Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2008 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.505 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on May 4, 2005
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
© 2005 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004080632
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2004080632v1
16/6/1775    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Snapinn, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Snapinn, S. M.


CLINICAL SCIENCE: Clinical Nephrology

Importance of Baseline Distribution of Proteinuria in Renal Outcomes Trials: Lessons from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study

Zhongxin Zhang 1*, Shahnaz Shahinfar 1, William F. Keane 2, Denise Ramjit 1, Tania Z. Dickson 3, Gilbert W. Gleim 3, Carl Erik Mogensen 4, Dick de Zeeuw 5, Barry M. Brenner 6, Steven M. Snapinn 1

1

*Cardiovascular Clinical Research


2

{dagger}Clinical Development


3

{ddagger}Medical Communications Department, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania


4

{sect}Medical Department, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark


5

||Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands


6

Renal Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zhongxin_zhang{at}merck.com.


   Abstract

A key issue in the analysis of outcome trials is the adjustment for baseline covariates that influence the primary outcome. Imbalance of an important covariate between treatment groups at baseline is of considerable concern if one treatment group is favored over another with respect to the hypothesis testing outcome. With the use of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study database as an example, the influence of baseline proteinuria on the primary composite endpoint, ESRD, and ESRD or death after adjusting for baseline proteinuria as a continuous covariate was examined. Increasing baseline proteinuria was associated with increased risk for renal events, confirming that proteinuria is an important covariate for renal outcomes. When the randomization was stratified according proteinuria <2000 mg/g or ≥2000 mg/g, within the higher proteinuria stratum (≥2000 mg/g), patients in the losartan group had a higher baseline mean proteinuria value. When the imbalance was adjusted, an increase in the magnitude and the significance of the risk reduction with losartan for each outcome was observed. No apparent interaction between treatment effect and baseline proteinuria was found, and there was no heterogeneity in the treatment response in patients with different baseline proteinuria levels. After proteinuria was adjusted as a continuous variable, greater treatment effects were observed in the RENAAL study. This effect was due solely to the imbalance in baseline proteinuria. Considering the importance of proteinuria as a risk factor, adjustment for baseline proteinuria as a continuous covariate should be prespecified in the design and analysis of clinical trials involving renal outcomes, even when patients are stratified on the basis of level of proteinuria.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. M. O'Hare, J. S. Kaufman, K. E. Covinsky, C. S. Landefeld, L. V. McFarland, and E. B. Larson
Current Guidelines for Using Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II-Receptor Antagonists in Chronic Kidney Disease: Is the Evidence Base Relevant to Older Adults?
Ann Intern Med, May 19, 2009; 150(10): 717 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Ruggenenti, E. Perticucci, P. Cravedi, V. Gambara, M. Costantini, S. K. Sharma, A. Perna, and G. Remuzzi
Role of Remission Clinics in the Longitudinal Treatment of CKD
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1213 - 1224.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. T. Lely, F. G.H. van der Kleij, T. J. Kistemaker, A. J. Apperloo, P. E. de Jong, D. de Zeeuw, and G. Navis
Impact of the Preintervention Rate of Renal Function Decline on Outcome of Renoprotective Intervention
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 54 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP