Is Dependent on Erk-MAPK Pathway
To unravel the mechanism underlying HGF inhibition of mesangial cell activation, we investigated the signaling events that are important for HGF abrogation of TGF-
1mediated
-SMA expression. Treatment of mesangial cells with HGF activated several distinct signal pathways (Figure 2). Erk-1/2, members of the MAPK family, were markedly activated in mesangial cells upon HGF stimulation (Figure 2A). Such activation of Erk-1/2 as illustrated by their phosphorylation could be completely blocked by PD98059, a specific Erk-1/2 upstream kinase Mek1 inhibitor. HGF also induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation in mesangial cells (Figure 2C), whereas c-Jun N-terminal kinase was not activated (data not shown). In addition, HGF induced Akt phosphorylation in mesangial cells, which could be blocked by wortmannin, a specific inhibitor of the Akt upstream phosphoinositide 3-kinase (Figure 2B).
|
1mediated mesangial cell activation. As shown in Figure 2, blockade of either p38 MAPK activation by SC68376 or Akt phosphorylation by wortmannin did not affect HGF-mediated suppression of
-SMA expression. However, blockade of Erk-1/2 activation by PD98059 restored TGF-
1induced
-SMA expression.
HGF Does Not Inhibit Smad Activation and Nuclear Translocation
To elucidate how HGF counteracts TGF-
1 in mesangial cells, we investigated the potential interplay between the signals triggered by HGF and TGF-
1. To this end, we first examined the effects of HGF on Smad2 phosphorylation, a critical step in TGF-
1mediated signal transduction pathway. As illustrated in Figure 3A, TGF-
1 induced Smad2 phosphorylation in mesangial cells. However, pretreatment with HGF did not affect Smad2 phosphorylation.
|
1 is subjected to regulation by HGF in renal interstitial fibroblasts (12). However, we found that HGF did not intercept Smad2 nuclear translocation, as there was no difference in phosphorylated Smad2 accumulation in the nuclei in the presence or absence of HGF (Figure 3B). Consistently, immunofluorescence staining showed that TGF-
1 induced Smad2 phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation (Figure 3D) and that HGF did not attenuate activated Smad2 nuclear accumulation (Figure 3E).
HGF Specifically Increases TGIF Abundance by Promoting Its Stability in Mesangial Cells
We next assessed the effects of HGF on the expression of Smad transcriptional corepressors in mesangial cells. As presented in Figure 4A, HGF induced TGIF protein abundance in rat mesangial cells, which peaked as early as 1 h after HGF stimulation. Under the same conditions, HGF failed to affect significantly the expression of SnoN and Ski in mesangial cells, two other members of Smad transcriptional corepressor family (Figure 4, B and C). HGF also upregulated the TGIF protein level in human mesangial cells, and the TGIF protein level started to increase at 0.5 h after HGF treatment and was sustained at least to 24 h (Figure 4D).
|
Figure 4G shows that HGF induction of TGIF protein abundance was dependent on Erk-1/2 activation. Preincubation of mesangial cells with PD98059 completely abolished HGF-mediated TGIF induction, suggesting that Erk-1/2 activation is required for mediating TGIF stabilization. Of note, HGF was capable of inducing TGIF expression even in the presence of TGF-
1 (Figure 4G).
TGIF Forms Complexes with Smad and Blocks Smad-Mediated Gene Transcription
Figure 5, A and B, shows that the TGIF protein induced by HGF was predominantly localized in the nuclei, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining. Thus, TGIF clearly co-localizes with activated Smad after TGF-
1 stimulation (Figure 3D). This prompted us to examine a potential interaction between TGIF and Smad in mesangial cells after co-incubation with HGF and TGF-
1. To this end, mesangial cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-TGIF antibody, followed by immunoblotting with Smad4. As shown in Figure 5C, Smad4 was detected in the immunoprecipitates of the cells treated with HGF and TGF-
1. Of note, treatment of mesangial cells with TGF-
1 alone resulted in no TGIF/Smad4 complex. Likewise, no TGIF/Smad complex formation was evident when the cells were preincubated with PD98059 to abolish TGIF induction (Figure 5C).
|
1 signaling, we examined the effects of TGIF on Smad-mediated gene transcription by transient transfection of TGIF. Rat mesangial cells were transfected with p3TP-Lux, a TGF-
1responsive luciferase reporter plasmid that has been widely used in examining TGF-
1 responsiveness (23,24). As shown in Figure 5D, TGF-
1 significantly increased the luciferase reporter activity of p3TP-Lux. Co-transfection with TGIF repressed both basal and TGF-
1induced luciferase activity, suggesting that increased TGIF can abrogate endogenous Smad-mediated gene transcription in mesangial cells.
When Smad were overexpressed in mesangial cells after transient transfection of both Smad2 and Smad3 expression vectors, luciferase activity of p3TP-Lux reporter was increased in the absence or presence of TGF-
1 (Figure 5D), suggesting that Smad play an important role in mediating the promoter activity. Finally, ectopic expression of TGIF also suppressed the gene transcription activated by overexpressed Smad2/3 in mesangial cells with or without TGF-
1 stimulation (Figure 5D). Similar results were obtained when the cells were co-transfected with Smad3 (Figure 5E).
Ectopic Expression of TGIF Abolishes TGF-
1Initiated Mesangial Cell Activation
To investigate further the potential role of TGIF in mediating the antifibrotic action of HGF, we examined the effect of TGIF on TGF-
1induced mesangial cell activation. As shown in Figure 6A, transient transfection of mesangial cells with pHA-TGIF resulted in robust TGIF expression. Figure 6B shows the results of Western blot analysis for
-SMA expression in mesangial cells at different time points after TGF-
1 treatment. In rat mesangial cells transfected with empty vector pcDNA3, TGF-
1 induced
-SMA expression in a time-dependent manner. However, forced expression of TGIF by transfection completely abolished TGF-
1induced
-SMA expression.
|
70% in diabetic glomeruli at 12 wk after streptozotocin injection (Figure 7, A and B). Delivery of exogenous HGF via naked plasmid vector induced TGIF protein expression, leading to almost complete restoration of the TGIF level in the glomeruli of diabetic kidney (Figure 7).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 in vitro. Furthermore, we show that HGF counteracts TGF-
1s activity by upregulating Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF, a functional antagonist that specifically represses TGF-
1mediated Smad signaling (32). Such findings are consistent with in vivo observations demonstrating that HGF blocks mesangial activation and glomerular sclerotic lesions in diabetic kidney (16,17). This study provides novel insights into understanding the mechanism by which HGF antagonizes the profibrotic action of TGF-
1 in mesangial cells. Our results further establish a cellular and molecular basis for the therapeutic application of exogenous HGF in mitigating diabetic renal insufficiency.
It has been widely recognized that hyperactive TGF-
1 signaling plays a central role in mesangial cell activation and development of diabetic nephropathy (6,9,33). TGF-
1 expression is markedly induced in the glomeruli of diabetic kidney (6,8,16). The signal of TGF-
1 is transduced through its type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors (7,34,35) and tightly controlled by multiple negative regulatory mechanisms at different levels (36). In extracellular compartments, decorin, a proteoglycan associated with matrix components, binds to active TGF-
1 and prevents it from engaging with its receptors (37). In the cytoplasm, inhibitory Smad7 competes with receptor-regulated Smad to bind to activated type I receptor, thereby attenuating receptor-regulated Smad activation (38,39), or recruits GADD34-PP1c complex to dephosphorylate and inactivate TGF-
type I receptor (40). Once inside the nuclei, activated Smad may bind to Smad transcriptional corepressors by forming transcriptionally inactive complexes (32). Thus, the abundance of corepressors in a given cell may determine an ultimate cellular response after TGF-
1 stimulation. In view of the fact that Smad phosphorylation and nuclear translocation are intact after HGF treatment (Figure 3), the inhibitory action of HGF on TGF-
1 signal is unlikely to operate at a prenuclear stage. Rather, it seems to operate at Smad transcriptional corepressor levels by upregulating TGIF protein abundance. This observation underlines that HGF specifically targets one of key regulatory steps in TGF-
1 signaling in mesangial cells.
HGF and TGF-
1, through their respective tyrosine kinase receptor and serine/threonine kinase receptors, trigger distinct signal transduction pathways in virtually every type of kidney cell (7,41,42). Our present study suggests a unique mode of interaction in which HGF signal cross-talks with TGF-
1 via TGIF and provides a potential link between the signals that activated by antifibrotic HGF and profibrotic TGF-
1. Of interest, upregulation of TGIF by HGF likely occurs at posttranscriptional levels by stabilizing its protein from degradation. This notion is supported by a rapid induction of TGIF, as well as by lack of significant induction of TGIF mRNA level after HGF stimulation in mesangial cells (Figure 4). Such posttranscriptional regulation of TGIF, in contrast to de novo expression, makes it possible for HGF to control TGF-
1 signaling in an expeditious manner. The mechanism underlying TGIF stabilization by HGF in mesangial cells remains unsolved; however, it is clearly dependent on Erk-1/2 activation (Figure 4G). Consistent with this, a previous report indicated that epidermal growth factormediated Erk-1/2 can directly phosphorylate TGIF protein in human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) (25). Such phosphorylation of TGIF promotes its stabilization and favors the formation of Smad2/TGIF complexes in response to TGF-
1 (25).
TGIF is a short-lived protein that undergoes rapid degradation (25), and its stabilization by HGF leads to an overall and rapid build-up in the steady-state level in mesangial cells (Figure 4). The increased TGIF, via forming complexes with activated Smad, sequesters the ability of Smad to initiate the transcription of TGF-
1responsive genes and overrides the profibrotic action of TGF-
1 in mesangial cells (Figures 5 and 6
). In addition to binding to activated Smad to make them transcriptionally inactive (32), TGIF may exert its repressive activity by other mechanisms. It has been shown that TGIF can directly bind to DNA via TGIF binding site (43) or interact with other transcriptional repressors such as mSin3 and recruits it to TGF-
activated Smad complexes (44). Further studies are needed to clarify whether a single or multiple mechanisms are involved in mediating TGIF repression of TGF-
1activated gene expression in mesangial cells.
Because TGIF is expressed in the glomeruli of normal kidney (Figure 7), profibrotic TGF-
1 signaling is presumably confined by TGIF under normal conditions in vivo. That TGIF expression is reduced in the diabetic glomeruli suggests that TGF-
1 signal is profoundly amplified, as a result of the loss of one key negative regulatory mechanism. It should be noted that this occurs concurrently with an increased TGF-
1 expression in the diabetic kidney. Hence, the profibrotic TGF-
1 signal is virtually transduced without negative control in the kidney in the diabetic state. In this regard, restoration of TGIF expression in the diabetic glomeruli by HGF would reinstate the negative controlling mechanism governing TGF-
1s action in vivo (Figure 7). Indeed, HGF-mediated restoration of TGIF expression is associated with inhibition of mesangial activation and attenuation of diabetic nephropathy in mice (16).
It is worthwhile to point out that the interplay between HGF and TGF-
1 signal transduction pathways occurs in different renal cells in a dissimilar way. Studies show that HGF is able to counteract TGF-
1 activity in diverse types of kidney cell, including mesangial cells, interstitial fibroblasts, and tubular epithelial cells (12,13). Whereas HGF stabilizes TGIF in mesangial cells, it does not affect this corepressor abundance in interstitial fibroblasts (12) and tubular epithelial cells (unpublished data). This suggests that HGF-mediated stabilization of TGIF protein is cell content dependent. Earlier studies showed that HGF also antagonizes TGF-
1 actions in interstitial fibroblasts, which is evidently mediated by intercepting activated Smad2/3 nuclear translocation (12). Such signal interception would prevent the Smad from direct access to the cis-acting DNA element for Smad binding, thereby incapacitating Smad-mediated transcription of TGF-
1responsive genes (12,45). Regardless the mechanisms involved, that HGF is capable of counteracting profibrotic actions of TGF-
1 in various kidney cells by diverse strategies underscores a remarkable capacity of HGF as an endogenous antifibrotic factor in the pathogenesis of chronic renal fibrosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 signaling in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 26002610, 2002
1, through attenuation of connective tissue growth factor induction, and prevents renal fibrogenesis in 5/6 nephrectomized mice. FASEB J 17: 268270, 2003
1 production by HGF in attenuation of murine diabetic nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F134F143, 2004
-inducible antagonist of TGF-beta signalling. Nature 389: 631635, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
/Smad signaling by oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev 13: 804816, 1999This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kroening, S. Solomovitch, M. Sachs, B. Wullich, and M. Goppelt-Struebe Regulation of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) by hepatocyte growth factor in human tubular epithelial cells Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; (2008) gfn530v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Giannopoulou, C. Dai, X. Tan, X. Wen, G. K. Michalopoulos, and Y. Liu Hepatocyte Growth Factor Exerts Its Anti-Inflammatory Action by Disrupting Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Signaling Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 173(1): 30 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tan, W. He, X. Lin, L. P. Kiss, and Y. Liu Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor-2 in the fibrotic kidney: regulation, target specificity, and functional implication Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1076 - F1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mishra, B. L. Cool, K. R. Laderoute, M. Foretz, B. Viollet, and M. S. Simonson AMP-activated Protein Kinase Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-induced Smad3-dependent Transcription and Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10461 - 10469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mishra and M. S. Simonson Oleate Induces a Myofibroblast-Like Phenotype in Mesangial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 541 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aydin, S. Signorelli, T. Lechleitner, M. Joannidis, C. Pleban, P. Perco, W. Pfaller, and P. Jennings Influence of microvascular endothelial cells on transcriptional regulation of proximal tubular epithelial cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): C543 - C554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tan, X. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Li, and Y. Liu Molecular Basis for the Cell Type Specific Induction of SnoN Expression by Hepatocyte Growth Factor J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2340 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoshikawa, K. Hishikawa, T. Marumo, and T. Fujita Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Activity Suppresses Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by TGF-beta1 in Human Renal Epithelial Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tan, J. Zhang, X. Tan, X. Zhang, J. Yang, and Y. Liu Downregulation of SnoN Expression in Obstructive Nephropathy Is Mediated by an Enhanced Ubiquitin-Dependent Degradation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 2781 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Giannopoulou, S. C. Iszkula, C. Dai, X. Tan, J. Yang, G. K. Michalopoulos, and Y. Liu Distinctive role of Stat3 and Erk-1/2 activation in mediating interferon-{gamma} inhibition of TGF-beta1 action Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1234 - F1240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, X. Wen, B. C. Spataro, K. Hu, C. Dai, and Y. Liu Hepatocyte Growth Factor Is a Downstream Effector that Mediates the Antifibrotic Action of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonists J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 54 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wen, Y. Li, K. Hu, C. Dai, and Y. Liu Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Mediates the Anti-Fibrotic Action of 9-cis-Retinoic Acid in Glomerular Mesangial Cells Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 947 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moustakas and C.-H. Heldin Non-Smad TGF-{beta} signals J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2005; 118(16): 3573 - 3584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, C. Dai, and Y. Liu A Novel Mechanism by which Hepatocyte Growth Factor Blocks Tubular Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 68 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text |