| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Nephrology |



,||
* Section on Genetics and Epidemiology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center,
Boston University School of Public Health,
Harvard School of Public Health, || Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Address correspondence to: Dr. Andrzej S. Krolewski, Section on Genetics and Epidemiology, Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215. Phone: 617-732-2668; Fax: 617-732-2667; E-mail: andrzej.krolewski{at}joslin.harvard.edu
Received for publication August 17, 2006. Accepted for publication January 18, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This uncertainty about urinary albumin's role in renal function decline was spotlighted by our demonstration that remission of microalbuminuria is more frequent than its progression to proteinuria (12). The obvious follow-up question is, "Does regression of microalbuminuria imply that renal function is also spared?" (13).
At this early stage of nephropathy, the answer to the question requires a technique for distinguishing systematic decreases in renal function over the long term from short-term variations in normal renal function. To avoid confusion with the progressive loss of function in the late stages of nephropathy, we refer to a systematic decline that occurs while renal function is in the normal range as "early progressive renal function decline."
The introduction of a commercial assay for serum cystatin C to estimate renal function in clinical research opened the way for evaluating early renal function decline in patients with diabetes (14,15). Therefore, we sought to answer the question by measuring the long-term trends in renal function in the 12-yr follow-up data of the same study population that yielded the demonstration of regression of microalbuminuria.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Urine samples from every second patient who had type 1 diabetes and was 15 to 44 yr of age and seen at the Joslin Clinic between January 1991 and April 1992 were examined for albumin excretion (1602 patients). During the first 2 yr of observation, their repeat urine samples were examined to establish their urinary albumin excretion status and eligibility for follow-up. The 347 patients who already had proteinuria or ESRD were not followed, but the rest were followed for 8 to 12 yr with frequent urine examinations (average of three per 2-yr interval). The 312 patients with microalbuminuria already present in the initial 2-yr interval (prevalent microalbuminuria) were invited to give a blood sample and be examined. Thereafter, they were invited biennially for reexamination. Within 4 yr after the initial evaluation, new-onset microalbuminuria developed in 109 of the 943 patients with normoalbuminuria (18). These patients were invited to give a blood sample and be examined, and biennially they were invited for reexamination along with the 312 prevalent cases of microalbuminuria. Together, they composed the cohort of 421 patients with microalbuminuria studied previously to determine the frequency of microalbuminuria regression (12). As a comparison group for the microalbuminuria cohort, we invited a random sample of 414 of the remaining 834 patients with normoalbuminuria for biennial examinations and blood samples.
For the analysis of trends in renal function, we selected all individuals with at least two (on average four) archived serum samples that spanned a minimum of 4 yr. Those who were available for this analysis were 301 (71%) of the 421 patients in the microalbuminuria cohort and 305 (74%) of the 414 patients in the normoalbuminuria group who had been invited for biennial examinations. In the latter group, we excluded from this analysis 38 individuals in whom microalbuminuria developed late in follow-up. Therefore, the reference group includes only the 268 patients with persistent normoalbuminuria throughout 8 to 12 yr of follow-up.
Assessment of Urinary Albumin Excretion and Exposure Variables
The albumin excretion rate (in micrograms per minute) was estimated from the albumin-to-creatinine ratio in random urine samples, as described previously (12,16). Briefly, individual determinations of the albumin excretion rate were transformed to the logarithmic scale (base 10) for analysis. Follow-up observation was organized into 2-yr intervals, and patients were assigned a urinary albumin excretion status for each interval according to the geometric mean of their determinations in that interval: Normoalbuminuria was defined as an excretion rate <30 µg/min, microalbuminuria 30 to 299 µg/min, and proteinuria
300 µg/min. The examination of exposure variables was described previously (16). Briefly, this included a medical history that emphasized use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and other antihypertensive medications, measurement of BP, and phlebotomy for assaying cholesterol profile and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
GFR Estimated by Serum Cystatin C
Cystatin C is a nonglycosylated basic protease inhibitor that is produced at a constant rate by all nucleated cells, freely filtered by the glomerulus, and stable in frozen serum or plasma (1923). GFR is estimated by the reciprocal of cystatin C (in mg/L) multiplied by 100. The validity of cystatin C in tracking trends in renal function accuratelywhen patients have elevated or normal GFRhas been well demonstrated for individuals with diabetes (14,15,24). For the measurement of GFR when it is already impaired, estimates that are based on serum cystatin C (cC-GFR) are similar to creatinine-based estimates.
Residual variation of the cystatin C estimates around the fitted linear trends was 9.1% in this study. As in an earlier study, this is smaller than the residual variation of 12.1% for estimates that are based on iothalamate clearance (14). This is likely because short-term fluctuations in the true GFR affect direct measurements (25) but are averaged out by methods that are based on clearance of the pool of an endogenous metabolite, such as cystatin C. The difference is analogous to the difference between direct measurements of plasma glucose and measurements of HbA1c, which averages out fluctuations in glucose concentration over the lifespan of red blood cells.
In this study, all serum samples were stored at 70°C until the day of assay and were analyzed for cystatin C concentration (Dade Behring Diagnostics, Newark, DE) on a BN Prospec System nephelometer (Dade Behring Diagnostics). The assay's range of detection is 0.30 to 7.50 mg/L, with the reference range for young, healthy individuals reported as 0.53 to 0.95 mg/L. In our laboratory, the intraindividual coefficient of variation for individuals with diabetes was 3.8 to 3.0% in samples from the lowest and highest quartiles of the cystatin C distribution, respectively (14). Furthermore, assay results for replicate aliquots of serum samples that were stored at 85°C for 6 mo or in the refrigerator for up to 2 wk were equivalent to results that were obtained on fresh samples.
Determination of Abnormal Decline in Renal Function ("Early Renal Function Decline")
All serial measurements of serum cystatin C concentration were examined for trends in renal function during 8 to 12 yr of follow-up. Patients from the normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria groups provided, on average, 3.4 and 4.8 serum samples, respectively. In plots of each participant's data, renal function seemed stable during follow-up or declined linearly over time. Figure 1 demonstrates the nature of the data and magnitude of change observed by showing examples that were selected to represent the mean slopes and the extremes of the distributions.
|
Because the reference distribution for evaluating whether a negative slope or trend in renal function qualified as an abnormal rate of decline, we used the longitudinal data that were available from the Baltimore Aging Study (27). Using the weighted mean and variances for the participants who were aged 30 to 59.9 yr, we determined the range that included 95% of the distribution (3.3 to 2.8%/yr) and selected the 2.5th percentile (the lower limit) as the threshold to define cases of early progressive renal function decline.
Statistical Analyses
Analyses were performed in SAS (version 8.02 for Windows; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Significance was based on an
level of 0.05 throughout. Differences between case patients and control subjects at baseline were assessed using
2 tests for categorical variables or t test for continuous variables. Case patients with early renal function decline and control subjects with slopes within the normal range were determined according to the fixed cutoff value of 3.3%, whose derivation was described previously. Variables that were significantly related to case-control status in univariate analyses were examined in a multiple logistic analysis. Characteristics such as gender, age, and an indicator variable that distinguished incident from prevalent microalbuminuria were forced into the multivariate model, and manual forward and backward selection procedures were used to determine which additional explanatory variables had significant effects on the presence of early renal function decline. Given that the use of a fixed threshold for defining case patients and control subjects has inherent problems, we performed a confirmatory mixed-effects model (28) including random effects for the baseline GFR (the intercept) and the slope (data not shown). This maximum likelihoodbased method can properly handle unbalanced, incomplete data so that irregular sampling times during the follow-up were not problematic. The frequency of early progressive renal function decline and its determinants did not differ from the estimates shown for the fixed threshold analysis presented next.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To identify determinants of early progressive renal function decline, we compared the 94 case patients in the microalbuminuria group with the rest of the microalbuminuria group as control subjects (Table 2). To illustrate patient characteristics that also changed as renal function was changing during follow-up, Table 2 includes values for baseline and the second follow-up interval values (4 yr later). Case patients and control subjects did not differ with regard to gender, duration of diabetes, proportion of cigarette smokers, or the proportion using ACEI. However, case patients were significantly older and had higher HbA1c and total cholesterol values at baseline and during the second interval of follow-up. Systolic BP was higher during follow-up for case patients as compared with control subjects, despite no difference in baseline values. No difference in urinary albumin excretion was observed in case patients and control subjects at baseline, but by the second follow-up interval, it had increased significantly in case patients and decreased substantially in control subjects (Table 2).
|
2 test P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The frequency of early progressive renal function decline in those with microalbuminuria regression was higher than those with longstanding normoalbuminuria (16.2 versus 9.0%, respectively; P = 0.06).
|
2 in a log-likelihood test of 68.1 (P < 0.001). The risk for early progressive renal function decline was reduced for those with longer diabetes duration, but the effect was NS. Independent of diabetes duration, age was the variable that increased the risk for early renal function decline but only in the highest tertile. The course of microalbuminuria during the first 4 yr of follow-up had a very strong effect on the risk. Relative to stable microalbuminuria, regression of microalbuminuria significantly decreased the risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; P = 0.01), whereas progression of microalbuminuria significantly increased it (OR 6.5; P < 0.001). The risk increased linearly with the HbA1c value, but for ease of interpretation, it is shown dichotomized at the median, 9.0%. The odds of early progressive renal function decline for those at or above the median were 2.5 times the odds for those below the median. To investigate the role of hyperglycemia further, we identified patients whose HbA1c, regardless of baseline value, increased 1 percentage point or more between baseline and the second follow-up interval. Their risk was not significantly increased (OR 1.1; P = 0.40).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This large study of the natural history of early renal function decline in type 1 diabetes became feasible only after an assay for serum cystatin C became commercially available (19,23,29) and once it was proved to be a feasible measure in large-scale studies (24,30). A tool was needed for tracking temporal trends in renal function in patients with diabetes and a normal or elevated GFR. For this purpose specifically, the estimation of GFR by 100/cystatin C has been validated against direct measurements of the GFR by iothalamate clearance and outperforms creatinine-based estimates of renal function such as the Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations (14,15,31).
Early progressive renal function decline occurs in patients with normoalbuminuria, but it is less frequent and, if it develops, does not decline rapidly. The mean of 1.0% decline per year in this group is comparable to populations without diabetes (27). The slopes for 24 (9.0%) individuals exceeded the limits of normal variation. This finding is consistent with previous reports of a low frequency of impaired renal function in patients with type 1 diabetes and normoalbuminuria (10,11,32).
In our study, early progressive renal function decline occurred in a large proportion (one third) of the patients with microalbuminuria, despite their having normal or elevated baseline renal function. Once the process of decline began, it progressed relentlessly and reached impaired renal function or ESRD in many patients during the study period. The linearity of decline suggests that progressive renal function loss begins not during the proteinuria stage (24,33), but 10 to 15 yr earlier during the microalbuminuria stage.
Previous studies suggested that significant decline in the GFR can occur in patients with microalbuminuria (58,34). However, it was not clear from those small studies whether changes in the GFR were the result of methodologic shortcomings, short-term variations, or a truly irreversible process of renal function loss. With attention to these issuesusing serial measurements and long follow-upwe established that early progressive renal function decline in type 1 diabetes begins in approximately one third of individuals with microalbuminuria even while their renal function is normal or elevated.
The mechanisms that are responsible for initiating and sustaining the early progressive decline in renal function are unknown. The usual assumption is that morphologic lesions in the kidney underlie this decline (35). However, our finding that progressive renal function decline begins during microalbuminuria is not consistent with this hypothesis. In previous studies, patients with short duration of microalbuminuria had only small glomerular lesions in comparison with patients with normoalbuminuria (3639). Furthermore, morphologic changes are most pronounced in individuals with long diabetes duration, but the risk for early renal function decline in this study was not associated with long duration of diabetes.
From a clinical perspective, the putative process of early progressive renal function decline is very strongly associated with microalbuminuria and the subsequent course of urinary albumin excretion. Recently, the view that microalbuminuria represents a committed step toward the development of proteinuria and subsequent renal function loss (3942) has been put in question by data that characterize microalbuminuria as a process of dynamic, rather than fixed, renal injury (43). The incidence of microalbuminuria regression far outweighs that of progression to proteinuria (12,44,45). This regression is significantly more frequent in individuals with salutary factorsthat is, low levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, HbA1c, and systolic BP (12). That regression of microalbuminuria in this study is independently associated with protection from early renal function decline, even compared with those with stable microalbuminuria, provides compelling justification for a clinical trial. Ultimately, a clinical protocol for inducing microalbuminuria regressionby modifying every one of the salutary factorsmay be the most valuable intervention for preventing impaired renal function and ESRD in individuals with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.
Consistent with studies of the prevention of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes (46,47), this study demonstrates that poor glycemic control increases the risk for early progressive renal function decline. Significant hyperglycemia and high HbA1c usually accompany the onset of type 1 diabetes, and they are associated with renal hyperfiltration (48). Subsequent improvement in glycemic control restores normal renal function, mimicking early renal function decline (49). However, this decline is not progressive, and it is distinct from the early progressive renal function decline that was found in this study of patients long after their diabetes onset. The risk for early progressive renal function decline was significantly associated with high baseline levels of HbA1c. Moreover, subsequent worsening of glycemic controlrather than maintaining hyperfiltration (48)increased the risk for early renal function decline, although the effect was not quite significant statistically.
Elevated systemic BP is associated with the risk for progressive renal function decline during the advanced stages of diabetic nephropathy (5053). However, its association with the risk for early progressive renal function decline was NS in this study. Most likely, this is related to the lack of precision of BP measurements in a clinical setting and possibly the subtlety of the effect at this early stage. Although ACEI therapy was associated with a lower risk for renal function decline, the effect was NS and did not share the magnitude of effect that was seen with lower levels of HbA1c or the regression of microalbuminuria.
This study contributes toward the goal of establishing a clinical algorithm for early identification of patients who are at risk for ESRD. On the basis of a low risk for early renal function decline, a patient with type 1 diabetes can expect to have a low risk for developing ESRD if microalbuminuria has never developed or if it has regressed after its onset. However, those who develop persistent microalbuminuria warrant screening for early renal function decline using cystatin C.
The results of this study must be considered in light of two potential limitations. First, the study consisted of a relatively young population with type 1 diabetes, and, therefore, the results may not be generalizable to the elderly or to those with type 2 diabetes. Second, the accuracy of serum cystatin C at estimating changes in GFR in the low rangeswhen it is already impairedhas not been sufficiently studied. For example, the advantages of 100/cystatin C formula may diminish as GFR falls into the impaired range; as such, other proposed equations using cystatin C tend to adjust the estimated GFR to even lower values (54). Although the best strategy for estimating GFR from cystatin C in the impaired range has yet to be determined, use of the equation 100/cystatin C rather than an alternative estimating equation (54) would be predicted to underestimate conservatively the magnitude of early progressive renal function decline in this population rather than to overestimate it.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
See the related editorial, "Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria: Twin Manifestations of Nephropathy in Diabetes," on pages 10361037.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. H. de Boer, R. Katz, J. J. Cao, L. F. Fried, B. Kestenbaum, K. Mukamal, D. E. Rifkin, M. J. Sarnak, M. G. Shlipak, and D. S. Siscovick Cystatin C, Albuminuria, and Mortality Among Older Adults With Diabetes Diabetes Care, October 1, 2009; 32(10): 1833 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yokoyama, S. Kanno, S. Takahashi, D. Yamada, H. Itoh, K. Saito, H. Sone, and M. Haneda Determinants of Decline in Glomerular Filtration Rate in Nonproteinuric Subjects with or without Diabetes and Hypertension Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 4(9): 1432 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Merchant, B. A. Perkins, G. M. Boratyn, L. H. Ficociello, D. W. Wilkey, M. T. Barati, C. C. Bertram, G. P. Page, B. H. Rovin, J. H. Warram, et al. Urinary Peptidome May Predict Renal Function Decline in Type 1 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 2065 - 2074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, D. K. Deb, J. Kong, G. Ning, Y. Wang, G. Li, Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. Strugnell, Y. Sabbagh, et al. Long-term therapeutic effect of vitamin D analog doxercalciferol on diabetic nephropathy: strong synergism with AT1 receptor antagonist Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F791 - F801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mauer, B. Zinman, R. Gardiner, S. Suissa, A. Sinaiko, T. Strand, K. Drummond, S. Donnelly, P. Goodyer, M. C. Gubler, et al. Renal and Retinal Effects of Enalapril and Losartan in Type 1 Diabetes N. Engl. J. Med., July 2, 2009; 361(1): 40 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Pezzolesi, G. D. Poznik, J. C. Mychaleckyj, A. D. Paterson, M. T. Barati, J. B. Klein, D. P.K. Ng, G. Placha, L. H. Canani, J. Bochenski, et al. Genome-Wide Association Scan for Diabetic Nephropathy Susceptibility Genes in Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, June 1, 2009; 58(6): 1403 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Khavandi, A. S. Greenstein, K. Sonoyama, S. Withers, A. Price, R. A. Malik, and A. M. Heagerty Myogenic tone and small artery remodelling: insight into diabetic nephropathy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 361 - 369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Garman, S. Mulroney, M. Manigrasso, E. Flynn, and C. Maric Omega-3 fatty acid rich diet prevents diabetic renal disease Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): F306 - F316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Niewczas, L. H. Ficociello, A. C. Johnson, W. Walker, E. T. Rosolowsky, B. Roshan, J. H. Warram, and A. S. Krolewski Serum Concentrations of Markers of TNF{alpha} and Fas-Mediated Pathways and Renal Function in Nonproteinuric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 4(1): 62 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fontsere, J. Bonal, I. Salinas, M. R. de Arellano, J. Rios, F. Torres, A. Sanmarti, and R. Romero Is the New Mayo Clinic Quadratic Equation Useful for the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Type 2 Diabetic Patients? Diabetes Care, December 1, 2008; 31(12): 2265 - 2267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, G. Ning, D. K. Deb, J. Kong, and Y. C. Li Combination therapy with AT1 blocker and vitamin D analog markedly ameliorates diabetic nephropathy: Blockade of compensatory renin increase PNAS, October 14, 2008; 105(41): 15896 - 15901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kato, H. Si, T. Hostetter, and K. Susztak Smad1 as a Biomarker for Diabetic Nephropathy Diabetes, June 1, 2008; 57(6): 1459 - 1460. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Rosolowsky, L. H. Ficociello, N. J. Maselli, M. A. Niewczas, A. L. Binns, B. Roshan, J. H. Warram, and A. S. Krolewski High-Normal Serum Uric Acid Is Associated with Impaired Glomerular Filtration Rate in Nonproteinuric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 706 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Wolkow, M. A. Niewczas, B. Perkins, L. H. Ficociello, B. Lipinski, J. H. Warram, and A. S. Krolewski Association of Urinary Inflammatory Markers and Renal Decline in Microalbuminuric Type 1 Diabetics J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 789 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. H. de Boer and M. W. Steffes Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria: Twin Manifestations of Nephropathy in Diabetes J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1036 - 1037. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |