Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 95-102, 2005
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060666

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qunibi, W. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qunibi, W. Y.

Current Controversies in Managing End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Reducing the Burden of Cardiovascular Calcification in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Wajeh Y. Qunibi

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Address correspondence to: Dr. Wajeh Y. Qunibi, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. Phone: 210-422-2692; Fax: 210-358-4710; E-mail: qunibi{at}uthscsa.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a higher burden of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease compared with age- and gender-matched individuals with normal renal function. Cardiovascular calcification (CVC), a marker of atherosclerosis, is also more prevalent in these patients and is associated with serious clinical consequences. The pathogenesis of CVC is complex and includes factors that promote calcification and others that inhibit calcification. Thus, multiple therapeutic interventions should be used simultaneously to reduce the burden of calcification in patients with CKD. Thus far, interventional attempts have focused on curtailing the effects of factors that promote calcification such as management of known traditional factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and on adopting specific approaches to normalize mineral metabolism, deliver adequate dialysis, and control serum cholesterol level. By contrast, interventions that may bolster the effects of inhibitors of calcification have not yet been studied well but are beginning to attract attention. Ideally, the goal of interventions is not only to slow or halt progression of calcification but also to reverse pre-existing calcification. Whether this goal is achievable is not currently known. This review examines the potential of various therapeutic interventions in reducing the CVC burden in patients with CKD. Moreover, the review is intended to stimulate more research in this area because the efficacy of these interventions has not been examined in controlled clinical trials.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Coronary artery calcification (CAC), which is absent in normal vessels, represents an integral part of the atherosclerotic plaque (1). Detection and quantification of arterial calcification now can be easily achieved by the use of newer imaging techniques such as electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multislice computed tomography (2,3). In the general population, coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as measured by EBCT was found to be an independent predictor of subsequent cardiac events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (3,4).

The pathogenesis of CVC is complex and includes factors that promote calcification and others that inhibit calcification (Tables 1 and 2). Several studies have clearly established that the prevalence and the extent of CVC are increased in patients with ESRD (58). The mechanisms that are responsible for CVC in patients with ESRD are still being debated and have been reviewed previously in detail (9). Briefly, cross-sectional studies in dialysis patients have shown a correlation between CAC and a number of uremia-related factors such as dialysis vintage, hyperphosphatemia, high calcium (Ca) x phosphorus (P) product, vitamin D therapy, and the prescribed daily dose of Ca-based phosphate binders (CBPB) (59).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Promoters of vascular calcification

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Inhibitors of vascular calcificationa

 

    Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Calcification of the aorta and other large vessels previously has been considered a benign process without serious clinical consequences. However, several clinical studies have shown clearly that calcification of various cardiovascular structures may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Calcification of the cardiac valves may lead to heart failure, coronary ischemia, arrhythmias, valve stenosis, increased risk for infective endocarditis, and thromboembolic events (10). Moreover, valve calcification was shown to be independently predictive of increased all-cause mortality as well as cardiovascular death (10). Calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arteriolopathy, a form of medial calcification, is associated with very high risk for death (11). Moreover, medial arterial calcification often leads to stiffening and decreased compliance of blood vessels, which in turn leads to increased systolic BP, reduced diastolic BP, and increased pulse pressure (12). These hemodynamic changes may result in increased afterload, left ventricular hypertrophy, decreased coronary artery perfusion, and increased risk for death (13). Finally, CAC has been linked to increased risk for cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, fatal arrhythmia, and congestive heart failure (9,14,15). Given that CVC may lead to serious clinical consequences, it is possible that interventions that are designed to slow or even reverse the process of calcification may lead to improved patient outcomes.


    Interventions Designed to Reduce CVC in Patients with CKD
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Theoretically, for any intervention to reduce CVC, it should curtail the influence of factors that promote calcification and/or augment the effects of factors that inhibit calcification. Unfortunately, such interventions have not been investigated in controlled clinical trials. Therefore, the potential beneficial role of some of these interventions on CVC must be considered speculative at this time. Hopefully, future interventional clinical studies will be designed to examine more carefully the role of these factors in reducing the burden of CVC in calcification-prone CKD patients (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Interventions that may reduce cardiovascular calcification

 

    Curbing Effects of Factors that Promote Vascular Calcification
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Control of Hyperphosphatemia, Hypercalcemia, and Ca x P Product
Disturbances in serum P, Ca, and Ca x P product are frequently seen in patients with CKD and have been implicated in promoting CVC as well as in increased risk for death (9,16). High P levels stimulate osteoblastic differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells and directly enhance extracellular calcification by these cells (17). Given that hyperphosphatemia is common in dialysis patients and that it plays a key role in the increased risk for CVC, it is conceivable that control of serum P may result in reduced burden of CVC in these patients and improve outcomes.

Because dietary restriction of P and intermittent dialysis are not usually effective in controlling serum P, most dialysis patients require dietary phosphate binders (18). CBPB such as Ca acetate and Ca carbonate have replaced aluminum hydroxide as the most widely prescribed phosphate binders. Although cost-effective, recent concern over the possible role of Ca loading from these binders in progression of CVC has led to more frequent use of the considerably more expensive noncalcium, nonaluminum phosphate binder sevelamer hydrochloride (Renagel) (710). This concern became more widespread after the publication of the Treat to Goal Study, which showed a 25% increase in the coronary Ca scores among the patients who were treated with Ca salts compared with a 6% increment in the sevelamer group and a similar difference in aortic artery calcification scores. However, the mechanism of the beneficial effect of sevelamer on progression of calcification is unknown. One possible mechanism is reduced Ca loading during treatment with sevelamer. However, reduced cardiovascular calcification may also result from dramatic reductions in total and LDL cholesterol, which occur during treatment with this bile acid sequestrant. Moreover, results of the Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE), a randomized, double-blind trial, demonstrated that Ca acetate is significantly more effective than sevelamer in controlling serum P and Ca x P product to the recommended goal levels (19). Thus, it is conceivable that Ca acetate might in fact reduce the risk for CVC and mortality in dialysis patients as a result of better control of both serum P and Ca x P product. Clearly, more studies on the role of Ca loading from CBPB in progression of CVC are needed before prematurely abandoning these cost-effective binders.

Control of Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia, particularly increased LDL, has been implicated in progression of CAC (2023). In addition, the beneficial effect of lowering LDL cholesterol levels on progression of calcification in the general population has been reported by several groups (2123). Callister et al. (22) demonstrated that treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors can reduce the volume of calcified plaque in the coronary arteries (Figure 1). At the follow-up EBCT scans, a net reduction in the Ca-volume score of 7% was observed only in treated patients whose final LDL cholesterol levels were <120 mg/dl (P < 0.01). Moreover, in the only prospective study on the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of CAC, Achenbach et al. (23) found that treatment with the cholesterol-synthesis enzyme inhibitor cerivastatin significantly reduced coronary artery Ca progression in patients with LDL cholesterol levels >130 mg/dl (Figure 2). The median annual relative increase in coronary Ca was 25% during the untreated period versus 8.8% during the treatment period (P < 0.0001).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Reduction of LDL cholesterol to <120 mg/dl resulted in halting progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC). {square}, Initial values; {blacksquare}, final values for coronary artery Ca volume scores. As can be seen, patients in group 1 who were not treated with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor had significant progression of CAC. Similarly, patients in group 2 who were also treated but their average LDL cholesterol levels remained >120 mg/dl had significant progression of calcification. Patients in group 3 who were treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and their average LDL cholesterol levels were successfully reduced to <120 mg/dl had no progression of calcification. Reprinted from reference (29), with permission.

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. (A) Reduction of progression of CAC during treatment with a cholesterol-synthesis enzyme inhibitor cerivastatin. The figure shows the annualized relative change of the calcium volume score during the untreated period (electron-beam tomography [EBT] 1 to EBT 2) and during the treatment period (EBT 2 to EBT 3) for all 66 patients. Despite interindividual variation, the median annualized relative change (bold line) was significantly lowered by cerivastatin (25 versus 8.8%; P < 0.0001). (B) Annualized relative change of the calcium volume score in 32 patients who achieved an LDL cholesterol level <100 mg/dl during treatment with cerivastatin. In these patients, the median annualized change (bold line) decreased from 27% to –3.4% (P = 0.0001). Reprinted from reference (64), with permission.

 
Results of the Treat to Goal Study (8) suggest that lowering the LDL level in patients with ESRD may also result in amelioration of progression of CVC. Patients who were treated with sevelamer had a significant decrease in their plasma LDL cholesterol levels from 102 to 65 mg/dl during the study period, whereas the LDL levels did not change in patients who were treated with CBPB. Therefore, it is possible that the slower rate of progression of cardiovascular calcification observed in the Treat to Goal Study may have resulted from the significant lowering of the LDL level by sevelamer. Two other studies underscore the role of dyslipidemia in the pathogenesis of CVC in patients with CKD. Nitta et al. (24) reported the results of their preliminary study from Japan, which showed that progression of aortic calcification in patients with ESRD was significantly retarded during treatment with colistimide (a bile acid sequestrant similar to sevelamer) in combination with atorvastatin compared with the period before treatment was initiated. Tamashiro et al. (25) reported that rapid progression of CAC in hemodialysis patients was associated with higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol levels.

Control of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Vitamin D versus Calcimimetic Agents
The current treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in dialysis patients includes suppression of parathyroid hormone secretion with supraphysiologic doses of vitamin D or its analogues. Unfortunately, vitamin D may predispose to vascular calcification. Rats that were treated with high-dose vitamin D developed calcification in the aorta, carotid, hepatic, mesenteric, renal, and femoral arteries (26). Clinical studies have also reported an association between vascular calcification and use of vitamin D therapy in hyperphosphatemic patients with renal failure (27,28). Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) have been shown to express vitamin D receptors (29). Although vitamin D inhibits VSMC proliferation by enhancing Ca flux into cells, it induces VSMC to exhibit an osteoblastic phenotype (29). Vitamin D has also been shown to increase calcification in VSMC in vitro (30). Moreover, vitamin D therapy enhances the intestinal absorption of Ca and P and, therefore, often results in hypercalcemia, worsening hyperphosphatemia, and increased Ca x P product. Thus, although effective in reducing the severity of SHPT, vitamin D may increase the risk for CVC.

The new calcimimetic agents offer several advantages over vitamin D with respect to CVC. They prevent or treat SHPT without increasing serum Ca, P, or Ca x PO4 product (31). Moreover, they have no adverse effects on vascular calcification. Although no clinical studies have demonstrated such a beneficial effect, preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies indicated that, compared with vitamin D, calcimimetic agents do not enhance aortic calcification (3234). These effects, if confirmed in clinical studies, may result in the preferential use of calcimimetic agents to slow or halt progression of CVC in patients with CKD.

Treatment of Hypertension with Ca Channel Blockers
Several clinical trials in the general population have suggested a therapeutic or prophylactic effect of Ca channel blockers (CCB) on the progression of the atherosclerotic process (3537). In the PREVENT study, the CCB amlodipine was found to reduce intimal medial thickness in type 2 diabetes (37). More recently, Motro and Shamesh (38) compared the effect of nifedipine and diuretics on progression of CAC in 201 hypertensive patients over a 3-yr period. They showed that CAC score increased by 40% in patients who were treated with nifedipine versus 78% on diuretics (P = 0.02). The effect was more pronounced in patients who had higher CAC scores at baseline. No similar studies have been reported in patients with CKD. Clearly, the effect of CCB on progression of CVC deserves further study, particularly in patients with CKD.

Role of Renal Transplantation
Cardiovascular mortality is clearly lower in renal transplant recipients than in dialysis patients (39,40). Moreover, the prevalence of CVC is also lower in renal transplant recipients than in dialysis patients (41). A preliminary study by Moe et al. (42) showed that CAC can be slowed or arrested after renal transplantation (Figure 3). A study by Stompor et al. (43) also showed no progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients compared with peritoneal dialysis patients. There are a number of potential mechanisms by which renal transplantation reduces the burden of CVC: First, renal transplantation restores renal function and therefore eliminates the role of uremic toxins in promoting CVC. Second, because baseline CAC scores in renal transplant recipients are dependent on the duration of dialysis (44), transplantation may reduce the burden of calcification by shortening the duration of dialysis. Third, renal transplantation may improve some disorders of mineral metabolism. Indeed, hypophosphatemia, rather than hyperphosphatemia, may develop in renal transplant recipients with normal graft function. Further studies designed to examine the role of renal transplantation in ameliorating CVC are clearly needed.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Change in coronary artery calcium score over time. The changes in CAC in transplant recipients (A) and hemodialysis patients (B) are plotted for individual patients who had calcification at baseline. Reprinted from reference (53), with permission.

 

    Augmenting Effects of Factors that Inhibit Vascular Calcification
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Although CVC is very common in patients with CKD, it is conspicuously absent in approximately 17% of patients despite similar exposure to factors that promote calcification (45). Moreover, patients who do not have detectable vascular calcification rarely develop calcification on follow-up studies (46). Because the physiologic concentrations of Ca and P in human serum, particularly in patients with ESRD, are far above their solubility product and therefore should precipitate immediately, inhibitors of precipitation of these ions must be playing a major role in preventing extraosseous calcification.

Several animal knockout models have shown that the Ca-regulatory factors matrix Gla protein (MGP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and fetuin-A ({alpha}2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein-Ahsg) may be protective from vascular calcification (4649). Mice deficient in MGP or OPG develop spontaneous vascular calcification (48). Similarly, mice deficient in fetuin-A also develop severe ectopic calcification when fed a mineral- and vitamin D–rich diet or when fed a normal diet when combined with a DBA/2 genetic background (49). Unfortunately, the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors of calcification has not been explored in clinical trials. However, because MGP requires vitamin K for {gamma}-carboxylation, acquired vitamin K deficiency, as with the use of warfarin, may predispose to vascular calcification (50). It is interesting that calciphylaxis, or calcific uremic arteriolopathy, has been reported with increasing frequency in patients who are treated with warfarin therapy (11). Thus, it is possible that by avoiding the use of warfarin in patients with CKD, the risk for CVC may be reduced by not interfering in the production of MGP.

Similarly, OPG knockout mice develop osteoporosis and severe vascular calcification (48). This observation indicates that OPG is an important inhibitor of calcification of blood vessel walls. Paradoxically, serum OPG levels are associated with the extent of vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients (46,51). This may be a compensatory, protective response to the progression of vascular calcification or due to the effect of OPG on decreasing bone turnover, thus impairing the ability of bone to buffer Ca load (46). It is interesting that a study by Price et al. (52) showed that subcutaneous doses of OPG that inhibited bone resorption in rats were effective in inhibiting arterial calcification induced by warfarin or vitamin D.

Finally, fetuin-A has also been shown to be a potent systemic inhibitor of calcification, accounting for approximately 50% of the precipitation inhibitory capacity of serum (49,53). Hemodialysis patients have lower levels of fetuin-A compared with control subjects with normal renal function (53). The effect of restoring fetuin-A levels in dialysis patients on progression of CVC has not been reported but potentially could represent an attractive therapeutic modality.

Inhibitors of Bone Resorption
Clinical and experimental studies have consistently established an association between arterial calcification and bone resorption (5456). Consequently, it can be hypothesized that treatment strategies that reduce bone resorption and increase bone mineralization may simultaneously decrease the risk for vascular calcification. Indeed, several preliminary studies have shown a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates and other inhibitors of bone resorption on vascular calcification (54,57).

Etidronate was shown previously to inhibit vitamin D–induced arterial calcification in rats (58,59). Other bisphosphonates, such as ibandronate and alendronate, also inhibited arterial and cardiac valve calcification after 2 and 4 wk in a warfarin-induced ectopic calcification model (50,54). The effect of intermittent etidronate therapy on progression of vascular calcification was recently reported in 35 hemodialysis patients (Figure 4) (59). In that study, three courses of etidronate, 200 mg/d for 14 d every 3 mo, significantly suppressed CAC progression with no change in bone mineral density. This effect was associated with a decrease in both C-reactive protein and serum OPG levels.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Axial cross-section obtained by spiral computed tomography in a 73-yr-old patient at baseline (A) and after cyclic intermittent etidronate therapy (B). Reprinted from reference (59), with permission.

 

    Other Interventions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Aged garlic extracts (AGE), which have antioxidant properties, have the ability to reduce several cardiovascular risk factors, such as BP, serum cholesterol, and platelet aggregation and adhesion, while stimulating nitric oxide generation in endothelial cells (60). As a result, these may improve peripheral circulation. Thus, it has been claimed that AGE impart cardiovascular benefits. It is interesting that a recent small pilot study by Budoff et al. (60) showed that, compared with placebo, AGE may inhibit the rate of progression of CAC in the general population. The mechanism is probably related to their ability to inhibit atherosclerosis (61).


    Genetic Susceptibility or Immunity
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
Limited evidence suggests that CAC has strong genetic determinants (62). Possibly, some genes are procalcification genes, whereas others are anticalcification (protective) genes. Little is known about these CAC susceptibility genes, and it is vitally important to identify and characterize these genes by identifying the chromosomal regions that harbor them. The identification of susceptibility genes for CAC should increase the knowledge about CVD risk for a given patient and help to identify those for whom intensive preventive or therapeutic measures may be most beneficial.


    Can Cardiovascular Calcification Be Reversed?
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 
So far, the goal of most interventional studies has been to slow or halt progression of CVC. However, whether calcification can realistically be reversed, particularly in patients with CKD, is not known at the present time. It is interesting that several studies have indicated that reversal of calcification may indeed be possible. Callister et al. (29) reported regression of Ca volume score in 63% of 65 patients with LDL levels <120 mg/dl. In another study of 102 symptomatic patients with CAC, Schmermund et al. (20) reported that standard therapy for coronary artery disease resulted in regression of calcification in 15% of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease on follow-up EBCT scans. Although it is possible that regression of calcification may be due to interscan variability, these authors speculated that reduction of calcification may be the result of shrinkage and increased density of the calcified lesions. Given that CAC may be predictive of cardiovascular events and death from CVD, interventions designed to induce regression of calcification may help to reduce the risk for death in patients with CKD and coronary artery disease.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Clinical Consequences of CVC
 Interventions Designed to Reduce...
 Curbing Effects of Factors...
 Augmenting Effects of Factors...
 Other Interventions
 Genetic Susceptibility or...
 Can Cardiovascular Calcification...
 References
 

  1. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J, Detrano R, Fuster V, Maddahi J, Rumberger J, Stanford W, White R, Taubert K: Coronary artery calcification: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. Circulation 94 : 1175 –1192, 1996[Free Full Text]
  2. Wong ND, Vo A, Abrahamson D, Tobis JM, Eisenberg H, Detrano RC: Detection of coronary artery calcium by ultrafast computed tomography and its relation to clinical evidence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 73 : 223 –227, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ, Kondos G: Electron beam computed tomographic coronary artery calcium scanning: A review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 74 : 243 –252, 1999[Medline]
  4. Wayhs R, Zelinger A, Raggi P: High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events. J Am Coll Cardiol 39 : 225 –230, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Braun J, Oldendorf M, Moshage W, Heidler R, Zeitler E, Luft FC: Electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiac calcification in chronic dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 27 : 394 –401, 1996[Medline]
  6. Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, Yoon C, Gales B, Sider D, Wang Y, Chung J, Emerick A, Greaser L, Elashoff RM, Salusky IB: Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med 342 : 1478 –1483, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Guerin AP, London GM, Marchais SJ, Metivier F: Arterial stiffening and vascular calcifications in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15 : 1014 –1021, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chertow GM, Burke SK, Raggi P; for the Treat to Goal Working Group: Sevelamer attenuates the progression of coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 62 : 245 –252, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Qunibi WY, Nolan CR, Ayus JC: Cardiovascular calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease: A century-old phenomenon. Kidney Int 82[Suppl] : 73 –80, 2002
  10. Qunibi WY: Consequences of hyperphosphatemia. Kidney Int 66[Suppl 90] : S8 –S12, 2004[CrossRef]
  11. Moe SM: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy: A new look at an old disorder. NephSAP 3 : 77 –83, 2004
  12. London GM, Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Metivier F, Adda H: Arterial structure and function in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17 : 1713 –1724, 2002[Free Full Text]
  13. London GM, Guerin AP, Marchais AJ, Metivier F, Pannier B, Adda H: Arterial media calcification in end-stage renal disease: Impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18 : 1731 –1740, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lehto S, Niskanen L, Suhonen L, Ronnemaa T, Laakso M: Medial artery calcification. A neglected harbinger of cardiovascular complications in non insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16 : 978 –983, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Raggi P, Boulay A, Chasan-Taber S, Amin N, Dillon M, Burke SK, Chertow GM: Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 39 : 695 –701, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus ML, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM: Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 15 : 2208 –2218, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jono S, McKee MD, Murry CE, Shioi A, Nishizawa Y, Mori K, Morii H, Giachelli CM: Phosphate regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. Circ Res 87 : e10 –e17, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Emmett M. A comparison of clinically useful phosphorus binders for patients with chronic kidney failure. Kidney Int 66 [Suppl 90] : S25 –S32, 2004
  19. Qunibi WY, Hootkins RE, McDowell LL, Meyer MS, Simon M, Garza RO, Pelham RW, Cleveland MV, Muenz LR, He DY, Nolan CR: Treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: The Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE study). Kidney Int 65 : 1914 –1926, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Mohlenkamp S, Kriener P, Pump H, Gronemeyer D, Seibel R, Erbel R: Natural history and topographic pattern of progression of coronary calcification in symptomatic patients: An electron-beam CT study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21 : 421 –426, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Budoff MJ, Lane KL, Bakhsheshi H, Mao S, Grassmann BO, Friedman BC, Brundage BH: Rates of progression of coronary calcium by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 86 : 8 –11, 2000[Medline]
  22. Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ: Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med 339 : 1972 –1978, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle K, Leber A, Thilo C, Knez A, Menendez T, Maeffert R, Kusus M, Regenfus M, Bickel A, Haberl R, Steinbeck G, Moshage W, Daniel WG: Influence of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of coronary artery calcification: A prospective evaluation. Circulation 106 : 1077 –1082, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Nitta K, Akiba T, Nihei H: Colestimide co-administered with atorvastatin attenuates the progression of vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 : 2156 , 2004[Free Full Text]
  25. Tamashiro M, Iseki K, Sunagawa O, Inoue T, Higa S, Afuso H, Fukiyama K: Significant association between the progression of coronary artery calcification and dyslipidemia in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 38 : 64 –69, 2001[Medline]
  26. Price PA, Buckley JR, Williamson MK: The amino bisphosphonate ibandronate prevents vitamin D toxicity and inhibits vitamin D-induced calcification of arteries, cartilage, lungs, and kidneys in rats. J Nutr 131 : 2910 –2915, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Mallick NP, Berlyne GM: Arterial calcification after vitamin-D therapy in hyperphosphatemic renal failure. Lancet 2 : 1316 –1320, 1968[Medline]
  28. Milliner DS, Zinsmeister AR, Leiberman E, Landing B: Soft tissue calcification in pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 38 : 931 –936, 1990[Medline]
  29. Merke J, Hofmann W, Goldschmidt D, Ritz E: Demonstration of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 receptors and actions in vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 41 : 112 –114, 1987[Medline]
  30. Jono S, Nishizawa Y, Shioi A, Morii H: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases in vitro vascular calcification by modulating secretion of endogenous parathyroid hormone-related peptide. Circulation 98 : 1302 –1306, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Block GA, Martin KJ, de Francisco AL, Turner SA, Avram MM, Suranyi MG, Hercz G, Cunningham J, Abu-Alfa AK, Messa P, Coyne DW, Locatelli F, Cohen RM, Evenepoel P, Moe SM, Fournier A, Braun J, McCary LC, Zani VJ, Olson KA, Drueke TB, Goodman WG: Cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 350 : 1516 –1525, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shalhoub et al.: Calcitriol but not cinacalcet mediates calcification of bovine aortic SMC. J Am Soc Nephrol 15 : 281A , 2004
  33. Henley C, Colloton M, Cattley R, Shatzen E, Towler DA, Lacey D, Martin D: 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 but not cinacalcet HCl (Sensipar/Mimpara) mediates aortic mineralization in a rat model of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20 : 1370 –1377, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Rodriguez et al.: Calcimimetic NPS R-568 decrease vascular calcification in 5/6 nephrectomized rats with SHPT treated with calcitriol. J Am Soc Nephrol 15 : 279A , 2004
  35. Lichtlen PR, Hugenholtz PG, Rafflenbeul W, Hecker H, Jost S, Deckers JW: Retardation of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by nifedipine: Results of the International Nifedipine Trial on Atherosclerotic Therapy (INTACT). Lancet 335 : 1109 –1113, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Waters D, Lesperance J, Fracetich M: A controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of a calcium channel blocker on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 82 : 1940 –1953, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Koshiyama H, Tanaka S, Minamikawa J: Effect of calcium channel blocker amlodipine on the intimal-medial thickness of carotid arterial wall in type 2 diabetes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 33 : 894 –896, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Motro M, Shemesh J: Calcium channel blocker nifedipine slows down progression of coronary calcification in hypertensive patients compared with diuretics. Hypertension 37 : 1410 –1413, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wolfe RA, Ashby VP, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341 : 1725 –1730, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kendrick E: Cardiovascular disease and the renal transplant recipient. Am J Kidney Dis 38[Suppl 6] : S36 –S43, 2001
  41. Oh J, Wunsch R, Turzer M, Bahner M, Raggi P, Querfeld U, Mehls O, Schaefer F: Advanced coronary and carotid arteriolopathy in young adults with childhood-onset chronic renal failure. Circulation 106 : 100 –105, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Moe SM, O’Neill KD, Reslerove M, Fineberg N, Persohn S, Meyer CA: Natural history of vascular calcification in dialysis and transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 : 2387 –2393, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Stompor T, Pasowicz M, Sulowicz W, Dembinska-Kiec A, Tracz W: Trends in coronary artery calcification in peritoneal dialysis and transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 : 3205 –3206, 2004[Free Full Text]
  44. Moe SM, O’Neill KD, Fineberg N, Persohn S, Ahmed S, Garrett P, Meyer CA: Assessment of vascular calcification in ESRD patients using spiral CT. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18 : 1152 –1158, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hujairi NM, Afzali B, Goldsmith DJ: Cardiac calcification in renal patients: What we do and don’t know. Am J Kidney Dis 43 : 234 –243, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Moe SM, Reslerova M, Ketteler M, O’Neill K, Duan D, Koczman J, Westenfeld R, Jahnen-Dechent W, Chen NX: Role of calcification inhibitors in the pathogenesis of vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Kidney Int 67 : 2295 –2304, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Ketteler M, Wanner C, Metzger T, Bongartz P, Westenfeld R, Gladziwa U, Schurgers LJ, Vermeer C, Jahnen-Dechent W, Floege J: Deficiencies of calcium-regulatory proteins in dialysis patients: A novel concept of cardiovascular calcification in uremia. Kidney Int Suppl 84 : S84 –S87, 2003
  48. Luo G, Ducy P, McKee MD, Pinero GJ, Loyer E, Behringer RR, Karsenty G: Spontaneous calcification of arteries and cartilage in mice lacking matrix GLA protein. Nature 386 : 78 –81, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Schafer C, Heiss A, Schwarz A, Westenfeld R, Ketteler M, Floege J, Muller-Esterl W, Schinke T, Jahnen-Dechent W: The calcium alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is a systemically acting inhibitor of ectopic calcification. J Clin Invest 112 : 357 –366, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Price PA, Faus SA, Williamson MK: Warfarin-induced artery calcification is accelerated by growth and vitamin D. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20 : 317 –327, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Nitta K, Akiba T, Uchida K, Otsubo S, Takei T, Yumura W, Kabaya T, Nihei H: Serum osteoprotegerin levels and the extent of vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 : 1886 –1889, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Price AP, June HH, Buckley JR, Williansom MK: Osteoprotegerin inhibits artery calcification induced by warfarin and by vitamin D. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21 : 1610 –1616, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Ketteler M, Bongartz P, Westenfeld R, Wildberger JE, Mahnken AH, Bohm R, Metzger T, Wanner C, Jahnen-Dechent W, Floege J: Association of low fetuin-A (AHSG) concentrations in serum with cardiovascular mortality in patients on dialysis: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 361 : 827 –833, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Price PA, Faus SA, Williamson MK: The bisphosphonates alendronate and ibandronate inhibit artery calcification at doses comparable to those which inhibit bone resorption. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21 : 817 –824, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Frye MA, Melton LJ, Beyant SC, Fitzpatrick LA, Wahner HW, Schwartz RS, Riggs BL: Osteoporosis and calcification of the aorta. Bone Miner 19 : 185 –194, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O’Donnell CJ, Wilson PW: Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: The Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int 68 : 271 –276, 2001; erratum in Calcif Tissue Int 74: 208, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Monney P, Nguyen Q-V, Perroud H, Descombes E: Rapid improvement of calciphylaxis after intravenous pamidronate therapy in a patient with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 : 2130 –2132, 2004[Free Full Text]
  58. Kingma JGJ, Roy PE: Effect of 1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate on arterial calcinosis induced by hypervitaminosis D: A morphologic investigation. J Exp Pathol 71 : 145 –153, 1990
  59. Nitta K, Akiba T, Suzuki K, Uchida K, Watanabe R, Majima K, Aoki T, Nihei H: Effects of cyclic intermittent etidronate therapy on coronary artery calcification in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 44 : 680 –688, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Budoff MJ, Takasu J, Flores FR, Niihara Y, Lu B, Lau BH, Rosen RT, Amagase H: Inhibiting progression of coronary calcification using aged garlic extract in patients receiving statin therapy: A preliminary study. Prev Med 39 : 985 –991, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Campbell JH, Efendy JL, Smith NJ, Campbell GR: Molecular basis by which garlic suppresses atherosclerosis. J Nutr 131 : 1006S –1009S, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Lange LA, Lange EM, Bielak LF, Langefeld CD, Kardia SL, Royston P, Turner ST, Sheedy II PF, Boerwinkle E, Peyser PA: Autosomal genome-wide scan for coronary artery calcification loci in sibships at high risk for hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22 : 418 –423, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Honkanen, L. Kauppila, B. Wikstrom, P. L. Rensma, J.-M. Krzesinski, K. Aasarod, F. Verbeke, P. B. Jensen, P. Mattelaer, B. Volck, et al.
Abdominal aortic calcification in dialysis patients: results of the CORD study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2008; (2008) gfn403v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. L. Schiffrin, M. L. Lipman, and J. F.E. Mann
Chronic Kidney Disease: Effects on the Cardiovascular System
Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 85 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. N. Foley
Phosphorus Comes of Age as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor
Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2007; 167(9): 873 - 874.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. J. Schurgers, H. M. H. Spronk, B. A. M. Soute, P. M. Schiffers, J. G. R. DeMey, and C. Vermeer
Regression of warfarin-induced medial elastocalcinosis by high intake of vitamin K in rats
Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2823 - 2831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qunibi, W. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qunibi, W. Y.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP