| 2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLINICAL RESEARCH |










* Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's, Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom;
Renal Section, Division of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom;
Department of Otolaryngology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Department of Immunology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; || Renal Immunopathology Centre, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Milan, Italy; ¶ Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; ** Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain; 
Department of Nephrology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; 
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 
Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden; |||| Department of Nephrology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; and ¶¶ Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
Correspondence: Dr. David Jayne, Box 118, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Phone: +44-1223-217259; Fax: +44-1223-586506; dj106{at}cam.ac.uk
Received for publication January 23, 2007. Accepted for publication April 25, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A role for ANCA in the pathogenesis of renal vasculitis is supported by the induction of neutrophil activation and superoxide release and neutrophil-mediated endothelial cytotoxicity by ANCA in vitro,8 by the induction of crescentic glomerulonephritis in animal studies by ANCA,9, 10 and by the close association of ANCA with pauci-immune renal vasculitis.6, 11, 12
Combination therapy with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone leads to remission in 80 to 90% of patients.12 However, those who present with advanced renal failure have poorer outcomes, with only 50% surviving with independent renal function at 1 yr.5 The addition of intravenous methylprednisolone or plasma exchange has been advocated for those with severe vasculitic presentations.13 Plasma exchange was introduced for the removal of anti–glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibodies in Goodpasture disease and used subsequently in crescentic glomerulonephritis without anti-GBM antibodies.14–16 A randomized trial in the latter group found improved outcomes with plasma exchange in those with severe renal failure at presentation.15 After the discovery of ANCA in the sera of patients with vasculitis and evidence supporting the pathogenicity of ANCA, a rationale has emerged for early plasma exchange to reduce levels of circulating ANCA and contribute to disease control in vasculitis.
The European Vasculitis Study Group has defined a "severe renal" subgroup as being patients who present with a serum creatinine >500 µmol/L (5.8 mg/dl) attributable to active vasculitis.17 This study compared the addition of either intravenous methylprednisolone or plasma exchange with cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone in severe renal vasculitis, with renal recovery as the primary outcome measure.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
A total of 244 adverse events were reported in 122 patients (Table 3). Severe or life-threatening events occurred in 32 (48%) of 67 of the intravenous methylprednisolone group and 35 (50%) of 70 of the plasma exchange group (P = 0.80). Leukopenia and infection were the most common adverse events. Although uncommon, severe thrombocytopenia and thrombosis were seen only in the plasma exchange group and may have been related to the procedure (Table 3).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The risk reduction of 24% for ESRD with plasma exchange is of clinical importance in view of the cost, morbidity, and mortality of end-stage renal failure, and the additional costs of plasma exchange are outweighed by these savings. The improvement in renal recovery rates with plasma exchange in the severe renal subgroup is consistent with our hypothesis that plasma exchange is most likely to be of benefit in those with the most severe disease. This study excluded patients who had been dialysis dependent for >2 wk because they were considered to have little chance of renal recovery.
Previous studies in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis without anti-GBM antibodies have been small, have often included other diagnoses, and have failed to demonstrate a benefit of plasma exchange except in subgroup analysis of those with advanced renal failure.15, 16, 20, 21 The randomized, controlled trial of patients with systemic vasculitis reported by Pusey et al.15 showed a significant benefit in patients who were on dialysis at the start of treatment, although numbers were small. Two randomized studies in polyarteritis nodosa and Churg Strauss angiitis found no additional therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange but did not have renal function as their primary end point.21, 22 One randomized trial in Wegener's granulomatosis and three nonrandomized, controlled trials in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis reported benefits of plasma exchange on renal outcome.23–26 Because this study focuses on a specific renal subgroup, its results are not in conflict with those showing negative results for plasma exchange and support the results of at least two previous randomized trials.15, 24, 25
There was no difference in rates of adverse effects, infections, or mortality between treatment groups. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of plasma exchange, and complications of vascular access are less relevant when this is also required for renal support.27 The high rate of severe adverse events, 46%, was largely due to cytopenias and infections related to corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. It was higher than in previous studies in patients with less severe renal function using similar regimens.5, 12 This difference may in part be explained by the delayed clearance of cyclophosphamide and its metabolites in renal failure and by the age of patients in this study.28
Mortality was 25.5% at 12 mo, considerably higher than in vasculitis studies without severe renal failure, with infection and lung hemorrhage being the major causes of death.12, 29 Most deaths occurred during the first 3 mo, when corticosteroid dosages were highest and vasculitis was most active. A link among cyclophosphamide, neutropenia, sepsis, and death was previously shown, as was the independent role of steroid dosage on infective risk.5 However, after 3 mo, there was a higher mortality in those who had failed to recover renal function, confirming results from cohort studies.5 Thus, effective early therapy is imperative to avoid vasculitic death and maximize the chance of renal recovery. When compared with a study from this group of vasculitis with serum creatinine <500 µmol/L (5.8 mg/dl), patients in this study were older (mean 64.3 versus 55.6 yr; P < 0.0001). They were also more likely to have a diagnosis of microscopic polyangiitis (69 versus 39%; P < 0.0001) and to be MPO-ANCA positive (52 versus 37%; P = 0.003).12 Age has previously been shown to be associated with early mortality in renal vasculitis and may have accounted, in part, for the high mortality that was seen in this study.5, 18 The contribution of drug toxicity to the mortality of severe renal vasculitis indicates that dosing of cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids in this patient group requires urgent consideration and emphasizes the need for safer agents.
Anti-MPO antibodies can cause glomerulonephritis and alveolar capillaritis in animal models, and ANCA have potent effects on neutrophil activation, cytokine and enzyme release, leukocyte–endothelial interactions, and endothelial cytotoxicity in human in vitro systems.8, 9, 30–32 There is a rationale for the physical removal of ANCA by plasma exchange, whereas simultaneous corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide suppress inflammation and autoantibody production. Plasma exchange also removes other proinflammatory factors, including cytokines, complement, coagulation factors, soluble endothelial adhesion molecules and neutrophil enzymes, which may contribute to its effect.33, 34 Sequential ANCA assays were not routinely performed in this study, and it is not known whether the dosage of plasma exchange should be titrated against the ANCA level, as has been advocated for anti-GBM disease.35
Our study supports the use of plasma exchange in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis that presents with renal failure. The role of intravenous methylprednisolone in addition to plasma exchange for this indication and the role of plasma exchange for other severe vasculitic manifestations, such as diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, requires further study.13, 36, 37
| CONCISE METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
All patients received the same oral drug regimen of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone. At trial entry, patients were randomly assigned to receive, in addition, either intravenous methylprednisolone or plasma exchange. At 6 mo, cyclophosphamide was withdrawn and azathioprine was commenced. The study duration was 12 mo.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion required (1) a diagnosis of Wegener's granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis, using criteria adapted from the disease definitions of the Chapel Hill consensus conference1, 12; (2) biopsy-proven, pauci-immune, necrotizing, and/or crescentic glomerulonephritis, in the absence of other glomerulopathy; and (3) serum creatinine >500 µmol/L (5.8 mg/dl). Exclusion criteria were (1) age <18 or >80 yr; (2) inadequate contraception in women of child-bearing age; (3) pregnancy; (4) previous malignancy; (5) hepatitis B antigenemia, anti–hepatitis C virus, or anti-HIV antibody; (6) other multisystem autoimmune disease; (7) circulating anti-GBM antibodies or linear IgG staining of the GBM on renal biopsy; (8) life-threatening nonrenal manifestations of vasculitis, including alveolar hemorrhage requiring mechanical ventilation within 24 h of admission; (9) dialysis for >2 wk before entry; (10) creatinine >200 µmol/L (2.3 mg/dl)
1 yr before entry; (11) a second clearly defined cause of renal failure; (12) previous episode of biopsy-proven necrotizing and/or crescentic glomerulonephritis; (13) >2 wk of treatment with cyclophosphamide or azathioprine; (14) >500 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone; (15) plasma exchange within the preceding year; (16) >3 mo of treatment with oral prednisolone; and (17) allergy to study medications.
Drug Regimens
Both groups received oral cyclophosphamide 2.5 mg/kg per d (2 mg/kg per d for age >60 yr), reduced to 1.5 mg/kg per d at 3 mo and stopped at 6 mo. Azathioprine 2 mg/kg per d was commenced at 6 mo. Oral prednisolone was tapered from 1 mg/kg per d at entry to 0.25 mg/kg per d by 10 wk, 15 mg/d at 3 mom and 10 mg/d from 5 to 12 mo. Prophylaxis against steroid-induced gastritis, fungal infection, and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia was suggested but was not mandatory. The intravenous methylprednisolone group received 1000 mg/d intravenous methylprednisolone for three consecutive months, starting on the day of entry.
Plasma Exchange Procedure
Because plasma exchange protocols varied between participating centers, investigators were permitted to use their local procedure with respect to (1) plasma filtration or centrifugation, (2) vascular access, (3) anticoagulation, and (4) daily or alternate-day exchanges. The following aspects of the procedure were mandated in the protocol: (1) A total of seven plasma exchanges within 14 d of study entry, (2) a plasma exchange volume of 60 ml/kg on each occasion, and (3) volume replacement with 5% albumin. The use of fresh frozen plasma at the end of the procedure to replenish coagulation factors was recommended but not mandated for patients who were at risk for hemorrhage, for example after kidney biopsy.
Evaluations
Study assessments were performed after 0, 1.5, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo. They included full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, alanine transaminase, serum creatinine, and glucose. Disease activity was measured by the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score.38 Cumulative all-cause damage was scored in the Vasculitis Damage Index at 0, 6, and 12 mo.39 The SF-36 questionnaire was performed at each assessment.40 Adverse events were graded by 22 predefined criteria into mild, moderate, severe, or life threatening.
Renal Histology
A total of 102 (75%) renal biopsies from the 137 patients in the study were available for central review; in two, there was insufficient material for further analysis. Biopsies were taken at diagnosis and scored according to a previously standardized protocol.3, 19 Briefly, each glomerulus was scored separately for the presence of fibrinoid necrosis, crescents (cellular/fibrous and segmental/circumferential), sclerosis (local, segmental, or global), periglomerular infiltrates, granulomatous reactions, and other lesions. Affected glomeruli were reported as the percentage of the total number of glomeruli in a biopsy. Most interstitial, tubular, and vascular lesions were scored dichotomously, except for interstitial infiltrates, type of cellular infiltrates (neutrophils, mononuclear cells, and eosinophils), interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy, which were scored semiquantitatively. Each biopsy was evaluated by two observers. Discrepancies between observers were resolved by conference during central reviews to achieve a consensus for each biopsy. The average distribution of glomerular, tubulointerstitial, and vascular lesions was evaluated for the total group of patients for whom histologic data were available. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed by independent-samples t test for glomerular lesions and by nonparametric analysis (Wilcoxon-signed rank test) for tubulointerstitial and vascular lesions.
Outcome Measures
The primary efficacy measure was renal recovery at 3 mo defined by patient survival, dialysis independence, and serum creatinine <500 µmol/L (5.8 mg/dl). Secondary end points included patient survival at 12 mo; ESRD, defined by dialysis requirement for at least 6 wk without subsequent renal recovery; serum creatinine in recovering patients at 12 mo; and adverse event rates.
Statistical Analyses
Randomization was performed centrally by permuted blocks of four stratified by country and by whether the patient was nonoliguric or likely to require dialysis within the next 48 h. Primary data were collected in record books and submitted for centralized computer entry. The data were validated against the record books before analysis (SPSS PC statistical package, version 9; SPSS, Chicago, IL) by two data managers who had sole access to the data.
The predicted renal recovery rate for the intravenous methylprednisolone group was 50%, and the study was designed to detect an increase in recovery rate in the plasma exchange group of >20% (i.e., from 50% to at least 70%).41 Allowing for a 10% dropout, 150 patients were required to achieve a significance level of 0.05 (two sided) and power of 0.8.
The primary end point was analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle with death being regarded as a failure to achieve renal recovery. Renal recovery rates at 3 mo were compared by the Pearson
2 test. Renal and patient survivals between groups were compared by the log-rank test. A Cox regression model was used to determine the hazard ratio for renal survival. The influence of treatment group, stratification (nonoliguric or dialysis requiring), age, diagnosis (Wegener's granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis), and ANCA subtype (PR3-ANCA or MPO-ANCA) on renal recovery and patient survival were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patient survival after 6 wk was compared between patients who had recovered renal function and those who had not by log-rank test. Demographic details, adverse events, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (area under the curve), serum creatinine, and Vasculitis Damage Index were compared between groups by Mann-Whitney U test or Pearson
2 test. SF-36 mean scores were calculated for each of the eight dimensions using the Likert method of summated ratings, and change in scores over time was compared between groups by repeated measures analysis. All tests of significance were two sided and were considered significant at the 0.05 level. No interim analyses were performed.
| DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Jo Hermans (Leiden, Netherlands) and Paul Landais (Paris, France) for statistical advice, Helen Talbot (Edinburgh, UK) for software design, UK for data management, and Lucy Jayne (London, UK) for trial administration.
Participating physicians: M. Wissing, Institut Edith Cavell, Brussels, Belgium; J. Sennesael, AZ VUB Jette, Brussels, Belgium; M. Dhaene, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium; I. Rychlik, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; A. Wiik, Statens Seriminstitutet, Copenhagen, Denmark; A. Ekstrand, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; P. Lesavre, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France; P. Vanhille, Centre Hospitalier, Valenciennes, France; K. de Groot, University Hospital, Hannover, Germany; O. Hergesell, K. Andrassy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; H. Rupprecht, S. Weidner, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany; R. Nowack, W. Schmitt, University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; M. Vischedyk, St. Vinzenz-Hospital Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; F. Ferrario, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Borromeo, Italy; R. Confalonieri, Ospedale Niguarda, Niguarda, Italy; J. Dadoniene, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania; E.C. Hagen, University Eemland Hospital, Amersfoort, Netherlands; C. Verburgh, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; J.W. Cohen Tervaert, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; M. Valles, Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain; R. Poveda, Hospital Bellvitje, Barcelona, Spain; J. Ballerin, F. Calero, Fundación Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain; M. Heimburger, Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; M. Segelmark, G. Sterner, University Hospital of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden; M. Tidman, Nephrology University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden; D. Adu, L. Harper, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Birmingham, UK; P. Mathieson, C. Tomson, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK; R. Luqmani, N. Turner, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK; J. Feehally, University Hospital, Leicester, UK; P. Mason, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK; A. Burns, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; D. Oliveira, St. George's Hospital, London, UK; J. Stevens, Southampton Hospital, Southampton, UK; A. Williams, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
| Footnotes |
|---|
See the related editorial, "Removing Antibody and Preserving Glomeruli in ANCA Small-Vessel Vasculitis," on pages 1987–1989.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Vincenti, S. D. Cohen, and G. Appel Novel B Cell Therapeutic Targets in Transplantation and Immune-Mediated Glomerular Diseases Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2010; 5(1): 142 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Mukhtyar, R Lee, D Brown, D Carruthers, B Dasgupta, S Dubey, O Flossmann, C Hall, J Hollywood, D Jayne, et al. Modification and validation of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (version 3) Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2009; 68(12): 1827 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Gomez-Puerta, J. Hernandez-Rodriguez, A. Lopez-Soto, and X. Bosch Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitides and Respiratory Disease Chest, October 1, 2009; 136(4): 1101 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. MERKEL, K. HERLYN, A. D. MAHR, T. NEOGI, P. SEO, M. WALSH, M. BOERS, and R. LUQMANI Progress Towards a Core Set of Outcome Measures in Small-vessel Vasculitis. Report from OMERACT 9 J Rheumatol, October 1, 2009; 36(10): 2362 - 2368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. de Groot, L. Harper, D. R.W. Jayne, L. F. Flores Suarez, G. Gregorini, W. L. Gross, R. Luqmani, C. D. Pusey, N. Rasmussen, R. A. Sinico, et al. Pulse Versus Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide for Induction of Remission in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody--Associated Vasculitis: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, May 19, 2009; 150(10): 670 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Mukhtyar, L Guillevin, M C Cid, B Dasgupta, K de Groot, W Gross, T Hauser, B Hellmich, D Jayne, C G M Kallenberg, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2009; 68(3): 310 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Specks Pulmonary Vasculitis and Alveolar Hemorrhage Syndromes ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 25(0): 687 - 704. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dechmann-Sultemeyer, R. Linkeschova, K. Lenzen, Z. Kuril, B. Grabensee, and A. Voiculescu Tandem plasmapheresis and haemodialysis as a safe procedure in 82 patients with immune-mediated disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 252 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maripuri and F. C. Fervenza 71-Year-Old Man With Shortness of Breath and Rash Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2008; 83(12): 1388 - 1391. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Walsh, A Chaudhry, and D Jayne Long-term follow-up of relapsing/refractory anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis treated with the lymphocyte depleting antibody alemtuzumab (CAMPATH-1H) Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2008; 67(9): 1322 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Salama, H. T. Cook, C. D. Pusey, and R. J. Pepper A Case of Treated ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Recurrent Renal Failure Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 637 - 645. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lionaki and R. J. Falk Removing Antibody and Preserving Glomeruli in ANCA Small-Vessel Vasculitis J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 18(7): 1987 - 1989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |