| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Nephrology |








,**
* Renal Medicine; || Hematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, QEMC;
The Binding Site Ltd., Birmingham;
Divisions of Medical Sciences; ** Immunity and Infection, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham;
School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; and ¶ Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH & Co. KG, Hechingen, Germany
Address correspondence to: Dr. Colin A. Hutchison, Renal Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, QEMC, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK. Phone: +44-121-472-1311; Fax: +44-121-430-6482; me{at}colinhutchison.com
Received for publication August 3, 2006. Accepted for publication November 30, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies have analyzed renal recovery rates after FLC removal by plasma exchange in multiple myeloma. This is a logical approach, but results have been disappointing. Although an early report was optimistic (11), the largest and most recent controlled trial (97 patients) showed no clinical benefit (12). A subsequent editorial in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology listed the shortcomings of this study, including the failure to monitor either serum or urine FLC concentrations (13). It was noted, "This resembles antihypertensive treatment without measuring BP." Clearly, the efficiency of plasma exchange for serum FLC removal could not be judged.
Winearls (14), in 1995, considered that plasma exchange was unlikely to remove sufficient FLC for clinical benefit. Because FLC are relatively small protein molecules (
25 kD and
50 kD), they are present in similar concentrations in serum, the extravascular compartment, and tissue edema fluid (15). Thus, the intravascular compartment may contain only 15 to 20% of the total amount. A series of 3.5-L plasma exchanges that removed only 65% of intravascular FLC on each occasion might have little overall impact, particularly if production were not reduced at the same time by chemotherapy.
An alternative approach is to remove FLC by hemodialysis (16). Although this is not possible with routine dialyzers (because of their small pores), a new generation of protein-leaking dialyzers, with very large pores, could be useful (17). By using extended dialysis, large amounts of FLC might be removed without the attendant clotting and deproteination problems that limit the extended use of plasma exchange. The aims of this study were to (1) make in vitro and in vivo assessments of several protein-leaking hemodialyzers, (2) develop a theoretical model for FLC removal, and (3) identify a clinical strategy for reduction of FLC in patients with multiple myeloma, with a view towards facilitating renal recovery.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design and Participants
The study comprised (1) an initial in vitro and in vivo assessment of dialyzers for clearance of FLC, (2) development of a compartmental model for FLC removal on the basis of observed dialysis results, and (3) use of the model and the most efficient dialyzer to determine the optimal strategy for removal of FLC from patients with renal failure complicating multiple myeloma. The patients investigated were attending or referred to the nephrology department at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
In Vitro Assessment of FLC Removal by Isolated Ultrafiltration
Seven dialyzers were assessed for filtration efficiency (Table 1). Human serum, obtained from the Blood Transfusion Service, was spiked with 1000 mg of both monoclonal
and
FLC. Each dialyzer was placed in a simple circuit and primed with 1 L of normal saline. One liter of serum then was recirculated through the dialyzers at 400 ml/min, with transmembrane pressures of between 300 and 400 mmHg. The procedure was stopped when production of ultrafiltrate (UF) fluid ceased. The dialyzers finally were flushed with 1 L of fresh saline to remove fluid that contained any residual protein. The quantities of FLC in the filtered serum, UF, and flushed fluid were calculated from the FLC concentrations and measured volumes. Serum FLC reductions were calculated by subtraction of the final FLC concentrations from the initial values. The percentage of the original 1000 mg of each FLC, present in the UF at the end of the experiment, was calculated to determine the ability of the membrane to filter FLC. These assessments were repeated three times for each dialyzer, and the mean values were determined.
|
and
FLC then was dialyzed for 4 h. Serum flow rates were set at 300 ml/min, dialysate flow rates were set at 500 ml/min, and transmembrane pressures were set at 0 to 10 mmHg. Ultrafiltration rates of 0.05 and 0.25 L/h were used arbitrarily for the Gambro HCO 1100 and the Toray BK-F, respectively. Serum volumes were maintained at 1 L by an infusion of normal saline. After 2 h, the serum was spiked with 24 ml of saline that contained an additional 1000 mg of both
and
FLC to assess dialyzer blockage. Serum and dialysate fluids were sampled at short intervals for the FLC measurements (12 to 17 samples for each experimental part). Clearance values for
and
were calculated as follows (18):
![]() | (1) |
In Vivo Assessment of FLC Removal in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
During the study period, 13 patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure (estimated GFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and multiple myeloma presented to the Nephrology Department. The first three patients underwent dialysis on one or more of the following dialyzers to determine their individual efficiency for FLC clearance: B. Braun Hi-PeS 18, (B. Braun Medical Ltd, Sheffield, UK) Toray BK-F 2.1, and Gambro HCO 1100. Subsequent patients underwent dialysis only on the Gambro HCO 1100 because of its superior FLC clearance rates (Tables 2 and 3). Patients 4 and 5 had routine dialysis for 4 h thrice weekly. Extended hemodialysis with the Gambro HCO dialyzer was evaluated in patients 6 through 8. Daily extended hemodialysis on the Gambro HCO dialyzer was evaluated for FLC removal in patients 9 through 13, who presented with cast nephropathy.
|
|
Evaluation of FLC Removal by Extended Hemodialysis on the Gambro HCO 1100
An extended dialysis regimen of up to 12 h was evaluated in eight patients (613) with dialysate flow rates of between 300 and 500 ml/min and blood flow rates of 150 to 250 ml/min. Some patients were treated with two or three dialyzers in series (Table 3). The following correlations were assessed: Serum FLC concentrations with quantity of FLC in the dialysate, serum reductions with duration of dialysis, clearance rates with dialysate flow rates, and dialyzer surface area. Cardiovascular stability was monitored throughout each dialysis session. Serum FLC, albumin, and electrolyte concentrations were measured before and after dialysis.
Therapeutic Extended Daily Hemodialysis on the Gambro HCO 1100 for Patients with Cast Nephropathy
During the study period, five patients (9 through 13) presented with new multiple myeloma, acute renal failure, and biopsy-proven cast nephropathy. An extended, daily dialysis regimen was undertaken in an attempt to reduce rapidly serum FLC concentrations. All patients received induction chemotherapy using local hematology protocols (Table 2). FLC clearance rates were evaluated with dialysate flow rates of between 300 and 500 ml/min and blood flow rates of 150 to 250 ml/min. Patients were assessed daily for determination of fluid balance with the aim of maintaining euvolemia. Ultrafiltration was used in addition to hemodialysis when there was fluid overload, and intravenous infusions were used to correct dehydration. Serum Ig were measured for assessment of immune status and normal human Ig were given, at 0.5 g/kg body wt, when serum IgG concentrations were <5 g/L.
Laboratory Measurements of FLC
Serum and dialysate
and
FLC concentrations were measured by nephelometry, on a Dade-Behring BNII Analyser, using a particle-enhanced, high-specificity, homogeneous immunoassay (FREELITE; The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) (19). Normal serum reference ranges used were 7.3 mg/L (range 3.3 to 19.4) for
and 12.7 mg/L (range 5.7 to 26.3) for
with an assay sensitivity of <1 mg/L (20).
Mathematical Model of FLC Removal in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
A two-compartment mathematical model of FLC production, distribution, and removal in multiple myeloma was constructed to compare the efficiencies of plasma exchange and hemodialysis (Figure 1) (21). This was similar in structure to models for dialysis removal of urea and
2-microglobulin (22,23). It consisted of intravascular and extravascular compartments (one and two, respectively) with flow of FLC into, between, and out of each compartment (15). The renal clearance of serum FLC was considered zero (estimated GFR = 0) in patients with renal failure. Under such conditions, removal was by the reticuloendothelial system only, with a half-life of 3 d (24). With the use of this half-life, a production rate of 33.8 g/d produced a steady state of 10 g/L in the intravascular compartment. This was a convenient starting value for the clearance simulations.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Vitro Assessment of FLC Removal by Hemodialysis
The results for FLC removal by in vitro hemodialysis using the Toray BK-F 2.1 and the Gambro HCO 1100 dialyzers are shown in Table 5. Significantly higher FLC dialysate concentrations and greater serum reductions were achieved using the Gambro HCO dialyzer. Clearance rates of both FLC were 60-fold higher using the Gambro dialyzer compared with the Toray dialyzer.
|
Evaluation of FLC Removal by Extended Hemodialysis on the Gambro HCO 1100
Extended hemodialysis (>4 h) on the Gambro HCO 1100 was evaluated for FLC removal in patients 6 through 13 (Table 3). The procedure was well tolerated with no cardiovascular complications. During sessions, there was a mean serum albumin reduction of 3.9 g/L (P < 0.03) that was replaced routinely with 20% albumin solution. Calcium and magnesium were replaced as required. Measurements indicated that there was no IgG leakage into the dialysate fluid.
The amounts of FLC in the dialysate fluids correlated with predialysis serum concentrations (R = 0.74, P < 0.0001). Figure 2 shows serum and dialysate FLC concentrations during a 6-h session for patient 6. When the dialyzer was replaced, there was a transient increase in FLC removal. Figures 3 through 5 show the daily pre- and postdialysis serum FLC concentrations and the amounts of FLC removed in the dialysate fluid (per 10-d periods) for patients 9 through 11, together with details of chemotherapy.
|
|
|
FLC concentrations during a 6-wk period indicated removal of 1.7 kg. Daily measurements of removal by hemodialysis and urine excretion plus estimated internal metabolism indicated a production rate of 150 to 200 g/d.
|
Three of the five patients became dialysis independent. Two patients (10 and 12) developed infections that prevented further use of chemotherapy. Although dialysis removed significant quantities of FLC, concentrations rebounded within 1 to 2 d and patients remained dialysis dependent. By contrast, the three patients who became dialysis independent (9, 11, and 13) responded well to chemotherapy, as evidenced by long-term reductions in serum FLC concentrations (Figures 3 and 5).
Simulation Model for FLC Removal
The results of the simulation studies are shown in Table 4 and Figure 7. With complete tumor killing on day 1 (simulation 1), serum FLC were >500 mg/L for 2 wk (assuming no therapeutic FLC removal). With a chemotherapeutic tumor kill rate of 10% per day and no dialysis, serum FLC concentrations remained >500 mg/L on day 30 (simulation 2). Plasma exchange (simulation 3) was less effective in reducing serum FLC than hemodialysis for 4 h three times per week using the Gambro HCO 1100 dialyzer (simulation 4), and neither method was rapid. Extended daily dialysis (for 12 h) reduced FLC concentrations to 5% of the starting concentrations in 5 d (simulation 6) compared with 29 d for plasma exchange (simulation 3). Analysis of the FLC load on the kidneys over 3 wk (area under the curves) showed that for simulation 3, 76% remained using plasma exchange and 11% remained after 5 d of 12 h/d hemodialysis (simulation 6), a 6.5-fold reduction. When chemotherapeutic killing rates were <10% per day, plasma exchange became progressively less effective than extended hemodialysis (Table 4). Ineffective chemotherapy, even with extended dialysis, did not normalize serum FLC concentrations (simulation 7).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
molecules slowed with time. When dialyzers were replaced, FLC clearance increased slightly (Figure 2).
The amounts of serum FLC that were removed by hemodialysis were influenced by the initial serum FLC concentrations, time periods of dialysis, dialysis flow rates, and dialyzer surface area. The largest amounts removed were from patient 10, who had 42 g/L of serum
FLC at clinical presentation. During a 6-week period, comprising 18 sessions of up to 10 h each, >1.7 kg of FLC was removed. For later dialysis sessions on this patient, two Gambro HCO 1100 dialyzers were connected in series. This added a convective element in addition to increasing the surface area, and the resulting FLC removal more than doubled. This occurred not only in the initial hour as the blood pool was reduced but also during the following hours, when the extravascular reservoir was partially cleared. After 4 to 5 h, serum FLC reductions slowed as the tumor production rate gradually was approached. As an alternative and perhaps more practical option, a single 2-m2 dialyzer could be used.
Although these studies did not assess specifically serum FLC removal by ultrafiltration, it probably would be effective. Figure 6 suggests that maximum clearance rates from the extravascular compartment were being approached with the use of two membranes in series, and there would have been a convective element. Further minor increases in FLC removal rates could be achieved by adjusting the blood or dialysis fluid flow rates. An additional factor that would cause variations in clearance rates between patients would be the degree of FLC polymerization, but this was not assessed (26).
Overall, the extended dialysis was well tolerated with no adverse effects. Previous studies showed the safe use of the Gambro HCO 1100 dialyzer in an intensive care setting (27,28). As predicted, we noted substantial albumin loss that required replacement on a regular basis (20 to 40 g per dialysis session and given as 20% human albumin solution). Such leakage is inevitable with a dialyzer that has a molecular cutoff of similar size to albumin (65 kD). Its use was not associated with hemodynamic or other adverse effects. Prophylactic antibiotics were given before invasive procedures and normal human Ig were used when serum IgG concentrations were <5 g/L. Patients with multiple myeloma usually are immunocompromised, so prevention of infections was important. Overall, our findings indicated that the Gambro HCO 1100 dialyzer was effective and safe when used for removal of huge amounts of monoclonal FLC.
The second aim of the study was to develop a theoretical model of FLC clearance for understanding of various treatment strategies. Using known variables for the model and patient data, we were able, on an iterative basis, to model FLC removal in vivo. This allowed calculation of possible FLC production rates, rates of movement between the extra- and intravascular compartments, and the effectiveness of hemodialysis to be compared with plasma exchange. When the model was interrogated for different treatment strategies, simulations indicated that 4 h of dialysis on alternate days (using the Gambro HCO 1100) compared favorably with recommended plasma exchange protocols (Figure 7 and Table 4) (12). The model indicated that 8 to 12 h of daily dialysis would reduce FLC to low serum concentrations within a few days, provided that chemotherapy was successful. We used a range of tumor killing rates in the model to include several clinical possibilities (Table 4). The 10 and 0% killing rates produced results that were in accordance with observed FLC responses for patient 9 (Figures 3 and 7) and for patient 10, respectively (Figures 4 and 7). There are no published reports of tumor killing rates for comparison, because multiple FLC measurements have not been made at this early stage of treatment. With less efficient tumor killing, the continuing FLC production rendered hemodialysis progressively more effective than plasma exchange (Table 4). More extensive plasma exchange regimens could have been evaluated, but five to seven procedures of 50 ml/kg over 10 to 12 d normally is recommended (12).
|
The third aim of the study was to identify a clinical strategy for reducing serum concentrations of FLC in multiple myeloma. Five consecutive patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure and biopsy-proven cast nephropathy were treated with extended daily hemodialysis, and three became dialysis independent. This compares with published figures of 15 to 20% in patients with biopsy-proven cast nephropathy (14,29). In these three patients, a reduction in serum FLC concentrations of 80 to 95% was associated with recovery of renal function. However, the toxicity of individual monoclonal FLC, the extent of underlying renal damage, and other clinical factors vary enormously, so more or less FLC removal may be appropriate in other patients. It is of note that the plasma exchange procedures that were assessed in the model (Table 4) and used in clinical practice (30) did not reduce serum FLC concentrations by even 30%.
The effectiveness of chemotherapy when treating these patients was of considerable importance. For example, in patient 9 (Figure 3), serum FLC reduced toward normal concentrations within 3 wk. Chemotherapy was effective, large amounts of FLC were removed, and renal function recovered. During the second course of dexamethasone, FLC concentrations reduced between dialysis periods. This probably was due to their metabolism and excretion by the kidneys and indicated recovering function. In patient 10 (Figure 4), chemotherapy was ineffective and then had to be stopped because of infections. Serum FLC concentrations were reduced temporarily by dialysis but rebounded within 1 to 2 d, and there was no renal recovery (Figure 4). It will be important to identify fast-acting and effective drug regimens that can be modified rapidly if FLC concentrations do not fall quickly. Combinations of bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone or of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone are highly successful and have better response rates than vincristine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), and dexamethasone (31).
It is possible that removal of FLC by hemodialysis can protect the kidneys from continuing damage for several weeks. Occasional reports have described late renal function recovery from cast nephropathy. For instance, two patients became dialysis independent after autologous bone marrow transplantation that was many months after their initial clinical presentation with acute renal failure (32). Serum FLC measurements were not reported, but we suggest that the use of high-dosage melphalan had stopped monoclonal FLC production. For renal recovery, however, effective tumor treatment to reduce FLC production is essential, in addition to any removal by hemodialysis. We have not removed FLC from patients who had less severe renal failure and did not require dialysis. Such patients also might benefit from this treatment.
For all patients, daily monitoring with serum FLC tests was helpful. The results made it possible to judge the ongoing effectiveness of the dialyzers and the chemotherapy. Such daily assessments are different from the typical management pace in myeloma. Treatment outcomes normally are assessed over weeks or months, largely from observations of the slow changes that are seen in serum IgG concentrations (half-life of 3 wk). FLC have serum half-lives from 2 to 3 h (2 to 3 d in renal failure), so clinical responses can be seen and acted on much more quickly (33,34).
Our results allow some interpretation of the plasma exchange study by Clark et al. (12), referred to earlier. Although there are no published results of serum FLC concentrations in relation to plasma exchange, a report in press (30) confirms model simulations that only 25 to 30% of the total amount typically is removed during a treatment period (Figure 7 and Table 4). Therefore, switching off FLC production by chemotherapy may have been the main determinant of renal recovery. Fewer than 40% of patients would have had a very good response to vincristine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), and dexamethasone during the first few weeks of treatment (31). Their observed renal recovery rates of approximately 40% (in both plasma exchange and control groups) may reflect only such chemotherapy responses. Other causes of renal failure, such as acute tubular necrosis (as seen in one of our patients), also would be present, but renal biopsies were not performed. Without histologic clarification and frequent measurements of serum FLC, interpretation of trials that assess renal recovery in patients with myeloma kidney will prove difficult (13).
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the patients, the nurses, and the physicians who contributed to this project, in particular Anne-Marie Phythian and Oliver Foster on the renal dialysis unit. We thank The Binding Site Ltd., for financial and technical support and the dialysis companies who supplied the dialyzers at no charge.
Some of these data were presented in abstract form at the annual meetings of the American Society of Hematology (Los Angeles, CA; December 9 to 12, 2006), the British Society of Hematology (Edinburgh, UK; April 3 to 5, 2006), the British Renal Association (Harrogate, UK; May 3 to 5, 2006), and the European Society of Artificial Organs (Umea, Sweden; June 21 to 24, 2006).
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Haynes, S. Read, G. P. Collins, S. C. Darby, and C. G. Winearls Presentation and survival of patients with severe acute kidney injury and multiple myeloma: a 20-year experience from a single centre Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2010; 25(2): 419 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Tsakiris, V. S. Stel, P. Finne, E. Fraser, J. Heaf, J. de Meester, S. Schmaldienst, F. Dekker, E. Verrina, and K. J. Jager Incidence and outcome of patients starting renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease due to multiple myeloma or light-chain deposit disease: an ERA-EDTA Registry study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 27, 2009; (2009) gfp679v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Basnayake, P. Cockwell, C. A. Hutchison, N. Heyne, M. Guthoff, K. C. Weisel, E. Poch, X. Bosch, and J. M. Grau Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Kidney Injury N. Engl. J. Med., October 1, 2009; 361(14): 1411 - 1413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Hutchison, A. R. Bradwell, M. Cook, K. Basnayake, S. Basu, S. Harding, J. Hattersley, N. D. Evans, M. J. Chappel, P. Sampson, et al. Treatment of Acute Renal Failure Secondary to Multiple Myeloma with Chemotherapy and Extended High Cut-Off Hemodialysis Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2009; 4(4): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Hutchison, S. Harding, P. Hewins, G. P. Mead, J. Townsend, A. R. Bradwell, and P. Cockwell Quantitative Assessment of Serum and Urinary Polyclonal Free Light Chains in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1684 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ouseph, C. A. Hutchison, and R. A. Ward Differences in solute removal by two high-flux membranes of nominally similar synthetic polymers Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1704 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Bachmann, R. Schindler, M. Storr, A. Kahl, A. Joerres, and I. Sturm Combination of bortezomib-based chemotherapy and extracorporeal free light chain removal for treating cast nephropathy in multiple myeloma NDT Plus, April 1, 2008; 1(2): 106 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |