| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Epidemiology and Outcomes |


,||
,||
* Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistic;
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital M9:01, Stockholm, Sweden;
Department of Urology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden;
The International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, Maryland; and || Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
Address correspondence to: Dr. Elisabeth Ejerblad, Department of Hematology, OTM, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46-18-611-00-00; Fax: +46-18-50-29-16; elisabeth.ejerblad{at}meb.ki.se
Received for publication June 20, 2005. Accepted for publication March 15, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 kg/m2) at age 20 was associated with a significant three-fold excess risk for CRF, relative to BMI <25. Obesity (BMI
30) among men and morbid obesity (BMI
35) among women anytime during lifetime was linked to three- to four-fold increases in risk. The strongest association was with diabetic nephropathy, but two- to three-fold risk elevations were observed for all major subtypes of CRF. Analyses that were confined to strata without hypertension or diabetes revealed a three-fold increased risk among patients who were overweight at age 20, whereas the two-fold observed risk elevation among those who had a highest lifetime BMI of >35 was statistically nonsignificant. Obesity seems to be an importantand potentially preventablerisk factor for CRF. Although hypertension and type 2 diabetes are important mediators, additional pathways also may exist. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obesity has been implicated as a possible risk factor for microalbuminuria in individuals with hypertension and diabetes (46), and body mass index (BMI) was positively associated with progression of IgA glomerulonephritis in a cohort study (7). Studies from the general population suggest that obesity also may be harmful to the kidneys in individuals without hypertension, diabetes, or preexisting renal disease (8,9). In the Framingham Offspring cohort (10), body mass was positively related to the odds of having a GFR in the fifth or lower percentile after long-term follow-up. Similarly, follow-up among participants in health screening programs in the United States (11) and Japan (12) demonstrated a significant positive relationship between BMI and risk for ESRD, although this association seemingly was confined to men in the Japanese study.
The aim of this study was to investigate the possible effects of body mass on the incidence of moderately severe CRF overall and by subtype. We obtained detailed anthropometric information in a nationwide, population-based, case-control study of incident preuremic CRF (13).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eligible as cases were all men and women whose serum creatinine level, for the first time and permanently, exceeded 3.4 mg/dl (300 µmol/L) and 2.8 mg/dl (250 µmol/L), respectively. For ensuring complete case ascertainment, all medical laboratories that covered inpatient and outpatient care in Sweden provided monthly lists of patients who had undergone serum creatinine testing any time during the entire study period. A second creatinine measurement, 3 mo after the first, was done to verify the chronicity. Local physicians who treat patients with renal diseases determined patients eligibility for the study by reviewing the medical records of patients with elevated serum creatinine levels. The diagnosis of underlying disease was based on the results of routine clinical evaluation. Patients with prerenal (e.g., severe heart failure) or postrenal (e.g., outlet obstruction) causes or with kidney transplants were ineligible. Of eligible cases, 16% refused or were too severely disabled to participate, and 6% had died, leaving 926 (78%) participants.
Control subjects, who were frequency-matched to cases according to age (±10 yr) and gender, were randomly selected from the 5.3 million Swedes in the study base, using the nationwide National Population Register. The control selection was carried out on three occasions during the ascertainment period. Of 1330 selected control subjects, 998 (75%) participated, 17% refused, 4% could not be reached, and 4% were too sick to participate. All study participants provided informed consent, and the regional ethics committees and Swedish Data Inspection Board approved the study protocol.
Data Collection
Study participants completed a mailed questionnaire about anthropometric measures (height; current weight; weight at ages 20, 40, and 60; and highest weight during lifetime), education, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use. During a subsequent face-to-face interview, professional interviewers from Statistics Sweden double-checked the questionnaires and obtained information on medical history, occupation, and analgesic use. Although blinding of the interviewers to case/control status of the participants was impossible, the interviewers were instructed to interact similarly with case patients and control subjects in a standardized manner.
Data Analyses
Relative risk for CRF among groups with different anthropometric measures was estimated by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) that were derived from unconditional logistic regression models. We analyzed data stratified by gender throughout, except in analyses of disease-specific CRF, as a result of small sample sizes. Continuous variables (BMI [body weight divided by height raised to the second power, kg/m2], cumulative number of cigarette pack-years, grams of alcohol per week) were categorized into quartiles according to the distribution among control subjects. In addition, BMI was categorized according to World Health Organizations (WHOs) definitions of overweight and obesity (14). Because few participants had a BMI >30 kg/m2 at age 20, BMI at that age was dichotomized into <25 and
25 kg/m2. Level of education was categorized into
9 yr, 10 to 12 yr, and
13 yr. An indicator of regular use of aspirin and paracetamol was found to control sufficiently for confounding of nonnarcotic analgesic use. Adjustment for socioeconomic status instead of number of school years did not change the risk estimates. Always included as covariates in our models were age, cumulative cigarette pack-years, grams of alcohol consumed per week, ever/never regular use of paracetamol or aspirin, and number of years of formal education. We tested for interactions but did not include any interaction terms in the final models because they were statistically insignificant. Model fit was verified with the Hosmer and Lemeshow test (15).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
35 kg/m2 in both genders. Men and women who reported a BMI
25 kg/m2 at age 20 had a significant three-fold elevated risk for CRF compared with patients with BMI <25 kg/m2. BMI at age 40 and at age 60 showed similar relationships with CRF risk as did highest lifetime BMI, but the relative risk estimates were less precise as a result of the smaller number of patients who had attained these ages (data not shown). However, BMI at time of interview was not significantly associated with CRF risk: Men and women with BMI of 35 kg/m2 or more had adjusted OR of 1.9 (95% CI 0.8 to 4.6) and 1.2 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.3), respectively, relative to patients with BMI <25.
|
35 kg/m2 was 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 8.1), relative to patients with BMI <25 kg/m2. Analyses that were confined to individuals who reported neither diabetes nor hypertension produced point estimates of similar magnitude, albeit without statistical significance (Table 4). In contrast, a statistically significant three-fold risk increase was observed among those who did not have diabetes and hypertension and who reported overweight at age 20 (Table 4).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is an accumulating body of clinical and experimental data implicating obesity as an important causative factor in renal disease (17,18), but epidemiologic data linking obesity to CRF have been scarce so far. Some studies have investigated the association between obesity and proteinuria in the general population (8,9); however, few epidemiologic studies have quantified the possible link between obesity and established renal failure in population-based settings. Our study is one of the first large-scale, population-based investigations to identify obesity as an important risk factor in the development of renal failure. Relative risk estimates that were consistent with ours were reported in a cohort study with a smaller number of incident CRF cases (19). In a Japanese cohort that was assembled during a mass screening project in 1983, high BMI was associated with an increased risk for ESRD 17 yr later but only among men (12). There, the excess risk was comparable or slightly higher than in our study. A similar US cohort study among individuals who participated in a health testing program reported an even stronger and monotonic trend of increasing ESRD risk with increasing BMI among both men and women (11). Another US cohort study among men and women who were free of kidney disease at baseline noted a 23% increase per unit BMI in the odds of falling below the fifth percentile of GFR after 18.5 yr of follow-up (10).
It is widely known that obesity markedly increases risk for diabetes and hypertension (20) and that both diabetes and hypertension are important contributors to ESRD (21,22). Not surprising, in analyses that estimated risks for specific renal diseases, we found the strongest positive association of high BMI with risk for diabetic nephropathy (related to type 2 diabetes) and the second strongest relationship with nephrosclerosis (almost all patients were reported to have hypertension as the underlying cause of this diagnosis). Nevertheless, two- to three-fold risk elevations also were observed for glomerulonephritis and "other renal diseases," although we cannot exclude some degree of misclassification because the renal diagnoses were based on biopsies in only 30%. As hypertension accompanies virtually all types of renal disease not only as a cause but also frequently as a consequence of the renal failure and because both hypertension and mild to moderate renal failure can pass unnoticed for several years, it is a limitation of our study that we were unable to establish whether any hypertension preceded the onset of the kidney disease. Specifically, we cannot exclude that some patients with glomerulonephritis and "other renal diseases" also had previous hypertension, potentially related to obesity. We chose not to adjust for hypertension in our modeling because hypertension frequently is a secondary effect of CRF, but in an attempt to elucidate further the effect of BMI on CRF risk, independent of hypertension and diabetes, we conducted analyses that were stratified on these conditions. We observed stronger associations among individuals with hypertension and/or diabetes, but excesses in risks also were seen among overweight individuals with a negative self-reported history of these conditions, at least among individuals who reported overweight at age 20. However, these analyses were based on small numbers, and the results must be interpreted cautiously. In addition, some of the patients may have had undiagnosed hypertension or diabetes.
We did not take preexisting proteinuria into consideration in this study, because confounding by proteinuria seems unlikely. It seems well established that leakage of proteins through the glomeruli, regardless of the cause, is harmful to the kidney (23,24). As obesity is the cause of glomerular leakage of proteins, proteinuria must be a link in one of the causal chains between obesity and CRF. Hence, proteinuria could be a true confounding factor only if it would be associated with obesity without being a consequence of it. It is conceivable that massive proteinuria of other causes than obesity could be associated with fluid retention, but it is inconceivable that such retention could result in BMI values of 30 or more. If proteinuria of other causes than obesity would result in reduced physical activity without a corresponding reduction in energy intake, then some weight gain also would be expected, but BMI values in excess of 30 seem implausible. Therefore, in our opinion, proteinuria is in the causal pathway between obesity and CRF and does not act as a confounder.
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and/or glomerulomegaly is seen commonly in renal biopsies from morbidly obese patients (2527), and the development of these conditions seems to be independent of hypertension and diabetes. The proportion of all renal biopsies that exhibited obesity-related FSGS or glomerulomegaly increased 10-fold from 1986 to 2000 in a New York clinicopathologic study (27). Although a low rate of renal biopsy may have entailed underascertainment, only 16 of our case patients had received a diagnosis of FSGS, and only one had a lifetime highest BMI that exceeded 35 kg/m2.
Our finding that obesity was independently associated with increased risks for all major types of CRF agrees with the "multi-hit" hypothesis (28); that is, obesity entails an extra burden on the nephrons, which promotes the progression of renal failure. Obesity previously has been linked to the progression of existing renal disease, independent of other risk factors, but it also is an independent risk factor for proteinuria in the general population (8,9). In the latter case, obesity would act as an initiator of the process, although a preceding state of reduced number of nephrons as a result of congenital or unknown environmental and lifestyle factors cannot be excluded. Obese individuals, compared with lean, are at higher risk for developing proteinuria and CRF after unilateral nephrectomy (29). This supports the view that the coexistence of obesity and reduced number of functioning nephrons increases risk for CRF.
The BMICRF risk relationship seemed to be somewhat strongerand evident in a lower BMI rangein men than in women. However, no BMI*gender interactions attained statistical significance. Therefore, the observed difference is likely to be a chance finding. However, the previous literature has provided some weak indications that a true gender difference might exist (11,12). The definition of ESRD in these studies was based mainly on the occurrence of renal replacement therapy (or death as a result of ESRD), so gender differences with regard to medical management could have introduced bias. In our study, the outcome classification was based on serum creatinine measurements in combination with evaluations by local specialists. Although different cut points were used for men and women, the inherent association among body weight, muscle mass, and serum creatinine warrants cautious interpretation of gender differences. In general, however, it seems that men have a more rapid progression rate of renal failure than women (30), possibly mediated by sex hormones, but one could speculate that differences in risk that is conferred by being overweight also may be important to this gender difference in progression rate.
The mechanisms that lead to renal damage in obesity are not completely understood. Suggested contributing factors include hyperlipidemia, hyperleptinemia, a state of low-grade inflammation, hyperfiltration caused by insulin resistance, increased sympathetic activity, and activated renin-angiotensin system (17,31).
The major strengths of our study include its population-based design deriving from a well-defined and continuously enumerated source population, the complete ascertainment of all incident CRF cases, and the relatively large sample size. Moreover, the vast majority of case patients had moderately severe renal failure, thus allaying some concern about recall bias, reverse causation, and/or selective loss of cases with rapid disease progression. Important selection bias is unlikely owing to the fairly high and equal participation rates among case patients and control subjects. However, obese individuals, who experience considerable morbidity of various kinds, may undergo serum creatinine testing more often than the average person, raising some concern about possible detection bias. The creatinine levels that were chosen for our case definition are typically symptomatic. Therefore, the pool of asymptomatic prevalent cases that potentially could be recruited through more zealous creatinine testing is likely to be small.
Misclassification of the self-reported anthropometric measures could have influenced our results. Although self-reported information on height, current weight, weight at age 20, and birth weight is known to be relatively accurate overall (3234), there is a systematic tendency for overweight individuals to underestimate their body size; conversely, very lean individuals tend to overestimate (35). Such misclassification of exposure, if nondifferential between case patients and control subjects, would bias estimates of associations toward null. The absence of any widespread preconceptions among the public about links between anthropometric measures and CRF lessens concern about reporting bias.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank all participating men and women whose efforts enabled this study. We are indebted to the physicians who cared for patients with renal diseases in Sweden for their participation, to the staff of the laboratories that were involved in this study, and to Annika Åkerström for coordinating the study.
| Footnotes |
|---|
See related editorial, "The Enlarging Body of Evidence: Obesity and Chronic Kidney Disease," on pages 1501-1502.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Zoccali, A. Kramer, and K. J. Jager Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease--a review produced to contribute to the report 'the status of health in the European union: towards a healthier Europe' NDT Plus, October 12, 2009; (2009) sfp127v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Krikken, S. J. L. Bakker, and G. J. Navis Role of renal haemodynamics in the renal risks of overweight Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1708 - 1711. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-A. Moutzouris, L. Herlitz, G. B. Appel, G. S. Markowitz, B. Freudenthal, J. Radhakrishnan, and V. D. D'Agati Renal Biopsy in the Very Elderly Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2009; 4(6): 1073 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Canales, L.-Y. Lui, B. C. Taylor, A. Ishani, R. Mehra, K. L. Stone, S. Redline, K. E. Ensrud, and for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Renal function and sleep-disordered breathing in older men Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3908 - 3914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ryu, Y. Chang, H.-Y. Woo, S.-G. Kim, D.-I. Kim, W. S. Kim, B.-S. Suh, N.-K. Choi, and J.-T. Lee Changes in Body Weight Predict CKD in Healthy Men J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 19(9): 1798 - 1805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Ikizler, P. Stenvinkel, and B. Lindholm Resolved: Being Fat Is Good for Dialysis Patients: The Godzilla Effect: Pro J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1059 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Griffin, H. Kramer, and A. K. Bidani Adverse renal consequences of obesity Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F685 - F696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Ramos, A. Shintani, T. A. Ikizler, and J. Himmelfarb Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Are Associated with Adiposity in Moderate to Severe CKD J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 593 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferris, S. L. Hogan, H. Chin, D. A. Shoham, D. S. Gipson, K. Gibson, S. Yilmaz, R. J. Falk, and J. C. Jennette Obesity, Albuminuria, and Urinalysis Findings in US Young Adults from the Add Health Wave III Study Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1207 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rigalleau, C. Lasseur, C. Raffaitin, M.-C. Beauvieux, N. Barthe, P. Chauveau, C. Combe, and H. Gin Normoalbuminuric Renal-Insufficient Diabetic Patients: A lower-risk group Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 2034 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Ar. Mani, J. Radhakrishnan, H. Wang, Al. Mani, M.A. Mani, C. Nelson-Williams, K.S. Carew, S. Mane, H. Najmabadi, D. Wu, et al. Metabolic Syndrome--What We Know and What We Don't Know: LPR6 Mutation in a Family with Early Coronary Disease and Metabolic Risk Factors. Science 315: 1278-1282, 2007 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1619 - 1623. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|
D. W. Johnson WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL FAT MASS IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS? Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S250 - S254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Wahba and R. H. Mak Obesity and Obesity-Initiated Metabolic Syndrome: Mechanistic Links to Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 550 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Obesity Increases Risk for Chronic Kidney Failure Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, August 9, 2006; 2006(809): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Chertow, C.-y. Hsu, and K. L. Johansen The Enlarging Body of Evidence: Obesity and Chronic Kidney Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1501 - 1502. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |