| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Epidemiology and Outcomes |





* Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio;
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
Division of Nephrology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Address correspondence to: Dr. Vandana Menon, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, 750 Washington Street, NEMC #391, Boston, MA 02111. Phone: 617-636-8791; Fax: 617-636-8329; E-mail: vmenon{at}tufts-nemc.org
Received for publication April 10, 2006. Accepted for publication June 29, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kidney function is an important determinant of circulating levels of adiponectin (13,14), and levels of this protein are markedly elevated in kidney failure (15). Data on the relationship between adiponectin and outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are sparse. Low adiponectin levels were associated with increased risk for CVD events in one study of hemodialysis patients (15). Similarly, there was an inverse correlation between adiponectin levels and incident CVD in univariate analyses in a small cohort of patients in the earlier stages of CKD (13). Using data from the randomized cohort of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, we therefore examined the association between adiponectin levels and all-cause and CVD mortality in a cohort of patients with CKD stages 3 to 4.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adiponectin was measured in 820 frozen fasting serum samples that were drawn at baseline from the randomized cohort of the MDRD study using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The coefficient of variation for intra- and interassay precision were <5 and <7%, respectively.
Survival status and date and cause of death were ascertained from the National Death Index. A death was ascribed to CVD when the primary cause of death was International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 390 through 459 (n = 98) or when kidney disease or diabetes was listed as the primary cause of death and CVD was the secondary cause of death (n = 24). Survival time was defined as time from randomization to death or end of follow-up (December 31, 2000). Data collection procedures were approved by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Tufts-New England Medical Center Institutional Review Boards.
Statistical Analyses
Summary statistics according to tertiles of adiponectin are presented as percentages for categorical data, mean (±SD) for approximately normally distributed continuous variables and as median (interquartile range) for skewed continuous variables. Differences in baseline characteristics between the groups were tested using the
2 test, one-way ANOVA, and the Kruskall-Wallis test as appropriate. Independent determinants of adiponectin were identified in a multivariable linear regression model. Differences in survival between the tertiles of adiponectin were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and with survival curves adjusted for gender.
Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between adiponectin and all-cause and CVD mortality initially without adjustment and subsequently adjusting for several groups of a priori defined confounding variables. Model 1 adjusted for randomization assignments to protein diets and BP strata, age, gender, and race. Model 2 adjusted for traditional CVD risk factors, including history of CVD and diabetes, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), systolic BP, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and natural log-transformed C-reactive protein (CRP) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in addition to the variables in model 1. Model 3 adjusted for variables in model 2 as well as kidney disease factors GFR and log-transformed proteinuria. Proportional hazards assumptions were tested using log minus log survival plots and plots of Schoenfeld residuals versus survival time. Hazard ratios (HR) are presented per 1-µg/ml increase in adiponectin, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the HR. We calculated R2 for multivariable linear regression models with adiponectin as the dependent variable and covariates from models 1, 2, and 3 as independent variables to quantify the correlation between adiponectin and covariates. P < 0.05 was considered significant for the primary outcomes of all-cause and CVD mortality.
Additional Analyses
We tested for nonlinearity by examining the functional form of the relationship of all-cause mortality risk and CVD mortality risk versus adiponectin as a continuous variable while controlling for the covariates by fitting a cubic smoothing spline with 5 degrees of freedom. Given the associations of albumin with both adiponectin and mortality (17), the final Cox model (model 3) was repeated with additional adjustment for serum albumin. Model 3 also was repeated replacing HbA1c with insulin or with homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) as an indicator of insulin resistance (18). Because both insulin and HOMA had skewed distributions, they were natural log transformed for these analyses.
Because adiponectin is inversely correlated with GFR, adiponectin may be related to progression of kidney disease, and kidney failure may modify the relationship between adiponectin and mortality outcomes. Therefore, Cox models (corresponding to model 3) were repeated using four additional outcomes: (1) Kidney failure, (2) all-cause or (3) CVD death before reaching kidney failure (need for renal replacement therapy with dialysis or transplantation) with censoring at kidney failure or end of follow-up, and (4) a composite outcome of death or kidney failure. For these four secondary outcomes, we report actual P values and consider P < 0.0127 significant (critical value based on the Bonferroni correction).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Additional Analyses
In nonparametric regression analyses, the log-adjusted risk ratio had a linear relationship with adiponectin for all-cause (P = 0.826 for the nonlinearity test; P < 0.001 linear effect) and CVD mortality (P = 0.839 for the nonlinearity test; P < 0.001 linear effect; Figure 2).
|
A total of 544 patients reached kidney failure during follow-up. There was a significant association between adiponectin (per 1-µg/ml increase) and kidney failure in unadjusted analysis (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; P < 0.001); however, adjustment for GFR attenuated this relationship, and it was no longer significant (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01; P = 0.55).
Sixty-six participants died from any cause and 35 from CVD before reaching kidney failure. In unadjusted analyses, the HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.05; P = 0.25) for all-cause and 1.04 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.08; P = 0.02) for CVD mortality. The HR after adjustment for age, gender, and GFR was 1.03 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.07; P = 0.05) for all-cause and 1.07 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.11; P = 0.001) for CVD mortality. Given the limited number of events, we did not perform further multivariable adjustment.
A total of 610 participants died or reached kidney failure by December 31, 2000. There was no association between adiponectin and the composite outcome of kidney failure or death in Cox model adjusting for age, gender, race, diabetes, randomization assignments, systolic BP, BMI, proteinuria, GFR, and cause of kidney disease (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02; P = 0.55).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Low levels of adiponectin were associated with higher risk for incident coronary heart disease events in men with and without diabetes in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (5,6). Similar results were obtained in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (22). Therefore, data from cross-sectional and prospective studies suggest that high levels of this hormone may mitigate CVD risk. In contrast to these data, other studies have reported no association between adiponectin and CVD or even that higher levels of adiponectin may be associated with CVD. An Italian study of patients with type 2 diabetes failed to demonstrate a difference in adiponectin levels between participants with and without CVD (23). In cross-sectional studies in patients with type 1 diabetes, high rather than low adiponectin was associated with retinopathy and CVD (10,11,24). A case-control study did not find an association between adiponectin and angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease (25). Analysis of data from the Strong Heart Study failed to find an association between adiponectin and incident coronary heart disease (9), whereas in a population-based sample of women, low adiponectin did not predict CVD (8). In a recent prospective study of 195 patients with chronic heart failure, high rather than low adiponectin was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (12). Therefore, despite the existence of strong experimental evidence, prospective epidemiologic studies have not demonstrated conclusively a relationship between adiponectin and reduced risk for CVD.
There is a correlation between kidney function and adiponectin, and levels of this protein are markedly elevated in kidney failure (26), inversely related to GFR and directly related to proteinuria (10,13,14,26,27). Adiponectin levels decreased after successful kidney transplantation, suggesting a role for the kidney in biodegradation and/or elimination of this protein (28).
Limited data on the relationship between adiponectin and CVD exist in patients with CKD. There was no difference in adiponectin levels between patients with and without history of CVD in a cross-sectional study of hemodialysis patients (29). High adiponectin was associated with a favorable CVD risk profile in patients with kidney failure as well as those in the earlier stages of CKD (13,15,29). Becker et al. (13) found an inverse association between adiponectin and prevalent CVD in cross-sectional analyses and a univariate association between low adiponectin and incident CVD in patients with nondiabetic kidney disease. Similarly, low adiponectin was an independent predictor of a composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal CVD events but not of all-cause mortality in 227 dialysis patients (15). Of note, in the study by Kistorp et al. (12), which demonstrated a direct relationship between adiponectin and mortality, creatinine clearance in the patients with the highest tertile of adiponectin was 58 ± 20 ml/min.
Differences in results between our study and those reported by Becker et al. (13) may be attributable to differences in the study population, differences in severity of kidney disease, and the variables that were adjusted for in multivariate analyses. In the study by Becker et al. (13), the patient population had better preserved kidney function with mean estimated GFR of 63 ml/min per 1.73 m2, compared with 32 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the MDRD study cohort. Similarly, mean adiponectin was lower (6.1 µg/ml) compared with the MDRD study cohort (12.8 µg/ml), perhaps reflecting less advanced kidney disease. Becker et al. (13) demonstrated a significant univariate association between low adiponectin and incident CVD but were unable to perform multivariable analyses because of small numbers of events and limited statistical power.
There are several potential explanations for why adiponectin may be a maker of increased CVD risk in patients with CKD; however, it must be acknowledged that our study, although hypothesis generating, does not directly address any of them. First, the accumulation of adiponectin in CKD may reflect or mediate the wasting and malnutrition that characterize this disease state (30). Contrary to the general population, high BMI and increased adiposity seem to confer a survival advantage in dialysis patients (30,31) and in heart failure (32). There are some experimental data to suggest that adiponectin may be associated with weight loss secondary to increased energy expenditure (33,34). We and others have demonstrated an inverse relationship of adiponectin with BMI (35) and serum albumin (26). Therefore, it is possible that the high adiponectin levels in patients with CKD, similar to patients with heart failure (12), may reflect poor nutritional status and/or vulnerability to the wasting processes and therefore is a marker of poor prognosis. In our study, the relationship between adiponectin and mortality was independent of BMI and remained significant, especially for CVD mortality with adjustment for serum albumin. However, given the strong relationship between nutritional indices and outcomes in kidney disease, the observed associations may be the result of inadequate adjustment for the effect of malnutrition on outcomes. These data suggest that in the CKD population, unlike the general population and similar to patients with heart failure, high adiponectin may reflect other pathologic processes, including malnutrition.
Second, several studies have suggested an independent relationship between reduced kidney function and mortality (36,37). Therefore, given the close association between adiponectin and kidney function, the observed relationship between adiponectin and mortality may reflect either residual confounding as a result of decreased kidney function or confounding by parallel processes that accompany kidney disease and are not captured by adjustment for kidney function. We used iothalamate GFR and proteinuria as precise measures of kidney function. In addition, we did not find a relationship between adiponectin and kidney failure or with a composite outcome of death and kidney failure. Furthermore, the association between adiponectin and CVD mortality was present in patients who died before reaching kidney failure.
Third, although little is known regarding the kidney handling of adiponectin, one could speculate that in kidney disease, derangements in the metabolism of adiponectin could result in (1) an alteration of the ratio between different forms of this peptide, (2) disordered posttranslational modification leading to altered or decreased biologic activity, and/or (3) accumulation of an abnormal metabolite. Any or all of these processes could have deleterious consequences that counteract its beneficial insulin-sensitizing, anti-inflammatory, and antiatherogenic effects. There are some experimental data in support of this hypothesis. Circulating adiponectin exists in two discrete complexes (38); the ratio between these two forms seems to determine improvements in insulin sensitivity in response to thiazolidinedione treatment (39). Eight isomers that are formed as a result of posttranslational modifications have been identified, and these forms seem to differ in the signal transduction pathways that they activate and their degree of biologic activity and effects on target tissues (40).
Finally, the observed results may be unique to the this study population. The MDRD study represents a predominantly nondiabetic, relatively healthy CKD population. This cohort is different from the preponderance of patients with CKD in that a majority of the participants progress to kidney failure. However, the low prevalence of preexisting CVD, diabetes, and malnutrition reduces confounding by these powerful risk factors.
The strengths of this prospective study include the large number of patients, long-term follow-up, low prevalence of CVD at baseline, detailed ascertainment of potentially confounding variables, and precise measurement of GFR. The main limitations are lack of follow-up adiponectin measurements and the use of a single baseline measurement to predict events several years in the future. However, serum concentrations of adiponectin seem stable during a period of 1 yr, with minimal short-term variation and high degree of reproducibility (41). Another concern is the potential misclassification of causes of death; however, this should not influence the relationship between adiponectin and all-cause mortality. Finally, we acknowledge that there was no association between adiponectin and all-cause mortality in unadjusted analyses. However, we believe, as explained in our Results section, that this may be accounted for by the lower number of women in the higher adiponectin groups.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Komura, S. Kihara, M. Sonoda, N. Maeda, Y. Tochino, T. Funahashi, and I. Shimomura Increment and impairment of adiponectin in renal failure Cardiovasc Res, January 20, 2010; (2010): cvp415v2 - cvp415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bacchetta, S. Boutroy, F. Guebre-Egziabher, L. Juillard, J. Drai, S. Pelletier, M. Richard, A. Charrie, M. C. Carlier, R. Chapurlat, et al. The relationship between adipokines, osteocalcin and bone quality in chronic kidney disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3120 - 3125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Guo, Y. Pan, and H. M. Jin Adiponectin is positively associated with insulin resistance in subjects with type 2 diabetic nephropathy and effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker losartan Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1876 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zoccali and F. Mallamaci Obesity, diabetes, adiponectin and the kidney: a podocyte affair Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3767 - 3770. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Axelsson The emerging biology of adipose tissue in chronic kidney disease: from fat to facts Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3041 - 3046. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sattar and S. M. Nelson Adiponectin, Diabetes, and Coronary Heart Disease in Older Persons: Unraveling the Paradox J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3299 - 3301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Kizer, J. I. Barzilay, L. H. Kuller, and J. S. Gottdiener Adiponectin and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Older Men and Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3357 - 3364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Maiolino, M. Cesari, D. Sticchi, M. Zanchetta, L. Pedon, K. Antezza, A. C. Pessina, and G. P. Rossi Plasma Adiponectin for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in High-Risk Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3333 - 3340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rao, L. Li, H. Tighiouart, B. L. Jaber, B. J. G. Pereira, V. S. Balakrishnan, and the HEMO Study Group Plasma adiponectin levels and clinical outcomes among haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 2619 - 2628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saraheimo, C. Forsblom, L. Thorn, J. Waden, M. Rosengard-Barlund, O. Heikkila, K. Hietala, D. Gordin, J. Frystyk, A. Flyvbjerg, et al. Serum Adiponectin and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1165 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Ikizler, P. Stenvinkel, and B. Lindholm Resolved: Being Fat Is Good for Dialysis Patients: The Godzilla Effect: Pro J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1059 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Marso, S. K. Mehta, A. Frutkin, J. A. House, J. R. McCrary, and K. R. Kulkarni Low Adiponectin Levels Are Associated With Atherogenic Dyslipidemia and Lipid-Rich Plaque in Nondiabetic Coronary Arteries Diabetes Care, May 1, 2008; 31(5): 989 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Dekker, T. Funahashi, G. Nijpels, S. Pilz, C. D. A. Stehouwer, M. B. Snijder, L. M. Bouter, Y. Matsuzawa, I. Shimomura, and R. J. Heine Prognostic Value of Adiponectin for Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1489 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schnabel, C. M. Messow, E. Lubos, C. Espinola-Klein, H. J. Rupprecht, C. Bickel, C. Sinning, S. Tzikas, T. Keller, S. Genth-Zotz, et al. Association of adiponectin with adverse outcome in coronary artery disease patients: results from the AtheroGene study Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2008; 29(5): 649 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stenvinkel, J. J. Carrero, J. Axelsson, B. Lindholm, O. Heimburger, and Z. Massy Emerging Biomarkers for Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk in the Chronic Kidney Disease Patient: How Do New Pieces Fit into the Uremic Puzzle? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 505 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Carrero, O. Heimburger, P. Stenvinkel, and B. Lindholm Reply to A Molfino et al Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1551 - 1553. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Wannamethee, P. H. Whincup, L. Lennon, and N. Sattar Circulating Adiponectin Levels and Mortality in Elderly Men With and Without Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure Arch Intern Med, July 23, 2007; 167(14): 1510 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barazzoni, A. Bernardi, F. Biasia, A. Semolic, A. Bosutti, M. Mucci, F. Dore, M. Zanetti, and G. Guarnieri Low fat adiponectin expression is associated with oxidative stress in nondiabetic humans with chronic kidney disease--impact on plasma adiponectin concentration Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R47 - R54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Wahba and R. H. Mak Obesity and Obesity-Initiated Metabolic Syndrome: Mechanistic Links to Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 550 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |