| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Article |
United States Renal Data System Coordinating Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Correspondence: Dr. Robert N. Foley, United States Renal Data System, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S-253, Minneapolis, MN 55404. Phone: 612-347-5811; Fax: 612-347-5878; E-mail: rfoley{at}usrds.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this article is to review the state of ESRD in the United States; in particular, the treatment of adult dialysis patients is the principal focus. Unless otherwise stated, the primary data underlying the statements in this article are available in the 2006 United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Annual Data Report at http://www.usrds.org. The full content of the annual data report from the USRDS now contains a total of 421 pages; as a result, this review article must necessarily be both selective and subjective.1
| DISEASE BURDEN AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH ESRD |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although these patterns are encouraging, especially in an era in which one of the major risk factors for renal disease, type 2 diabetes, has reached epidemic proportions,3 several new years of data will be required to determine whether real population changes have occurred. Nevertheless, this is an encouraging pattern, and it is tempting to speculate that improvements in preventive care, such as use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, and enhancements in glycemic and BP control may have contributed. This being said, that the population of the United States continues to grow tends to suggest that the size of the RRT population will also continue to grow unless incidence or survival rates fall. With regard to specific subgroups, this pattern of stabilized or declining adjusted incidence rates was apparent in all age groups; both genders; and white, Hispanic, black, and Asian subgroups; incidence rates remained unchanged from 2003 to 2004 in Native Americans after 4 successive years of declining adjusted incidence rates. The decline in incidence rates in the black population is particularly noteworthy, because event rates in this demographic category are typically three times those of the national average. Although a major public health challenge still remains, these findings are cause for optimism because 2004 was the second calendar year in which a decline in incidence rate was observed in black individuals, the other being 1999.
Diabetes remained the dominant primary cause of incident ESRD, with reported rates of 148.8 cases per million in 2004. Figure 1 shows adjusted rates of end-stage diabetic renal disease by race and ethnicity in selected age bands of the general population, namely 30 to 39 and 60 to 69 yr. In both age bands, it is apparent that disease rates vary substantially according to race and ethnicity. Among younger adults, rates have declined in white individuals since the early 1990s and remained constant in those designated as Asian and Hispanic, whereas rates have continued to rise among black individuals and Native Americans. Among older adults, rates seem to have stabilized in the past 5 yr in all racial and ethnic groups, although disparities remain marked. Although the underlying basis for these findings remains unknown, increasing rates of diabetic ESRD in younger black adults is a cause for concern and suggests a looming public health crisis. For hypertension, the second most common cause of ESRD, incidence rates remain considerably higher in black individuals in all age groups. However, annual trends suggest a flattening of the growth curve in all age groups and in all races.
|
Clinical impression and the increasing age and cardiovascular disease burden of new dialysis patients suggest that atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) may be an emerging condition of importance in this population. Surprising, little observational research is available to test this hypothesis, and temporal trends regarding the epidemiology of atherosclerotic renovascular disease in the dialysis population have not been well characterized. We recently used the USRDS data set to identify ARVD and revascularization procedures in patients aged
67 yr at dialysis inception between 1996 and 2001 by using diagnostic Medicare claims.4 The proportion of patients with ARVD before initiation of dialysis therapy rose from 7.1% in 1996 to 11.2% in 2001. Approximately 15% of these patients underwent revascularization. The prevalence of previous ARVD and renal revascularization exhibited considerable geographic variation. Of note, the seemingly rising burden of ARVD in older patients starting dialysis therapy was not reflected in the proportion of patients with renovascular disease listed as cause of ESRD on the Medical Evidence Report at dialysis inception, which remained static at approximately 5.0%.4 These findings suggest that ARVD is becoming more common in older patients beginning dialysis therapy.
The initial laboratory findings in patients starting RRT have also changed considerably from year to year. For example, comparing 1996 and 2005, initial hemoglobin levels rose from 9.3 to 10.2 g/dl, blood urea nitrogen fell from 94.0 to 83.3 mg/dl, serum creatinine fell from 8.5 to 6.8 mg/dl, and estimated GFR rose from 7.7 to 10.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2. If one assumes that these variables reflect treatment of nondialysis CKD, referral practices, and acuity of renal functional decline, then these findings suggest that some progress has been made in the past decade. Not unexpected, given that diabetes is the cause of ESRD in more than half of the incident population and the epidemic levels of obesity in the general population, body mass index at inception of RRT has increased considerably during this timeframe, from 25.5 to 28.2 kg/m2.
| MODALITIES OF RRT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| CLINICAL CARE INDICATORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The year 2006 was notable for the publication of large trials assessing various hemoglobin targets under epoetin therapy in patients with CKD. In aggregate, these trials suggested that higher hemoglobin targets may be dangerous.5–7 Thus, concern is emerging that overshooting recommended hemoglobin targets may be dangerous in dialysis patients, as may highly variable hemoglobin levels. Achieving hemoglobin levels >11 g/dl is almost routinely feasible in current hemodialysis populations. Among patients who achieved this level with epoetin therapy between July 2004, and July 2005, the 6-mo cumulative probability values of exceeding hemoglobin levels of 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, and 14 g/dl were 0.96, 0.88, 0.76, 0.58, and 0.41, respectively. It has also become clear that hemoglobin levels in US dialysis patients vary considerably over time. For example, among patients receiving epoetin on January 1, 2004, 23.0% had hemoglobin levels <11 g/dl, 47.4% between 11 and 12.5 g/dl, and 29.5% >12.5 g/dl. Among patients with levels <11 g/dl, hemoglobin categories 3 mo earlier were 36.5% <11 g/dl, 43.6% between 11 and 12.5 g/dl. and 20.0% >12.5 g/dl; for the other two categories of hemoglobin levels, the corresponding figures were 20.1, 53.5, and 26.4% and 18.7, 40.6, and 40.7%, respectively. Although the contributions of intrapatient and extrapatient factors are unknown, the findings of excessive overshooting and hemoglobin variability may be a cause for concern.
| OUTCOMES: MORTALITY HOSPITALIZATION AND COST |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Medicare and non-Medicare costs for ESRD have climbed to $20.1 billion and $12.4 billion, respectively. The most recent estimate suggests annual Medicare costs of $68,000, $49,000, and $24,000 for hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplant patients, respectively. The cost of ESRD in the United States continues to accelerate greatly, with a growth in Medicare costs of 57% between 1999 and 2004, to the extent that the ESRD program now accounts for 6.7% of total Medicare expenditures.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Thadhani Is Calcitriol Life-Protective for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 2285 - 2290. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kramer, V. Stel, C. Zoccali, J. Heaf, D. Ansell, C. Gronhagen-Riska, T. Leivestad, K. Simpson, R. Palsson, M. Postorino, et al. An update on renal replacement therapy in Europe: ERA-EDTA Registry data from 1997 to 2006 Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 9, 2009; (2009) gfp519v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bayat, M. Kessler, S. Briancon, and L. Frimat Survival of transplanted and dialysed patients in a French region with focus on outcomes in the elderly Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 11, 2009; (2009) gfp469v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|
A. Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, T. Stompor, M. Kalembkiewicz, M. Krzanowski, R. Mikolajczak, A. Sowa-Staszczak, B. Tabor-Ciepiela, U. Karczmarczyk, B. Kusnierz-Cabala, and W. Sulowicz IDENTIFICATION OF INFLAMED ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE USING 123I-LABELED INTERLEUKIN-2 SCINTIGRAPHY IN HIGH-RISK PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A PILOT STUDY Perit. Dial. Int., September 1, 2009; 29(5): 568 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Morrone, S. Mazzaferro, D. Russo, F. Aucella, M. Cozzolino, M. G. Facchini, A. Galfre, F. Malberti, M. C. Mereu, M. Nordio, et al. Interaction between parathyroid hormone and the Charlson comorbidity index on survival of incident haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2859 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Manhiani, J. E. Quigley, S. F. Knight, S. Tasoobshirazi, T. Moore, M. W. Brands, B. D. Hammock, and J. D. Imig Soluble epoxide hydrolase gene deletion attenuates renal injury and inflammation with DOCA-salt hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F740 - F748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. V. Liang, E. L. Greene, A. W. Williams, C. A. Herzog, D. O. Hodge, T. E. Owan, and M. M. Redfield Exploratory study of relationship between hospitalized heart failure patients and chronic renal replacement therapy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2518 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-J. Hsieh, J.-M. Chang, H.-Y. Chuang, C.-H. Ko, M.-L. Hsieh, G.-C. Liu, and J.-S. Hsu End-Stage Renal Disease: In Vivo Diffusion-Tensor Imaging of Silent White Matter Damage Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 518 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mauer, B. Zinman, R. Gardiner, S. Suissa, A. Sinaiko, T. Strand, K. Drummond, S. Donnelly, P. Goodyer, M. C. Gubler, et al. Renal and Retinal Effects of Enalapril and Losartan in Type 1 Diabetes N. Engl. J. Med., July 2, 2009; 361(1): 40 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ku, J. Park, J. Vidhun, and V. Campese The Hazards of Dual Renin-Angiotensin Blockade in Chronic Kidney Disease Arch Intern Med, June 8, 2009; 169(11): 1015 - 1018. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Mendelssohn, S. K. Mujais, S. D. Soroka, J. Brouillette, T. Takano, P. E. Barre, B. V. Mittal, A. Singh, C. Firanek, K. Story, et al. A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 555 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Perez-Garcia, A. Martin-Malo, J. Fort, X. Cuevas, F. Llados, J. Lozano, F. Garcia, and on behalf of all Investigators from the ANSWER stu Baseline characteristics of an incident haemodialysis population in Spain: results from ANSWER--a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 578 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Eknoyan MD Progress and promise in the management of chronic kidney disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 18, 2008; 179(11): 1107 - 1108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maeda Review: Genetics of diabetic nephropathy Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Dalrymple and A. S. Go Epidemiology of Acute Infections among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1487 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Neilson Baumol's Curse on Medicine J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1049 - 1053. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F M Strippoli, S. D Navaneethan, D. W Johnson, V. Perkovic, F. Pellegrini, A. Nicolucci, and J. C Craig Effects of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials BMJ, March 22, 2008; 336(7645): 645 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |